Randomized study of high-dose and low-dose interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic renal cancer.

PURPOSE: This three-arm randomized study compares response rates and overall survival of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) receiving high-dose or one of two low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable metastatic RCC and a good performance status were randomized to receive either 720,000 U/kg (high-dose [HD]) or 72,000 U/kg (low-dose [LD]), both given by intravenous (IV) bolus every 8 hours. After randomly assigning 117 patients, a third arm of low-dose daily subcutaneous IL-2 was added, and an additional 283 patients were randomly assigned. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were randomly assigned to HD IV IL-2, and 150 patients to LD IV IL-2. Toxicities were less frequent with LD IV IL-2 (especially hypotension), but there were no IL-2-related deaths in any arm. There was a higher response proportion with HD IV IL-2 (21%) versus LD IV IL-2 (13%; P =.048) but no overall survival difference. The response rate of subcutaneous IL-2 (10%, partial response and complete response) was similar to that of LD IV IL-2, differing from HD IV (P =.033). Response durability and survival in completely responding patients was superior with HD IV compared with LD IV therapy (P =.04). CONCLUSION: Major tumor regressions, as well as complete responses, were seen with all regimens tested. IL-2 was more clinically active at maximal doses, although this did not produce an overall survival benefit. The immunological factors which constrain the curative potential of IL-2 to only a small percentage of patients need to be further elucidated.     

Implications of therapy choice on overall survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of high-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) vs other cytokine therapies on 1-, 2, and 5-yr overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with untreated metastatic RCC treated by a single investigator. The different treatment groups included HD IL-2, low-dose IL-2 alone or in combination, interferon alpha alone and other therapies. The primary end point was survival from time of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients were studies with a median follow up of 13 mo (0.6-112.9). Median age at treatment was 59 yr with predominantly male patients and histology of clear cell type. Thirty-four percent received HD IL-2 and treatment was initiated less than 6 mo from the time of diagnosis in 66%. For all patients, median survival was 16 mo with a 5-yr survival of 12%. Two factors were good predictors of overall survival: Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of 100 (p < 0.0001) and soft tissue metastasis (p = 0.01). When comparing HD IL-2 to all other groups, median survival was 18 vs 14 mo and 1-yr survival was 74% vs 51%, respectively. CONCLUSION: HD IL-2 is associated with clinically meaningful improvement in median and 1-yr survival.     

Current Algorithms and Prognostic Factors in the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is highly resistant to chemotherapy but responds modestly to cytokine therapy. The prognosis for longterm survival is poor. Approximately 10% of patients who present with metastatic disease or relapse after nephrectomy are alive at 5 years. Identification of prognostic or predictive factors for individual patient outcomes is necessary in order to develop tailored treatments that reduce the risk of relapse and enhance the chance of successful management. The relationship between pretreatment clinical features and survival has been evaluated in studies leading to the creation of a Memorial Sloan- Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk model. Additionally, the cloning of the von Hippel—Lindau tumor suppressor gene, and the elucidation of its role in upregulating growth factors associated with angiogenesis, has provided insight into RCC biology and defined a series of targets for novel therapeutic agents. These targeted agents, including sunitinib, sorafenib, temsirolimus, everolimus, and bevacizumab plus interferon-α, have shown benefit in phase III trials in first- and second-line therapy. Analysis of the data from these trials and use of prognostic models have resulted in a new paradigm for the treatment of metastatic RCC. Herein, we review these targeted agents, the MSKCC risk model, and the new paradigm for treatment of metastatic RCC.     

Treatment outcome for metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND: Most clinical trial reports in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) do not distinguish between histologic subtypes, making it difficult to assess specific treatment efficacy. The current retrospective study sought to define clinical features and outcome data for metastatic papillary RCC. METHODS: Clinical features, treatment outcome, and survival were evaluated in 38 patients with metastatic papillary RCC who underwent clinical evaluation at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) between 1985 and 2005. Twenty-three of 513 individuals were identified from a clinical trial database, 14 of 1895 from a surgery database, and 1 of 357 from a pathology database. A literature review of systemic therapy in metastatic papillary RCC was performed. RESULTS: Among the 38 patients, 30 had been treated at MSKCC with various systemic therapies, including cytokines. Twelve therapies resulted in stable disease, 30 in initial progression of disease, and 1 in an unknown response. One patient had a partial response to sunitinib, a novel multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The median overall survival time for the entire study group was 8 months (95% confidence interval, 5-12). A literature review on treatment of metastatic papillary RCC produced 4 reports, confirming a lack of efficacy for systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A resistance to systemic therapy characterizes patients with metastatic papillary RCC. Further understanding of the genetics and molecular biology and subtypes involved may provide the basis for more effective agents. Treatment with targeted therapies or other experimental agents is warranted.     

Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Pazopanib in Patients With Intermediate Prognostic Risk Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

IntroductionThe objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness and safety of pazopanib in patients with intermediate-risk advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the PRINCIPAL study (NCT01649778).Patients and MethodsPatients had clear-cell advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma and met intermediate-risk International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) criteria. Assessments included progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, and safety. We also evaluated effectiveness based on number of risk factors, age, and performance status (PS), as well as safety in older and younger patients.ResultsThree hundred sixty three and 343 intermediate-risk MSKCC and IMDC patients were included, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 13.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.7-18.1 months) and 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.2-10.3 months) for patients with 1 and 2 MSKCC risk factors, respectively, and 13.1 months (95% CI, 10.7-18.1 months) and 8.1 months (95% CI, 6.4-10.7 months) for patients with 1 and 2 IMDC risk factors, respectively. The median overall survival was not reached and was 15.2 months (95% CI, 12.3-26.5 months) for patients with 1 and 2 MSKCC risk factors, respectively, and 33.9 months (95% CI, 33.9 months to not estimable) and 19.4 months (95% CI, 14.3 months to not estimable) with 1 and 2 IMDC risk factors, respectively. A lower overall response rate was observed with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS ≥ 2 (vs. PS < 2). All-grade treatment-related adverse events occurred in approximately 63% of patients, and the safety profile among older and younger patients was similar.ConclusionsOutcomes with pazopanib in intermediate-risk patients suggest that patients can be further stratified by number of risk factors (1 vs. 2) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS (< 2 vs. ≥ 2) to more accurately predict outcomes.     

Long-Term Response to Sunitinib Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundSunitinib achieves objective response and prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A subset of patients achieves long-term responses. The characteristics of patients who achieved long-term response (defined as patients achieving ongoing complete response [CR] or remaining progression free for > 18 months while receiving sunitinib) are reported.Patients and MethodsA database of 186 patients treated with sunitinib alone (n = 89) or in combination (n = 97) in 9 clinical trials was reviewed; all had 1 year or more follow-up from sunitinib start to data cutoff for analysis. Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.3-13.3); median overall survival (OS) was 30.4 months (95% CI, 21.5-36.8 months) for the 186 patients. Thirty-four patients were identified as long-term responders because they either had durable CR or remained progression free while receiving sunitinib for > 18 months.ResultsBest response for 34 long-term responders was CR in 3 patients, partial response (PR) in 24 patients, and stable disease in 7 patients. The median duration of sunitinib therapy was 24.9 months (range, 18.1-73.9 months). The median PFS among the long-term responders was 17.4 months (95% CI, 7-29.9 months) at a landmark PFS analysis performed after 18 months from treatment start. Univariate analysis from the 186 patients identified bone metastasis, lung metastasis, and intermediate/poor risk groups as adverse prognostic factors for long-term response.ConclusionSunitinib achieves long-term response in a subset of patients with metastatic RCC. Lack of bone metastasis or lung metastasis and good MSKCC risk status may predict long-term response.     

Treatments,Outcomes, and Validity of Prognostic Scores in Patients With Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: A 20-Year Single-Institution Experience

Introduction

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with a sarcomatoid component is a rare disease associated with a poor prognosis. We report the outcomes of 47 patients with metastatic sarcomatoid RCC (SRCC) treated with different modalities including chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or immunotherapy over 2 decades in a French cancer center. Furthermore, we assessed the validity of prognostic scores in this subset of RCC.

High-dose interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma whose disease progressed after biochemotherapy

The objective of this study was to report our experience with 38 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma treated with high-dose (HD) bolus interleukin (IL)-2 after disease progression on or after biochemotherapy as the only earlier treatment for metastatic disease. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with metastatic melanoma treated with HD IL-2 at the Oncology Center of Hospital Sirio-Libanes between October 2000 and December 2009. The treatment consisted of IL-2, of 600,000 U/kg every 8 h for up to 14 doses, followed by 1-week rest and readmission for the second cycle. Responders received up to four additional cycles. Median follow-up was 9 months. The overall response rate was 23.6%, and we found no correlation between earlier response to biochemotherapy and response to HD IL-2. The median survival was 9.5 months for all patients and 36.1 months for the responders. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were hypotension, diarrhea, and respiratory distress, and one patient died from septic shock. We concluded that HD IL-2 has clinically meaningful antitumor activity in patients with metastatic melanoma whose disease has progressed after biochemotherapy. This is a treatment alternative in patients with no central nervous system involvement and who are fit enough to tolerate it, regardless of the initial response to biochemotherapy.     

A population‐based study evaluating the impact of sunitinib on overall survival in the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer

BACKGROUND:

Sunitinib has replaced interferon (IFN) as a first‐line standard of care in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study aimed to determine overall survival and to confirm effectiveness in a population that includes poor prognosis patients.

METHODS:

Data were collected on all patients identified by the BC Cancer Registry with metastatic RCC who were treated with IFN or sunitinib. The IFN group consisted of patients who received IFN between January 2000 and October 2005, and the sunitinib group included patients treated with first‐line sunitinib from October 2005 to September 2007.

RESULTS:

There were 131 and 69 patients in the IFN and sunitinib groups, respectively. The median follow‐up of those still alive was 12.6 months. The median age (62 vs 63 years; P = .41), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic criteria (poor in 19% vs 30%; P = .41), and proportion with >1 metastasis (53% vs 62%; P = .21) were similar between the IFN and sunitinib groups, respectively. The median survival of the IFN and sunitinib groups was 8.7 and 17.3 months, respectively (log‐rank P = .004). The median survival of patients with favorable, intermediate, and poor MSKCC prognostic profiles in the IFN group was 22.9, 8.7, and 4.1 months, respectively (P < .001), whereas in the sunitinib group it was not reached, 16.8, and 10.7 months, respectively (P = .006). The hazard ratio of death after adjusting for MSKCC criteria was 0.49 (95% confidence interval, 0.31‐0.76; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The introduction of first‐line sunitinib was associated with a doubling of overall survival compared with patients treated with IFN alone. This benefit extended to patients with poor MSKCC prognostic profiles. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Treatment of metastatic melanoma using interleukin-2 alone or in conjunction with vaccines

PURPOSE: To identify prognostic factors associated with survival beyond 4 years and overall response in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with high-dose bolus i.v. interleukin-2 (IL-2) given either alone or in combination with a variety of melanoma vaccines. STUDY DESIGN: 684 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma received high-dose bolus i.v. IL-2 either alone or in conjunction with a variety of melanoma vaccines. Treatments occurred between August 1, 1985 and January 1, 2006. RESULTS: The overall objective response rate was 13% for patients receiving IL-2 alone and 16% for patients who received IL-2 with vaccine. In patients treated with IL-2 alone (n=305) and IL-2 with vaccine (n=379), having an objective response was associated with survival beyond 4 years (P<0.0001). No pretreatment factors could be identified that were strongly associated with increased rate of objective response or long-term survival in patients receiving IL-2 alone. In patients receiving IL-2 with vaccines, there were increased response rates in patients with s.c. or cutaneous disease only and lower response rates with visceral disease only. Patients who received the gp100:209-217(210M) peptide plus IL-2 showed a strong trend to increased objective responses compared with IL-2 alone (22% versus 12.8%; P=0.01) and also compared with patients who received a variety of vaccines that did not include this immunogenic peptide (13.8%; P=0.009). CONCLUSION: IL-2 can produce a modest response rate in patients with metastatic melanoma including patients with durable complete responses. S.c. or cutaneous disease only and vaccination with gp100:209-217(210M) peptide was associated with significant increase in response rates.     

Clinical outcome and prognostic survival factors in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with very low-dose interleukin-2, interferon-α, and tegafur-uracil: a single-institution experience

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to determine the efficacy and safety of very low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon (IFN)-alpha, and tegafur-uracil for patients with unresectable renal cell carcinoma (RCC), metastatic RCC, or both. Clinical prognostic factors were also investigated. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients underwent a 3-week treatment cycle of IL-2 (0.7 x 10(6) Japanese reference units [JRU])/person on days 1-3 weekly), IFN-alpha (3 x 10(6) international units/person, on days 1-5 weekly), and tegafururacil (300 mg/person daily). RESULTS: The median follow-up after treatment initiation was 11.3 months. A median of three (range, 1-20) treatment cycles was administered. Of 47 eligible patients, 4 had a treatment response (3 complete responses and 1 partial response; objective response rate, 8.5%). The median progression-free and overall survivals were 8.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.5-10.9 months) and 38.8 months (95% CI, 27.8-49.7 months), respectively. Only 8 patients had grade III/IV toxicities. Two parameters, i.e., the absence of a previous nephrectomy and a low hemoglobin level, were identified as independent factors predictive of poor survival. Patients with low or intermediate risk (presence of none or one of the two prognostic factors) had a durable median survival exceeding 30 months. High-risk patients with both risk factors had rapid disease progression despite treatment. CONCLUSION: While the effectiveness of this immunochemotherapy resulted in a limited antitumor response, low-and intermediate-risk patients with metastatic RCC seemed likely to have a survival benefit. Patient selection is essential to enhance treatment efficiency and avoid useless treatment for high-risk patients.     

Predictive factors of response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and the relation of response to survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer

Purpose: To identify pretreatment variables predicting overall and complete response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial cancer, and to study the relation between response and the duration of survival. Patients and methods: A total of 119 evaluable patients with recurrent locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer received cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in four consecutive phase II studies from 1987 to 1997. The relationship of pretreatment variables and response was evaluated with logistic regression, and prognostic factors for survival were analyzed with Cox's multivariate model. Results: Response was achieved in 49% of the patients with a complete response rate of 15%. Good performance status and absence of bone metastases were independently predictive of overall response. Good performance status and normal hemoglobin were independently predictive of complete response. Median survival was 8.9 months. Performance status, alkaline phosphatase, s-creatinine, liver and bone metastases were independent prognostic factors for survival. Median survival was 12.4 months in responding patients and 6.3 in non-responding patients. Response to chemotherapy was included in the multivariate model and was the strongest prognostic factor for survival. Conclusion: The presence of bone metastases, low hemoglobin or poor performance status predicts decreased chance of response to chemotherapy. Response to chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor for prolonged survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Received: 23 February 2000 / Accepted: 26 June 2000     

Adjuvant high-dose bolus interleukin-2 for patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma: a cytokine working group randomized trial.

PURPOSE: This prospective, randomized, controlled phase III trial assessed high-dose bolus interleukin-2 (IL-2) postoperatively in patients with high-risk renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility requirements were resected locally advanced (LA; T3b-4 or N1-3) or metastatic (M1) RCC, no prior systemic therapy, and excellent organ function. Randomized assignment was to one course of IL-2 (600,000 U/kg every 8 hours on days 1 to 5 and days 15 to 19 [maximum 28 doses]) or observation. The study was designed and powered to show an improvement in predicted 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) from 40% for the observation group to 70% for the treatment group. The accrual goal was 68 patients with LA disease, with 34 patients per treatment arm. Metastasectomy patients were to be analyzed separately because of their unpredictable natural history. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were enrolled onto the study (44 LA and 25 M1 patients). Toxic effects of IL-2 were as anticipated; no unexpected serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred. Early closure occurred when an interim analysis determined that the 30% improvement in 2-year DFS could not be achieved despite full accrual. Sixteen of 21 LA patients receiving IL-2 experienced relapse, compared with 15 of 23 patients in the observation arm (P =.73); in the LA group, three deaths occurred in the IL-2 arm, and five deaths occurred in the observation arm (P =.38). Analysis including metastasectomy patients made no difference in DFS or overall survival. CONCLUSION: One course of high-dose bolus IL-2, though feasible, did not produce the ambitious clinically meaningful benefit anticipated when administered postoperatively to patients with resected high-risk RCC.     

Motexafin gadolinium for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: phase II study results

BACKGROUND: Thioredoxin reductase (Trx) has been implicated in activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha, which is overexpressed in > 85% of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of motexafin gadolinium (MGd), a Trx inhibitor, as a single-agent therapy for metastatic RCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic RCC were infused daily with MGd 5 mg/kg on days 1-5 and days 15-19 of each 28-day cycle. Patients were evaluated for response on days 21-28 of every third cycle. Those with tumor response or stable disease (SD) continued treatment for < or = 12 cycles. Twenty-five patients with confirmed metastatic RCC were enrolled. All were evaluable for toxicity, and 20 were evaluable for response. RESULTS: While no clinical responses were observed, 8 patients had SD after 3 treatment cycles, as did 4 after 6 cycles. Median overall survival was 10.1 months, and median progression- free survival was 2.7 months. The most common treatment-related toxicities were grade 1/2 pain, nausea, skin discoloration, fatigue, blisters, and headache. The most common grade 3 toxicity was hypophosphatemia, observed in 5 patients. MGd was reasonably tolerated, and disease stabilization was observed in several patients with metastatic RCC. CONCLUSION: These results show promise for the use of MGd in combination with other molecularly targeted therapies in previously treated patients with metastatic RCC. However, further investigation of MGd alone for metastatic RCC is not recommended.     

Clinical benefits of systemic chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pheochromocytomas or sympathetic extra-adrenal paragangliomas: insights from the largest single-institutional experience

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of systemic chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pheochromocytomas or sympathetic paragangliomas by assessing reductions in tumor size and blood pressure and improvements in overall survival (OS).

METHODS:

The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with metastatic pheochromocytomas‐sympathetic paragangliomas who had received chemotherapy at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

RESULTS:

Clinical benefit and OS were assessed. Of 54 patients who received chemotherapy, 52 patients were evaluable for response. Seventeen patients (33%) experienced a response, which was defined as decreased or normalized blood pressure/decreased number and dosage of antihypertensive medications and/or reduced tumor size after the first chemotherapy regimen. The median OS was 6.4 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2‐16.4 years) for responders and 3.7 years (95% CI, 3.0‐7.5 years) for nonresponders. Among the patients who had synchronous metastatic disease, a positive response at 1 year after the start of chemotherapy was associated with a trend toward longer OS (log‐rank test; P = .095). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, the effect of response to chemotherapy on OS was significant (hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, interval: 0.05‐1.0; P = .05). All responders had received dacarbazine and cyclophosphamide. Vincristine was included for 14 responders, and doxorubicin was included for 12 responders. The clinical factors that predicted response to chemotherapy could not be identified.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current results indicted that chemotherapy may decrease tumor size and facilitate blood pressure control in approximately 33% of patients with metastatic pheochromocytoma‐sympathetic paraganglioma. These patients exhibited longer survival. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

High-dose chemotherapy as primary treatment for poor-risk germ-cell tumors: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience (1988-1999)

Although the majority of patients with poor-risk germ-cell tumors (GCTs) will achieve a durable complete remission (CR) with standard first-line therapy, 20% to 30% of them will either relapse or fail to achieve an initial CR and eventually die. For this reason, the strategy of using high-dose (HD) chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support has been investigated to improve the chances of cure attainable in the salvage setting, but at a cost of significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment using HD therapy in the first-line setting offers the promise of reducing morbidity and mortality while increasing efficacy. At Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), trials were conducted to test this hypothesis. Patients at high risk of relapse following conventional therapy were identified, based on post-treatment serum marker concentrations that failed to appropriately decline by predicted half-life after several cycles of standard treatment. These patients received first-line HD treatment. Patients received a 2-drug HD regimen in one trial and an intensified 3-drug regimen in another, each with autologous bone marrow transplantation. These patients had improved overall and event-free survival rates (p = 0.001 and 0.003, respectively) compared with historical controls who underwent standard first-line treatment, with a lower incidence of treatment-related mortality than patients who received HD therapy in the salvage setting. Randomized trials are under way to prospectively verify these results.     

Phase II trial of weekly intravenous gemcitabine with continuous infusion fluorouracil in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical response rate of the combination of weekly intravenous (IV) gemcitabine with continuous infusion fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1998 and February 1999, 41 patients with metastatic RCC were enrolled onto this multi-institutional phase II study of gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2) over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 and 5-FU 150 mg/m(2)/d via continuous IV infusion through a permanent catheter on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. Patients had a Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status of 0 or 1, with a median time since diagnosis of metastatic disease of 10 months (range, 0 to 129 months). Thirty-three patients (80%) had multiple metastatic sites, and 34 patients (83%) had prior chemotherapy or immunotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 39 assessable patients, there were no complete responses but seven partial responses (objective response rate = 17%; 95% confidence interval, 8% to 34%). Five minor responses (25% to 50% decreased tumor size) were also observed. The duration of response for the seven partial responders was 2, 3, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 14 months. Median progression-free survival for the gemcitabine/5-FU group was 28.7 weeks versus 8 weeks for a similar cohort of patients treated on previous phase II studies at the University of Chicago (P =.008). The regimen was well tolerated, with fatigue, mucositis, nausea/vomiting, and grade 2 hematologic toxicities being most common. CONCLUSION: Weekly gemcitabine with continuous infusion 5-FU is an active combination in patients with metastatic RCC. Therapy was well tolerated and produced an improvement in progression-free survival over historical controls.     

Vinblastine and estramustine phosphate in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a phase II trial of the Fox Chase Network

BACKGROUND: It is well known that metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) exhibits constitutive resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. Antimicrotubule agents such as vinblastine are associated with low but reproducible response rates (approximately 12%) in patients with RCC. Estramustine has been shown to potentiate the antimicrotubule effects of vinblastine. The authors sought to increase the activity of vinblastine in RCC through the addition of estramustine. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with metastatic RCC not previously treated with chemotherapy received oral estramustine phosphate, 600 mg/m(2), on Days 1, 2, and 3 weekly for 6 weeks, and intravenous vinblastine, 4 mg/m(2) on Day 2 weekly for 6 weeks, repeated every 8 weeks. Twenty-one patients received 31 cycles of therapy. RESULTS: Two patients experienced Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity, and three patients had Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity consisting of neurologic toxicity, hepatic toxicity, or angioneurotic edema. One patient had a partial response with decreased liver metastases for 48 weeks; 9 patients had stable disease, for a median duration of 14 weeks (range, 11-31 weeks); and 11 patients demonstrated disease progression. The median overall time to progression was 8 weeks and the median overall survival period was 24 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Although well tolerated, the combination of oral estramustine phosphate with vinblastine administered on this schedule had minimal activity in patients with metastatic RCC.     

Safety and efficacy of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine combination for metastatic breast cancer

The aim of this prospective open-label study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral vinorelbine in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). 51 patients with MBC received oral vinorelbine and capecitabine. The safety profile was analyzed through NCI-CTCAE v3.0 and response was evaluated using RECIST criteria. The overall response rate was 37.2%: there were four complete responders (8%) and fifteen partial responders (29.4%); practically all the responders were patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Sixteen patients (31.3%) experienced stable disease. The clinical benefit rate was 68.5%. The median time to progression was 8 months (range 2-43; 95% CI: 6-10.8). Vinorelbine in combination with capecitabine is an effective and safe schedule for patients with MBC especially after pretreatment with anthracycline/ taxane-based regimens. The clinical benefit suggests that this may be a promising schedule in the MBC initial treatment.     

Radiation therapy and sorafenib: clinical data and rationale for the combination in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Sorafenib, an inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase, increases progression-free survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) compared with placebo. The efficacy and toxicity of combined sorafenib and radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of RCC are unknown. This is a retrospective report of 3 consecutive patients with metastatic or locally recurrent RCC treated with palliative RT while undergoing sorafenib therapy. All 3 patients experienced disease progression on sorafenib and remained on the drug without dose reduction during the RT plus sorafenib regimen. They were followed for toxicity and response by clinical history, physical examination, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans. Soon after completion of palliative RT, all 3 patients experienced complete pain relief without the need for narcotic pain medication. Posttreatment imaging revealed partial response with > 50% regression of tumor in all patients. None reported significant acute or late side effects at follow-up of 3, 6, and 8 months after RT and sorafenib. In the 3 patients with recurrent or metastatic RCC in this report, the combination of RT and sorafenib was well tolerated and resulted in excellent clinical and radiologic responses. This combination is promising and requires further study.