Nissen fundoplication surgery for extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux (EER)

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of Nissen fundoplication surgery for the treatment of patients with chronic extraesophageal manifestations of reflux (EER). METHODS: A retrospective medical record analysis was performed. Patient demographics, extraesophageal disease secondary to gastroesophageal reflux (GER), methods of GER diagnosis, acid suppression therapy before antireflux surgery, and response to surgical intervention were evaluated. RESULTS: The charts of 29 patients who underwent Nissen fundoplication surgery for EER were included in the study. Hoarseness was present in 17 patients; laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) was the most common diagnosis (n = 20). Barium esophagram was done in all patients and revealed abnormalities indicative of GER in 26 patients. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory pH study was done in 27 patients and pharyngeal reflux was present in 19. Preoperative esophageal endoscopy was performed in 22 patients. This study revealed evidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in 14 patients with 8 having evidence of Barrett's esophagus. Sixteen of the 29 patients had symptoms or findings of GERD. Twenty-eight patients had laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) and 1 had an open procedure. Twenty-five of the 29 patients (follow-up ranging from 6-108 mo) had excellent results with near-total freedom from symptoms and are taking no acid-suppressive medications. CONCLUSIONS: GER has an important role in the cause of many otolaryngologic and pulmonary disorders. Nissen fundoplication is an effective modality to treat EER in selected cases.     

Paroxysmal Laryngospasm Secondary to Gastroesophageal Reflux

Over a 2-year period (1992 to 1994), 12 consecutive adult patients with paroxysmal laryngospasm were prospectively studied. All had had other symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER); however, only 4 (33%) experienced symptoms of heartburn. Each patient underwent fiberoptic laryngeal examination, barium swallow/esophagography, and ambulatory, 24-hour, double-probe pH monitoring(pH-metry). Eleven (92%) of the 12 patients had evidence of GER on examination, and 10(83%) had abnormal pH-metry, including 3 who demonstrated pharyngeal reflux while having normal total acid exposure times in the esophageal probe. All the patients responded to antireflux treatment, using dietary and lifestyle modifications and omeprazole, with complete cessation of the laryngospastic episodes. This study documents the role of GER in the etiology of paroxysmal laryngospasm, it highlights the advantages of double-probe pH-metry in diagnosing this extraesophageal manifestation of GER, and it demonstrates that antireflux therapy with omeprazole is effective in controlling GER-induced laryngospasm.     

Pathophysiological mechanisms of extraesophageal reflux in otolaryngeal disorders

As more than 40% of adults experience symptoms of the gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and 26% are affected by the extraesophageal reflux (EER), the aim of this article was to review the literature concerning pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to these common diseases. Reflux symptoms are ascribable for nearly one-third of otolaryngeal disorders. In contrast to patients solely affected by GERD, patients with otolaryngeal disorders attributable to extraesophageal reflux have a relatively good esophageal acid clearance but for unknown reasons increased amounts of laryngeal reflux. Transient upper esophageal sphincter relaxations are discussed as the pathophysiological mechanism, as the resting tone of the upper esophageal sphincter is not affected. When exposed to gastroduodenal contents, the ciliated epithelium of otolaryngeal structures is more susceptible to damage, and thereby even a few reflux episodes are suggested to cause extraesophageal reflux disease (EERD). Particularly active pepsin contributes to laryngeal lesions and eustachian tube dysfunction. Despite the importance of EER in laryngeal diseases, the causative role in other otolaryngeal disorders like sinusitis and otitis media with effusion remains unresolved.     

Is laryngopharyngeal reflux an important risk factor in the development of laryngeal carcinoma?

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) as a causative irritating factor in the development of laryngeal carcinoma has been suggested. However, the association between LPR and laryngeal carcinoma remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence and severity of reflux between patients with laryngeal carcinoma and clinical LPR. The intention was to find out if a correlation exists between the laryngeal findings and the level of acid reflux. The study population consisted of 29 patients with laryngeal cancer (group I), 33 LPR patients with normal laryngeal findings (group II) and 70 LPR patients with related laryngeal pathology (group III). The results of 24-h, double-channel ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring were analyzed comparing the three groups. The occurrence and severity of abnormal acid reflux at the upper and lower esophageal segments were evaluated. The incidence of LPR or gastroesophageal reflux (GER) did not vary in any of the three groups (LPR was present in 62, 42 and 56% of the patients, while GER was present in 45, 24 and 37% of the patients, respectively). Patients with LPR or GER from the three groups did not differ significantly in terms of the number of acid reflux episodes and percentage of times when the pH was <4. Our data do not support the hypothesis that LPR can be an independent risk factor in the development of larynx cancers. However, the data also do not thoroughly exclude the possibility. The reason why LPR leads to variable pathologies in the larynx may be uncovered by studies probing the differences between patients via detailed examinations of the local anti-reflux barriers such as epithelial morphology and functions.     

Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux

Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) have gained better recognition over the past few years. GER and LPR usually present as regurgitation, emesis, epigastric pain, failure to thrive, esophagitis, or stricture. Many patients suffer respiratory disorders associated with reflux. Classification of reflux, pathophysiology, manifestations of reflux, diagnosis, and management of the disease are discussed in this article.     

Incongruence between histologic and endoscopic diagnoses of Barrett's esophagus using transnasal esophagoscopy

OBJECTIVES: The symptoms, patterns of reflux, and clinical manifestations of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) differ from those of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in many ways. The purposes of this study were to determine the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in patients with LPR using transnasal esophagoscopy (TNE) and to determine if there is agreement between TNE clinical findings and pathology results when using TNE for Barrett's screening. STUDY DESIGN: This study involved a retrospective review of the records of 200 consecutive patients with LPR undergoing esophageal screening. METHODS: The prevalence of patients with findings clinically suspicious for Barrett's and the biopsy results for those patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 200 patients with LPR who were screened with TNE, 10% (20 of 200) had findings suspicious for Barrett's esophagus, and, of those, only 30% (six of 20) had biopsy-proven Barrett's metaplasia. CONCLUSION: Although TNE may be a useful screening tool for Barrett's, there is incongruence between TNE findings and biopsy results, which likely reflects suboptimal biopsy methods with TNE. New biopsy techniques such as the CDx brush biopsy may enhance the sensitivity of TNE biopsies, and future studies are needed in this area.     

Double probe pH-monitoring findings in patients with benign lesions of the true vocal folds: comparison with typical GERD and the effect of smoking

We conducted a pH-monitoring study to determine the prevalence of pathologic gastroesophageal reflux (GER+) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR+) in patients with resected benign true vocal fold lesions (TVFLs) and positive reflux finding score (RFS). We compared our findings with those of patients with typical GER disease (GERD) symptoms and normal laryngoscopy. In the group of patients with TVFLs, we compared the pH-monitoring findings of smokers with those of non-smokers. Seventy-two [females 32, mean (SD) age 49.3 (13.1) years] patients with resected TVFLs (polyps: 32, nodules: 20, Reinke’s edema: 12, granulomas: 4, leukoplakia: 4) and 24 [females 14, mean (SD) age 42.2 (13.4) years] patients with typical GERD symptoms, who served as controls for the hypopharyngeal measurements, underwent 24-h double probe, hypopharyngeal and distal esophageal, ambulatory pH monitoring. Thirty-eight (52.8%) patients with TVFLs had GER+ and 52 (72.2%) had LPR+. More laryngopharyngeal reflux episodes (LPREs) were detected in patients with TVFLs compared to those with GERD (P < 0.001). With respect to the specific TVFLs, 12 (37.5%) patients with polyps had GER+ and 24 (75%) had LPR+, 6 (30%) patients with nodules had GER+ and 12 (60%) had LPR+, 6 (50%) patients with Reinke’s edema had GER+ and 8 (66.7%) had LPR+ and all the patients with granuloma or leucoplakia had both GER+ and LPR+. Twenty (55.6%) of the 36 smokers and 32 (88.9%) of the 36 non-smokers with TVFLs had LPR+ (P = 0.003), while GER+ was recorded in 16 (44.4%) smokers and 22 (61.1%) non-smokers (P = 0.238). Smokers had significantly less LPREs (P < 0.001). In conclusion, 24-h double probe pH monitoring may detect GER+ and/or LPR+ in a substantial proportion of patients with resected TVFLs and positive RFS. Our study suggests that LPR+ is more prevalent in patients with TVFLs compared with typical GERD patients and that non-smokers with TVFLs are more likely to have LPR+ than smokers with TVFLs.     

Transnasal esophagoscopy: a high-yield diagnostic tool

OBJECTIVES: Transnasal esophagoscopy (TNE) reveals a wide range of esophageal findings. TNE technique, indications, outcomes, advantages, limitations, and impact on patient care are described. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Charts of the first 30 patients to undergo TNE in an academic otolaryngology practice were reviewed. Technique details, patient demographics, and procedure indications and findings as well as the disposition of patients in this series are described. TNE limitations are discussed with areas for future development. RESULTS: Thirty patients who underwent unsedated outpatient TNE by their otolaryngologist are described. TNE was directed toward select indications: dysphagia, screening esophagoscopy given long-standing gastroesophageal reflux (GER) or laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), and esophageal surveillance with a new diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Positive findings included mucosal cobblestoning, Barrett's esophagus, esophagitis, gastritis, candidal esophagitis, esophageal diverticulum, postcricoid mass, patulous esophagus, and absence of secondary esophageal peristalsis. Outcomes included referral to a gastroenterologist for evaluation, with or without biopsy; direct laryngoscopy or esophagoscopy with biopsy by the otolaryngologist; planned cancer resection by the otolaryngologist; and medical management of GER/LPR by the otolaryngologist. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate selection criteria, TNE yields a high percentage of positive findings and wide range of esophageal abnormalities, directly impacting patient management. Available to otolaryngologists in the outpatient setting, TNE expedites interventions by providing a safe, effective alternative to rigid esophagoscopy under general anesthesia and flexible upper endoscopy with sedation. Patients will benefit from the integration of TNE into otolaryngologists' outpatient diagnostic armamentarium.     

Caracterización de la enfermedad por reflujo faringolaríngeo en pacientes de edad avanzada y ancianos

ObjectivesTo characterize laryngo-pharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients over 60 years of age.MethodsRetrospective review of patients over 60 years of age with symptoms suspicious of LPR, seen from 2005 to 2014 at an ENT Department of an academic hospital. Eighty-five consecutive patients (54 females, 31 males) who had completed a dual-sensor 24-hour pH-metry were included (considered “gold-standard” in LPR diagnosis).Body mass index, and reflux information and interventions were revised. pH-metries were evaluated according to DeMeester & Johnson's criteria. Symptoms were assessed according to the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and classified as abnormal if score was ≥13. A naso-fibro-laryngoscopy enabled findings to be documented according to the Reflux Finding Score (RFS), and they were classified as abnormal if the score was ≥7.ResultsThe patients’ mean age was 67 years. A positive pH-metry was present in 70 patients (82.5%). Fifty patients (59%) had abnormal body mass index, and almost 90% of them had an abnormal pH-metry. Mean RSI score was 9.8, with abnormal results in 24 patients (28%). Only 20 patients (23%) with abnormal RSI had a positive pH-metry. Posterior commissure hypertrophy was the most common finding (90% of patients). Mean RFS score was 9.07, with abnormal results in 69 patients (81%). Sixty-one patients (70%) with abnormal RFS had a positive pH-metry. Only 18 patients (20%) had coincidental abnormal pH-metry, RSI, and RFS.ConclusionsIn ageing patients, abnormal body mass index is strongly associated with abnormal pH-metry. RSI is a weak indicator of LPR, whereas RFS has a moderate value.     

咽喉反流与发声障碍的相关性研究

目的:探讨咽喉反流的嗓音学特征及其对患者生活质量的影响,分析主客观评估方法的相关性。方法:对196例可疑有咽喉反流的患者行一般情况调查、电子鼻咽喉镜检查、反流症状指数量表(RSI)和反流检查计分量表(RFS)评估,将其中RSI评分>13分、RFS评分>7分定为阳性。将2个量表评分均为阳性的100例患者作为研究对象,进一步进行嗓音障碍指数量表(VHI)评估、嗓音声学分析及电声门图检查,并与健康对照组比较。结果:男女基频均比健康对照组降低,基频微扰、振幅微扰及标准化噪声能量增高,接触率降低,最大发声时间缩短,与健康对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。VHI量表评估生理P评分最高,其次为功能F评分,情感E评分最低。咽喉反流患者的RSI与VHI有一定相关性(P<0.05),而RFS与RSI、VHI无明显相关性(P>0.05)。咽喉反流患者的嗓音障碍指数评估示生理、功能和情感之间明显相关。结论:嗓音声学分析及电声门图检测从客观上提示咽喉反流相关的嗓音障碍疾病严重影响了喉的发声功能,使基频下降、声带振动不稳定、声门闭合不良及声门接触时间缩短。主客观评估方法的相关性结果提示具有明显咽喉反流症状的患者并不一定具有明显的咽喉反流体征。     

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征与夜间咽喉反流的相关性研究

目的 探讨阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome,OSAHS)与夜间咽喉反流(laryngopharyngeal reflux,LPR)的关系.方法 分析19例OSAHS患者整夜同步多道睡眠监测+咽喉pH监测+食管压力测量数据,研究呼吸紊乱指标、整夜咽喉pH平均值及食管压力指标相关性,并描述每次LPR事件出现时的睡眠周期、体位、食管压力变化以及与呼吸事件的关系.结果 ①19例OSAHS患者中LPR阳性者6例,共记录LPR事件63次;②LPR阳性患者OSAHS严重程度与咽喉pH平均值呈负相关,但未发现反流事件与呼吸事件之间存在明确时间上的一一对应的关系;③LPR阳性组与阴性组患者的食管压(t=3.211,P=0.007)和上食管括约肌压力(t=2.234,P=0.046)差异均有统计学意义;④所有患者整夜咽喉pH平均值与食管压力平均值呈正相关(r=0.592,P=0.033).结论 OSAHS患者严重程度与夜间咽喉部pH值密切相关.OSAHS患者夜间易发生胃食管反流,造成近端食管胃酸暴露增加,进一步增加发生LPR的概率.LPR阳性的OSAHS患者睡眠时静息上食管括约肌压力下降更为明显,可能也是导致反流的另一危险因素.     

Prevalence of pH-documented laryngopharyngeal reflux in Chinese patients with clinically suspected reflux laryngitis

PURPOSE: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is one of the main factors behind different laryngeal pathology according to the Western literature. Literature reported that the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Chinese population was considerably lower than that in Western countries. To date, however, there is no study to evaluate the prevalence of pH-documented LPR in the Chinese ethnicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We thus recruited 28 consecutive Chinese patients with reflux symptoms including globus, throat discomfort, throat clearing, chronic cough, or burping lasting more than 1 month in the preceding 1 year, together with stroboscopic evidence suggestive of reflux laryngitis according to the reflux finding score in our study. All patients underwent thorough head and neck examination and transnasal endoscopic assessment. The prevalence of pH-documented LPR and GERD was then documented using ambulatory 24-hour pH biprobe study. RESULTS: Six (21%) of the 28 patients had pH-documented LPR. Four (14%) of the 28 patients had GERD with 3 of them having concomitant LPR. Only burping was associated with pH-documented LPR (P < .05). No relationship was observed between pH-documented LPR and other factors, including age, sex, other reflux symptoms except burping, and the reflux finding score. CONCLUSION: Chinese patients do have and present with symptoms of extraesophageal reflux, and we observed a lower prevalence of pH-documented LPR in Chinese patients with clinically suspected reflux laryngitis compared with white patients.     

反流性咽喉炎与胃食管反流病的关系研究

目的 :探讨反流性咽喉炎与胃食管反流病 (GRED)发生的关系。方法 :对 130例顽固的慢性咽喉炎患者行胃镜检查或 2 4h食管 pH监测 ,将检测的GRED随机分为两组 ,治疗组 :应用抑胃酸药、促动力药和清热解毒治疗 ;对照组 :单用清热解毒的咽喉炎药 ,对两组咽喉部症状缓解及内镜下病理改善情况进行统计学比较。结果 :检出GRED 45例 (34 .6 % ) ,反流性咽喉炎的体征多样化 ,治疗组 2 3例 ,有效率 91.3% (2 1例 ) ,对照组 2 2例 ,有效率 13.6 % (3例 ) ,P <0 .0 1。结论 :GRED是导致反流性咽喉炎的重要病因 ,抑酸剂与促动力药、清热解毒药合用 ,可缓解或改善反流性咽喉炎的症状和病理。     

Otologic findings in children with gastroesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND: Nearly 90-95% of children with drool have physiologic gastroesophageal reflux (GER) that usually resolves by 12-15 months of age; however, 5-10% of children with drool have pathologic GER. Of these children, most recover clinically by 18 months of age without therapy, yet 10% develop chronic, recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with sequelae. The respiratory symptoms associated with GER consist mainly of bronchial asthma and laryngospasm, but often include a persistent cough of unknown aetiology, obstructive apnoea, and an obstructive respiratory syndrome confined to the nasopharynx. Gastric acid reflux, enters the adenoids, causes oedema of the tubal orifices, and later leads to relapsing diseases of the middle ear in children. AIM AND SCOPE: To evaluate the incidence of otologic manifestations in children with GER and the efficacy of treatment, comparing two different groups of children (i.e., treated versus untreated). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to November 2006, audiologic screening of newborns and suckling children (0-24 months of age) at risk for auditory illnesses was held at the University Department of Otolaryngology in Catania. Seventy-three children (average age, 13 months) were selected after failing acoustic otoemissions for chronic bilateral catarrhal pathology involving the middle ear (tympanometry type B) and were positive for at least one of the different signs of GER at the time of history-taking. The children were randomised and subdivided into two groups: (1) a group of 40 children (27 females and 13 males; average age, 12 months) who received treatment; and (2) a group of 29 children (16 males and 13 females; average age, 14 months) who did not receive treatment. Four children were lost to follow-up after completing the study. All children enrolled in the study underwent a rhinopharynxlaryngeal fibroscopy with flexible optics, a gastric ultrasound scan after clinical observation, and a multi-channel pH-metry for 18-24h. RESULTS: Findings obtained by rhinopharynxlaryngeal fibroscopy showed that 82% of cases had diffuse hyperaemia involving the entire rhinopharyngeal mucosa and 13% of the cases had arytenoidal hyperaemia. Resolution and improvement of the reflux occurred in 52.5 and 40% of the cases in the treated group, respectively, versus complete resolution and an improvement in symptoms of 45 and 30% of cases, respectively, in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis of a correlation between reflux and chronic middle otitis of the serous-mucous type was confirmed in the present study. Adopting a preventive treatment strategy may be useful in reducing the possibility of ear involvement.     

Association of reflux symptom index scores with gastroesophageal flap valve status

Objective

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a chronic symptom of mucosal damage caused by gastric acid reflux. Impaired gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) is one of the common etiologic factors of gastroesophageal reflux. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between GEFV, RSI, and GER in patients who underwent gastroesophageal endoscopy.

Methods

Two hundred and fifty seven consecutive patients with reflux symptoms (151 men and 106 women, mean age was 50.22 years) who underwent routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were enrolled to our study. GEFV was graded as I through IV according to the Hill's classification. Symptoms of laryngopharyngeal and upper gastrointestinal disease and endoscopic severity of esophageal injury were correlated with GEFV status. The GEFV was classified into two groups: normal GEFV group (grade I) and the abnormal GEFV group (grades II–III and IV). The reflux symptom index (RSI) was used as a diagnostic tool for LPR.

Results

Age, male gender, and body mass index were significantly related to an abnormal GEFV. The rate of abnormal grades of GEFV (Grade II + III + IV) was 31%. Age of normal and abnormal grades of GEFV (49.0/50.8 vs 52.9) and values of BMI (26.2/26.7 vs 26.5) were similar. RSI scores were correlated with gastroesophageal flap valve grades but RSI scores were not correlated with Los Angeles gastroesophageal reflux (GER) Classification. Moreover, gastroesophageal reflux grade of Los Angeles Classification was positively correlated with gastroesophageal flap valve grades.

Conclusion

Endoscopic grading of GEFV is a simple and useful technique which may provide an accurate diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux. Also, reflux symptom index (RSI) is a simple, economic and noninvasive diagnostic tool for gastroesophageal reflux. However, in this research, we did not find any correlation between reflux symptom index and degree of esophageal mucosal injury which was classified according to LA classification.     

Design and implementation of an ambulatory pH monitoring protocol in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Adding a hypopharyngeal sensor to esophageal pH monitoring has been advocated for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). However, selecting the proper pH catheter is problematic because esophageal lengths are variable among individuals. OBJECTIVE: To design and implement a new pH monitoring protocol for LPR. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: Design parameters were defined prospectively: single-probe, triple-sensor pH catheter with sensors located in the hypopharynx (1-3 cm above upper esophageal sphincter) and in proximal and distal esophagus (20 cm and 5 cm above lower esophageal sphincter, respectively). Esophageal lengths were determined in a study population undergoing esophageal manometry. Optimal pH sensor spacings were determined using the least number of catheters to satisfy the design parameters. The protocol was implemented in consecutive subjects with suspected LPR. RESULTS: Distribution of esophageal lengths was determined in 1,043 subjects. In 92% of the study population, three pH catheters (3-15, 6-15, and 9-15 sensor-spacings) would satisfy the design criteria. Forty-one subjects with suspected LPR underwent the pH protocol. An abnormal pH test was found in 40 subjects (98%) with triple-sensor combination compared with 29 subjects (71%) if only dual esophageal sensors were used. CONCLUSIONS: Single-probe pH monitoring of the hypopharynx and esophagus was feasible. Adding a hypopharyngeal pH sensor increased the detection of abnormal acid reflux more often than traditional dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring.     

Do the laryngopharyngeal symptoms and signs ameliorate by empiric treatment in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux?

Objectives

In clinical practice, antireflux medication is given almost always empirically without pH monitorization. We aimed to evaluate the improving effect of empiric antireflux treatment on layngopharyngeal symptoms and signs in patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) according to reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS).

Methods

GER was determined by esophagogastroduedonoscopy and biopsy in 127 patients. RSI and RFS were calculated for each patient. The patients with a pathology other than LFR which may be responsible from laryngopharyngeal symptoms and signs were excluded from the study. Fifty patients whom were thought to have LPR according to RSI and RFS comprised the study group. After 12-weeks of antireflux treatment, RSI and RFS were calculated again. The statistical analyses were made according to the changes in the severity and frequency of each symptom and sign.

Results

There was statistically significant improvement in RSI and RFS after treatment when compared with initial scores. There was statistically significant improvement in severity of all symptoms and signs. Although there was quantitively decrease in frequency of some signs and symptoms, complete resolution of the disease was not observed generally.

Conclusion

Empiric antireflux treatment according to RSI and RFS is an effective method. Antireflux treatment has a significant improving effect on laryngopharyngeal symptoms and signs. There may be needed longer times of treatment for complete resolution of symptoms and signs.     

Monitoring of gastric acid suppression in patients with extraesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE: Response to acid suppressive therapy varies in patients with extraesophageal esophageal reflux disease (EERD). Inadequate suppression of gastric acid may contribute to the observed differences in the response to the treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate suppression of gastric acid in EERD patients being treated with acid suppressive therapy. METHODS: Charts of patients with EERD who underwent dual channel 24h esophageal pH monitoring while receiving acid suppressive therapy between January 2002 and June 2004 were reviewed. Suppression of gastric acid was determined based on the number of acid reflux episodes, esophageal acid exposure, and acid clearance time. RESULTS: Twenty patients (12 male, 8 female, age range: 2-19 years) were identified. Esophageal pH monitoring was within normal limits, documenting complete acid suppression in nine patients (45%). Increased numbers of acid reflux episodes were observed in seven patients. In four patients, the number of acid reflux episodes was normal in spite of incomplete acid suppression. However, other abnormal pH monitoring parameters included delayed acid clearance in three patients and increased acid exposure time in three. The majority of patients also showed alkaline reflux. CONCLUSION: Esophageal pH monitoring documented incomplete acid suppression in this group of infants, children, adolescents and teens with EERD. Monitoring of gastric acid suppression can be useful in guiding the follow-up of EERD patients who receive acid suppressive therapy.     

Pharyngeal reflux in children with chronic otitis media with effusion

Objective—To investigate whether there is an association between chronic otitis media (COM) with effusion and pharyngeal reflux in children by using 24-h pH monitoring with a dual probe.

Material and Methods—This was a prospective study. The study group consisted of 25 children with COM with effusion and the control group comprised 12 healthy children. All children underwent 24-h esophageal pH monitoring with a dual probe (distal and proximal esophageal pH monitoring).

Results—In the study group, the frequencies of pharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) were 48% and 64%, respectively, and the corresponding values in the control group were 8.3% and 25%. Both of these differences were significant (p<0.05). In the study group, 28% of patients were positive for at least 1 symptom of GER; 72% of the patients did not have any symptoms but 56% of these patients had silent GER.

Conclusions—These findings indicate that pharyngeal reflux may play an important role in the etiology of COM with effusion. If patients have typical symptoms of GER, such as pyrosis, regurgitation, dysphagia and emesis, the presence of GER should be considered. The presence of silent GER and pharyngeal reflux should also be considered.