Efficacy of a Prophylactic Epidural Blood Patch in Preventing Post Dural Puncture Headache in Parturients after Inadvertent Dural Puncture

Background: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) occurs in up to 80% of parturients who experience inadvertent dural puncture during epidural catheter placement. The authors performed a randomized double blind study to assess the effect of prophylactic epidural blood patch on the incidence of PDPH and the need for therapeutic epidural blood patch.

Methods: Sixty-four parturients who incurred inadvertent dural puncture were randomized to receive a prophylactic epidural blood patch with 20 ml autologous blood (prophylactic epidural blood patch group) or a sham patch (sham group). Subjects were evaluated daily for development of PDPH for a minimum of 5 days after dural puncture. Those who developed a PDPH were followed daily for a minimum of 3 days after resolution of the headache. Subjects with moderate headaches who reported difficulties performing childcare activities and all those with severe headaches were advised to receive a therapeutic epidural blood patch.

Results: Eighteen of 32 subjects in each group (56%) developed PDPH. Therapeutic blood patch was recommended in similar numbers of patients in each group. The groups had similar onset time of PDPH, median peak pain scores, and number of days spent unable to perform childcare activities as a result of postural headache. The median duration of PDPH, however, was shorter in the prophylactic epidural blood patch group.     

Prophylactic vs therapeutic blood patch for obstetric patients with accidental dural puncture – a randomised controlled trial

Epidural blood patch is a standard treatment for obstetric patients experiencing a severe post‐dural puncture headache. Patients who sustained an accidental dural puncture during establishment of epidural analgesia during labour or at caesarean delivery were randomly assigned to receive a prophylactic epidural blood patch or conservative treatment with a therapeutic epidural blood patch if required. Eleven of 60 (18.3%) patients in the prophylactic epidural blood patch group developed a post‐dural puncture headache compared with 39 of 49 (79.6%) in the therapeutic epidural blood patch group (p < 0.0001). A blood patch was performed in 36 (73.4%) of patients in the therapeutic group. The number of patients who needed a second blood patch did not differ significantly between the two groups: 6 (10.0%) for prophylactic epidural blood patch and 4 (11.1%) for therapeutic epidural blood patch. We conclude that prophylactic epidural blood patch is an effective method to reduce the development of post‐dural puncture headache in obstetric patients.     

Accidental dural puncture,postdural puncture headache,intrathecal catheters,and epidural blood patch: revisiting the old nemesis

One of the controversial management options for accidental dural puncture in pregnant patients is the conversion of labor epidural analgesia to continuous spinal analgesia by threading the epidural catheter intrathecally. No clear consensus exists on how to best prevent severe headache from occurring after accidental dural puncture. To investigate whether the intrathecal placement of an epidural catheter following accidental dural puncture impacts the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and the subsequent need for an epidural blood patch in parturients. A retrospective chart review of accidental dural puncture was performed at Hutzel Women’s Hospital in Detroit, MI, USA for the years 2002–2010. Documented cases of accidental dural punctures (N = 238) were distributed into two groups based on their management: an intrathecal catheter (ITC) group in which the epidural catheter was inserted intrathecally and a non-intrathecal catheter (non-ITC) group that received the epidural catheter inserted at different levels of lumbar interspaces. The incidence of PDPH as well as the necessity for epidural blood patch was analyzed using two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. In the non-ITC group, 99 (54 %) parturients developed PDPH in comparison to 20 (37 %) in the ITC [odds ratio (OR), 1.98; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.06–3.69; P = 0.03]. Fifty-seven (31 %) of 182 patients in the non-ITC group required an epidural blood patch (EBP) (data for 2 patients of 184 were missing). In contrast, 7 (13 %) of parturients in the ITC group required an EBP. The incidence of EBP was calculated in parturients who actually developed headache to be 57 of 99 (57 %) in the non-ITC group versus 7 of 20 (35 %) in the ITC group (OR, 2.52; 95 % CI, 0.92–6.68; P = 0.07). The insertion of an intrathecal catheter following accidental dural puncture decreases the incidence of PDPH but not the need for epidural blood patch in parturients.     

Epidural morphine injections for prevention of post dural puncture headache

A prospective, randomised, double-blind trial was conducted to study the effect of epidural morphine in prevention of post dural puncture headache in 25 parturients after inadvertent dural puncture. Women were randomly allocated to receive two epidural injections, 24 h apart, of either 3 mg morphine in 10 ml saline (morphine group) or 10 ml saline (saline group). The incidence of headache and need for therapeutic epidural blood patch were reported. There was a significant difference in the incidence of headache between the two groups: 3/25 (12%) in the morphine group and 12/25 (48%) in the saline group (p = 0.014). Therapeutic epidural blood patches were required in six patients in the saline group and none of the patient in the morphine group (p = 0.022). It was concluded that epidural morphine appears to be a simple and effective technique for prevention of post dural puncture headache after accidental dural puncture in high risk obstetric patients.     

Decreased incidence of headache after unintentional dural puncture in patients with cesarean delivery administered with postoperative epidural analgesia

Purpose  To investigate how subsequent placement of a catheter into the epidural space after unintentional dural puncture for postoperative analgesia for 36–72 h affected the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Methods  The records of 52 parturients who had had accidental dural puncture in cesarean delivery were reviewed. The parturients were assigned to two groups. Twenty-eight parturients were assigned to the study group, in whom an epidural catheter was inserted and was used for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Twenty-four parturients were assigned to the control group, in whom spinal anesthesia (n = 20) or general anesthesia (n = 4) was applied. For postoperative analgesia in patients with incision pain above visual analog scale (VAS) 3, 3 mg morphine in 15 ml saline was administered through the epidural catheter in the study group, while intramuscular meperidine or tramadol was administered in the control group. Once PDPH was observed, conservative treatment was tried first. If the headache persisted despite conservative treatment, an epidural blood patch was applied through the catheter or a reinserted epidural needle. Results  The study group demonstrated significant reduction of the incidence of PDPH and reduction in the indication for an epidural blood patch compared to the control group (7.1% vs 58% [P = 0.000] and 3.6% vs 37.5% [P = 0.002], respectively). Conclusion  Subsequent catheter placement into the epidural space after unintentional dural puncture in cesarean delivery and leaving the catheter for postoperative analgesia for 36–72 h may reduce the incidence of PDPH.     

Second stage pushing correlates with headache after unintentional dural puncture in parturients

PURPOSE: To determine the association between bearing down, postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and epidural blood patch (EBP) following single 17 gauge unintentional dural puncture (UDP) in parturients. METHODS: The charts of 60 parturients identified with UDP in our institutional database during epidural placement were independently reviewed. Patients were divided into categories based on the anesthetic record: well-documented single punctures; well-documented multiple punctures; catheter-related puncture; unclear category (not clear if more than one puncture occurred or if dural puncture had occurred at all) and no evidence of dural puncture. Patients with single 17 gauge punctures were divided into those who had pushed (Group 1) and those who had not (Group 2). Group 2 patients had undergone Cesarean section before reaching second stage labour. The incidence of PDPH, EBP, and cumulative duration to delivery after UDP were compared between groups. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with well-documented single punctures were identified: 23 had engaged in active pushing as part of second stage labour (Group 1); 10 had not (Group 2). Seventy-four percent of Group1I developed PDPH compared with 10% in Group 2 (P < 0.002). Fifty-seven percent of Group 1 received an EBP compared with 0% in Group 2 (P < 0.002). Increasing the duration of pushing was associated with an increasing incidence of PDPH; the majority of women who pushed > 30 min developed headache. CONCLUSIONS: An increased incidence of PDPH and EBP after UDP occurs in women bearing down in 2nd stage labour when compared with those who never pushed. There was also an association between the cumulative duration of bearing down and the incidence of PDPH.     

Post-dural puncture headache in the parturient

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common and debilitating complications of neuraxial blockade in the parturient. The obstetric population is at particular risk with up to 80% of women developing symptoms after inadvertent dural puncture during epidural insertion. PDPH typically develops 24–48 hours post-puncture and is classically described as an occipito-frontal headache with postural features. Diagnosis and assessment should include consideration of other potential causes of post-partum headache. At the time of inadvertent dural puncture (IDP) one may insert an intrathecal catheter, re-site the epidural or use alternative analgesia. Initial treatment of a PDPH includes bed rest, adequate hydration and simple analgesics. Epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the gold standard treatment of PDPH.     

Management of postdural puncture headache

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH), a complication of regional anesthesia, is not infrequently seen in parturients because of their inherent risk from young age and female gender. With spinal anesthesia, the risk of PDPH is mainly dependent on the size and type of needle and can be reduced with the use of small-gauge, pencilpoint spinal needles. For unintentional dural puncture with epidural needles, a prophylactic epidural blood patch can reduce the risk of PDPH. Other potentially efficacious maneuvers include insertion of an intrathecal catheter and avoidance of second- stage pushing. Treatment of PDPH includes the use of caffeine or an epidural blood patch. Other pharmacologic interventions (eg, theophylline, sumatriptan, adrenocorticotropic hormone) and epidural administration of saline or dextran 40 await further investigation. The evidence for these interventions is discussed in this review. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company     

Successful treatment of a recurrent post-dural puncture headache with an epidural blood patch 18 months after the initial dural puncture

Inadvertent dural puncture is a recognised complication of epidural insertion. Parturients are at increased risk of developing a post-dural puncture headache, which can be debilitating for a mother caring for a newborn infant. Epidural blood patch is an effective treatment in patients presenting acutely with post-dural puncture headaches but its efficacy in those with delayed presentation or with late recurrent post-dural puncture headache is less clear. We present the case of a woman with a recurrent post-dural puncture headache who was successfully treated with an epidural blood patch 18 months after the initial dural puncture. Patients who develop post-dural puncture headaches may remain symptomatic for some time and an epidural blood patch may be beneficial, following appropriate investigation.     

Accidental dural puncture: Combination of prophylactic methods to avoid post-dural puncture headache

Accidental dural puncture (ADP) is a common complication of epidural catheter insertion, and may lead to post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), especially in obstetric patients. Epidural blood patch (BP) is the most effective treatment of PDPH. Prophylactic BP has shown its efficacy to prevent PDPH; nevertheless, this method may be insufficient. We report an ADP case before induction of labor in a 28-year-old parturient. To avoid PDPH, an intrathecal catheter was immediately inserted after ADP and an epidural catheter was also inserted at the interspace above. Catheters were kept in place for more than 24 hours. A prophylactic BP was performed immediately after removal of the intrathecal catheter. The patient did not experience any headache. This combination of treatments (intrathecal catheter insertion + prophylactic BP) may be a good alternative approach to prevent PDPH, even if it has to be warranted by other clinical studies.     

An audit of accidental dural puncture during epidural insertion of a Tuohy needle in obstetric patients

We report a prospective audit of 100 parturients who experienced accidental dural puncture by a Tuohy needle, while attending a tertiary referral obstetric unit during the period 1993-1999. The post dural puncture headache rate was 81% and the diagnosis of dural puncture was delayed until presentation of the headache in 27% of these cases. The incidence of unrecognised dural puncture was not influenced by the technique used for identification of the epidural space. Intraspinal opioid administration after dural puncture was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of headache (P < 0.04). There was no association between mode of delivery and post dural puncture headache. Deliberate cannulation of the subarachnoid space with an epidural catheter at the time of dural puncture, for continuous spinal analgesia or anaesthesia, did not affect the incidence of post dural puncture headache but was associated with a significantly reduced rate of epidural blood patch (43% versus 80%, P < 0.01). Of those who developed post dural puncture headache, 48% were classified 'severe' and in 49% the headache presented within 24 h of dural puncture. There was a trend to earlier onset of headache (either immediate or within 24 h) when the epidural identification technique was loss-of-resistance to air rather than saline (54% versus 33%, P = 0.07). Twenty-eight percent of those suffering from post dural puncture headache were treated expectantly and 72% received a therapeutic blood patch. Of seven parturients who received sumatriptan, six found it ineffective and five subsequently received a blood patch.     

Intracranial subdural hematoma following dural puncture in a parturient with HELLP syndrome

PURPOSE: To present a case of postpartum bilateral intracranial subdural hematoma after dural puncture during attempted epidural analgesia for labour. CLINICAL FEATURES: This complication occurred following accidental dural puncture in a parturient with thrombocytopenia (99,000 x microL-1) who subsequently developed the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets. On the first postoperative day, postdural puncture headache (PDPH) developed. An epidural blood patch (EBP) was deferred to the third postoperative day because of a platelet count of 21,000 x micro L-1. However, the headache intensified from a typical PDPH to one which was not posturally related. A second EBP was abandoned after the injection of 5 mL of blood because of increasing headache during the procedure. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed bilateral temporal subdural hematomas. The patient was managed conservatively and discharged home without any sequelae. CONCLUSION: It is conceivable that thrombocytopenia together with possible abnormal platelet function increased the risk of subdural hematoma. Alternative diagnoses to PDPH should be considered whenever headache is not posturally related.     

Impaired epidural analgesia after dural puncture with and without subsequent blood patch

We carried out a retrospective assessment of epidural analgesia in 46 parturients who had a previous dural puncture. Of 29 women who had both dural puncture and blood patch previously, only 59% had an uncomplicated successful second epidural anesthetic. Of 17 parturients who had dural puncture but no blood patch previously, only 65% had an uncomplicated successful subsequent epidural anesthetic. In comparable groups of parturients without previous dural puncture, 88%-92% had successful epidural analgesia. The data suggest that dural puncture may lead to impaired epidural analgesia subsequently. Epidural blood patch after dural puncture did not lead to any further decrease in the rate of good analgesia with subsequent epidural anesthetics. Parturients who request epidural analgesia and who have had previous dural puncture with or without blood patch should be informed about the 35%-40% chance of poor epidural analgesia.     

Epidural blood patch for management of postdural puncture headache in adolescents

BACKGROUND: In some patients spinal puncture (SP) is followed by postdural puncture headache (PDPH). When the symptoms of PDPH are severe and are not relieved within a few days an epidural blood patch (EBP) might be performed. The aim of this survey was to review requests for EBPs and to evaluate the effectiveness of EBP in patients aged 13-18 years during a 6.5 year period ending in June 2001. METHODS: The Information System Patient Measures Database was interrogated to identify patients who were referred for EBP. After identification, the patients' medical records were reviewed in detail for the characteristics of PDPH and other symptoms, and for the effectiveness of the EBP. RESULTS: Forty-two EBPs were performed after 40 SPs on 37 patients (24 girls, 13 boys). Epidural blood patches were performed twice in five patients. The reasons for repeating the procedure were repeat SP with new PDPH in three patients and an unsatisfactory effect in two patients. Twenty-eight of the 40 spinal punctures (70%) had been performed for diagnostic use and 10 (25%) for spinal anesthesia. Two patients (5%) developed PDPH after inadvertent dural puncture with an epidural needle. In 37 cases the criteria for PDPH were fulfilled, and one patient had a cerebrospinal fluid fistula headache. Two-thirds of the girls had associated symptoms of headache compared with one-third of the boys. Epidural blood patch was performed 1-22 days after SP with 0.2 ml/kg (mean) of autologous blood injected into the epidural space. The success rate of the first injection was 37 out of 40 EBP (93%), and the second injection was effective in both patients with recurred PDPH. CONCLUSION: Epidural blood patch seems to be an effective and safe procedure in adolescents for treating severe and persistent PDPH.     

Decreased incidence of headache after accidental dural puncture in caesarean delivery patients receiving continuous postoperative intrathecal analgesia

To examine the effects of prolonged (> 24 h) intrathecal catheterization with the use of postoperative analgesia on the incidence of post–dural puncture headache (PDPH), charts of 45 obstetric patients who had accidental dural puncture following attempts at epidural block were reviewed retrospectively. Three groups were identified: Group I (n = 15) patients had a dural puncture on the first attempt at epidural block, but successful epidural block on a repeated attempt; Group II (n=17) patients had a dural puncture with immediate conversion to continuous spinal anaesthesia with catheterization lasting only for the duration of caesarean delivery; Group III (n= 13) patients had an immediate conversion to spinal anaesthesia and received post–caesarean section continuous intrathecal patient–controlled analgesia consisting of fentanyl 5 (ig'ml^-1 with bupivacaine 0.25 mg·ml^-1 and epinephrine 2 μg·ml^-1 with catheterization lasting >24 h. No parturient in group III developed a PDPH. This was substantially lower ( P < 0.009) than the 33% incidence for group I and the 47% incidence for group II. The incidence of a PDPH did not differ between group I and II. Similarly, there was no difference between group I and II with regard to requests for a blood patch. Patients receiving continuous intrathecal analgesia had excellent pain relief, could easily ambulate and none complained of pruritus, nausea, vomiting, sensory loss or weakness. In conclusion, indwelling spinal catheterization > 24 h with continuous intrathecal analgesia following accidental dural puncture in parturients may for some patients be a suitable method for providing PDPH prophylaxis and postoperative analgesia.     

The injection of intrathecal normal saline reduces the severity of postdural puncture headache

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the injection of 10 mL of normal saline into the subarachnoid space following accidental dural puncture reduced the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and the need for epidural blood patch (EBP). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients who experienced accidental dural puncture with an epidural needle had 10 mL of normal saline injected into the subarachnoid space. In 22 patients, the injection was performed immediately through the epidural needle. In 6 patients who had intrathecal catheters placed through the epidural needle, the saline was injected through the catheter before removal. All other patients who experienced wet taps during the same period that the study was in progress but did not receive the saline injection served as a control group, 26 in number. Patients with severe or persistent PDPHs were treated with EBP. RESULTS: Of those patients who received intrathecal normal saline immediately through the epidural needle, 32% developed a headache compared with 62% of controls. Of these, 1 patient who received saline required EBP compared with nine in the control group (P =.004). Of those patients who had intrathecal catheters placed, there were no headaches in the saline group of 6 compared with 3 in the control group of 5, 1 of whom was treated with EBP (P >.05). CONCLUSIONS: The immediate injection of 10 mL intrathecal normal saline after a wet tap significantly reduced the incidence of PDPH and the need for EBP. When an intrathecal catheter had been placed following a wet tap, injection of 10 mL of normal saline before its removal effectively prevented PDPH.     

Needle bevel direction and headache after inadvertent dural puncture

To study the effect of needle bevel direction on the incidence and severity of headache following inadvertent dural puncture occurring during the identification of the epidural space, the authors randomly assigned obstetric anesthesia residents to identify epidural space with the bevel of the epidural needle oriented either parallel or perpendicular to the longitudinal dural fibers. If dural puncture occurred, an observer unaware of the needle bevel direction, daily assessed the presence and severity of any subsequent headache. Of the 1,558 women who received epidural analgesia during this study, 41 women suffered dural puncture, 20 with the needle bevel oriented perpendicular to the longitudinal dural fibers and 21 with the needle bevel inserted parallel to the dural fibers (NS). Fourteen of 20 women in the group in which the needle bevel was perpendicular to dural fibers developed a moderate to severe headache, whereas only five of 21 in the group in which the needle bevel was parallel to dural fibers did so (P less than 0.005). Similarly, we administered a therapeutic blood patch to ten of 20 women in the perpendicular group but to only four of 21 in the parallel group (P less than 0.05). Thus, identifying the epidural space with the needle bevel oriented parallel to the longitudinal dural fibers limits the size of the subsequent dural tear and, therefore, lowers the incidence of headache should dural perforation occur.     

Epidural pressure and postdural puncture headache in the parturient

Forty patients in whom the dura had been punctured accidentally and 10 patients who had received spinal anaesthesia required epidural blood patching for relief of severe postdural puncture headache (PDPH). Before injecting blood, the epidural pressure was measured, using an epidural catheter as a manometer. Mean epidural pressure in the left lateral position was 6.4 cm H(2)O (range 0.5-12 cm H(2)O). Epidural pressure was not related to the size of needle hole or prophylactic infusion of saline into the epidural space. In 5 patients with inadvertent dural tap, there was a statistically significant decrease (P<0.02) in epidural pressure from 14.9 cm H(2)O (range 11-22 cm H(2)O) before PDPH to 6.9 cm H(2)O (range 5-8.5 cm H(2)O) when they developed PDPH. The benefits of performing an epidural blood patch through a catheter placed in the epidural space are discussed.     

An audit of epidural blood patch after accidental dural puncture with a Tuohy needle in obstetric patients

We report the results of a prospective audit of accidental dural puncture in 100 obstetric patients in a single tertiary referral institution during the period 1993 to 1999. The post dural puncture headache rate was 81%. Of the 81 parturients with post dural puncture headache, 58 (72%) received a therapeutic epidural blood patch, using 7 to 25 mL of autologous blood. After the initial blood patch, complete relief of headache was obtained in 67% and complete or partial relief in 95%. However, severe headache returned in 31% and 28% received more than one blood patch. The incidence of complete relief of headache with one blood patch or more was 50%, with 38% achieving partial relief and 12% having unrelieved headache. There was no significant association between volume of blood used for blood patch and success rate. The initial rate of resolution of headache did not differ significantly between parturients receiving a blood patch within 48 h of dural puncture and after 48 h (P =0.70). However, in the former group, the incidence of recurrent headache was significantly higher (59% versus 11%, P<0.001).     

Prevention of post‐dural puncture headache in parturients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Post‐dural puncture headaches (PDPHs) present an important clinical problem. We assessed methods to decrease accidental dural punctures (ADPs) and interventions to reduce PDPH following ADP. Multiple electronic databases were searched for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of parturients having labour epidurals, in which the studied intervention could plausibly affect ADP or PDPH, and the incidence of at least one of these was recorded. Forty RCTs (n = 11,536 epidural insertions) were included, studying combined spinal–epidurals (CSEs), loss of resistance medium, prophylactic epidural blood patches, needle bevel orientation, ultrasound‐guided insertion, epidural morphine, Special Sprotte needles, acoustic‐guided insertion, administration of cosyntropin, and continuous spinal analgesia. The RCTs for CSE, loss of resistance medium, and prophylactic epidural blood patches were meta‐analysed. Five methods reduced PDPH: prophylactic epidural blood patch {four trials, median quality score = 2, risk difference = ?0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI): ?0.88 to ?0.086]}, lateral positioning of the epidural needle bevel upon insertion (one trial, quality score = 1), Special Sprotte needles [one trial, quality score = 5, risk difference = ?0.44 (95% CI: ?0.67 to ?0.21)], epidural morphine [one trial, quality score = 4, risk difference = ?0.36 (95% CI ?0.59 to ?0.13)], and cosyntropin [one trial, quality score = 5, risk difference = ?0.36 (95% CI ?0.55 to ?0.16)]. Several methods potentially reduce PDPH. Special Sprotte needles, epidural morphine, and cosyntropin are thus far each supported by a single, albeit good quality trial. Prophylactic blood patches are supported by three trials, but these had flawed methodology. Mostly, trials were of limited quality, and further well‐conducted, large studies are needed.