The role of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study

We evaluated contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) for the identification of recently ruptured cerebral aneurysms. We studied 23 aneurysms in 18 patients (age range 34–72 years) with aneurysms of the anterior (n=17) and posterior (n=6) circulation by comparing 3D time-of-flight (TOF), contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In four of 23 aneurysms, 3D-TOF did not show the lesion. Contrast-enhanced MRA successfully depicted all aneurysms except one. T1 contamination artefacts from subarachnoid or intraparenchymal haemorrhages were evident on the 3D-TOF images in six cases. The artefacts were completely eliminated on the contrast-enhanced MRA images by subtraction of the pre-contrast images. The diagnostic information in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhages (SAHs) provided by contrast-enhanced MRA was comparable to that provided by DSA.The contents of this article were presented as a poster entitled Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial aneurysms at the 28th annual meeting of the European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR), Istanbul, Turkey, 11–14 September 2003     

Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms after endosaccular packing with Guglielmi detachable coils: comparison with 3D digital subtraction angiography

The sensitivities and specificities of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF MRA) and 3D digital subtraction angiography (3D-DSA) were compared for evaluation of cerebral aneurysms after endosaccular packing with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs). Thirty-three patients with 33 aneurysms were included in this prospective study. 3D-TOF MRA and 3D-DSA were performed in the same week on all patients. Maximal intensity projection (MIP) and 3D reconstructed MRA images were compared with 3D-DSA images. The diameters of residual/recurrent aneurysms detected on 3D-DSA were calculated on a workstation. In 3 (9%) of 33 aneurysms, 3D-TOF MRA did not provide reliable information due to significant susceptibility artifacts on MRA. The sensitivity and specificity rates of MRA were 72.7 and 90.9%, respectively, for the diagnosis of residual/recurrent aneurysm. The diameters of residual/recurrent aneurysms that could not be detected by MRA were significantly smaller than those of detected aneurysms (mean 1.1 vs mean 2.3 mm). In one aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery (ACoA), the relationship between the residual aneurysm and the ACoA was more evident on MRA than DSA images. MRA can detect the recurrent/residual lumen of aneurysms treated with GDCs of up to at least 1.8 mm in diameter. 3D-TOF MRA is useful for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with GDCs, and could partly replace DSA.     

Follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3T in a large, prospective series

Objectives

To compare 3D-TOF magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) sequences at 3T in the follow-up of coiled aneurysms with digital subtracted angiography (DSA) as the gold standard.

Methods

DSA, 3D-TOF and CE-MRA were performed in a prospective series of 126 aneurysms in 96 patients (57 female, 39 male; age: 25–75 years, mean: 51.3?±?11.3 years). The quality of aneurysm occlusion was assessed independently and anonymously by a core laboratory.

Results

Using DSA (gold standard technique), total occlusion was depicted in 57 aneurysms (45.2%), neck remnant in 34 aneurysms (27.0%) and aneurysm remnant in 35 aneurysms (27.8%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were very similar with 3D-TOF and CE-MRA. Visibility of coils was much better with 3D-TOF (95.2%) than with CE-MRA (23.0%) (P?P?=?0.012).

Conclusions

In this large prospective series of patients with coiled aneurysms, at 3T 3D-TOF MRA was equivalent to CE-MRA for the evaluation of aneurysm occlusion, but coil visibility was superior at 3D-TOF. Thus the use of 3D-TOF at 3T is recommended for the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms.

Key Points

? Different Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging techniques are used to evaluate intracranial aneurysms. ? At 3T MR, 3D-TOF and CE-MRA appear equivalent for evaluating coiled aneurysms.. ? Coils are better visualised on 3D-TOF than on CE-MRA. ? Combined analysis of 3D-TOF and CE-MRA does not seem helpful. ? At 3T, 3D-TOF techniques are recommended for monitoring patients with coiled aneurysms.     

3D-SPACE序列结合3D-TOF MR血管成像在颅内动脉瘤支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后随访中的应用

目的探讨三维T1加权序列可变反转角度快速自旋回波序列(3D T1-SPACE)结合三维时间飞跃法MR血管成像(3D-TOF MRA)在颅内动脉瘤支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后患者随访中的应用价值。方法前瞻性收集2017年12月至2018年10月河南省人民医院收治的25例因颅内动脉瘤接受支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的患者,均为宽颈动脉瘤。术后6~10个月所有患者均行3D-TOF MRA、3D T1-SPACE序列MR扫描和DSA检查。分别使用3D-TOF MRA和DSA以Raymond分级法评价瘤腔栓塞情况,使用3D-TOF MRA和3D T1-SPACE序列以4分法评价载瘤动脉支架内管腔显示情况。采用配对设计的Wilcoxon秩和检验比较动脉瘤栓塞程度分级和支架内管腔显示情况。以DSA为金标准,计算3D-TOF MRA评估动脉瘤残留的特异度及准确率。结果术后6~10个月随访,对于动脉瘤闭塞情况,DSA造影显示Raymond 1级23例,2级1例,3级1例;3D-TOF MRA 1级21例,2级3例,3级1例;差异无统计学意义(Z=-0.557,P=0.577),其中有4例患者两种评估方法结果不一致。对于载瘤动脉支架内管腔情况的显示,3D-TOF MRA评分3分14例,2分8例,1分3例;3D T1-SPACE序列25例均为4分,3D T1-SPACE优于3D-TOF MRA(Z=-4.484,P<0.001)。以DSA为金标准,3D-TOF MRA结合原图像评估动脉瘤栓塞情况的特异度为86.9%(20/23),准确率为84.0%(21/25)。结论3.0 T MR 3D T1-SPACE序列可清晰显示支架内管腔,能准确判断支架内血管的通畅情况,3D-TOF MRA可充分评估动脉瘤瘤腔有无残留。将上述两种MRI血管成像技术相结合,可用于动脉瘤支架辅助栓塞术后的随访。     

CT angiography,MR angiography and rotational digital subtraction angiography for volumetric assessment of intracranial aneurysms. An experimental study

The purpose of our experimental study was to assess the accuracy and precision of CT angiography (CTA), MR angiography (MRA) and rotational digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for measuring the volume of an in vitro aneurysm model. A rigid model of the anterior cerebral circulation harbouring an anterior communicating aneurysm was connected to a pulsatile circuit. It was studied using unenhanced 3D time-of-flight MRA, contrast-enhanced CTA and rotational DSA angiography. The source images were then postprocessed on dedicated workstations to calculate the volume of the aneurysm. CTA was more accurate than MRA (P=0.0019). Rotational DSA was more accurate than CTA, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.1605), and significantly more accurate than MRA (P<0.00001). CTA was more precise than MRA (P=0.12), although this did not reach statistical significance. Rotational DSA can be part of the diagnosis, treatment planning and support endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The emerging endovascular treatment techniques which consist of using liquid polymers as implants to exclude aneurysms from arterial circulation would certainly benefit from this precise measurement of the volume of aneurysms.     

颅内动脉瘤 3D DCE-MRA与DSA对照研究

目的 探讨三维动态增强MR血管造影(3D DCE-MRA)在颅内动脉瘤诊断中的价值. 资料与方法 对39例临床拟诊动脉瘤和常规MRA可疑动脉瘤的患者行3D DCE-MRA,随后行DSA,比较两种方法 对颅内动脉瘤的显示情况. 结果 34例动脉瘤患者中共有动脉瘤41个,3D DCE-MRA对动脉瘤诊断的敏感性为95%,特异性为80%,准确性为85%,3D DCE-MRA与DSA比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05). 结论 3D DCE-MRA是一项无创、安全、简便和可靠的诊断颅内动脉瘤的方法,对于颅内较大血管的动脉瘤的显示,可以取代DSA.     

Aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The long-term outcome of patients treated with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs) remains unknown and is being evaluated. We sought to assess the feasibility and utility of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of anterior communicating artery (AcomA) aneurysms treated with GDCs. METHODS: In a prospective study, 20 consecutive patients with AcomA aneurysms underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA), time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF-MRA), and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) 12 months after treatment with GDCs. The aneurysmal sac measured less than 10 mm in 19 patients and 12 mm in one patient. Two observers who did not analyze the DSA images independently reviewed the MRA images. Aneurysms were classified according to the presence of a residual neck (ie, complete occlusion, small residual neck, large residual neck, or not assessable). DSA was used as the standard of reference. RESULTS: Images from all examinations were assessable. Venous enhancement was observed in five cases at contrast-enhanced MRA; this did not affect image interpretation. Interobserver agreement was good. A comparison of the techniques showed good agreement in the detection of a residual neck. Two cases of a small residual neck were not detected at TOF-MRA, and one case of complete occlusion was misclassified as a small residual neck at contrast-enhanced MRA. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that contrast-enhanced MRA is a valuable method for the follow-up of aneurysms in the AcomA after their treatment with GDCs. Further studies with multiple aneurysm locations and larger groups are required to determine the exact role of this technique.     

Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils, long-term follow-up is mandatory because coil compaction may occur and aneurysms may recur. The purpose of this study was to establish a noninvasive technique to visualize residual flow in coiled aneurysms. METHODS: We designed a 3D time-of-flight (3D-TOF) MR angiography (MRA) technique targeted to depict coiled aneurysms that employed a very short TE (1.54-1.60 ms) and a high spatial resolution (0.3 x 0.3 x 0.3 mm3 with zero-filling) to diminish spin dephasing. To diminish spin saturation, image volume was carefully positioned so that the neck of the targeted aneurysm was within 2 cm of the inflow portion along the stream of blood. Fifty-one MRA images of 39 coiled aneurysms in 39 patients were compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images. DSA and MRA findings were interpolated retrospectively for parent and branch arteries' patency, as well as residual flow in aneurysms. In the latest 11 MR studies, a dark-blood 3D turbo spin-echo sequence was added to MRA to negate the effect high-signal-intensity thrombus. RESULTS: MRA visualized all parent and branch arteries with DSA confirmation. MRA visualized residual flow more frequently (38 studies) than did DSA (25 studies). Residual flow space visualized with MRA was always similar to or larger than that with DSA. The dark-blood sequence completely suppressed intraluminal high signal intensity on MRA images and confirmed that the high signal intensity was not due to thrombus. CONCLUSION: TOF MRA targeted to depict coiled intracranial aneurysms is noninvasive and superior to DSA in visualization of residual flow and, hence, useful for follow-up of coiled aneurysms.     

Contrast-Enhanced Time-Resolved MRA for Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Endovascular reconstruction and flow diversion by using the Pipeline Embolization Device is an effective treatment for complex cerebral aneurysms. Accurate noninvasive alternatives to DSA for follow-up after Pipeline Embolization Device treatment are desirable. This study evaluated the accuracy of contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for this purpose, hypothesizing that contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA will be comparable with DSA and superior to 3D-TOF MRA.MATERIALS AND METHODS:During a 24-month period, 37 Pipeline Embolization Device–treated intracranial aneurysms in 26 patients underwent initial follow-up by using 3D-TOF MRA, contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA, and DSA. MRA was performed on a 1.5T unit by using 3D-TOF and time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics. All patients underwent DSA a median of 0 days (range, 0–68) after MRA. Studies were evaluated for aneurysm occlusion, quality of visualization of the reconstructed artery, and measurable luminal diameter of the Pipeline Embolization Device, with DSA used as the reference standard.RESULTS:The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA relative to DSA for posttreatment aneurysm occlusion were 96%, 85%, 92%, and 92%. Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA demonstrated superior quality of visualization (P = .0001) and a higher measurable luminal diameter (P = .0001) of the reconstructed artery compared with 3D-TOF MRA but no significant difference compared with DSA. Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA underestimated the luminal diameter of the reconstructed artery by 0.965 ± 0.497 mm (27% ± 13%) relative to DSA.CONCLUSIONS:Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA is a reliable noninvasive method for monitoring intracranial aneurysms following flow diversion and vessel reconstruction by using the Pipeline Embolization Device.

Surgical clipping or endovascular coil embolization is generally the preferred treatment for intracranial aneurysms.¹ The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED; Covidien, Irvine, California) is an endovascular device that has redefined the scope of treatment for large, giant, wide-neck, or fusiform aneurysms or aneurysms having failed coil embolization, by reconstructing the parent artery and restoring its natural course.² The PED is designed for 85% reduction of blood flow within an aneurysm, which induces thrombosis² while keeping perforators and/or side branch vessels patent.³ Results from a multicenter prospective trial for treatment of uncoilable or failed large and giant ICA aneurysms with the PED demonstrated 99% technical success and 74% complete occlusion with 6% major ipsilateral stroke or death.⁴ Flow diversion with the PED has also been reported in the treatment of HIV vasculopathy, with fusiform cerebral aneurysms precluding parent vessel sacrifice or surgical bypass.⁵Digital subtraction angiography is the reference standard for the evaluation of aneurysms after endovascular treatment due to its unsurpassed spatial resolution; however, DSA is invasive and not without risks of puncture site and neurologic complications.⁶ Posttreatment follow-up of intracranial aneurysms after coil embolization with MRA by using 3D-TOF or contrast-enhanced techniques is a potential noninvasive alternative to DSA for the evaluation of PED-treated aneurysms without the use of ionizing radiation.⁷ Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA (CE-TR MRA) uses acquisition schemes aimed at accelerated data collection, primarily using parallel imaging algorithms and novel k-space trajectories to achieve high temporal resolution for multiphasic MRA examinations. This technique provides consistent, technologist-independent, optimal arterial enhancement for contrast-enhanced MRA and provides information on temporal contrast kinetics.^8,9 Use of CE-TR MRA has been reported in the evaluation of intracranial lesions such as arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulas and for assessment of stenosis of the extracranial carotid artery, and it seems to be a promising technique for evaluating aneurysms after stent-assisted coil embolization.^9–11We hypothesized that TR-CE MRA could provide information comparable with DSA and would be superior to 3D-TOF MRA in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms and the parent artery following flow diversion and parent vessel reconstruction with the PED.     

Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intravascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms is a relatively new therapeutic technique and long-term controlled angiographic trials are needed to assess persistence of aneurysm occlusion. Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of 3D time-of-flight (3D-TOF) MR angiography as a noninvasive screening tool in the follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs). METHODS: Forty-nine patients with 50 intracranial aneurysms previously treated with GDCs were studied with both DSA and 3D-TOF MR angiography. In 14 cases, a second follow-up examination was performed, for a total of 64 aneurysms evaluated. In 25 aneurysms, both pre- and postcontrast MR angiographic studies were obtained. RESULTS: In seven of 64 aneurysms, the MR angiographic studies were considered to be unreliable owing to the presence of artifacts that obscured part of the parent artery and did not allow an accurate evaluation of the aneurysm neck. These seven aneurysms, however, all were shown to be completely occluded at digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In the remaining 57 aneurysms, DSA revealed complete occlusion in 39 and the presence of residual patency in 18, whereas MR angiography showed complete occlusion in 38 and residual patency in 19. Enhanced MR angiography proved to be useful in evaluating residual patency in large and giant aneurysms and in better depicting the distal branch arteries. CONCLUSION: Although artifacts related to the presence of coils are evident on a considerable number of imaging studies, our findings indicate that MR angiography is useful in the evaluation of residual patency of cerebral aneurysms treated with GDCs and may eventually prove valuable in the follow-up of those cases in which a good initial correlation with DSA was demonstrated.     

MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is used to follow-up intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils to identify recurrence and determine need for additional treatment. However, DSA is invasive and involves a small risk of neurologic complications. We assessed the feasibility and usefulness of 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA) performed at 3T compared with DSA for the follow-up of coil-treated intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: In a prospective study, 20 consecutive patients with 21 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils underwent DSA and nonenhanced and enhanced multiple overlapping thin-slab acquisition 3D TOF MRA at 3T on the same day at a mean follow-up of 6 months (range, 4-14 months) after coil placement. MRA images were evaluated for presence of artifacts, presence and size of aneurysm remnants and recurrences, patency of parent and branch vessels, and added value of contrast material enhancement. MRA and DSA findings were compared. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement of MRA was good, as was agreement between MRA and DSA. All three recurrences that needed additional treatment were detected with MRA. Minor disagreement occurred in four cases: three coil-treated aneurysms were scored on MRA images as having a small remnant, whereas on DSA images these aneurysms were occluded; the other aneurysm was scored on MRA images as having a small remnant, whereas on DSA images this was a small recurrence. Use of contrast material had no additional value. Coil-related MR imaging artifacts were minimal and did not interfere with evaluation of the occlusion status of the aneurysm. CONCLUSION: High-spatial-resolution 3D TOF MRA at 3T is feasible and useful in the follow-up of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with coil placement.     

Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of plain radiographs, 3D time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography

All patients with aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDC) are undergo angiography to assess long-term stability of aneurysm exclusion or to show recurrence of the aneurysm sac, which may require further treatment. We prospectively compared the plain-film appearance of the coil-mass, 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the detection of aneurysm recanalisation during follow-up. We studied 60 patients with 74 intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. We used the unsubtracted image of the angiograms performed at the completion of any embolisation procedure and at follow-up as the plain radiographs. Recanalisation was considered if loosening, compaction or reorientation of the coil mass was apparent. TOF MRA was performed to assess the presence and size of a neck remnant. DSA was regarded as the definitive investigation. Comparison of the techniques showed good agreement as regards aneurysm recanalisation. MRA was more accurate than plain radiography and could replace DSA for long term follow- up. The initial follow-up examination should, however, include both modalities. In cases of contraindications or limitations to MRA, the interval between follow-up angiographic examinations could be increased if there is no change in the plain-film coil-mass appearances.     

Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms selectively treated with coils: Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and usefulness of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils, by comparing CE-MRA with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and 3D time-of- flight (TOF) MRA. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with 42 treated aneurysms were included in the study; 6 had been treated for multiple aneurysms. All MRAs were performed with a 1.5T unit within 48 hours of DSA. We performed 2 types of acquisition: a 3D TOF sequence and CE-MRA. Twenty-eight patients were included 1 year after endovascular treatment, and 4 patients, after 3 years or more. DSA was the technique of reference for the detection of a residual neck or residual aneurysm. RESULTS: Compared with DSA, the sensitivity of MRA was good. For the detection of residual neck, there was no significant difference between the results of 3D TOF MRA (sensitivity, 75%-87.5%; specificity, 92.9%, according to both readers) and CE-MRA (sensitivity, 75%-82.1%; specificity, 85.7%-92.9%). For the detection of residual aneurysm, sensitivity and specificity of both techniques were the same, respectively 80%-100% and 97.3%-100%. Therefore, CE-MRA was not better than 3D TOF MRA for the detection of residual neck or residual aneurysm. For large treated aneurysms, there was no difference between decisions regarding further therapy after CE and 3D TOF MRA, even though CE-MRA with a short echotime and enhancement gave fewer artifacts and better visualization of recanalization than 3D TOF MRA. The interpretation of transverse source images and the detection of coil mesh packing seemed easier with 3D TOF imaging. CONCLUSION: This prospective study did not show that CE-MRA was significantly better than 3D TOF MRA for depicting aneurysm or neck remnants after selective endovascular treatment using coils. For aneurysms treated with coils, 3D TOF MRA seems a valid and useful technique for the follow-up of coiled aneurysms.     

Utility of CT angiography and MR angiography for the follow-up of experimental aneurysms treated with stents or Guglielmi detachable coils

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have depicted arterial and aneurysmal anatomy with three-dimensional time-of-flight (3D-TOF) MR angiography before and after treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs) and with CT angiography before and after treatment with stents and stent-grafts. We investigated the ability of time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography (3D MR digital subtraction angiography [DSA]) to accurately depict the anatomy of experimental lateral aneurysms before and after treatment with GDCs and a variety of stents or stent-grafts, and compared these findings with 3D-TOF MR angiography without and with contrast enhancement and CT angiography. METHODS: Two nitinol stents, two nitinol-polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) stent-grafts, and two stainless steel stents were deployed in three dogs with experimental carotid aneurysms. In a fourth animal, one of three aneurysms was completely occluded with GDCs. The other two aneurysms were loosely packed to ensure persistence of some residual aneurysmal lumen. Cut-film angiography, CT angiography, 3D-TOF MR angiography without and with contrast enhancement, and 3D MR DSA were performed in all dogs before and 3 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: 3D MR DSA was superior to conventional 3D-TOF MR angiography without and with contrast enhancement in accurately depicting experimental lateral aneurysms and superior to CT angiography in depicting aneurysms treated by GDCs. 3D MR DSA and CT angiography were comparable in depicting vessels treated with nitinol stents and stent-grafts, whereas CT angiography was superior for showing vessels treated by stainless steel stents. CONCLUSION: We recommend further development and clinical evaluation of 3D MR DSA for imaging cerebral aneurysms before and after treatment with GDCs. 3D MR DSA or CT angiography may be useful for evaluating vessels containing nitinol stents or nitinol-PTFE stent-grafts, whereas CT angiography should be used for follow-up of vessels treated by stainless steel stents.     

MRA在诊断颅内动脉瘤中的应用

目的：研究MRA诊断颅内动脉瘤的原理与方法，优势与不足以及临床价值。方法：选择经DSA证实为颅内动脉瘤的息者30例，行三维MRA及MRI检查，全部病例均经手术证实。结果：MRA对颅内动脉瘤的敏感性为90％，结合原始断层图像和MRI，敏感性则高达97％，较准确显示了3mm以上动脉瘤的形态、大小及与载瘤动脉的关系。对于检测血栓性动脉瘤MRA优于DSA影像。结论：MRA是一种无创伤的血管检查技术．可准确显示动脉瘤。对于Willis环区动脉瘤，MRA可取代常规血管造影。     

Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation by MR angiography

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a volume gradient-echo MR angiography (MRA) technique with that of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IA DSA) in the identification of intracranial aneurysms. The intracranial vasculature was examined in 47 patients by MRA and compared with IA DSA findings in 19 of these patients who had saccular or giant intracranial aneurysms. The remaining 28 patients, in whom no aneurysm was found, served as a control group. MRA was performed with the use of a velocity-compensated gradient-echo sequence (TR = 40-50/TE = 7-15) with a 15 degrees flip angle. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the evaluation of the cine 3D reconstructions (cine MRA) only, cine MRA + inspection of the individual partitions, and cine MRA + individual partitions + spin-echo studies. Of 21 aneurysms, of which three were missed in two patients, the sensitivity varied from 67% for cine MRA only to 86% for the cine MRA + partitions + spin-echo studies; of the 19 patients, among whom it was assumed that the diagnosis of any one aneurysm in a patient would lead to angiography and detection of additional aneurysms, the sensitivity varied from 73% for the cine MRA only to 95% for the cine MRA + partitions + spin-echo studies. The results of this study suggest that MRA can define the circle of Willis sufficiently to allow detection of intracranial aneurysms as small as 3-4 mm. MRA holds promise as a truly noninvasive screening examination of intracranial vasculature in patients at risk for aneurysms.     

Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation by MR angiography

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of a volume gradient-echo MR angiography (MRA) technique with that of intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (IA DSA) in the identification of intracranial aneurysms. The intracranial vasculature was examined in 47 patients by MRA and compared with IA DSA findings in 19 of these patients who had saccular or giant intracranial aneurysms. The remaining 28 patients, in whom no aneurysm was found, served as a control group. MRA was performed with the use of a velocity-compensated gradient-echo sequence (TR = 40-50/TE = 7-15) with a 15 degree flip angle. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the evaluation of the cine 3D reconstructions (cine MRA) only, cine MRA + inspection of the individual partitions, and cine MRA + individual partitions + spin-echo studies. Of 21 aneurysms, of which three were missed in two patients, the sensitivity varied from 67% for cine MRA only to 86% for the cine MRA + partitions + spin-echo studies; of the 19 patients, among whom it was assumed that the diagnosis of any one aneurysm in a patient would lead to angiography and detection of additional aneurysms, the sensitivity varied from 73% for the cine MRA only to 95% for the cine MRA + partitions + spin-echo studies. The results of this study suggest that MRA can define the circle of Willis sufficiently to allow detection of intracranial aneurysms as small as 3-4 mm. MRA holds promise as a truly noninvasive screening examination of intracranial vasculature in patients at risk for aneurysms.     

Diagnostic accuracy of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: influence of aneurysm size

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: 3D time-of-flight MR angiography (3D TOF MRA) may be used as noninvasive alternative to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the follow-up of patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs). We aimed to determine the influence of aneurysm size and location on diagnostic accuracy of 3D TOF MRA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with GDCs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and one 3D TOF MRAs in 127 consecutive patients with 136 aneurysms were compared with DSA as standard of reference. Sensitivity and specificity of 3D TOF MRA for detection of residual or reperfusion of the aneurysms was calculated with regard to aneurysm size and location. RESULTS: Overall sensitivity and specificity of MRA was 88.5% and 92.9%, respectively. Sensitivity was lower for aneurysms 相似文献   

螺旋CT血管造影在脑动脉瘤诊断及治疗中的应用—兼与MR血管造影比较

目的探讨无创性的螺旋CT血管造影(SCTA)与MR血管造影(MRA)对脑动脉瘤的诊断价值以及对治疗的指导价值,并对两者作比较.材料和方法28例患者同时行SCTA、MRA、DSA,以DSA作为金标准,对SCTA与MRA作比较.结果(1)23例行SCTA及时间飞跃法(TOF)MRA者,SCTA诊断脑动脉瘤的准确性高于TOFMRA,但差异无显著统计学意义(p＞0.05).(2)SCTA较TOFMRA测量脑动脉瘤的最大径准确性高(p＜0.01),TOFMRA测量值常偏小.(3)SCTA测量的栓塞治疗最佳投照角度与DSA符合率94.7%.(4)动态增强(DCE)MRA的图像清晰度及价值与SCTA相似.结论SCTA对体积小、破裂出血的脑动脉瘤的检出率以及对动脉瘤测量的精确性高于TOFMRA,SCTA可较准确地测量动脉瘤栓塞治疗的最佳投照角度,MRA是脑动脉瘤电解可脱弹簧圈(GDC)栓塞术后随访的较好方法,DCEMRA的实用价值与SCTA相似.     

三维动态增强MR血管造影对颅内动脉瘤的诊断价值

目的 评价三维动态增强磁共振血管造影(3D DCE-MRA)在颅内动脉瘤诊断中的价值。方法 对54例高度怀疑有颅内动脉瘤的病人行3D DCE-MRA检查，随后行DSA造影及可行的血管内栓塞治疗。3D DCE-MRA用超快速三维梯度回波序列(3D FISP)(钆喷替酸葡甲胺0．2mmol／kg,1次扫描时间10s)，工作站上三维重建，比较3D DCE-MRA及常规DSA在显示动脉瘤、瘤颈及与载瘤动脉关系上的优劣，及对血管内栓塞治疗的价值。结果 39例脑动脉瘤患者共45个动脉瘤，3D DCE-MRA对动脉瘤的敏感度为96％，特异度73％，准确度90％。3D DCE-MRA对动脉瘤细节及瘤颈的显示明显优于常规DSA，尤其是颈内动脉海绵窦部及椎动脉近小脑后下动脉的动脉瘤，可指导DSA显示动脉瘤方向及预先制定治疗方案。但对周边部及动脉分岔处小动脉瘤的诊断应谨慎。结论3D DCE-MRA能无创有效地诊断颅内动脉瘤，所提供的三维信息对治疗方案的制定具有极大帮助。当诊断有怀疑时，应结合DSA检查。