Improving patient outcomes to targeted therapies in melanoma

Introduction: The arrival of targeted therapies has led to significant improvements in clinical outcomes for patients with BRAFV600 mutated advanced melanoma over the past five years.

Areas Covered: In several clinical trials, BRAF and MEK inhibitors have shown improvement in progression free and overall survival, along with much higher tumor response rates in comparison to chemotherapy, with the combination of these drugs superior to monotherapy. These agents are also being tested in earlier-stage patients, in addition to alternative dosing regimens and in combinations with other therapeutics. Efforts are also ongoing to expand the success found with targeted therapies to other subtypes of melanoma, including NRAS and c-kit mutated melanomas, uveal melanomas, and BRAF/NRAS wild type melanomas.

Expert Commentary: We aim to provide an overview of clinical outcomes with targeted therapies in melanoma patients.     

The safety and efficacy of cobimetinib for the treatment of BRAF V600E or V600K melanoma

Introduction: In the recent years, melanoma patients’ outcome and survival improved, mainly because of systemic treatment improvement with targeted therapy and checkpoint blockade. Targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was approved to treat patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma, harboring BRAF V600 mutations. This paper addresses the safety and efficacy of cobimetinib, when used in combination with vemurafenib, in the previous mentioned setting.

Areas covered: This article presents an overview on the rationale for clinical development of cobimetinib, as well as the mechanism of action, the efficacy and safety, and the most important trials that led to the approval of the combination therapy with vemurafenib. We searched the PubMed for published papers related to safety and efficacy of cobimetinib, and resistance mechanisms to BRAF inhibition. The abstract databases of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology were also searched for updates on the mentioned clinical trials.

Expert commentary: Patients treated with targeted therapy experience a rapid tumor response. However, virtually all patients will develop resistance to treatment. Therapeutic combinations to overcome resistance mechanisms are currently addressed. In the future, targeted therapy strategy will include three or more drugs, probably from different therapeutic classes.     

Radiosurgery/stereotactic radiotherapy in combination with immunotherapy and targeted agents for melanoma brain metastases

Introduction: The clinical landscape of advanced melanoma drastically changed after the introduction of both targeted therapies and immunotherapy. This rapid development in systemic therapies led to a change in the management of patients with brain metastases, with the subsequent need to re-assess the role of local therapies, in particular stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

Areas covered: In this non-systematic review, we report on the current knowledge on the use of SRS in combination with immunotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors for patients with melanoma brain metastases, as well as ongoing trials in this field.

Expert commentary: It is now more common to observe patients with melanoma brain metastases with better performance status and prolonged life expectancy. A combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, in different sequences, has been shown to be feasible and well tolerable, on the basis of retrospective reports. Additional data from ongoing prospective trials are however needed to confirm or not these findings and better explore the efficacy of the combination.     

How to use neoadjuvant medical treatment to maximize surgery in melanoma

Introduction: The aim of this work is to discuss the role of neoadjuvant therapy in melanoma patients, namely the potential to improve control and surgical resectability of locoregional disease. Moreover, potential survival benefits for high-risk stage III and IV melanoma patients will be addressed.

Areas covered: In this review, the different available neoadjuvant treatments including chemotherapy, bio-chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and local therapy will be presented and discussed. The PubMed published articles were identified and searched using the following terms located in the publication title: neoadjuvant therapy and melanoma. Studies investigating targeted therapy, immunotherapy and local melanoma treatments were included. Clinicaltrial.gov was also used as a source for recruiting or ongoing but not recruiting neoadjuvant clinical trials, for which no published results are available.

Expert commentary: Targeted therapy and immunotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting are still under investigation and not yet approved, however several neoadjuvant trials are ongoing. Shortly, results from these trials will answer the question whether neoadjuvant treatment translates into survival benefit and improves local disease control in stage III and IV melanoma patients. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy will play as relevant a role as in the metastatic setting, whereas chemotherapy will be used seldom.     

Therapeutic approaches for T790M mutation positive non-small-cell lung cancer

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a subset of lung cancer with demonstrated response to targeted therapies. However, resistance to the first targeted approach usually occurs within the first year, and it is associated in 50–60% of cases to the T790M resistance mutation.

Areas covered: The review provides an overview on the significance of the presence of the T790M mutation, its detection, treatment options and subsequent mechanisms of resistance.

Expert commentary: Osimertinib is the current treatment option for T790M mutation positive NSCLC after progression to first or second-generation EGFR TKIs, with activity also on brain metastasis. However, the scenario is in continuous evolution and results from clinical trials are awaited in first-line setting and in combination strategies.     

Myoglobin does not predict local toxicity in isolated limb perfusion

Introduction: Isolated limb perfusion (ILP) is a treatment option for patients with in-transit metastases of malignant melanoma in the extremities, as well as locally advanced sarcoma. ILP allows for a delivery of high-dose chemotherapy to an isolated extremity with minimal systemic toxicity. However, local toxicity like oedema, blistering, nerve damage and compartment syndrome can occur. Myoglobin measurements have been used as a screening method to predict the most severe cases of local toxicity. The aim was to investigate if myoglobin is a predictive factor for local toxicity after ILP in patients with melanoma in-transit metastases.

Methods: One hundred and ninety-three patients were treated for the first time with ILP for in-transit metastases between 2001 and 2015. Myoglobin was measured once the first hours after the perfusion (POD0), and for the first five post-operative days (POD1-5). Local toxicity was graded according to Wieberdink, and grouped in mild (I and II), moderate (III), and severe (IV and V). Wieberdink-groups were compared with myoglobin measurements, and myoglobin measurements were compared between gender, perfusion time, perfusion temperature and cannulated vessels.

Results: There is no statistically significant difference in myoglobin serum levels during the first five days post perfusion between patients suffering from mild, moderate or severe local toxicity. There is no difference between toxicity groups when it comes to distribution of sex, tumour size, or tumour numbers.

Conclusion: Levels of myoglobin do not predict local toxicity for patients with melanoma in-transit metastases treated with ILP when measured during the first five post-operative days.     

Ipilimumab in melanoma

Introduction: The treatment of melanoma is evolving rapidly over the past few years. Patients with BRAFv600 mutations can be treated with a combination of a BRAF-inhibitor and an MEK-inhibitor. Patients with BRAF wild-type tumors and BRAFv600 mutated tumors can be treated with immunotherapy i.e. check point inhibitors.

Areas covered: We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on the efficacy and predictive markers, safety, and pharmacoeconomics of ipilimumab in melanoma

Expert commentary: Ipilimumab was the first check point inhibitor reaching the clinic, gaining FDA and EMA approval for metastatic melanoma in 2011. Ipilimumab was also approved by FDA in the adjuvant setting for patients with high risk, stage III melanoma. The anti-PD1 directed antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab are superior to single agent ipilimumab, which is no longer considered the standard first line treatment in metastatic melanoma.

The addition ipilimumab to nivolumab is associated with a higher response rate and a better PFS, particularly in patients with PD-L1 negative tumors, albeit at the cost of a steep increase in grade 3–4 adverse event rate. Definitive survival data on this combination are pending and the selection of patients potentially requiring the combination and its pharmacoeconomic implications are to be elucidated.     

Update on medical treatment of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors

Introduction: Small intestinal (SI) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are relatively rare tumors. Due to the lack of symptom or specific symptoms, SI-NETs are often diagnosed at an advanced stage, making therapy challenging. The management of patients with advanced stage SI-NETS requires a multidisciplinary approach that combines surgical and medical treatment including novel targeted molecular therapies.

Areas covered: This article summarizes current strategies for the medical treatment of SI-NETS.

Expert commentary: The treatment plan of advanced-stage SI-NETs should be tailored in a case-by-case manner with the adoption of a multidisciplinary approach that combines different treatment options, including biological targeted therapies. In particular, we believe that the identification of the optimal treatment sequence(s), correct treatment timing and the selection of patients eligible to different treatments need specific investigation in controlled clinical trials.     

Adjuvant therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma

Introduction: Locally advanced, non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is conventionally managed with surgery. However, patients are at a high risk of RCC recurrence and have poor survival outcomes. An effective adjuvant systemic treatment is needed to improve on these outcomes. Targeted molecular and immune-based therapies have been investigated, or are under investigation, but their role in this setting remains unclear.

Areas covered: A comprehensive search of PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for relevant literature. The following topics pertinent to adjuvant therapy in RCC were evaluated: strategies for patient selection, cytokine-based immunotherapy, vaccine therapy, VEGF and non-VEGF targeted molecular agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Expert commentary: Strong evidence for the incorporation of adjuvant therapy in high-risk RCC is lacking. Multiple targeted molecular therapies have been examined with only one approved for use. Genetic and molecular-based prognostic models are needed to determine who may benefit from adjuvant therapy. Developing adjuvant therapy strategies in the future depends on the results of important ongoing trials with immunotherapy and targeted agents.     

Chemotherapy rechallenge after regorafenib treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: still hope after the last hope?

Introduction: The introduction of biological agents in cancer therapy is changing the progression of metastatic colorectal cancer. Currently, resistance to biological agents is an emerging problem; the progression of the disease is caused by the development of resistant clones. According to some authors, these clones can be re-sensitized to traditional and previously utilized chemotherapy agents. The results of the CORRECT study demonstrated the efficacy of regorafenib monotherapy in both KRAS wild type and mutant pretreated patients (pts). Two recent reports showed the potential of reintroduction of chemotherapy, even after treatment with regorafenib.

Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective review of clinical data from patients treated with regorafenib at our institution between March 2012 and March 2013. We analysed patient characteristics, KRAS/NRAS status, response to treatment (evaluated by RECIST v1.1 criteria) and survival.

Results: Regorafenib was administered to 128 patients, and 11 (8.6%) received post-regorafenib therapy (to our knowledge). Seven (63.6%) patients were wild type for KRAS/NRAS. Post-regorafenib therapy represented for all the patients at least the fourth line: all the pts received both oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy, all of them were treated with bevacizumab, and 7 patients also received cetuximab. Eight patients (72.7%) were treated with standard chemotherapy after regorafenib (irinotecan monotherapy, capecitabine plus oxaliplatin or irinotecan, dacarbazine or raltitrexed), while 3 patients received an experimental therapy (clinical trial). Nine of the 11 (81.8%) patients had PD and 2 patients had SD. The median progression-free survival was 1.6+ months (range 0.5–3.5), the median OS post-regorafenib was 2.1+ months (range 0.5–10.2) and the 6-month OS was 27.3%.

Conclusion: Our retrospective analysis showed that after regorafenib therapy, re-introduction of chemotherapy is possible. Unfortunately, we reported a high percentage of disease progression beyond regorafenib, which is likely due to the high percentage of heavily pretreated patients (some received four or five types of therapy before regorafenib). We think that regorafenib could represent a chemotherapy resensitizing agent; however, additional studies are needed in patients who have received less pretreatment.     

Risk-reduction and treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), a common adverse effect of several chemotherapeutic agents, has a significant impact on quality of life and may even compromise treatment efficacy, requiring chemotherapy dose reduction or discontinuation. CIPN is predominantly related with sensory rather than motor symptoms and the most common related cytotoxic agents are platinum compounds, taxanes and vinca alkaloids. CIPN symptoms may resolve after treatment cessation, but they can also be permanent and continue for years.

Areas covered: We present an overview of CIPN pathophysiology, clinical assessment, prevention and treatment identified through a Pubmed search.

Expert commentary: No substantial progress has been made in the last few years within the field of prevention and/or treatment of CIPN, in spite of remarkable efforts. Continuous research could expand our knowledge about chemotherapeutic-specific neuropathic pathways and eventually lead to the conception of innovative and targeted agents for the prevention and/or treatment of this debilitating chemotherapy adverse effect.     

Anti-GD2 immunotherapy for neuroblastoma

Introduction: Current therapeutic approaches for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NB) include high-dose chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy; interventions that are associated with long and short-term toxicities. Effective immunotherapy holds particular promise for improving survival and quality of life by reducing exposure to cytotoxic agents. GD2, a surface glycolipid is the most common target for immunotherapy.

Areas covered: We review the status of anti-GD2 immunotherapies currently in clinical use for neuroblastomas and novel GD2-targeted strategies in preclinical development.

Expert commentary: Anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies are associated with improved survival in patients in their first remission and are increasingly being used for chemorefractory and relapsed neuroblastoma. As protein engineering technology has become more accessible, newer antibody constructs are being tested. GD2 is also being targeted by natural killer cells and T-cells. Active immunity can be elicited by anti-GD2 vaccines. The rational combination of currently available and soon-to-emerge immunotherapeutic approaches, and their integration into conventional multimodality therapies will require further investigation to optimize their use for HR-NB.     

Risk factors for acute kidney injury associated with the treatment of bacterial endocarditis at a tertiary academic medical center*

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of endocarditis.

Objective: To determine risk factors for the development of AKI in patients treated for endocarditis.

Methods: This single centre, retrospective univariate and multivariate analysis to determine risk factors for the development of AKI included patients diagnosed with endocarditis between January 2009 and October 2013.

Results: Of 211 included patients, a total of 84 (39.8%) patients developed AKI. We identified multiple independent variables associated with the development of AKI, including: age ≥ 65 years, presence of hardware, chronic kidney disease, AKI on admission, infection with Staphylococcus spp, receipt of nafcillin or oxacillin or aminoglycoside and nafcillin or oxacillin or aminoglycoside and vancomycin, vancomycin trough level ≥ 20.0 mcg/ml, aminoglycoside total daily dose reduction, duration of vancomycin exceeding three days, receipt of loop diuretic or more than three concomitant nephrotoxins and duration of loop diuretic or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy exceeding seven days.

Conclusions: In patients treated for endocarditis, multiple risk factors for AKI were identified. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate these variables for causation of AKI in patients treated for endocarditis.     

Radiofrequency ablation combined with percutaneous ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) are important treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not eligible for resection and liver transplantation. Therefore, it is important to establish comparisons between RFA, PEI and the two therapies in combination.

Aims: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combined RFA-PEI versus monotherapy with either RFA or PEI for HCC to provide references for clinical practice and further research.

Methods: We searched all eligible studies published before September 2015 in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Chinese databases, such as CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang and also retrieved papers from other sources. All relevant controlled trials were collected. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.3 software (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).

Results: Thirteen trials with 1621 patients were identified. Compared with PEI, RFA was associated with significant improvement in overall survival (OS) rate at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, cancer-free survival (CFS) rate at 1, 2 and 3 years and complete tumour necrosis. RFA was associated with a significant reduction in the local recurrence rate at 1, 2 and 3 years. However, RFA was also associated with a higher total risk of complications. Compared with RFA alone, combined RFA-PEI was associated with a significant improvement in the OS rate at 1.5, 2 and 3 years and a significant reduction in the local recurrence rate. However, combined RFA-PEI was also associated with a higher risk of fever.

Conclusion: The combination of RFA and PEI appears to be the optimal treatment strategy when considering combined RFA-PEI or either RFA or PEI alone. Combined RFA-PEI significantly improves OS and reduces the risk of local recurrence without increasing major complications. Further large-scale studies are needed to assess economic outcomes and quality of life.     

Recent advances in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer (PC) demonstrates very poor prognosis and its incidence continues to increase, despite developments in chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapies. Surgical resection is currently the only curative approach for PC. The role of radiotherapy in adjuvant and locally advanced PC continues to be increasingly controversial. This review article aims to explore the current knowledge of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, focusing on diagnosis, treatment strategies, and the best supportive care.

Areas covered: The current literature on pancreatic adenocarcinoma treatment modalities has been summarized, with a focus on clinical trials and reviews. New treatment strategies and their impact on clinical practice have also been discussed.

Expert commentary: Despite many therapeutic developments, only modest improvements in survival rates have been achieved. There is an essential need to increase survival by developing more innovative treatment approaches for patients with PC.     

Therapeutic approaches for refractory germ cell cancer

Introduction: Most germ cell cancer patients with metastatic disease are cured by cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. 30% of metastatic patients will develop relapse or progress despite adequate first-line treatment and will require salvage therapy, with about 10% of metastasized patients ultimately developing platinum-resistant and fatal disease.

Areas covered: Based on a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and conference proceedings of ESMO, ASCO and EAU meetings, this review provides an overview on current and potential future treatment options for platinum-refractory germ cell cancer patients including cytostatics and molecularly targeted therapies.

Expert commentary: Treatment of platinum-refractory disease remains challenging and long-term survival is rarely achieved despite multimodal treatment approaches. Targeted treatment approaches do not yet play a role in the treatment of platinum-refractory disease due to lacking efficacy in small, unselected clinical trials. Inclusion of patients into clinical trials is strongly recommended.     

Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy

Introduction: In the era of minimally-invasive surgery, urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP) still represents a troublesome issue for a considerable rate of patients. Factors associated with the risk of post-RP UI, need to be carefully assessed throughout the overall clinical management process thus including the pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative setting.

Areas covered: This review analyses current published evidences regarding clinical and surgical aspects associated with urinary continence (UC) recovery after RP. A careful evaluation of patient’s clinical characteristics should be carried out before surgery in order to properly counsel the patients regarding the risk of UI. In the last two decades, the advent of robotic surgery has led to an overall improvement of functional outcomes after RP, thanks to the development of different surgical strategies based on either the ‘preservation’ or the ‘reconstruction’ of the anatomical elements responsible for urinary continence.

Finally, several therapeutic strategies including either a conservative approach, or pharmacological and surgical treatments, should be carefully considered for the post-operative management of UI.

Expert commentary: A comprehensive pre-operative patient’s clinical assessment, along with a proper and well-conducted surgical procedure and an effective post-operative care management are essential element to achieve a high probability of UC recovery.     

The safety and efficacy of olaparib therapy in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer

Introduction: PARP inhibition is an exciting new anticancer strategy. Olaparib has recently obtained a first in class license in Europe and the USA for the treatment of relapsed BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer.

Areas covered: We review the key preclinical and clinical data surrounding its use in the maintenance setting.

Expert commentary: We also consider the market profile, regulatory issues surrounding the agent and offer a five year speculative viewpoint of its future development in ovarian cancer.     

Nivolumab in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Introduction: The prognosis of recurrent/metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) after failure of first line chemotherapy is dismal. Until the publication of the results of CheckMate 141, not a single agent provided any survival benefit as a second line treatment for R/M HNSCC.

Areas covered: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted on the role of nivolumab in HNSCC.

Expert commentary: Nivolumab is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients based on the results of CheckMate 141 showing an overall survival benefit as compared to standard care (single agent docetaxel, methotrexate, or cetuximab). Of particular interest are immune-related adverse events which should be managed according to published guidelines.