The use of macrolides in treatment of upper respiratory tract infections

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem among upper respiratory tract pathogens. Resistance to β-lactam drugs among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pyogenes is increasing. As safe and well-tolerated antibiotics, macrolides play a key role in the treatment of community-acquired upper respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Their broad spectrum of activity against gram-positive cocci, such as S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes, atypical pathogens, H. influenzae (azithromycin and clarithromycin), and Moraxella catarrhalis, has led to the widespread use of macrolides for empiric treatment of upper RTIs and as alternatives for patients allergic to β-lactams. Macrolide resistance is increasing among pneumococci and recently among S. pyogenes, and is associated with increasing use of the newer macrolides, such as azithromycin. Ribosomal target modification mediated by erm(A) [erm(TR)] and erm(B) genes and active efflux due to mef(A) and mef(E) are the principal mechanisms of resistance in S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes. Recently, ribosomal protein and RNA mutations have been found responsible for acquired resistance to macrolides in S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, and H. influenzae. Although macrolides are only weakly active against macrolide-resistant streptococci species producing an efflux pump (mef) and are inactive against pathogens with ribosomal target modification (erm), treatment failures are uncommon. Therefore, macrolide therapy, for now, remains a good alternative for treatment of upper RTIs; however, continuous monitoring of the local resistance patterns is essential.     

The use of macrolides in treatment of upper respiratory tract infections

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing problem among upper respiratory tract pathogens. Resistance to β-lactam drugs among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pyogenes is increasing. As safe and well-tolerated antibiotics, macrolides play a key role in the treatment of community-acquired upper respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Their broad spectrum of activity against gram-positive cocci, such as S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes, atypical pathogens, H. influenzae (azithromycin and clarithromycin), and Moraxella catarrhalis, has led to the widespread use of macrolides for empiric treatment of upper RTIs and as alternatives for patients allergic to β-lactams. Macrolide resistance is increasing among pneumococci and recently among S. pyogenes, and is associated with increasing use of the newer macrolides, such as azithromycin. Ribosomal target modification mediated by erm(A) [erm(TR)] and erm(B) genes and active efflux due to mef(A) and mef(E) are the principal mechanisms of resistance in both S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes. Recently, ribosomal protein and RNA mutations have been found to be responsible for acquired resistance to macrolides in S. pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, and H. influenzae. Although macrolides are only weakly active against macrolide-resistant streptococci species, producing an efflux pump (mef), and are inactive against pathogens with ribosomal target modification (erm), treatment failures are uncommon. Therefore, macrolide therapy, for now, remains a good alternative for treatment of upper RTIs; however, continuous monitoring of the local resistance patterns is essential.     

A Pooled Analysis of Telithromycin in the Treatment of Community-Acquired Respiratory Tract Infections in Adults

Abstract. Background: Thirteen multinational, Phase III studies were conducted to establish the efficacy of telithromycin 800 mg once daily in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Patients and Methods: Data were analyzed from 4,743 adult patients participating across four indications: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) of mild to moderate severity, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS) and tonsillitis/pharyngitis. Results: Treatment with telithromycin for either 5 days (AECB, AMS and tonsillitis/pharyngitis) or 7–10 days (CAP and AMS) provided high rates of clinical and bacteriologic cure (5-day, 87.0% and 86.0%, respectively; 7 to 10-days, 90.3% and 90.5%, respectively) that were equivalent to those of a 10-day course of comparator antibacterials (86.5% and 86.5%, respectively). The clinical efficacy of telithromycin extended to high-risk CAP and AECB patients and to all key respiratory pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae strains resistant to penicillin or erythromycin and atypical/intracellular pathogens. Telithromycin was generally well-tolerated across patient groups. Conclusion: These findings support the use of telithromycin as an effective therapy for the treatment of community-acquired RTIs.     

Current issues in the management of bacterial respiratory tract disease: the challenge of antibacterial resistance

The worldwide burden of respiratory tract disease is enormous. Resistance to penicillins, macrolides, and cephalosporins is now detected among the leading bacterial pathogens that cause respiratory tract infections (RTIs)-Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. The increasing role of atypical/intracellular pathogens (eg, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila) in RTIs, as well as their increase in antibiotic resistance prevalence, continues to be of great concern. More recently introduced treatment options for RTIs include the newer respiratory fluoroquinolones, along with the macrolides and azalides. Although these agents demonstrate good activity against common respiratory pathogens, reduced susceptibility to these agents has been reported. The ketolides are recently developed antibacterial agents with targeted-spectrum activity against common respiratory tract pathogens, including atypical/intracellular pathogens, and a low potential for inducing resistance. These promising new drugs have shown in vitro and in vivo efficacy in the treatment of community-acquired RTIs, such as community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis.     

What is the clinical impact of macrolide resistance?

Respiratory tract infections are treated empirically. Treatment is based on the likely pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility. The most common respiratory tract pathogen is Streptococcus pneumoniae. In the United States, approximately 25% to 30% of S. pneumoniae are resistant to erythromycin and other macrolides. There are two mechanisms of resistance: ribosomal methylation that causes high-level resistance, and an efflux pump that causes low-level resistance. Macrolides are ineffective in animal models that use pneumococcal isolates with the methylase- or efflux-mediated resistance mechanisms. There are many case reports that describe clinical failure and isolation of a macrolide-resistant pneumococcus while a patient receives macrolide treatment. Two recent studies that included macrolide-susceptible and macrolideresistant pneumococci showed that breakthrough bacteremia in patients receiving macrolide treatment occurred only with macrolide-resistant isolates. Study of bacteremic disease ensures the pathogenic role of the pneumococcus; however, it underestimates the true clinical impact of macrolide resistance.     

Telithromycin

For the time being telithromycin is the only representative of a new group of antibiotics - ketolides - available for clinical use. Its chemical structure is derived from erythromycin, but it is better resorbed from the digestive tract and is efficacious against most macrolide-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes. Telithromycin is registered for the treatment of respiratory infections: sinusitis, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, community-acquired pneumonia and streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. The drug is well tolerated. It is less likely to induce MLS(B) resistance than macrolides with a 14- or 15-member ring.     

Telithromycin in the treatment of pneumococcal community-acquired respiratory tract infections: a review.

OBJECTIVES: A pooled analysis of 14 Phase III studies was performed to establish the clinical and bacteriologic efficacy of telithromycin 800 mg once daily in the treatment of pneumococcal community-acquired respiratory tract infections (RTIs). METHODS: Data were examined from 5534 adult/adolescent patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), or acute bacterial sinusitis, who had received telithromycin for 5-10 days or a comparator antibacterial. RESULTS: Streptococcus pneumoniae was identified in 704/2060 (34.2%) bacteriologically evaluable patients. The respective per-protocol clinical cure rates for telithromycin and comparators were 94.3% and 90.0% (CAP); 81.5% and 78.9% (AECB); 90.1% and 87.5% (acute sinusitis); 92.7% and 87.6% (all indications). Clinical cure rates were 28/34 (82.4%) and 5/7, respectively, for penicillin-resistant infections, and 44/52 (84.6%) and 11/14, respectively, for erythromycin-resistant infections. Of 82 patients with pneumococcal bacteremia, 74 (90.2%) were clinically cured after telithromycin treatment, including 5/7 and 8/10 with penicillin- or erythromycin-resistant strains, respectively. Adverse events considered possibly related to study medication were reported by 1071/4045 (26.5%) telithromycin and 505/1715 (29.4%) comparator recipients. These events were generally of mild/moderate severity, and mainly gastrointestinal in nature. CONCLUSIONS: As S. pneumoniae is the leading bacterial cause of community-acquired RTIs, and antibacterial resistance is increasing among this species, these findings support the use of telithromycin as first-line therapy in this setting.     

The epidemiology of respiratory tract infections

Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are the most common, and potentially most severe, of infections treated by health care practitioners. Lower RTIs along with influenza, are the most common cause of death by infection in the United States. Risk factors for pneumonia and other respiratory tract infections include: extremes of age (very young and elderly), smoking, alcoholism, immunosuppression, and comorbid conditions. The microbial cause of RTIs vary depending on the infection (i.e., pneumonia compared with acute bacterial sinusitis), setting (i.e., community-acquired compared with nosocomial), and other factors. The causative pathogens associated with CAP have changed in prevalence over time. Although Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the most common causative pathogen, a number of newer pathogens, such as Chlamydia pneumoniae and sin nombre virus, have been recognized in recent years. The emerging antimicrobial resistance of respiratory pathogens (most notably S. pneumoniae) has also increased the challenge for appropriate management of RTI. An awareness of the epidemiology and cause of specific respiratory infections should optimize care.     

Vaccine prevention of acute otitis media

The incidence of acute otitis media (AOM) in infants and young children has increased dramatically in recent years in the United States. AOM often follows upper respiratory tract infections due to pathogens such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza virus, and parainfluenza virus (PIV). These viruses cause eustachian tube dysfunction that is critical to the pathogenesis of AOM. Vaccines against these viruses would likely reduce the incidence of AOM. In three previous studies, influenza virus vaccines reduced the incidence of AOM by 30% to 36%. Vaccines to prevent infections with RSV and PIV type 3 are undergoing clinical testing at this time. Streptococcus pneumoniae, nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi), and Moraxella catarrhalis are the three most common AOM pathogens. Heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine is effective in preventing invasive disease and AOM caused by serotypes contained in the vaccine. Vaccine candidates for NTHi and M. catarrhalis are under development.     

The role of Mycoplasma in upper respiratory infections

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a common cause of upper and lower respiratory tract infections. Pneumonia is the most clinically important manifestation, but tracheobronchitis and various nonspecific upper respiratory tract symptoms are more typically seen in clinical settings. M. pneumoniae can cause pharyngitis with or without concomitant lower respiratory tract involvement, but it is less commonly detected in other upper respiratory conditions such as otitis media, sinusitis, and the common cold. A variety of methods exist for laboratory diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection, including culture, serology, and the polymerase chain reaction assay, but each has limitations. This article provides a summary of recent studies that have evaluated the role of M. pneumoniae in upper respiratory tract infections; a brief discussion of its cell biology, pathogenic mechanisms, and epidemiology; and recommendations for laboratory diagnosis and management.     

Antibacterial resistance among children with community-acquired respiratory tract infections (PROTEKT 1999-2000)

OBJECTIVE: To determine the susceptibility of bacterial respiratory tract pathogens, isolated from children (0-12 years) as part of the global PROTEKT surveillance study (1999-2000), to a range of antibacterials, including the ketolide telithromycin. METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations of the antibacterials studied were determined at a central laboratory using the NCCLS microdilution broth method. Macrolide resistance mechanisms were detected by PCR. RESULTS: Of 779 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates worldwide, 43% were non-susceptible to penicillin (18% intermediate; 25% resistant) and 37% were resistant to erythromycin, with considerable intercountry variation. Eighteen per cent of 653 Haemophilus influenzae and >90% of 316 Moraxella catarrhalis isolates produced beta-lactamase. Of 640 Streptococcus pyogenes isolates, 10% were resistant to erythromycin, with considerable intercountry variation. All S. pneumoniae and 99.8% of H. influenzae isolates were susceptible to telithromycin using breakpoints proposed to the NCCLS (相似文献   

In vitro activity of the new ketolide telithromycin and other antibiotics against Streptococcus pneumoniae in Belgium

In Belgium more than 17% of the invasive pneumococci are not susceptible to penicillin, and more than 38% not to macrolides. The most prevalent mechanism of macrolide resistance in Europe is modification of the drug target site leading to cross-resistance to lincosamides and group B streptogramines (MLSB resistance). Telithromycin is the first antibiotic of the family of ketolides, which differ from erythromycin by having a 3-keto group instead of the neutral sugar L-cladinose. We tested the susceptibility of 637 pneumococci, recently isolated from patients in Belgium, to telithromycin and five other antibiotics. Data generated by this study show that telithromycin inhibits 98.4% of pneumococci at a breakpoint concentration of 1 mg/L in spite of a high percentage (> 30%) of strains with the MLSB constitutive type of resistance. Susceptibilities to the five comparator drugs were: penicillin (81.8%), tetracycline (67.0%), levofloxacin (98.9%), erythromycin (61.5%) and clindamycin (66.6%). Consequently telithromycin looks to have considerable potential for the empiric treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections.     

Ribosomal resistance: Emerging problems and potential solutions

Many systemic antibiotics use ribosomal inhibition to suppress the replication of bacteria. Current research suggests that resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B (MLS_B) antibiotics is emerging among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Erythromycin methylases, encoded by erm genes, modify an essential adenine residue in 23S rRNA and confer cross-resistance to MLS_B antibiotics. More recently, macrolide efflux (mef) genes were identified in isolates of S. pyogenes and S. pneumoniae that show resistance to 14- and 15-membered macrolides (M phenotype). Resistance to MLSB has been associated with the increased use of erythromycin, and the recent emergence of the M phenotype has coincided with the marketing of newer macrolides. However, despite increasing macrolide resistance among clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae, convincing data on treatment failures directly attributable to MLSB or M phenotypes are limited. Possible solutions to emerging MLS_B and M phenotype resistance include the introduction of alternative antibiotics, the more prudent use of antibiotics, combination therapy, molecular diagnostics, enhanced understanding of pharmacodynamic variables, and redefined resistance breakpoints.     

Bacterial resistance and pharmacodynamics as the basis for prescribing antibiotics in respiratory infections

The choice of antibiotic therapy in respiratory tract infections is usually empirical. However, this choice is complicated by the increasing prevalence of resistant strains among the major bacterial pathogens involved in these infections, particularly Streptococcus pneumoniae. The aim of antimicrobial therapy in respiratory tract infections should be bacterial eradication, which is necessary to maximize clinical cure and minimize the development and spread of resistance. An increase in antimicrobial resistance reduces the probability of achieving eradication and increases the probability of clinical failure. Recent reports have demonstrated the clinical relevance of respiratory bacterial resistance to macrolides and some fluoroquinolones and betalactams. Unlike macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance, penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae can be overcome by increasing the dose, and hence increasing the time during which serum concentrations are above the MIC. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters can be used to establish breakpoints predictive of bacterial eradication. From the viewpoint of PK/PD, in Spain only high-doses of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (875/125 mg tid and 2000/125 mg bid) and levofloxacin, among the oral antibiotics considered, achieve optimal coverage against S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae.     

New Fluoroquinolones in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections and Emerging Patterns of Pneumococcal Resistance

Abstract The increasing resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most important community respiratory pathogen, to beta-lactams and other first-line antimicrobial agents usually employed for the empirical treatment of lower respiratory tract infections has led to the inclusion, in several current guidelines, of a fluoroquinolone with improved activity against pneumococci as the first choice agent for the management of such infections. The excellent microbiological, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the new fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and gatifloxacin) have encouraged their growing use, probably contributing to the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant pneumococci; although pneumococcal resistance to new fluoroquinolones is currently low, there is still concern about the potential for widespread emergence of resistance to these agents if they become indiscriminately used. Levofloxacin clinical failures have already been reported in the management of patients with pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia; development of resistance in clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae has prompted a critical reexamination of the newer fluoroquinolones to assess their potency and to preserve their activity. An understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, allowing selection of the most potent fluoroquinolone, will reduce the opportunity for resistance to develop. Finally, a targeted use of these agents will maintain class efficacy.     

Bacteria and viruses that cause respiratory tract infections during the pilgrimage (Haj) season in Makkah,Saudi Arabia

objective To determine the incidence and type of RTI-causing bacteria and viruses during a period of epidemic infections. method A total of 395 sputum specimens and 761 throat swabs were collected during the 1991 and 1992 pilgrimage seasons (Haj to Makkah Al-Mukarama, Saudi Arabia) from patients referred to one hospital and three dispensaries with symptoms of respiratory tract infections. All 761 throat swabs of both Haj seasons were also screened for the presence of viral pathogens with monoclonal antibodies specific for 7 viruses known to cause respiratory infections. results Bacterial pathogens were detected in 118 (29.9%) specimens. During the 1991 Haj season Haemophilus influenzae was the most frequent bacterial pathogen detected (10%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (5.2%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (4.8%), Staphylococcus aureus (3.8%) and Streptococcus pyogenes (2.4%). In the 1992 Haj season Klebsiella pneumoniae was predominant (15.1%), followed by Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus pneumoniae (12.3%). Screening of all sputum specimens for acid-fast bacteria showed that the overall incidence rate of tuberculosis was 1%. Cultures from the 761 throat swabs were largely negative for bacteria except for Streptococcus pyogenes isolated from 7 patients. Viruses were detected in 148 (19.5%) specimens with influenza A and adenovirus being the most common viruses. conclusion The pattern of virus prevalence in the 1991 and 1992 pilgrimage seasons was identical: influenza A and adenovirus predominated. Thus these two viruses should be targeted in future prophylactic measures.     

Macrolides,ketolides and streptogramins

Macrolides, ketolides and streptogramins are three families of antibiotics with different chemical structures, sharing the same mechanism of action. All three bind to distinct bases of the peptidyl transferase center of ARNr 23S. Their antibacterial spectrum practically overlaps, but dissimilarities in affinity and/or number of binding sites determine differences in the intensity of their antibacterial effects (bacteriostatic or bactericidae) and in their activity against strains with acquired resistance mechanisms. These agents are active against the majority of gram-positive microorganisms and many intracellular microorganisms for growth. Over the last five years in our country, the percentage of macrolide-resistant pneumococci and S. pyogenes strains has increased substantially. Telithromycin (ketolide) and Synercid (streptogramin) have shown maintained activity against these strains. Macrolides, ketolides and streptogramins are metabolized in the liver through CYP 3A4 and they can partially block the activity of the enzyme, interfering with the metabolism of other drugs that use the same metabolic pathway. There is little elimination through the urine, with the exception of clarithromycin. High concentrations are reached in the cellular cytoplasm, but they do not diffuse to the CSF. These agents are included among class B drugs for use during pregnancy. Tolerance to macrolides and telithromycin is good and they have few associated adverse effects. The main clinical indication for these drugs is in empirical treatment of mild to moderate, community-acquired, upper and lower respiratory tract infections. Synercid is indicated in the treatment of infections due to methicillin-resistant staphylococci and glycopeptide-resistant enterococci.     

IgA1 protease production by bacteria colonizing the upper respiratory tract

Summary Thirty-eight clinical isolates ofHaemophilus influenzae and ten clinical isolates ofStreptococcus pneumoniae were examined for IgA1 protease production. A suspension of surface material of each individual strain was incubated with human secretory IgA; IgA1 cleavage products were detected by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. The high incidence of IgA1 protease-positive strains (68.4% of the examinedH. influenzae and 100% of the examinedS. pneumoniae strains) confirms that IgA1 protease activity is a frequent characteristic of these two species. Yet the presence of this enzyme is, if at all, only a minor decisive factor for the induction of symptomatic infections of the upper respiratory tract by IgA1 protease-positive bacteria.     

Activity of telithromycin against key pathogens associated with community-acquired respiratory tract infections

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlation between in vitro susceptibility of isolates and clinical outcomes with telithromycin in respiratory tract infections. METHODS: The activity of telithromycin was determined by in vitro susceptibility testing of key respiratory tract pathogens isolated from patients with community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis or acute maxillary sinusitis enrolled in 14 Phase III/IV clinical trials evaluating the clinical efficacy of telithromycin. RESULTS: In this pooled analysis, telithromycin mode minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and MIC90, respectively, were: 0.016 and 0.03 mg/l against Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=626); 0.03 and 0.5 mg/l for penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (n=56); 0.03 and 1 mg/l for erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae (n=81); 2 and 4 mg/l against Haemophilus influenzae (including beta-lactamase producers; n=627); both 0.12 mg/l for Moraxella catarrhalis (n=159) and both 0.25 mg/l for Staphylococcus aureus (n=124). Telithromycin (5 or 7-10 days) resulted in overall clinical and bacteriologic success rates of 88.1% (1593/1808) and 89% (1593/1789), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of in vitro susceptibility to telithromycin are paralleled by high rates of clinical cure and bacteriologic eradication.     

PROTEKT 1999-2000: a multicentre study of the antimicrobial susceptibility of respiratory tract pathogens in Japan.

DESIGN: A six-centre study in Japan during the winter of 1999-2000 assessed the in vitro activity of >20 antimicrobial agents against the common respiratory pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of each antimicrobial was determined against these isolates using National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) methodology. RESULTS: Among S. pneumoniae isolates, 44.5% were penicillin resistant. The macrolide resistance rate was 77.9% with 90.5% of penicillin-resistant strains also being macrolide resistant. Resistance mechanisms in macrolide-resistant isolates were identified as mef(A) or erm(B) in 42.5% and 52.5%, respectively. Of the fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates (1.3%), most were also penicillin and macrolide resistant. All strains were inhibited by telithromycin at 相似文献