Effects of Left Atrial Dilatation on the Endocardial Atrial Defibrillation Threshold: A Study in an Ovine Model of Pacing Induced Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Left atrial (LA) dilatation is a common finding in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). Progressive dilatation may alter the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT). In our study, epicardial electrodes were implanted on the LA free wall and right ventricular apex of eight adult sheep. Large surface area, coiled endocardial electrodes were positioned in the coronary sinus and right atrium (RA). LA dilatation was induced by rapid ventricular pacing (190 beats/min) for 6 weeks and echocardiographically assessed weekly along with the ADFT (under propofol anesthesia). LA effective refractory period (ERP) was measured every 2–3 days using a standard extra stimulus technique and 400 ms drive. The AF cycle length (AFCL) was assessed from LA electrograms. During the 6 weeks of pacing the mean LA area increased from 6.1 ± 1.5 to 21.3 ± 2.4 cm². There were no significant changes in the mean ADFT (122 ± 15 V), circuit impedance (46 ± 5 Ω), or LA AFCL (136 ± 23 ms). There was a significant increase in the mean LA ERP (106 ± 10 ms at day 0, and 120 ± 13 ms at day 42 of pacing). In this study, using chronically implanted defibrillation leads, the minimal energy requirements for successful AF were not significantly altered by ongoing left atrial dilatation. This finding is a further endorsement of the efficiency of the coronary sinus/RA shock vector. Furthermore, the apparent stability of the AF present may be a further indication of a link between the type of AF and the ADFT.     

Rapid Atrial Pacing Does Not Decrease the Atrial Defibrillation Threshold

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of preshock atrial pacing on the atrial defibrillation threshold (DFT) during internal cardioversion of AF. The implantable atrial defibrillator has been added to the therapeutic options for patients with recurrent episodes of persistent AF. Although the device is efficient in restoring sinus rhythm, patient discomfort is a limitation. Methods that lower the ADFT are needed. Eleven patients with AF underwent internal cardioversion. In a randomized, crossover design, ADFT testing was performed, applying a step-up protocol starting at 100 V. Rapid atrial pacing was performed with a right atrial catheter for 20 seconds at 90% of the average cycle length of the fibrillatory waves and was immediately followed by a biphasic defibrillation shock. At each energy level, pacing + shock was compared to shock only, until the level at which sinus rhythm was restored by both modes. The step-up protocol was thereafter repeated using the inverse sequence of the two modes. A total of 19 ADFTs were obtained. For 10 the ADFT was lower with pacing + shock, in 4 equal and in 5 higher, than with shock only. The ADFT (mean ± SD) with pacing + shock was   260 ± 84   V   (3.4 ± 2.9 J)   and did not differ from shock only:   268 ± 85   V   (3.8 ± 3.0 J) (P > 0.05)   . The coefficient of variation and the coefficient of reproducibility for pacing + shock was 16% and 60 V, respectively, and for shock only 17% and 61 V. Rapid atrial pacing did not influence the internal ADFT in AF. The randomized, crossover protocol used was reproducible between different modes, and seems useful when testing the impact of different interventions on the ADFT. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. I]:1461–1466)     

Can Early Timed Internal Atrial Defibrillation Shocks Reduce the Atrial Defibrillation Threshold?

The defibrillation threshold is markedly reduced very early following the initiation of ventricular fibrillation. The purpose of this study was to determine if the same finding holds true for atrial defibrillation. Sustained, reproducible AF was induced with programmed atrial pacing using acetyl-beta-methylcholine chloride (40-640 microL/min) in six adult sheep (heart weight 245-300 g). Seven timing intervals (125 ms, 200 ms, 1 s, 3 s, 10 s, 30 s, and 5 min after AF induction) and two lead configurations: (1) RA as cathode and CS as anode; and (2) RA as cathode and RV apex as anode were tested. Single capacitor biphasic waveforms (3/1 ms) were delivered and atrial defibrillation thresholds (ADFTs) were determined in random order. No significant differences in leading edge voltage and total energy were detected for the RA-CS configuration for the seven timing intervals. For the RA-RV configuration, a significant difference was detected comparing the voltage for 125 ms to the 5-minute timing interval. For all times except 125 ms, the RA-RV threshold was significantly higher than the RA-CS level. In contrast to ventricular defibrillation, the ADFT does not change significantly within the first 5 minutes after the initiation of AF for the RA-CS configuration. However, if the shock is given very early (125 ms after AF induction) with the RA-RV configuration, the ADFT is lowered almost to the RA-CS level.     

Hemodynamic Effects and Clinical Determinants of Defibrillation Threshold for Transvenous Atrial Defibrillation Using Biatrial Biphasic Shocks in Patients with Chronic Atrial Fibrillation

We assessed the relationship between the hemodynamic changes and shock intensity in transvenous atrial defibrillation for chronic AF. The correlation between the clinical profile and atrial DFT and the factors predicting maintenance of SR after successful defibrillation were also investigated. Atrial defibrillation using entirely transvenoas leads has been investigated as an alternative means of managing patients with AF. However, the hemodynamic consequence of this technique and the clinical factors predicting defibrillation efficacy have not been evaluated. Thirty-seven patients with chronic AF (4 weeks to 60 months) underwent transvenoas atrial defibrillation. Defibrillation was performed by delivering R wave synchronized, biphasic (3/3 ms) shocks with step-up voltages (20–400 V) between defibrillation catheters in the anterolateral right atrium and the distal coronary sinus. Clinical profile of the patients, the DFT, arterial blood pressure, and RH interval during defibrillation and the 6-month recurrence rate were determined. SR was restored in 33 (89%) of 37 patients and the DFT was 3.7 ± 1.4 J (317 ± 58 V). Transvenous atrial defibrillation resulted in a mild reduction in blood pressure (6 ± 10 mmHg), but substantial prolongation of longest postshock RR intervals (507 ± 546 ms), which were significantly related to the shock intensity (r = 0.5, P < 0.001). There was no ventricular proarrhythmia. The patients'age, body weight, duration of AF, left atrial diameter, and ejection fraction were not related to the success of defibrillation, not the 6-month maintenance rate of SR (39%). However, the patients'age was related to DFT. Apart from transient reduction in blood pressure and shock related pauses that may require backup pacing, transvenous biatrial defibrillation was a highly effective and well-tolerated technique. The absence of clinical determinant for successful defibrillation suggests that restoring SR by transvenous atrial defibrillation could be attempted in most patients with chronic AF.     

The Effect of Biphasic Waveform Tilt in Transvenous Atrial Defibrillation

Atrial defibrillation can be accomplished using low energy shocks and transvenous catheters. The biphasic waveform tilt required to achieve optimal atrial defibrillation thresholds (ADFTs) is, however, not known. The effect of single capacitor biphasic waveform tilt modification on ADFT was assessed in 20 patients. Following AF induction the defibrillation pulses were delivered between the catheters positioned in the coronary sinus and the right atrium.
The single capacitor biphasic waveform shocks, delivered over the same pathways, consisted of 65% tilt (65/65 biphasic waveform) to produce an overall tilt of 88%, or 50% tilt (50/50 biphasic waveform) to produce an overall tilt of 75%. Although 65/65 biphasic waveform delivers more energy, the shorter duration 50/50 biphasic waveform reduced stored energy ADFT 21%, from 1.34 ± 0.82 J with 65/65 biphasic to 2.06 ± 0.81 J. These differences were not statistically significant. Nine patients had lower ADFT with 50/50 biphasic waveform while five patients had lower ADFT with 65/65 biphasic waveform. Equivalent reduction in ADFT was seen in the remaining six patients. The ADFT was 0.83 ± 0.65 J when both tilts were considered. In conclusion, biphasic waveform tilt modification may affect the ADFT in an individual patient. The optimal biphasic waveform for ADFT is not known.     

Capture of atrial fibrillation reduces the atrial defibrillation threshold

The effect of the atrial activity synchronization by single site right atrial pacing on atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) was investigated in patients with AF. Two series of randomized incremental cardioversion tests, with increasing energy levels from 0.5 to 10 J, were performed in 15 patients with recurrent episodes of idiopathic paroxysmal AF using two 7 Fr "single coil" catheters for internal cardioversion. After induction of sustained AF (> 10 minutes), shocks were delivered, preceded or not by 10 seconds of overdrive local atrial pacing, according to the randomization, using an external cardioverter defibrillator. A total of 187 shocks was delivered to the study population. ADFT was reduced when overdrive atrial stimulation preceded the cardioversion (3.6 +/- 1.6 vs 2.9 +/- 1.7 J, P = 0.02). Local atrial capture was considered on the basis of 1:1 phase locking between stimulus and atrial activation wave, and constant morphology of atrial wave criteria. Effective atrial capture was obtained in 8 of 15 patients. There was not significant difference in the mean of FF intervals of patients in which atrial capture was or was not stable (209 +/- 22 vs 208 +/- 28 ms). Patients were then considered according to the outcome of atrial pacing before direct current shock. A marked ADFTreduction was observed in patients with stable capture (3.8 +/- 1.7 vs 2.5 +/- 1.7 J, P = 0.0003), while no significant difference in ADFT was found when capture was not achieved (3.4 +/- 1.6 vs 3.6 +/- 1.5 J, P = NS). In conclusion, regularization of atrial electrical activity by atrial capture reduces the ADFT. A constant pacing entrainment seems to lower the energy required for electrical cardioversion by reducing the amount of fibrillating tissue.     

The Effects of Atrial Electrical Remodeling on Atrial Defibrillation Thresholds

EVERETT, T.H. et al. : The Effects of Atrial Electrical Remodeling on Atrial Defibrillation Thresholds. Electrical remodeling of atrial fibrillation may account for the increase in atrial defibrillation thresholds over time. The aim of this study was to examine the time course of electrical remodeling and the benefit of early defibrillation on the defibrillation threshold. Twenty‐six mongrel dogs weighing 27.6 ± 3.3 kg were induced into AF by repeated high output burst atrial pacing. Eight dogs were paced for multiple time periods of 5, 20, 40, and 60 minutes. Five dogs each had burst pacing for 4 hours and 8 hours, and eight dogs were paced at a high rate (640 beats/min ) for 48 hours. Biphasic atrial defibrillation shocks with a pulse width of 3/3 ms synchronized to the left apical electrogram were delivered to coil electrode catheters positioned in the lateral left and right atria. Defibrillation voltage was increased from 50 V in 20‐ to 30‐V steps until defibrillation was successful. As the pacing period increased, a decrease in atrial fibrillation cycle lengths and atrial effective refractory period was not observed before 8 hours. Similarly, the defibrillation threshold did not change significantly until the 8‐hour pacing period was reached. The defibrillation thresholds were 69 ± 28 V for 5 minutes, 64 ± 20 V for 20 minutes , 99 ± 85 V for 40 minutes , 78 ± 51 V for 60 minutes , 78 ± 38 V for 4 hours , 124 ± 33 V for 8 hours , and 133 ± 32 V for 48 hours (mean ± SD ) (P < 0.05 ). Atrial electrical remodeling in a rapid atrial pacing canine model is not observed until after 4 hours of burst atrail pacing. The atrial defibrillation threshold increases with increasing duration of burst atrial pacing, and follows a similar time course to other parameters of electrical remodeling.     

Spontaneous Reinitiation of Atrial Fibrillation Following Transvenous Atrial Defibrillation

Spontaneous reinitiation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been systematically looked at in patients undergoing transvenous AF. This study involved 11 patients, the mean age 60 ± 8 years. 3 male and 8 female, in whom transvenous atrial defibrillation successfully converted AF to sinus rhythm. Eight patients had paroxysmal AF and three patients had chronic persistent AF for 4 weeks or more. Four patients were taking antiarrhythmic medications at the time of testing. Multipolar transvenous catheters were positioned inside the coronary sinus, right atrium, and the right ventricle. Atrial defibrillation testing was performed using the METRIX atrial defibrillation system in nine patients and the Ventritex HVSO2 in the remaining two patients. A total of 64 therapeutic shocks (range 3–11) were delivered in the 11 patients, and 31 of these successfully converted AF to sinus rhythm. In four patients spontaneous AF was reinitiated following 12 successful transvenous atrial defibrillation episodes. The mean time to reinitiation of AF following shock delivery and restoration of sinus rhythm was 8.26 ± 5.25 seconds, range 1.8–19.9 seconds. All 12 episodes of spontaneous AF were preceded by a spontaneous premature atrial complex. The coupling interval of the premature atrial complexes was 443 ± 43 ms, range 390–510 ms. None of the patients taking antiarrhythmic medications or those demonstrating no premature atrial complexes had spontaneous reinitiation of AF. In conclusion, spontaneous reinitiation of AF can occur in a significant proportion of patients with AE undergoing transvenous atrial defibrillation. This phenomenon is preceded by the occurrence of atrial premature complex. Findings of this study may have significant clinical implications.(PACE 1998; 21:1105–1110)     

Significant Reduction of Atrial Defibrillation Threshold and Inducibility by Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) has antiarrhythmic effects by multiple mechanisms. We hypothesized that RFCA curtails atrial defibrillation threshold (A‐DFT) and postablation induction pacing cycle length (iPCL), making critical mass reduction one potential mechanism by which antiarrhythmic effect is achieved. Methods: We included 289 patients with AF (male 77.9%, 55.7 ± 10.8 years old; 197 paroxysmal AF: 92 persistent AF) who underwent RFCA. A‐DFT (serial internal cardioversion 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 J) and iPCL (serial 10 mA 10‐second atrial pacing with pacing cycle length 250, 200, 190, 180, 170, 160, and 150 ms) were evaluated before and after RFCA. Results: (1) RFCA of AF reduced the A‐DFT from 6.7 ± 3.7 J to 3.0 ± 3.0 J (P < 0.001). (2) AF ablation reduced AF inducibility from 95.4% before the procedure to 56.3% after the procedure (P < 0.001), and the iPCL from 194.8 ± 32.6 to 160.9 ± 26.2 ms (P < 0.001). (3) In patients who underwent a greater number of ablation lines, the post‐RFCA A‐DFT (P < 0.001) was lower, and %ΔA‐DFT (P = 0.003) and proportion of atrial tachycardia (P = 0.022) were higher than those with a lower number of ablation lines. Conclusion: AF ablation significantly reduced A‐DFT, AF inducibility, and iPCL, and the degree of their reduction was related to the number of ablation lines. (PACE 2012;35:1428–1435)     

The Effects of Reverse Atrial Electrical Remodeling on Atrial Defibrillation Thresholds

MANGRUM, J.M., et al. : The Effects of Reverse Atrial Electrical Remodeling on Atrial Defibrillation Thresholds. The implantable atrial defibrillator is a developing therapeutic option for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, but shock related discomfort continues to be a limiting factor. To further characterize successful defibrillation, the relationship between reverse atrial electrical remodeling and internal atrial defibrillation thresholds in canines with chronic atrial fibrillation was examined. Testing was performed in 21 dogs. Chronic atrial fibrillation was induced in eight dogs by creating moderate mitral regurgitation and rapidly pacing the right atrium for ≥ 6 weeks. The atrial fibrillation cycle length, atrial effective refractory period, refractory period dispersion, and internal atrial defibrillation thresholds were determined after establishment of chronic atrial fibrillation after 4 hours of sinus rhythm postcardioversion and 7 days of sinus rhythm postcardioversion. These measurements were then compared to a normal population of 13 dogs. The atrial defibrillation thresholds were 6.6 J (1.9–10.1 J) initially, 2.9 J (1.5–3.7 J) after 4 hours of sinus rhythm, and 0.9 J (0.4 – 1.3 J) after 7 days of sinus rhythm (  P = 0.04  ). This decrease was associated inversely with the atrial effective refractory period (  P < 0.03  ), and atrial fibrillation cycle length (  P < 0.05  ), and with a decrease in atrial refractory period dispersion after 7 days of sinus rhythm (  P = 0.04  ). These electrophysiological measurements reached normal population levels by 7 days. Atrial defibrillation thresholds decrease as atrial reverse electrical remodeling occurs and this reduction corresponds to increased atrial fibrillation cycle length, increased atrial refractoriness, and decreased refractory period dispersion.     

Effect of Increased Parasympathetic and Sympathetic Tone on Internal Atrial Defibrillation Thresholds in Humans

Although changes in autonomic tone affect ventricular defibrillation, little is known about the effect of increased parasympathetic or sympathetic tone on the atrial defbrillation threshold. Methods: To evaluate the effect of reflexly increased parasympathetic and increase α- and β-adrenergic tone on the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT), atrial fibrillation was induced in 14 patients. ADFTs, right atrial refractory period (RARP), and monophasic action potential duration (MAPD) were determined before and after autonomic intervention. ADFTs were determined with a step-up protocol using 3/3-ms biphasic shocks delivered through decapolar catheters in the right atrial appendage and coronary sinus. Two groups were studied. Group I (N = 8) had ADFTs determined at baseline, after receiving phenylephrine (PE), and with PE plus atropine (A). Group 2 (N = 6) had ADFTs determined at baseline and after receiving isoproterenol (ISO). Results: Group I: PE significantly increased sinus cycle length (SR-CL) compared to baseline (742 ± 123 to 922 ± 233 ms) without significantly changing RARP, MAPD, or ADFT (2.3 ± 1.3 J vs 2.3 ± 0.8 J). With PE + A, SR-CL significantly decreased (529 ± 100 ms vs 742 ± 123 ms) and MAPD shortened (231 ± 41 ms vs 279 ± 49 ms) without altering RARP or ADFT (1.94 ± 0.9 J vs 2.25 ± 1.25 J). Group 2: ISO decreased SR-CL (486 ± 77 ms vs 755 ± 184 ms) and MAPD (169 ± 37 ms vs 226 + 58 ms) but not RARP or ADFT (2.25 ± 1.21 J vs 2.33 ± 1.75 J). Conclusions: Increasing parasympathetic, α-, or β-adrenergic tone does not affect the ADFT despite causing significant electrophysiological changes in the atria.     

Dose-response relationship for successful internal atrial defibrillation

The dose-response relationship for successful defibrillation has been determined in man for the ventricle but not for the atrium. The purpose of this study was to determine the dose-response relationship for internal atrial defibrillation in humans. Seventy-seven consecutive patients underwent internal atrial defibrillation for acute (n = 14) or chronic AF (n = 63). Shocks were delivered in 40-V increments between electrodes positioned in the coronary sinus and the right atrium until successful conversion or a maximum of 400 V was reached. The shock strength versus success of shock data were subjected to a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis combined with a nonparametric probability analysis to arrive at the dose-response relationship. Using this relationship, comparisons were made between acute and chronic AF and clinical relevant conversion percentages (20, 50, 80 and 95%) were estimated and were compared with the conventional mean threshold. There were significant dose-response relationships in both patients groups (P < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier analysis comparing patients with chronic and acute AF showed significant differences in their dose-response relationships (P < 0.001). The estimated shock intensity for 95% conversion in patients with acute and chronic AF was 279 V (2.9 J) and 433 V (6.6 J), respectively (P < 0.001). The conventional mean defibrillation threshold in patients with acute (192 +/- 15 V. 1.4 +/- 0.2 J) and chronic AF (343 +/- 8 V, 4.4 +/- 0.2 J) predicted the 60% and 45% chance of successful conversion, respectively. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that single shock conversion data can be used to determine a dose-response relationship, which can be used to estimate the shock intensity required for specific successful atrial defibrillation efficacy and to compare different clinical factors that affect defibrillation efficacy.     

Preimplant Atrial Defibrillation Testing with a Temporary Catheter in Sheep

Prior to implantation of an atrial defibrillator, its effectiveness should be tested in each patient. A new catheter design for temporary use with electrodes for atrial defibrillation, electrogram sensing, and pacing was tested in this study. Atrial defibrillation thresholds defined using this temporary catheter were compared to the ones defined by catheters intended for chronic use with an implantable atrial defibrillator. Atrial defibrillation threshold was determined in six sheep using both types of catheters. Each animal was subjected to studies on 2 consecutive days. On the first day, shocks were applied between two of the temporary catheters. On the following day, permanent leads were inserted and atrial defibrillation threshold was redetermined. In both cases, defibrillation electrodes were positioned in the same heart location with one electrode in the distal coronary sinus and the second electrode in the right atrium. Atrial defibrillation threshold was obtained using 10 V increments or decrements to determine the lowest shock intensity needed to defibrillate the atria. Threshold was defined as the shock intensity at which 20 shock percent success was at or between 15 % and 85%. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference (P < 0.05) between atrial defibrillation threshold energy (0.53 J vs 0.55 J), voltage (122 V vs 120 V) or current (2.2 A vs 2.6 A) measured with the temporary catheters and the permanent leads, respectively. These data indicate that temporary catheters can be used for efficacy testing prior to implant of an atrial defibrillator, and that they predict atrial defibrillation threshold adequately for chronic leads.     

Implantation of a Dual Chamber Pacing and Sensing Single Pass Defibrillation Lead

GRADAUS, R., et al. : Implantation of a Dual Chamber Pacing and Sensing Single Pass Defibrillation Lead. Dual-chamber ICDs are increasingly used to avoid inappropriate shocks due to supraventricular tachycardias. Additionally, many ICD patients will probably benefit from dual chamber pacing. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the intraoperative performance and short-term follow-up of an innovative single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead capable of bipolar sensing and pacing in the right atrium and ventricle. Implantation of this single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead was successful in all 13 patients (  age 63 ± 8 years  ; LVEF  0.44 ± 0.16  ; New York Heart Association [NYHA]  2.4 ± 0.4  , previous open heart surgery in all patients). The operation time was  79 ± 29  minutes, the fluoroscopy time  4.7 ± 3.1  minutes. No perioperative complications occurred. The intraoperative atrial sensing was  1.7 ± 0.5 mV  , the atrial pacing threshold product was  0.20 ± 0.14 V/ms  (  range 0.03–0.50 V/ms  ). The defibrillation threshold was  8.8 ± 2.7 J  . At prehospital discharge and at 1-month and 3-month follow-up, atrial sensing was  1.9 ± 0.9, 2.1 ± 0.5, and 2.7 ± 0.6 mV  , respectively, (  P = NS, P < 0.05, P < 0.05  to implant, respectively), the mean atrial threshold product  0.79, 1.65, and 1.29 V/ms  , respectively. In two patients, an intermittent exit block occurred in different body postures. All spontaneous and induced ventricular arrhythmias were detected and terminated appropriately. Thus, in a highly selected patient group, atrial and ventricular sensing and pacing with a single lead is possible under consideration of an atrial pacing dysfunction in 17% of patients.     

Transvenous Atrial Cardioversion Threshold in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Influence of Active Pectoral Can

Recent studies have shown that transvenous atrial cardioversion is feasible with lead configurations primarily designed for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of an active pectoral ICD can on the atrial cardioversion threshold (ADFT). Forty consecutive patients received a transvenous single lead system (Endotak DSP 0125, CPI, St. Paul, MN, USA) in combination with a left subpectoral ICD (Ventak Mini, CPI) for treatment of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Patients were randomized into two groups: 21 received a Hot Can 1743 and 19 patients a Cold Can 1741. Step-down testing of the ventricular defibrillation threshold (VDFT) was performed intraoperatively and evaluation of the ADFT for induced atrial fibrillation (AF) at predischarge. After testing, each patient received a 2-J shock and was asked to quantify discomfort on a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10. Both groups were comparable with regard to all clinical parameters studied. The mean VDFT in patients with a Hot Can device was significantly lower than in patients with a Cold Can (7.5 ± 2.3 J vs 9.8 ± 3.8 J; P < 0.03). The mean ADFT in the Hot Can group tended to be lower than in the group with Cold Cans (3.4 ± 1.4 J vs 4.5 ± 2.4 J; P = 0.07), and the proportion of patients in whom atrial cardioversion was accomplished at low energies (≤ 3 J) was higher in patients with active compared with patients with inactive pulse generators (57% vs 26%; P < 0.04). The mean discomfort reported after delivery of a 2-J shock was comparable in both groups (Hot Can 5.2 ± 1.9; Cold Can: 5.3 ± 2.1; P = NS). We conclude that the inclusion of an active left subpectoral can in the defibrillation vector of a ventricular ICD seems to reduce the energy requirements for atrial cardioversion without increasing the discomfort caused by low energy shocks.     

Atrial fibrillatory frequency predicts atrial defibrillation threshold and early arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing internal cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation

This study was conducted to analyze the meaning of AF frequency obtained from the surface ECG for prediction of energy requirements and early arrhythmia relapse in patients undergoing internal cardioversion of persistent AF. Nineteen consecutive patients (mean age 58 +/- 11 years; 11 men, 8 women) with persistent AF (> 7 days) underwent internal cardioversion. A biphasic shock synchronized to the R wave was delivered between two catheters positioned in the high right atrium (HRA) and the coronary sinus (CS). AFfrequency was estimated prior to cardioversion from surface ECG lead V1. After filtering, QRST complexes were subtracted using a template matching and averaging algorithm. The resulting fibrillatory baseline signal was subjected to Fourier transformation, displayed as a frequency power spectrum and the peak frequency was determined in the 3-12 Hzfrequencyband. Atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) was determined using a step-up protocol. All patients were cardioverted successfully with a mean ADFT of 7.6 +/- 6.5 J(range 0.5-25). There was a strong positive correlation between fibrillatory frequency and ADFT (R = 0.71, P = 0.001). AF recurrence within 30 days after successful cardioversion occurred in 11 (58%) patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed a fibrillatory frequency > or = 7 Hz to be 64% sensitive and 88% specific to predict AF recurrence. It was observed in 4 (36%) of 11 cases with a fibrillatory frequency < 7 Hz, as opposed to 7 (88%) of 8 cases with a fibrillatory frequency > or = 7 Hz (P = 0.02). Fibrillatory frequency obtained from the surface ECG predicts ADFT and early AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF undergoing internal cardioversion.     

Catheter ablation approach on the right side only for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation therapy: long-term results

We report the long-term follow-up of a right side only catheter ablation approach for paroxysmal AF. Eighteen patients with AF refractory to drugs entered the study. Ablation was attempted in the right atrium only by creating linear lesions based on a specific design including from two to four linear lesions. Induction of AF was attempted before ablation and after placement of the lesions. A septal lesion was performed in nine patients. In ten patients atrial defibrillation thresholds (ADFTs) before ablation and following creation of the linear lesions were compared. After a mean follow-up of 22 +/- 11 months, seven patients had recurrence of AF, and another nine patients experienced atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia. Five patients remained in sinus rhythm without medications and four required the use of drugs. Three patients had sporadic AF and six were in chronic AF. The recurrence rate was similar in patients with and without the septal lesion. However, a cure with right side ablation appeared to be predicted by the presence of disorganized and earlier activity in the high right atrium and crista terminalis. Linear lesions in the right atrium were associated with a lower ADFT (pre 2.6 +/- 04 J vs post 1.7 +/- 0.6 J). In conclusion, in a small number of patients, control of AF can be obtained with a right side only approach. Certain activation patterns may identify patients suitable to this approach. No specific lesion pattern appeared more effective. Right atrial linear lesions resulted in lower ADFT.     

Atrial Lead Implantation During Atrial Flutter or Fibrillation?

In patients with sinoatrial disease, unexpected atrial flutter (Af) or fibrillation (AF) is a common problem during implantation of atrial-based pacing systems. As an alternative approach to blind atrial lead placement, lead positioning could be optimized by atrial electrogram mapping. It was the object of this study to evaluate if atrial lead implantation according to this approach and during ongoing arrhythmia is reasonable or if it should be postponed until restoration of sinus rhythm (SR). Twenty-nine consecutive patients (group I) with sick sinus syndrome received a dual-chamber pacemaker during an episode of Af (n = 11) or AF (n = 18). All but two atrial leads were of the screw-in type and had bipolar sensing. Atrial lead position was optimized by mapping the electrogram under fluoroscopy to find locations with high potential amplitudes. The patients were followed for 15.1 ± 9.8 months, and atrial sensing threshold (AST), atrial pulse width threshold (PWT) at 2.0 V, the pacing mode programmed, and the clinical outcome (OUT) were recorded. The control group consisted of 30 patients (group II) who equally had a history of AF or Af, but were in SR during implantation. The atrial peak-to-peak potential (APEAK) after final lead placement was lower for AF (median value 2.5 mV, lower-upper quartile: 1.7–3.1 mV) as compared to Af (3.8 mV, 2.7–4.9 mV, P < 0.05) and SR (4.1 mV, 3.3–6.2 mV, P < 0.001). There was a correlation (P < 0.01) between APEAK during Af/AF and the postoperative AST immediately after restoration of SR. No lead in any group had to be corrected due to improper sensing in the postoperative course. Median chronic AST was 2.8 mV (2.0–4.0 mV) in group I and 4.0 mV (2.8–4.0 mV) in group II. Median chronic PWT at 2.0 V was 0.15 ms (0.12–0.26 ms) in group I and 0.15 ms (0.09–0.20 ms) in group II. There was no significant difference in chronic AST and PWT between both groups. All but two patients in group I preserved SR as the basic rhythm. A stable SR was observed in 10 of 29 patients, intermittent Af/AF was documented in 17 of 29 patients, seven of whom were asymptomatic. There was no significant difference in OUT between group I and II. Hence, sinus rhythm is not a prerequisite of atrial lead implantation. Mapping the Af or AF waves appears to be useful to guide lead placement and to achieve sufficient sensing and pacing conditions after conversion to sinus rhythm.     

Internal Atrial Defibrillation During Electrophysiological Studies and Focal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedures

Induction of sustained AF during electrophysiological studies requires electrical cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm for continuation of the electrophysiological study and mapping procedure. The study included 104 consecutive patients (age 59 +/- 12 years, 74 men), who were in stable sinus rhythm at the beginning of the electrophysiological study, underwent internal atrial defibrillation (IAD) of AF (> 15 minutes) that was induced during electrophysiological study. In 21 patients, AF was regarded to be the clinical problem (group I), and in the remaining 83 patients other arrhythmias represented the primary target of the electrophysiological study (group II). A 7.5 Fr cardioversion catheter (EP Medical) equipped with a distal array was used and placed in the left pulmonary artery and a proximal array of the same size was located along the lateral right atrial wall. All patients were successfully cardioverted with a mean energy of 6.2 +/- 4.0 1. In 18 (78%) of 21 group I patients and in 12 (14%) of 81 group II patients, AF recurred 3.7 +/- 3.4 and 2.4 +/- 1.4 times during electrophysiological study, respectively. The IAD shock did not suppress focal activity, thus the mapping of atrial foci responsible for AF could be continued even after several IADs. No IAD related complications occurred during the study. In conclusion, (1) IAD can be safely and successfully performed during electrophysiological study without using narcotic drugs or high electric energies; (2) IAD does not suppress focal activity; and (3) even if AF recurs frequently during the electrophysiological study, IAD can be performed several times without significant time delay.