Phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in metastatic breast cancer

Our objectives were to assess the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients with stage IV MBC and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease were treated with gemcitabine 1200 mg/m on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m on day 1 every 21 days. Up to 6 cycles were given. A total of 46 patients with a median age of 49 years (range 24-77) and Karnofsky performance status of 80 or above were enrolled. In total, 238 cycles were administered. Of the 42 patients evaluable for response, seven (17%) achieved a complete response and 27 (64%) a partial response, for an overall response rate of 81% [95% confidence interval (CI) 69-93%]. Median time to progression was 14.9 months (95% CI 0-30.2 months). Median duration of response was 24.2 months (95% CI 11.2-37.3 months). The median survival was 27.9 months (95% CI 23.1-32.7 months), and the 1- and 2-year survival probabilities were 71.4 and 61.4%, respectively. All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and grade 3/4 WHO toxicities included neutropenia (41.3%), anemia (8.7%), thrombocytopenia (8.7%), alopecia (26.1%) and nausea/vomiting (32.6%). We conclude that gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a highly effective and safe first-line treatment for patients with MBC. The time to progression of 14.9 months compares favorably with other standard treatments (anthracyclines, taxanes). A randomized study is required to further investigate the role of this combination as first-line treatment for MBC.     

Biweekly docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the Galician Lung Cancer Group (GGCP 006-00)

This phase II trial assessed the antitumoral activity and toxicity of docetaxel 50 mg/m (1-h i.v. infusion) administered every 2 weeks as second-line treatment in 45 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A total of 251 infusions (median 4 per patient) were administered. The actual and relative median dose intensity values were 24.2 mg/m/week and 0.97, respectively. Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for tumor response. The overall response rate was 20% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8-32%] and included one complete response (2%) and eight partial responses (18%). Stable disease was found in seven patients (16%). With a median follow-up of 4 months, the median time to disease progression was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.9-3.7), the median overall survival was 4.0 months (95% CI 3.4-4.6) and the 1-year survival rate was 23% (95% CI 9-37). The every-2-weeks docetaxel schedule was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities showed rates of 5% or less of patients and 2% or less of cycles. The main grade 3/4 hematological toxicity was neutropenia (16% of patients and 8% of cycles). No febrile neutropenia was found. Nevertheless, one toxic death was reported. We conclude that the biweekly docetaxel schedule showed an antitumoral activity similar to that found with the every-3-weeks or weekly docetaxel schedule in a second-line setting for advanced NSCLC. This antitumoral effect was associated with a marked reduction in hematological toxicity, therefore suggesting that this new docetaxel schedule might be useful in the design of combined second-line schedules for treating NSCLC.     

Docetaxel plus fractionated cisplatin is a safe and active schedule as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Results of a phase II study

This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) (day 1) and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (administered as 40 mg/m(2) doses each on days 1 and 2) every 3 weeks as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty-two NSCLC patients were enrolled, most of them with stage IV disease (74%). A total of 195 chemotherapy cycles were administered (median 6, range 1-6). All patients were considered evaluable for efficacy and toxicity in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. The overall response rate was 48% (95% CI, 33-64), including one CR (3%) and 19 PRs (45%). Stable disease was found in 6 patients (14%). The median time to disease progression was 4.9 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.7) and the median overall survival was 10.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-16.0). The survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 36.0% (95% CI, 19.9-52.0) and 18.0% (95% CI, 3.9-32.1), respectively. Overall, the combination showed an excellent safety profile. Severe hematological toxicities were uncommon: neutropenia (5% of patients, 1% of cycles) and febrile neutropenia (2% of patients, 0.5% of cycles). Asthenia (12%) was the only grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity that affected more than 10% of patients. There were no toxic deaths. In conclusion, docetaxel plus fractionated cisplatin as first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC patients showed similar efficacy as the same combination with higher doses of docetaxel but where cisplatin was administered in a single dose. This new schedule shows promise in its excellent hematological and non-hematological toxicity profile. A randomized phase III trial is needed to confirm these results.     

Phase I/II trial of gemcitabine plus docetaxel in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

INTRODUCTION: The poor prognosis of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as well as the significant toxicity from many conventional cytotoxic regimens warrants the investigation of combinations of new active agents for treatment. This is a phase I-II (dose-finding, efficacy, and toxicity) study of docetaxel + gemcitabine in patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC without prior systemic therapy. Patients were treated in cohorts of 3 with alternating increasing doses of docetaxel and gemcitabine at each level. Patients: Fifty patients were entered, of which 49 were eligible including 28 males and 21 females; 15 stage IIIB and 34 stage IV; median age 57 yrs (35-74). RESULTS: The Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) was docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) day 1 and gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) d1 & 8, every 21 days. The overall response rate is 20%. Eight patients are not formally assessable for response due to early discontinuation or loss to follow-up and are considered to have progressive disease. The median time to progression (TTP) is 3.5 months (1-25), with 11 pts with at least 7 months TTP. There were 10 pts (20%) with a partial response (PR); 18 (37%) maintained stable disease; 21 (43%) had progressive disease (PD) or were not assessable. Toxicity: Forty-nine patients are evaluable for assessment for toxicity: Grade (Gr) 3/4 toxicity was documented thus: 14 with neutropenia, 1 with anemia, 1 with nausea, 2 liver function, 2 dyspnea, 2 fatigue, 1 allergy, 1 neurologic. CONCLUSION: This regimen is well tolerated and results in phase I-II testing in this patient population warrant further consideration of the study of docetaxel + gemcitabine for advanced NSCLC.     

Weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil as 24-h infusion and folinic acid (AIO) plus irinotecan as second- and third-line treatment in patients with colorectal cancer pre-treated with AIO plus oxaliplatin

Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as a 24-h infusion and folinic acid (FA) (AIO regimen) plus irinotecan (CPT-11) after pre-treatment with AIO plus oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Twenty-six patients with non-resectable distant CRC metastases were analyzed for second- or third-line treatment with AIO plus CPT-11 after pre-treatment with AIO plus L-OHP. On an outpatient basis, the patients received a treatment regimen comprising weekly 80 mg/m2 CPT-11 in the form of a 1-h i.v. infusion and 500 mg/m2 FA as a 1- to 2-h i.v. infusion, followed by 2000 mg/m2 5-FU i.v. administered as a 24-h infusion once weekly. A single treatment cycle comprised six weekly infusions followed by 2 weeks of rest. A total of 26 patients received 344 chemotherapy applications with AIO plus CPT-11. The main symptom of toxicity was diarrhea (NCI-CTC toxicity grade 3+4) occurring in five patients (19%; 95% CI 7-39%). Nausea and vomiting presented in two patients (8%; 95% CI 1-25%). The response rate of 26 patients can be summarized as follows: partial remission: n=7 (27%; 95% CI 12-48%); stable disease: n=9 (35%; 95% CI 17-56%) and progressive disease: n=10 (38%; 95% CI 20-59%). The median progression-free survival (n=26) was 5.8 months (range 3-13), the median survival time counted from the treatment start with the AIO plus CPT-11 regimen was 10 months (range 2-24) and counted from the start of first-line treatment (n=26) was 23 months (range 10-66). We conclude that the AIO regimen plus CPT-11 is practicable in an outpatient setting and well tolerated by the patients. Tumor control was achieved in 62% of the patients. The median survival time was 10 months and the median survival time from the start of first-line treatment (n=26) was 23 months.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in chemonaive patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

This phase II study evaluated the activity of gemcitabine (Gemzar) plus cisplatin (Platinol) as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Forty-two chemonaive patients with advanced (stage III and IV) epithelial ovarian cancer received gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 3 weeks, up to eight cycles. The median number of cycles completed was 5 (range 2-8). Of the 41 patients evaluable for tumor response, 20 had a partial response and nine had a complete response, for an overall clinical and pathologic response rate of 70.7% (95% CI 56.8-84.6%). Median overall survival for all 42 patients was 23.4 months (95% CI 15.9-29.9 months) and the median progression-free survival time was 10.4 months (95% CI 9.4-13.5 months). The combination was generally manageable. Hematologic toxicity (grade 3/4 neutropenia: 31.0/21.4%; grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia: 9.5/4.8%; grade 3/4 anemia: 11.9/0%) and nausea and vomiting (grade 3/4: 35.7/31.0%) were the most common toxicities. There was one toxic death (septic shock due to hematologic toxicity-induced infection). We conclude that gemcitabine plus cisplatin is active and feasible as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Further clinical trials with the addition of gemcitabine to first-line treatment appear warranted.     

Weekly Gemcitabine for the Treatment of Biliary Tract and Gallbladder Cancer

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly administration of gemcitabine treatment in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced biliary tract and gallbladder cancer. Patients and methods: Gemcitabine at a dose of 800?mg/m² was administered weekly as a 30-min infusion to patients with previously operated, histologically confirmed, metastatic, or unresectable locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Results: A total of 30 patients (median age 66 years; range 54–72 years) were included in the study. A median of 14 (range, 4–33) weekly doses was administered. Out of 30 patients evaluable for response, nine partial responses were observed (30.0%), while a further 11 patients demonstrated stable disease (36.7%). The median time to disease progression was 7 months (range, 5–34). Overall response rate was superior in patients with cancer of the gallbladder (ORR=35.7%) compared with those patients with biliary duct cancer (ORR=27.3%). This correlated to a significantly longer time to progression of 6.4 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.6–7.1 months) versus 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.9–4.3 months; p=0.03) and a significantly better overall survival of 17.1 months (95% CI, 15.8–18.5 months) versus 11.4 months (95% CI, 10.2–12.6 months, p=0.021). Toxicities were generally mild with only one case of grade 3 neutropenia. There were no cases of febrile neutropenia and no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: Weekly administration of gemcitabine provides a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for chemotherapy naïve patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma, particularly with a gallbladder origin.     

Randomized clinical trial of adenosine 5'-triphosphate on tumor growth and survival in advanced lung cancer patients

We recently reported that regular infusions of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) inhibited loss of body weight and quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the present paper we investigated whether ATP affects tumor growth and survival in the same group of patients. Fifty-eight NSCLC patients (stage IIIB or IV) were randomly assigned to receive either 10 i.v. 30-h ATP infusions every 2-4 weeks over a 24-week period (n = 28) or no ATP (control patients, n = 30). ATP was given for a median of 6.5 infusions. Differences in time to progression and survival between patients in both groups were tested by means of the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. Forty-nine patients were evaluable for tumor response. None of the evaluable patients showed a complete or partial response. Median time to progression was 3.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.3-5.5] in the ATP group compared to 3.0 months (95% CI = 2.4-3.7) in the control group (p = 0.71). Median survival was 5.6 months (95% CI = 1.1-10.1) for the ATP group and 4.7 months (95% CI = 2.6-6.8) for the control group (p = 0.68). ATP treatment was associated with a significant increase in survival in the subgroup of weight-losing patients with stage IIIB NSCLC: in this subgroup, median survival was 9.3 months (95% CI = 2.1-16.5) for ATP-treated patients versus 3.5 months (95% CI = 2.3-4.7) for control patients (between-group difference: p = 0.009). No significant effect of ATP was observed for weight-losing patients with stage IV NSCLC or for weight-stable NSCLC patients. Although ATP as a single therapy does not lead to tumor regression or increased survival in patients with advanced lung cancer, it may prolong survival in weight-losing patients with stage IIIB lung cancer. The latter finding is intriguing, but requires confirmation in larger clinical trials.     

Phase II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered every 2 weeks as treatment for patients with colorectal cancer resistant to previous treatment with 5-fluorouracil-based therapies: comparison of two different dose schedules (250 and 200 mg/m2) according to toxicity prognostic factors

Our objective was to assess the antitumoral activity and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) 60-min i.v. infusion every 2 weeks as second-line monotherapy of advanced colorectal cancer. Two doses were studied (250 and 200 mg/m) according to the risk of developing toxicity. Two groups of patients were studied: high-risk group (HR, 200 mg/m, n = 45; Karnofsky score 60-80% and/or the record of prior pelvic irradiation) and low-risk-group (LR, 250 mg/m, n = 51; Karnofsky score >80% and without prior pelvic irradiation). The mean number of cycles per patient was 7: 6.6 (HR group) and 8.3 (LR group). Median RDI was 0.96. The overall response rate was 8.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-21.2%; HR group] and 15.7% (95% CI 7.0-28.5%; LR group), respectively. The LR group showed two complete responses and a higher percentage of stable disease (56.9 versus 33.3% in HR group). The median survival was 7.1 months (95% CI 5.2-8.9 months, HR group) and 11.7 months (95% CI 8.4-15.1 months, LR group). The median time to disease progression was 3.2 months (95% CI 1.0-5.4 months, HR group) and 5.3 months (95% CI 3.8-6.7 months, LR group). Both CPT-11 treatments were well tolerated. Grade 3/4 toxicity incidence was low, e.g. granulocytopenia (7% of patients in HR group and 9% in LR group) and delayed diarrhea (18% of patients in HR group and 14% in LR group). We conclude that the treatment of patients with the adjusted dose of CPT-11 according to prognostic factors for toxicity resulted in the improved toxicity profile, but showed poorer efficacy outcome. Therefore, the dose reduction in patients with low performance and treated with radiotherapy needs further investigation to provide some new insights on the benefit:risk ratio of such treatment.     

Phase II trial of docetaxel with dexamethasone premedication in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the Canadian experience

We performed a Phase II trial to evaluate the activity and tolerability of docetaxel as a single agent in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty-four patients with metastatic and/or locally advanced NSCLC received i.v. docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for a median of 4 (range 1-11) cycles. All patients received premedication with oral dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily for 5 days starting the day before chemotherapy. Seven partial responses were observed among 35 evaluable patients, and the overall response rate was 20% (95% CI 8-37). The median response duration was 5 months, median survival time was 10 months and the estimated 1-year survival rate was 42%. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 10 patients (23%); neutropenic infection occurred in 4 patients, and led to 2 toxic deaths (both patients had borderline exclusion criteria). The corticosteroid premedication effectively reduced the overall incidence (34%) and severity (4% severe) of fluid retention, and delayed the median time to onset from cycle 4 to cycle 7. This study shows the promising efficacy of docetaxel as monotherapy in advanced NSCLC, and combination chemotherapy regimens incorporating docetaxel are now being evaluated in this clinical setting.     

Phase II trial of docetaxel with dexamethasone premedication in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the Canadian experience

We performed a Phase II trial to evaluate the activity and tolerability of docetaxel as a single agent in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Forty-four patients with metastatic and/or locally advanced NSCLC received i.v. docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for a median of 4 (range 1–11) cycles. All patients received premedication with oral dexamethasone 8 mg twice daily for 5 days starting the day before chemotherapy. Seven partial responses were observed among 35 evaluable patients, and the overall response rate was 20% (95% CI 8-37). The median response duration was 5 months, median survival time was 10 months and the estimated 1-year survival rate was 42%. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 10 patients (23%); neutropenic infection occurred in 4 patients, and led to 2 toxic deaths (both patients had borderline exclusion criteria). The corticosteroid premedication effectively reduced the overall incidence (34%) and severity (4% severe) of fluid retention, and delayed the median time to onset from cycle 4 to cycle 7. This study shows the promising efficacy of docetaxel as monotherapy in advanced NSCLC, and combination chemotherapy regimens incorporating docetaxel are now being evaluated in this clinical setting.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in stage IIIA/B non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose. We studied cisplatin plusgemcitabine as induction (neoadjuvant)therapy in patients with stage IIInon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) toassess its objective remission rate,resectability, survival, and toxicity. Patients and methods. Patients with stageIII NSCLC received 2 cycles of gemcitabine1250 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15,plus cisplatin 100 mg/m² on day 2.Subsequently, patients were assigned tolocal therapy – surgery or radiotherapy. Results. Twenty-nine eligiblepatients (male/female: 21/8) with a medianage of 59 years (range, 43–71 years) wereenrolled between October 1996 and February1999. A total of 80 cycles were given,with a median of 3 per patient (range, 1–4cycles). Overall, toxicities were mild;only one patient had febrile neutropenia,and there were no grade 4 non-hematologicaltoxicities. There was one toxic deathfollowing afebrile grade 4 neutropenia.Overall clinical response rate (2 completeresponses [CRs] + 16 partial responses[PRs]) was 62% (95% CI, 45%–79%);10 patients had stable disease and noneprogressed; one patient was not evaluable.Eight of the 18 operated patients hadpathological response: 1 CR and 7downstagings to N(–); 14 patients wereresected. Median survival was 17 months(95% CI, 13–21 months), with 1-year and2-year actuarial survival rates of 61%and 29%, respectively. Conclusions. Gemcitabine pluscisplatin is a very active andwell-tolerated induction regimen in stageIII NSCLC. Comparative studies with otherstandard regimens are warranted.     

Adding weekly irinotecan to high-dose 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (HD-5-FU/FA) after failure for first-line HD-5-FU/FA in advanced colorectal cancer--a phase II study

Irinotecan (CPT-11) has been shown to prolong survival and improve quality of life in comparison to best supportive care in colorectal cancer patients with pretreatment of bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). After first-line 24-h high-dose (HD) 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) an objective response rate of 11% with 3-weekly CPT-11 350 mg/m was reported. In the present study we investigated weekly CPT-11 in combination with 24-h HD-5-FU/FA as second-line treatment after prior exposure to 24-h HD-5-FU. Synergy between 5-FU and CPT-11 is the rationale to combine both substances for second-line therapy in order to overcome resistance to 5-FU. Thirty-five patients were recruited in a single institution to receive 6 x weekly CPT-11 80 mg/m(2), FA 200 mg/m(2) and 24-h HD-5-FU 2000 mg/m(2). Treatment was repeated on day 57. Patient characteristics: M/F=20/15, median WHO performance status 1, range (0-2). Thirty-four patients were evaluable for response: partial response 17% and no change 40%. Median time to progression and overall survival were 3.3 and 8.4 months, respectively. All patients were evaluable for toxicity analysis (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3): leukocytopenia 3%, diarrhea 12% and vomiting/nausea 6%. Of the assigned doses, a median 100% of 5-FU and 92% of CPT-11 were administered during the first cycle of chemotherapy. We conclude that weekly CPT-11 and HD-5-FU/FA is an active and safe combination chemotherapy resulting in response rates in the upper range of other CPT-11-based second-line regimen. The toxicity profile in our series compared to 3-weekly CPT-11 seems favorable.     

Treatment of AIDS Related Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma with Combination Mitoguazone Dihydrochloride and Low Dose Chop Chemotherapy: Results of a Phase II study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response and side effects of combination therapy with low dose CHOP chemotherapy and mitoguazone dihydrochloride in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS-NHL). METHODS: Eighteen patients newly diagnosed with intermediate or high-grade AIDS-NHL were treated with low dose CHOP as follows: day 1, cyclophosphamide 350 mg/m(2), intravenously (IV); doxorubicin 25mg/m(2) IV; vincristine 2mg IV; and prednisone 100mg given orally on days 1 through 5. In addition, mitoguazone dihydrochloride was given at a dose of 600 mg/m(2) IV on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle. RESULTS: Seventeen males and one female patient were accrued. Twelve patients had high-grade pathologies while the remainder had an intermediate grade pathology (diffuse large cell). The median CD4+ lymphocyte count was 98/dl (range 1-924). Three patients (17%) reported an AIDS-defining illness prior to lymphoma diagnosis. Of 14 evaluable patients, 6 (43%) achieved a complete remission and 5 (35%) a partial remission. The median failure free and overall survival times were 6.5 and 8.4 months, respectively. Major toxicity was hematologic with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 72%; two patients died of neutropenic sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Mitoguazone in combination with low dose CHOP is a safe regimen, associated with a response rate of 79% (CR 43%, PR 36%, 95% CI=49-95%). These preliminary results suggest no major improvement in terms of response over use of CHOP without mitoguazone.     

Phase II study of docetaxel alternating with cisplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The objective of this study was to evaluate a regimen of full doses of docetaxel and cisplatin, using an alternating schedule, as first-line therapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The standard concomitant schedule does not allow full doses of both drugs to be administered. We wanted to see if there was an advantage to be gained by administering full doses of both docetaxel and cisplatin, using a different schedule. Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was given once every 6 weeks from week 1 and cisplatin (120 mg/m2 for two doses and 100 mg/m2 thereafter) once every 6 weeks from week 4, for six cycles (three docetaxel and three cisplatin). Thirty-six of the 44 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy. Forty-eight percent of the patients had good (KPS 90-100%) performance status. A median of five cycles was administered, for which no dose reductions were necessary. There were 13 of 36 partial responses (36%; 95% CI 21-54%) and 15 of 36 patients achieved stable disease (42%). The median duration of response was 10.5 months, the median time to progression was 4.5 months and the median survival was 9 months. The 1 and 2 year survival rates were 39 and 16%, respectively. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were nausea (23% of patients), vomiting (18%) and neutropenia (77%). Infections were also common, but not severe. The alternating schedule produced response, toxicity and survival figures that compared favorable with those using the concomitant schedule. This study could serve as a model for future studies of non-cisplatin-containing regimens, in which full doses of docetaxel could alternate with full doses of other new agents active against NSCLC.     

吉西他滨联合卡铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察

目的观察吉西他滨联合卡铂在晚期非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）中的疗效和毒性。方法2006年1月至2008年6月共40例患者入组,中位年龄62岁（45—74岁）。治疗方案：第1、8天吉西他滨1000mg／m^2,卡铂350mg／m^2第3天,3周重复。结果40例患者共完成化疗102个周期,获PR16例,SD15例,PD9例。疾病进展时问和1年生存率分别为5．2个月和37．5％。主要毒副作用为骨髓抑制,包括白细胞减少、血小板降低和贫血。无治疗相关死亡。结论该剂量吉西他滨联合卡铂治疗方案在晚期NSCLC中疗效较好,毒副作用可耐受,值得临床进一步推广。     

吉西他滨和顺铂联合重组人血管内皮抑制素治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌临床观察

目的评价吉西他滨和顺铂联合重组人血管内皮抑制素（恩度）治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性。方法 38例病理确诊的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者给予吉西他滨和顺铂联合恩度治疗,吉西他滨1000mg/m2,第1,8天,顺铂75mg/m2,第2天,恩度注射液7.5mg/m2加入500ml生理盐水中,滴注时间3～4小时,第1～14日,每21天为一周期。结果 38例患者入组,部分缓解13例,疾病稳定17例,疾病进展8例,客观有效率为34.2%,疾病控制率为78.9%。本组中位无进展生存期为4.6个月,95%CI为2.600～6.600个月,中位生存期为13.5个月,95%CI为9.599～17.401个月,1年生存率42.1%。结论吉西他滨和顺铂联合恩度治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌,有较好的疗效和安全性,具有较好临床应用前景。     

Biweekly administration of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with anthracycline and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer

Gemcitabine and cisplatin are the active agents in metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anthracycline and/or taxane as a second line treatment. The present study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of this regimen given biweekly schedule in these patients. Twenty-seven women, median age 57, with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline and taxane were eligible for enrollment. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously on days 1 and 15 at a dose of 2,000 mg/m(2) and Cisplatin was given intravenously on day 1 and 15 at a dose of 50 mg/m(2). Treatment cycles were repeated on an outpatient basis every 28 days. Of all 27 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 26% (7 of 27; 95% CI: 11-46%) with seven all partial responses. The stable diseases were found in 9 (33%) patients. At the time of last follow-up, 11 (41%) of the patients died of their disease progression. The median overall survival duration was 7.4 +/- 2.8 months. The 1-year overall survival rate was 46.9% +/- 12.3. Hematological toxicity was not found as the principal dose-limiting toxicity. Severe (grade III/IV) neutropenia was observed only one (4%) patients. No patient was complicated by febrile neutropenia and G-CSF usage was not performed. Grade III and IV anemia were seen in only 4 (15%) and thrombocytopenia was noted only one (4%) patients. Severe hepatic (n = 2) and renal toxicity (n = 1) were observed and these all recovered completely without complication. Several other severe non-hematological side effects were managed easily. Permanent dose reductions were necessary in 9 (33%) patients and chemotherapy administration was also delayed in 7 (26%) patients because of delayed both hematological and non-hematological toxicity recovery. Treatment was discontinued in one (4%) patient due to severe fatigue and deteriorating performance status. In conclusion, gemcitabine and cisplatin combination therapy with this biweekly schedule and dosage is moderately active and extremely safe in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline and taxanes.     

Phase II study of BBR 3464 as treatment in patients with sensitive or refractory small cell lung cancer

BBR 3464 is a novel triplatinum compound that has exhibited anti-tumor activity in both cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant, as well as in p53 mutant tumor models. In phase I testing, the dose-limiting toxicities have included myelosuppression and diarrhea. Both an intermittent (day 1 every 21-28 days) and a continuous (dailyx5 days) schedule have been studied, and the intermittent schedule has been chosen for further development. The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of BBR 3464 administered at a dose of 0.9 mg/m i.v. over 1 h every 21 days in patients with small cell lung cancer who have progressed after first-line therapy. Pharmacokinetic analysis was also performed and will be reported. Patients were stratified based on prior response into resistant and sensitive (response duration 3 months or longer) subgroups. Thirty-seven patients were enrolled onto this multicenter study. The median number of cycles delivered was 2 in the resistant subgroup (range 1-12) and 3 in the sensitive subgroup (range 1-8). Most common grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (62%), febrile neutropenia (16%), anemia (10%), fatigue (5%) and hypokalemia (5%). Although no objective responses were seen in 34 evaluable patients, 11 patients (32%) had disease stabilization (four resistant/seven sensitive) with 23 patients (68%) experiencing continued disease progression (12 resistant/11 sensitive). Median time to progression was 53 days in the resistant subgroup [95% confidence interval (CI) 37-63] and 66 days in the sensitive subgroup (95% CI 51-136). The median and 1-year survival rate based on subgroup was 78 (resistant) (95% CI 56-165) versus 209 days (sensitive) (95% CI 83-296) and 6 (resistant) (95% CI 0-17) versus 20% (95% CI 2-38%), respectively. We conclude that the toxicity profile of BBR 3464 in this phase II trial is consistent with the phase I experience. The lack of activity in either patient subgroup, however, does not support further evaluation of this drug as a single agent in this disease.     

Weekly paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study

We conducted a phase II study to determine the activity and tolerability of weekly paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support in anthracycline-pre-treated or -resistant metastatic breast cancer patients. The phase II study was designed following the Simon optimal-two stage method. Patients received paclitaxel 80 mg/m, folinic acid 10 mg/m and bolus infusion of 5-FU 300 mg/m every week plus G-CSF on day 3 for 24 consecutive weeks in the absence of disease progression. From May 1998 to May 2000, 51 patients entered the study. Patients received a median relative dose intensity of 97.5% (range 81-100%). No severe toxicities were observed. Seven patients (14%) experienced neutropenia grade 2. Seven patients (14%) experienced grade 2 anemia. Two patients (4%) experienced severe asthenia. Three out of 50 evaluable patients [6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2-12.6%] showed a complete response, whereas 23 (46%, 95% CI 32.2-59.8%) had a partial response, with an overall response rate of 52% (95% CI 38.2-65.8%). In addition, eight patients (15.7%) had stable disease. In the 13 patients untreated for metastatic disease, the overall response rate was 92.3% (CI 77.8-100), with one complete response and 11 partial responses (84.6% CI 65-100%). In the whole group, the median time to progression and overall survival were 8 (range 1-18) and 14 months (95% CI 11-17), respectively. Thus, in metastatic breast cancer patients pre-treated with anthracyclines, the weekly administration of paclitaxel, 5-FU and folinic acid with G-CSF support seems to be extremely tolerable and active.