Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide : in moderate to severe hypertension

* The fixed-dose combination of irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is approved in the US for use as initial therapy in patients who are likely to need multiple agents to achieve their blood pressure (BP) goals. * In a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial in 538 patients with moderate hypertension that was untreated or uncontrolled by monotherapy, the mean reduction from baseline in seated systolic BP (SeSBP) at week 8 (primary endpoint) was significantly greater with irbesartan/HCTZ than with either irbesartan or HCTZ as monotherapy. * In addition, the proportion of patients with moderate hypertension achieving controlled BP (SeSBP < 140 mmHg/seated diastolic BP [SeDBP] < 90 mmHg) at 12 weeks was significantly greater with irbesartan/HCTZ combination therapy than with irbesartan or HCTZ monotherapy. * In a 7-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial in 697 patients with severe hypertension that was untreated or uncontrolled by monotherapy, a significantly greater proportion achieved a trough SeDBP of < 90 mmHg following 5 weeks of combination therapy with irbesartan/HCTZ compared with irbesartan monotherapy (primary endpoint). * Furthermore, the proportion of patients with severe hypertension achieving controlled BP of < 140/90 mmHg was significantly greater at all timepoints of the trial compared with irbesartan monotherapy. * Irbesartan/HCTZ combination therapy had a similar tolerability profile to irbesartan and HCTZ monotherapy. Most adverse events were of mild to moderate intensity.     

Effects of a fixed-dose ACE inhibitor-diuretic combination on ambulatory blood pressure and arterial properties in isolated systolic hypertension

The ideal therapy for patients with isolated systolic hypertension remains unclear; diuretics, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are all used in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether a fixed-dose ACE inhibitor/diuretic combination would reduce ambulatory blood pressures (BP) and arterial stiffness in isolated systolic hypertension more than antihypertensive monotherapy. In this randomized, double-blind study, 8 weeks of fosinopril/hydrochlorothiazide combination (10/12.5 mg titrated up to 20/12.5 mg) was compared with the calcium channel blocker (amlodipine, 5 mg titrated up to 10 mg) and diuretic (indapamide, 2.5 mg) monotherapy in 28 patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Each patient received all 3 therapies. Assessments included 24-hour ambulatory BP, clinic BP, and applanation tonometry-derived augmentation index. At 8 weeks, the fall in average 24-hour systolic BP and night time systolic BP were significantly greater in the fosinopril-hydrochlorothiazide group, compared to amlodipine and indapamide. The decrease in augmentation index and central aortic systolic BP was also greater in the fosinopril-hydrochlorothiazide group, compared to either amlodipine or indapamide. There was no difference between therapies in decrease in clinic systolic or diastolic BP, or diastolic ABP (average 24-h, diurnal, or nocturnal). Compared with either calcium channel blocker or diuretic therapy, a fixed-dose ACE inhibitor-diuretic combination induces greater reductions in systolic ABP, particularly at night, favorable effects that may be related to a decrease in the intensity of or delay in arterial wave reflections. ACE inhibitor-diuretic combination therapy is a useful approach to cardiovascular risk reduction in isolated systolic hypertension.     

Olmesartan medoxomil-based therapy for the management of hypertension

Contemporary practice guidelines for hypertension recommend a goal systolic/diastolic blood pressure (BP) of less than 140/90 mmHg for patients with hypertension and less than 130/80 mmHg for patients with diabetes mellitus or chronic kidney disease. Current guidelines recognize that most patients will require combination therapy to achieve these BP goals and recommend that the agents used in such therapy should have complementary mechanisms of action. Olmesartan medoxomil is an angiotensin receptor blocker approved for the treatment of hypertension as monotherapy or in combination with antihypertensive agents. It is also approved in a fixed-dose combination with hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine. Olmesartan medoxomil-based therapy can manage hypertension across a range of patient types and has demonstrated good BP-lowering efficacy and goal attainment in individuals with stage 1 or stage 2 hypertension. The comparative antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil, as monotherapy and as part of combination therapy, has been established in several large, randomized clinical trials. This review evaluates the chemistry, efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil-based therapy and its expanding role in hypertension management.     

奥美沙坦/氨氯地平复方制剂与缬沙坦/氨氯地平复方制剂治疗原发性高血压的网状meta分析

目的 采用网状meta分析评价奥美沙坦/氨氯地平复方制剂与缬沙坦/氨氯地平复方制剂治疗原发性高血压人群的效果。方法 检索数据库PubMed、万方、中国知网,根据纳入排除标准进行文献筛选,获得相关的临床随机对照试验。使用《Cochrane系统评价员手册》对文献进行风险偏倚评估。提取纳入研究信息,使用R3.4.3软件中的gemtc程序包、ITC软件进行网状meta分析及间接比较。结果 最终纳入9篇文献,总共纳入3 137例原发性高血压患者。奥美沙坦/氨氯地平复方制剂在收缩压的降压效果上优于缬沙坦/氨氯地平复方制剂[MD=3.2 mmHg,95%CI（0.548,5.852）,P=0.043],在舒张压的降压效果上,两者的效果相似[MD=0.1 mmHg,95%CI（-1.847,2.047）,P=0.919]。两者的血压达标率及不良反应发生率相当。结论 奥美沙坦/氨氯地平复方制剂在收缩压的降压效果上优于缬沙坦/氨氯地平复方制剂,在舒张压的降压效果上,两者的效果相似。     

Single-pill telmisartan and amlodipine: a rational combination for the treatment of hypertension

Despite the well documented benefits conferred by adequate control of hypertension, the majority of hypertensive patients display suboptimal control and few patients achieve blood pressure (BP) levels <140/90?mmHg. As a consequence, combination therapy will be required in the majority of patients to achieve target BP. Fixed-dose combinations of antihypertensives not only simplify treatment regimens, contributing to enhanced patient adherence, they provide superior BP-lowering efficacy and an improved tolerability profile. Fixed-dose combinations have become the strategy of choice in high-risk patients or those with stage 2-3 hypertension. The combination of a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) is a first-line combination that, in addition to its antihypertensive efficacy, reduces oedema, the main adverse effect of the dihydropyridine CCB and the main factor limiting their use. In morbidity/mortality studies, this fixed-dose combination has also demonstrated superiority over a RASI combined with a diuretic. The single-pill combination of telmisartan and amlodipine has been shown to produce a dose-dependent BP-lowering effect significantly greater than that of either agent administered as monotherapy. These findings have been confirmed by ambulatory BP monitoring in patients with stage 1 and 2 hypertension, which demonstrated that single-pill telmisartan/amlodipine provides substantial 24-hour BP-lowering efficacy. A higher proportion of patients achieved 24-hour BP goals of <130/80?mm?Hg on combination therapy. The superior efficacy of combination therapy has been demonstrated across a broad range of patients, including those with moderate-to-severe hypertension, diabetes mellitus and obesity. Moreover, combined use of telmisartan and amlodipine reduces the incidence of amlodipine-induced oedema, making it a preferred combination for the treatment of hypertension.     

Amlodipine/Valsartan: fixed-dose combination in hypertension

Amlodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, and valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, are established antihypertensive agents. Fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine/valsartan are available in several European countries and in the US. Individual dose titration with amlodipine and valsartan is generally recommended before changing to the fixed-dose combination. Amlodipine/valsartan, at approved dosage regimens, achieved significantly greater reductions in mean sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure (BP) than amlodipine or valsartan monotherapy, or placebo in two randomized, double-blind, factorial trials in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Approximately 80-90% of patients receiving approved dosages of amlodipine/valsartan achieved a response, defined as a mean sitting diastolic BP <90 mmHg or a >or= 10 mmHg reduction from baseline. Subgroup analyses of data from the two trials showed that the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine/valsartan in the elderly, Black patients and those with stage 2 hypertension was consistent with that observed in the overall study population. Marked reductions in BP were also observed in patients whose BP was previously uncontrolled on monotherapy (with various antihypertensives) who were switched (without washout) to amlodipine/valsartan in a phase IIIb-IV study. Amlodipine/valsartan was generally well tolerated in clinical trials. In particular, the incidence of peripheral oedema was significantly lower in patients receiving amlodipine/valsartan than in those treated with amlodipine monotherapy.     

Olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide: fixed-dose combination in hypertension

The antihypertensive agents olmesartan medoxomil, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) are now available as a fixed-dose combination tablet (olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine/HCTZ). In a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial (TRINITY) in adults with moderate to severe hypertension, olmesartan medoxomil?+?amlodipine?+?HCTZ triple combination therapy produced significantly greater least squares mean reductions from baseline in seated diastolic blood pressure (BP) [primary endpoint] and seated systolic BP than olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine, olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ or amlodipine?+?HCTZ. Furthermore, significantly more patients achieved BP goals and targets with the triple combination regimen than with any of the dual combination regimens at week 12, with olmesartan medoxomil?+?amlodipine?+?HCTZ also demonstrating benefit over the dual regimens in terms of ambulatory BP control. According to subgroup analyses of the TRINITY trial, olmesartan medoxomil?+?amlodipine?+?HCTZ was more effective in reducing BP and achieving BP goals than each of the dual therapies, irrespective of hypertension severity, age, sex, race or diabetes mellitus status. Data from a number of smaller clinical studies indicated that olmesartan medoxomil?+?amlodipine?+?HCTZ triple combination therapy provides antihypertensive efficacy in patients whose BP is not adequately controlled with olmesartan medoxomil?+?amlodipine. Olmesartan medoxomil?+?amlodipine?+?HCTZ was generally well tolerated in the TRINITY study, with adverse events usually being mild or moderate in severity.     

Evaluation of population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship with coadministration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil

Population pharmacokinetic models for amlodipine and olmesartan were developed using data collected from 4 phase I studies in healthy volunteers and 1 phase III study in subjects with mild to severe hypertension. A 2-compartment and a 1-compartment model best described the pharmacokinetics of olmesartan and amlodipine, respectively; both agents were characterized by first-order elimination/absorption and an absorption time lag. The analysis shows that neither agent had a clinically significant impact on the clearance of the other. The impact of covariates on the clearance of olmesartan and amlodipine was similar after coadministration of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil as separate entities or as a fixed-dose combination compared with monotherapy. The effect of exposure to amlodipine and olmesartan on the change in trough seated diastolic blood pressure was best described by linear and maximum effect (E(max)) models, respectively. Black race was the most important covariate in the exposure-response model, decreasing the maximal possible effect of olmesartan on blood pressure while increasing the effect of amlodipine, without influencing pharmacokinetic parameters. The drug effect of combination therapy was defined on the basis of exposure to both compounds and was greater than the effect of monotherapy with either agent.     

Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in the treatment of essential hypertension

Telmisartan is an angiotensin-II receptor blocker that has demonstrated efficacy in the reduction of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Patients with hypertension commonly require two or more antihypertensives to reduce their blood pressure to safe levels, and the choice of combination therapy should be informed by clinical trial data. Telmisartan is available in fixed-dose combination with hydrochlorothiazide (telmisartan/HCTZ) in doses of 40 mg/12.5 mg and 80 mg/12.5 mg. Telmisartan/HCTZ has been studied in a number of clinical trials in essential hypertension, for the most part using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. It has been compared with monotherapy in full patient populations and in non-responders, and has been compared with other drug combinations. Telmisartan/HCTZ provides significantly greater reductions in blood pressure than monotherapy, and significantly increases the percentage of patients who achieve target blood pressure. The reduction in blood pressure achieved by adding HCTZ to telmisartan is greater than that achieved by adding HCTZ to atenolol, despite the fact that telmisartan and atenolol monotherapy had similar efficacy. Telmisartan/HCTZ provides significantly greater reductions than losartan plus HCTZ in 24-h mean blood pressure, primarily due to a significantly greater effect in the risky, early morning hours. Telmisartan/HCTZ is effective and well-tolerated in the elderly, diabetics and African-American patients. Ongoing studies are comparing the efficacy of telmisartan/HCTZ with valsartan plus HCTZ and amlodipine plus HCTZ in overweight, hypertensive diabetics and in patients with isolated systolic hypertension – two patient groups who are particularly at risk of target organ damage.     

Fixed-dose combination enalapril/nitrendipine: a review of its use in mild-to-moderate hypertension

The fixed-dose combination of enalapril 10mg with nitrendipine 20mg combines an ACE inhibitor with a calcium channel antagonist (CCA) and is indicated for the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension whose blood pressure (BP) is inadequately controlled with enalapril or nitrendipine monotherapy. In randomised, double-blind clinical trials, enalapril/nitrendipine 10/20 mg/day was significantly more effective than its individual components in reducing diastolic BP (DBP) in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension inadequately controlled with enalapril 10 mg/day or nitrendipine 20 mg/day. The fixed-dose combination was similar in efficacy at reducing DBP to amlodipine 10 mg/day in patients who failed to achieve BP control with amlodipine 5 mg/day, and to losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5 mg/day in patients who received the combinations as first-line therapy. Enalapril/nitrendipine 10/20 mg produced a consistent antihypertensive effect that persisted for the entire 24-hour dosage interval as shown by ambulatory BP monitoring. Enalapril/nitrendipine 10/20 mg was well tolerated in clinical trials where it was administered to patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension for up to 12 weeks. The adverse events were those expected of ACE inhibitors and CCAs and included cough, headache and flushing. Evidence from clinical trials, including a pooled analysis, suggests that the incidence of oedema may be significantly lower with the fixed-dose combination than with CCA monotherapy.In conclusion, enalapril/nitrendipine 10/20 mg is a well tolerated fixed-dose combination of two established antihypertensive agents administered once daily that effectively lowers BP throughout the 24-hour dosage interval. Importantly, the fixed-dose combination may have a lower incidence of oedema than CCA monotherapy. Enalapril/nitrendipine 10/20 mg provides an additional treatment option for patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension for whom combination therapy is appropriate.     

Effect of three months' treatment with irbesartan on blood and pulse pressure of hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients: open, observational study in 31,793 patients

OBJECTIVES: In hypertensive diabetics the cardiovascular risk is substantially increased. Therefore, an effective reduction of both blood pressure and pulse pressure is of particular importance for these patients. The aim of the prospective observational study in hypertensive type 2 diabetics was to assess the effect of a switch from the previous antihypertensive therapy to the angiotensin-II-receptor antagonist irbesartan (alone or in combination with HCTZ) on the reduction of blood pressure and pulse pressure, the reduction of diabetic nephropathy (microalbuminuria), and tolerability. METHODS: 8714 general practitioners included 31,793 type 2 diabetics aged at least 18 years in an open observational study. After inclusion in to the study the patients received irbesartan 300 mg as monotherapy or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (HCTZ). Main outcome measures for efficacy were the reduction of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures, reduction of pulse pressure, and blood pressure responder (reduction in DBP > or = 10 mmHg or diastolic < 90 mmHg), diastolic normalization (DBP < 90 mmHg) and overall normalization rates (SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg) after 3 months. Further outcome measures included the reduction of microalbuminuria or proteinuria, and adverse events (AEs) as a measure of tolerability. RESULTS: Thirty-eight per cent of patients received irbesartan 300 mg and 61% irbesartan in combination with HCTZ. Mean systolic blood pressure was reduced by 22.5 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure by 10.7 mmHg (baseline values: 160.2 and 93.2 mmHg). Pulse pressure fell on average by 11.6 mmHg. 83.4% of the patients were responders, with an overall normalization rate of 42.7% (SBP < 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg), respectively 73.8% (DBP < 90 mmHg). The antihypertensive benefit was achieved irrespective of the previous medication. Mean albuminuria decreased by about 27.7 mg/L. Only 0.3% of patients experienced adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In type 2 diabetics with hypertension and either uncontrolled or no previous antihypertensive therapy a change to treatment with irbesartan or irbesartan/HCTZ for 3 months resulted in a distinct reduction of systolic and diastolic blood pressures, with concomitant effective reductions of pulse pressure and microalbuminuria.     

Comparison of monotherapy with irbesartan 150 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension.

OBJECTIVE. The primary objective of this study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin II receptor blocker irbesartan 150 mg and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine 5 mg in the treatment of patients with seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 95-110 mmHg. DESIGN. Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, comparative pilot study. METHODS. Subjects were 18-65 years of age, with DBP 95-110 mmHg, and of non-African American origin. Following a three week, single-blind, placebo lead-in period, 181 subjects were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive once-daily irbesartan 150 mg (n=89) or amlodipine 5 mg (n=92) for four weeks. Trough (24+/-3 hours post-dosing) BP measurements were obtained at baseline and at Weeks 2 and 4 under standardised, controlled conditions. Response was defined as DBP <90 mmHg or a reduction from baseline of 10 mmHg. RESULTS. After four weeks of treatment, the mean (+/-SE) decrease from baseline in DBP was 9.4+/-0.6 mmHg in the irbesartan group vs. 9.6+/-0.6 mmHg in the amlodipine group (p=0.806). The mean decrease from baseline in seated systolic BP was 12.2+/-1.0 mmHg in the irbesartan group vs. 12.0+/-1.0 mmHg in the amlodipine group (p=0.885). Overall, 62% of subjects in the irbesartan group and 63% in the amlodipine group had a response (p=0.609), and 54% and 56% of patients (p=0.596), respectively, had their DBP normalised (<90 mmHg). Adverse events were reported by 21.3% of patients receiving irbesartan and 20.7% receiving amlodipine. Conclusions. Irbesartan 150 mg demonstrated comparable efficacy to amlodipine 5 mg, thereby confirming its value as an antihypertensive treatment option in non-African American patients with DBP 95-110 mmHg.     

Long-term persistence with single-pill,fixed-dose combination therapy versus two pills of amlodipine and perindopril for hypertension: Australian experience

Objective: To study treatment persistence and mortality using a single-pill, fixed-dose combination tablet compared with a two-pill combination for hypertension.

Research design and methods: We analyzed Australian Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme records 2011–2014 in a 10% random sample of concessional patients prescribed concomitant amlodipine and perindopril – either as a single-pill, fixed-dose combination tablet (n?=?9340) or as two-pill combination therapy (n?=?3093). Main outcome measures were: (a) proportions failing to continue amlodipine?+?perindopril over time, (b) proportions failing to continue any subsequent calcium channel and angiotensin inhibition therapy over time and (c) proportions dying.

Results: After 12 months, 34% of single-pill and 57% of two-pill users discontinued amlodipine?+?perindopril, median persistence time 42 months versus 7 months; 28% and 47% respectively discontinued any calcium channel–angiotensin inhibition therapy. After 48 months, 8% of single-pill and 18% of two-pill users had died. In a multivariate model adjusted for age, gender, duration and intensity of prior hypertension therapy, initial dose of amlodipine and perindopril, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and complexity of care, the hazard ratio for risk of discontinuation over 42 months in the two-pill versus single-pill amlodipine?+?perindopril group was 1.94 (95% CI 1.83–2.06). The hazard ratio for discontinuation in two-pill versus single-pill users of any calcium channel–angiotensin inhibition therapy was 1.86 (1.74–1.99). The adjusted hazard ratio for risk of death over 48 months was 1.83 (1.55–2.16), but the mortality outcome may be an overestimate due to residual confounding.

Conclusions: Use of a single-pill, fixed-dose combination in hypertension is associated with superior persistence and reduced mortality compared with use of two pills, suggesting a higher priority for the use of fixed-dose combinations.     

Telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in the treatment of essential hypertension

Telmisartan is an angiotensin-II receptor blocker that has demonstrated efficacy in the reduction of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Patients with hypertension commonly require two or more antihypertensives to reduce their blood pressure to safe levels, and the choice of combination therapy should be informed by clinical trial data. Telmisartan is available in fixed-dose combination with hydrochlorothiazide (telmisartan/HCTZ) in doses of 40 mg/12.5 mg and 80 mg/12.5 mg. Telmisartan/HCTZ has been studied in a number of clinical trials in essential hypertension, for the most part using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. It has been compared with monotherapy in full patient populations and in non-responders, and has been compared with other drug combinations. Telmisartan/HCTZ provides significantly greater reductions in blood pressure than monotherapy, and significantly increases the percentage of patients who achieve target blood pressure. The reduction in blood pressure achieved by adding HCTZ to telmisartan is greater than that achieved by adding HCTZ to atenolol, despite the fact that telmisartan and atenolol monotherapy had similar efficacy. Telmisartan/HCTZ provides significantly greater reductions than losartan plus HCTZ in 24-h mean blood pressure, primarily due to a significantly greater effect in the risky, early morning hours. Telmisartan/HCTZ is effective and well-tolerated in the elderly, diabetics and African-American patients. Ongoing studies are comparing the efficacy of telmisartan/HCTZ with valsartan plus HCTZ and amlodipine plus HCTZ in overweight, hypertensive diabetics and in patients with isolated systolic hypertension - two patient groups who are particularly at risk of target organ damage.     

厄贝沙坦单用及合用治疗轻、中度原发性高血压60例

目的 :比较国产厄贝沙坦单用以及与非洛地平或雷米普利合用对轻、中度原发性高血压的降压疗效。方法 :6 0例轻、中度高血压病人 ,经 2wk安慰剂导入期后 ,单服厄贝沙坦 15 0mg ,qd。 4wk后随机分 2组 ,分别联合服用非洛地平 5mg ,qd ,或雷米普利 5mg ,qd ,均为 4wk。治疗前及治疗后 4wk和 8wk行 2 4h动态血压监测 ,并测治疗前后坐位血压。结果 :厄贝沙坦单用 4wk后 ,坐位血压和2 4h动态血压均下降 (P <0 .0 5或P <0 .0 1) ,收缩压和舒张压的谷峰比值为 0 .82和 0 .86。厄贝沙坦与非洛地平或雷米普利合用 4wk后 ,坐位血压总有效率从 4 0 %增加为 89%和 70 % ;动态血压显示联合用药降压作用较明显。结论 :厄贝沙坦单用有长效的降压作用 ,与非洛地平或雷米普利联合用药有叠加降压作用     

Olmesartan medoxomil: a review of its use in the management of hypertension

Olmesartan medoxomil (Olmetec, Benicar) is an angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonist (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]) that inhibits the actions of angiotensin II on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, which plays a key role in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Oral olmesartan medoxomil 10-40 mg once daily is recommended for the treatment of adult patients with hypertension. In those with inadequate BP control using monotherapy, fixed-dose olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) [Olmetec plus, Benicar-HCT] combination therapy may be initiated. Extensive clinical evidence from several large well designed trials and the clinical practice setting has confirmed the antihypertensive efficacy and good tolerability profile of oral olmesartan medoxomil, as monotherapy or in combination with HCTZ, in patients with hypertension, including elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). Notably, BP control is sustained throughout the 24-hour dosage interval, including during the last 4 hours of this period. In clinical trials, olmesartan medoxomil monotherapy provided better antihypertensive efficacy than losartan, candesartan cilexetil or irbesartan monotherapy, and was at least as effective as valsartan treatment, with a faster onset of action than other ARBs in terms of reductions from baseline in diastolic BP (DBP) and, in most instances, systolic BP (SBP). Combination therapy with olmesartan medoxomil plus HCTZ was superior to that with benazepril plus amlodipine, as effective as that with losartan plus HCTZ, noninferior to that with atenolol plus HCTZ, but less effective than that with telmisartan plus HCTZ, in individual trials. Data from ongoing clinical outcome trials are required to more fully determine the relative position of olmesartan medoxomil therapy in the management of hypertension. In the meantime, the consistent antihypertensive efficacy during the entire 24-hour dosage interval and good tolerability profile of olmesartan medoxomil, with or without HCTZ, make it a valuable option for the treatment of adult patients with hypertension, including the elderly.     

厄贝沙坦与氨氯地平治疗2型糖尿病合并高血压的临床探讨

目的:分析厄贝沙坦与氨氯地平治疗2型糖尿病合并高血压的临床疗效。方法:选取某院2016年9月~2018年11月于门诊就诊的2型糖尿病合并高血压患者66例,进行计算机抽样分组。对照组患者31例给予单纯氨氯地平进行治疗,研究组患者35例在对照组基础上加以厄贝沙坦联合治疗,对两组患者治疗前后血糖水平、舒张压和收缩压、治疗疗效以及不良反应等进行分析观察。结果:研究组患者治疗前空腹血糖、餐后2h血糖水平和对照组差异不大(P>0.05),治疗后差异显著(P<0.05);研究组患者治疗前血压水平(收缩压、舒张压)与对照组差异不明显(P>0.05),治疗后差异显著(P<0.05);治疗疗效上研究组为94.29%(33/35),对照组为77.42%(24/31),组间差异较大(P<0.05);研究组不良反应胃肠道反应1例、头晕1例,对照组胃肠道反应1例、头晕1例,恶心1例,组间差异并无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:针对2型糖尿病患者合并高血压给予氨氯地平联合厄贝沙坦治疗后取得良好成效,可有效提高治疗疗效,在控制血压的同时还能改善血糖水平,同时还具有较高安全性,临床上值得推广应用。     

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamic interaction of coadministered amlodipine and atorvastatin in 1660 patients with concomitant hypertension and dyslipidemia: the respond trial

Guidelines stress the importance of the simultaneous management of multiple cardiovascular risk factors. This can in part be achieved by coadministration of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive treatments. Potential pharmacodynamic interaction between drugs should be investigated as part of developing single-pill combinations. The Respond trial assessed whether combining amlodipine to treat hypertension and atorvastatin to treat dyslipidemia affected the action of either monotherapy. A total of 1660 hypertensive patients with dyslipidemia received 1 of 15 combinations of amlodipine (placebo, 5, or 10 mg) and atorvastatin (placebo, 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg) in a 3 x 5 factorial randomized, placebo-controlled design. At 8 weeks, combination-treated patients experienced dose-related and statistically significant reductions in systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and Framingham risk score. Overall, coadministered atorvastatin and amlodipine was well tolerated and without adverse pharmacodynamic interaction; combination treatment did not affect the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering efficacy and safety of atorvastatin, or the systolic blood pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of amlodipine.     

Telmisartan/Amlodipine

Telmisartan/amlodipine is a single-pill combination of telmisartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, and amlodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, which is taken orally once daily for the treatment of hypertension. In the US and the EU, single-pill telmisartan/amlodipine can be used as a replacement for separate telmisartan and amlodipine tablets, and by patients not achieving BP goals with amlodipine monotherapy. In addition, the US indication includes patients not achieving BP goals with telmisartan (or another angiotensin II receptor antagonist or calcium channel antagonist other than amlodipine) alone, and as initial therapy in patients considered likely to require multiple drugs to achieve their BP goals. In an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, factorial-design, placebo-controlled, multicenter study in adult patients with hypertension (n =1461), mean DBP was reduced from baseline to a significantly greater extent in recipients of telmisartan 40 or 80mg/day plus amlodipine 5 or 10mg/day than in those receiving equivalent dosages of telmisartan or amlodipine monotherapy. Single-pill telmisartan/amlodipine recipients had significantly greater reductions in BP than telmisartan or amlodipine monotherapy recipients in an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study in adult patients with severe hypertension (n = 858), and in four 8-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trials in patients who had not responded to amlodipine (n = 1097, 947, and 531) or telmisartan (n = 314) monotherapy. Telmisartan/amlodipine was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, including two 36-week follow-up studies.     

Bisoprolol/amlodipine combination therapy improves blood pressure control in patients with essential hypertension following monotherapy failure

Objective: The efficacy of a bisoprolol/amlodipine fixed-dose combination (FDC) in patients with essential hypertension who had not responded to bisoprolol or amlodipine monotherapy was investigated.

Research design and methods: In an 18 week, multicenter, randomized, comparative phase III study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01977794), patients with blood pressure uncontrolled by bisoprolol or amlodipine monotherapy (5?mg OD) began treatment with bisoprolol/amlodipine FDC 5/5?mg OD. Patients with controlled blood pressure (BP) at week 6/12 continued at current FDC strength, and patients with uncontrolled BP received FDC dose uptitration (maximum dose: 10/10?mg). The primary efficacy endpoint was change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at week 18 versus baseline (corresponding to SBP under monotherapy), and secondary endpoints included change from baseline in SBP after week 6/12 and percentage of BP-controlled patients at week 6, 12 and 18. Safety was assessed by number/types of adverse events (AEs).

Results: Two hundred patients were randomized to treatment (100 with uncontrolled BP under bisoprolol and 100 under amlodipine monotherapy). Overall, 196 patients were eligible for analysis. The patient groups displayed similar mean SBP reductions from baseline by study end (bisoprolol monotherapy failure: 25.9?±?12.82?mmHg reduction; amlodipine monotherapy failure: 24.7?±?11.67?mmHg reduction; p?<?0.001 for both). Overall mean SBP decreased by 25.3?±?12.25?mmHg (p?<?0.001). Mean heart rate reductions were also observed (bisoprolol monotherapy failure: 6.6?±?9.67 bpm reduction; amlodipine monotherapy failure: 11.5?±?8.65 bpm reduction; p?<?0.001 for both). Most patients (83.2%) displayed BP control with bisoprolol/amlodipine 5/5?mg at 6 weeks. Treatment was well tolerated at all dose levels; treatment-related AEs (mostly of mild/moderate intensity) were reported by 52.5% of patients, with no severe or serious treatment-related AEs reported. As the study focused on hypertension, total cardiovascular risk was not assessed.

Conclusions: Bisoprolol/amlodipine FDC therapy is associated with significant BP improvements in patients with essential hypertension following monotherapy failure.