The differential effects of steady-state fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of olanzapine and clozapine in healthy volunteers

The combination of atypical antipsychotics and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is an effective strategy in the treatment of certain psychiatric disorders. However, pharmacokinetic interactions between the two classes of drugs remain to be explored. The present study was designed to determine whether there were different effects of steady-state fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of olanzapine and clozapine in healthy male volunteers. One single dose of 10 mg olanzapine (n = 12) or clozapine (n = 9) was administered orally. Following a drug washout of at least 4 weeks, all subjects received fluvoxamine (100 mg/day) for 9 days, and one single dose of 10 mg olanzapine or clozapine was added on day 4. Plasma concentrations of olanzapine, clozapine, and N-desmethylclozapine were assayed at serial time points after the antipsychotics were given alone and when added to fluvoxamine. No bioequivalence was found in olanzapine alone and cotreatment with fluvoxamine for the mean peak plasma concentration (C(max)), the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to last sampling time point (AUC(0-t)), and from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0- infinity )). Under the cotreatment, C(max) of olanzapine was significantly elevated by 49%, with a 32% reduced time (t(max)) to C(max), whereas the C(max) and t(max) of clozapine were unaltered. The cotreatment increased the AUC(0-t) and AUC(0- infinity ) of olanzapine by 68% and 76%, respectively, greater than those of clozapine (40% and 41%). The presence of fluvoxamine also prolonged the elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of olanzapine by 40% and, to a much greater extent, clozapine by 370% but reduced the total body clearance (CL/F) of clozapine (78%) more significantly than it did for olanzapine (42%). The apparent volume of distribution (V(d)) was suppressed by 31% in olanzapine combined with fluvoxamine but was unaltered in the clozapine regimen. A significant reduction in the N-desmethylclozapine to clozapine ratio was present in the clozapine with fluvoxamine regimen. The effects of fluvoxamine on different aspects of pharmacokinetics of the two antipsychotics may have implications for clinical therapeutics.     

Fluvoxamine augmentation of olanzapine in chronic schizophrenia: pharmacokinetic interactions and clinical effects

Olanzapine is a substrate of the cytochrome P450 enzyme (CYP) 1A2. In this study, pharmacokinetic interactions and clinical effects of adding the CYP1A2 inhibitor fluvoxamine to steady-state olanzapine was examined in patients suffering from schizophrenia. Eight patients had been treated for at least 3 months with 10 to 20 mg/day olanzapine. Fluvoxamine (100 mg/day) was added (week 0) to the olanzapine treatment and continued for 8 weeks. Concentrations of olanzapine and its metabolite N-desmethylolanzapine and of fluvoxamine were analyzed at weeks 0, 1, 4, and 8. Addition of fluvoxamine resulted in a 12% to 112% ( < 0.01) increase of olanzapine from 31 +/- SD 15 ng/mL (week 0) to 56 +/- 31 ng/mL (week 8) in all patients. N-desmethylolanzapine concentrations were not significantly changed ( > 0.05). Fluvoxamine concentrations were 48 +/- 26 ng/mL on week 1 and 83 +/- 47 ng/mL on week 8. It is concluded that fluvoxamine affects olanzapine degradation and thus increases olanzapine concentrations. Although the combination was well tolerated in this sample and the negative symptom response appeared to be favorable in at least five patients, the combination therapy of olanzapine and fluvoxamine should be used cautiously and should be controlled by therapeutic drug monitoring to avoid olanzapine-induced side effects or intoxications.     

Effect of fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of steady-state dosing of fluvoxamine, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and CYP2C19, on the pharmacokinetics of roflumilast, an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor and its pharmacodynamically active metabolite roflumilast N-oxide. METHODS: In an open-label, non-randomised, one-sequence, two-period, two-treatment crossover study, 14 healthy subjects received a single oral dose of roflumilast 500 microg on study day 1. After a 6-day washout period, repeated doses of fluvoxamine 50 mg once daily were given from days 8 to 21. On day 15, roflumilast 500 microg and fluvoxamine 50 mg were taken concomitantly. Percentage ratios of test/reference (reference: roflumilast alone; test: roflumilast plus steady-state fluvoxamine) of geometric means and their 90% confidence intervals for area under the plasma concentration-time curve, maximum plasma concentration (roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide) and plasma clearance of roflumilast were calculated. RESULTS: Upon co-administration with steady-state fluvoxamine, the exposure to roflumilast as well as roflumilast N-oxide increased by a factor of 2.6 and 1.5, respectively. Roflumilast plasma clearance decreased by a factor of 2.6, from 9.06 L/h (reference) to 3.53 L/h (test). The combined effect of fluvoxamine co-administration on roflumilast and roflumilast N-oxide exposures resulted in a moderate (i.e. 59%) increase in total PDE4 inhibitory activity. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of roflumilast and fluvoxamine affects the disposition of roflumilast and its active metabolite roflumilast N-oxide most likely via a potent dual pathway inhibition of CYP1A2 and CYP2C19 by fluvoxamine. The exposure increases observed for roflumilast N-oxide are suggested to be attributable to CYP2C19 co-inhibition by fluvoxamine and thus, are not to be expected to occur when roflumilast is co-administered with more selective CYP1A2 inhibitors.     

Low-dose fluvoxamine as an adjunct to reduce olanzapine therapeutic dose requirements: a prospective dose-adjusted drug interaction strategy

Despite the advances in antipsychotic pharmacotherapy over the past decade, many atypical antipsychotic agents are not readily accessible by patients with major psychosis or in developing countries where the acquisition costs may be prohibitive. Olanzapine is an efficacious and widely prescribed atypical antipsychotic agent. In theory, olanzapine therapeutic dose requirement may be reduced during concurrent treatment with inhibitors of drug metabolism. In vitro studies suggest that smoking-inducible cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 contributes to formation of the metabolite 4'-N-desmethylolanzapine. The present prospective study tested the hypothesis that olanzapine steady-state doses can be significantly decreased by coadministration of a low subclinical dose of fluvoxamine, a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 1A2. The study design followed a targeted "at-risk" population approach with a focus on smokers who were likely to exhibit increased cytochrome P450 1A2 expression. Patients with stable psychotic illness (N = 10 men, all smokers) and receiving chronic olanzapine treatment were evaluated for steady-state plasma concentrations of olanzapine and 4'-N-desmethylolanzapine. Subsequently, olanzapine dose was reduced from 17.5 +/- 4.2 mg/d (mean +/- SD) to 13.0 +/- 3.3 mg/d, and a nontherapeutic dose of fluvoxamine (25 mg/d, PO) was added to regimen. Patients were reevaluated at 2, 4, and 6 weeks during olanzapine-fluvoxamine cotreatment. There was no significant change in olanzapine plasma concentration, antipsychotic response, or metabolic indices (eg, serum glucose and lipids) after dose reduction in the presence of fluvoxamine (P > 0.05). 4'-N-desmethylolanzapine/olanzapine metabolic ratio decreased from 0.45 +/- 0.20 at baseline to 0.25 +/- 0.11 at week 6, suggesting inhibition of the cytochrome P450 1A2-mediated olanzapine 4'-N-demethylation by fluvoxamine (P < 0.05). In conclusion, this prospective pilot study suggests that a 26% reduction in olanzapine therapeutic dose requirement may be achieved by coadministration of a nontherapeutic oral dose of fluvoxamine.     

Effect of fluvoxamine on plasma risperidone concentrations in patients with schizophrenia

The effect of fluvoxamine on plasma concentrations of risperidone and its active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone (9-OH-risperidone) was investigated in 11 schizophrenic patients with prevailingly negative or depressive symptoms. Additional fluvoxamine, at the dose of 100 mg/day, was administered for 4 weeks to patients stabilized on risperidone (3-6 mg/day). Mean plasma concentrations of risperidone, 9-OH-risperidone and the active moiety (sum of the concentrations of risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone) were not significantly modified following co-administration with fluvoxamine. After 4 weeks, fluvoxamine dosage was increased to 200 mg/day in five patients and then maintained until the end of week 8. At final evaluation, mean plasma levels of risperidone active moiety were not modified in the six patients who were still receiving the initial fluvoxamine dose, while concentrations increased slightly but significantly (by a mean 26% over pretreatment; P < 0.05) in the subgroup of five subjects treated with a final dose of 200 mg/day. Fluvoxamine co-administration with risperidone was well tolerated and no patient developed extrapyramidal side effects. These findings indicate that fluvoxamine at dosages up to 100 mg/day is not associated with clinically significant changes in plasma risperidone concentrations. However, higher doses of fluvoxamine may elevate plasma risperidone levels, presumably as a result of a dose-dependent inhibitory effect of fluvoxamine on CYP2D6-and/or CYP3A4-mediated 9-hydroxylation of risperidone.     

Pharmacokinetic interaction of fluvoxamine and thioridazine in schizophrenic patients

This study investigated to what extent fluvoxamine affects the pharmacokinetics of thioridazine (THD) in schizophrenic patients under steady-state conditions. Concentrations of THD, mesoridazine, and sulforidazine were measured in plasma samples obtained from 10 male inpatients, aged 36 to 78 years, at three different time points: A, during habitual monotherapy with THD at 88 +/-54 mg/day; B, after addition of a low dosage of fluvoxamine (25 mg twice a day) for 1 week; and C, 2 weeks after fluvoxamine discontinuation. After the addition of fluvoxamine, THD concentrations relative to time point A significantly increased approximately threefold from 0.40 to 1.21 micromol/L (225%) (p < 0.002), mesoridazine concentrations increased from 0.65 to 2.0 micromol/L (219%) (p < 0.004), and sulforidazine levels increased from 0.21 to 0.56 micromol/L (258%) (p < 0.004). The THD-mesoridazine and THD-sulforidazine ratios remained unchanged during the study. Mean plasma THD, mesoridazine, and sulforidazine levels decreased at time point C, but despite fluvoxamine discontinuation for 2 weeks, three patients continued to exhibit elevated concentrations of THD and its metabolites. In conclusion, fluvoxamine markedly interferes with the metabolism of THD, probably at the CYP2C19 and/or CYP1A2 enzyme level. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of the potential for a clinical drug interaction between both compounds, and careful monitoring of THD levels is valuable to prevent the accumulation of the drug and resulting toxicity.     

Fluvoxamine affects sildenafil kinetics and dynamics

Sildenafil used as oral drug treatment for erectile dysfunction is predominantly metabolized by the cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A4. The antidepressant fluvoxamine is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, we evaluated the effects of fluvoxamine dosed to steady state on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sildenafil. Twelve healthy men received oral fluvoxamine or placebo for 10 days (50 mg every day on days 1-3; 100 mg every day on days 4-10). On day 11, all participants received a single, oral, open-label dose of 50 mg sildenafil, and blood samples were collected for analysis of sildenafil plasma concentrations by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Concurrently, the effect of sildenafil on venodilation induced by a constant dose of sodium nitroprusside was assessed using the dorsal hand vein compliance technique. Sildenafil was well tolerated in the presence of fluvoxamine. During fluvoxamine, sildenafil exposure (area under the curve) significantly increased by 40% (P < 0.001), and its half-life increased by 19% (P = 0.034). Concurrently, sodium nitroprusside-induced venodilation was significantly augmented by 59% during fluvoxamine compared to placebo (P = 0.012). In conclusion, sildenafil kinetics are mildly affected by fluvoxamine which translates into an increase in vascular sildenafil effects. Whereas the pharmacokinetic changes do not suggest a large clinically relevant interaction, it may be prudent to consider a starting dose of 25 mg in patients concurrently treated with fluvoxamine.     

Lack of Effect of Olanzapine on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Aminophylline Dose in Healthy Men

Study Objective . To test whether olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 activity, we conducted a drug interaction study with theophylline, a known CYP1A2 substrate. Design . Two-way, randomized, crossover study. Setting . Clinical research laboratory. Subjects . Nineteen healthy males (16 smokers, 3 nonsmokers). Interventions . Because the a priori expectation was no effect of olanzapine on theophylline pharmacokinetics, a parallel study using cimetidine was included as a positive control. In group 1, 12 healthy subjects received a 30-minute intravenous infusion of aminophylline 350 mg after 9 consecutive days of either olanzapine or placebo. In group 2, seven healthy subjects received a similar aminophylline infusion after 9 consecutive days of either cimetidine or placebo. Measurements and Main Results . Concentrations of theophylline and its metabolites in serum and urine were measured for 24 and 72 hours, respectively. Plasma concentrations of olanzapine and its metabolites were measured for 24 hours after the next to last dose and 168 hours after the last olanzapine dose. Olanzapine did not affect theophylline pharmacokinetics. However, cimetidine significantly decreased theophylline clearance and the corresponding formation of its metabolites. Urinary excretion of theophylline and its metabolites was unaffected by olanzapine but was reduced significantly by cimetidine. Steady-state concentrations of olanzapine (15.3 ng/ml), 10-N-glucuronide (4.9 ng/ml), and 4′-N-desmethyl olanzapine (2.5 ng/ml) were observed after olanzapine 10 mg once/day and were unaffected by coadministration of theophylline. Conclusion . As predicted by in vitro studies, steady-state concentrations of olanzapine and its metabolites did not affect theophylline pharmacokinetics and should not affect the pharmacokinetics of other agents metabolized by the CYP1A2 isozyme.     

Identification of a single time-point for plasma lansoprazole measurement that adequately reflects area under the concentration-time curve

The objective of this study was to identify a single time-point for plasma lansoprazole measurement that adequately reflects area under the plasma lansoprazole concentration-time curve (AUC) after administration of lansoprazole alone or together with coadministration with CYP mediators. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study design in 3 phases was conducted at intervals of 2 weeks. Eighteen healthy Japanese volunteers, comprising 3 CYP2C19 genotype groups, took a single oral 60-mg dose of lansoprazole after three 6-day pretreatments, that is, clarithromycin 800 mg/d, fluvoxamine 50 mg/d, and placebo. Blood samplings (10 mL each) for determination of lansoprazole were taken up to 24 hours after the administration of lansoprazole. Correlation between plasma lansoprazole concentrations at various time points and AUC0-24 were analyzed. Although there were significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of lansoprazole during clarithromycin and placebo among CYP2C19 genotypes, the differences were not found during fluvoxamine. The plasma concentrations 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours after administration (C3, C4, C6, and C8, respectively) were highly correlated with AUC0-24 in coadministration with placebo, clarithromycin, and fluvoxamine (r>0.8, P<0.001). In particular, C6 showed a correlation coefficient of 0.940, 0.992, and 0.953 in coadministration with placebo, clarithromycin, and fluvoxamine, respectively, and was the most appropriate for estimating AUC0-24. The present study demonstrates that AUC of lansoprazole can be estimated by using a single time-point at C6. This method of plasma concentration monitoring at one time-point might be more suitable for AUC estimation than reference to CYP2C19 genotypes, particularly in coadministration of CYP mediators.     

Effects of the aqueous extract from Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge on caffeine pharmacokinetics and liver microsomal CYP1A2 activity in humans and rats

Objectives The effects of the aqueous extract of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge (Danshen) on metabolism/pharmacokinetics of caffeine and on liver microsomal CYP1A2 activity in humans and rats have been investigated. Methods The effects of Danshen aqueous extract on CYP1A2 activity were determined by metabolism of model substrates in the rat in vivo and in humans and rats in vitro. HPLC was used to determine model substrates and metabolites. Key findings In the rat, single dose Danshen aqueous extract treatment (100 or 200 mg/kg, i.p.) decreased metabolism of caffeine to paraxanthine, with overall decrease in caffeine clearance (6–20%), increase in area under the curve (AUC; 7–24%) and plasma half‐life (t½ 14–16%). Fourteen‐day Danshen aqueous extract treatment (100 mg/kg/day, i.p. or 200 mg/kg/day, p.o.) decreased caffeine clearance (16–26%), increased AUC (18–31%) and prolonged plasma t½ (8–10%). Aqueous extract of Danshen (125–2000 µg/ml) competitively inhibited human and rat liver microsomal CYP1A2 activity with inhibition constant (K_i) values at 190 and 360 µg/ml, respectively. Conclusions These studies demonstrated that Danshen aqueous extract affected the metabolism of CYP1A2 substrates through competitive inhibition and altered their clearance.     

The anti-secretory effect and pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in chronic liver disease

The anti-secretory effects and pharmacokinetics of omeprazole were investigated in ten patients with chronic liver disease. Plasma omeprazole concentrations were measured after a 10-mg intravenous dose of omeprazole and on the first and seventh days of a 7-day course of 10 mg oral omeprazole daily. Pentagastrin tests were performed on the day before oral omeprazole was commenced and 24 h after the last oral dose. The pre-treatment basal and peak gastric acid outputs were low (mean rates of 1.44 mmol/h and 9.26 mmol/h, respectively) and following 7 days of oral 10 mg omeprazole daily, were lowered by 95% and 90% respectively. Following 10 mg intravenous omeprazole, plasma clearance was reduced, and plasma half-life and area under the concentration curve were increased, in comparison with previous studies in healthy subjects. The plasma concentration curves for oral and intravenous doses were very similar. After both the first and seventh oral doses, maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve were higher than in healthy subjects. No accumulation of omeprazole was demonstrated. The pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in chronic liver disease could be influenced by low gastric acidity, poor liver function and/or portasystemic shunting. A dose of 10 mg omeprazole daily has been shown to be an effective anti-secretory agent in chronic liver disease.     

Effect of methylprednisolone on CYP3A4-mediated drug metabolism in vivo

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of methylprednisolone on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of triazolam. METHODS: In this three-phase cross-over study, ten healthy subjects received 0.25 mg oral triazolam on three occasions: on day 1 (no pretreatment, control), on day 8 (1 h after a single dose of 32 mg oral methylprednisolone) and on day 18 (after further treatment with 8 mg oral methylprednisolone daily for 9 days). The plasma concentrations of triazolam were determined up to 10 h, and its effects were measured using four psychomotor tests up to 6 h. RESULTS: The single dose of methylprednisolone showed no significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of triazolam. However, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test result was better (P < 0.05) during the single-dose methylprednisolone phase than during the control phase, the other three tests showing no differences between the phases. The multiple-dose treatment with methylprednisolone reduced the mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of triazolam by 30% (P < 0.05) but had no significant effects on the time to Cmax (tmax), elimination half-life (t 1/2), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 h to 10 h (AUC(0-10 h)) and AUC(0-infinity) and did not alter the effects of triazolam. CONCLUSION: A single, relatively high dose of methylprednisolone (32 mg) did not affect cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 activity, and treatment with 8 mg methylprednisolone daily for 9 days did not result in clinically significant induction of CYP3A4.     

The effect of fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of buspirone

Objective: The effects of fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor antidepressant, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of buspirone, a non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic agent, were investigated. Methods: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, two-phase cross-over study, ten healthy volunteers took either 100?mg fluvoxamine or matched placebo orally once daily for 5 days. On day 6, 10?mg buspirone was taken orally. Plasma concentrations of buspirone and its active metabolite, 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (1-PP), were measured up to 18?h and the pharmacodynamic effects of buspirone up to 8?h. Results: The total area under the plasma buspirone concentration-time curve was increased 2.4-fold (P?<?0.05) and the peak plasma buspirone concentration 2.0-fold (P?<?0.05) by fluvoxamine, compared with placebo. The half-life of buspirone was not affected. The ratio of the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve of 1-PP to that of buspirone was decreased from 7.4 [6.3 (SD)] to 4.4 (3.6) by fluvoxamine (P?<?0.05). The results of the six pharmacodynamic tests remained unchanged. Conclusion: Fluvoxamine moderately increased plasma buspirone concentrations and decreased the production of the active 1-PP metabolite of buspirone. The mechanism of this interaction is probably inhibition of the CYP3A4-mediated first-pass metabolism of buspirone by fluvoxamine. However, this pharmacokinetic interaction was not associated with impairment of psychomotor performance and it is probably of limited clinical significance.     

In vitro and in vivo evaluations of cytochrome P450 1A2 interactions with duloxetine

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether duloxetine is a substrate, inhibitor or inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 enzyme, using in vitro and in vivo studies in humans. METHODS: Human liver microsomes or cells with expressed CYP enzymes and specific CYP inhibitors were used to identify which CYP enzymes catalyse the initial oxidation steps in the metabolism of duloxetine. The potential of duloxetine to inhibit CYP1A2 activity was determined using incubations with human liver microsomes and phenacetin, the CYP1A2 substrate. The potential for duloxetine to induce CYP1A2 activity was determined using human primary hepatocytes treated with duloxetine for 72 hours. Studies in humans were conducted using fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, and theophylline, a CYP1A2 substrate, as probes. The subjects were healthy men and women aged 18-65 years. Single-dose duloxetine was administered either intravenously as a 10-mg infusion over 30 minutes or orally as a 60-mg dose in the presence or absence of steady-state fluvoxamine (100 mg orally once daily). Single-dose theophylline was given as 30-minute intravenous infusions of aminophylline 250 mg in the presence or absence of steady-state duloxetine (60 mg orally twice daily). Plasma concentrations of duloxetine, its metabolites and theophylline were determined using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods and evaluated using mixed-effects ANOVA. Safety measurements included vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, a physical examination, ECG readings and adverse event reports. RESULTS: The in vitro results indicated that duloxetine is metabolized by CYP1A2; however, duloxetine was predicted not to be an inhibitor or inducer of CYP1A2 in humans. Following oral administration in the presence of fluvoxamine, the duloxetine area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(infinity)) and the maximum plasma drug concentration (C(max)) significantly increased by 460% (90% CI 359, 584) and 141% (90% CI 93, 200), respectively. In the presence of fluvoxamine, the oral bioavailability of duloxetine increased from 42.8% to 81.9%. In the presence of duloxetine, the theophylline AUC(infinity) and C(max) increased by only 13% (90% CI 7, 18) and 7% (90% CI 2, 14), respectively. Coadministration of duloxetine with fluvoxamine or theophylline did not result in any clinically important safety concerns, and these combinations were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Duloxetine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2; therefore, coadministration of duloxetine with potent CYP1A2 inhibitors should be avoided. Duloxetine does not seem to be a clinically significant inhibitor or inducer of CYP1A2; therefore, dose adjustment of CYP1A2 substrates may not be necessary when they are coadministered with duloxetine.     

Influence of ritonavir on olanzapine pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers

HIV infection and psychotic illnesses frequently coexist. The atypical antipsychotic olanzapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2 and glucuronosyl transferases, both of which are induced by the HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of olanzapine. Fourteen healthy volunteers (13 men; age range, 20-28 years) participated in this open-label study. Subjects received olanzapine 10 mg and blood samples were collected over a 120-hour post-dose period. Two weeks later, subjects took ritonavir 300 mg twice daily for 3 days, 400 mg twice daily for 4 days, and 500 mg twice daily for 4 days. The next morning, after 11 days of ritonavir, olanzapine 10 mg was administered and blood sampling was repeated. Plasma samples were analyzed for olanzapine with HPLC. We compared olanzapine noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameter values before and after ritonavir with a paired Student t test. Ritonavir reduced the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of olanzapine from 501 ng. hr/mL (443-582) to 235 ng. hr/mL (197-294) (p < 0.001), the half-life from 32 hours (28-36) to 16 hours (14-18) (p = 0.00001), and the peak concentration from 15 ng/mL (13-19) to 9 ng/mL (8-12) (p = 0.002). Olanzapine oral clearance increased from 20 L/hr (18-23) to 43 L/hr (38-51) (p < 0.001) after ritonavir. Ritonavir significantly reduced the systemic exposure of olanzapine in volunteers. Patients receiving this combination may ultimately require higher olanzapine doses to achieve desired therapeutic effects.     

Cytochrome P4502E1 Inhibition by Propylene Glycol Prevents Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) Hepatotoxicity in Mice without Cytochrome P4501A2 Inhibition

Abstract: Acetaminophen hepatotoxicity is associated with its biotransformation to the reactive metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine that binds to protein. Two forms of cytochrome P450, CYP2E1 and CYP1A2, have been implicated as primarily responsible for the bioactivation. To determine the relative contributions of these P450's, overnight fasted male NMRI mice were pretreated with 10 ml of 50% v/w propylene glycol/kg or fluvoxamine (10 mg/kg) at–80 and–20 min. relative to acetaminophen dosing to inhibit CYP2E1 and CYP1A2, respectively. Mice were sacrificed at 0.5 or 4 hr after a hepatotoxic dose of acetaminophen (300 mg/kg). Propylene glycol or propylene glycol plus fluvoxamine, but not fluvoxamine alone protected against acetaminophen hepatotoxicity as indicated by abolished increase in serum alanine aminotransferase activity, less depletion of hepatic glutathione and lower livenbody weight ratios. Propylene glycol inhibited the activity of CYP2E1 as indicated by 84% reduction in the clearance of 3 mg/kg dose of chlorzoxazone, whereas fluvoxamine inhibited the activity of CYP1A2 as indicated by 40% reduction in the clearance of a 10 mg/kg dose of caffeine. For this animal model, the data are consistent with the notion that hepatotoxicity is associated with bioactivation of acetaminophen by CYP2E1 but not by CYP1A2.     

Fluvoxamine but not sertraline inhibits the metabolism of olanzapine: evidence from a therapeutic drug monitoring service

Therapeutic drug monitoring data of the new atypical neuroleptic drug olanzapine were used to study interactions with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors fluvoxamine and sertraline. The distribution of the ratio of concentration/daily dose (C/D; ng/mL per mg/d) of olanzapine was compared in three groups: patients treated with olanzapine (n = 134), patients treated with olanzapine plus fluvoxamine (n = 10) concomitantly, and patients treated with olanzapine plus sertraline (n = 21) concomitantly. No significant difference was seen between the olanzapine and the olanzapine plus sertraline groups. Patients receiving fluvoxamine in addition to olanzapine had C/D ratios that were in the mean 2.3-fold higher than patients receiving olanzapine without additional fluvoxamine. This indicated that fluvoxamine inhibits the metabolism of olanzapine, probably because of inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, whereas sertraline is unlikely to interfere with the metabolism of olanzapine. Combination therapy of olanzapine and fluvoxamine should be used cautiously, and therapeutic drug monitoring should be instituted to avoid olanzapine-induced adverse effects or intoxications.     

The effect of multiple-dose, oral rifaximin on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral midazolam in healthy volunteers

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of rifaximin, an oral nonabsorbed (< 0.4%) structural analog of rifampin, to induce human hepatic and/or intestinal cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzymes, with use of a known CYP3A probe, midazolam. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover study. SETTING: Clinical research center. SUBJECTS: Twenty-seven healthy adult volunteers. INTERVENTION: During the first treatment period, subjects received a single dose of either intravenous midazolam 2 mg over 30 minutes or oral midazolam 6 mg on day 0. From days 3-10, they received rifaximin 200 mg every 8 hours. On days 6 (after the 9th dose of rifaximin) and 10 (after the 21st dose of rifaximin), subjects received a concomitant single dose of intravenous or oral midazolam. After a 15-day washout period, subjects were crossed over to the other formulation of midazolam, and the treatment schedule was repeated, with the second treatment period starting on day 26 and single-dose administration of midazolam on days 26, 32, and 36. Serial plasma samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analyses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of single-dose intravenous or oral midazolam were determined alone and after coadministration of rifaximin for 3 and 7 days. Rifaximin coadministration did not alter the measured pharmacokinetic parameters for midazolam or its major metabolite, 1'-hydroxymidazolam. The 90% confidence intervals for the maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (bioavailability) were all within 80-125% for intravenous and oral midazolam. Therefore, no drug interaction was observed between rifaximin and midazolam. Coadministration of midazolam and rifaximin was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Overall, 3-7 days of rifaximin 200 mg 3 times/day did not alter single-dose midazolam pharmacokinetics. Rifaximin also does not appear to induce intestinal or hepatic CYP3A activity.     

Role of the smoking-induced cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A2 and polymorphic CYP2D6 in steady-state concentration of olanzapine

This study investigated whether the smokinginducible cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and the polymorphic CYP2D6 play significant roles in the metabolism of olanzapine and its clinical effects at steady-state treatment. Caffeine and debrisoquine were used as measures of CYP1A2 and CYP2D6, respectively. After drug therapy for 15 days, the effect of olanzapine on the activities of CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 was also examined. Seventeen psychiatric patients (9 men and 8 women) were orally administered olanzapine, at a mean +/- standard deviation (SD) dosage of 10 mg/d for all smokers (n = 8) and 7.5 +/- 2.5 mg/d (range, 5-10 mg) for nonsmokers (n = 9;p <0.01). The plasma concentration-to-dose (C:D) ratio was closely correlated to the CYP1A2 activity ( s = -0.89;p <0.0001). The mean urinary caffeine indexes of nonsmokers and smokers were 17 +/- 8 and 101 +/- 44, respectively, indicating that smoking had induced a sixfold higher CYP1A2 activity (p <0.0001). Likewise, the olanzapine plasma C:D ratio (ng.mL.mg) was about fivefold lower in smokers (7.9 +/- 2.6) than in nonsmokers (1.56 +/- 1.1;p <0.0001). On day 15 of the antipsychotic therapy, the percentage decrease in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score relative to the predosing score (in the drug-free period) was higher for nonsmokers than for smokers (30.4 +/- 10% vs. 12.5 +/- 14%;p <0.01). Six nonsmokers and three smokers experienced side effects with olanzapine. After 15 days of drug treatment, olanzapine had caused significant (p <0.0001) and substantial CYP1A2 inhibition (by 50%) in comparison with predosing values, and such inhibition can contribute to adverse drug interactions. In conclusion, smoking-induced increased CYP1A2 activity significantly diminished plasma olanzapine concentrations and the antipsychotic effect of the drug. The performance of a simple caffeine test may assist in individualization of the olanzapine dosage.     

A pharmacokinetic interaction between carbamazepine and olanzapine: observations on possible mechanism

Objective: Olanzapine is a novel antipsychotic, which is effective against both the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia and causes fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects than conventional antipsychotics. The purpose of the present study was to assess the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between olanzapine and carbamazepine, since these agents are likely to be used concomitantly in the treatment of manic psychotic disorder. Method: The pharmacokinetics of two single therapeutic doses of olanzapine were determined in 11 healthy volunteers. The first dose of olanzapine (10 mg) was taken alone and the second dose (10 mg) after 2 weeks of treatment with carbamazepine (200 mg BID). Measurement of urinary 6-hydroxycortisol/cortisol excretion was used as an endogenous marker to confirm that induction of CYP3A4 by carbamazepine had occurred. Results: The dose of olanzapine given after a 2-week pre-treatment with carbamazepine was cleared more rapidly than olanzapine given alone. Olanzapine pharmacokinetic values for C_max and AUC were significantly lower after the second dose, the elimination half-life was significantly shorter, and the clearance and volume of distribution were significantly increased. Conclusion: Carbamazepine has been shown to induce several P450 cytochromes including CYP3A4 and CYP1A2. Since CYP1A2 plays a role in the metabolic clearance of olanzapine, the interaction may be attributed to induction of CYP1A2 by carbamazepine, leading to increased first-pass and systemic metabolism of olanzapine. The interaction is not considered to be of clinical significance because olanzapine has a wide therapeutic index, and the changes in plasma concentration of olanzapine are within the fourfold variation that occurs without concern for safety in a patient population. Received: 22 July 1997 / Accepted in revised form: 1 June 1998