Évaluation quantitative des troubles sensitifs et des douleurs neuropathiques

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) may be defined as the analysis of perception of pain in response to thermal and mechanical stimuli of measured intensity. This method uses thermal, mechanical and vibratory stimuli, enabling the measurement of pain thresholds and sensations caused by suprathreshold stimulation. QST can quantify hypoesthesia (raised detection thresholds), allodynia (lowered pain thresholds) and hyperalgesia (increased response to suprathreshold stimuli). It is suitable for detecting or monitoring peripheral polyneuropathies characterized by fine fiber impairment, particularly diabetic peripheral neuropathies. It has also been used to analyse the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in certain neuropathic pain conditions and to assess the effects of treatments for neuropathic pain. In this paper the relevance and limitations of QST for the assessment of neuropathic pain and its treatment are discussed.     

Effects of single and repeated applications of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA) cream on spontaneous and evoked pain in post-herpetic neuralgia.

The analgesic effects of single and repeated applications of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA) cream on both spontaneous and evoked pains were evaluated in 11 patients with post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN). Detection thresholds, pain thresholds and the responses to suprathreshold mechanical and thermal stimuli were quantitatively determined at baseline, 30 min after the first application and after a series of daily applications over six consecutive days (duration of application: 5 h/day). In the acute situation, EMLA produced an overall anaesthetic effect without significantly reducing spontaneous ongoing pain and mechanical allodynia. Repeated applications significantly reduced paroxysmal pain and both the dynamic and static subtypes of mechanical hyperalgesia. The effects on spontaneous ongoing pain were more variable. They were inversely correlated to the magnitude of the thermal deficit at baseline, and were significant only in patients with dynamic mechano-allodynia. Pathophysiological implications of these results are discussed.     

Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials.

We have compiled a comprehensive QST protocol as part of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) using well established tests for nearly all aspects of somatosensation. This protocol encompasses thermal as well as mechanical testing procedures. Our rationale was to test for patterns of sensory loss (small and large nerve fiber functions) or gain (hyperalgesia, allodynia, hyperpathia), and to assess both cutaneous and deep pain sensitivity. The practicality of the QST protocol was tested in 18 healthy subjects, 21-58 years, half of them female. All subjects were tested bilaterally over face, hand and foot. We determined thermal detection and pain thresholds including a test for the presence of paradoxical heat sensations, mechanical detection thresholds to von Frey filaments and a 64-Hz tuning fork, mechanical pain thresholds to pinprick stimuli and blunt pressure, stimulus-response-functions for pinprick and dynamic mechanical allodynia (pain to light touch), and pain summation (wind-up ratio) using repetitive pinprick stimulation. The full protocol took 27+/-2.3 min per test area. The majority of QST parameters were normally distributed only after logarithmic transformation (secondary normalization) except for the frequency of paradoxical heat sensations, cold and heat pain thresholds, and for vibration detection thresholds. Thresholds were usually lowest over face, followed by hand, and then foot. Only thermal pain thresholds, wind-up ratio and vibration detection thresholds were not significantly dependent on the body region. There was no significant right-to-left difference for any of the QST parameters; left-to-right correlation coefficients ranged between 0.78 and 0.97, thus explaining between 61% and 94% of the variance. This study has shown that a complete somatosensory profile of one affected area and one unaffected control area, which will be necessary to characterize patients with a variety of diseases, can be obtained within 1 h. Case examples of selected patients illustrate the value of z-transformed QST data for an easy survey of individual symptom profiles.     

Value of quantitative sensory testing in neurological and pain disorders: NeuPSIG consensus

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a psychophysical method used to quantify somatosensory function in response to controlled stimuli in healthy subjects and patients. Although QST shares similarities with the quantitative assessment of hearing or vision, which is extensively used in clinical practice and research, it has not gained a large acceptance among clinicians for many reasons, and in significant part because of the lack of information about standards for performing QST, its potential utility, and interpretation of results. A consensus meeting was convened by the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain (NeuPSIG) to formulate recommendations for conducting QST in clinical practice and research. Research studies have confirmed the utility of QST for the assessment and monitoring of somatosensory deficits, particularly in diabetic and small fiber neuropathies; the assessment of evoked pains (mechanical and thermal allodynia or hyperalgesia); and the diagnosis of sensory neuropathies. Promising applications include the assessment of evoked pains in large-scale clinical trials and the study of conditioned pain modulation. In clinical practice, we recommend the use QST for screening for small and large fiber neuropathies; monitoring of somatosensory deficits; and monitoring of evoked pains, allodynia, and hyperalgesia. QST is not recommended as a stand-alone test for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain. For the conduct of QST in healthy subjects and in patients, we recommend use of predefined standardized stimuli and instructions, validated algorithms of testing, and reference values corrected for anatomical site, age, and gender. Interpretation of results should always take into account the clinical context, and patients with language and cognitive difficulties, anxiety, or litigation should not be considered eligible for QST. When appropriate standards, as discussed here, are applied, QST can provide important and unique information about the functional status of somatosensory system, which would be complementary to already existing clinical methods.     

Modality-specific sensory changes in humans after the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) in cutaneous nociceptive pathways

The impact of long-term potentiation (LTP) in nociceptive pathways on somatosensory perception was examined by means of quantitative sensory testing (QST) in the ventral forearm of 12 healthy human subjects. Electrical high-frequency stimulation of the forearm skin (HFS; 5 x 1 s at 100 Hz and 10 x detection threshold) led to an abrupt increase of pain to single electrical test stimuli, which were applied through the same electrode (perceptual LTP +72%, p<0.01). Perceptual LTP outlasted the 1-h observation period. The effects of HFS on somatosensory perception of natural test stimuli in the conditioned skin area were restricted to mechanical submodalities. Subjects exhibited a significant decrease of pain threshold and an increase of pain ratings to suprathreshold pinprick stimuli (p<0.01). In 5 out of 12 subjects (42%) light tactile stimuli led to painful sensations (dynamic mechanical allodynia). Furthermore, a small but significant decrease of threshold to blunt pressure stimuli (p<0.05) was found. In contrast, all thermal modalities comprising cold and warm detection thresholds, cold and heat pain thresholds as well as pain summation (perceptual wind up) remained unaltered. These data show that HFS of peptidergic cutaneous C-fiber afferents predominantly modulates Adelta- and Abeta-fiber mediated somatosensory functions, suggesting that LTP in nociceptive pathways enhances human pain sensitivity via interaction of two afferent pathways (extrinsic sensitization).     

Vulvar vestibulitis severity--assessment by sensory and pain testing modalities

Vulvar vestibulitis syndrome (VVS) is a common cause of dyspareunia in pre-menopausal women. Previous quantitative sensory test (QST) studies have demonstrated reduced vestibular pain thresholds in these patients. Here we try to find whether QST findings correlate to disease severity. Thirty-five vestibulitis patients, 17 with moderate and 18 with severe disorder, were compared to 22 age matched control women. Tactile and pain thresholds for mechanical pressure and thermal pain were measured at the posterior fourcette. Magnitude estimation of supra-threshold painful stimuli were obtained for mechanical and thermal stimuli, the latter were of tonic and phasic types. Pain thresholds were lower and supra-threshold magnitude estimations were higher in VVS patients, in agreement with disease severity. Cut-off points were defined for results of each test, discriminating between moderate VVS, severe VVS and healthy controls, and allowing calculation of sensitivity and specificity of the various tests. Our findings show that the best discriminative test was mechanical pain threshold obtained by a simple custom made 'spring pressure device'. This test had the highest kappa value (0.82), predicting correctly 88% of all VVS cases and 100% of the severe VVS cases. Supra-threshold pain magnitude estimation for tonic heat stimulation also had a high kappa value (0.73) predicting correctly 82% overall with a 100% correct diagnosis of the control group. QST techniques, both threshold and supra-threshold measurements, seem to be capable of discriminating level of severity of this clinical pain syndrome.     

Cutaneous sensory abnormalities in children and adolescents with complex regional pain syndromes

Complex regional pain syndromes (CRPS) have been recognized with increasing frequency in children. These disorders appear to differ markedly from those observed in adults. The International Association for the Study of Pain diagnostic criteria for CRPS were developed based on adult studies; these criteria have not been validated for children. We performed standardized neurological examination and quantitative sensory testing (QST) in a group of pediatric patients to characterize features of sensory dysfunction. Forty-two patients, with unilateral lower extremity CRPS of a mean duration of the pain and symptoms of 12.6 months, who met IASP adult-based criteria for CRPS underwent standardized neurological examination and QST. QST parameters were compared to values previously derived from age- and sex-matched pediatric healthy controls. In most respects, QST parameters did not differ significantly between patients and the normal reference values except for cold and heat pain detection thresholds. Allodynia to cold and/or heat (P<0.001) occurred in 21 patients. Cold allodynia was the most common QST abnormality in our patients. Twenty-six patients showed a combination of mechanical dynamic and static allodynia and allodynia to punctate temporal summation. There was a significant correlation between mechanical dynamic allodynia and allodynia to punctate temporal summation (P<0.001). As with adult CRPS, the thermal and mechanical sensory abnormalities appear in different combinations in different patients with similar clinical presentations. In a majority of patients, the pathogenesis of pain is seemingly of central origin.     

Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values

The nationwide multicenter trials of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) aim to characterize the somatosensory phenotype of patients with neuropathic pain. For this purpose, we have implemented a standardized quantitative sensory testing (QST) protocol giving a complete profile for one region within 30 min. To judge plus or minus signs in patients we have now established age- and gender-matched absolute and relative QST reference values from 180 healthy subjects, assessed bilaterally over face, hand and foot. We determined thermal detection and pain thresholds including a test for paradoxical heat sensations, mechanical detection thresholds to von Frey filaments and a 64 Hz tuning fork, mechanical pain thresholds to pinprick stimuli and blunt pressure, stimulus/response-functions for pinprick and dynamic mechanical allodynia, and pain summation (wind-up ratio). QST parameters were region specific and age dependent. Pain thresholds were significantly lower in women than men. Detection thresholds were generally independent of gender. Reference data were normalized to the specific group means and variances (region, age, gender) by calculating z-scores. Due to confidence limits close to the respective limits of the possible data range, heat hypoalgesia, cold hypoalgesia, and mechanical hyperesthesia can hardly be diagnosed. Nevertheless, these parameters can be used for group comparisons. Sensitivity is enhanced by side-to-side comparisons by a factor ranging from 1.1 to 2.5. Relative comparisons across body regions do not offer advantages over absolute reference values. Application of this standardized QST protocol in patients and human surrogate models will allow to infer underlying mechanisms from somatosensory phenotypes.     

Test order of quantitative sensory testing facilitates mechanical hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) has become a widely used method to evaluate different submodalities of the somatic sensory system (predominantly) in patients with neuropathic pain. QST consists of 7 tests measuring 13 parameters in order to assess and quantify the perception of temperature, touch, pain, pressure, and vibration. The German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain implemented a standardized QST protocol including a defined testing order of the measurements. Accordingly, subjects tested with QST undergo thermal before mechanical testing. In the present study, we investigated the effect of testing order on the results of QST. Twenty healthy subjects were tested twice, 1 week apart with 2 different QST testing orders: the standardized testing order according to the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain and a modified testing order in which mechanical stimuli were applied before thermal stimuli. For the test protocol that began with thermal testing, subjects exhibited signs of an increased mechanical perception: The mechanical pain sensitivity was significantly increased (P = .001, Wilcoxon test) for each pinprick stimulator and the mechanical pain threshold was lowered by a factor of 2 when compared with the modified testing order in which mechanical parameters were tested at the beginning of the session without prior thermal stimulation. Thermal parameters were the same for both test-order paradigms. These data indicate that preceding mild thermal stimulation might lead to a sensitization to mechanical stimuli and thus to mechanical hyperalgesia. Alternative habituation mechanisms in the modified testing order resulting from repeated pinprick stimulation at the beginning should also be debated. QST is a helpful diagnostic tool but interpretation should be done with consideration of interaction between test parameters. Reference data are only valid in the testing order from which they are obtained. PERSPECTIVE: Present data showed that mechanical hyperalgesia followed thermal testing. This article demonstrates that the test order of quantitative sensory testing is relevant in interpreting the results obtained. Reference values are suitable in the test order from which they are obtained.     

Heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation (HNCS) reduced the intensity of spontaneous pain, but not of allodynia in painful peripheral neuropathy.

In 15 patients with painful peripheral neuropathy and dynamic mechanical allodynia, the influence of spontaneous ongoing neuropathic pain on pain sensitivity in a remote pain-free area was examined, as was the influence of ischemia-induced heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation (HNCS) on the intensity of ongoing pain and brush-evoked allodynia. In addition, the modulating effect of HNCS on pain sensitivity in a pain-free area was investigated. Pain thresholds to pressure and heat as well as the sensitivity to suprathreshold pressure- and heat pain were assessed in the pain-free area. Dynamic mechanical allodynia was induced by a recently developed semi-quantitative brushing technique and the patients continuously rated the intensity of the allodynia using a computerized visual analogue scale (VAS). The total brush-evoked pain intensity was calculated as the area under the VAS curve. At baseline, no significant difference in pain sensitivity was found between patients and their healthy controls in the pain-free area, indicating a lack of activation of pain modulatory systems from the spontaneous pain. Compared to baseline, the patients rated the ongoing neuropathic pain intensity significantly lower during the HNCS-procedure (p<0.05). In contrast, there was no influence from HNCS on the total brush-evoked pain intensity. In the pain-free area higher pressure pain thresholds were demonstrated during conditioning stimulation in patients and controls alike (p<0.01). In controls only, a significantly higher heat pain threshold was found during the HNCS-procedure (p<0.01). The main finding of the present study was that HNCS altered differentially spontaneous and brush-provoked pain in patients with painful peripheral neuropathy.     

A novel behavioral model of neuropathic pain disorders produced in rats by partial sciatic nerve injury

Partial nerve injury is the main cause of causalgiform pain disorders in humans. We present here a novel animal model of this condition. In rats we unilaterally ligated about half of the sciatic nerve high in the thigh. Within a few hours after the operation, and for several months thereafter, the rats developed guarding behavior of the ipsilateral hind paw and licked it often, suggesting the possibility of spontaneous pain. The plantar surface of the foot was evenly hyperesthetic to non-noxious and noxious stimuli. None of the rats autotomized. There was a sharp decrease in the withdrawal thresholds bilaterally in response to repetitive Von Frey hair stimulation at the plantar side. After a series of such stimuli in the operated side, light touch elicited aversive responses, suggesting allodynia to touch. The withdrawal thresholds to CO2 laser heat pulses were markedly lowered bilaterally. Suprathreshold noxious heat pulses elicited exaggerated responses unilaterally, suggesting thermal hyperalgesia. Pin-prick evoked such exaggerated responses bilaterally (mechanical hyperalgesia). In a companion report, we show that these abnormalities critically depend on the sympathetic outflow. Based on the immediate onset and long-lasting perpetuation of similar symptoms, such as touch-evoked allodynia and hyperalgesia, and the resemblance of the contralateral phenomena to 'mirror image' pains in some humans with causalgia, we suggest that this preparation may serve as a model for syndromes of the causalgiform variety that are triggered by partial nerve injury and maintained by sympathetic activity.     

Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Reference data for the trunk and application in patients with chronic postherpetic neuralgia

Age- and gender-matched reference values are essential for the clinical use of quantitative sensory testing (QST). To extend the standard test sites for QST—according to the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain—to the trunk, we collected QST profiles on the back in 162 healthy subjects. Sensory profiles for standard test sites were within normal interlaboratory differences. QST revealed lower sensitivity on the upper back than the hand, and higher sensitivity on the lower back than the foot, but no systematic differences between these trunk sites. Age effects were significant for most parameters. Females exhibited lower pressure pain thresholds (PPT) than males, which was the only significant gender difference. Values outside the 95% confidence interval of healthy subjects (considered abnormal) required temperature changes of >3.3–8.2 °C for thermal detection. For cold pain thresholds, confidence intervals extended mostly beyond safety cutoffs, hence only relative reference data (left-right differences, hand-trunk differences) were sufficiently sensitive. For mechanical detection and pain thresholds, left-right differences were 1.5–2.3 times more sensitive than absolute reference data. The most sensitive parameter was PPT, where already side-to-side differences >35% were abnormal. Compared to trunk reference data, patients with postherpetic neuralgia exhibited thermal and tactile deficits and dynamic mechanical allodynia, mostly without reduced mechanical pain thresholds. This pattern deviates from other types of neuropathic pain. QST reference data for the trunk will also be useful for patients with postthoracotomy pain or chronic back pain.     

Subthalamic deep brain stimulation modulates small fiber-dependent sensory thresholds in Parkinson's disease

The effects of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) rarely have been investigated. Among these, sensory disturbances, including chronic pain (CP), are frequent in these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes induced by deep brain stimulation in the perception of sensory stimuli, either noxious or innocuous, mediated by small or large nerve fibers. Sensory detection and pain thresholds were assessed in 25 PD patients all in the off-medication condition with the stimulator turned on or off (on- and off-stimulation conditions, respectively). The relationship between the changes induced by surgery on quantitative sensory testing, spontaneous CP, and motor abilities were studied. Quantitative sensory test results obtained in PD patients were compared with those of age-matched healthy subjects. Chronic pain was present in 72% of patients before vs 36% after surgery (P=.019). Compared with healthy subjects, PD patients had an increased sensitivity to innocuous thermal stimuli and mechanical pain, but a reduced sensitivity to innocuous mechanical stimuli. In addition, they had an increased pain rating when painful thermal stimuli were applied, particularly in the off-stimulation condition. In the on-stimulation condition, there was an increased sensitivity to innocuous thermal stimuli but a reduced sensitivity to mechanical or thermal pain. Pain provoked by thermal stimuli was reduced when the stimulator was turned on. Motor improvement positively correlated with changes in warm detection and heat pain thresholds. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation contributes to relieve pain associated with PD and specifically modulates small fiber-mediated sensations.     

Quantitative sensory testing before and after regional guanethidine block in patients with neuralgia in the hand.

Using reference values from healthy volunteers, thermal and vibration-induced pain thresholds and the sensibility for warm and cold were studied in 18 patients with neuralgia in one hand following a traumatic injury or surgery. All patients had spontaneous pain and allodynia to vibration. They were treated with intravenous regional guanethidine block (RGB). Quantitative sensory testing was performed on both hands before and 1-3 days after treatment. Eleven patients benefitted considerably from the block, with pain relief for 2 weeks or more. Ten of these 11 patients had mild nerve injuries caused by compressive trauma to the nerve. Before RGB they showed a moderate loss in temperature discrimination capacity; their heat pain thresholds were reduced and they exhibited allodynia to cold and vibration on the injured side. After RGB, the pain thresholds were normalised both to thermal and vibratory stimuli. These patients were classified as having sympathetically maintained pain (SMP). Seven patients reported no or only minor pain-relieving effect of RGB lasting 1-5 days. Severe nerve injuries were most frequent in this group of patients. On the injured side, before RGB, their ability to discriminate between warm and cold was markedly impaired, thermal pain thresholds were normal, and they showed allodynia to vibration. After RGB, there was no change in thermal pain thresholds and the allodynia to vibration persisted. These patients were classified as having sympathetically independent pain (SIP). The results indicate that quantitative thermal sensory tests, together with clinical evaluation of the nerve trauma, can help to predict which patients will have long-lasting pain alleviation after RGB treatment.     

Lumbar Sympathectomy Attenuates Cold Allodynia But Not Mechanical Allodynia and Hyperalgesia in Rats With Spared Nerve Injury

In certain patients with neuropathic pain, the pain is dependent on activity in the sympathetic nervous system. To investigate whether the spared nerve injury model (SNI) produced by injury to the tibial and common peroneal nerves and leaving the sural nerve intact is a model for sympathetically maintained pain, we measured the effects of surgical sympathectomy on the resulting mechanical allodynia, mechanical hyperalgesia, and cold allodynia. Decreases of paw withdrawal thresholds to von Frey filament stimuli and increases in duration of paw withdrawal to pinprick or acetone stimuli were observed in the ipsilateral paw after SNI, compared with their pre-SNI baselines. Compared with sham surgery, surgical lumbar sympathectomy had no effect on the mechanical allodynia and mechanical hyperalgesia induced by SNI. However, the sympathectomy significantly attenuated the cold allodynia induced by SNI. These results suggest that the allodynia and hyperalgesia to mechanical stimuli in the SNI model is not sympathetically maintained. However, the sympathetic nervous system may be involved, in part, in the mechanisms of cold allodynia in the SNI model. PERSPECTIVE: The results of our study suggest that the SNI model is not an appropriate model of sympathetically maintained mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia but may be useful to study the mechanisms of cold allodynia associated with sympathetically maintained pain states.     

Can widespread hypersensitivity in carpal tunnel syndrome be substantiated if neck and arm pain are absent?

Recent studies demonstrated that patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) have signs of thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia in extra‐median territories suggesting an involvement of central pain mechanisms. As previous studies included patients with shoulder/arm symptoms or neck pain, a potential influence of these coexisting disorders cannot be excluded. This study therefore evaluated whether widespread sensory changes (hypoesthesia or hyperalgesia) are present in patients with unilateral CTS in the absence of coexisting disorders. Twenty‐six patients with unilateral CTS with symptoms localised to their hand and 26 healthy controls participated in the study. A comprehensive quantitative sensory testing (QST) protocol including thermal and mechanical detection and pain thresholds was performed over the hands (median, ulnar and radial innervation area), lateral elbows, neck and tibialis anterior muscle. Patients with CTS demonstrated thermal and mechanical hypoesthesia in the hand but not at distant sites. Thermal or mechanical hyperalgesia was not identified at any location with traditional QST threshold testing. However, patients with CTS rated the pain during thermal pain testing significantly higher than healthy participants. This was especially apparent for heat pain ratings which were elevated not only in the affected hand but also in the neck and tibialis anterior muscle. In conclusion, CTS alone in the absence of coexisting neck and arm pain does not account for sensory changes outside the affected hand as determined by traditional QST threshold testing. Elevated pain ratings may however be an early indication of central pain mechanisms.     

Mechanical and heat hyperalgesia highly predict clinical pain intensity in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain syndromes

Multiple abnormalities in pain processing have been reported in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain syndromes. These changes include mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia, decreased thresholds to mechanical and thermal stimuli (allodynia), and central sensitization, all of which are fundamental to the generation of clinical pain. Therefore, we hypothesized that quantitative sensory tests may provide useful predictors of clinical pain intensity of such patients. Our previous studies of fibromyalgia (FM) patients have shown statistically significant correlations of quantitative sensory test results with clinical pain intensity, including mechanical spatial summation, number of pain areas, wind-up, and wind-up aftersensations. Although these tests predicted up to 59% of the variance in FM clinical pain intensity, their expense and technical complexities limited widespread use in clinical practice and trials. Thus, we developed practical tests of primary (mechanical) and secondary (heat) hyperalgesia that also strongly predict clinical pain intensity in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders. Thirty-six individuals with FM, 24 with local musculoskeletal pain, and 23 normal controls underwent testing of mechanical and heat hyperalgesia at the shoulders and hands. All subjects rated experimental pains using an electronic visual analog scale. Using either heat or pressure pain ratings as well as tender point counts and negative affect as predictors, up to 49.4% of the patients' variance of clinical pain intensity could be estimated. Results of this study emphasize the important contributions of peripheral and central factors to both local and widespread chronic pain. Overall, measures of mechanical and heat hyperalgesia in combination with tender point and negative affect provided powerful predictors of clinical pain intensity in chronic musculoskeletal pain patients that can be readily used in clinical practice and trials. PERSPECTIVE: Simple tests of mechanical and heat hyperalgesia can predict large proportions of the variance in clinical pain intensity of chronic musculoskeletal pain patients and thus are feasible to be included in clinical practice and clinical trials.     

Changes in sensory processing in the spinal dorsal horn accompany vincristine-induced hyperalgesia and allodynia

Abnormal sensation and pain are major dose-limiting factors in cancer chemotherapy with vincristine. In this study, we have adapted a model of this condition by using repeated daily intraperitoneal injections of vincristine in rats. Mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia without change in responses to thermal stimuli were first observed following 5-8 days of vincristine treatment (0.1mg/kg/day) and then persisted throughout the remainder of the treatment interval (2-3 weeks). Electrophysiological recording from wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons in the lumbar (L4-L5) spinal dorsal horn in hyperalgesic rats demonstrated significantly increased spontaneous activity and after-discharges to noxious mechanical stimuli (von Frey filaments with a bending force greater than 58.02mN, skin compression 1.3 and 3N, 1mm(2)), increased acute A- and C-fiber responses, after-discharges and abnormal 'wind-up' to electrical stimuli (5mA, 2ms) at 0.1Hz applied across the receptive field. These results suggest a state of central sensitization develops in spinal WDR neurons with repeated vincristine treatment that contributes to the spontaneous pain and hyperalgesia seen in patients and the hyperresponsiveness to sensory stimuli seen in animals treated with vincristine.     

Neurophysiologic and quantitative sensory testing in the diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathy and neuropathic pain

This study investigated the utility of neurophysiologic examination and thermal quantitative sensory testing (QST) in the diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathy and neuropathic pain. Fifty-eight patients (14 men), 34 with sensory deficit within the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and 24 within the lingual nerve (LN) distribution, were included. Twenty-six patients (45%) reported neuropathic pain. Patients underwent blink reflex (BR) test and thermal QST; sensory neurography was done to the IAN patients. Results of clinical sensory testing were available from the charts of 48 patients revealing abnormal findings in 77% of the IAN and in 94% of the LN patients. The BR test was abnormal in 41%, neurography in 96%, and QST in 91% of the IAN patients. In the LN group, BR was abnormal in 33%, and QST in 100% of the patients tested. Neurophysiologic tests and QST verified the subjective sensory alteration in all but 2 IAN patients, both with old injuries, and 4 LN patients who did not undergo QST. When abnormal, thermal QST showed elevation of warm and cold detection thresholds (hypo/anesthesia), hypoalgesia was less marked, and heat allodynia was only occasionally present. Contralateral thermal hypoesthesia after unilateral injury was found in 14 patients. It was associated with the occurrence of neuropathic pain (P=0.016). Axonal Abeta afferent damage was less severe in the IAN patients with pain than in those without pain (P=0.012). Neurophysiologic tests and thermal QST provide sensitive tools for accurate diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathy and study of pathophysiological features characteristic to human neuropathic pain.     

Cold allodynia and hyperalgesia in neuropathic pain: the effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine--a double-blind,cross-over comparison with alfentanil and placebo

Cold allodynia and hyperalgesia are frequent clinical findings in patients with neuropathic pain. While there have been several clinical studies showing the involvement of central sensitization mechanisms and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation in mechanical allodynia/hyperalgesia and ongoing pain, the mechanisms of thermal allodynia and hyperalgesia have received less attention. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of the NMDA-receptor antagonist ketamine on thermal allodynia/hyperalgesia, ongoing pain and mechanical allodynia/hyperalgesia in patients with neuropathic pain (11 patients with post-traumatic neuralgia and one patient with post-herpetic neuralgia). All the patients were known to suffer from severe cold allodynia (cold pain detection threshold (CPDT): 23.8 degrees C, median value). The mu-opioid agonist alfentanil was used as an active control. The study design was double-blind and placebo-controlled and the drugs were administered i.v. (bolus dose and infusion). CPDT in the asymptomatic contralateral area was found to be significantly decreased (cold allodynia) compared to CPDT in site- and age-matched normal controls. Heat pain detection thresholds were found to be normal and no consistent heat hyperalgesia occurred. Alfentanil significantly reduced cold allodynia (by increasing CPDT) in symptomatic area (P=0.0076). Ketamine did not significantly increase the threshold. Significant and marked reductions of hyperalgesia to cold (visual analogue score at threshold value) were seen following both alfentanil (4.5 before, 1.4 after, median value) and ketamine (6.8 before, 0.4 after, median value). Alfentanil and ketamine also significantly reduced ongoing pain and mechanical hyperalgesia. It is concluded that NMDA-receptor mediated central sensitization is involved in cold hyperalgesia, but since CPDT remained unaltered, it is likely that other mechanisms are present.