The training of pediatric residents in the care of acutely ill and injured children

OBJECTIVES: To describe the current educational experience of pediatric residents in pediatric emergency care, to identify areas of variability between residency programs, and to distinguish areas in need of further improvement. DESIGN: A 63-item survey mailed to all accredited pediatric residency training program directors in the United States and Puerto Rico. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric residency programs and their directors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary training settings, required and elective rotations related to the care of the acutely ill and injured child, supervision of care, procedural and technical training, and didactic curriculum in pediatric emergency medicine (PEM). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three (72%) of 213 residency programs responded. One hundred nine (71%) were based at general or university hospitals, the remaining 44 (29%) were based at freestanding children's hospitals. Residents most commonly saw patients in pediatric emergency departments (54%), followed by acute care clinics (21%), general emergency departments (21%), and urgent care clinics (5%). The mean number of weeks of PEM training required was 11, but varied widely from 0 to 36 weeks. Forty programs (27%) required their residents to spend 4 or fewer weeks rotating in an emergency department setting. The best predictor of the number of weeks spent in emergency medicine was residency program size, with small programs requiring fewer weeks (7 weeks for small [1-8 postgraduate year 1 residents] vs 13 for medium [9-17 postgraduate year 1 residents] vs 15 for large [> or =18 postgraduate year 1 residents]). Pediatric surgery (18%), orthopedic (8%), anesthesia (6%), and toxicology (4%) rotations were rarely required. Ninety-two percent of the programs had 24-hour on-site attending physician coverage of the emergency department. Supervising physicians varied widely in their training and included PEM attendings and fellows, general emergency medicine attendings, and general pediatric attendings. Small programs were less likely to have PEM coverage (57% at small vs 95% at large) and more likely to have general emergency medicine coverage (79% at small vs 29% at large). Reported opportunities to perform procedures were uniformly high and did not differ by program size or affiliated fellowship. Residency program directors were uniformly confident in their residents' training in medical resuscitation, critical care, emergency care, airway management, and minor trauma. Thirty-seven percent of all respondents were not confident in their residents' training in major trauma. Most programs reported that they had a didactic PEM curriculum (77%), although the number of hours devoted to the lectures varied substantially. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variability exists in the amount of time devoted to emergency medicine within pediatric residency training curricula and in the training background of attendings used to supervise patient care and resident education. Nevertheless, pediatric residency training programs directors feel confident in their residents training in most topics related to PEM. Residents' training in major trauma resuscitation was the most frequently cited deficiency.     

Emergency physician perspectives on child passenger safety: a national survey of attitudes and practices

ObjectiveTo understand attitudes and self-reported practices of pediatric and general emergency physicians regarding child passenger safety.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional mailed national survey of 600 pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians and 600 emergency medicine (EM) physicians who provide clinical care in the United States randomly sampled from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Survey questions explored attitudes related to the role of the physician and the emergency department (ED) in child passenger safety and self-reported frequency of performing specific child passenger safety practices.ResultsResponses were received from 638 of 1000 (64%) eligible physicians with a valid mailing address. Surveys were completed by 367 PEM and 271 EM physicians. Regardless of their training background, emergency physicians overwhelmingly agreed that it is their role to educate parents about child passenger safety (95% PEM vs 82% EM) and that they can make a difference in how parents restrain their child (92% PEM vs 93% EM). Physicians were similar in their views that the most appropriate person to provide child passenger safety information in their ED was a nurse/midlevel provider followed by a physician. Self-report of child passenger safety practices in response to 2 hypothetical scenarios showed physicians infrequently provide best-practice safety recommendations to families.ConclusionsEmergency physicians are supportive of the ED as a setting to promote child passenger safety, yet do not consistently promote child passenger safety themselves. Differences between PEM and EM physicians’ attitudes toward child passenger safety may necessitate different approaches on injury prevention in general and pediatric EDs.     

Practitioners of pediatric emergency medicine: a 5-year longitudinal study

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the evolution of the responsibilities, goals and expectations of sub-Board-certified practitioners of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) over a 5-year period. METHODS: This was a prospective, cohort study. A questionnaire was mailed in January 1994 to all physicians sub-Board-certified in PEM by either the American Board of Pediatrics or the American Board of Emergency Medicine. It included questions about the type of work the physicians did and expectations for the future. This group of physicians was surveyed again in January 1999. The primary outcome measures were changes in the physicians' goals and expectations for the future. Table. RESULTS: Questionnaires were mailed to 232 PEM sub-Board-certified physicians in January 1994. By June 1994, 183 of the 232 responded to the survey. Follow-up questionnaires were mailed to the cohort of 183 physicians in January 1999. By June 1999, 170 of the 183 (93%) had replied. The table summarizes results. In 1994, the most commonly listed career goals were to increase research productivity (52%) and develop excellent teaching skills (35%). In 1999, the most commonly listed goals were to improve hours/lifestyle (61%) and increase administrative work (33%). CONCLUSION: The priorities of this cohort of PEM sub-Board-certified physicians have changed as the physicians grow older. Lifestyle issues must be taken into consideration to ensure longevity in the subspecialty.     

Carbon dioxide monitoring in emergency medicine training programs

OBJECTIVES: Although the measurement of carbon dioxide (CO2) in breath is the standard of care for verification of endotracheal tube placement in all anesthesia practice and in the prehospital setting, there is currently no uniform consensus on the status of CO2 monitoring in emergency medicine. We conducted this survey to delineate practice patterns of CO2 monitoring in academic emergency medicine training programs and to describe the preference for type of CO2 monitoring device. METHODS: We surveyed the availability, presence, and types of CO2 monitoring in all general emergency medicine (GEM) residency programs and all pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship programs. A two-question survey was used, and data were collected from March 1998 to June 1998. The clinicians surveyed were asked whether their emergency department (ED) used CO2 monitoring for detection of endotracheal tube placement and, if so, what type of CO2 monitoring devices was used. Types of CO2 monitoring devices were categorized as colorimetric, capnometric, capnographic, or combinations of these. RESULTS: Of the 168 programs surveyed, all GEM and PEM programs responded, and the survey results showed that 136 of 168 (81%) used some form of CO2 monitoring, and 32 of 168 (19%) did not use CO2 monitoring. The majority of programs (115/168, 68%) used a single device. Colorimetric devices were used most frequently (76/168, 45%), and capnometry was used the least (9/168, 5%). PEM programs had a significant preference for quantitative CO2 monitoring, whereas GEM programs had a significant preference for qualitative CO2 monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of academic emergency medicine training programs used CO2 monitoring, 19% did not. Colorimetric devices were the most frequently used CO2 monitoring technology.     

Pediatric hospitalists in Canada and the United States: a survey of pediatric academic department chairs.

OBJECTIVES: To document the prevalence and practice patterns of pediatric hospitalists in academic centers in Canada and the United States; to characterize academic pediatric department chairs' definition of the term hospitalist; and to characterize pediatric department chairs' views of the training requirements for pediatric hospitalists. METHODS: A 14-item questionnaire was sent to all 145 pediatric department chairs from Canada and the United States during the fall of 1998. We defined hospitalists as physicians spending at least 25% of their time in inpatient care. RESULTS: Of the 145 eligible pediatric chairs, 128 (89%) responded (United States, 111/126; Canada, 14/16; Puerto Rico, 3/3). Ninety-nine (77%) of 128 pediatric chairs either have (64/128) or are planning to have (35/128) hospitalists in their institutions. Within academic programs with hospitalists, 82% of hospitalists currently work on general pediatric wards. Two thirds of hospitalists teach, 50% provide outpatient care, 50% have administrative duties, and 44% conduct research. One hundred eight (84%) of 128 believe that hospitalists should spend at least 50% of their time in inpatient care. Less than one third (30%) of pediatric chairs believe that hospitalists require training not currently provided in residency. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of academic pediatric centers either employed or planned to employ hospitalists in 1998. Pediatric academic department chairs do not see a need for training beyond residency for hospitalists. Further studies should address how pediatric hospitalists affect quality of care, cost, and patient satisfaction.     

National trends in pediatric resident recruitment.

Primary care residency programs throughout the nation are having increasing difficulty recruiting sufficient residents. Only 65% of pediatric residency positions are filled with medical graduates from the United States. We sent a questionnaire to pediatric residency program directors throughout the country to assess what changes pediatric programs had implemented in response to matching concerns. Forty-one percent had recruited non-house officer professionals to perform resident-type work. Such professionals included osteopathic and/or foreign-trained physicians (55%) and moonlighters (49%). House staff work hours had been reduced in 35% of programs and on-call frequency in 33%. Sixty-one percent had made significant changes in their recruiting practices in the past 5 years that are described herein. Annual recruiting budgets varied from nothing to over $75,000. This survey reveals widespread reduction in resident work load and increased intensity in the recruiting process throughout the country.     

Physician coverage in the pediatric emergency room. A national survey

Pediatric emergency services are provided by most pediatric teaching hospitals in the United States. However, little information has been published regarding staffing patterns. The present study assessed the staffing of 155 such residency programs. While two thirds of the programs provide 24-hour on-site resident coverage in their pediatric emergency rooms, only 10% utilize attending pediatricians on a similar basis. Although coverage increases with increasing training-program size and emergency-room patient volume, the majority (79%) of even the largest residency programs do not provide 24-hour attending pediatrician coverage in the emergency room. Administrators of pediatric residency programs are urged to improve the staffing of their emergency rooms to include attending pediatricians on a 24-hour basis.     

Pediatric emergency medicine fellowships: a survey

A survey of 24 existing pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs as of December 1987 was conducted in order to characterize the following attributes of training in pediatric emergency medicine: amount of clinical time, required and elective rotations, didactic and research experience, patient volume, and staffing. Time spent in the emergency department varies between three and 10 months annually, with a mean of 34.5 hours per week. Twenty-two (92%) of the programs have required rotations. All responding programs require research and some degree of didactic education. Patient volume varies between 20,000 and 70,000, with a median of 41,000. The data offered should act as a reference for the further development of new and existing programs.     

Current income profile for academic pediatric emergency medicine faculty.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To survey academic pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) programs for information on financial compensation and patient care activities of PEM faculty and compare the results to the financial data published by the AAEM, AAAP, and MGMA. METHODS: A survey was mailed to program directors requesting information on medical school affiliation, ED census, recruitment, patient care activity and annual income for each academic rank. The survey also included questions on CME benefits, and income adjustment mechanisms/bonus plans for PEM faculty. The survey income data were stratified by program size and geographic region and then compared to income data from the AAMC, AAAP, and MGMA. RESULTS: Of 47 eligible programs, 37 (78.7%) responded,and four were excluded. Mean number of clinical hours per week for academic faculty and clinical faculty were 27.9 +/- 3.5 and 32.4 +/- 3.9, respectively, (P = 0.000). Clinical appointments in academic departments were offered by 82% of the programs. Mean annual income for all academic ranks was $121,503 +/- $15,795, and is nearly $37,000 less than the annual income for academic adult emergency medicine (AEM) faculty. Compared to medium and large programs, small programs are offering higher salaries to recent fellowship graduates (P = 0.004). When income data were stratified by program size or geographic region, no significant difference in average annual income was observed. Bonus or incentive plans were available only in 45.5% of the programs. CONCLUSION: Direct patient care responsibility of PEM academic faculty has not changed significantly in the past 13 years, despite the availability of clinical appointments within most of the surveyed programs. Our data indicate that the annual income for PEM faculty in academic institutions is significantly less than AEM faculty. No significant difference was observed between programs at the assistant, associate, or full professor level when stratified by size or geographic region. Bonus/incentive plans for exceptional patient care or scholarly activity were available in less than half of the surveyed programs.     

The pediatric program director. An analysis of the role and its problems

A questionnaire designed to elicit information about the work environment, knowledge, and stresses of pediatric residency program directors was mailed to the 235 member programs of the Association of Pediatric Program Directors (APPD). At the time that the 187 respondents (80% return rate) assumed responsibility for their training programs, many rated their knowledge of various aspects of residency program administration as "poor." The respondents indicated that a lack of time, the pressures of too many other academic responsibilities, and a fear of not "filling" all positions in the National Intern Matching Program created much personal stress. Most program directors felt that educational conferences designed to teach educational methods, and administrative skills, and provide technical information knowledge necessary for residency program supervision would be beneficial.     

Pediatric Resident Training in the Community Hospital Setting: A Survey of Program Directors

Background and ObjectiveThe role of a hospitalist differs in a community hospital (CH) compared to a university/children's hospital. Residents are required to practice in a variety of relevant clinical settings, but little is known about current trends regarding pediatric resident training in different hospital settings. This study explores CH rotations including their value for resident training, characteristics, benefits, and drawbacks. This study also seeks to define “community hospital.”MethodsAuthors conducted an online cross-sectional survey of pediatric residency program directors distributed by the Association of Pediatric Program Directors. The survey was developed and revised based on review of the literature and iterative input from experts in pediatric resident training and CH medicine. It assessed residency program demographics, availability of CH rotations, value of CH rotations, and their characteristics including benefits and drawbacks.ResultsResponse rate was 56%. CH rotations were required at 24% of residency programs, available as an elective at 46% of programs, and unavailable at 48% of programs. Residency program directors viewed these rotations as valuable for resident training. CH rotations were found to have multiple benefits and drawbacks. Definitions of “community hospital” varied and can be categorized according to positive or negative characteristics.ConclusionsResident rotations at a CH provide valuable learning opportunities with multiple potential benefits that should be weighed against drawbacks in the context of a residency program's curriculum. There are many characteristics that potentially distinguish CH from university/children's hospitals.     

Internal medicine-pediatrics combined residency graduates: what are they doing now? Results of a survey.

BACKGROUND: While the number of internal medicine-pediatrics (med/peds) residency training programs has increased considerably in the past decade, questions continue to be raised about career paths of the graduates of these programs. It is uncertain whether med/peds graduates follow a generalist career path and whether they continue to practice both specialties. OBJECTIVE: To determine the career outcomes of graduates of med/peds residency programs. DESIGN: A survey questionnaire of graduates of med/peds residency programs. METHODS: The computer databases of the American Board of Pediatrics and the American Board of Internal Medicine were used to identify 1482 individuals who had completed training in combined med/peds residency programs between 1986 and 1995 and who had applied to either board for certification. The survey questionnaire was mailed to all graduates identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time spent in professional activity (patient care, teaching, administration, and research), site of principal clinical activity, ages of the patient population, types of hospital privileges, practice organization, subspecialty activity, night and weekend coverage arrangements, community size of practice, involvement in teaching, and membership in professional organizations. RESULTS: Of the total group of 1482 graduates, 87.3% are certified by the American Board of Internal Medicine, 91.3% by the American Board of Pediatrics, and 81.6% by both boards. The survey was completed by 1005 graduates (67.8%). The principal activity of almost 70% of the graduates was direct patient care. Most graduates cared for patients of all ages. More than half of all respondents noted that their principal clinical site is a community office practice. Eighty-five percent managed patients who require hospitalization. Approximately 50% of respondents had a medical school appointment. CONCLUSIONS: This study, the largest survey to date of med/peds graduates, provides strong evidence that most med/peds graduates are practicing generalists who care for adults and children. In addition, the fact that 80% of graduates achieve dual board certification suggests that these physicians are well qualified to care for the spectrum of health care needs of children and adults. Because the changing US health care system mandates a strong primary care base, these physicians will play a small but important role in providing high-quality generalist care.     

Reported Knowledge and Management of Potential Penicillin Allergy in Children

BackgroundPediatric emergency medicine (PEM) and primary care provider (PCP) providers are the most likely physicians to initially label a child as allergic to penicillin. Differences in knowledge and management of reported penicillin allergy between these 2 groups have not been well characterized.MethodsA cross-sectional, 20-question survey was administered to PEM and PCPs to ascertain differential knowledge and management of penicillin allergy. Knowledge regarding high- and low-risk symptoms for true allergy and extent of history taking regarding allergy were compared between the 2 groups using t tests, Chi-square, and Wilcoxon tests.ResultsIn total, 182 PEM and 54 PCPs completed the survey. PEM and PCPs reported that 74.1 ± 19.5% and 69.0 ± 23.8% of patients with remote low-risk symptoms of allergy could tolerate penicillin without an allergic reaction. PEM and PCPs incorrectly identified low-risk symptoms of allergy as high-risk, including vomiting with medication administration and delayed skin rash. PCPs took more detailed allergy histories when compared with PEM providers. In total, 143 (78.5%) of PEM providers and 51 (94.4%) PCPs were interested in using a penicillin allergy questionnaire to segregate children into high- or low-risk categories.ConclusionsMost pediatric providers believe that children with a remote history of low-risk allergy symptoms could tolerate penicillin without an allergic reaction; however, this is infrequently acted upon. Both PEM and PCP providers were likely to classify low-risk symptoms as high-risk and infrequently referred children for further detailed allergy assessment. Both groups were receptive to decision support measures to facilitate improved penicillin allergy classification and labeling and support antibiotic appropriateness in their patients.     

Oral versus intravenous: rehydration preferences of pediatric emergency medicine fellowship directors

OBJECTIVE: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends oral rehydration therapy (ORT) for management of uncomplicated childhood gastroenteritis with mild-moderate dehydration. However, ORT is widely underused relative to their recommendations. We compared ORT use by directors of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) fellowship training programs with AAP recommendations, and sought to identify their barriers to ORT. METHODS: Mail/fax survey of the directors of U.S. and Canadian PEM fellowship programs. The survey included 10 scenarios of mild or moderately dehydrated children with gastroenteritis, a personal innovativeness scale, self-assessment of ORT experience and knowledge, and open-ended questions regarding perceived barriers to ORT use. RESULTS: 60/67 (89.6%) PEM fellowship program directors responded. All reported experience with and knowledge about ORT. Only 10/58 (17.2%) believe ORT is usually better than intravenous (i.v.) rehydration in all 10 clinical scenarios, and only 4/58 (6.7%) usually use ORT in all 10 scenarios. 18/58 (31%) usually use ORT for all mildly but no moderately dehydrated children. ORT use did not correlate with personal innovativeness scores. Important barriers cited by respondents include additional time requirements for ORT relative to i.v. rehydration (76.7%) and expectation of i.v. rehydration by parents (41.7%) or primary care physicians (10%). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to AAP recommendations, PEM fellowship directors underuse ORT, especially for moderately dehydrated children. Physician innovativeness does not influence ORT use. Further study of effectiveness, length of stay, staff requirements, and ORT acceptance in the emergency department setting, especially in children with moderate dehydration, may influence ORT use.     

Death and the pediatric house officer revisited

Thirty-six third-year pediatric residents at four Western university training programs were interviewed individually and retrospectively about the magnitude of their clinical experience in managing the treatment of chronically ill and dying children, as well as the psychosocial educational curriculum of their training program as it pertained to these experiences. The residents managed an average of 35 dying children during their first 2 1/2 years of pediatric residency. They imparted the news of a potentially fatal disease to an average of 33 families during this same time span. There was a disparity between the magnitude of the clinical experience and the time and emphasis on these issues in the residency curriculum. The implications of these findings for an improved educational curriculum in the psychosocial care of dying children are discussed.     

A nationwide survey of behavioral pediatric residency training

This survey assessed the prevalence of behavioral pediatric residency training in the U.S., the professional background of faculty, training methods utilized, curriculum content, and barriers to expansion of behavioral training. Questionnaires were returned by 60% of 246 accredited pediatric residency programs; of these, 49% had a "formal" behavioral training program, 38% offered some training, and 13% offered none. Formal programs identified 419 faculty members involved in teaching behavioral pediatrics to residents: physicians (48%), psychologists (21%), social workers (19%), nurses (8%), other (4%). Mandatory training was more frequent than elective training; continuous training was more likely than block rotations to be mandatory. "Inadequate funding" and "lack of appropriately trained faculty" were most frequently cited as barriers to expansion of the teaching of behavioral pediatrics.     

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Attending Perspectives on Maintaining Professionalism

Attending physicians are the primary role models of professionalism, but little is known what their perspective is on the maintenance of their professionalism. This study characterizes the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) attending perspective on maintaining professionalism during their career. Two qualitative methods were used: field observation and semi-structured interviews. Field observations were conducted in one pediatric emergency department (ED) based on a framework for professionalism education. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of PEM attendings from across the country. Interviews were transcribed and themes analyzed using an iterative, inductive process. The two differing methods allowed for data triangulation. Forty-five hours of ED observation were completed with thematic coding of observations. Seventeen interviews were conducted with PEM physicians around the country with a wide variety of demographic characteristics. Observations and interviews revealed several themes describing the PEM attending’s perspective on professionalism. Challenges to professionalism include: patient related factors (such as high volume and acuity, difficult medical situations and dissatisfied families), staff interactions (RN, ancillary, etc), trainee education and interaction, ED environment, academic pressures, and personal factors. By understanding the PEM attending perspective on professionalism, resources and education can be better targeted for professional development and interventions to solve the challenges that PEM physicians identify. Understanding the PEM attending perspective may also be useful in developing assessment tools for attendings and may provide deeper insight into the impact of role models on trainee professionalism education.