Blocking inhibition of prothrombinase by tissue factor pathway inhibitor alpha: a procoagulant property of heparins

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has procoagulant activity in antithrombin/heparin cofactor II (HCII)‐depleted plasma. UFH prevents tissue factor pathway inhibitor alpha (TFPIα) from inhibiting the procoagulant enzyme complex, prothrombinase, providing a possible mechanism for its procoagulant activity. The procoagulant potential of UFH and various low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) were characterized for TFPIα dependence, using thrombin generation assays performed with antithrombin/HCII‐depleted plasma. UFH, the LMWHs enoxaparin and dalteparin, and the low anticoagulant LMWH 2‐O, 3‐O desulphated heparin (ODSH) all promoted thrombin generation, but fondaparinux did not, and this activity was blocked by a TFPIα antibody. UFH, enoxaparin, and dalteparin were anticoagulant in reactions containing 1–2% normal plasma. In prothrombinase activity assays, UFH, enoxaparin, dalteparin and ODSH blocked prothrombinase inhibition by TFPIα, while again fondaparinux did not. In both the plasma and purified assays, LMWHs displayed greater procoagulant potential than UFH, even when normalized to saccharide concentration. These biochemical data reveal that UFH and LMWHs, but not fondaparinux, block prothrombinase inhibition by TFPIα, thereby producing their paradoxical procoagulant activity observed in the absence of antithrombin/HCII. The findings may help to understand the complex pathophysiology and treatment of patients that are simultaneously bleeding and clotting, such as those with disseminated intravascular coagulation.     

Abciximab Pharmacodynamics Are Unaffected by Antecedent Therapy with Other GPIIb/IIIa Antagonists in Non-Human Primates

Background: Tirofiban and eptifibatide are currently approved for the medical stabilization of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during infusion of these drugs, conversion to abciximab, which has long term proven clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness, following PCI may be desirable. The purpose of this study was to determine if the binding or pharmacodynamics of abciximab is affected by a prior infusion of either tirofiban or eptifibatide. Methods: In vitro binding experiments were performed to determine if prior exposure to tirofiban or eptifibatide altered the affinity and extent of binding of abciximab to GPIIb/IIIa. For in vivo experiments, cynomolgus monkeys were pretreated with a bolus and 18 hour infusion of saline, tirofiban, or eptifibatide. At the end of the initial treatment, a bolus and 12 hr infusion of abciximab was started without delay. Inhibition of platelet aggregation, GPIIb/IIIa receptor blockade and abciximab pharmacokinetics were measured during and after both infusions. Results: Equilibrium binding of abciximab in vitro was unaffected by tirofiban or eptifibatide. The extent and duration of abciximab inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation, receptor blockade, and abciximab pharmacokinetics in monkeys during and after the abciximab infusion were not affected by prior infusion of the animals with tirofiban or eptifibatide. Conclusions: In vitro and in vivo studies revealed that the molecular interaction of abciximab with the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor is not altered by immediate prior exposure of platelets to small molecule GPIIb/IIIa antagonists. These preclinical studies suggest that the efficacy of abciximab should not be impaired if it is initiated following termination of therapy with small molecule GPIIb/IIIa antagonists.     

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa and P2Y12 receptor antagonists yield additive inhibition of platelet aggregation, granule secretion, soluble CD40L release and procoagulant responses

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) antagonists, including abciximab and tirofiban, are administered concurrently with clopidogrel, a P2Y12 antagonist, and aspirin in some patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We studied the effects of, and interactions between, abciximab, tirofiban, aspirin and the P2Y12 antagonist cangrelor on platelet aggregation, alpha and dense granule secretion and procoagulant responses in vitro. Blood was obtained from healthy volunteers. Platelet aggregation, dense granule secretion, alpha granule secretion (PAI-1 and soluble CD40 ligand levels) and procoagulant responses (annexin-V and microparticle formation) were assessed using collagen and thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) as agonists. All the antagonists used singularly inhibited collagen-induced responses. Combinations of abciximab or tirofiban with aspirin and/or cangrelor gave additive inhibition with the greatest effect seen when abciximab or tirofiban was combined with both aspirin and cangrelor. Cangrelor inhibited TRAP-induced responses and, again, there was additive inhibition of these parameters when abciximab or tirofiban were combined with cangrelor. The GPIIb/IIIa receptor plays an important role in amplification of platelet activation such that there are important interactions between GPIIb/IIIa antagonists and inhibitors of both P2Y12 receptor activation and, to a lesser extent, thromboxane A2 generation. These interactions are likely to have important influences on the safety and efficacy of combination anti-platelet therapies.     

Pathophysiology of platelet activation and pharmacology of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors

PLATELET FUNCTION AND GPIIB/IIA ANTAGONISTS: Inhibition of platelet function can be obtained via two different mechanisms: Interaction with cellular signaling inside the platelet after stimulation by appropriate agonists, such as thrombin, thromboxane A2 or ADP. Alternatively, compounds might interfere directly with the final step, i.e. fibrinogen binding and platelet aggregate formation. This is the mechanism of action of GPIIb/IIIa antagonists, such as abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide. These receptor antagonists are platelet-selective because the receptor is only on platelets. Numerous clinical trials have established the usefulness of all three compounds in acute endothelial injury, as associated with percutaneous coronary interventions. CONCLUSION: It is currently unknown whether clinically relevant differences exist between the low-molecular weight (tirofiban, eptifibatide) compounds and the antibody abciximab because no direct comparison has been performed yet. However, the TARGET trial (tirofiban vs. abciximab in patients with acute coronary syndromes) is underway and probably will answer this question.     

Combination platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor and lepirudin administration during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

We evaluated a combination therapy using glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonism and direct thrombin inhibition in nine patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) undergoing 10 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). In selected patients with HIT, the combination of a direct thrombin inhibitor, lepirudin, and abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide appears to be a safe and effective anticoagulation strategy for PCI.     

Comparison of enoxaparin versus heparin during elective percutaneous coronary intervention performed with either eptifibatide or tirofiban (the ACTION Trial)

Limited data are available with regard to the pharmacodynamics and safety of combining enoxaparin with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition during elective percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). We randomized 200 patients to receive open-label enoxaparin (0.75 mg/kg intravenous bolus) or unfractionated heparin (60 U/kg intravenous bolus) and eptifibatide or tirofiban during PCI. This yielded 4 groups of combination therapy (50 patients/group). The first 10 patients per group had anti-Xa activity and inhibition of platelet aggregation measured at baseline, and at 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 4 hours, and 24 hours. All patients received aspirin and clopidogrel therapy before PCI. Patients who received enoxaparin and heparin achieved therapeutic peak anti-Xa activity observed shortly after drug administration. At 4 hours, a differential anticoagulant effect was observed, with patients who received enoxaparin having a more gradual decrease in anti-Xa activity. Patients who received eptifibatide achieved >80% inhibition of platelet aggregation soon after initiation of therapy more often than did those who received tirofiban. Type of heparin did not affect inhibition of platelet aggregation. Compared with patients who received heparin, periprocedural myocardial infarction and bleeding events occurred less frequently among those who received enoxaparin (14% vs 8% and 10% vs 5%); however, these differences were not statistically significant. Three cases of intraprocedural thrombus occurred among patients who received enoxaparin. Two patients received concomitant tirofiban therapy. Compared with unfractionated heparin, similar levels of anticoagulation and platelet inhibition are achieved with enoxaparin when concomitant therapy with eptifibatide or tirofiban is used during elective PCI, without an observed increase in early bleeding events or periprocedural ischemic complications.     

Differential inhibition of adenosine diphosphate- versus thrombin receptor-activating peptide-stimulated platelet fibrinogen binding by abciximab due to different glycoprotein IIb/IIIa activation kinetics

The exposure of internal glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptors has been proposed to explain the incomplete inhibition of aggregation of thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP)-stimulated platelets by abciximab. However, a marked and rapid externalization of GPIIb/IIIa was also observed upon stimulation with 30 microM adenosine diphosphate (ADP). ADP-induced fibrinogen binding was completely inhibited by 10 microg/mL abciximab, 30 nM tirofiban, or 3 microg/mL eptifibatide, while fibrinogen binding induced by 100 microM TRAP was inhibited only by 50%. Interestingly, striking differences in fibrinogen binding kinetics in ADP- versus TRAP-stimulated platelets were observed. ADP-induced fibrinogen binding was much slower than that of abciximab. These differences in the fibrinogen binding rate were due to differential GPIIb/IIIa activation kinetics because the actual fibrinogen binding rate (measured by adding fibrinogen after platelet activation) was similar in ADP- and TRAP-stimulated platelets. Thus, the TRAP-induced GPIIb/IIIa activation rate would allow significant amounts of fibrinogen to occupy externalized GPIIb/IIIa receptors even in the presence of the inhibitor.     

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and its clinical use

The activation of platelets and the resultant aggregation have been shown to play important role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular diseases and in acute coronary syndromes. Hence platelet adhesion and aggregation have been identified as promising targets for the development of anti-thrombotic drugs. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonism exerts a strong anti-platelet effect, because this interference inhibits the final common pathway of platelet aggregation and is not dependent on a single activation pathway. Three GPIIb/IIIa antagonists have been approved by the US Food and Drug administration. They include abciximab (the chimeric monoclonal antibody 7E3 Fab fragment), eptifibatide (the cyclic heptapeptide based on the KGD amino acid sequence) and tirofiban (a nonpeptide tyrosine derivative). In addition, nonpeptide oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonists are also in various stages of clinical development. This paper reviews the molecular biology of the GPIIb/IIIa receptor, history of development of GPIIb/IIIa antagonists, some issues about GPIIb/IIIb antagonists including their affinity, reversibility and receptor specificity, adverse effects including bleeding and thrombocytopenia, clinical trials and costs. Future direction in the development of GPIIb/IIIa antagonists is also discussed.     

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists and low-molecular weight heparin in acute coronary syndromes.

The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists and the low-molecular weight heparins are the newest additions to the armamentarium of antiplatelet drugs for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. They are extremely potent inhibitors of platelet aggregation and thrombin generation, respectively. There are currently three GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban) and two low-molecular weight heparins (dalteparin and enoxaparin) approved for use with acute coronary syndromes. Data continue to accumulate outlining the specific roles for these drugs in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Clinical trials in patients with acute coronary syndromes have demonstrated that the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists and low-molecular weight heparins offer significant benefit with acceptable safety profiles. Future issues that need to be addressed include refinement of indications for administration and patient selection, comparison between existing agents, evaluation of newer agents, and optimization of dosing to maximize benefit and safety in the use of these powerful new classes of drugs.     

Antiplatelet effects of abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide in patients undergoing coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate whether abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide achieve comparable antiplatelet effects with coronary stenting. BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide differ in chemical structure, binding site and pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing coronary stenting were randomly assigned to abciximab (bolus 0.25 mg/kg body weight, infusion 10 microg per min for 12 h), tirofiban (bolus 10 microg/kg, infusion 0.15 microg/kg per min for 72 h) or eptifibatide (bolus 180 microg/kg, infusion 2 microg/kg per min for 72 h). We took serial blood samples to analyze platelet function by using flow cytometry, turbidimetric aggregometry and the rapid platelet-function assay (RPFA). RESULTS: As assessed by RPFA, platelet aggregation after 2 h of infusion was reduced to 5.9 +/- 7.8% (mean +/- SD) of baseline by abciximab, to 5.0 +/- 5.4% by tirofiban and to 7.8 +/- 7.1% by eptifibatide (p = 0.42). Turbidimetric aggregometry with adenosine diphosphate stimulation yielded similar results, whereas percent inhibition of platelet aggregation after thrombin receptor stimulation was 45.8 +/- 16.8% with abciximab, 51.3 +/- 17.6% with tirofiban and 52.9 +/- 14.8% with eptifibatide (p = 0.37). Tirofiban and eptifibatide maintained their level of platelet inhibition during infusion. Flow cytometry revealed that the reduction in the monocyte-platelet interaction by abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide was not significantly different (20.0 +/- 21.9%, 23.8 +/- 18.2% and 21.0 +/- 19.8%, respectively; p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide, at currently recommended doses, achieved similar levels of inhibition of platelet aggregation and a similar reduction in the platelet-monocyte interaction.     

Elevating local concentrations of GPIIb–IIIa antagonists counteracts platelet thrombus stability

Glycoprotein IIb–IIIa (GPIIb–IIIa) antagonists have the capacity to destabilize coronary thrombi and restore vessel patency. Antagonist concentration and residence time, which can be increased by local intracoronary (LIC) administration, and thrombus age may be key factors that influence thrombus stability. Light transmission aggregometry was used to examine the effects of exposing human platelet aggregates to extremely high local levels of GPIIb–IIIa antagonists versus conventional therapeutic levels in vitro. Freshly-formed or aged platelet aggregates were subjected to GPIIb–IIIa antagonists (abciximab, eptifibatide) or direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin at concentrations simulating either conventional intravenous (IV) or LIC administration. The degree of antagonist-induced disaggregation was significantly higher using elevated (LIC) doses versus conventional (IV) doses (60.1 % vs. 7.4 % for abciximab, 41.6 % or 45.3 % vs. 17.6 % for eptifibatide, p < 0.01). Bivalirudin did not promote disaggregation. Microscopy confirmed noticeably smaller, more dispersed aggregates for antagonist LIC treatments. Dosing at LIC levels also induced more disaggregation than IV levels when aggregates were aged for 30 min prior to exposure. An in vitro perfusion model was used to simulate the fluid dynamics of IV or LIC administration of abciximab using a microporous local drug delivery balloon catheter such as the Atrium ClearWay? RX. The perfusion model resulted in more rapid thrombus clearance with LIC dosing levels compared to IV. In summary, boosting the concentration of GPIIb–IIIa antagonists enhances dispersal of human platelet aggregates in vitro. These data provide a foundation for investigating increased local concentrations of GPIIb–IIIa antagonists in patients, as with LIC administration.     

Comparative efficacy of fibrinogen and platelet supplementation on the in vitro reversibility of competitive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (alphaIIb/beta3) receptor-directed platelet inhibition

BACKGROUND: Platelet surface glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa (alphaIIb/beta(3)) receptor inhibition, by preventing fibrinogen binding and platelet aggregation, concomitantly attenuates arterial thrombotic capacity and impairs protective hemostasis, 2 divergent platelet-dependent processes. Because the currently available Food and Drug Administration-approved small molecule GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists are considered "competitive" inhibitors and because there is limited information on the reversibility of platelet inhibition by fibrinogen or platelet supplementation, the following series of in vitro experiments were performed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Washed platelets from 24 healthy volunteers were suspended in Tyrodes buffer and incubated with achievable (in vivo) steady-state concentrations of either tirofiban or eptifibatide before activation with TRAP (thrombin receptor agonist peptide) (15 micromol/L). Platelet aggregation was inhibited by 40% to 50%, but reversal was achieved by fibrinogen supplementation in a concentration-dependent manner. In a separate series of in vitro experiments, platelet inhibition exceeding 90% was established with tirofiban (average concentration 9.28 microg/L) and eptifibatide (average concentration 95.4 microg/L). Recovery of platelet aggregation to at least 50% was achieved after the addition of fibrinogen (0.76-0.80 g/L), platelets (2.4 x 10(11)/L), or their combination. There was an inverse relationship between plasma baseline fibrinogen and the amount of supplemental fibrinogen required to restore platelet aggregability (r = -0.60, P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: The reversibility of GP IIb/IIIa-directed platelet inhibition is influenced by cell surface receptor availability and the intrinsic pharmacodynamic mechanism of action. Fibrinogen supplementation with fresh frozen plasma or cryoprecipitate either alone or in combination with platelet transfusion, represents an important and readily available treatment consideration for restoring hemostatic potential and managing major hemorrhagic complications associated with the administration of small molecule competitive GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists.     

Effects of unfractionated heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists versus bivalirdin on myeloperoxidase release from neutrophils

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to determine whether adjunctive therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) affects markers of systemic inflammation or platelet activation. Despite different mechanisms of action, direct-thrombin inhibition with bivalirudin during PCI provided similar protection from periprocedural and chronic ischemic complications as compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus planned use of GPIIb/IIIa antagonists in the REPLACE-2 and ACUITY trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing nonurgent PCI of a native coronary artery were randomized to receive adjunctive therapy with bivalirudin or UFH+eptifibatide. Interleukin (IL)-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) transiently increased in both groups after PCI. In the UFH+eptifibatide, but not the bivalirudin group, myeloperoxidase (MPO) levels were elevated 2.3-fold above baseline (P=0.004) immediately after PCI. In an in vitro assay, heparin and to a lesser extent enoxaparin, but not bivalirudin or eptifibatide, stimulated MPO release from and binding to neutrophils and neutrophil activation. A mouse model of endoluminal femoral artery denudation was used to investigate further the importance of MPO in the context of arterial injury. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy during PCI may have undesired effects on neutrophil activation, MPO release, and systemic inflammation.     

Administration of eptifibatide to acute coronary syndrome patients receiving enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin: effect on platelet function and thrombus formation

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the antithrombotic effects of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) when combined with eptifibatide in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. BACKGROUND: An increasing number of high-risk ACS patients are treated with low-molecular-weight heparin and a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor. There is a paucity of data regarding the antithrombotic properties of such a combination as compared with UFH and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. METHODS: Twenty-six ACS patients scheduled to undergo coronary angiography were treated with subcutaneous enoxaparin (n = 13) or intravenous UFH (n = 13). All patients received eptifibatide just before coronary angiography. Antithrombotic effects were assessed as changes in platelet-thrombus formation using the Badimon ex vivo perfusion chamber. Perfusions were carried out at a high shear rate (HSR) and a low shear rate (LSR). Patients underwent two perfusion studies: at baseline (under enoxaparin or UFH) and 10 min after the eptifibatide bolus. Platelet function was evaluated by ADP-induced platelet aggregation and the rapid platelet function analyzer. RESULTS: Both therapeutic combinations achieved a marked reduction in platelet aggregation after eptifibatide (83% to 89.7% reduction in the enoxaparin-eptifibatide group and 77.8% to 85.5% reduction in the UFH-eptifibatide group, inter-group differences not significant). Both groups also demonstrated marked reductions in thrombus formation, but the reductions achieved in the enoxaparin-eptifibatide group were significantly higher than those achieved in the UFH-eptifibatide group (HSR: 75.6% reduction vs. 63.9%, respectively, p = 0.01; LSR: 79.7% reduction vs. 66.1%, respectively, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of eptifibatide with enoxaparin appears to have a more potent antithrombotic effect than that of eptifibatide and UFH in the doses tested.     

Combination Enoxaparin and Abciximab During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A New Standard of Care?

Evidence from randomized trials supports the administration of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade both to patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those presenting with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). Similarly, the low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), enoxaparin, has demonstrated superior efficacy when compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the treatment of patients with non-ST elevation ACS. Algorithms for seamless integration of pharmacotherpy through the course of hospitalization for patients who present with ACS and who require PCI will likely combine therapy with enoxaparin and platelet GP IIb/IIIa blockade (abciximab). Our preliminary experience with combination enoxaparin and abciximab as adjunctive pharmacotherapy for PCI suggests that this strategy is safe and effective and may offer advantages over a conventional strategy, which employs UFH.     

Comparative efficacy of different low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and drug interactions with LMWH: implications for management of vascular disorders

The low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are more efficacious and safer than unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis and to a certain extent in the treatment of acute ischemic syndromes. Because of their predictable pharmacokinetics and bioavailability after subcutaneous administration, LMWHs can be more convenient for outpatient use than UFH. Differences in the manufacturing process of LMWHs result in significant structural and molecular weight differences; thus, LMWHs have individual biochemical and pharmacological profiles and are not interchangeable on the basis of either mass or anti-Xa activity. Using thromboelastograph (TEG) and platelet aggregometry, this investigation compared the in vitro efficacy among various LMWHs and examined the interactions between LMWHs and platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists. TEG was used to determine the ability of platelet and fibrin interactions to augment blood clots, an effect measured under conditions of maximal platelet activation during clot formation accelerated by recombinant human tissue factor (TF). The comparative efficacy of LMWHs on different mediator-induced clot retraction in human blood was assessed by TEG, which demonstrated the potency of different LMWHs to inhibit various mediator-induced clot formations under shear. Tinzaparin was relatively more effective in inhibiting TF-, lipopolysaccharide-, factor (f) Xa-, and thrombin-induced clot formation under shear. Under these conditions, platelets significantly enhance clot strength (eightfold vs. platelet-free fibrin clots). LMWHs appear to have broader efficacy than other anticoagulants. Abciximab and roxifiban further inhibited clot strength by affecting the transmission of platelet contractile force to fibrin by platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptors. Subtherapeutic doses of tinzaparin combined with abciximab or roxifiban resulted in a distinct synergy that improved anticoagulant and antiplatelet efficacy mediated by TF, fXa, or thrombin. As these data suggest, the combination of low-dose tinzaparin with low-dose GPIIb/IIIa antagonists (abciximab, roxifiban) may be efficacious in the prevention and treatment of various thromboembolic disorders.     

Treatment of unstable angina: the role of platelet inhibitors and anticoagulants

Thrombo-occlusive events at sites of atherosclerotic stenosis and plaque rupture are caused by exposure of the sub-endothelial layer of the vasculature to platelets and their subsequent aggregation at the locus of injury. Thrombi are generated by the activation of platelets, which are not always inhibited by aspirin or heparin. Both unstable angina and myocardial infarction are ultimately linked to thrombus formation. In addition, various invasive procedures used to re-establish patency of coronary vessels are often followed by thrombotic events that can be life threatening. New antagonists to thrombin and the development of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa platelet receptor inhibitors have been the main focus of recent large clinical trials that have demonstrated both the efficacy and safety of these new agents. The new antithrombotics include hirudin, hirulog, and the low molecular weight heparins. Representative GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers include: abciximab, a human-murine chimeric monoclonal antibody; tirofiban, a non-peptide tyrosine derivative with a short half-life; and eptifibatide, a cyclic heptapeptide. All three are available for clinical use, but their approved indications vary. The GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists are anticipated to gain wide clinical acceptance by both cardiologists and internists and should have a prominent role in the management of acute coronary syndromes, most likely in combination with an antithrombin.     

Conformation-specific blockade of the integrin GPIIb/IIIa: a novel antiplatelet strategy that selectively targets activated platelets

Platelet activation causes conformational changes of integrin GPIIb/IIIa (alpha(IIb)beta3), resulting in the exposure of its ligand-binding pocket. This provides the unique possibility to design agents that specifically block activated platelets only. We used phage display of single-chain antibody (scFv) libraries in combination with several rounds of depletion/selection to obtain human scFvs that bind specifically to the activated conformation of GPIIb/IIIa. Functional evaluation of these scFv clones revealed that fibrinogen binding to human platelets and platelet aggregation can be effectively inhibited by activation-specific scFvs. In contrast to clinically used GPIIb/IIIa blockers, which are all conformation unspecific, activation-specific GPIIb/IIIa blockers do not induce conformational changes in GPIIb/IIIa or outside-in signaling, as evaluated by ligand-induced binding-site (LIBS) exposure in flow cytometry or P-selectin expression in immunofluorescence microscopy, respectively. In contrast to the conformation-unspecific blocker abciximab, activation-specific scFvs permit cell adhesion and spreading on immobilized fibrinogen, which is mediated by nonactivated GPIIb/IIIa. Mutagenesis studies and computer modeling indicate that exclusive binding of activation-specific scFv is mediated by RXD motifs in the heavy-chain complementary-determining region (CDR) 3 of the antibodies, which in comparison with other antibodies forms an exceptionally extended loop. In vivo experiments in a ferric-chloride thrombosis model of the mouse carotid artery demonstrate similar antithrombotic potency of activation-specific scFv, when compared with the conformation-unspecific blockers tirofiban and eptifibatide. However, in contrast to tirofiban and eptifibatide, bleeding times are not prolonged with the activation-specific scFvs, suggesting lower bleeding risks. In conclusion, activation-specific GPIIb/IIIa blockade via human single-chain antibodies represents a promising novel strategy for antiplatelet therapy.     

The pharmacodynamics of parenteral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors

Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists are a unique class of antiplatelet agents introduced for the management of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and those presenting with unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation (NSTE) myocardial infarction (MI), collectively recognized as acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Eptifibatide, abciximab, and tirofiban HCl are three GPIIb/IIIa antagonists approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration. Of the three agents, eptifibatide is approved for use in both PCI and NSTE ACS patient populations, whereas abciximab is indicated for patients undergoing PCI, and tirofiban is approved for patients with NSTE ACS. Dose selection for the initial trials using the three parenteral antagonists was based on in vitro and ex vivo pharmacodynamic assays conducted under different blood collection and platelet function assay conditions. Recent comparative pharmacodynamics studies, which used newly defined and standardized assay conditions, indicate that the platelet aggregation inhibition achieved with these dosing regimens is variable. Therefore, the differences in clinical efficacy as evidenced in the more recent clinical studies (e.g., Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet Receptor GPIIb/IIIa using Integrilin Therapy [ESPRIT], Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries IV Acute Coronary Syndromes [GUSTO-IV ACS], and Do Tirofiban HCl and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcomes Trial [TARGET]) may be related to the variable antiplatelet effects of the approved dose regimens.     

The TETAMI Trial: The Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin versus Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin and of Tirofiban versus Placebo in the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction for Patients Not Thrombolyzed: Methods and Design

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who do not receive early reperfusion therapy are at high risk of reinfarction or death, and the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy in this group of patients has not been evaluated. Enoxaparin is a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) that has previously been shown to reduce the incidence of ischemic events in patients with unstable angina or non–Q-wave MI. The principal aims of the TETAMI study are to investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with enoxaparin or tirofiban (a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist) alone or in combination for 2 to 8 days in patients with AMI who are not eligible for early reperfusion therapy. In this 2 by 2 factorial design study approximately 900 patients will be randomly assigned, in a blinded manner, to one of four treatments: enoxaparin alone, enoxaparin plus tirofiban, unfractionated heparin (UFH), or UFH plus tirofiban, with appropriate matched placebos. The primary end point is the composite of death, recurrent AMI, and recurrent angina, analyzed at 30 days after AMI. The design and methods of the TETAMI study are described in this article.