The pharmacokinetics of morphine and morphine glucuronide metabolites after subcutaneous bolus injection and subcutaneous infusion of morphine

AIMS: To investigate the pharmacokinetics of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) in healthy volunteers after the administration of morphine by subcutaneous bolus injection (s.c.b.) and subcutaneous infusion (s.c. i.) over 4 h, and to compare the results with the intravenous bolus (i.v.) administration of morphine. METHODS: Six healthy volunteers each received 5 mg morphine sulphate by i.v., s.c.b. and short s.c.i. over 4 h, on three separate occasions, in random order, each separated by at least 1 week. Plasma samples were assayed for morphine, M6G and M3G. RESULTS: After i.v. morphine, the concentrations of morphine, M6G and M3G and their pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to those we have observed previously, in other healthy volunteers (when standardized to nmol l- 1, for a 10 mg dose to a 70 kg subject). After s.c.b. morphine, similar results were obtained except that the median tmax values for morphine and M3G were significantly longer than after i.v. morphine (P< 0.001 and P< 0.05, respectively), with a trend to a longer tmax for M6G (P = 0. 09). The appearance half-lives after s.c.b. morphine for M6G and M3G were also significantly longer than after i.v. morphine (P = 0.03 and P< 0.05, respectively). Comparison of log-transformed AUC values indicated that i.v. and s.c.b. administration of morphine were bioequivalent with respect to morphine, M6G and M3G. In comparison with i.v. morphine, morphine by s.c.i. was associated with significantly longer median tmax values for morphine (P< 0.001), M6G (P< 0.001) and M3G (P< 0.05), and the mean standardized Cmax values significantly lower than after both i.v. and s.c.b. morphine (morphine P< 0.001, M6G P< 0.001 and M3G P< 0.01 for each comparison). Comparison of log-transformed AUC values after i.v. and s.c.i. morphine indicated that the two routes were not bioequivalent for morphine (log-transformed AUC ratio 0.78, 90% CI 0.66-0.93), M6G (0.72, 90% CI 0.63-0.82), or M3G (0.65, 90% CI 0.54-0.78). A small stability study indicated no evidence of adsorptive losses from morphine infused over 4 h using the infusion devices from the study. CONCLUSIONS: Although bioequivalence was demonstrated between the s. c.b. and i.v. routes of morphine administration, the bioavailabilities of morphine, M6G and M3G after s.c.i. were significantly lower than after i.v. administration. However, despite this, the study demonstrates that the subcutaneous route is an effective method for the parenteral administration of morphine.     

Transdermal administration of morphine to healthy subjects.

1. Twelve healthy subjects received 10 mg morphine HCl delivered transdermally from an occlusive reservoir applied to a small area of skin, painlessly de-epithelialised by vacuum suction. On a separate occasion, 10 mg morphine HCl was given as an i.v. infusion over 20 min. 2. Venous blood samples were collected serially for 72 h and assayed for morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) by h.p.l.c. Pupil size, salivation, and central nervous effects (nausea, fatigue, headache, feeling of heaviness and dysphoria/euphoria) were also measured. 3. After transdermal application morphine was absorbed by a first-order process to produce relatively constant plasma drug concentrations over 11 h. The absolute bioavailability of transdermal morphine was 75% (65-85%; 95% CI). The plasma concentrations of both M6G and M3G were lower after transdermal administration than after i.v. infusion, and a considerable delay (of up to 1 h) was observed before the metabolites were detectable. AUC ratios for M3G and M6G relative to morphine were similar after both modes of administration. 4. Non-analgesic effects were less pronounced at the lower plasma drug and metabolite concentrations observed after transdermal delivery than after the i.v. infusion of morphine. 5. Transdermal administration of morphine warrants investigation as an alternative route of morphine delivery.     

Morphine hydrochloride suppositories. I. Bioavailability of morphine hydrochloride suppositories in rats

Bioavailabilities of morphine after rectal administration of three different morphine-HCl suppositories (5 mg/kg) were evaluated in rats. The suppositories were prepared with three fatty bases (Witepsol H-15, Witepsol W-35, Suppocire AT) by the fusion method. The plasma and brain concentrations of morphine and its metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. The bioavailabilities of morphine after rectal administration were compared with those after intravenous and oral administration of morphine.HCl solution (5 mg/kg). The plasma levels of morphine after rectal administration of morphine.HCl solution were higher than those after oral administration, whereas the plasma levels of metabolite, morphine-3-glucuronide was lower than those after oral administration. Morphine after rectal administration of Witepsol H-15 suppository released more easily than other suppositories. The inter-animal variation in the plasma levels of morphine after rectal administration of Witepsol H-15 suppository was smaller than those of other suppositories. Results obtained in this study indicate that morphine.HCl suppository prepared with Witepsol H-15 is a promising material as preparation of suppositories.     

Plasma morphine-3-glucuronide, morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine concentrations in patients receiving long-term epidural morphine.

Plasma morphine concentrations were measured in five cancer patients receiving long-term epidural morphine administration. Peak concentrations were observed within 1 h of dosage and concentrations then declined biexponentially. Plasma morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) concentrations were measured in two patients and plasma M3G concentrations were observed to be much higher than plasma M6G and morphine concentrations. Peak plasma M6G concentrations occurred within 1.0 h of dosing and plasma M6G concentrations then remained higher than plasma morphine concentrations.     

The bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of morphine after intravenous, oral and buccal administration in healthy volunteers.

1. The absolute bioavailability of morphine from oral aqueous solution, a controlled release oral tablet (MST-Continus) and a controlled release buccal tablet has been investigated in six healthy volunteers. 2. Analysis of plasma samples for morphine and its active metabolite morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) was by means of a differential radioimmunoassay technique. Absolute bioavailability for morphine was estimated to be 23.9% after oral solution, 22.4% after MST-Continus and 18.7% after the buccal tablet. Maximum plasma morphine concentrations were seen at 45 min (oral solution), 2.5 h (MST) and 6 h (buccal). 3. There was no difference in the amount of M6G appearing in plasma after intravenous, oral or buccal administration but the mean ratio of AUCs for M6G: morphine in plasma after intravenous morphine was 2 : 1 compared with 11 : 1 after oral and buccal morphine.     

Morphine and morphine-glucuronide concentrations in plasma and CSF during long-term administration of oral morphine.

Concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) were measured by h.p.l.c. in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from 16 patients with cancer receiving oral (controlled-release) morphine. There was a close correlation between plasma and CSF morphine concentrations (r = 0.94, P = 0.0001) and both correlated with drug dosage (r = 0.61, P = 0.013 and r = 0.74, P = 0.0001, respectively). M3G and M6G in plasma and CSF were correlated (r = 0.81 and r = 0.82, both P = 0.0001). No relationship was apparent between M plus M6G concentrations in the CSF and pain scores.     

Interindividual variation in the ratio between plasma morphine and its metabolites in cancer patients

In 25 cancer patients treated with slow-release oral morphine and in 10 cancer patients treated with continuous infusion of morphine, plasma steady-state concentrations of morphine (M), morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Blood samples were withdrawn at 0, 2 and 6 h after oral administration in patients treated with slow-release oral morphine and once or twice a day in patients treated with continuous infusion of morphine. In four cancer patients treated with continuous infusion of morphine, in order to analyze chronopharmacokinetic variability, the M-3-G/M ratio was observed at 12:00 h and 24:00 h. No significant changes were observed in M-3-G/M ratios and M-6-G ratios at 0, 2, and 6 h after oral administration of morphine. The M-3-G/M ratio (38.6 +/- 25.7) in the oral morphine group was significantly higher than that (15.3 +/- 12.9) in the continuous infusion group (p < 0.01). There was an approximately 10-fold interindividual variation in the M-3-G/M ratio both in the continuous infusion group and in the oral morphine group. These results suggest that the activity of UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 in the intestinal metabolism of morphine may play an active part in a large interindividual variation in the ratio of metabolites to morphine. Further studies are needed to clarify this hypothesis.     

Plasma levels of morphine and morphine glucuronides in the treatment of cancer pain: relationship to renal function and route of administration

Summary There is growing evidence that renally-impaired patients receiving morphine therapy are at greater risk of developing opiate toxicity, due to the accumulation of an active metabolite, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), which is usually excreted by the kidneys. This study examined the relationships between morphine dosage, renal function, and trough plasma concentrations of morphine and its glucuronide metabolites in 21 patients (aged mean: 68.5 years; 11 males) receiving either oral or subcutaneous morphine for terminal cancer pain. The median daily morphine dosages (mg · kg^–1) were: orally 1.87 (range 0.37–6.82) and subcutaneously 1.64 (range 0.22–3.60).The median plasma concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), and M6G (ng · ml^–1) were: 36.0, 1035.2, and 142.3, respectively. The plasma concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G were each significantly related to the daily morphine dosage (n=21, Spearman r=0.79, 0.91, and 0.88 respectively). Accumulation of the morphine glucuronides was dependent on renal function. The plasma concentrations of M3G and M6G, when divided by the morphine concentration, were significantly related to the caluclated creatinine clearance of the patient. Patients receiving oral morphine had higher plasma concentration ratios of glucuronide/morphine than those receiving subcutaneous therapy, presumably due to first-pass glucuronidation.The results of this study confirm that accumulation of the pharmacologically active M6G is related to renal function, which probably explains the observation that morphine dosage requirements are generally reduced in patients with renal impairment.     

High-dose morphine and methadone in cancer patients. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations of oral treatment

Several clinical studies have shown oral morphine and methadone to be effective in the treatment of intractable pain in patients with malignant disease. Recent pharmacokinetic studies have confirmed the rationale for regular administration of oral morphine and methadone but have revealed marked interindividual differences in the kinetics and metabolism which must be considered when titrating the oral dose according to the individual patient's need. Oral absorption of morphine in patients with malignant diseases is rapid, with peak plasma concentrations occurring at 20 to 90 minutes. Predose steady-state concentrations bear a constant relationship to dose, but vary considerably between individuals. The oral bioavailability is approximately 40% with marked patient-to-patient variations as a result of differences in presystemic elimination. The reported values for the volume of distribution range from 1.0 to 4.7 L/kg. Plasma protein binding is about 30%. The elimination half-life varies between 0.7 and 7.8 hours. Plasma clearance is approximately 19 ml/min/kg (5 to 34 ml/min/kg) and mostly accounted for by metabolic clearance. Studies in a few patients with malignant diseases treated regularly with daily doses of oral morphine ranging from 20 to 750mg indicate a linear relationship between the dose and trough concentration of morphine. Long term treatment with 10- to 20-fold increase of the oral dose over a period of 6 to 8 months does not seem to change the kinetics of oral morphine. The plasma concentrations of the main metabolite, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), exceed those of the parent drug by approximately 10-fold after intravenous administration and by 20-fold after oral administration. The relationship between the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of morphine and the AUC of morphine-3-glucuronide remains constant during the development of tolerance upon long term treatment with increasing doses. Renal disease causes a significant increase in the mean plasma concentrations of morphine for 15 minutes after its administration, while mean values of terminal half-life and total body clearance are within the normal range. However, the glucuronidated polar metabolite morphine-3-glucuronide rises rapidly to high concentrations which persist for several days. Chronic liver disease causes an increase in the bioavailability of oral morphine but no, or only a slight reduction in the intravenous clearance. The elimination half-life and volume of distribution are within the normal range.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Plasma concentrations following single doses of morphine sulfate in oral solution and rectal suppository

Plasma concentrations of morphine and morphine-3-glucuronide (morphine's major metabolite) were determined following single 10-mg doses of morphine sulfate in oral solution and rectal suppository. Ten patients with pain secondary to cancer were given a single 10-mg dose of oral morphine sulfate in an oral solution or rectal suppository on sequential days. Blood samples were collected at time zero and periodically for 4.5 hours after administration. Plasma concentrations of morphine and morphine-3-glucuronide were determined using liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Higher mean concentrations of morphine were achieved with the rectal suppository than with the oral solution at all time points, and the overall mean plasma morphine concentration for the entire 4.5-hour period was significantly higher for the rectal suppository than for the oral solution. There were no significant differences between dosage forms in mean morphine-3-glucuronide concentrations at individual time points or over the entire period. A single dose of morphine sulfate in a rectal suppository was better absorbed than in an oral solution. Further studies are needed to compare the clinical efficacy of these dosage forms under steady-state conditions.     

Neuroexcitatory effects of morphine and hydromorphone: evidence implicating the 3-glucuronide metabolites

1. Morphine is recommended by the World Health Organization as the drug of choice for the management of moderate to severe cancer pain. 2. Education of health professionals in the past decade has resulted in a large increase in the prescribing of opioids, such as morphine, and in the magnitude of the doses administered, resulting in an improvement in the quality of pain relief available for many cancer patients. 3. However, the reported incidence of neuroexcitatory side effects (allodynia, myoclonus, seizures) in patients administered large doses of systemic morphine or its structural analogue, hydromorphone (HMOR), has also increased. 4. Clinically, increasing the magnitude of the morphine or HMOR dose administered to patients already exhibiting neuroexcitatory opioid related side effects, results in an exacerbation rather than an attenuation of the excitatory behaviours. 5. In contrast, cessation of the opioid or rotation to a structurally dissimilar opioid (e.g. from morphine/HMOR to methadone or fentanyl), usually results in a restoration of analgesia and resolution of the neuroexcitatory opioid side effects over a period of hours to days. 6. To explain the clinical success of 'opioid rotation', it is essential to understand the in vivo metabolic fate of morphine and HMOR. 7. Following systemic administration, morphine and HMOR are metabolized primarily to the corresponding 3-glucuronide metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and hydromorphone-3-glucuronide (H3G), which are not only devoid of analgesic activity but evoke a range of dose-dependent excitatory behaviours, including allodynia, myoclonus and seizures, following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration to rats. 8. Several studies have shown that, following chronic oral or subcutaneous morphine administration to patients with cancer pain, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of M3G exceed those of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (analgesically active morphine metabolite) by approximately two- and five-fold, respectively. 9. These findings suggest that when the M3G concentration (or H3G by analogy) in the CSF exceeds the neuroexcitatory threshold, excitatory behaviours will be evoked in patients. 10. Thus, rotation of the opioid from morphine/HMOR to a structurally dissimilar opioid, such as methadone or fentanyl, will allow clearance of M3G/H3G from the patient central nervous system over hours to days, thereby producing a time-dependent resolution of the neuroexcitatory behaviours while maintaining analgesia with methadone or fentanyl.     

Pharmacokinetic differences of morphine and morphine-glucuronides are reflected in locomotor activity

The main metabolites of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), have been considered to participate in some of the effects of morphine. There is limited knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and dynamics of morphine and the main metabolites in mice, but mice are widely used to study both the analgesic effects and the psychomotor effects of morphine. The present study aimed to explore pharmacokinetic differences between morphine and morphine-glucuronides in mice after different routes of administration, and to investigate how possible differences were reflected in locomotor activity, a measure of psychostimulant properties. Mice were given morphine, M3G or M6G by different routes of administration. Serum concentrations versus time curves, pharmacokinetic parameters and locomotor activity were determined. Intraperitoneal administration of morphine reduced the bioavailability compared to intravenous and subcutaneous administration, but not so for morphine-glucuronides. The two morphine-glucuronides had similar pharmacokinetics, but morphine demonstrated higher volume of distribution and clearance than morphine-glucuronides. The present results demonstrated no locomotor effect of M3G, but a serum concentration effect relationship for morphine and M6G. When serum concentrations and effect changes were followed over time, there was some right hand shifts with respect to locomotor activity, especially during the declining phase of the concentration curve and particularly for M6G.     

Relationship between plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites and pain in cancer patients

Objective This study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between the plasma concentration of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide and pain in cancer patients receiving oral morphine. Methods The trough value of plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites were measured by high performance liquid chromatography using an ultraviolet detector. Using this assay system, the plasma concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide in 26 cancer pain patients were measured and compared with pain intensity. The pain intensity was assessed at the time of blood sampling using the visual analog scale. Results The trough value of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide did not show a significant correlation with pain intensity by visual analog scale assessment, but morphine-3-glucuronide and the ratio of morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine showed a significantly positive correlation (r = 0.528, P = 0.006 and r = 0.671, P < 0.001, respectively). By dividing the group according to low (≤ median value) or high (> median value) VAS scores a significant difference was found between the two groups in morphine-3-glucuronide and the ratio of morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine (P = 0.045 and P = 0.007, respectively). Conclusion These results indicated that the level of morphine-3-glucuronide is related to the patient’s perception of morphine effect, and the plasma concentration of morphine-3-glucuronide and the ratio of morphine-3-glucuronide/morphine indicated potency to assess clinical effect.     

Morphine hydrochloride suppositories. II. Bioavailability of morphine hydrochloride suppositories in dogs

Bioavailabilities of morphine after rectal administration of three different morphine.HCl suppositories were evaluated in dogs, whose rectum was lavaged or non-lavaged. The suppositories were prepared with three fatty bases (Witepsol H-15, Witepsol W-35, Suppocire AT) by the fusion method. The release of morphine from the suppositories was examined after stored for two weeks at 30 degrees C. The plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. The bioavailabilities of morphine after rectal administration were compared with those after intravenous and oral administration of morphine++.HCl solution. In the case of rectal lavaged dogs, the plasma levels of morphine after rectal administration of morphine.HCl solution were higher than those after oral administration of morphine.HCl solution. The release of morphine from Witepsol H-15 suppository was more rapid than those from other suppositories. Morphine after rectal administration of Witepsol H-15 suppository was rapidly absorbed in the rectum, and the inter-animal variation of its plasma levels was smaller than those of other suppositories. In rectal non-lavaged dogs, the bioavailabilities of morphine after rectal administration of morphine.HCl solution and suppositories decreased more than those of rectal lavaged dogs. Although the bioavailability of morphine after rectal administration of morphine.HCl was decreased by the influence of contents in the rectum, morphine from Witepsol H-15 suppository was more rapidly absorbed in the rectum, and the inter-animal variation of its plasma levels was smaller. These results indicate that, among their suppositories, Witepsol H-15 suppository is available for the terminal care of malignant disease.     

Oral morphine in cancer patients: in vivo kinetics and in vitro hepatic glucuronidation.

The kinetics of morphine and formation of the main metabolite, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) after single and intravenous doses of morphine were studied in six cancer patients and compared with the formation rate of M3G in vitro in microsomes isolated from liver biopsies obtained from the same patients at palliative laparotomy. The results showed that high formation rates of M3G in vitro in microsomes isolated from liver biopsies were associated both with high apparent oral clearance values and high M3G/morphine AUC (area under the concentration vs time curve) ratios as measured in vivo in the same patients. In accordance with previous results marked interindividual differences were seen in the kinetics of morphine; the oral bioavailability varied between 30 and 69% and the systemic plasma clearance between 18.6 and 34.0 ml min-1 kg-1. This variation correlated with the variation in morphine metabolism as assessed in vitro. In vivo, a high M3G/morphine AUC ratio predicted a high oral clearance. Hepatic UDP-glucuronyl transferase activity is thus an important determinant of the in vivo kinetics of orally administered morphine.     

Clinical efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of a newly developed controlled release morphine sulphate suppository in patients with cancer pain

Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of a newly developed controlled- release suppository (MSR) with MS Contin tablets (MSC) in cancer patients with pain. Methods: In a double-blind, randomised, two-way cross-over trial, 25 patients with cancer pain were selected with a morphine (M) demand of 30 mg every 12 h. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 received active MSC (30 mg) and placebo MSR, followed by placebo MSC and active MSR (30 mg) each for a period of 5 days. Group 2 started with active MSR and placebo MSC, followed by active MSC and placebo MSR, each for a period of 5 days. Blood for determination of plasma concentration of morphine (M) and its 3- and 6-glucuronides (M3G, M6G) was collected, and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC)_0–12 h, peak plasma concentration (C_max), time to reach C_max (t_max), and C0 and C12 of M, M6G and M3G were determined on day 5 and day 10. Intensity of pain experienced by each patient was assessed every 2 h on a 0–10 scale, while side effects and rescue medication were recorded. Results: Twenty patients (ten patients in each group) completed the study. A pronounced inter-patient variability in plasma concentrations of M, M3G and M6G was observed after administration of both forms. Apart from the C0 and C12, no significant differences in AUC_0–12 h, t_max and C_max of morphine between the rectal and oral route of administration were found. In the case of the metabolites, it was found that AUC_0–12 h and C_max of M6G, and AUC_0–12 h, C_max, C0 and C12 of M3G after rectal administration were significantly lower than after oral administration. However, apart from the t_max of M6G, none of the pharmacokinetic parameters of M, M6G or M3G met the criteria for bioequivalence. There were no significant (P=0.44) differences in pain intensity score between the oral and rectal forms within the two groups, regardless of the treatment sequence. No treatment differences in nausea, sedation or the demand on escape medication (acetaminophen tablets) between the rectal and oral forms were observed. Conclusion: The newly developed controlled-release M suppository is safe and effective and may be a useful alternative for oral morphine administration in patients with cancer pain. Received: 3 September 1999 / Accepted: 15 March 2000     

Pharmacokinetics of morphine are not altered in subjects with Gilbert's syndrome

AIMS: To verify that Gilbert's syndrome, which is caused by decreased glucuronidation capacity of the UDP-glucuronosyl transferase (UGT)1A1, does not account for impaired morphine clearance. METHODS: Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters for morphine and its glucuronide metabolites were compared between five carriers of Gilbert's syndrome and six noncarriers after a 7.5 mg (19.8 micro mol) intravenous injection of morphine sulphate pentahydrate. To estimate the amount of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) formed from morphine, 1 mg of deuterized M6G was injected intravenously at the same time. RESULTS: No differences were detected between carriers and noncarriers of Gilbert's syndrome in the clearance of morphine (80.1 +/- 12 l h(-1) vs 87.9 +/- 22 l h(-1)) and in the percentage of morphine that was metabolized to M6G (10.9 +/- 1.4 vs 13 +/- 2). The areas under the plasma concentration vs time curves of morphine, M6G and morphine-3-glucuronide also did not differ between carriers and noncarriers of Gilbert's syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Gilbert's syndrome is not a factor to be considered when prescribing morphine.     

LC determination of morphine and morphine glucuronides in human plasma by coulometric and UV detection

A reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method with coulometric and UV detection has been developed for the simultaneous determination of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide. The separation was carried out by using a Supelcosil LC-8 DB reversed-phase column and 0.1 M potassium dihydrogen phosphate (pH 2.5)--acetonitrile--methanol (94:5:1 v/v) containing 4 mM pentanesulfonic acid as the mobile phase. The compounds were determined simultaneously by coulometry for morphine and with UV detection for morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide. Morphine, morphine glucuronides and the internal standard were extracted from human plasma using Bond-Elut C18 (1 ml) solid-phase extraction cartridges. In the case of coulometric detection, the detection limit was 0.5 ng/ml for morphine; in the case of UV detection the detection limit was 10 ng/ml for morphine-3-glucuronide and for morphine-6-glucuronide, too.     

Start of oral morphine to cancer patients: effective serum morphine concentrations and contribution from morphine-6-glucuronide to the analgesia produced by morphine

Objective: To investigate the serum concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and the relationships between serum concentrations and clinical effects associated with start of morphine treatment in cancer patients. Methods: Forty patients with malignant disease and intolerable pain on weak opioids (codeine/dextropropoxyphen) were included. After a wash-out period, titration with immediate-release (IR) morphine was started. When a stable dose was achieved, the morphine treatment was changed to slow-release (SR) morphine in equivalent daily dosages. Clinical data and serum concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G were obtained at the end of the IR and SR morphine treatment periods. Results: The mean trough serum morphine concentration associated with pain relief was 66 nmol/l. The corresponding mean concentrations of M6G and M3G were 257 nmol/l and 1943 nmol/l, respectively. Morphine serum trough concentrations showed a 33-fold variation. Seventy percent of the variation was predicted in a model including age, daily morphine dose and M6G/morphine ratio as independent variables. No associations were observed between side effects and serum concentrations of morphine and its metabolites. Conclusion: In this study, a mean serum trough morphine concentration of 66 nmol/l was associated with satisfactory pain relief when disease progression required an increase in intensity of pain therapy from step II to step III in the World Health Organization pain ladder. An increased ratio of M6G to morphine serum concentrations predicted lower effective serum morphine concentrations at the time of satisfactory pain relief. This observation supports that M6G contributes to the pain control produced by oral morphine in patients with pain caused by malignant disease. Received: 23 June 1999 / Accepted in revised form: 18 August 1999     

No significant influence of OCT1 genotypes on the pharmacokinetics of morphine in adult surgical patients

We investigated the impact of genetic variants in OCT1 (SLC22A1) on morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) pharmacokinetics in adult patients scheduled for major surgery. Blood samples were taken before and 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min after a bolus of morphine (0.15 mg/kg). Patients were genotyped for the genetic variants (rs12208357, rs34059508, rs72552763 and rs34130495) in OCT1. Eighty-six patients completed the trial. The mean difference (95% confidence interval) for dose adjusted morphine, M3G and M6G AUC was 0.9 (?0.7–2.4), ?5.9 (?11.8 to ?0.03) and ?1.1 (?2.5–0.4) h/L*10^?6, respectively, in patients with two reduced function alleles compared to patients with no reduced function alleles in OCT1. Accordingly, the (AUC_M3G/Dose)/(AUC_{morphine/Dose}) and (AUC_M6G/Dose)/(AUC_{morphine/Dose}) ratio was reduced, ?1.8 (?3.2 to ?0.4) and ?0.4 (?0.7 to ?0.03), respectively, when comparing the same groups. OCT1 variants had no influence on the experience of pain, adverse events or the number of PCA doses used. In conclusion, genetic variants in OCT1 had a small and clinically unimportant impact on the exposure of morphine after intravenous administration. Our results do not support pre-emptive genotyping for OCT1 prior to morphine administration in patients scheduled for major surgery.