Response to preoperative chemoradiation increases the use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with locally advanced low rectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Although controversial, some believe that preoperative chemoradiation increases the use of sphincter-preserving surgery in low rectal carcinoma patients. This article investigates the relationship between objective tumor response and sphincter preservation in low rectal carcinoma patients. METHODS: The authors reviewed the records of 238 patients with T3 or T4 low rectal carcinoma (< or = 6 cm from the anal verge) who underwent preoperative pelvic chemoradiation (45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks, n = 182 or 52.5 Gy/30 fractions/5 weeks, n = 56 with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil at 300 mg/m(2), Monday to Friday) followed by mesorectal (n = 223) or local excision (n = 15). A logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influence of objective tumor response (defined as complete clinical response) and other prognostic factors on sphincter preservation. Because degrees of partial response could not be objectively defined retrospectively, the influence of partial response on sphincter preservation could not be evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 49% of patients (117 of 238) had sphincter-preserving surgery. The clinical complete response rate was 47%. Independent predictors of sphincter preservation included the year of surgery, tumor distance from the anal verge, circumferential tumor involvement, and response to chemoradiation. The sphincter preservation rate increased over the period of the study (from 28% [December 1989 to December 1992] to 44% [January 1993 to December 1996] to 67% [January 1997 to December 2000]). The difference in the rates of sphincter preservation according to response was most striking among patients with tumors 3 cm or less from the anal verge (44% vs. 22%, P = 0.01). The pelvic disease recurrence rate among patients undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery has been less than 10% since January 1993 and was not statistically different between the groups treated from January 1993 to December 1996 and from January 1997 to December 2000. CONCLUSIONS: There has been an increase in the use of sphincter-preserving surgery without an increase in pelvic disease recurrence over the past decade. Although not necessary for sphincter preservation, clinical response to preoperative chemoradiation independently contributed to sphincter-preserving surgery, particularly in patients with low rectal tumors.     

Ano-rectal sphincter preservation following preoperative chemoradiation in cT3–4Nx rectal cancer: influence of tumor distance and downstaging

To analyze the impact of preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer in the surgical management of the ano-rectal sphincter complex, unselected modern practice, in a university hospital context. From March 1995 to December 1999, 86 consecutive cT_3–4N_x patients (imaging staging systems employed included CT scan 94% and endorectal ultrasound 71%), had radical surgery following preoperative chemoradiation (conventional 45–50 Gy plus simultaneously administered 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] in continuous intravenous infusion or oral Tegafur). A total of 19 senior surgeons were involved in the procedures. Surgery was performed 4 to 6 weeks after chemoradiation. Additional treatment components included intraoperative presacral electron boost (10–15 Gy) and adjuvant chemotherapy (5-FU plus leucovorin). Total T downstaging rate was 53% (pT_0–1, 21%). No sphincter-preserving surgery was attempted in 14 patients who had the lower limit of their tumor in the 0–3 cm rectal segment (the incidence of pT_0–1 specimens in this subgroup was 35%). Anterior resection was performed in 17/36 (47%) of the patients with tumors in the 4 to 6 cm rectal segment (pT_0–1 22%) and, in all the cases, with tumors lying over 8 cm of the distance to the anal verge (pT_0–1 13%). With a median follow-up of 24 months, a total of 3 pelvic recurrences were detected (2 in sphincter-preserved patients: 1 of them in the anastomotic line). In an unselected academic surgical experience, sphincter-preserving surgery was elected in 72% of patients with an initial tumor distance to the anal verge ≥ 4 cm, while it was systematically avoided in the rectal segment below 3 cm, regardless of evident T downstaging remission. Innovative techniques should be considered to further increase ano-rectal sphincterian complex preservation, in the present context of efficient preoperative combined modality therapy.     

Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer

Opinion statement Distal rectal cancer poses two challenges to the oncologist: local tumor control and sphincter preservation. The abdominoperineal resection (APR), long considered the standard treatment of tumors with a distal edge located up to 6 cm from the anal verge, provides local control in many patients but results in sphincter loss with a permanent colostomy. This is a critical limitation. Consequently, there has been significant interest in sphincter-conserving approaches, frequently combining chemoradiation with surgery. These approaches have evolved along two fronts. For patients with small rectal cancers confined to the rectal wall, local excision techniques with and without chemoradiation may offer comparable local control and survival rates as an APR and preserve sphincter function. For patients with larger and more invasive tumors of the distal rectum where local excision is inappropriate, preoperative chemoradiation promotes tumor regression and may facilitate a resection sparing the sphincter with a coloanal anastomosis. Preliminary results from single institution studies appear promising. In both these settings (favorable and more invasive rectal cancer), chemoradiation is employed to compensate for the limitations of the sphincter-preserving surgical technique. In local excision procedures, the excision margins are invariably small, and the mesorectum (lymphatics, soft tissue) surrounding the tumor is not excised. For patients undergoing resection with coloanal anastomosis, there are narrow radial and distal surgical margins. With these approaches of chemoradiation and sphinctersparing surgery, satisfactory local control and survival with avoidance of colostomy are possible for many patients with distal rectal cancer.     

Preoperative chemoradiation using oral capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a new orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate that was rationally designed to exert its effect by tumor-selective activation. We attempted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of preoperative chemoradiation using capecitabine in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between July 1999 and March 2001, 45 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (cT3/T4 or N+) were treated with preoperative chemoradiation. Radiation of 45 Gy/25 fractions was delivered to the pelvis, followed by a 5.4 Gy/3 fractions boost to the primary tumor. Chemotherapy was administered concurrent with radiotherapy and consisted of 2 cycles of 14-day oral capecitabine (1650 mg/m(2)/day) and leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)/day), each of which was followed by a 7-day rest period. Surgery was performed 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients received definitive surgery. Primary tumor and node downstaging occurred in 63% and 90% of patients, respectively. The overall downstaging rate, including both primary tumor and nodes, was 84%. A pathologic complete response was achieved in 31% of patients. Twenty-one patients had tumors located initially 5 cm or less from the anal verge; among the 18 treated with surgery, 72% received sphincter-preserving surgery. No Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities developed. Other Grade 3 toxicities were as follows: hand-foot syndrome (7%), fatigue (4%), diarrhea (4%), and radiation dermatitis (2%). CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective neoadjuvant treatment modality for locally advanced rectal cancer. In addition, this preoperative treatment has a considerable downstaging effect on the tumor and can increase the possibility of sphincter preservation in distal rectal cancer.     

Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short-term radiotherapy vs. conventionally fractionated radiochemotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to verify whether preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation offers an advantage in sphincter preservation in comparison with preoperative short-term irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resectable T3-4 rectal carcinoma without sphincters' infiltration and with a lesion accessible to digital rectal examination were randomised into: preoperative 5x5Gy short-term irradiation with subsequent total mesorectal excision (TME) performed within 7 days or chemoradiation to a total dose of 50.4Gy (1.8Gy per fraction) concomitantly with two courses of bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin followed by TME after 4-6 weeks. Surgeons were obliged to base the type of operation on the tumour status at the time of surgery. RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2002, 316 patients from 19 institutions were enrolled. The sphincter preservation rate was 61% in the 5x5Gy arm and 58% in the radiochemotherapy arm, P = 0.57. The tumour was on average 1.9 cm smaller (P < 0.001) among patients treated with chemoradiation compared with short-term schedule. For patients who underwent sphincter-preserving procedure, the surgeons generally followed the rule of tailoring the resection according to tumour downsizing; the median distal bowel margin was identical (2 cm) for both randomised groups. However, in the chemoradiation group, five patients underwent abdominoperineal resection despite clinical complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant downsizing, chemoradiation did not result in increased sphincter preservation rate in comparison with short-term preoperative radiotherapy. The surgeons' decisions were subjective and based on pre-treatment tumour volume at least in clinical complete responders.     

Preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: rationale, technique, and results of treatment

Over the past decade, 392 patients with stage II and III rectal cancer have been managed with preoperative chemoradiation and surgery at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). Aggressive surgical techniques such as total mesorectal excision, proctectomy with coloanal anastamosis, and multivisceral excisions have been used. Initial pelvic chemoradiation is also used in patients who present with metastases. Preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery has resulted in excellent sphincter preservation (SP) and pelvic control with minimal acute, perioperative, and late morbidity. SP has been achieved in greater numbers of patients over the past 3 years due to the increased use of coloanal anastamosis in very low tumors. There has been no increase in pelvic failure or perioperative morbidity with this practice. Patients with clinical T4 disease have significantly worse pelvic control. An assessment of the impact of CB on pelvic control and survival requires further follow-up. Poor differentiation and poor response to preoperative therapy predict a worse overall survival. Durable symptom control without colostomy has been achieved using initial chemoradiation in patients who present with metastases. Aggressive bowel management and skin care can minimize hospitalization and treatment interruption due to acute toxicity. Multidisciplinary therapy using preoperative chemoradiation and aggressive surgery has resulted in excellent SP and pelvic control. However, more effective systemic therapies are needed, especially for patients who do not respond well to preoperative chemoradiation.     

The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound in predicting the pathological stage of low-lying rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation therapy

Purpose: There has been a growing interest in the use of preoperative radiation therapy in rectal cancer treatment in the last years. The need for accurate preoperative staging is important so as to avoid overtreatment in stage I patients, and to select patients who require downstaging prior to surgery as they are technically inoperable. While transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has been reported to accurately stage preoperative patients, its efficacy postradiation has been questioned. The authors report a series studied by TRUS to contribute to the discussion on the role of this method.

Methods and Materials: Twenty-eight patients with rectal cancer were accrued. Twenty-six patients, clinically staged T2-T4 or/and N1-N3 between March 1990 to October 1993, underwent preoperative chemoradiation. Two patients (T2N0) were treated by local excision and postoperative radiotherapy. Following therapy and just before surgery, each patient was restaged by TRUS. These results were subsequently compared with a pathological stage of resected specimen for both the primary tumor (T) and regional lymph nodes (LN).

Results: The accuracy of TRUS for T stage after chemoradiation was 92.8% (positive predictive value [PPV] 94.4%, negative predictive value [NPV] 90.0%). The accuracy for LN staging after chemoradiation was 60.7% (PPV 100.0%, NPV 54.0%), because LN located outside the scanning range were missed.

Conclusion: Based on our results, we conclude that TRUS of the primary tumor is an accurate staging technique for patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation.     

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for primary colorectal cancer

The management of rectal cancer presents substantial challenges. Patients with T3 and/or node-positive rectal cancers are at high risk for local failure and distant metastases (DM). Adjuvant radiation has been shown to decrease local recurrence (LR) rates; however, this local therapy has not been demonstrated to improve survival when compared to surgery alone. In several prospective randomized trials adjuvant chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil-(5-FU)-based chemotherapy improved LR rates, DM rates, and overall survival (OS). The optimal chemotherapeutic regimen has not been determined; however, studies comparing standard IV bolus 5-FU administration with continuous infusion (CI) 5-FU demonstrated that CI administration was superior. Preoperative therapy has potential advantages over adjuvant therapy such as less acute bowel toxicity and improved sphincter preservation. Preoperative chemoradiation has been shown in several studies to improve LR rates and OS when compared to surgery alone. Our current approach to patients with resectable T3 or N1 cancer in the distal two-thirds of the rectum on preoperative staging is preoperative chemoradiation with planned postoperative chemotherapy. This regimen offers the best chance for local control and disease-free survival while potentially downstaging the tumor and improving sphincter preservation.     

Preoperative concomitant radiochemotherapy with a 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid bolus in the combined treatment of locally advanced extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a long-term analysis on 27 patients

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Many studies of preoperative chemoradiation in resectable rectal cancer have focused on down-staging and sphincter-saving procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term outcome in resectable rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation and surgery by only one surgical team irrespective of the tumor downstaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 1992 to 2001, in a cooperative study between the Institute of Semeiotica Chirurgica and the Division of Radiotherapy of the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 27 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with preoperative chemoradiation, followed by surgery after 4-6 weeks, and, just for 6 of them, by adjuvant chemotherapy. Seventeen patients were staged T3 N1 (63%), 4 patients T3N0 (15%), 4 patients T3N2 (15%) and 2 T4N2 (7.5%). Twenty-three patients (85.1%) had signs of nodal involvement at combined imaging. Radiation therapy was delivered to the posterior pelvis at a dose of 45 Gy to the tumor (clinical target volume) and the whole pelvis (planning target volume). Fractionation was conventional: 1.8 Gy/day, 5 fractions a week. Radiotherapy was started on Monday for all patients and was delivered with a linear accelerator. Concomitant chemotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil (350 mg/m2/day, as an intravenous bolus on days 1-5 and 29-33 of radiotherapy) and folinic acid (L-isomer) (10 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus on days 1-5 and 29-33). This chemotherapy was generally administered about 1 hr before radiotherapy. Data were analyzed on July 2002; median follow-up was 59 months (range, 20-116 months). No patient was lost during the follow-up. RESULTS: All patients completed the treatment. Grade > 3 acute toxicity occurred in 11% of the patients and late toxicity was 15%. A pathologic complete response was recorded in 22% of patients; sphincter-preserving surgery was feasible in 44%. Seven patients died: 2 of them perioperatively, 1 patient died with local recurrence, and 1 died with distant metastases; 3 patients died during the follow-up for other causes. Five-year local control was 95% and overall survival was 84%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study, although limited in number, demonstrated good results in local control and disease-free survival with a limited toxicity.     

Sphincter Preservation After Short-term Preoperative Radiotherapy for Low Rectal Cancer - Presentation of Own Data and a Literature Review

This report is based on a series of 108 patients with clinically staged T2 (9), T3 (94) and T4 (5) rectal cancer treated with preoperative irradiation with 25 Gy, 5 Gy per fraction given for one week. In 77% of patients, the tumour was located within 7 cm of the anal verge and in 15% the anal canal was involved. Surgery was usually undertaken during the week after irradiation. For low tumours, total mesorectal excision was performed, and for middle and upper cancers, the whole circumference of the mesorectum was excised at least 2 cm below the lower pole of a tumour. Tumour was resected in 103 patients, and sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 73% of them. In the subgroup where the tumour was located higher than 4 cm from the anal verge, sphincter-preserving surgery was performed in 95%. The follow-up period ranged from 10 to 49 months, with a median of 25 months. Local recurrences were observed in 4% of patients. Anorectal dysfunction caused impairment of social life in 40% of patients and 18% admitted that their quality of life was seriously affected?however, none of them stated that they would have preferred a colostomy. These preliminary data suggest that following high dose per fraction short-term preoperative radiotherapy a high rate of sphincter-preserving surgery can be reached, with acceptable anorectal function and an acceptable rate of local failure and late complications. The results of our own data and literature review indicate the need for a randomized clinical trial comparing high dose per fraction preoperative radiotherapy with immediate surgery with conventional preoperative radiochemotherapy with delayed surgery.     

A case of esophageal cancer with intramural metastasis demonstrates a good clinical course after induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation

A 63-year-old man with dysphagia visited our hospital in February 2007. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and computed tomography revealed that he suffered from advanced esophageal cancer with intramural metastasis at clinical stage III (T3N1). The patient underwent induction chemotherapy because he had great difficulty deciding which treatment would be more beneficial for him use dash surgery or chemoradiation. The reason for his in decision was that esophageal cancer with intramural metastasis is known to have a poor prognosis after surgery, and although chemoradiation is the more attractive therapy that avoids invasive surgery, it is very difficult to predict a response. Currently, he has survived for more than 3 years with no recurrence, after chemoradiation that followed a good response to induction chemotherapy. This result suggested that induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation can be one of the useful strategies for patients who have esophageal cancer with a negative prognosis factor for surgery, such as intramural metastasis.     

Post-chemoradiation anastomotic recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: no increased risk associated with distal margin

Background and purpose

Anastomotic recurrence after radical sphincter-preserving surgery preceded by neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer is an uncommon event that merits further assessment. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of preoperative chemoradiation on the risk of anastomotic recurrence. Based on the initial extension of the tumor, we analyzed whether the distal surgical section was calculated through the virtual initial extension of the rectal tumor.

Patients and methods

Eligible patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were offered preoperative chemoradiation, sphincter sparing surgery and intraoperative radiation therapy boost.

Results

180 patients were treated with anterior resection (40 %), low anterior resection (45.6 %) and ultra-low anterior resection (14.4 %). With a median follow-up of 41.1 months (0.36–143 months), anastomotic recurrence was diagnosed in 9 patients (5 %). There was no statistical correlation with downstaging (T or N), downsizing effects, or with distance from the lower limit of the residual lesion to the distal margin. Virtual intratumoral surgical section was speculated in 44 patients (3 developed anastomotic recurrence; 6.8 vs 4.8 %, p = 0.482).

Conclusion

Anastomotic recurrence in patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation is an infrequent event. Virtual intratumoral surgical sections followed by anastomosis do not contribute to an excessive risk of recurrence. Our findings encourage the development of policies for preservation of the ano-rectal complex in rectal cancer patients.     

Current treatment and future directions in the management of anal cancer

Although rare, the rate of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is rising globally. Most patients present with nonmetastatic disease and are curable with appropriate treatment, which has evolved significantly over the last several decades. Before the 1970s, SCCA was managed with radical surgery, resulting in a permanent colostomy. Researchers found that preoperative treatment with chemotherapy and concurrent radiation could achieve a pathologic complete response. After this observation, definitive therapy shifted from radical surgery to sphincter-preserving chemoradiation. Investigations into the necessity of chemotherapy and the optimal regimen found that chemotherapy with mitomycin-C and 5-fluorouracil is required for cure. Further studies evaluating the addition of induction or maintenance chemotherapy, monoclonal antibody therapy, or higher radiation doses have demonstrated no significant benefit to disease control. Advanced radiation delivery with intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques is now considered the standard of care because of its prospectively determined, favorable acute toxicity profile compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiation. It is important to note that chemoradiation treatment response may be slow (up to 26 weeks) and should be assessed through serial clinical examinations. Today, surgical management of SCCA is reserved only for the lowest risk, early stage tumors or for recurrent/persistent disease. Current studies are evaluating radiation dose de-escalation in early stage disease and radiation dose escalation and the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced cancers. In reviewing how and why modern-day treatment of SCCA was established, the objective of this report is to reenforce adherence to current treatment paradigms to assure the best possible outcomes for patients.     

Improved Patient and Regimen Selection in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Who,How, and What Next?

Before the advent of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer, local failure represented half of treatment failures. The German Rectal Cancer Study Group trial demonstrated that NCRT along with total mesorectal excision can improve local control and the rate of sphincter-preserving surgery. Thus, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network now recommends NCRT as the standard of care for stage III and IV rectal cancer. Recent trials and analysis have questioned accepted wisdom regarding patient selection for NCRT and methods of administration. EORTC 22921 demonstrated that the addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy, regardless of timing, improved local control but not overall survival, and subgroup analysis from this study generated the hypothesis that the subgroup of patients with good pathologic response to NCRT would benefit the most from additional chemotherapy following surgery. The prognosis of rectal cancer is stage dependent, and 2 major analyses question whether T1/2 N1 and T3 N0 patients benefit from NCRT. Application of the results from these studies is hindered by imperfections in staging. Future improvement in patient selection might result from biologic analysis of tumor sensitivity. NCRT might be improved with the use of oral fluoropyrimidines and perhaps the addition of a second agent such as oxaliplatin, irinotecan, or cetuximab. Improvements in radiation, such as the use of more conformal techniques, might decrease the toxicity of therapy. Given the success of NCRT in improving local control, distant metastasis now predominates as the cause of treatment failure, and larger gains will likely be made from improvements in adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Progress in the treatment of locally advanced clinically resectable rectal cancer

There have been significant developments in the adjuvant treatment of locally advanced clinically resectable (T3 and/or N+) rectal cancer. Postoperative systemic chemotherapy plus concurrent pelvic irradiation (chemoradiation) significantly improves local control and survival compared with surgery alone. The German Rectal Cancer Trial confirmed that when chemoradiation is delivered preoperatively there is a significant decrease in acute and late toxicity and a corresponding increase in local control and sphincter preservation. Despite these advances, controversies remain. Among these controversies are the role of short-course radiation, whether postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for all patients, and if the type of surgery after chemoradiation can be modified based on tumor response. Are there more accurate imaging techniques and/or molecular markers to help identify patients with positive pelvic nodes with the goal of reducing the chance of overtreatment with preoperative therapy. Will more effective systemic agents both improve outcome and modify the need for pelvic irradiation? This review examines the advances in chemoradiation as well as addresses these and other opportunities for improvement.     

Rectal cancer: Preoperative versus postoperative irradiation as a component of adjuvant treatment

The search for improved disease control and survival for resectable but high-risk rectal cancers has led to studies that combine all 3 modalities. For surgically resected, high-risk rectal cancers, postoperative chemoradiation has been shown to improve both disease control (local and distant) and survival (disease free and overall) and was recommended as standard adjuvant treatment at the 1990 National Institute of Health Colorectal Cancer Consensus Conference. Three randomized studies showed improved overall survival (OS) and local control for patients treated with postoperative irradiation and chemotherapy when compared with surgery alone or surgery plus irradiation control arms. These include 2 US trials, Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group and Mayo/North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) and a Norway trial. Although most preoperative external beam radiation trials show reductions in local relapse with the addition of preoperative EBRT to resection, only the large Swedish trial of 1,100 patients showed a survival improvement when compared with a surgery alone control arm for resectable primary rectal cancers. In a recent pooled analysis of 3 postoperative adjuvant rectal cancer trials (NCCTG 794751, NCCTG 864751, and GI Intergroup 0114) survival and disease relapse were dependent on both TN and NT stage of disease (N substage within T stage and T substage within N stage). Even among N2 patients (4 or more positive nodes), T substage influenced 5-year OS (T1-2, 69%; T3, 48%; and T4, 38%; P < .001). Ongoing randomized trials are being conducted for patients with high-risk, resectable primary rectal cancers. The intent is to help define optimal combinations of postoperative chemoradiation (US GI Intergroup), to test sequencing issues of preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiation (Germany trial), and to determine if concurrent and maintenance 5-FU and leucovorin add to the benefits found with preoperative irradiation (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer). For subsequent trials, it may be preferable to perform separate studies, or a planned statistical analysis, for different risk groups of patients (low, intermediate, moderately high, and high), as defined in the rectal cancer pooled analysis.     

极限保肛之低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术(ISR)

结直肠外科医生从未停止对保肛手术的探索,只有在"保命、保功能"的基础上才能探讨保肛问题.直肠肿瘤患者对保留肛门有着强烈而广泛的需求.仅仅出于肿瘤学安全的考虑,不加区别地拿掉患者的肛门也是不人道的.保肛手术有很多种,但只有经内、外括约肌间切除的ISR(Intersphinc-teric resection)手术可以被称为...     

Have the changes in treatment of rectal cancer made a significant difference to our patients?

The treatment for patients with locally advanced, resectable rectal cancer has evolved over the years. Various combinations and sequences of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and total mesorectal excision (TME)-based surgery are the mainstay of current therapy. Preoperative combined chemoradiation, followed by surgery, is now the preferred treatment strategy, with the majority of patients receiving either infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine (Xeloda) with radiation. Clinical trials with oxaliplatin (Eloxatin)-based neoadjuvant chemoradiation have not shown improvement in the pathologic complete response rate (pCR) compared with 5-FU; however, final data addressing local recurrence rates and disease-free survival are pending.The use of adjuvant chemotherapy following preoperative chemoradiation and surgery has not been optimally defined. Some studies have shown that patients who obtained significant pathologic downstaging after chemoradiation and surgery have improved survival with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Since FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-FU, and oxaliplatin) is the preferred adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for stage III colon cancer based on randomized clinical trial results, FOLFOX is also recommended for rectal cancer patients as an adjuvant therapy approach.     

Long-term results of chemoradiation therapy for the patients with locally advanced (T4) esophageal cancer

The prognosis of patients with advanced esophageal cancer is still poor. Recently, concurrent chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer is being utilized with increasing frequency. In this study, we reported concurrent chemoradiation for patients with T4 esophageal cancer. From July 2000, we treated 21 consecutive patients with radiation and concurrent chemotherapy using intermittent low-dose FP chemoradiation (40 Gy radiation, 2 Gy/day, for 4 weeks 280/m(2) 5-FU intermittent 24 continuous, CDDP 8 mg/m(2)/intermittent). All patients who underwent the treatment with concurrent CRT completed the planned chemoradiation. Out of 21 patients, 2 (9.5%) showed a complete response and 9 patients (42.8%) showed a partial response. The 5-year survival rate of the T4 patients with CRT was almost the same as for those who underwent surgery alone. Concurrent chemoradiation therapy for T4 esophageal cancer patients is feasible and seems to be a standard treatment for T4 esophageal cancer patients. The results indicated that CRT is an effective therapy for advanced esophageal cancer.     

Comparison between chemoradiation protocol intended for organ preservation and conventional surgery for clinical T1-T2 esophageal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study was designed to compare treatment results of the chemoradiation protocol with conventional surgery for thoracic T1-T2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-six patients with esophageal carcinoma, clinically diagnosed as T1 (tumor invading lamina propria or submucosa) or T2 (tumor invading muscularis propria) were treated for 12 consecutive years, from July 1986 to January 1998. The conventional surgery group included 30 patients who underwent esophagectomy with regional lymph node dissection. Twenty-one of them received postoperative radiotherapy. Thirty-six patients were assigned to the chemoradiation protocol, consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (44 Gy; CDDP: 60 mg/m2, day 1, bolus; 5-FU: 400 mg/m2, day 1-4, continuous), followed by either definitive radiotherapy with high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (total 70 Gy) for responders or surgery for nonresponders as in the conventional surgery group. Surgical candidates in both groups received intraoperative radiotherapy for abdominal lymphatics since 1991. RESULTS: In the protocol group, 4 patients underwent radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and the remaining 32 underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy. Local control rates at 1 and 3 years were 85% and 70% in the T1/protocol group versus 91% and 80% in the T1/surgery group, and 83% and 83% in the T2/protocol group versus 94% and 80% in the T2/surgery group, respectively. There was no statistical significance. Overall 1- and 3-year survival rates were 100% and 83% in the T1/protocol group versus 82% and 72% in the T1/surgery group (p = 0.36), and 100% and 51% in the T2/protocol group, versus 95% and 68% in the T2/surgery group p = 0.61), respectively. There was no treatment-related mortality in either group. The rates of esophageal conservation were 92% in the T1/protocol group and 58% in the T2/protocol group. CONCLUSION: The chemoradiation protocol can result in comparable survival with conventional surgery for patients with T1-T2 esophageal carcinoma. A randomized trial between definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery is required.