Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Denture Base Resins to Acrylic Resin Teeth: Effect of Thermocycling

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the thermocycling effects and shear bond strength of acrylic resin teeth to denture base resins.
Materials and Methods: Three acrylic teeth (Biotone, Trilux, Ivoclar) were chosen for bonding to four denture base resins: microwave-polymerized (Acron MC), heat-polymerized (Lucitone 550 and QC-20), and light-polymerized (Versyo.bond). Twenty specimens were produced for each denture base/acrylic tooth combination and were divided into two groups (n = 10): without thermocycling (control groups) and thermocycled groups submitted to 5000 cycles between 4 and 60°C. Shear strength tests (MPa) were performed with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis of the results was carried out with three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni's multiple comparisons post hoc analysis for test groups (α= 0.05).
Results: The shear bond strengths of Lucitone/Biotone, Lucitone/Trilux, and Versyo/Ivoclar specimens were significantly decreased by thermocycling, compared with the corresponding control groups ( p < 0.05). The means of Acron/Ivoclar and Lucitone/Ivoclar specimens increased after thermocycling ( p < 0.05). The highest mean shear bond strength value was observed with Lucitone/Biotone in the control group (14.54 MPa) and the lowest with QC-20/Trilux in the thermocycled group (3.69 MPa).
Conclusion: Some acrylic tooth/denture base resin combinations can be more affected by thermocycling; effects vary based upon the materials used.     

An Evaluation of Microwave-Polymerized Resin Bases for Removable Partial Dentures

Purpose The hardness, porosity, and adaptation of removable partial dentures fabricated with one heat-polymerized denture base resin and two resins designed for microwave polymerization were evaluated. Materials and Methods Five prostheses were evaluated for each resin. Adaptation of the denture bases to the master cast was evaluated by spatial orientation and mean weight of residual impression material. The prostheses were then embedded in epoxy resin and sectioned for evaluation of resin hardness (Knoop hardness) and microporosity. Results There were no significant differences in the adaptation of the acrylic resin bases for Acron MC and Ch Lucitone. There was no significant difference in the mean Knoop hardness values for any of the resin bases near and away from the metal. None of the denture bases showed porosity greater than 100 μm. Conclusions Both resin bases formulated for microwave polymerization were effectively polymerized around metal frameworks without adverse effects on resin hardness or porosity. Justi Denture Base material had poorer base adaptation than the other two resins.     

Tensile bond strength of acrylic resin denture teeth to a microwave- or heat-processed denture base

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Fracture of acrylic resin prosthetic teeth from acrylic resin denture bases can be a problem for some patients. The optimal combination of acrylic resin denture tooth, denture base material, and processing method is not known. Purpose. The objective of this study was to compare the tensile bond strengths of heat- and microwave-polymerized acrylic resins among 4 types of acrylic resin denture teeth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Heat-polymerized (Lucitone 199) and microwave-polymerized (Acron MC) acrylic resins were used. Four types of acrylic resin denture teeth (IPN, SLM, Vitapan, and SR-Orthotyp-PE) were milled to a fixed diameter according to ADA specification no. 15. Ten specimens of each tooth type were processed to each of the denture base materials according to the manufacturers' instructions. Ten additional resin control specimens without teeth also were fabricated. Specimens were thermocycled and tested for strength until fracture with a custom alignment device. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test. A scanning electron microscope was used to identify adhesive and cohesive failures within debonded specimens. RESULTS: The mean force required to fracture the specimens ranged from 5.3 +/- 3.01 to 21.6 +/- 5.2 MPa for the microwave-polymerized base and 11.2 +/- 3.0 to 39.1 +/- 5.1 MPa for the heat-polymerized base. The most common failure was cohesive within the denture tooth. With each base material, Orthotyp and IPN teeth exhibited the highest bond strengths; SLM and Orthotyp bond strengths were similar. In general, heat-polymerized groups failed cohesively within the denture base resin or the tooth, and microwave-polymerized groups failed adhesively at either the ridge lap or occlusal surface of the denture tooth. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that the type of denture base material and denture tooth selected for use may influence the tensile bond strength of the tooth to the base. Selection of more compatible combinations of base and resin teeth may reduce the number of prosthesis fractures and resultant repairs.     

3种义齿基托材料抛光后表面粗糙度的比较研究

目的研究3种义齿基托材料抛光前后的表面粗糙度度。方法选择聚甲基丙烯酸基托树脂（PMMA）、弹性义齿材料和不碎胶等3种义齿基托材料,将材料制成12mm×12mm×2mm的标准试件,每种材料各20个,对试件进行打磨和抛光后,采用表面轮廓测量仪检测材料抛光前后的表面粗糙度,通过扫描电镜对材料表面形貌进行表面观察。结果PMMA、弹性义齿材料和不碎胶抛光后表面粗糙度分别为（0．160±0．018）μm、（0．110±0．011）μm和（0．141±0．017）μ。弹性义齿材料和不碎胶的表面粗糙度低于PMMA（P〈0．05）,表面划痕也少于PMMA。结论弹性义齿材料和不碎胶更能获得抛光效果,表面粗糙度优于PMMA。     

Effect of chemical disinfectants on the transverse strength of heat-polymerized acrylic resins submitted to mechanical and chemical polishing

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Immersion in chemical solutions used for cleansing and disinfecting prostheses can decrease the strength of denture base resins, making them more prone to fracture during use. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of immersion in different chemical disinfectants for varying time periods on the transverse strength of 3 mechanically or chemically polished heat-polymerized acrylic resins. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 630 rectangular specimens (65 x 10 x 3 mm), 210 per resin (Classico, Lucitone 550, and QC-20), were fabricated. One side of each specimen was not polished and the other was either mechanically (n=300) or chemically (n=300) polished, and immersed for 10, 20, 30, 45, or 60 minutes in either 1%, 2.5%, or 5.25% sodium hypochlorite or 2% glutaraldehyde. Mechanically polished (n=15) and chemically polished (n=15) control specimens were immersed only in distilled water. The transverse strength (N/mm 2 ) was tested for failure in a universal testing machine, at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. Data were statistically analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Student t test. Multiple comparisons were performed using Tukey and Scheffe tests (alpha=.05). RESULTS: There was significant difference (P < .01) between types of polishing, with chemical polishing resulting in lower transverse strength. ANOVA identified significant differences (P < .01) in strength between mechanically polished Lucitone 550 and QC-20, and among all 3 chemically polished resins. No significant differences were observed between resins submitted to both types of polishing or between different immersion periods (10 to 60 minutes), disinfectants, or interaction. CONCLUSIONS: Lucitone 550 resin presented the greatest transverse strength values with both types of polishing. Among the mechanically and chemically polished specimens, transverse strength was not affected after immersion in the disinfectants for the immersion periods tested (10 to 60 minutes). Chemically polished control and experimental (immersed in all solutions) QC-20 specimens showed significant differences in transverse strength values.     

Efficacy of conventional and experimental techniques for denture repair

This study investigated the efficacy of one experimental and three conventional techniques for denture repair. Forty maxillary dentures were constructed in dental stone casts duplicated from an edentulous copper-aluminium maxillary master cast. Two groups of 20 dentures each were prepared with Lucitone 199 (water-bath, 8 h/74 degrees C) or Acron MC (microwave, 3 min/500 W) denture base materials processed in gypsum moulds. The 40 dentures were all separated sagittally in the middle. After that, five dentures of each denture base material were repaired with one of the four following techniques: L (Lucitone 199, water-bath, 8 h/74 degrees C, gypsum mould), A (Acron MC, microwave, 3 min/500 W, gypsum mould), AR (Acron MC/R, autopolymerized, 60 psi/45 degrees C/15 min) and the experimental technique AS (Acron MC, 1 min/500 W + 1 min/0 W + 1 min/500 W, hard silicone mould). The parameters denture accuracy (DA), horizontal (HC) and vertical changes (VC) of the occlusal plane measured the efficacy of the repair techniques. The DA was determined by weighing a film of silicone impression material set in contact to the tissue surface of the denture seated on the metallic master die. For HC, cross-arch measurements were made among reference marks drilled on the teeth 11, 21, 16 and 26. The VC was obtained by calculating the relative differences in height between similar teeth of each semi-arch (pairs 13-23, 14-24, 15-25 e 16-26). For DA, HC and VC, the percentage differences between the percentage means obtained before and after repair were calculated and grouped for comparisons. Analysis of variance (SuperANOVA) and means compared by Tukey-Kramer intervals (0.05) revealed that AR repair had the best percentage difference value for DA [0.5% (P < 0.05)], while the others were not statistically different [L = 27.2%, A = 28.9%, AS = 21.2% (P > 0.05)]. For HC, there was a statistical difference (P < 0.05) between AR and the other techniques for the tooth pairs, 16-26, 11-26 and 21-16; repairs with AR and AS differed for the 11-21 pair, while those with A and AS techniques differed for the 16-26 pair (P < 0.05). The VC differences were not detected between repair methods (P > 0.05). Denture accuracy was not affected by the interaction of base material-repair technique; repair with AR technique gave the best adaptation; the interaction of base material-repair technique did not affect HC; HC was affected by the repair technique.     

Some flexural properties of a nylon denture base polymer

Nylon denture base material could be a useful alternative to poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) in special circumstances such as patient allergy to the monomer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural properties of a nylon denture base material (Lucitone FRS), a conventional compression-moulded heat-polymerized (Meliodent), a compression-moulded microwave-polymerized (Acron MC) and an injection-moulded microwave-polymerized (Lucitone 199) PMMA polymers. The effect of aldehyde-free, oxygen releasing disinfectant solution (Perform) on these properties was also investigated. The flexural modulus and the flexural strength were assessed with a three-point bending test. Specimens were stored in water at a temperature of 37 degrees C for 30 days. For each material, half of the prepared specimens were randomly selected and immersed in the disinfectant 24 h prior to testing. Results were compared statistically at a confidence level of 95%. The result showed that in both the control and disinfected groups, the flexural modulus of nylon was significantly lower than the three PMMA polymers. The flexural strength of nylon was significantly lower than those of Meliodent and Acron MC but was comparable with Lucitone 199. A 24-h immersion in the disinfecting solution increased the rigidity of nylon denture base material.     

Effect of Microwave Disinfection Procedures on Torsional Bond Strengths of Two Hard Chairside Denture Reline Materials

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the potential effects of denture base resin water storage time and an effective denture disinfection method (microwave irradiation at 650 W for 6 minutes) on the torsional bond strength between two hard chairside reline resins (GC Reline and New Truliner) and one heat-polymerizing denture base acrylic resin (Lucitone 199). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cylindrical (30 x 3.9 mm) denture base specimens (n= 160) were stored in water at 37 degrees C (2 or 30 days) before bonding. A section (3.0 mm) was removed from the center of the specimens, surfaces prepared, and the reline materials packed into the space. After polymerization, specimens were divided into four groups (n= 10): Group 1 (G1)--tests performed after bonding; Group 2 (G2)--specimens immersed in water (200 ml) and irradiated twice (650 W for 6 minutes); Group 3 (G3)--specimens irradiated daily until seven cycles of disinfection; Group 4 (G4)-specimens immersed in water (37 degrees C) for 7 days. Specimens were submitted to a torsional test (0.1 Nm/min), and the torsional strengths (MPa) and the mode of failure were recorded. Data from each reline material were analyzed by a two-way analysis of variance, followed by Neuman-Keuls test (p= 0.05). RESULTS: For both Lucitone 199 water storage periods, before bonding to GC Reline resin, the mean torsional strengths of G2 (2 days--138 MPa; 30 days--132 MPa), G3 (2 days--126 MPa; 30 days--130 MPa), and G4 (2 days--130 MPa; 30 days--137 MPa) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than G1 (2 days--108 MPa; 30 days--115 MPa). Similar results were found for Lucitone 199 specimens bonded to New Truliner resin, with G1 specimens (2 days-73 MPa; 30 days--71 MPa) exhibiting significantly lower mean torsional bond strength (p < 0.05) than G2 (2 day--86 MPa; 30 days--90 MPa), G3 (2 days--82 MPa; 30 days--82 MPa), and G4 specimens (2 days--78 MPa; 30 days--79 MPa). The adhesion of both materials was not affected by water storage time of Lucitone 199 (p > 0.05). GC reline showed a mixed mode of failure (adhesive/cohesive) and New Truliner failed adhesively. CONCLUSIONS: Up to seven microwave disinfection cycles did not decrease the torsional bond strengths between the hard reline resins, GC Reline and New Truliner to the denture base resin Lucitone 199. The effect of additional disinfection cycles on reline material may be clinically significant and requires further study.     

Hardness of heat-polymerized acrylic resins after disinfection and long-term water immersion

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: In selecting a disinfectant for dental prostheses, compatibility between the disinfectant and the type of denture base material must be considered to avoid adverse effects on the hardness of the acrylic resin. PURPOSE: This study investigated the hardness of 2 denture base resins after disinfection and long-term water immersion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two disk-shaped specimens (13 mm in diameter and 8 mm thick) were fabricated from each resin (Lucitone 550 and QC-20), polished, stored in water at 37 degrees C for 48 hours, and submitted to hardness tests (Vickers hardness number [VHN]) before disinfection. Disinfection methods included scrubbing with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate for 1 minute, immersion for 10 minutes in 1 of the tested disinfectant solutions (n=8) (3.78% sodium perborate, 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, or 1% sodium hypochorite), and immersion in water for 3 minutes. The disinfection procedures were repeated 4 times, and 12 hardness measurements were made on each specimen. Control specimens (not disinfected) were stored in water for 56 minutes. Hardness tests (VHN) were also performed after 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days of storage in water. Statistical analyses of data were conducted with a repeated measures 3-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey post-hoc test (alpha=.05). RESULTS: Mean values +/- SD for Lucitone 550 (16.52 +/- 0.94 VHN) and QC-20 (9.61 +/- 0.62 VHN) demonstrated a significant (P <.05) decrease in hardness after disinfection, regardless of material and disinfectant solutions used (Lucitone 550: 15.25 +/- 0.74; QC-20: 8.09 +/- 0.39). However, this effect was reversed after 15 days of storage in water. Both materials exhibited a continuous increase (P <.05) in hardness values for up to 60 days of water storage, after which no significant change was observed. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, QC-20 and Lucitone 550 specimens exhibited significantly lower hardness values after disinfection regardless of the disinfectant solution used.     

Assessment of flexural strength and color alteration of heat-polymerized acrylic resins after simulated use of denture cleansers

The purpose of this study was to assess flexural strength and color alteration of acrylic resins immersed in denture cleansers for different periods of time. Rectangular specimens (65 x 10 x 3mm) made from three heat-polymerized acrylic resins (Lucitone 550, QC-20 and Triplex) were assigned to three denture cleansers groups (Bony Plus, Corega Tabs and Efferdent Plus) and a control group (immersion in water). Soaking trials of 15 min and 8 h simulated 30 days of use. Flexural strength testing was carried out with 105 specimens on a universal testing machine. Color alterations were visually assessed by examination of photographs taken from 21 specimens. Flexural strength means (in MPa) were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. There were significant differences (p<0.01) among the resins Lucitone (89.439 +/- 7.962), Triplex (88.024 +/- 5.167) and QC-20 (83.379 +/- 7.153). No significant differences (p>0.05) were found either among the denture cleansers (Bony Plus = 87.693 +/- 6.943; Corega Tabs = 86.955 +/- 7.114; Efferdent Plus = 86.195 +/- 7.865 and control = 86.536 +/- 7.012) or between the soaking periods (15 min = 86.875 +/- 7.625 and 8 h = 87.432 +/- 7.355) throughout the soaking cycles simulating 30 days of use. No color alterations were identified by visual examination. The findings of this study showed that chemical denture cleansers used according to the manufacturers' specifications did not cause flexural strength alterations or color changes in heat-polymerized acrylic resins submitted to soaking cycles that simulated 30 days of use.     

三种义齿基托材料抗白色念珠菌黏附性能的比较

目的比较3种义齿基托材料的抗白色念珠菌黏附性能。方法将热凝基托树脂、不碎胶树脂、弹性材料树脂义齿基托材料制备成粗糙度相同的标准试样,每组10个。用白色念珠菌(ATCC 90028)菌液对各试样黏附培养24h、48h、168h后,分析白色念珠菌对试件表面的黏附。结果在培养24h时,3组试件白色念珠菌黏附量差异无统计学意义(P0.05);培养48h时,除不碎胶树脂组和弹性材料树脂组外,其余两两之间差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);培养168h时,3组试件两两之间差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),白色念珠菌黏附量计数,热凝基托树脂不碎胶树脂弹性材料树脂。结论与传统热凝树脂基托相比较,不碎胶树脂基托和弹性材料树脂基托能减少白色念珠菌的黏附。     

Evaluation of porosity in microwave-processed acrylic resin using a photographic method

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The effect of microwave polymerization on the porosity of denture base resin has not been fully determined. PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of microwave energy on the porosity of 2 heat-activated denture base resins. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two heat-activated denture base resins, one conventional (Paladon 65) and one designed for microwave polymerization (Acron MC), were used to prepare 50 test specimens. Five groups of 10 specimens each were established: Group A (Paladon 65, water bath); Group B(1) (Paladon 65, short microwave cycle); Group B(2) (Paladon 65, long microwave cycle); Group C(1) (Acron MC, short microwave cycle); and Group C(2) (Acron MC, long microwave cycle). Half of the specimens in each group were 3 mm thick, the other half 6 mm thick. After being polymerized, specimens were cut so that 3 cross-sectional areas were formed (S(1), S(2), and S(3)). These surfaces were polished and photographed under a microscope at x100 magnification. On the developed photographs, the area of each pore was measured with a digital planimeter, and the total area of pores per surface was calculated in percentage form. The total number of pores on each surface and the topographical distribution of the pores also were recorded. A 3-factor repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare porosity data, and a 1-way analysis of variance was performed to determine possible interactions between groups based on material and specimen thickness (P<.05). The effect of surface area on porosity data was analyzed with the use of contrasts. RESULTS: Group A specimens exhibited no pores. In the thicker specimens of Groups B(1) and B(2), giant pores (area as great as 3.69 mm(2)) and small, gaseous pores of almost uniform shape and size were found. In Groups C(1) and C(2), only the smaller pores were found; these were not clinically significant. Of the observed surfaces, 75.3% were free of pores and 24.7% contained at least one pore. In a selected group of pore-bearing surfaces, the majority (81%) had pores located near the center. The thicker specimens in Group B exhibited the greatest amount of porosity (P<.0001); Group C specimens exhibited the least porosity. Repeated-measures analysis of variance showed that polymerization cycle had no effect on porosity (P=.19). The 3 other factors (material, specimen thickness, and surface) and all possible interactions among them were significant (P<.05). Among the surfaces, S(1) and S(2) exhibited the highest total mean value of porosity (0.71% and 0.74%, respectively) and S(3) the lowest (0.025%). S(3) showed a different pattern of porosity than S(1) and S(2). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, minor porosity was identified in thin and more severe porosity in thicker areas of conventional resin specimens that underwent microwave polymerization. The resin designed specifically for microwave polymerization exhibited no clinically significant porosity.     

Effect of pre-processing surface treatments of acrylic teeth on bonding to the denture base

Summary  The aim of this study was to examine the bond strength between acrylic teeth after various surface treatments and processing with either a heat- or microwave-polymerized denture base material. Specimens were prepared and tested according to the methods described in American National Standard/American Dental Association Specification No.15 (Synthetic Polymer Teeth) using a special assembly. Three brands of acrylic teeth were used with the following treatments: control (no treatment), grinding and grinding plus sandblasting. Treatment groups were further divided into two denture base processing subgroups: heat-polymerized and microwave-polymerized methods. Denture base processing to the acrylic teeth was performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine with five specimens and each specimen is composed of six anterior teeth per experimental group. Data were analysed using a three-way anova and the Scheffe' F -test post hoc pair wise comparison at the 95% significance level. The mean bond strength values ranged from 33.1 ± 4.1 to 51.6 ± 2.5 MPa. The bond strength values of sandblasted surfaces were significantly higher than those of the ground surface and the control ( P  < 0.05). Combined (acrylic tooth and denture base resin) cohesive failures were disclosed in all tested samples. Acrylic tooth surface pre-processed surface treatment with grinding plus sandblasting and processed with a heat-polymerized denture base provided the greatest bond strength between acrylic tooth and denture base.     

Comparison of shear bond strengths of different types of denture teeth to different denture base resins

PURPOSETo determine the shear bond strengths of different denture base resins to different types of prefabricated teeth (acrylic, nanohybrid composite, and cross-linked) and denture teeth produced by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology.MATERIALS AND METHODSPrefabricated teeth and CAD/CAM (milled) denture teeth were divided into 10 groups and bonded to different denture base materials. Groups 1–3 comprised of different types of prefabricated teeth and cold-polymerized denture base resin; groups 4–6 comprised of different types of prefabricated teeth and heat-polymerized denture base resin; groups 7–9 comprised of different types of prefabricated teeth and CAD/CAM (milled) denture base resin; and group 10 comprised of milled denture teeth produced by CAD/CAM technology and CAD/CAM (milled) denture base resin. A universal testing machine was used to evaluate the shear bond strength for all specimens. One-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test were used for analyzing the data (α=.05).RESULTSThe shear bond strengths of different groups ranged from 3.37 ± 2.14 MPa to 18.10 ± 2.68 MPa. Statistical analysis showed significant differences among the tested groups (P<.0001). Among different polymerization methods, the lowest values were determined in cold-polymerized resin.There was no significant difference between the shear bond strength values of heat-polymerized and CAD/CAM (milled) denture base resins.CONCLUSIONDifferent combinations of materials for removable denture base and denture teeth can affect their bond strength. Cold-polymerized resin should be avoided for attaching prefabricated teeth to a denture base. CAD/CAM (milled) and heat-polymerized denture base resins bonded to different types of prefabricated teeth show similar shear bond strength values.     

Glutaraldehyde release from heat-polymerized acrylic resins after disinfection and chemical and mechanical polishing

This study evaluated the release of glutaraldehyde from heat-polymerized acrylic resins subjected to disinfection followed by chemical and mechanical polishing. Ninety disc-shaped specimens (15 x 4 mm), 30 per resin (Lucitone 550, QC-20 and Classico), were made and assigned to 2 groups according to the type of polishing. One side of each specimen was not polished and the other was either mechanically (n = 45) or chemically (n = 45) polished, and immersed in water at 50 °C for 1 h to allow the release of intrinsic substances and then kept in distilled water for 7 days. The specimens were disinfected by immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde for 10 min. After this period, 3 specimens from each group were immersed in water for 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min. For the 15-, 30-, 60-min immersions, 4 water exchanges were done at the end of period. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to detect and quantify the glutaraldehyde released after each period. Data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were done by Tukey's and Scheffé's tests (α = 0.05). No glutaraldehyde release was observed from the specimens with chemical polishing at any of the immersion periods, while the mechanically polished specimens released glutaraldehyde. In the groups with water exchanges, Lucitone released more disinfectant in the 15-min period (0.040 μg/mL), Classico in the 30-min (0.021 μg/mL) and 60-min (0.018 μg/mL) periods, and QC-20 the same amount (-1.760 μg/mL) in all periods. In the groups without water exchanges, Lucitone released the highest amount of disinfectant (-1.370 μg/mL), differing significantly from QC-20 (0022 g/mL) and Classico (0019 g/mL), which were similar. The findings of this showed that chemically polished specimens from the 3 resin brands did not release glutaraldehyde after different periods of immersion, while glutaraldehyde release was observed from the mechanically polished specimens, especially from those made of Lucitone resin.     

In vitro evaluation of the influence of repairing condition of denture base resin on the bonding of autopolymerizing resins

Statement of problem

Bonding failures of repair resin to denture base resin occurs when denture base resin is wet, however, little is known of how water relates to failures.

Purpose

This study evaluated the influence of water absorbed in denture base resin on the bond strength and resistance to cyclic thermal stresses of autopolymerizing resins bonded to denture base resin.

Material and methods

Denture base resin disks (n = 180; 12 mm diameter and 3 mm thick) were fabricated from heat-polymerized acrylic resin (Lucitone 199). The disks were divided into groups (n=60) with 3 conditions of water content: (1) complete water saturation (control), (2) superficial desiccation by blowing air on the specimen, or (3) complete desiccation. Each denture base specimen received 1 of 3 surface treatments (n=20) including: (1) no treatment, (2) airborne-particle abrasion, or (3) methylene chloride application. An autopolymerizing repair resin (Repair Material, n=10) or reline resin (Tokuso Rebase Normal set, n=10) was applied to the bonding area (5 mm diameter) and polymerized at 37°C for 10 minutes. The resistance to cyclic thermal stress was determined after subjecting the specimens to 50,000 thermal cycles between 4°C and 60°C water baths with a 1-minute dwell time (n=5 per group). Bond strength (MPa) was measured by shear bond testing at a 1.0 mm/min crosshead speed until the applied resin debonded from denture base resin. Data were statistically analyzed by 3-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons among the groups were performed with Bonferroni test (α=.05).

Results

The mean bond strengths of repair resin to airborne-particle-abraded denture base specimens were not significantly influenced by either thermal cycling or water content. The mean bond strengths of reline resin significantly decreased after thermal cycling (P<.0001) regardless of the conditions of surface treatment and water content. For methylene chloride treated specimens, bond strengths of both repair and reline resins to completely water saturated specimens were significantly higher than those of completely desiccated specimens (P=.0048 for repair resin, P<.0001 for reline resin) after thermal cycling.

Conclusions

Bond strengths of autopolymerizing resin to denture base resin were not significantly influenced by water content of denture base resin but were significantly influenced by resin type, thermal cycling, and surface treatment.     

不同表面处理对义齿软衬树脂黏结强度的影响

目的:探讨4种不同表面处理对义齿软衬树脂与硬质树脂之间黏结强度影响。方法:制作热凝硬质基托树脂试件(直径8mm,长度15mm)和热凝义齿软衬树脂试件(厚4mm,直径10mm),然后将2个硬质树脂试件黏结在软衬树脂正反两面的中心。采用4种不同表面处理方式——第1组,对照组,不加任何处理;第2组,喷砂粗化处理;第3组,专用黏结剂涂布表层;第4组,表层涂布 喷砂粗化。每组各10个试件,分别测定黏结强度,采用SPSS10.0软件进行单因素方差分析。结果:第1、2、3、4组的平均黏结强度分别为3.518、2.834、4.077和3.852MPa。F=6.40,P<0.0014。表层涂布组的黏结强度最高,而喷砂组的黏结强度最低。结论:使用专用黏结剂表层涂布,可显著增强义齿软衬树脂的黏结强度;而进行喷砂处理,反而会使黏结强度下降。     

Effect of microwave disinfection on the hardness and adhesion of two resilient liners

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Microwave irradiation has been suggested for denture disinfection. However, the effect of this procedure on the hardness and bond strength between resilient liners and denture base acrylic resin is not known. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of water storage time and microwave disinfection on the hardness and peel bond strength of 2 silicone resilient lining materials to a heat-polymerized acrylic resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Acrylic resin (Lucitone 199) specimens (75 x 10 x 3 mm) were stored in water at 37 degrees C (2 or 30 days) before bonding (n = 160). The resilient lining materials (GC Reline Extra Soft and Dentusil) were bonded to the denture base and divided into the following 4 groups (n = 10): Tests performed immediately after bonding (control); specimens immersed in water (200 mL) and irradiated twice, with 650 W for 6 minutes; specimens irradiated daily for 7 total cycles of disinfection; specimens immersed in water (37 degrees C) for 7 days. Specimens were submitted to a 180-degree peel test (at a crosshead speed of 10 mm/min) and the failure values (MPa) and mode of failure were recorded. Pretreatment and posttreatment hardness measurements (Shore A) of the resilient materials were also performed. Three-way analysis of variance, followed by the Tukey HSD test, was performed (alpha = .05). RESULTS: The analysis revealed that, for all conditions, the mean failure strengths of GC Reline Extra Soft (0.95-1.19 MPa) were significantly higher ( P < .001) than those of Dentusil (0.45-0.50 MPa). The adhesion of the liners was not adversely affected by water storage time of Lucitone 199 or microwave disinfection. All peel test failures were cohesive. There was a small but significant difference ( P < .001) between the pretreatment (34.33 Shore A) and posttreatment (38.69 Shore A) hardness measurements. CONCLUSION: Microwave disinfection did not compromise the hardness of either resilient liners or their adhesion to the denture base resin Lucitone 199.     

Shear bond strength of microwaveable acrylic resin for denture repair

Microwaveable acrylic denture resins are believed to provide an effective means of repairing fractured dentures. This in vitro investigation compared the bond strength of a microwaveable acrylic resin as a denture repair material to two established auto-polymerized resins. Fifty-one specimens were made using Lucitone 199 as a simulated denture base, and were then divided into three groups of 17 samples each. Each test group was bonded with the following acrylic resins: Acron Mc, Rapid Repair and Palapress. A shear bond strength test was carried out 24 h after the samples were bonded. Fracture analysis showed that bond failure was adhesive for all groups. Shear bond values showed a statistically significant difference at P < 0.05 level between Acron Mc and Rapid Repair; Palapress and Rapid Repair, and indicated that Acron Mc and Palapress were superior to Rapid Repair as a repair material. However, there was no statistical difference found between Acron Mc and Palapress. Microwaveable acrylic resins produce repaired junctions of adequate strength.     

The effect of two fibre impregnation methods on the cytotoxicity of a glass and carbon fibre-reinforced acrylic resin denture base material on oral epithelial cells and fibroblasts

Acrylic resin dentures may have cytotoxic effects on oral soft tissues. However, there is sparse data about the cytotoxic effect of fibre-reinforced acrylic resin denture base materials. The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effect of two fibre impregnation methods on the cytotoxicity of a glass and carbon fibre-reinforced heat-polymerized acrylic resin denture base material on oral epithelial cells and fibroblasts. One hundred acrylic resin discs were assigned to five experimental groups (n = 20). One of the groups did not include any fibre. Two groups consisted of silane and monomer treated glass fibres (Vetrolex) impregnated into acrylic resin (QC-20) discs. The other two groups consisted of silane and monomer treated carbon fibres (Type Tenox J, HTA). Untreated cell culture was used as positive control. The human oral epithelial cell line and buccal fibroblast cultures were exposed to test specimens. The cytotoxicity of the test materials was determined by succinic dehydrogenase activity (MTT method) after 24 and 72 h exposures. Data were analysed with a statistical software program (SPSSFW, 9.0). A one-way analysis of variance (anova) test and Bonferroni test were used for the comparisons between the groups. All statistical tests were performed at the 0.95 confidence level (P < 0.05). After 24 and 72 h incubation, cell viability percentages of all experimental groups showed significant decrease according to the positive control cell culture. Fibroblastic cell viability percentages of silane and monomer treated fibre-reinforced groups were lower than the unreinforced group. Cell viability of monomer-treated groups displayed the lowest percentages. Elapsed incubation time decreased epithelial cell viability in silane-treated groups. Fibroblastic cell viability was not influenced by elapsed time except the unreinforced group.