Portal hypertensive bleeding

Portal hypertension bleeding is a common and serious complication of cirrhosis. All patients with cirrhosis should undergo endoscopy and be evaluated for possible causes of current or future portal hypertensive bleeding. Possible causes of bleeding include esophageal varices, gastric varices, and PHG. Patients with esophageal varices at high risk of bleeding should be treated with nonselective beta-blockers for primary prevention of variceal hemorrhage. HVPG measurements represent the optimal way to monitor the success of pharmacologic therapy. EVL may be used in those with high-risk varices who do not tolerate beta-blockers. When active bleeding develops, simultaneous and coordinated attention must be given to hemodynamic resuscitation, prevention and treatment of complications, and active control of bleeding. In cases of acute esophageal variceal (Fig. 5) and PHG bleeding, terlipressin, somatostatin, or octreotide should be started. Endoscopic treatment is provided for those with bleeding esophageal varices. If first-line therapy fails, TIPS or surgery may need to be performed. Unlike esophageal variceal or PHG bleeding, there is no established optimal treatment for gastric variceal bleeding. Individual and specific treatment modalities for acute gastric variceal bleeding must be calculated carefully after considering side effects.     

Effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt formation on portal hypertensive gastropathy and gastric circulation

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) and gastric hemodynamics. METHODS: A total of 16 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertensive gastropathy were prospectively studied. Of these, 12 patients underwent TIPS for esophageal varices and four for refractory ascites. Gastric mucosal blood flow (GMBF) was assessed by laser Doppler flowmeter, and total blood flow (TBF) in submucosa and mucosa by near-infrared endoscopy. Portal venous pressure was obtained by a transducer during the TIPS procedure. The severity of portal hypertensive gastropathy was classified as none, mild, or severe. The examinations were performed before and 2 wk after the procedure. RESULTS: TIPS significantly reduced portal venous pressure. PHG improved in all four patients with severe PHG and in five of 12 patients with mild PHG after treatment. Gastric mucosal blood flow increased from 49.0 to 55.6 ml/min/100 g after TIPS. In contrast, TBF decreased from 0.35/s to 0.27/s after treatment. Liver function tests showed no significant changes before and after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: It is considered that TIPS may have a beneficial effect on PHG at least for a short time. The mechanism by which PHG improves may be closely related to the improvement of the injured gastric perfusion in cirrhotic patients with PHG.     

Gastric mucosal responses to intrahepatic portosystemic shunting in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The response of gastric mucosal lesions in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension, namely, portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) and gastric vascular ectasia (GVE), to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) is not known. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory evaluation, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and Doppler ultrasonography were performed before placement of TIPS and 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after TIPS in 54 patients. Thirty patients had mild PHG, 10 had severe PHG, and 14 had GVE. RESULTS: Approximately 75% of the patients with severe PHG responded to TIPS as shown by improvement in endoscopic findings and by a decrease in transfusion requirements; 89% of patients with mild PHG had endoscopic resolution. Patients with GVE had neither endoscopic resolution nor a decrease in transfusion requirements after TIPS. There was no difference in mortality between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the position that severe PHG and GVE may be different lesions. Mild and severe PHG respond to TIPS. Because GVE does not respond to TIPS, we recommend that TIPS be avoided for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with GVE.     

Management of acute bleeding from portal hypertension

Gastrointestinal bleeding is a frequent and severe complication of portal hypertension. The most frequent cause of the bleeding is variceal rupture. Despite improvements in prognosis after variceal bleeding over the past two decades, the 6-week mortality rate remains high, ranging from 15 to 30%. Patients die from uncontrolled bleeding, early rebleeding, infection, or renal failure within the first weeks of a bleeding episode. Poor hepatic function, severe portal hypertension with a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) >20 mmHg, and active bleeding at endoscopy are independently associated with poor prognosis. First-line treatment includes resuscitation, prophylactic antibiotic therapy, the combined use of vasoactive drugs (started as soon as possible), and an endoscopic procedure. Reconstitution of blood volume should be done cautiously to maintain the haematocrit between 25 and 30%. Terlipressin, somatostatin, or octreotide can be used, and drug therapy is maintained from 48 h to 5 days. Ligation is the endoscopic treatment of choice in bleeding oesophageal varices; in gastric varices, obturation with cyanoacrylate is preferable. Uncontrolled bleeding should be an indication for a salvage transjugular portosystemic shunt (TIPS). In patients with Child-Pugh score A, shunt surgery might be an alternative to TIPS. Trials are currently ongoing into the precise indications of early TIPS in selected patients with an HVPG >20 mmHg, and into the usefulness of administration of recombinant activated factor VII when there is an active bleeding at endoscopy.     

The natural history of portal hypertensive gastropathy: influence of variceal eradication

OBJECTIVE: The natural history and likelihood of bleeding from portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) present in patients with portal hypertension before endoscopic variceal obliteration may differ from that in patients who develop PHG during or after variceal eradication. METHODS: A total of 967 variceal bleeders who had achieved variceal eradication by endoscopic sclerotherapy in the recent past were prospectively studied. In all, 88 (9.1%) patients (cirrhosis in 54, noncirrhotic portal fibrosis in 18, and extrahepatic portal vein obstruction in 16) had distinct mucosal lesions. PHG alone was present in 78, PHG with gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) in eight, and GAVE alone in two patients. PHG was graded as mild or severe and according to whether present before (group A) or after endoscopic intervention (group B). Patients underwent regular endoscopy at follow-up to see if the PHG was transitory (disappearing within 3 months), persistent (no change), or progressive. Bleeding from PHG lesions was defined as acute or chronic. RESULTS: Twenty-two (26%) patients had PHG before (group A) and 64 (74%) developed PHG after variceal eradication (group B). During a mean follow-up of 25.1 +/- 14.2 months, PHG lesions disappeared in group A in only two patients (9%), but in group B in 28 (44%) patients (p < 0.05). PHG lesions more often progressed in the former as compared to the latter (18% vs 9.4%, p = NS). The incidence of bleeding was higher in group A than group B (32% vs 4.7%, p < 0.02). Bleeding from PHG occurred in 10 patients (11.6%); seven of them were from group A, and all had either progressive (n = 3) or persistent (n = 4) lesions. CONCLUSIONS: PHG developing after variceal eradication is often transitory and less severe. If PHG is pre-existing, endoscopic therapy for varices could worsen the PHG, with a likelihood of bleeding. Such patients may be benefited by concomitant beta-blocker therapy.     

Nodules in antrum after variceal eradication a new finding in patients with portal hypertension

Portal hypertension is known to cause esophageal varices, gastric varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG). The prevalence of gastric varices and PHG is known to increase after eradication of esophageal varices. PHG includes the presence of a mucosal mosaic pattern, cherry red spots, and/or black-brown spots and gastric vascular ectasia (GAVE). Patients with portal hypertension in whom esophageal varices were eradicated were on follow up endoscopy for detection of recurrence of esophageal varices. Their status of PHG was assessed and patients antral nodules were enrolled. Twenty patients with antral nodules were identified over one year. Fifteen out of 20 patients had cirrhosis as etiology of portal hypertension, three had non-cirrhotic portal hypertension and two had extra-hepatic portal vein thrombosis. GAVE was seen more commonly (n=8, 40%) in patients with PHG with nodules. PHG with antral nodules is a novel endoscopic finding present both in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic portal hypertension with unknown pathogenesis, and is seen more commonly in patients with eradicated varices who are on long-term follow up.     

What's new in portal hypertension?

Portal hypertension is defined as increased pressure in the portal venous system. The most common cause of portal hypertension is cirrhosis. In this setting, there is an increase in intrahepatic resistance leading to an increase in portal pressure. By increasing portal blood flow, splanchnic vasodilation further aggravates portal hypertension. New pathogenic pathways are being established which might result in new therapeutic strategies. The presence of varices at endoscopy and/or other abdominal portosystemic collaterals confirms the diagnosis of portal hypertension. The role of non‐invasive and imaging tests in the diagnosis and prognosis of portal hypertension has been clarified. Non‐selective beta‐blockers decrease both the risk of variceal haemorrhage and hepatic decompensation. Terlipressin, somatostatin or octreotide, in combination with early endoscopic therapy, are recommended for the treatment of acute variceal haemorrhage. Early Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is effective as salvage therapy in acute variceal bleeding in selected patients and prevents rebleeding more effectively than endoscopic and medical therapy resulting in an increased survival.     

Pattern of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in northern India—An endoscopic study of 316 patients

Three hundred and sixteen patients with acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage were studied prospectively and consecutively. The most frequent cause was variceal bleeding due to portal hypertension (36%), followed by peptic ulceration (24%) and gastric erosions (19%). Variceal haemorrhage tended to be severe and had a high individual mortality rate. Associated acute mucosal lesions with portal hypertension were strikingly less frequent when compared with the experience from the West. Seven per cent of patients died of bleeding alone and an equal number of an associated systemic disorder or complication. Splenomegaly was present in all patients with a variceal haemorrhage due to non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. However, in patients with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis splenomegaly was present in 63%. Endoscopy altered the clinical diagnosis in 13.2% of patients. Based on previous experience oesophago-gastro-duodenal endoscopy has been a useful tool in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.     

Use of portal pressure studies in the management of variceal haemorrhage

Portal hypertension occurs as a complication of liver cirrhosis and complications such as variceal bleeding lead to significant demands on resources. Endoscopy is the gold standard method for screening cirrhotic patients however universal endoscopic screening may mean a lot of unnecessary procedures as the presence of oesophageal varices is variable hence a large time and cost burden on endoscopy units to carry out both screening and subsequent follow up of variceal bleeds. A less invasive method to identify those at high risk of bleeding would allow earlier prophylactic measures to be applied. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is an acceptable indirect measurement of portal hypertension and predictor of the complications of portal hypertension in adult cirrhotics. Varices develop at a HVPG of 10-12 mmHg with the appearance of other complications with HPVG > 12 mmHg. Variceal bleeding does not occur in pressures under 12 mmHg. HPVG > 20 mmHg measured early after admission is a significant prognostic indicator of failure to control bleeding varices, indeed early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in such circumstances reduces mortality significantly. HVPG can be used to identify responders to medical therapy. Patients who do not achieve the suggested reduction targets in HVPG have a high risk of rebleeding despite endoscopic ligation and may not derive significant overall mortality benefit from endoscopic intervention alone, ultimately requiring TIPS or liver transplantation. Early HVPG measurements following a variceal bleed can help to identify those at risk of treatment failure who may benefit from early intervention with TIPS. Therefore, we suggest using HVPG measurement as the investigation of choice in those with confirmed cirrhosis in place of endoscopy for intitial variceal screening and, where indicated, a trial of B-blockade, either intravenously during the initial pressure study with assessment of response or oral therapy with repeat HVPG six weeks later. In those with elevated pressures, primary medical prophylaxis could be commenced with subsequent close monitoring of HVPG thus negating the need for endoscopy at this point. All patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage should undergo HVPG measurement and those with a gradient greater than 20 mmHg should be considered for early TIPS. By introducing portal pressure studies into a management algorithm for variceal bleeding, the number of endoscopies required for further intervention and follow up can be reduced leading to significant savings in terms of cost and demand on resources.     

Risk factors for haemorrhage from oesophageal varices and acute gastric erosions

Rupture, versus erosion, is the most likely cause of variceal bleeding. The risk of rupture appears to be enhanced in large varices and varices with reddish discoloration. Incompetent perforating veins connecting varices to deeper venous systems may also be important in the pathogenesis of this event. Perhaps one-third of patients with large varices will bleed from them over a period of one to two years. Portal hypertension cannot be used to predict the future risk of bleeding among groups of patients. Nevertheless, it is possible that increases or decreases in portal pressure in individual patients may alter their bleeding risk. We and others have observed portal pressure as low as 10 mmHg in patients with clear-cut, recurrent variceal bleeding. Portal hypertension probably predisposes to gastric mucosal injury by enhancing, by an undefined mechanism, back-diffusion of acid. Consequently, haemorrhagic gastritis is more common in patients with portal hypertension than those without. Whether haemorrhagic gastritis is a more severe lesion in patients with portal hypertension is unclear.     

Underlying mechanism of portal hypertensive gastropathy in cirrhosis: A hemodynamic and morphological approach

Background and Aim:  Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) is an important cause of bleeding in patients with cirrhosis associated with portal hypertension. Histologically, the condition is characterized by dilation of the mucosal and submucosal vessels of the stomach; however, its mechanisms remain unclear. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to evaluate the role of portal and systemic hemodynamic features, humoral factors and hepatocellular function in the development and severity of PHG in patients with cirrhosis.
Methods:  Forty-six patients with cirrhosis of different etiologies underwent endoscopy. Portal hypertension was evaluated by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). The gastric mucosa was analyzed using two diagnostic methods: endoscopy according to the McCormack criteria and histological by histomorphometric analysis.
Results:  The prevalence of PHG according to the endoscopic and histomorphometric methods was 93.4% and 76.1%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in HVPG measurements between the patients with mild (16.0 ± 5.9 mmHg) and severe PHG (16.9 ± 6.5 mmHg; P  = 0.80) or between patients who did not have (15.2 ± 8.0 mmHg) and those who had PHG (16.3 ± 5.7 mmHg). No correlation was found between the presence or severity of PHG and systemic vascular resistance index ( P  = 0.53 and 0.34, respectively), Child–Pugh classification ( P  = 0.73 and 0.78, respectively) or glucagon levels ( P  = 0.59 and 0.62, respectively).
Conclusions:  The present data show no correlation between the presence or the severity of PHG and portal pressure, Child–Pugh classification or systemic hemodynamics, suggesting that other factors may be involved in the physiopathology of PHG, such as local gastric mucosal factors or other underlying factors.     

Portal hypertensive gastropathy with portal thrombosis successfully treated with partial splenic embolization

A 60-year-old man with alcoholic liver cirrhosis was admitted to our hospital with severe anemia and tarry stool. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed grade 4 esophageal varices without bleeding and severe portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) of the fornix of the stomach with oozing. These findings suggested that PHG was the cause of progression of anemia. Abdominal computed tomography demonstrated no enhancement of the main portal vein and its first branches, indicating portal thrombosis and cavernous transformation. The patient underwent partial splenic embolization (PSE) to reduce portal hypertension. Two months after PSE was performed, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed improvement of PHG and endoscopic variceal ligation was performed to treat the esophageal varices. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed partial enhancement of the main portal vein indicating improvement of portal thrombosis. One year after PSE, hemoglobin had increased from 6.0 to 11.0 g/dl without blood transfusion. Moreover, albumin level had risen from 2.8 to 3.7 g/dl, cholinesterase from 51 to 150 IU/l, and prothrombin time from 47% to 66%. PSE can be an effective alternative for the management of severe PHG with portal vein thrombosis, and it might also be effective in improving liver function.     

A patient with portal hypertension and blindness after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

We report on a case of recurrent variceal bleeding from gastric varices, which was treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and Histoacryl injection into the gastric varices. Furthermore, the patient had a small patent foramen ovale without a right-to-left shunt. After the intervention, the patient developed acute neurological disorders as a result of a cerebral paradoxical embolism. In the following, we describe the potential risk of histoacryl in paradoxical embolization when used for the injection of variceal collaterals during TIPS placement in patients with portal hypertension. The present case report shows a very rare but important complication after TIPS implantation. To avoid this complication it is recommended to perform echocardiography before all TIPS placements.     

Portal hypertensive gastropathy: A systematic review of the pathophysiology,clinical presentation,natural history and therapy

AIM: To describe the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, natural history, and therapy of portal hypertensive gastropathy(PHG) based on a systematic literature review.METHODS: Computerized search of the literature was performed via Pub Med using the following medical subject headings or keywords: "portal" and "gastropathy"; or "portal" and "hypertensive"; or "congestive" and "gastropathy"; or "congestive" and "gastroenteropathy". The following criteria were applied for study inclusion: Publication in peer-reviewed journals, and publication since 1980. Articles were independently evaluated by each author and selected for inclusion by consensus after discussion based on the following criteria: Well-designed, prospective trials; recent studies; large study populations; and study emphasis on PHG. RESULTS: PHG is diagnosed by characteristic endoscopic findings of small polygonal areas of variable erythema surrounded by a pale, reticular border in a mosaic pattern in the gastric fundus/body in a patient with cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Histologic findings include capillary and venule dilatation, congestion, and tortuosity, without vascular fibrin thrombi or inflammatory cells in gastric submucosa. PHG is differentiated from gastric antral vascular ectasia by a different endoscopic appearance. The etiology of PHG is inadequately understood. Portal hypertension is necessary but insufficient to develop PHG because many patients have portal hypertension without PHG.PHG increases in frequency with more severe portal hypertension, advanced liver disease, longer liver disease duration, presence of esophageal varices, and endoscopic variceal obliteration. PHG pathogenesis is related to a hyperdynamic circulation, induced by portal hypertension, characterized by increased intrahepatic resistance to flow, increased splanchnic flow, increased total gastric flow, and most likely decreased gastric mucosal flow. Gastric mucosa in PHG shows increased susceptibility to gastrotoxic chemicals and poor wound healing. Nitrous oxide, free radicals, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and glucagon may contribute to PHG development. Acute and chronic gastrointestinal bleeding are the only clinical complications. Bleeding is typically mild-to-moderate. Endoscopic therapy is rarely useful because the bleeding is typically diffuse. Acute bleeding is primarily treated with octreotide, often with concomitant proton pump inhibitor therapy, or secondarily treated with vasopressin or terlipressin. Nonselective β-adrenergic receptor antagonists, particularly propranolol, are used to prevent bleeding after an acute episode or for chronic bleeding. Iron deficiency anemia from chronic bleeding may require iron replacement therapy. Transjugular-intrahepaticportosystemic-shunt or liver transplantation is highly successful ultimate therapies because they reduce the underlying portal hypertension.CONCLUSION: PHG is important to recognize in patients with cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic portal hypertension because it can cause acute or chronic GI bleeding that often requires pharmacologic therapy.     

内镜治疗食管静脉曲张对门脉高压性胃病的影响

探讨内镜下硬化剂(EST)和套扎(EVL)治疗食管静脉曲张术后对门脉高压性胃病(PHG)和胃底静脉曲张(GV)的影响,对21例注射硬化剂治疗和27例套扎治疗的共48例患者进行了1年的内镜随访,观察PHG和GV的程度。结果在接受治疗3个月和1年后,PHG发生率较治疗前(35％,17/48)明显增加,分别为75％(36/48)和87％(42/48);GV较治疗前(17％,8/48)增多,分别为33％(16/48)和43％(21/48)。结论:食管静脉曲张的内镜下硬化剂和套扎治疗将加重PHG和GV且有可能增加PHG和GV的出血机会。     

The long-term efficacy of the intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for the treatment of bleeding anorectal varices in cirrhosis. A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: In patients with portal hypertension and variceal hemorrhage, the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is indicated when drug therapy or endoscopic treatment fails to control bleeding. Ruptured esophageal or gastric varices are the most frequent causes of portal hypertension-related hemorrhage, but anorectal varices may also bleed. Although several case reports have proposed TIPS in this situation, the long-term results of this procedure have not been described. METHODS: We report here the case of a 68-year-old patient with decompensated cirrhosis who presented with recurrent hematochezia due to anorectal varices. RESULTS: A successful control of bleeding could be obtained after placement of TIPS. After 3 years of follow-up, rectal bleeding did not recur, the shunt remained primarily patent, and the patient did not present overt hepatic encephalopathy. CONCLUSION: TIPS procedure should be considered as an effective treatment of recurrent bleeding from anorectal varices in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.     

Effects of Endoscopic Variceal Ligation on Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy and Gastric Mucosal Blood Flow

Objective: Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) has been recognized recently as a potential cause of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding and is associated with a change in gastric hemodynamic indices in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is the treatment of choice for esophageal varices. We investigated the early effect of EVL on PHG and gastric mucosal blood flow (GMBF).
Methods: We examined 35 cirrhotic patients who were treated by EVL. PHG was evaluated endoscopically and GMBF was measured by laser Doppler flowmetry before and 1 or 2 wk after EVL.
Results: After EVL, only two patients (5.7%) developed severe PHG, 6 (17.1%) developed mild PHG, and 27 (77.1%) showed no change in endoscopic appearance of PHG. In those patients who developed PHG, EVL significantly decreased GMBF at the corpus (   p < .05  ). However, no significant changes of GMBF at the corpus were noted after EVL in those patients who had no worsening of endoscopic features. EVL had no effect on GMBF at the antrum in any patients.
Conclusions: Endoscopic variceal ligation is safe and does not lead, at least within 1–2 wk, to worsening of gastropathy in most cases. Our finding that gastropathy developed in the presence of reduced GMBF may suggest that PHG develops as a result of congestion caused by blockade of gastric blood drainage rather than by hyperemia.     

Diagnosis and management of ectopic varices

Abstract   Ectopic varices are dilated portosystemic venous collateral vessels that may occur anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract. Ectopic varices account for approximately 5% of all hemorrhages from varices. Ectopic varices may occur as a result of portal hypertension from any cause but are more common (particularly duodenal and biliary varices) in patients with extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis. Ectopic varices may also develop following successful endoscopic obliteration of gastroesophageal varices. With the exception of isolated gastric fundal varices, ectopic varices have relatively low risk for bleeding. Diagnosis is often made by endoscopy; however, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and portal venography may be needed in some cases. Endoscopic treatment is successful in many cases and is the safest option provided bleeding is definitively controlled. Surgical options are now reserved for treatment of life-threatening bleeding or for shunt insertion in patients who are not candidates for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as a result of portal vein thrombosis. Portal decompression using TIPS, in spite of the risk for encephalopathy, is the treatment of choice for bleeding from ectopic varices that cannot be successfully managed endoscopically.     

Effect of laparoscopic splenectomy on portal hypertensive gastropathy in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension

Aim:  This study investigated the relationship between portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) and splenomegaly, and the effect of laparoscopic splenectomy on PHG in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension.
Methods:  Seventy patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension were prospectively studied. Indication for laparoscopic splenectomy was bleeding tendency in 10 patients, induction of interferon in 45, treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in seven, and treatment for endoscopic injection sclerotherapy-resistant esophagogastric varices in eight. The severity of PHG was classified into none, mild, or severe according to the classification by McCormack et al. The severity of liver disease was classified using the Child–Pugh score. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before and 1 month after the operation.
Results:  The prevalence of PHG was significantly correlated with the severity of liver disease using the Child–Pugh score. The severity of PHG was significantly correlated with the resected spleen volume. One month after the operation, PHG was improved in 16 of 17 patients with severe PHG and in 12 of 32 with mild PHG. The Child–Pugh score showed a significant improvement (6.8 ± 1.4 to 6.2 ± 1.2) at 3 months after laparoscopic splenectomy ( P  < 0.0001).
Conclusions:  PHG may be associated with splenomegaly, and laparoscopic splenectomy may have a beneficial effect on PHG, at least for a short time.