Pyogenic liver abscess: a review of 10 years' experience in management

BACKGROUND: Over the past 15 years, diagnostic and interventional radiology techniques have allowed accurate localization of liver abscesses and image-guided percutaneous drainage. This review examines whether these technical advances improve clinical results and discusses the selection of treatment for patients with liver abscesses. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients were treated for pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, between January 1987 and June 1997. The hospital records were examined and clinical presentation, laboratory, radiological and microbiological findings were recorded. Associations between these findings and failure of initial non-operative management were determined using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Independent predictors were then determined by logistic regression. This analysis was repeated to determine factors associated with mortality. RESULTS: Cholelithiasis and previous hepatobiliary surgery were the most frequently identifiable causes of PLA, each responsible in 15 patients. All 98 patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics and in 13 patients this was the only therapy. Of the remaining 85 patients, six proceeded straight to laparotomy and 79 had percutaneous drainage, of whom 15 required subsequent laparotomy. Factors predicting failure of initial non-operative management were unresolving jaundice, renal impairment secondary to clinical deterioration, multiloculation of the abscess, rupture on presentation and biliary communication. The overall hospital mortality rate was 8%. CONCLUSION: Pyogenic liver abscess remains a disease with significant mortality. Image-guided percutaneous drainage is appropriate treatment for single unilocular PLA. Surgical drainage is more likely to be required in patients who have abscess rupture, incomplete percutaneous drainage or who have uncorrected primary pathology.     

多房性细菌性肝脓肿手术和经皮穿刺引流的评价

目的 探讨治疗多房性细菌性肝脓肿的两种首选方案,比较手术和经皮穿刺引流的临床结果.方法 回顾性分析华西医院2003年6月至2008年6月收治的45例患者多房性细菌性肝脓肿的临床资料.根据手术方式分为2组,其中穿刺引流组21例,行B超或CT引导下经皮穿刺置管引流(pereutaneous drainage PD),开腹引流组24例,行经腹切开引流(surgical drainage SD).比较2组患者的退热时间、治疗失败、再次手术、住院天数及死亡率.结果 2组患者退热时间比较差异无统计学意义(4.85 d vs.4.38 d,P＞0.05),但是开腹引流组治疗失败率低(2例vs.9例,P＜0.05);再次手术机会小(1例vs.11例,P＜0.01);而且住院天数更短(8 d vs.11 d,P＜0.05).两组患者均无死亡.结论 根据结果显示,开腹引流在多房性细菌性肝脓肿治疗中能达到比经皮穿刺引流更好的临床结果.可提高成功率、减少再次手术机会和缩短住院天数,应作为首选治疗方案.     

Use of the computerized tomographic scan in the diagnosis and treatment of abscesses

Over a 5 year period, 89 patients underwent one or more computerized tomographic scans to locate an abscess during 92 hospitalizations. The scans were a most sensitive (93 percent), specific (98 percent), and accurate (96 percent) means of abscess detection. Thirty-nine patients had positive scans. Sixteen patients were treated directly by open surgical methods, 1 of whom required percutaneous drainage in the postoperative period for incomplete drainage. An additional 23 patients underwent attempted percutaneous abscess drainage. In 17 patients, drainage was successful. Five patients underwent percutaneous drainage and later required laparotomy, two of whom underwent unavoidable surgical procedures and three surgery for incomplete drainage. Overall, percutaneous abscess drainage was successful in 83 percent. Of 11 deaths, 8 occurred in the group with computerized tomographic scans negative for abscess. Three of these were false-negative scans. Three deaths occurred in the group with scans positive for abscess. All were of patients with hepatic abscesses treated by open surgical drainage, one after failed percutaneous drainage. Twelve patients had multiple organ failure, and 8 of these patients died, for a mortality of 67 percent. The computerized tomographic scan is the diagnostic procedure of choice in the diagnosis of abscesses. In selected patients, percutaneous abscess drainage is also a successful means of abscess treatment and avoids the complications of a laparotomy. The onset of multiple organ failure in the surgical patient should alert the diagnostician to the possibility of a septic focus. The role of early laparotomy in these patients is uncertain. We recommend early use of the computerized tomographic scan in the septic surgical patient. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of abscesses, whether by open or percutaneous routes, may avert the development of multiple organ failure and reduce morbidity and mortality.     

Abdominal wall abscesses in patients with crohn’s disease: Clinical outcome

Abdominal wall abscess due to Crohn’s Disease used to be one of the definitive indications for operative treatment. The advent of interventional radiology, the accessibility to percutaneous drainage, and the availability of new medications raised the possibility of nonoperative treatment of this condition. The clinical presentation, treatment, and follow-up of 13 patients with abdominal wall abscesses secondary to Crohn’s Disease were retrospectively reviewed. During a 10-year period (1993-2003), 13 patients with abdominal wall abscess were treated. Five patients had an anterolateral abdominal wall abscess and eight had a posterior abscess (psoas). In 11 patients, 17 drainage procedures were performed: 12 per-cutaneous and 5 operative. Despite initial adequate drainage and resolution of the abscess, all 13 patients eventually needed resection of the offending bowel segment, which was undertaken in 12 patients. The mean time between abscess presentation and definitive operation was 2 months. Percutaneous drainage is an attractive option in most cases of abdominal abscesses. However, in Crohn’s Disease patients with an abdominal wall abscess, we found a high failure rate despite initial adequate drainage. We suggest that surgical resection of the diseased bowel segment should be the definitive therapy. Presented at a Joint Meeting of the Israeli Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery and Israeli Society of Gastroenterology, Dead Sea, Israel, December 22, 2003.     

The role of percutaneous transhepatic abscess drainage for liver abscess

To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic abscess drainage (PTAD) as an initial choice of treatment for liver abscess, the medical records of 28 patients with liver abscess were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were predominantly men (23 of 28) with a mean age of 59 years (range, 19–86 years). Their chief complaints were fever (86%), right hypochondralgia (32%), and jaundice (11%). Fifteen of the 28 patients (54%) had hepatobiliary and pancreatic carcinoma, and 31% had postoperative liver abscess. PTAD was performed in 23 patients and surgical drainage in 5. The overall success rate for PTAD was 83%. The success rate for PTAD for patients with multiple abscesses was 83% (5 of 6), compared with a success rate of 82% (14 of 17) for patients with solitary abscess. The prognostic factors for survival were cancer and sepsis and the mortality rate for patients with cancer was 40% (6 of 15) while the mortality rate for patients with sepsis was 56% (5 of 9). As a complication of drainage, 1 patient (4%) in the PTAD group had pleural abscess due to the transpleural puncture. Our findings support the use of PTAD as the primary treatment for liver abscess, as it is safe and effective irrespective of the number of abscesses and the patient's condition. Received for publication on Sept. 7, 1998; accepted on Jan. 22, 1998     

Psoas abscess – not as rare as we think?

OBJECTIVE: Iliopsoas abscess (IPA) is a rare condition with a reported worldwide incidence of 12 new cases per year with primary abscesses now predominating. The presentation is often vague and the diagnosis not considered. METHOD: The medical records of 15 consecutive patients presenting to our hospital in a 3-year period with IPA were reviewed. Demographic data, presenting features, predisposing factors and the investigations performed were recorded. Abscesses were classified as primary or secondary and the treatment provided and eventual outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (eight males) were included. Nine patients were pyrexial on admission, 14 were anaemic and all had raised inflammatory markers. Only five patients presented with the classical triad of pain, fever and limp. The median time to diagnosis was 3 days with a median hospital stay of 27 days (range 7-243 days). Fourteen patients were diagnosed by computed tomographic scan. Three patients were treated with antibiotics alone whilst 11 received percutaneous drainage (PCD) as well. Of these, five had recurrence following initial drainage, needing further PCD procedures but none needed open drainage. Only one patient underwent open drainage initially. The mortality rate was 20%. CONCLUSION: The incidence of IPA is probably under-reported. The vague presentation leads to delays in diagnosis and increases morbidity and a high index of suspicion is the key to early diagnosis. Percutaneous drainage with antibiotics is the first line of treatment although recurrence rate is high. Open drainage allows simultaneous treatment of underlying pathology in secondary abscesses.     

Liver abscess after non-operative management of blunt liver injury

BACKGROUND: The non-operative management of blunt liver trauma can be applied in almost 80% of patients with this type of injury, with the advantages of the need for fewer blood transfusions, less intra-abdominal sepsis, and a better survival rate, than with the operative approach. However, liver abscess, as a known complication of the non-operative management of blunt liver trauma, is discussed infrequently. Therefore, we herein review our experience and describe this complication in detail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1995 to 2001, 674 patients were admitted to our hospital due to blunt hepatic trauma. Among these patients, 279 underwent laparotomy and the remaining 395 patients were treated non-operatively. Twenty-two patients were identified as having liver abscess, with 16 of them belonging to the operative group, and six to the non-operative group. A retrospective review of these six patients and their characteristics, as well as pathogenesis, diagnosis, and the management of the liver abscesses, was conducted. RESULTS: These six patients were all male, with a median age of 19.5 years (range 3-24). The median injury severity score was 16.5 (range 9-25); three patients sustained grade-3 hepatic injury, and the other three were grade 4. The main diagnostic tool was abdominal computed tomography, and the abscesses took a median of 6 days (range 1-12) to form and be diagnosed. The abscesses were usually caused by infection from mixed organisms, and an abscess resulting from Clostridium infection developed within 1 day after injury. These abscesses were treated with antibiotics and drainage, and the median length of hospital stay was 26 days (range 8-44), without mortality or long-term morbidity. CONCLUSION: Liver abscess as a complication of the non-operative management of blunt hepatic trauma is a rare entity, with an incidence of 1.5% (6/395). It is usually seen in severe liver injury (grade 3 and above), but all our patients were all treated successfully, with no mortality. However, prolonged hospitalization may be required in this patient group.     

An appraisal of surgical and percutaneous drainage for pyogenic liver abscesses larger than 5 cm

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether first-line treatment with percutaneous or surgical drainage of liver abscesses larger than 5 cm results in better clinical outcome. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pyogenic liver abscesses larger than 5 cm are currently treated by intravenous antibiotics and either percutaneous (PD) or surgical drainage (SD). Percutaneous techniques have been increasingly performed in place of open drainage as first-line treatment. This paradigm shift has been fueled by the drive for low-risk and less-invasive procedures and the surgical option being reserved for percutaneous failures. Yet there is a lack of data to support percutaneous drainage over open surgical drainage as first-line treatment. METHODS: Over a 3-year period, 80 patients with liver abscesses larger than 5 cm amenable to PD and SD were included in the study. This situation was possible as 1 team of surgeons favored the use of PD and 1 team favored the use of SD as first-line treatment. The treatment outcomes in both groups were compared, and clinical end-points included time to defervescence of fever, failure of treatment, secondary procedures, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: PD was performed in 36 patients and SD in 44 patients as first-line treatment. Clinical, laboratory, and abscess parameters were comparable in both groups. Sixty-four of 80 patients (80%) had multiloculated abscess. The time to defervescence of fever was not statistically significant (PD versus SD, 4.85 versus 4.38 days; P = 0.09). However, SD had less treatment failures (3 versus 10, P = 0.013), less requirement for secondary procedures (5 versus 13, P = 0.01), and shorter length of hospital stay (8 versus 11 days, P = 0.03). There was no difference in morbidity or mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that for large liver abscesses more than 5 cm, SD provides better clinical outcomes than PD in terms of treatment success, number of secondary procedures, and hospital stay with comparable morbidity and mortality rates. SD should be considered as first-line treatment of large liver abscesses.     

细菌性肝脓肿的放射介入和双介入治疗

目的: 探讨放射介入和双介入治疗细菌性肝脓肿的临床疗效. 方法: 回顾分析51例细菌性肝脓肿病人(其中12例行放射介入或双介入治疗)的临床资料. 结果: 介入组12例病人无1例需中转手术引流,均痊愈出院;对照组39例中,有2例因脓肿导管引流不畅需行手术引流,39例中死亡3例,均死于多脏器功能衰竭,病死率为7.7%(3/39),两组差异无显著性(P>0.05);两组病人的退热时间差异无显著性(P>0.05),但介入组脓肿消退时间显著短于对照组(P<0.01). 结论: 放射介入治疗联合经皮肝脓肿穿刺引流,即双介入治疗细菌性肝脓肿具有良好的疗效.     

Psoas abscess rarely requires surgical intervention

BACKGROUND: Surgeons are increasingly encountering psoas abscesses. METHODS: We performed a review of 41 adults diagnosed and treated for psoas abscess at a county hospital. Treatment modalities and outcomes were evaluated to develop a contemporary algorithm. RESULTS: Eighteen patients had a primary psoas abscess, and 23 had a secondary psoas abscess. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Intravenous drug abuse was the leading cause of primary abscesses. Secondary abscesses developed most commonly after abdominal surgery. Treatment was via open drainage (3%), computed tomography-guided percutaneous drainage (63%), or antibiotics alone (34%). Four recurrences occurred in the percutaneous group. Statistical analysis showed that the median size of psoas abscesses in the percutaneous group was significantly larger than in the antibiotics group (6 vs 2 cm; P < .001). The mortality rate was 3%. CONCLUSIONS: Initial management of psoas abscesses should be nonsurgical (90% success). Small abscesses may be treated with antibiotics alone, and surgery can be reserved for occasional complicated recurrences.     

Aggressive hepatic resection for patients with pyogenic liver abscess and APACHE II score > or =15

BACKGROUND: Most liver abscesses resolve after antimicrobial therapy or percutaneous tube drainage (PD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of hepatic resection (HR) for patients with pyogenic liver abscesses and an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score > or =15. METHODS: We compared the clinical outcomes of 81 patients with APACHE II scores > or =15 undergoing PD and/or HR. RESULTS: The failure rate (3 of 65) and double-treatment rate (32 of 65) in the PD group were significantly higher than in the HR group (3 of 35 vs 0 of 35; P = .0002). The mortality rate in the PD group was significantly higher than the other 2 groups (14 of 46 vs 2 of 19 and 1 of 16; P = .038). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter and antibiotic use less in the HR group than in the PD group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive HR for patients with liver abscesses and APACHE II scores > or =15 produced better clinical outcomes.     

CT-Guided transgluteal approach for percutaneous drainage of pelvic abscesses: results in 21 patients

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous drainage of pelvic abscesses may be challenging using a conventional anterior route because of overlying intestinal or vascular structures. Although, the posterior transgluteal route is not commonly performed, it may provide a safer approach when the conventional anterior route is not feasible. We retrospectively analyzed our experience in transgluteal percutaneous drainage of pelvic abscesses in 21 patients to determine the feasibility, safety, tolerance and efficacy of this technique. METHODS: The data of 21 patients with pelvic abscesses (15 postoperative and 6 secondary to diverticulitis) who were treated by CT-guided percutaneous transgluteal drainage between 1992 and 2002 were reviewed. Transgluteal drainage was considered as failure in case of persisting clinical sepsis, recurrence of abscess or when surgery was needed. RESULTS: The procedure was well tolerated in all patients. No major complication was observed. In one patient mild hematoma of the piriform muscle was noticed on postprocedure CT scan but did not require a specific treatment. Successful drainage as documented by follow-up CT examination was observed in 20 patients (20/21; 95%). One case of recurrence which was successfully treated by repeated percutaneous transgluteal drainage was observed in our series. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous imaging-guided transgluteal drainage is a feasible, safe, well-tolerated and effective method for the treatment of pelvic abscess when a conventional anterior route is not feasible.     

Laparoscopic drainage of intraabdominal abscess after appendectomy: an alternative to laparotomy in cases not amenable to percutaneous drainage

Purpose

Postoperative abscesses after appendectomy occur in 3% to 20% of cases and are more common in cases of perforated appendicitis. Smaller abscesses are often amenable to antibiotic therapy, but surgical drainage remains the mainstay of treatment for larger collections. Surgical options generally include percutaneous drainage and open laparotomy. Laparoscopic drainage of these abscesses has not been well characterized in the pediatric population.

Objective

The aim of this study was to describe our experience with laparoscopic drainage of postappendectomy abscesses that were not amenable to percutaneous drainage.

Methods

This study is a retrospective review of all pediatric patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis at a tertiary pediatric medical center during a 4-year period (2006-2009). The review focuses on patients who developed abscesses after appendectomy, were unable to undergo percutaneous drainage, and were treated with laparoscopic abscess drainage.

Results

Twelve patients (7 male and 5 female) underwent laparoscopic drainage of postappendectomy abscesses. The mean age was 8.5 years old (range, 3-14 years). A clinical diagnosis of postoperative abscess was made when fevers, pain, and leukocytosis persisted despite broad-spectrum antibiotics. Computed tomography was performed in all patients. Abscesses ranged between 3 and 11 cm in size. The mean length of time between initial appendectomy and drainage procedure was 10 days. There were no complications specifically related to the laparoscopic drainage procedure. The mean length of the drainage procedure was 77 minutes (range, 30-196 minutes). The mean hospital length of stay after laparoscopic drainage was 6.5 days (range, 3-13 days) with patients maintained on intravenous antibiotics until afebrile and without leukocytosis.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic drainage is a safe and effective alternative for intraabdominal abscesses that occur after laparoscopic appendectomy. We recommend it as an alternative to open laparotomy when percutaneous drainage is not an option.     

肾周脓肿25例的诊断与治疗

目的：提高肾周脓肿的诊断与治疗水平。方法：回顾性分析25例肾周脓肿患者的临床资料。结果：25例患者明确诊断为肾周脓肿，72％患者尿培养阳性，CT确诊率92％。3例(12％)死亡。10例患者脓肿直径1.8cm，单独使用抗生素治疗平均住院10d；11例脓肿平均直径11cm，采用抗生素联合经皮穿刺引流治疗，平均住院30d；4例最后进行了外科探查和肾切除。结论：肾周脓肿临床变化特点并不典型，CT检查是目前确诊最可靠的方法，通过明确的分期以获得理想的疗效。     

Renal and perirenal abscesses in patients with otherwise anatomically normal urinary tracts

PURPOSE: We characterized evaluation, management and outcomes in a group of patients diagnosed with renal and perirenal abscesses who had otherwise anatomically normal urinary tracts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our experience with renal/perirenal abscesses at University of Texas Medical Branch from 1991 to 2002. Treatment was determined by physician preference in each individual. RESULTS: Of 70 patients with renal/perirenal abscesses 26 had otherwise anatomically normal urinary tracts, 24 (92%) had at least 1 possible contributory factor, such as diabetes mellitus, and only 38% had the correct diagnosis at initial presentation. The abscess was intranephric in 39% of cases, intranephric and perinephric in 19%, and perinephric only in 42%. Of the 26 patients 18 were treated with percutaneous drainage or aspiration of the abscess and 12 (66.7%) had positive cultures. Eight of the 12 patients (67%) with positive abscess cultures had the same organism in urine and/or blood. All 26 patients were treated with broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. In most patients abscess size influenced additional treatments, such as percutaneous needle aspiration or catheter drainage. None of the patients required open surgical drainage, nephrectomy or nephrostomy tube placement. At a mean followup of 10 months all patients had complete radiographic resolution of the abscess without further complications except 1 who had pyelonephritis and another who was found to have a poorly perfused kidney. CONCLUSIONS: With accurate diagnosis and minimally invasive therapy patients with renal and/or perirenal abscesses and otherwise anatomically normal urinary tracts have excellent functional and anatomical outcomes.     

细菌性肝脓肿外科处理的临床分析

目的总结细菌性肝脓肿的诊治经验。方法对我院从1992年-2002年十年间所收治的105例细菌性肝脓肿病人进行回顾性分析。本组治疗方法包括：单纯抗生素治疗21例,外科手术引流30例,腹腔镜手术引流6例,经皮穿刺抽吸治疗42例,经皮穿刺置管引流治疗6例。结果本组治愈101例,死亡4例,死亡率3．8％。结论早期诊断和恰当的治疗是提高细菌性肝脓肿疗效的重要因素,超声引导下穿刺抽吸和／或置管引流已成为细菌性肝脓肿的治疗首选,适合于大部分病人。而外科手术引流仅适合于介入治疗失败或脓肿破裂病人。     

A Prospective Series Case Study of Pyogenic Liver Abscess: Recent Trands in Etiology and Management

Our study aims to review the literature on the management of pyogenic liver abscess, focusing on the choice of drainage. A case series of our experience with clinicopathological correlation is presented to highlight the indication and outcome of each modality of drainage. Intravenous antibiotic is the first line, and mainstay, of treatment. Drainage is necessary for large abscesses, equal to or larger than 5 cm in size, to facilitate resolution. While percutaneous drainage is appropriate as first-line surgical treatment in most cases, open surgical drainage is prudent in cases of rupture, multiloculation, associated biliary, or intra-abdominal pathology. Percutaneous drainage may help to optimize clinical condition prior to surgery. Nevertheless, in current good clinical practices, the choice of therapy needs to be individualized according to patient’s clinical status and abscess factors. They are complementary in the management of liver abscesses.     

The long-term results of percutaneous drainage of diverticular abscess

INTRODUCTION

Diverticulitis is a common condition occasionally complicated by abscess formation. Small abscesses may be managed by antibiotic therapy alone but larger collections require drainage, ideally by the percutaneous route. This minimally invasive approach is appealing but there is little information regarding the long-term follow-up of patients managed in this way. To address this question, we looked at a consecutive series of patients who underwent percutaneous drainage in our institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of patients undergoing percutaneous drainage of a diverticular abscess from 1999–2007.

RESULTS

A total of 26 abscesses were identified in 16 patients. In 69% of cases, the abscess was located in the pelvis. The mean size of the abscesses was 8.5 ± 0.9 cm. Drainage was performed under CT (83%) or ultrasound guidance. The mean duration of drainage was 8 days. Fistula formation following drainage occurred in 38% of cases. Eight patients (mean age, 71 years) underwent subsequent surgical resection 9 days to 22 months (mean, 7 months) following initial presentation. Eight patients with significant co-morbid conditions were managed by percutaneous drainage only. The 1-year mortality was 20% and resulted from unrelated causes. The long-term stoma rate was 13%.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous drainage can safely be performed in patients with a diverticular abscess. It can be used as a bridge before definitive surgery but also as a treatment option in its own right in high-risk surgical patients. We believe percutaneous drainage reduces the need for major surgery and reduces the risk of a permanent stoma.     

肝脓肿溃破77例分析

肝脓肿溃破是肝脓肿的主要并发症。作者总结该院近３０年来收治的肝脓肿溃破７７例，发现其几乎可破向肝周所有邻近脏器。导致肝脓肿溃破的原因包括就诊过晚、误诊、漏诊和处理不力等。提出预防肝脓肿溃破的关键是提高对本病的认识、早期诊断和及时有效的引流。认为经腹引流是最佳途径。大多数患者在肝脓肿溃破后需手术引流，同时经网膜静脉或脐静脉插管滴注有效抗生素。肝脓肿溃破的预后凶险，死亡率高，本组达３５．１％（２７／７７），死亡率与溃破所致的并发症密切相关。     

A comparative evaluation of percutaneous catheter drainage for resistant amebic liver abscesses

Resistance to drug treatment is a well-known problem in the management of patients with amebic liver abscesses. We undertook a comparison of the various modalities of treatment currently used for such cases on a prospective, randomized basis. Fifty patients with 56 amebic liver abscesses found to be resistant to drug therapy were included in the study. Repeat trial of conservative therapy, therapeutic needle aspirations, percutaneous catheter drainage, and open surgical drainage were the modalities of treatment employed. The responses to the various modalities were compared for clinical relief, morbidity, failure of response, period of hospital stay, and resolution of abscess cavity. The most impressive results were seen with percutaneous catheter drainage. This new modality of treatment is recommended for all resistant cases of amebic liver abscess.