A comparison of three anesthetic techniques in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery

Several anesthetic techniques have been used successfully to provide anesthesia for resection of intracranial supratentorial mass lesions. One technique used to enhance recovery involves changing anesthesia from vapor-based to propofol-based for cranial closure. However, there are no data to support a beneficial effect of this approach in the immediate postoperative period after craniotomy. We evaluated 3 anesthetic techniques in 60 patients undergoing elective surgery for supratentorial mass lesions. Patients were randomly assigned to three anesthesia study groups: propofol infusion, isoflurane inhalation, and these two techniques combined. In the combination group, once the dura was closed, isoflurane was discontinued and propofol infusion simultaneously started. We studied intra- and postoperative hemodynamics and several recovery variables for 2 h after the end of anesthesia. Baseline and average intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate values did not differ among the groups. Heart rate and blood pressure increased similarly in all groups in response to intubation and pin placement and postoperatively. None of the recovery event times (open eyes, extubation, follow commands, oriented, Aldrete score) or psychomotor test performance differed significantly. We conclude that the sequential administration of isoflurane and propofol did not provide earlier recovery and cognition than the intraoperative use of isoflurane alone. IMPLICATIONS: We evaluated three anesthetic techniques with and without propofol in patients undergoing elective surgery for supratentorial mass lesions by using a prospective, randomized clinical study design and found that the three anesthetics did not differ in intra- or postoperative hemodynamic stability or early postoperative recovery variables.     

Remifentanil vs fentanyl with a target controlled propofol infusion in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial lesions

AIM: Remifentanil hydrochloride is an ultra-short acting m-opioid receptor agonist. This study compared the use of remifentanil with that of fentanyl during elective supratentorial craniotomy in a target controlled infusion (TCI)-propofol anesthesia regimen and evaluated the quality of recovery from anesthesia. METHODS: After written informed consent for this prospective study, 40 adult patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: in group F analgesia was provided with fentanyl 2-3 mg kg(-1) h(-1) and in group R with remifentanil 0.25 mg kg(-1) h(-1). Anesthesia was induced with thiopental and pancuronium bromide, and maintained with propofol-TCI, pancuronium, air and oxygen and fentanyl (group F) or remifentanil (group R), respectively. After tracheal intubation, infusion rate of remifentanil was reduced and then adjusted to maintain stable hemodynamics. Hemodynamics and recovery time were monitored for 60 min after surgery. Analgesic requirements, propofol intraoperative consumption, nausea and vomiting in postoperative period were monitored. Recovery was evaluated according to a modified Aldrete score. RESULTS: Baseline hemodynamics were similar in both groups. Mean arterial pressure differed between the 2 groups (P<0.05) with the greatest decrease in group R during dura opening (P<0.001). Postoperative mean arterial pressure was higher in group R. Patients in group R exhibited a faster recovery. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was similar in the 2 groups. Noteworthy, there was a reduction in the amount of propofol used in group R. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil appears to be a reasonable alternative to fentanyl during elective surgery of supratentorial lesions.     

Effect of prophylactic ondansetron on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients on preoperative steroids undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumors

The exact incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients on steroids undergoing neurosurgical procedures is not known. This prospective randomized double-blind study was planned to know the efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron in the prevention of PONV in patients on steroids as compared with placebo. Seventy adult patients of either sex who had received preoperative steroids (dexamethasone) for at least 24 hours and were scheduled to undergo craniotomy for supratentorial tumors were included. Patients were randomly allocated using a randomization chart to 1 of the 2 groups to receive either ondansetron 4 mg (group O) or 0.9% saline (group S) intravenously at the time of dural closure. Numeric Rating Scale score for nausea and pain intensity was recorded preoperatively and till 24 hours postoperatively. The 6-hour postoperative nausea score was significantly lower in group O [median, 0; interquartile range (IQR), 0 to 20] than in group S (median, 20; IQR, 0 to 20) (P<0.05). The incidence of vomiting was lower in group O (23%) than in group S (46%) (P<0.05). The total number of emetic episodes, the number of doses of rescue antiemetics given in the first 6 postoperative hours, and the total number of rescue antiemetics given were significantly lower in group O than in group S (P<0.05). Intravenous administration of 4 mg of ondansetron at the time of dural closure was effective in reducing the incidence of PONV and the rescue antiemetics requirement in patients on preoperative steroids undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumors.     

The comparative effects of desflurane and isoflurane on lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumors

We compared the effects of desflurane and isoflurane on cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure (LCSFP), and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) in patients anesthetized with desflurane or isoflurane undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial mass lesions. Additionally, emergence from anesthesia was examined to determine if neurologic function could be assessed earlier after isoflurane or desflurane anesthesia. Thirty-six patients were randomized to receive either desflurane or isoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia at 1.2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). Patients were hyperventilated (PaCO(2), 30 +/- 2 mm Hg) after baseline LCSFP was obtained via the subarachnoid catheter. At a MAC of 1.2, mean LCSFP was not statistically different between the two study groups either before or after hyperventilation. Additionally, CPP was not significantly different between the two groups. Finally, patient's time to respond to commands was 50% shorter in the desflurane group (30 +/- 36 min) (mean +/- SD) when compared with the isoflurane group (72 +/- 126 min); however, this was not significant (P = 0.17). In patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial mass lesions, desflurane and isoflurane have similar effects on CPP and MAP. Additionally, desflurane in the setting of hyperventilation does not cause significant changes in LCSFP. IMPLICATIONS: This is the largest study to date comparing the effects of desflurane and isoflurane on patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial mass lesion with evidence of midline shift or edema. Neither desflurane nor isoflurane significantly altered lumbar cerebrospinal fluid pressure when moderate hypocapnia was maintained.     

No difference in emergence time and early cognitive function between sevoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-remifentanil in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery

Balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane-fentanyl has been widely accepted as anesthetic management for neurosurgery. Propofol-remifentanil regimen has been successfully used in various surgical settings, but a comprehensive comparison of sevoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery has not yet been done. The aim of this prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial was to compare clinical properties of sevoflurane-fentanyl with propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing supratentorial intracranial surgery. The primary endpoint was to compare early postoperative recovery and cognitive functions within the two groups; we also evaluated hemodynamic events, vomiting, shivering, and pain. One hundred twenty patients (64 males; age 15-75 years) were randomized to either total intravenous anesthesia (group T) or sevoflurane anesthesia (group S). Emergence and extubation times and cognitive function (Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test [SOMCT]) were compared in the two groups. Brain swelling, incidence of hypotensive and hypertensive episodes, postoperative vomiting, shivering, and pain were also analyzed. The mean emergence time (12.2 +/- 4.9 minutes for group S versus 12.3 +/- 6.1 minutes for group T; P = 0.92) and extubation time (18.2 +/- 2.3 minutes for group S versus 18.3 +/- 2.1 minutes for group T; P = 0.80) were similar in the two groups. Average SOMCT scores, both 15 minutes after extubation (25.6 +/- 4.9 in group S versus 23.9 +/- 7.5 in group T; P = 0.14) and 45 minutes after extubation (27.3 +/- 2.2 in group S versus 26.0 +/- 5.1 in group T; P = 0.07) were also comparable. Brain swelling was present in seven and five patients in groups S and T, respectively (P = 0.76). Hypotension was present in 12% (group S) and 28% (group T) of patients (P = 0.02). Hypertension was present in 17% of patients in group S and 40% of patients in group T (P = 0.0046). Shivering was present in 18% and 25% of patients in groups T and S (P = 0.37). Our study demonstrates that there is no patient benefit of using total intravenous anesthesia with an ultra-short-acting opioid over the conventional balanced volatile technique in terms of recovery and cognitive functions.     

Erratum to: Same-day discharge after craniotomy for supratentorial tumour surgery: a retrospective observational single-centre study

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie -     

The effects of midazolam on cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption Interaction with nitrous oxide in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial cerebral tumours

Cerebral blood flow and the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen were measured in 30 patients during craniotomy for supratentorial cerebral tumours by a modification of the Kety-Schmidt technique using Xenon 133 intravenously. Anaesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.3 mg/kg, fentanyl and pancuronium, and maintained with midazolam as a continuous infusion, fentanyl, pancuronium and nitrous oxide in oxygen or oxygen in air. The concentration of midazolam in the blood of 10 patients was about 300 ng/litre during two measurements; the patients' lungs were ventilated with N2O in oxygen. The concentration of midazolam in the blood of another 10 patients was doubled to about 600 ng/litre during the second flow measurement; the patients' lungs were ventilated with N2O/O2. The concentration of midazolam in the blood of the third group of 10 patients was doubled to 600 ng/litre during the second flow measurement; the patients' lungs were ventilated with oxygen in air. No relationship was found between the dose of midazolam and cerebral blood flow or oxygen consumption. Nitrous oxide in combination with midazolam also had no effect on these variables.     

Changes in plasma phenytoin level following craniotomy

Phenytoin is often used to prevent postcraniotomy seizures, but is not always effective. We investigate changes in plasma phenytoin level ([phenytoin]) following craniotomy. The [phenytoin] in 28 patients who were receiving phenytoin (oral/ intravenous) and undergoing a craniotomy were prospectively measured 24 h preoperatively, immediately pre- and postcraniotomy, 24 and 48 h postoperatively. Factors examined included patients' age, sex, pathology, preoperative [phenytoin], operative duration and blood loss. Fifteen patients had [phenytoin] concentrations outside the therapeutic range. Twenty-five patients experienced a decrease in [phenytoin] immediately postcraniotomy: pre-, post- and 24 h postcraniotomy mean [phenytoin] were 13.4, 10.0 and 12.9 mg/l, respectively. Preoperative [phenytoin], operative duration and blood loss had significant correlation with the decrease in [phenytoin] (p < 0.05). In conclusion, < 50% of the patients had therapeutic preoperative [phenytoin]. In most patients, [phenytoin] decreases by 26% after craniotomy and returns to preoperative level within 24 h. These may contribute to early postoperative seizure development.     

Optimal reverse trendelenburg position in patients undergoing craniotomy for cerebral tumors

OBJECT: To the authors' knowledge, repeated measurements of intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and the degree of dural tension during different positions on the operating table (reverse Trendelenburg position [rTp]) have not been studied in patients undergoing craniotomy. METHODS: In the present study 53 patients with supratentorial cerebral tumors who underwent craniotomy in the supine position were included. Subdural ICP, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), CPP, and jugular bulb (JB) pressure were recorded, and the degree of dural tension was analyzed while patients were in the neutral operating position and at 5, 10, and 15 degrees rTp. The optimal operating position was defined as the one at which subdural ICP was as low as possible, and CPP was greater than or equal to 60 mm Hg or as high as possible. Subdural ICP, MABP, and JB pressure decreased significantly after each 5 degrres change in rTp compared with the preceding position. Dural tension decreased significantly up to 10 degrees rTp, but was unchanged at 15 degrees rTp. At 5 degrees rTp CPP remained unchanged, but it decreased significantly during 10 and 15 degrees rTp. The optimal position in the majority of patients was determined to be 15 degrees rTp. CONCLUSIONS: Before opening the dura mater for craniotomy, repeated measurements of ICP and CPP, in the neutral position and at 5, 10, and 15 degrees rTp, provide valuable information regarding the optimal level of ICP and CPP.     

Perioperative deep vein thrombosis in Chinese patients undergoing craniotomy

BACKGROUND: We attempted to determine the incidence of perioperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in Chinese patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumors and to assess the efficacy of clinical and serial calf circumference assessment in detecting DVT. METHODS: Between June 1999 and February 2001, 100 consecutive patients who underwent elective craniotomy for brain tumors at the Department of Neurosurgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre were examined for perioperative DVT. The demographic data, Glasgow coma score (GCS), mobility status, and the operative details were recorded. Graduated compression stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression were applied perioperatively as prophylaxis against DVT. Serial duplex scans were performed before and after operation. Clinical examination was also performed daily to look for signs of DVT. The calf circumference was measured at fixed levels for both limbs before each duplex scan surveillance. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 44 males and 56 females, with a mean age of 54 +/- 15 years (range, 20-81 years). There was no preoperative DVT. Postoperative DVT was detected on duplex scan in four patients (4%), two of whom had bilateral involvement. The thrombosis was confined to the calf veins in two limbs. The demographic data, neurologic status and operative details of patients with and without DVT were similar. Patients with DVT had no clinically recognizable signs. The change in calf circumference measurement was also not predictive of DVT. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of perioperative DVT in Chinese patients undergoing elective craniotomy for brain tumors appears to be low with the present mechanical prophylactic measures. Given the low incidence of proximal DVT as detected by duplex scan, the use of heparin prophylaxis may not be justified because of the increased risk of intracranial bleeding. Clinical assessment with calf circumference measurement is unreliable in the diagnosis of DVT.     

Remifentanil-propofol versus sufentanil-propofol anaesthesia for supratentorial craniotomy: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Remifentanil has unique pharmacokinetics that might allow faster recovery after neurosurgery. We investigated the effects of a propofol/sufentanil versus a remifentanil/propofol regimen on the primary end-point tracheal extubation time. METHODS: In the Neurosurgery Department of a University Hospital, 36 patients awaiting craniotomy for supratentorial tumour resection were randomly assigned to one of two study groups. In the sufentanil/propofol group, anaesthesia was induced with 0.5 microg kg(-1) sufentanil and 1-2 mg kg(-1) propofol. Propofol infusion and boluses of sufentanil were administered for maintenance. In the remifentanil/propofol group, anaesthesia was started with an infusion of remifentanil (0.2-0.35 microg kg(-1) min(-1)) and a bolus of propofol (1.5-2 mg kg(-1)). Patients received a propofol infusion and a remifentanil infusion for maintenance of anaesthesia. Recovery times were taken from cessation of the propofol infusion. In addition, data about self-reported nausea and vomiting, pain and analgesic requirements were collected. RESULTS: Patients in the remifentanil/propofol group were extubated earlier (mean times 6.4 (+/- SD 4.7) versus 14.3 (+/- 9.2) min; P = 0.003). The two groups were similar with respect to postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient-reported pain scores. Fifty per cent of the remifentanil/propofol patients and 88% of the sufentanil/propofol patients required no analgesics within 1 h after operation (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The remifentanil/propofol regimen provided quicker recovery. The two regimens were similar in terms of postoperative nausea and vomiting and patient-reported pain scores, but patients in the remifentanil/ propofol group required more analgesics within 1 h postoperatively.