Iatrogenic operative injuries of abdominal and pelvic veins: a potentially lethal complication

PURPOSE: Epidemiologic studies of vascular injuries are usually limited to those caused by trauma. The purpose of this study was to review the management and clinical outcome in patients with operative injuries to abdominal and pelvic veins. METHODS: Clinical data and outcome in all patients with iatrogenic venous injuries during abdominal and pelvic operations between 1985 and 2002 were reviewed. RESULTS: Forty patients (21 men, 19 women; mean age, 51 years [range, 27-87 years]) sustained 44 venous injuries. Injuries occurred during general (30%), colorectal (23%), orthopedic (20%), gynecologic (15%), and other (12%) operations. Factors leading to injury included oncologic resection (65%), difficult anatomic exposure (63%), previous operation (48%), recurrent tumor (28%), and radiation therapy (20%). All patients had substantial bleeding (mean, 3985 mL; range, 500-20,000 mL). Injuries were located in the inferior vena cava (n = 6), portal vein (n = 7), renal vein (n = 1), and iliac vein (n = 30). Repair was performed with venorrhaphy (64%), end-to-end anastomosis (14%), interposition graft (20%), and vessel ligation (2%). Seven patients (18%) died of injury-related causes, including multisystem organ failure (n = 4), uncontrollable bleeding (n = 2), and pulmonary embolism (n = 1). Thirteen patients (32.5%) had major injury-related complications, including repeat exploration because of bleeding (n = 6), multisystem organ failure (n = 6), and venous thrombosis (n = 4). In two patients (5%) unilateral lower extremity edema developed, with no evidence of thrombosis. There was no late graft or venous thrombosis. Variables associated with increased risk for death were massive bleeding, acidosis, hypotension, and hypothermia (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Operative injuries of abdominal and pelvic veins occur in patients undergoing oncologic resection and those with difficult anatomic exposure, owing to previous operation, recurrent tumor, or radiation therapy. Massive blood loss, acidosis, hypotension, and hypothermia are associated with increased risk for death. Repair of venous injuries offers durable results with low incidence of graft or venous thrombosis.     

Missed inadvertent gastrointestinal injuries during abdominal operations: characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment

Inadvertent gastrointestinal tract injuries (IGITI) during abdominal operations increase postoperative morbidity. Common mechanisms for this type of injury are not well-defined. The risk factors associated with an increase in missed IGITI during elective abdominal surgery and a possible strategy that may contribute to early diagnosis were not previously evaluated. Between 1998 and 2006, all the patients who underwent a subsequent laparotomy within 30 days of an index operation were identified. Patients reoperated for missed IGITI, defined as perforation at sites other than previous anastomosis or bowel repair, were collected. Data pertaining to patients, disease, and primary operations' characteristics, as well as reoperation findings and outcomes were studied. Methods of diagnosis of perforation for each particular patient were assessed. Thirty-two patients (15 females, 17 males) underwent a second operation for gastrointestinal tract leak within 30 days of an index surgery due to missed IGITI. The mean age was 59.5 ± 18.2 years (range 21-87). The average time between the first and second operation was 5.3 ± 3.5 days (range 1-13). Adhesions (27 patients), previous operations (20 patients), and laparoscopic approach (13 patients) were the most commonly documented factors that may result in missed IGITI. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal leak due to missed IGITI was made clinically in 12 patients. Twenty patients underwent contrast study before reoperation. Careful selection of patients and type of surgery in addition to awareness of this rare complication may decrease the frequency of missed IGITI, lead to earlier diagnosis, and possibly improve outcomes.     

Thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic vascular injuries]

This paper reviews the surgical management of vascular injuries. Precise clinical and ultrasound evaluation is mandatory during the first steps of emergency treatment. For further documentation of the extent and site of arterial injuries in hemodynamically stable patients, computed tomography and angiography are crucial in differential diagnosis. Especially during the acute phase, the latter is indicated for evaluating the interventional therapy. The key to successful treatment of vascular injuries is immediate surgical control of hemorrhaging vessels.     

Iatrogenic biliary injuries during cholecystectomy

AIM OF THE STUDY: To analyze our experience with biliary injuries during cholecystectomy in order to determine associated risk factors, morbidity, and results after reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Review of the series of patients referred to our department for biliary injury during cholecystectomy over a 9-year period. Items regarding the type of lesion, risk factors, management, morbidity, and late results were recorded. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were referred to our department for bile duct injury during cholecystectomy between 1997 and 2005 (14 by laparoscopy and four by laparotomy; nine women and nine men). The main surgical indication was biliary colic (n=8). Three patients were operated on in an emergency setting (for acute cholecystitis). In nine patients the gallbladder wall was inflammatory. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in nine patients, but revealed just one injury. Lateral injury to the bile duct was the most frequent type of lesion. In nine patients, the injury was detected intraoperatively and a biliary drainage was left in place; five of them had a synchronic repair and three required later reconstruction. Nine patients had a delayed identification of biliary injury; six of them required a biliodigestive anastomosis. Two patients died, three had several episodes of acute cholangitis after reconstruction and two presented incisional hernia. CONCLUSION: An inflammatory environment is the main risk factor for biliary injury during cholecystectomy. Bile duct injury is more frequent with laparoscopic cholecystectomy but can also occur with an open approach. Intraoperative cholangiography does not prevent biliary injuries nor detect them accurately. Biliary drainage can reduce morbidity for intraoperatively detected injuries and may be a sensitive approach for the surgeon with no hepatobiliary experience. Morbidity is increased in patients with delayed identification of the injury.     

Outcome of iatrogenic injuries to the abdominal and pelvic veins

Purpose  To analyze the management and outcome of iatrogenic injuries to the abdominal and pelvic veins. Methods  We reviewed a series of patients who sustained iatrogenic vein injuries between 1989 and 2004. Results  Thirty patients (21 men and 9 women ranging in age from 38 to 82 years; mean age, 53.6 years) sustained major vein injuries during general (46%), gynecological (20%), orthopedic (13%), colorectal (10%), or urologic (10%) operations. The following veins were injured: inferior vena cava (n = 10), portal vein (n = 4), iliac vein (n = 15), and renal vein (n = 1). The following types of repair were carried out: venorrhaphy (56%), end-to-end anastomosis (10%), and an interposition graft (33%). Seven patients (23%) died of injury-related causes and 18 (60%) suffered major injury-related complications, including bleeding requiring repeat exploration (n = 7), disseminated vascular coagulopathy (DIC; n = 5), venous thrombosis (n = 4), and lower limb arterial ischemia (n = 2). There were two cases of late venous thrombosis. Conclusion  Iatrogenic vein injuries can occur during radical surgery for cancer and are associated with high morbidity and mortality as a result of massive bleeding. Rapid vascular control and venous repair improve early and late outcome.