Medical rehabilitation length of stay and outcomes for persons with traumatic spinal cord injury--1990-1997

OBJECTIVES: To describe changes in acute and rehabilitation length of stay (LOS) for persons with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), describe predictors of LOS, and explore year-1 anniversary medical and social outcomes. DESIGN: Longitudinal, exploratory study of patients with SCI. SETTING: Eighteen Model Spinal Cord Injury Centers across the United States. SAMPLE: A total of 3,904 persons discharged from the Model Systems between 1990 and 1997 who had follow-up interviews at 1 year postinjury. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rehabilitation LOS; injury anniversary year-1 presence of pressure ulcers; incidence of rehospitalization; community or institutional residence; and days per week out of residence. RESULTS: Acute rehabilitation LOS declined from 74 days to 60 days. Discharges to nursing homes and rehospitalizations increased between 1990 and 1997. Linear regression showed that lower admission motor Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, year of discharge from the Model System, method of bladder management, tetraplegia, race, education, marital status, discharge disposition, and age were related to longer LOS. At first anniversary, logistic regressions revealed that lower discharge motor FIM, injury level, and age were related to the presence of pressure ulcers, rehospitalization, residence, and time spent out of residence. Of those discharged to nursing homes, 44% returned to home by year 1, and these individuals had higher functional status and were younger. DISCUSSION: High functional status is associated with shorter LOS, discharge to the community, and time spent out of residence, indicating efficiency in the system. For 44.4% of individuals one or more of the following outcomes were observed by first year anniversary: rehospitalization; residing in a skilled nursing facility; having pressure ulcers; or infrequently leaving one's residence.     

Outcomes of early surgical management versus late or no surgical intervention after acute spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To compare neurologic, medical, and functional outcomes of patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI) undergoing early (<24 h and 24-72 h) and late (>72 h) surgical spine intervention versus those treated nonsurgically. DESIGN: Retrospective case series comparing outcomes by surgical and nonsurgical groups during acute care, rehabilitation, and at 1-year follow-up. SETTING: Multicenter National Spinal Cord Injury Database. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients with acute, nonpenetrating, traumatic SCI from 1995 to 2000, admitted in the first 24 hours after injury. Surgical spinal intervention was likely secondary to nature of injury and the need for spinal stabilization. Interventions Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in neurologic outcomes (motor and sensory levels, motor index score, American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] Impairment Scale [AIS]), medical complications (pneumonia and atelectasis, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, pressure ulcers, autonomic dysreflexia, rehospitalization), and functional outcomes (acute and rehabilitation length of stay [LOS], hospital charges, FIM instrument score, FIM motor efficiency scores). RESULTS: Subjects in the early surgery group were more likely ( P <.05) to be women, have paraplegia, and have SCI caused by motor vehicle collisions. The nonsurgical group was more likely ( P <.05) to have an older mean age and more incomplete injuries. ASIA motor index improvements (from admission to 1-y follow-up) were more likely ( P <.05) in the nonsurgical groups, as compared with the surgical groups. Those with late surgery had significantly ( P <.05) increased acute care and total LOS and hospital charges along with higher incidence of pneumonia and atelectasis. No differences between groups were found for changes in neurologic levels, AIS grade, or FIM motor efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: ASIA motor index improvements were noted in the nonsurgery group, though likely related to increased incompleteness of injuries within this group. Early versus late spinal surgery was associated with shorter LOS and reduced pulmonary complications, however, no differences in neurologic or functional improvements were noted between early or late surgical groups.     

Effects of gender on neurologic and functional recovery after spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To assess gender differences in neurologic and functional outcome measures in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Case series. SETTINGS: Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS) throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: People (N=14,433) admitted to an MSCIS within 30 days of injury. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor index score, ASIA Impairment Scale, level of injury, and FIM instrument scores after SCI. RESULTS: When examining subjects grouped by severity of injury, changes in ASIA motor index total scores, from system admission to 1-year anniversary, were significantly greater for women than men with either complete ( P =.035) or incomplete ( P =.031) injuries. Functional comparison of men and women, using the FIM motor subscale, revealed that men had higher FIM motor scores at rehabilitation discharge among those with motor-complete injuries, except for those with C1-4 and C6 neurologic levels. Women with motor-incomplete high tetraplegia (C1-4 levels) had higher discharge FIM motor scores than did similarly afflicted men. There were no significant differences in FIM motor scores among men and women with other levels of motor incomplete SCI. CONCLUSIONS: Gender differences in SCI were seen in several areas. Women may have more natural neurologic recovery than men; however, for a given level and degree of neurologic injury, men tend to do better functionally than women at time of discharge from rehabilitation. Future prospective study of the effects of estrogen on neurologic recovery and the effects of gender on functional potential are recommended.     

Late neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To present Model Spinal Cord Injury System (MSCIS) data on late neurologic recovery after 1 year after spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Longitudinal study of neurologic status as determined by annual evaluations at 1 and 5 years postinjury. SETTING: MSCIS centers contributing data on people with traumatic SCI to the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center database. PARTICIPANTS: People with traumatic SCI (N=987) admitted to an MSCIS between 1988 and 1997 with 1- and 5-year follow-up examinations. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) classification, motor index scores (MIS), motor level, and neurologic level of injury (NLI), measured and compared for changes over time. RESULTS: The majority of subjects (94.4%) who had a neurologically complete injury at 1 year remained complete at 5 years postinjury, with 3.5% improving to AIS grade B, and up to 1.05% each improving to AIS grades C and D. There was a statistically significant change noted for MIS. There were no significant changes for the motor level and NLI over 4 years; however, approximately 20% of subjects improved their motor level and NLI. People with complete and incomplete injuries had similar improvements in motor level, but subjects with an incomplete injury had a greater chance of improvement in NLI and MIS. CONCLUSIONS: There was a small degree of neurologic recovery (between 1 and 5 y postinjury) after a traumatic SCI. Late conversion, between 1 and 5 years, from a neurologically complete to an incomplete injury occurred in 5.6% of cases, but in only up to 2.1% was there a conversion from motor complete to motor incomplete status. Limitations of this study included changes in the ASIA classification during the study and in the intra- and interrater reliability typically seen in longitudinal studies of the ASIA standards. Functional changes were not studied. Knowledge of the degree of late recovery may help in analyzing newer interventions to enhance recovery.     

Gender-related differences in acute rehabilitation lengths of stay, charges, and functional outcomes for a matched sample with spinal cord injury: a multicenter investigation

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of gender on length of stay (LOS), treatment costs, and outcomes by using a matched sample of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: A 2 x (15 x 3) mixed, block design was used retrospectively to analyze the impact of gender on subjects matched for age, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor impairment classification, and level of neurologic injury. SETTING: Twenty medical centers in the federally sponsored Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems project. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand seventy-four adult patients with SCI admitted between 1988 and 1998 were assessed at acute-care admission, inpatient rehabilitation admission, and inpatient rehabilitation discharge. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ASIA motor index and FIM instrument admission, discharge, and efficiency scores; rehabilitation LOS and medical care charges; and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Analysis revealed no gender-related differences in FIM motor scores on admission and discharge. No differences in FIM motor efficiencies or daily change were observed. No significant differences were found for ASIA motor scores on acute-care admission and rehabilitation discharge. No differences in acute rehabilitation LOS and charges were observed. No gender-related differences were seen in the likelihood of discharge to an institutional setting. CONCLUSION: Gender was not a significant factor in functional outcome of SCI patients after acute rehabilitation.     

Neoplastic versus traumatic spinal cord injury: an outcome comparison after inpatient rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression (SCC) to outcomes of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) after inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: A comparison between patients with a diagnosis of neoplastic SCC admitted to an SCI rehabilitation unit and patients with a diagnosis of traumatic SCI admitted to the regional Model Spinal Cord Injury Centers over a 5-year period, controlling for age, neurologic level of injury, and American Spinal Injury Association impairment classification. SETTING: Tertiary university medical centers. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients with neoplastic SCC and 29 patients with SCI of traumatic etiology who met standard rehabilitation admission criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Acute and rehabilitation hospital length of stay (LOS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, FIM change, FIM efficiency, and discharge rates to home. RESULTS: Patients with neoplastic SCC had a significantly (p < .01) shorter rehabilitation LOS than those with traumatic SCI (25.17 vs 57.46 days). No statistical significance was found in acute care LOS. Motor FIM scores on admission were higher in the neoplastic group, but discharge FIM scores and FIM change were significantly lower. Both groups had similar FIM efficiencies and community discharges. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with neoplastic SCC can achieve rates of functional gain comparable to those of their counterparts with traumatic SCI. While patients with traumatic SCI achieve greater functional improvement, patients with neoplastic SCC have a shorter rehabilitation LOS and can achieve comparable success with discharge to the community.     

Metric properties of the ASIA motor score: subscales improve correlation with functional activities

OBJECTIVE: To apply item response theory (IRT) methods to neurologic and functional scales to determine the value of using American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor subscores and ability estimates, rather than total ASIA motor scores, to predict motor FIM instrument scores. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING: Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems centers. PARTICIPANTS: People with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) (N=4338) discharged from inpatient rehabilitation between January 1, 1994, and March 31, 2003. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total discharge motor FIM scores, FIM subscale scores, and IRT-derived ability estimates of motor FIM scores. RESULTS: Use of separate ASIA upper-extremity and lower-extremity motor scores improved prediction of motor FIM scores over that of total ASIA motor score (R(2) for motor FIM score, .71 vs .59). Use of IRT-based ability estimates derived by applying a 2-parameter graded response model to the raw scores, however, did not improve prediction of motor FIM scores above that of the ASIA motor subscale scores. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with the metric properties of the ASIA motor score, and with recent models of disablement, impairment in SCI is more accurately characterized by using separate ASIA upper- and lower-extremity motor scores than by using a single motor score. Use of subscores for impairment should improve prediction of functional abilities and enhance more complex models of disability.     

Aging with spinal cord injury: changes in selected health indices and life satisfaction

OBJECTIVES: To document the impact of age, age at injury, years postinjury, and injury severity on changes over time in selected physical and psychosocial outcomes of people aging with spinal cord injury (SCI), and to identify the best predictors of these outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional and longitudinal examination of people with SCI. SETTING: Follow-up of people who received initial rehabilitation in a regional Model Spinal Cord Injury System. PARTICIPANTS: People who meet the inclusion criteria for the National Spinal Cord Injury Database were studied at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 years postinjury. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of pressure ulcers, number of times rehospitalized, number of days rehospitalized, perceived health status, satisfaction with life, and pain during the most recent follow-up year. RESULTS: The number of days rehospitalized and frequency of rehospitalizations decreased and the number of pressure ulcers increased as time passed. For the variables of pressure ulcers, poor perceived health, the perception of pain and lower life satisfaction, the best predictor of each outcome was the previous existence or poor rating of that same outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Common complications of SCI often herald the recurrence of those same complications at a later point in time, highlighting the importance of early intervention to prevent future health and psychosocial difficulties.     

Poster 17: Is length of stay associated with spinal cord injury functional outcome at discharge from acute rehabilitation?

Objective: To determine whether rehabilitation length of stay (LOS) is associated with discharge motor function for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Longitudinal. Setting: Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems center. Participants: 920 persons with traumatic, complete SCI enrolled in the Spinal Cord Injury National Database, with levels of injury (LOI) at C5, C6, C7, and T1-5; and inpatient rehabilitation discharge dates between 1989 and 1992 (“early”) and 1999 and 2002 (“late”). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: FIM™ instrument at rehabilitation discharge. Results: For all LOI groups, the late group had a LOS shorter than the early group, with the largest difference in the C7 group: 107 days (early) versus 59 days (late). FIM motor scores at rehabilitation discharge also differed significantly for the C5, C7, and T1-5 LOI groups. For each of these LOIs, the late group was discharged with lower FIM motor scores; the largest difference was again noted for the C7 group, which had FIM motor scores of 51.9 (early) versus 40.7 (late). Conclusions: Decreased inpatient rehabilitation LOS was associated with decreased function at rehabilitation discharge. Persons with C7-level SCI were the most affected group; this group had the largest decrease in LOS and motor FIM score.     

Research from the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems: findings from the current 5-year grant cycle

This issue of the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation is dedicated to current research findings of the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS) program. The MSCIS grants were established by the Rehabilitation Services Administration in the 1970s. Now administered by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research within the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services in the US Department of Education, the program has included 27 spinal cord injury centers in the United States over the years. In the current 5-year grant cycle (2000-2005), there are 16 designated regional MSCIS centers. In addition to establishing a comprehensive system of care, the grantees contribute patient data to the National Spinal Cord Injury Database (which now contains data on 30,532 subjects with follow-up of up to 30 y). In addition, the MSCIS grants enable the conduct of site-specific and collaborative research projects. To highlight the research findings of the program, the MSCIS have produced a special dissemination effort during each of the previous 5 grant cycles, with this issue of the Archives representing the latest of these endeavors. This article provides a brief history of the MSCIS program and highlights the important findings of the 17 original research articles contained in this issue.     

Gender and minority differences in the pain experience of people with spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES: To examine gender and minority differences in the prevalence and severity of pain in people with traumatic-onset spinal cord injury (SCI) during follow-up, and to determine the relation of those differences to demographic characteristics, etiology of injury, and level and extent of the lesion. DESIGN: Survey and analysis of cross-sectional data using case-control methodology and multiple regression methods. SETTING: Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7379 individuals with traumatic-onset SCI from 16 MSCIS entered in the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center database between 1998 and 2002. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence and severity of pain as reported in follow-up surveys. RESULTS: Pain prevalence remained fairly stable over time, ranging from 81% at 1 year postinjury to 82.7% at 25 years. Pain was no more common in women than in men, nor did pain severity scores differ significantly. However, pain prevalence was significantly lower among nonwhites, although they tended to report a higher average pain severity score when pain was present. Also, people with SCI who were employed when injured, who had more than a high school education, and who were not tetraplegic reported a higher prevalence of pain. Pain interfered with work more often for women and nonwhites during some, but not all, follow-up years, and for those who were not employed at the time of interview, for those whose SCI was caused by violence, for those with paraplegia, and for those with incomplete SCI. CONCLUSIONS: Pain is a common and significant problem for the majority of people with SCI. It may interfere less frequently with work over time, which suggests that an adaptive process may be occurring. Gender differences in the pain experience did not emerge, but nonwhites tended to have a lower prevalence of pain. If pain was present, nonwhites tended to report more severe pain than did whites. Further research is needed to delineate the possible psychosocial and biomedical causes of these findings.     

脊髓损伤患者盆底表面肌电与肠功能的相关性研究

目的探讨脊髓损伤(SCI)患者盆底表面肌电(sEMG)值与国际SCI 数据集肠功能基础数据集问卷调查指标的相关性,为SCI 患者水疗项目的选择提供依据。方法根据美国脊柱损伤协会(ASIA)2006 年颁发的SCI 神经学分类国际标准,将180 例残损分级为A级、B级、C级和D级的SCI 受试者分别分成A组、B组、C组和D组。应用标准的Glazer 盆底sEMG评估方案及设备,对患者进行肛门括约肌sEMG值的测定,同时进行国际SCI 数据集肠功能基础数据集——数据表的问卷调查。结果Glazer 评估中各个收缩阶段的盆底sEMG检测值与SCI 肠功能问卷调查中的便意、主要排便方法、平均排便时间、便失禁的次数、需要外用衬垫或塞子5 项指标之间存在相关性(P<0.05),各个收缩阶段的盆底sEMG 检测值也与SCI 残损分级之间存在相关性(P<0.01)。结论Glazer 盆底sEMG评估与国际SCI 数据集肠功能基础数据集的问卷调查对SCI 患者水疗项目的选择具有一定的参考意义。     

A multicenter investigation of age-related differences in lengths of stay, hospitalization charges, and outcomes for a matched tetraplegia sample.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of age at injury on lengths of stay, treatment costs, and outcomes using a matched sample of tetraplegic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. DESIGN: Differences were examined by separating the sample into three age categories (18 to 34, 35 to 64, and 65+ years old) matched for American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Motor Impairment Classification and level of neurologic preservation bilaterally. Analysis of variance was used to examine age group differences for lengths of stay, medical expenses, and functional outcome. SETTING: Sixteen medical centers in the federally sponsored Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Project. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy-five adult patients with tetraplegic SCI admitted between 1988 and 1996 were assessed at acute care admission, inpatient rehabilitation admission, and inpatient rehabilitation discharge. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ASIA Motor Index and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) admission, discharge, and efficiency scores; acute care and rehabilitation lengths of stay and medical care charges; and discharge disposition. RESULTS: Analyses revealed equivalent lengths of stay and charges for all age groups. There were no age-related differences in ASIA and FIM Motor scores at acute care and inpatient rehabilitation admission. Younger patients' scores on the FIM Motor subscale improved significantly more than did middle and older patients'. The two younger groups of patients had a more significant improvement than did older patients, as indicated by ASIA Motor Index scores. When taking lengths of stay into account, the FIM motor scores of the youngest group of patients improved more quickly than those of the two older groups. Furthermore, the younger and middle age groups demonstrated greater treatment efficiency than the older patient group based on ASIA Motor Index score ratios. Younger patients were least likely to be discharged to institutional settings. CONCLUSIONS: Along with neurologic and functional status, age should be considered when formulating treatment plans and prognostic statements. For older patients, alternative rehabilitation settings with lower-intensity treatment and lower charges may prove to be a more efficacious use of resources.     

Early rehabilitation effect for traumatic spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To determine the natural course of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) and the effect of early rehabilitation on it. DESIGN: A retrospective, multicenter study. SETTING: Sixteen Rosai hospitals and 1 medical school. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-three SCI patients (104 men, 19 women; mean age, 48.8 +/- 17.7yr) enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Dividing the subjects into an early rehabilitation group and a delayed group; differences were ensured by international classification of SCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classifications, the motor recovery rate (MRR) was defined as (ASIA motor score at discharge - ASIA motor score at admission)/(100 - ASIA motor score at admission). The regression lines for FIM instrument score and ASIA motor score were determined for 6 subgroups (early or delayed tetraplegia, central cord injury, paraplegia) by the MRR staging. The regression lines for physical or cognitive FIM score and ASIA motor score were also determined for 6 subgroups. RESULTS: Three stages were obtained: acute stage: 2 weeks postinjury; recovery stage: 2 weeks to 6 months postinjury; and chronic stage: more than 6 months postinjury. Regression lines showed that rehabilitation improved physical functional independence for ASIA motor score, especially in the early rehabilitation subgroups. There was no correlation between cognitive FIM score and ASIA motor score in 6 subgroups. CONCLUSION: Early SCI rehabilitation contributes to good physical activities of daily living for motor function.     

A demographic profile of new traumatic spinal cord injuries: change and stability over 30 years

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate epidemiologic trends in new spinal cord injuries (SCIs) in the United States over 3 decades. DESIGN: Consecutive case series. SETTING: Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems (MSCIS) facilities. Participants: Persons (N=30,532) admitted to MSCIS facilities within 365 days of injury between 1973 and 2003, and enrolled in the National Spinal Cord Injury Database. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data were collected at MSCIS admission and rehabilitation discharge. Variables included age, gender, race and ethnic group, year of injury, and level and extent of injury. Specific etiologies were grouped as motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), violence, falls, sports, and other. Demographic and injury severity trends were analyzed by year of injury groupings according to decades (1973-1979, 1980-1989, 1990-1999, 2000-2003.) Chi-square tests assessed statistical significance. One-way analysis of variance compared mean ages. RESULTS: The male/female ratio remained fairly stable at 4:1, but the percentage of women increased slightly over time, especially from MVC etiologies ( P <.001). Over time, the mean age at injury increased significantly ( P <.001); it was 37.7+/-17.5 years in 2000-2003. The majority of cases were white (66.1%). Tetraplegia (54.1%) and complete injuries (55.6%) occurred more than paraplegia and incomplete injuries, respectively. MVCs (45.6%) remained the most common etiology; falls (19.6%) held the second position over violence (17.8%), except for the 1990-1999 period when the positions were reversed. Significantly increasing percentages of new injuries were seen for SCI due to automobile, motorcycle, bicycle, and all-terrain vehicle crashes, blunt object attacks, snow skiing, and medical and surgical mishaps. CONCLUSIONS: Many previously seen SCI demographic trends continued into the 2000 decade.     

Predictors of personal care assistance for people with spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictors of personal care assistance (PCA) use in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Follow-up of individuals crossing their 1st, 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, or 25th anniversary of injury who underwent their initial rehabilitation at a Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2154 participants (2547 records) who met the inclusion criteria for the National Spinal Cord Injury Database and had valid values for the main outcome measures. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Daily hours of paid, unpaid, and occasional PCA services. RESULTS: Differences in an interval version of the motor portion of the FIM trade mark instrument accounted for 26.3% of the variance in total PCA hours, Model Systems differences accounted for 9.3%, and no other predictor accounted for more than 2.1% of the variance. CONCLUSION: Activities of daily living functioning, as measured by the motor portion of the FIM, was the strongest predictor of PCA use among people with SCI.     

Pressure ulcer prevalence in people with spinal cord injury: age-period-duration effects

OBJECTIVE: To examine age-period-duration patterns of the prevalence of pressure ulcers in community-residing people with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Nine Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: People with SCI (N=3361) injured between 1986 and 1995 and followed up thereafter on a yearly basis through 2002. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Physician-confirmed pressure ulcers of stage II or greater at the follow-up visits. RESULTS: The multivariable generalized estimating equations model showed a significant trend toward increasing pressure ulcer prevalence in the recent years (1994-2002 vs 1984-1993: odds ratio=1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.6) not explained by aging, years since injury, or demographic and clinical factors. The risk of pressure ulcers appeared to be steady during the first 10 years and increased 15 years postinjury. Pressure ulcers were more common among the elderly, men, African Americans, singles, subjects with education less than high school, unemployed, subjects with complete injury, and subjects with history of pressure ulcers, rehospitalization, nursing home stay, and other medical conditions. Injury cause and level had no significant effect. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the need for research into factors that contribute to the increasing pressure ulcer prevalence.     

Testosterone replacement therapy and motor function in men with spinal cord injury: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate motor function in men with spinal cord injury (SCI) given testosterone replacement therapy (TRT). DESIGN: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) rehabilitation discharge motor index scores were compared between men with SCI given TRT (testosterone cypionate, 200 mg, monthly; n = 50) and a comparison group (n = 480) in a retrospective study. Covariates included admission motor and FIM scores, level of injury (paraplegia/tetraplegia), days since injury, and age. RESULTS: ASIA discharge motor scores for ASIA impairment scale grades C and D were significantly different (P < 0.05) in men with incomplete SCI given TRT, relative to the comparison group. The covariate-adjusted mean discharge score for the TRT group was higher than for the comparison group. There were no significant differences in discharge FIM scores (P = 0.34) for men with incomplete injuries and no differences in the adjusted discharge ASIA motor scores (P = 0.92) or adjusted discharge FIM scores (P = 0.16) for men with complete injuries. CONCLUSION: The data support a relationship between TRT and strength gains in men with residual motor function after SCI. Prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings.     

脊髓损伤患者躯体功能恢复与心理护理的相关性研究

目的应用功能独立性评价量表(Functionalindependentmeasures,FIM)评估住院脊髓损伤(SCI)患者躯体功能恢复情况,同时进一步分析SCI患者躯体功能恢复与心理、直接护理的相关性。方法将39例SCI患者随机分成实验组18例和对照组21例,两组患者均进行常规的康复训练及康复护理,实验组另予以心理护理。并在入院时、出院时以及随访时对两组患者进行FIM评分,同时记录护理接触时间。结果实验组FIM评分较对照组有显著性差异(P<0.05),且入院时FIM评分与心理、直接护理所需时间呈显著负相关;出院时FIM评分与心理护理所需时间呈显著负相关,与给药、提供治疗等直接护理所需时间无显著负相关;随访时FIM评分与心理、直接护理所需时间均不存在显著相关。结论通过FIM评分可以预测护理工作需要量,躯体功能恢复和护理时间的关系不是线性关系,做好患者的心理疏导对提高康复治疗疗效,改善患者的生存质量有着积极的意义。