Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, several adhesives have been proposed for bonding fiber posts into root canals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of four adhesive procedures in resin tag, adhesive lateral branch and resin dentin interdiffusion zone (RDIZ) formation when used to bond fiber posts. METHOD: Forty anterior teeth, extracted for periodontal reasons and endodontically treated, were selected for this study. The samples were randomly divided into four groups of ten samples each. Group 1: One Step applied with the small brush provided by the manufacturer and LC (Light-cured before resin cement application)+Dual Link resin cement; Group 2: One Step applied with a thin microbrush LC+Dual Link resin cement; Group 3: One Step applied with a small brush (Not light-cured)+Dual Link resin cement; Group 4: All Bond 2+C & B resin cement (as control). In Group 2 and 4 the adhesive system and resin cement were used strictly following manufacturers' instructions. In Group 1, One Step was applied using a thin microbrush, while in the other groups by a small brush. In Group 1 and 2 the priming-adhesive solution of the "one-bottle" system was light-cured before placing the resin cement and the post, whereas in Group 3 the adhesive/resin cement combination was light cured through the translucent post. Forty translucent posts (RTD, France) were used. A week later, the root samples were processed for SEM observations. RESULTS: Microscopic examination of restored interfaces of Group 1 showed a higher % (P<0.05) of RDIZ than those found in samples of Group 2, 3 and 4. In Group 2, 3 and 4 samples RDIZ morphology was well detectable and uniform in the first two thirds of root canals while in the apical third the RDIZ was not uniformly present. No statistically significant differences were found among the groups coronally, whereas apical and middle thirds of Group 1 showed significantly more resin tags than the other three Groups. In the apical third of Group 2, 3 and 4 samples, the resin tags showed a less uniform morphology and a shorter length than those found in the other two thirds. SIGNIFICANCE: A microbrush might clinically be used for bonding fiber posts into the root canal. When a microbrush was used, the bonding mechanism created between root canal dentin and bonding system was uniform along canal walls and more predictable.     

Influence of a microbrush on bonding fiber post into root canals under clinical conditions

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this clinical report was to evaluate the effectiveness of a microbrush as a carrier of priming-adhesive solution in formation of resin tags, adhesive lateral branches, and resin-dentin interdiffusion zone (RDIZ) when the brush was used to bond fiber posts under clinical conditions. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty endodontically treated teeth, already scheduled for extraction for endodontic or periodontal reasons, were selected for this study. The patients were informed, and their written consent was obtained. The samples were randomly divided into 2 groups of 10 samples each. In group 1, One-Step (Bisco, Schaumburg, Ill) was applied with a brush with Duo-Link resin cement (Bisco). In group 2, One-Step was applied with a microbrush with Duo-Link resin cement (Bisco). Use of the adhesive systems and resin cements was strictly according to manufacturers' instructions. The priming-adhesive solution was light-cured before the dual resin cement and the post were placed. Twenty Aestheti-Plus posts (white quartz fiber posts; RTD, St. Egreve, France) were used. A week after application, the root samples were extracted and processed for SEM observations. RESULTS: Both adhesive systems showed RDIZ and resin tag and adhesive lateral branch formation. In Group 2 samples, RDIZ morphology was easily detectable and uniform along root canals. Also, resin tag formation was well represented in all thirds. In group 1 samples, resin tag formation at the apical third and RDIZ formation was less evident. Statistically significant differences were found among the two groups at the apical third. CONCLUSION: The microbrush permitted a more uniform RDIZ and resin tag formation along the entire length of the canal than did the standard brush. The microbrush can be routinely used for bonding fiber posts into root canal preparations.     

A one step procedure for luting glass fibre posts: an SEM evaluation

AIM: To evaluate the ability of two luting procedures for bonding translucent fibre posts to form resin tags, adhesive lateral branches, and resin dentine interdiffusion zones (RDIZ). METHODOLOGY: Forty root filled teeth, extracted for periodontal reasons, were selected for the study. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 10 each. Group 1: One Step, light-cured (LC) 20 s + dual link resin cement (LC 20 s); group 2: One Step, not light-cured (NLC) + dual link resin cement (LC 30 s); group 3: One Step (NLC) + dual link resin cement (LC 60 s); group 4: One Step (NLC) + dual link resin cement (LC 90 sec). Forty translucent fibre posts (DT posts, RTD) were inserted. Then, root specimens were processed for scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations to assess the continuity of the RDIZ, the presence or absence of gaps and the density and morphology of resin tags using a four-step scale method. RESULTS: With all luting procedures the formation of a RDIZ occurred. However, the microscopic examination of adhesive interfaces revealed that the percentage of RDIZ was significantly higher in group 1 than in the other three groups (P < 0.05). Group 4 had a higher percentage of RDIZ than group 3, which in turn exhibited a greater percentage than group 2, but these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Resin tag formation was evident in all the groups. The characteristic reverse cone shape of resin tags was always noted in the coronal and middle third of all groups, and in the apical third of group 1. In the apical third a shorter length and a less uniform appearance of resin tags were noted in groups 2, 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: In this laboratory study, when bonding a translucent fibre post into a root canal, the luting procedure including light curing of the adhesive solution before the placement of the cement was more satisfactory, from a SEM standpoint, than the procedure involving the simultaneous curing of adhesive and cement (one step procedure).     

Comparison between two clinical procedures for bonding fiber posts into a root canal: a microscopic investigation

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of two brushes used as carriers of a primer-adhesive solution as to the formation of resin tags, adhesive lateral branches, and a hybrid layer when used to bond translucent fiber posts. Twenty endodontically treated teeth, extracted for periodontal reasons, were used. The samples were randomly divided into two groups of 10 samples each (Group 1: Microbrush + Scotchbond 1 + Rely X ARC resin cement; Group 2: small plastic brush + Scotchbond 1 + Rely X ARC resin cement). The adhesive system and resin cement were used strictly following manufacturers' instructions. The priming-adhesive solution of the one-bottle system was light-cured before placing the resin cement and the post. Twenty translucent fiber posts were used. After luting procedures, root samples were processed for SEM observations. The adhesive system showed a resin dentin interdiffusion zone (RDIZ), resin tag, and adhesive lateral branch formation. Microscopic examination of restored interfaces of group 1 showed a higher percentage (p < 0.05) of RDIZ than those found in samples of group 2. In group 1 samples, RDIZ morphology was well detectable and uniform in all thirds of the root canals. In group 2, RDIZ was not visible in the apical third. No statistically significant differences were found among the two groups coronally and at the middle third, but the apical third of group 1 showed significantly more resin tag formation than group 2. The characteristic reverse cone shape of resin tags was always noted in the coronal and middle third of the root canals of both groups and in the apical third of group 1. In the apical third of group 2 root canals, the resin tags showed a less uniform morphology and a shorter length than those found in the other observed thirds.     

Clinical behavior of translucent-fiber posts: a 2-year prospective study

PURPOSE: This study prospectively evaluated the clinical performance of three types of translucent posts over a follow-up period of between 2 and 3 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Selected were 225 patients with one premolar in need of endodontic treatment, followed by restoration with a fiber post and porcelain crown. The sample was randomly divided into three groups of 75 patients each. The same type of post was used in all patients within a group: group 1 = Aesthetic Plus; group 2 = DT; and group 3 = FRC Postec. For bonding the post, a light-curing adhesive (One-Step) and a dual-curing resin cement (Duo-Link) were applied in group 1 and 2 roots, whereas self-curing materials (Excite DSC as adhesive and MultiLink as resin cement) were used in group 3. After 6, 12, and 24 months, patients were recalled, and a clinical and radiographic examination was performed. For some patients, 30-month follow-up data were also collected. RESULTS: Debonding of the post occurrred in eight cases (3.5%); in another six cases, a recurrence of the periapical lesion was reported. CONCLUSION: The statistical analysis did not reveal any significant difference in the survival rate of the tested posts, suggesting that all are equally and sufficiently reliable for clinical use.     

Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system.

OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to observe the efficacy of two different composite cements on the prevention of marginal deterioration around adhesive ceramic inlay restorations, under laboratory conditions, and to test the null hypothesis that different luting procedures cannot affect sealing ability of luted inlays. METHODS: Twenty-six standardized mesio-occlusal Class II cavities were prepared in extracted posterior teeth. Class II inlays were fabricated with IPS Empress II system following the manufacturer's instructions. The samples were divided into two groups of 13 teeth each at random. Group 1: The ceramic inlays of Group 1 were luted using Excite DSC and an experimental self-curing resin cement (Multilink, Vivadent); in this group, Excite DSC was self-activated and not light-cured. Group 2: Excite DSC in combination with a dual-curing resin cement (Variolink II, Vivadent) was used (as control). In this group Excite DSC was light-cured for 20s separately, before resin cement application. The 'wet' bonding technique was followed. Three samples of each group were selected at random for SEM observations, while the other 10 samples were processed for marginal leakage. The bonding mechanism to dentin and resin cement thickness was evaluated. RESULTS: Samples of both groups showed resin tag and adhesive lateral branch formation. In Group 1 the hybrid layer was mainly uniform along the interface between dental substrates and adhesive material, and resin cement thickness was between 20 and 85 microm. At the cervical margin no gap was detected. In Group 2 the cement thickness was between 30 and 110 microm and hybrid layer formation was observed along the interface but at the cervical margin it was not always uniform and continuous. Resin tag formation was uniform in both groups. At cervical margins, 80% of Group 1 samples showed a perfect seal at the dentin-cementum margins, and 90% at enamel margins. Group 2 samples showed only 50% of cervical margins free from leakage and 80% at the occlusal enamel margins. Statistically significant differences were found at cervical margins between the two groups, while no significant differences were found at enamel site.CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that the self-curing adhesive-resin cement combination can properly seal Class II porcelain inlays.     

Morphological study of fiber-reinforced post-bonding system-root dentin interface by evaluation of two bonding systems

Morphological study of fiber post/bonding system/root dentin interface by evaluation of two bonding systems. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyze the interfaces, and thus the seal, between root dentin and bonded fiber-reinforced posts. The interfaces were obtained by applying two enamel-dentin adhesive systems, a one-bottle system used after application of phosphoric acid and a self-etch system, both used with an adhesive cement. The interface was evaluated by SEM observation of the continuity of the hybrid layer and the morphology of the resin tags, in terms of length, density and presence of side branches, at the interface between the fiber-reinforced post, the bonding system and the root dentin. METHODS: Twenty-six anterior single-rooted teeth extracted for periodontal reasons were treated endodontically and then randomly separated into two groups of 13 teeth each: group 1: Excite DSC (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein); group 2: AdheSE DC (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). After preparation of the root canal and application of the adhesive, each specimen received a Postec translucent FRC post (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) that was cemented in with Variolink II dual-curing luting composite (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). The specimens were then prepared for SEM observation of the continuity of the hybrid layer and scoring of the morphology of the resin tags in each third of the root (at 1, 4.5 and 8mm from the coronal surface). RESULTS: There was no significant difference (at p<0.05) between the two groups in terms of continuity of the hybrid layer or morphology of the resin tags. The hybrid layer was present, unbroken and uniform in both the group where adhesive was used with a phosphoric acid total etch and the self-etch system group. Whatever the bonding system, the resin tags had side branches, and greater length and density in the cervical third than in the middle or apical thirds. Bubbles were found in the cement layer in most of the specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The one-bottle and self-etch bonding systems gave similar results in terms of interface morphology when a translucent fiber-reinforced post was cemented into the endodontically prepared roots.     

An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the effectiveness of three 'one-bottle' and two 'three step' adhesive systems (as controls) in the formation of resin tags, adhesive lateral branches and a resin dentin interdiffusion zone (RDIZ) when used to bond fiber posts under clinical conditions. This study was performed using standardized SEM observations and scoring resin tag formation and density. METHODS: Fifty root canal treated teeth, already scheduled for extraction for endodontic or periodontal reasons, were selected for this study. The patients were informed and their written consent was obtained. The samples were randomly allocated to five groups of ten samples each. Group 1: All Bond 2 with C & B (Bisco); Group 2: Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus with Opal Luting Composite (3M); Group 3: Scotchbond 1 in combination with Rely X ARC resin cement (3M); Group 4: One-step with C & B resin cement (Bisco); Group 5: All Bond Experimental with Post Cement HI-X (Bisco). The adhesive systems and resin cements were used strictly according to the manufacturers' instructions. The priming-adhesive solution of each 'one-bottle' system was light-cured before placing the resin cement and the post. Fifty Aestheti-Plus posts (white quartz fiber posts, RTD, France) were used. A week later, the roots were extracted and processed for SEM observations. RESULTS: All the adhesive systems showed a RDIZ and resin tag and adhesive lateral branch formation. Microscopic examination of the restored interfaces of Groups 1 and 2 showed a higher percent of RDIZ than those found in samples of Groups 3, 4 and 5. RDIZ morphology was easily detectable and uniform in the first two thirds of the root canals, whilst in the apical third the RDIZ was not uniformly present. Resin tag morphology and formation were significantly more detectable in the cervical and middle areas than in the apical zone. No statistically significant differences were found among the five groups coronally, while in the apical and middle thirds two 'one-bottle' systems (Groups 3 and 4) showed significantly less resin tags than the control Groups 1, 2 and the experimental Group 5. No statistically significant differences were found among the three 'one-bottle' systems in the three evaluated areas. The standardization of SEM observations and scoring resin tag formation allowed statistical evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The 'three step' adhesive systems can create a wider micromechanical interlocking between adhesive materials and etched dentin than 'one-step' systems.     

SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts

PURPOSE: To verify with SEM the cement layer thickness and uniformity of resin-relined translucent fiber posts (anatomic posts) and standard translucent fiber posts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On 20 extracted maxillary anterior teeth, the roots were endodontically treated and prepared for the insertion of a fiber post. Translucent fiber posts (DT) were luted with a dual-curing resin cement (Duo-Link) in 10 specimens (group 1) after the canal walls had been treated with the One-Step bonding system. In the other 10 specimens (group 2), experimental anatomic posts (Anatomic Post'n Core) were tested. To these posts, a layer of light-curing resin is added to allow for a pre-cementation relining of the post, aimed at improving its fit into the endodontic space. For luting, the same adhesive-resin cement combination of group 1 was used. All the roots were sectioned and prepared for SEM observations. At the 1-mm, 4.5-mm, and 8-mm level of each root, cement thickness was measured, and the presence of gaps or voids within the luting material or at its interfaces was evaluated. A statistical analysis was performed to test the significance of differences in the cement layer thickness around the two types of post and at different levels of the same type of post. RESULTS: In the presence of anatomic posts, the cement layer was significantly thinner and more uniform at the coronal and middle level of the root. In both groups, voids and bubbles were detected within the luting material, within the abutment material, and between fiber post and cement. Gaps were also visible between post and relining material. CONCLUSIONS: The resin cement thickness was significantly lower in the anatomic post group than in the control group (standardized posts), except at the apical third of the canal, where there was no statistically significant difference. A good adaptation of anatomic posts was evident in all of the specimens.     

Bonding of fibre-reinforced composite post to root canal dentin

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine bonding properties of two types of fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) posts cemented into root canals of molars. Serrated titanium posts served as reference. METHODS: Prefabricated carbon/graphite FRC posts with cross-linked polymer matrix and individually formed glass FRC posts with interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) polymer matrix were compared. The crowns of extracted third molars were removed and post space (diameter: 1.5mm) was drilled, etched and bonded. The posts were treated with dimethacrylate adhesive resin, light-polymerized and cemented with a dual-polymerizing composite resin luting cement. After thermocycling (6000x) the samples were cut into discs of thicknesses: 1, 2 and 4mm (n=12/group). Push-out force was measured by pushing the post from one end. Assessment of failure mode was made under a stereomicroscope (1, adhesive failure between post and cement; 2, cohesive failure of post-system; 3, adhesive failure between cement and dentin). RESULTS: The push-out force increased with increased height of dentin disc in all groups (ANOVA, p<0.001). In the 4mm thick dentin discs the individually formed glass FRC posts showed highest push-out force and the difference to that of the titanium posts was significant (ANOVA, p<0.001). The other differences were not statistically significant. None of the individually formed glass FRC posts showed adhesive failures between the post and the cement. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the other posts, there were no adhesive (post-cement) failures with the individually formed glass FRC posts, suggesting better interfacial adhesion of cement to these posts.     

Microtensile bond strength of photoactivated and autopolymerized adhesive systems to root dentin using translucent and opaque fiber-reinforced composite posts

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The use of fiber-reinforced composite resin posts in endodontically treated teeth has increased. However, selecting an adhesive system that provides reliable and long-lasting bonding to root canal dentin remains difficult. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength of 2 adhesive systems to root dentin and 2 different fiber-reinforced composite resin posts. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty single-rooted teeth were instrumented, and root canals were prepared for translucent (Light Post [LP]) or opaque (Aestheti Post [AP]) quartz fiber-reinforced composite resin posts. Two adhesive systems were used: Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SBMP) (autopolymerized) as a control group, and Single Bond (SB) (photoactivated). Teeth were assigned to 4 groups (n=10): SBMP+LP, SBMP+AP, SB+LP, SB+AP. After post cementation, roots were perpendicularly sectioned into 1-mm-thick slices, which were trimmed to obtain dumbbell-shaped specimens. The specimens were divided into 3 regions: cervical (C), middle (M), and apical (A). To determine the bond strength, the bonding area of each specimen was calculated, and specimens were attached to a device to test microtensile strength at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed using 3-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test (alpha=.05). Fractured specimens were examined under a x 25 stereomicroscope to determine the mode of fracture. RESULTS: There were significant differences only among root dentin regions (P<.001). The cervical third (9.16 +/- 1.18 MPa) presented higher mean bond strength values, especially for SBMP. Middle and apical regions demonstrated lower values (7.08 +/- 0.92 and 7.31 +/- 0.60 MPa, respectively). Adhesive and post main factors did not demonstrate significance. Also, no interaction was significant. No cohesive fractures within resin cement, fiber-reinforced composite resin post, or root dentin were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Both adhesive systems tested demonstrated reliable bonding when used with translucent and opaque fiber-reinforced composite posts.     

Influence of dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fiber posts and three dentin regions within a post space

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Debonding is the most frequent failure encountered with translucent fiber posts and usually occurs along the post space dentin-adhesive interface. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different dentin bonding agents and polymerization modes on the bond strength between translucent fiber posts and root dentin in different regions of the post space. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty maxillary canines with similar root lengths were selected, sectioned at the cemento-enamel junction, and the roots were endodontically treated. Following post space preparation, the roots were divided into 4 groups of 10 specimens each, and the post spaces were treated with 1 of 4 different dentin bonding agents: light-polymerized, single-bottle bonding agent Excite (Group EX); dual-polymerized, single-bottle bonding agent Excite DSC (Group EX-DSC); self-etching primer Clearfil Liner Bond 2V with a light-polymerized bonding agent, Bond A (Group CL-LC); or self-etching primer Clearfil Liner Bond 2V with a dual-polymerized bonding agent, Bond A+B (Group CL-DC). Translucent fiber posts (D.T. Light-Post), 2.2 mm in diameter, were luted (Panavia F) in each specimen after respective dentin bonding procedures. The roots were cut into 3-mm-thick sections, perpendicular to the long-axis in cervical, middle, and apical post space dentin. Push-out tests were performed with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, and bond strength values (MPa) were calculated by dividing the force at which bond failure occurred by the bonded area of the post. The data were analyzed with 1- and 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparison tests (alpha=.05). Dentin adhesive bonding mechanisms in different regions of the post spaces were evaluated with a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The highest mean bond strength values were obtained for Group CL-LC (18.3 +/- 4.1 MPa). The dual-polymerized bonding agent resulted in significantly lower bond strength (P<.001) in combination with self-etching primer (Group CL-DC) (13.2 +/- 2.5 MPa). The light-polymerized and dual-polymerized single-bottle bonding agents provided similar bond strengths (12.7 +/- 5.0 for EX; 13.5 +/- 5.3 for EX-DSC). The regional bond strength values of single-bottle bonding agents were reduced significantly in apical post space dentin (P<.001). Self-etching primers did not demonstrate regional differences in post space dentin bonding and dense resin tags were apparent. CONCLUSION: Data suggests that the self-etching primer system used in this study was unaffected by the morphological variations in the post space dentin compared to the single-bottle bonding agents. Dual polymerization did not improve the bond strength values of the bonding agents tested.     

Push‐out bond strength of an experimental self‐adhesive resin cement

The adhesion of fiber posts luted with simplified adhesive systems has been a matter of great interest over the past years. The aim of this study was to assess the post retentive potential of experimental self‐adhesive resin cement (EXP) when used alone and in combination with a self‐etch adhesive. Fiber posts were placed in endodontically treated teeth and divided into four groups (n = 6) according the luting material, as follows: group 1 (EXP alone); group 2 (EXP used with self‐etch adhesive); group 3 (marketed dual‐cured cement used with self‐etch adhesive); and group 4 (marketed self‐adhesive cement). The push‐out test was used to assess the retentive strength of fiber posts (expressed in MPa), and specimens were analyzed under a stereomicroscope to determine failure mode. The adhesive interface between the cement and root canal dentin for each group was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy. The post retentive potential of group 1 (EXP) (7.48 ± 4.35 MPa) was comparable with that of marketed cements from group 4 (6.79 ± 3.68 MPa) and group 3 (8.77 ± 4.58 MPa). When EXP was used in combination with self‐etch adhesive (group 2), significantly higher push‐out bond‐strength values were measured (15.87 ± 4.68 MPa) compared with the other groups.     

不同材料根管桩剪切粘结强度的比较

目的:比较新型石英纤维强化树脂桩和铸造不锈钢桩与树脂类粘结剂粘结后剪切粘结强度的差异,为临床合理选择桩核系统、优化修复设计提供实验依据。方法:选用正常人离体上颌中切牙20颗随机分成两组,截冠处理并预备桩道。制作40个环氧树脂立方体模块并于中央备洞。将两组牙根固定于模块中,分别粘结石英纤维桩与不锈钢桩的一端于牙根桩道内,另一端均用自凝塑料垂直固定于模块中央。模块与力学试验机拉力杆相连,加载速度1mm/min,方向为平行于桩的长轴与牙根脱离的方向剪切牵拉。记录根管桩脱离时的最大载荷和脱落模式。结果:石英纤维桩组的剪切粘结强度(360.58N±19.12N)高于铸造不锈钢桩组(250.82N±22.34N),完全随机设计资料的t检验显示P<0.05,两者差异有显著性。结论:石英纤维桩与树脂类粘结剂的剪切粘结强度明显优于传统铸造镍铬合金桩与粘结剂;石英纤维桩可成为美容牙科修复的有效选择。     

The effect of etching techniques on cement penetration into dentinal tubules on fiber post cementation

ObjectiveA combination of self-etch and additional etch techniques as pre-cementation procedures for fiber post restoration was reported able to increase the bonding of adhesive material. This research aimed to determine the effects of different etching techniques on resin cement penetration into dentinal tubules.Materials and methodsThirty-two endodontic treated premolars were prepared for 10 mm fiber posts and were divided into two groups (n = 16). Group one was treated with self-etch only, and the second was treated with a combination of self-etch and additional etching. The fiber posts were cemented using fluorescent rhodamine B 0.1%-colored resin cement. The samples were cut to a 2 mm thickness in the middle third of the root and were evaluated with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Statistical analysis measurements were analyzed by an independent t-test and Pearson correlation test.ResultsThere were statistically different in densities hybrid layer and resin tag penetration lengths. Statistically strong linear positive correlations between the hybrid layer density and resin tag penetration length in both groups were also observed. Hybrid layer density (9.68 μm), resin tag penetration depth (32.51 μm) in the self-etch group with additional etching were higher than in the other group. The Pearson correlation test results between hybrid bond density and resin tag penetration depth in the self-etch treatment group showed a value of r = 0.634 and p-value = 0.008 and in the etching group self-treatment with additional etching a value of r = 0.516 and p-value = 0.041 (p ≤ 0.05).ConclusionThere is a statistically significant positive correlation or linear relationship between hybrid bond density and the penetration depth of resin tags in both treatment groups: the thicker the hybrid layer density, the deeper the penetration of the resin tags. This phenomenon may increase mechanical strength regarding stronger binding of resin cement to a tooth’s substrate.     

Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts cemented using different adhesive approaches

The aim of this study was to investigate the adhesion of fiber posts cemented with luting agents that utilize three currently available adhesive approaches: etch‐and‐rinse, self‐etch, and self‐adhesive. Forty‐two intact single‐rooted human premolars were used in the study. Teeth were divided into six groups. In each group, a different resin cement with its adhesive system (if needed) and a fiber post were used. The groups were classified, according to the adhesive approach, into the following three categories. (i) Etch‐and‐rinse groups: Calibra resin cement/XPBond adhesive + self‐curing activator (SCA)/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk), FluoroCore 2 core build‐up material/XPBond + SCA/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk), and MultiCore Flow luting and core build‐up material/Excite DSC adhesive/FRC Postec Plus fiber post (Ivoclar Vivadent). (ii) Self‐etch group: Panavia F 2.0/ED primer (Kuraray)/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk). (iii) Self‐adhesive groups: experimental self‐adhesive cement/RadiX Fiber Post (Dentsply Caulk), and RelyX Unicem/RelyX Fiber Post (3M ESPE). The adhesion between the post and the root canal walls was assessed using the ‘thin‐slice’ push‐out test. In the test arrangement used, the self‐etching approach may offer less favourable adhesion to root canal dentin in comparison with etch‐and‐rinse and self‐adhesive approaches.     

Bond strength between root dentin and three glass-fiber post systems

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Glass-fiber posts were introduced for use after endodontic therapy instead of metal alloy and ceramic posts. There are several new types of glass-fiber post systems available, but little is known about how well these posts bond to the root surface. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the bond strengths of 3 different types of glass-fiber post systems-opaque, translucent, and electrical glass-in 3 different locations of prepared post spaces. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty human intact single-rooted extracted teeth were used. The root canals were prepared using a step-back technique and obturated with gutta-percha using lateral condensation. The roots were divided into 3 experimental groups and further divided into 2 subgroups according to testing time (n=10). Roots were restored with 1 of the following post systems according to the manufacturer's instructions: opaque glass-fiber posts (Snowpost), translucent glass-fiber posts (FiberMaster), and electrical glass-fiber posts (Everstick). A self-etching primer (Clearfil Liner Bond) was applied to the walls of the post spaces, allowed to etch for 30 seconds, and gently air dried. A dual-polymerized bonding agent (Clearfil Liner Bond, Bond A and B) was then applied to the same walls. A dual-polymerizing resin luting agent (Panavia F) was mixed for 20 seconds and then placed in the post spaces using a lentulo spiral instrument. The roots were placed in light-protected cylinders; then the light source was placed directly on the flat cervical tooth surfaces and the cement was polymerized. Specimens were stored in light-proof boxes for 24 hours or 1 week after the polymerization procedure. Each root was cut horizontally, and six 1-mm-thick root segments (2 apical, 2 middle, and 2 cervical) were prepared.Using a push-out test, the bond strength between post and dentin was measured after 24 hours or 1 week using a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis was performed with 3-way ANOVA followed by independent t tests (alpha=.05) to detect differences between groups defined by the specific interacting variables. The different combinations of posts and luting material from the cervical segments were analyzed with SEM. RESULTS: The 3-way ANOVA indicated that push-out test values varied significantly according to the post system used (opaque, electrical, and translucent) (P<.01); the root segments (cervical, middle, and apical) (P<.01), however, did not vary statistically according to the time of testing (24 hours and 1 week). Opaque and electrical glass-fiber posts showed higher bond strength values than translucent posts (P<.01). Push-out bond strength values of cervical segments were significantly higher than the middle and apical segments in translucent and electrical glass-fiber post groups (P<.01). In the opaque glass-fiber post group, there were no significant differences between cervical and middle segments. In SEM analysis, a distinct hybrid zone with long, numerous resin tags located between luting material and dentin was exhibited in all post systems. CONCLUSION: The opaque and electrical glass-fiber posts exhibited similar bond strengths, and translucent posts exhibited the lowest bond strength. The highest bond strength was observed in the cervical third of the post spaces for translucent and electrical glass-fiber post groups.     

Translucent fiber post cementation using a light-curing adhesive/composite system: SEM analysis and pull-out test

Objectives. The performance of both light-curing and dual-cured adhesive/luting systems (as control), when used in combination with translucent fibre posts, was evaluated by means of pull-out test and scanning electron microscopy (SEM ) observation.

Methods. Forty root canal treated teeth were randomly divided into two groups of 20 specimens each. Group 1 light-curing system: Excite and Tetric Flow; Group 2 dual cured system: All Bond 2+RelyX ARC. Translucent, double taper fibre posts were used (2.1/1.4 mm diameter). The teeth were stored in NaCl 0.9% solution at 37 °C. A week later, the pull-out test was carried out on all specimens. Ten tested specimens for each group and their corresponding posts were processed for SEM observation. Statistical analysis was performed applying one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by T-test as post-hoc comparison at a significance level set at p<0.05.

Results. There is no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) between the light-curing system group (275.2±58.9 N) and the dual cured one (301.4±40.1 N). SEM observations confirm a good bond between the dentine and the post whatever the curing method employed.

Conclusions. Dual curing of the All Bond 2+RelyX ARC system seems to be the most appropriate method since it allows to cure even those areas which would not be otherwise reached by light. On the other hand, in apical areas, the incomplete curing of the Excite+Tetric Flow system could improve the post adaptation and allow the achievement of both an improved apical seal and a more even distribution of the stress along the canal walls.     

Confocal and scanning electron microscopic study of teeth restored with fiber posts, metal posts, and composite resins

Forty-two single-rooted lower premolars, extracted for periodontal reasons, were endodontically treated and divided into 7 groups of 6 teeth each. In five of the groups, three different types of carbon fiber posts, quartz fiber posts, and titanium posts were used in combination with All Bond 2 dental adhesive. In two groups, two types of carbon fiber posts were also cemented with Panavia 21 dental adhesive. After 3 wk storage in saline, the teeth were longitudinally sectioned; one half was observed using confocal microscopy and the other by scanning electron microscopy. The specimens were evaluated for the presence of a resin dentin interdiffusion zone for the presence of voids at post-resin-dentin interfaces and for the determination of the fiber posts' structure. Upon examination with the confocal microscope, the interfaces of teeth restored with All Bond 2 showed a higher percentage (p < 0.05) of resin dentin interdiffusion zone than those treated with panavia. The fiber size and the post structure were similar in all the fiber posts observed. Some voids were present inside the fiber post structure.