Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitals and the community: stealth dynamics and control catastrophes

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) represents a serious threat to the health of hospitalized patients. Attempts to reduce the spread of MRSA have largely depended on hospital hygiene and patient isolation. These measures have met with mixed success: although some countries have almost eliminated MRSA or remained largely free of the organism, others have seen substantial increases despite rigorous control policies. We use a mathematical model to show how these increases can be explained by considering both hospital and community reservoirs of MRSA colonization. We show how the timing of the intervention, the level of resource provision, and chance combine to determine whether control measures succeed or fail. We find that even control measures able to repeatedly prevent sustained outbreaks in the short-term can result in long-term control failure resulting from gradual increases in the community reservoir. If resources do not scale with MRSA prevalence, isolation policies can fail "catastrophically."     

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Europe: which infection control measures are taken?

Background

The prevalence of hospital-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections shows a huge variety across Europe. Some countries reported a reduction in MRSA frequency, while in others countries increasing MRSA rates have been observed. To reduce the spread of MRSA in the healthcare setting, a sufficient MRSA management is essential. In order to reflect the MRSA management across Europe, MRSA prevention policies were surveyed in ten countries.

Materials and methods

The survey was performed by questionnaires in European intensive care units (ICUs) and surgical departments (SDs) in 2004. Questionnaires asked for availability of bedside alcohol hand-disinfection, isolation precautions, decolonization and screening methods. The study was embedded in the Hospital in Europe Link for Infection Control through Surveillance (HELICS) Project, a European collaboration of national surveillance networks. HELICS was initiated in order to harmonize the national surveillance activities in the individual countries. Therefore, HELICS participants developed surveillance modules for nosocomial infections in ICUs and for surgical site infections (SSI). The coordination of this surveillance has now been transferred to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).

Results

A total of 526 ICUs and 223 SDs from ten countries sent data on organisational characteristics and policies, demonstrating wide variations in care. Substantial variation existed in availability of bedside alcohol hand-disinfection, which was much higher in participating ICUs rather than in SDs (86 vs. 59%). Surveillance cultures of contact patients were obtained in approximately three-fourths of all SDs (72%) and ICUs (75%). Countries with decreasing MRSA proportions showed especially strict implementation of various prevention measures.

Conclusion

The data obtained regarding MRSA prevention measures should stimulate infection control professionals to pursue further initiatives. Particularly, the vigorous MRSA management in countries with decreasing MRSA proportions should encourage hospitals to implement preventive measures in order to reduce the spread of MRSA.     

Environmental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a veterinary teaching hospital during a nonoutbreak period

Concurrent to reports of zoonotic and nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in veterinary settings, recent evidence indicates that the environment in veterinary hospitals may be a potential source of MRSA. The present report is a cross-sectional study to determine the prevalence of MRSA on specific human and animal contact surfaces at a large veterinary hospital during a nonoutbreak period. A total of 156 samples were collected using Swiffers(?) or premoistened swabs from the small animal, equine, and food animal sections. MRSA was isolated and identified by pre-enrichment culture and standard microbiology procedures, including growth on Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with NaCl and oxacillin, and by detection of the mecA gene. Staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profile were also determined. MRSA was detected in 12% (19/157) of the hospital environments sampled. The prevalence of MRSA in the small animal, equine, and food animal areas were 16%, 4%, and 0%, respectively. Sixteen of the MRSA isolates from the small animal section were classified as USA100, SCCmec type II, two of which had pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pattern that does not conform to any known type. The one isolate obtained from the equine section was classified as USA500, SCCmec type IV. The molecular epidemiological analysis revealed a very diverse population of MRSA isolates circulating in the hospital; however, in some instances, multiple locations/surfaces, not directly associated, had the same MRSA clone. No significant difference was observed between animal and human contact surfaces in regard to prevalence and type of isolates. Surfaces touched by multiple people (doors) and patients (carts) were frequently contaminated with MRSA. The results from this study indicate that MRSA is present in the environment even during nonoutbreak periods. This study also identified specific surfaces in a veterinary environment that need to be targeted when designing and executing infection control programs.     

Colonization of HIV-infected outpatients in Taiwan with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

To better understand the epidemiology of bacterial pathogens with particular public health importance in Taiwan, we determined the prevalence of nasal colonization with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in a cohort of HIV-infected patients attending two hospital outpatient departments. All HIV-infected patients followed regularly between May and September 1999 were enrolled and cultures of the anterior nares were performed using a dry sponge swab. All confirmed S. aureus isolates underwent antimicrobial susceptibility testing using disk diffusion according to recommendations of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Of a total of 162 outpatients studied, 48 (30%) were found colonized with S. aureus including 39 (24%) colonized with MSSA and 9 (6%) colonized with MRSA. The only factor associated with MSSA colonization was receipt of trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole which appeared protective (relative risk 0.4, 95% confidence interval [CI(95)] 0.2-0.78, P = 0.006). In contrast, ciprofloxacin use was an independent risk factor for MRSA colonization (conditional odds ratio [OR] 11.9, CI(95) 1.8-77.8, P = 0.010) along with a one-quartile reduction in CD(4) count (OR 3.9, CI(95) 1.1-14.3, P = 0.04). Although MRSA colonization was not associated with hospitalization within the previous three months, the multi-drug resistance pattern of MRSA isolates suggests strains were at some point acquired in the healthcare setting. Our study shows that the rate of S. aureus colonization in Taiwanese HIV-infected outpatients is 30%. Low CD4+ counts are most likely associated with other unmeasured risk factors for MRSA. Antimicrobial use may function alternatively as a protective or risk factor for colonization with S. aureus, depending upon the drugs involved and resistance encountered. Fluoroquinolone use may have an important role in the spread of MRSA from inpatient to outpatient settings.     

Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Spanish hospital

Recent reports of the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Europe are infrequent compared with reports in the 1960s. Annual incidence of the isolation of MRSA was studied in a general hospital in Guipúzcoa (Basque country) over a 9-year period. Overall prevalence was 4.5%-12.93% in the first 3 years (coinciding with an epidemic phase) and later 0.29%, underlining the cyclic and epidemic nature of this infection.     

Eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a health center ward and associated nursing home

BACKGROUND: Long-term health care facilities have been recognized as reservoirs of multiresistant bacterial strains, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Efforts to control MRSA in this setting usually have been only partially effective. We describe herein the eradication of epidemic MRSA from a Finnish health care center ward and affiliated nursing home. METHODS: The methods to control MRSA included (1) contact isolation precautions, (2) screening for asymptomatic carriage, (3) eradication of carriage, and (4) education of staff on hygienic measures. The first 6 patients with MRSA-positive findings were referred without delay to the Infectious Diseases Unit of the adjacent university hospital for eradication treatment. Later, an isolation unit of 6 rooms was founded in the health care center, where the MRSA-colonized patients were nursed as a separate cohort until they, in succession, were referred to the Infectious Diseases Unit for decolonization. RESULTS: From May 20 through August 17, 1993, the epidemic MRSA strain was isolated from 8 long-term patients on the 40-bed ward of the health care center, 4 of the 59 residents of the nursing home, and 1 member of the staff. Eradication of carriage was successful in all except 1 patient with dementia, who was nursed in contact isolation in the health care center until his death 21 months later. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to eradicate MRSA from a long-term health care facility even after 13 cases by applying strict control measures. Our experience may be valuable in the future decision-making process for control of new and more challenging multiresistant bacteria, eg, vancomycin-resistant strains of MRSA.     

Transmission via the face is one route of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cross-infection within a hospital

BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that hospital personnel must not touch their faces, and indeed must not elevate their hands above the shoulder in the ward, because many bacteria including Staphylococcus aureus colonize the face. However, possible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) cross-infection by way of faces has not yet been properly examined. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-eight isolates from 159 inpatients from February 1999 to January 2000 were subjected to chromosomal DNA analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). RESULTS: The 178 MRSA isolates were classified into 43 PFGE types. Cross-infection was more frequent in the Department of Neurology [average number of patients per PFGE pattern (n/PFGE) = 4.0] than in the other six nonsurgical departments (n/PFGE = 1.0-1.6), and more frequent in four surgical departments (n/PFGE = 2.0-4.5) than in the other eight (n/PFGE = 1.0-1.7). In neurology, patients' faces were more often touched for examination of the cranial nerves than in the other departments. In the above four surgical departments, organs in the face were chiefly operated upon, and the patients' faces were also touched for care before and after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals the possibility of MRSA being transmitted by way of patients' faces in a hospital.     

Prevalence of community acquired MRSA in a tertiary care facility

Traditionally, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is considered as a nosocomial pathogen, but an increasing prevalence of community acquired MRSA is being reported worldwide including India, which implies a strategic change in the antibiotic of choice for treatment of community acquired Staphylococcal infections, which till now is cloxacillin. This study is aimed at identifying the prevalence and susceptibility characteristics of community acquired MRSA in our hospital. The study group consisted of 208 consecutive MRSA identified on the basis of their resistance to cefoxitin disk (30 microg) by the disc diffusion method and mecA gene detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Isolates were categorized as community acquired MRSA based on criteria for inclusion and their antibiotic susceptibility was compared with that of the hospital acquired MRSA isolates. Among the 208 MRSA analyzed, 18% (n = 37) were community acquired and were from infections such as cellulitis and superficial injuries. The isolates were significantly more sensitive to ciprofloxacin than the hospital acquired MRSA isolates. The prevalence of community acquired MRSA in this study (18%) is comparable to its prevalence in other studies across India. Susceptibility to antibiotics other than glycopeptides was an important characteristic of community acquired MRSA. In the absence of other reliable phenotypic test for its identification, susceptibility to ciprofloxacin is suggested as an alternative. A prudent clinician should be aware that, cloxacillin, the drug of choice for skin infections such as carbuncle and cellulitis, will not be effective in these cases and that community acquired MRSA has a range of antibiotics to choose from, other than the glycopeptides, when compared with that of hospital acquired MRSA.     

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: factors responsible for its incidence

INTRODUCTION: How can we explain that the proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) varies between the European countries, ranging from < 1% in Scandinavia to > 30% in Spain, France and Italy? This paper is aimed at attempting to determine factors at the origin of the spreading of endemic MRSA strains as of the early 1980s. Those strains are characterized by their ability to develop resistance to current antibiotics and make treatment of severe and deep infections more complex. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: Differences in the virulence of MRSA strains and that of susceptible strains appear unlikely. MRSA prevalence seems to be a growing problem, especially in Southern Europe where rates of resistance to other anti-staphylococcal antibiotics are high. General policies for antibiotic therapy as well as the implementation of strategies for prevention and control of MRSA might be responsible for such rates. Indeed, once MRSA is introduced into a facility without control program, this multiresistant bacteria rapidly spreads within the hospital and becomes endemic, expanding its reservoir. FUTURE PROSPECTS ET PROJECTS: Due to the introduction of new methods in microbiology and communication, infection control measures including procedures for isolation and identification of MRSA reservoirs are still feasible; however, their implementation requires human and material resources. Areas requiring improvement in the detection of MRSA outbreaks are identified in this paper, with particular emphasis on the need for national surveillance of MRSA prevalence and reappraisal of MRSA control strategies in French hospitals.     

Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at admission to the intensive care unit: results of a multicenter study

BACKGROUND: Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) is an important component of strategies for controlling the spread of MRSA. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted in 14 French ICUs for 6 months. All patients were screened within 24 hours after admission, using nasal and cutaneous swabs In addition, clinical samples were obtained. Patient data collected on ICU admission included presence of immunosuppression; history of hospital stay, surgery, antimicrobial treatments, or previous colonization with MRSA; chronic health evaluation and McCabe scores; reason for admission; whether the patient was transferred from another ward; severity of illness; presence of skin lesions; and invasive procedures. Risk factors for MRSA carriage at ICU admission were estimated, and significantly associated variables were used to develop a predictive score for MRSA carriage. A cost-benefit analysis was then performed. RESULTS: Of the 2347 admissions with MRSA screening, 162 (6.9%; range, 3.7%-20.0% among ICUs) were positive for MRSA, of whom 54.3% were detected through screening specimens only. Of the 2310 first admissions (vs repeat admissions) to the ICU, 96 were newly identified MRSA carriers. Factors associated with MRSA carriage in the multivariate analysis were age older than 60 years, prolonged hospital stay in transferred patients, history of hospitalization or surgery, and presence of open skin lesions in directly admitted patients. Only universal screening detected MRSA carriage with acceptable sensitivity. A cost-benefit analysis confirmed that universal screening and preventive isolation were beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MRSA carriage on admission to the ICU is high in this endemic setting. Screening for MRSA on admission is useful to identify the imported cases and should be performed in all ICU-admitted patients.     

Evaluating the probability of previously unknown carriage of MRSA at hospital admission

Purpose

We determined the prevalence and risk profile of patients with previously unknown carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at hospital admission.

Subjects and methods

We conducted a 7-month, prospective case-controlled study in adult inpatients admitted to a university hospital with endemic MRSA. Multivariate conditional logistic regression for data sets matched 1:4 was performed to identify the risk profile of newly identified MRSA carriers.

Results

Overall, 399 of 12 072 screened admissions (prevalence, 3.3%) were found colonized (n = 368, 92%) or infected (n = 31, 8%) with MRSA. In 204 cases (prevalence, 1.7%), MRSA carriage was newly identified. Without screening on admission, 49% (196/399) of MRSA carriers would have been missed. We identified nine independent risk factors for newly identified MRSA carriage at admission (adjusted odds ratio): male sex (1.9); age greater than 75 years (2.0); receipt of fluoroquinolones (2.7), cephalosporins (2.1), and carbapenems (3.2) in the last 6 months; previous hospitalization (1.9) or intravenous therapy (1.7) during the last 12 months; urinary catheter at admission (2.0); and intrahospital transfer (2.4). A risk score (range, 0-13) was calculated by adding points assigned to these variables. On the basis of analysis of 1006 patients included in the case-controlled study, the probability of MRSA carriage was 8% (28/342) in patients with a low score (≤1), 19% (92/482) in patients with an intermediate score (2-4), and 46% (84/182) in patients with a high score (≥5). The risk score had good discrimination (c-statistic, 0.73) and showed excellent calibration (P = .88).

Conclusions

On-admission prevalence of previously unknown MRSA carriers was high. Applying the risk score to newly admitted patients with an intermediate or high probability of MRSA carriage could allow a more effective MRSA control strategy.     

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii: An unexpected difference in epidemiologic behavior

Background: The Dutch guideline on hospital policy for the prevention of nosocomial spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) states that patients transferred from hospitals abroad must be placed in strict isolation immediately on admission to a hospital in the Netherlands. Three patients colonized with both MRSA and a multiresistant Acinetobacter were transferred from hospitals in Mediterranean countries to 3 different hospitals in the Netherlands. Despite isolation precautions, Acinetobacter spread in 2 of the 3 hospitals, whereas nosocomial spread of MRSA did not occur. Methods: For outbreak analysis, the Acinetobacter isolates, identified as Acinetobacter baumannii by the use of amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis, were comparatively typed by 4 methods. Comparison of isolation measures in the hospitals was performed retrospectively. Results: In the 2 hospitals in which nosocomial spread of Acinetobacter occurred, most of the epidemiologically related isolates were indistinguishable from the index strains. In these 2 hospitals, isolation measures were in concordance with those recommended for the prevention of contact transmission. The precautions of the hospital in which no outbreak occurred included the prevention of airborne transmission. Conclusions: Precautions recommended for multiresistant gram-negative organisms are insufficient for the prevention of nosocomial spread of multiresistant Acinetobacter . The airborne mode of spread of acinetobacters should be taken into account, and guidelines should be revised accordingly. (AJIC Am J Infect Control 1998;26:544-51)     

Prospective, controlled study of vinyl glove use to interrupt Clostridium difficile nosocomial transmission

PURPOSE: Despite recognition that Clostridium difficile diarrhea/colitis is a nosocomial infection, the manner in which this organism is transmitted is still not clear. Hands of health care workers have been shown to be contaminated with C. difficile and suggested as a vehicle of transmission. Therefore, we conducted a controlled trial of the use of disposable vinyl gloves by hospital personnel for all body substance contact (prior to the institution of universal body substance precautions) to study its effect on the incidence of C. difficile disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The incidence of nosocomial C. difficile diarrhea was monitored by active surveillance for six months before and after an intensive education program regarding glove use on two hospital wards. The interventions included initial and periodic in-services, posters, and placement of boxes of gloves at every patient's bedside. Two comparable wards where no special intervention was instituted served as controls. RESULTS: A decrease in the incidence of C. difficile diarrhea from 7.7 cases/1,000 patient discharges during the six months before intervention to 1.5/1,000 during the six months of intervention on the glove wards was observed (p = 0.015). No significant change in incidence was observed on the two control wards during the same period (5.7/1,000 versus 4.2/1,000). Point prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile carriage was also reduced significantly on the glove wards but not on the control wards after the intervention period (glove wards, 10 of 37 to four of 43, p = 0.029; control wards, five of 30 to five of 49, p = 0.19). The cost of 61,500 gloves (4,505 gloves/100 patients) used was $2,768 on the glove wards, compared with $1,895 (42,100 gloves; 3,532 gloves/100 patients) on the control wards. CONCLUSIONS: Vinyl glove use was associated with a reduced incidence of C. difficile diarrhea and is indirect evidence for hand carriage as a means of nosocomial C. difficile spread.     

Carriage of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus by non-hospitalized subjects in Israel

Summary The prevalence of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the anterior nares and axilla was studied in 920 non-hospitalized subjects: 350 drug addicts, 350 individuals presenting at a hospital emergency room for various reasons, and 220 hospital health care workers.S. aureus was isolated from 105 (11.4%) subjects, in six (6.3%) of whom the isolates were methicillin-resistant. The isolation rate of the organism and the prevalence of resistant strains in the different subgroups were, respectively: drug-addicts, n=32 (9.1%), n=2 (6.9%); emergency room patients, n=36 (10.2%), n=1 (3.2%); and hospital health care workers, n=37 (16.8%), n=3 (8.5%). Our findings suggest that MRSA remains uncommon in the community, while the prevalence ofS. aureus carriage (including methicillin-resistant strains) in hospital personnel is quite similar in divergent geographical areas.

---

Nicht hospitalisierte Träger methicillin-resistenter Staphylococcus aureus-Stämme

Zusammenfassung Bei 920 nicht hospitalisierten Personen wurde die Prävalenz methicillinresistenterStaphylococcus aureus-Stämme (MRSA) in der vorderen Nasenmuschel und in der Axilla bestimmt. Untersucht wurden 350 Drogenabhängige, 350 Patienten der Notfallambulanz mit verschiedenen Krankheiten und 220 im Krankehaus Beschäftigte. Bei 105 (11,4%) der Untersuchten wurdeS. aureus nachgewiesen, in sechs Fällen (6,3%) waren die Isolate methicillinresistent. Bezogen auf die verschiedenen Untergruppen fanden sich folgende Isolations- und Resistenzraten: Drogenabhängige n=32 (9,1%), n=2 (6,9%); Patienten der Notfallambulanz n=36 (10,2%), n=1 (3,2%), und Krankenhauspersonal n=37 (16,8%), n=3 (8.5%). Nach unseren Befunden sind MRSA in der Allgemeinbevölkerung noch selten: Die Prävalenz vonS. aureus-Trägertum (einschließlich methicillinresistenter Stämme) ist in verschiedenen geographischen Regionen bei Krankenhauspersonal ziemlich ähnlich.

     

Controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: quantifying the effects of interventions and rapid diagnostic testing

Control of nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been unsuccessful in most countries. Yet, some countries have maintained low endemic levels by implementing nationwide MRSA-specific infection control measures, such as "search & destroy" (S&D). These strategies, however, are not based on well designed studies, and their use in countries with high levels of endemicity is controversial. We present a stochastic three-hospital model and an analytical one-hospital model to quantify the effectiveness of different infection control measures and to predict the effects of rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) on isolation needs. Isolation of MRSA carriers identified by clinical cultures is insufficient to control MRSA. However, combined with proactive search (of high-risk patients on admission and/or contacts of index patients), it will maintain prevalence levels <1%. Concerted implementation of S&D in countries with high nosocomial endemicity reduces nosocomial prevalence to <1% within 6 years. Stepwise implementation of control measures can reduce isolation capacities needed. RDT can reduce isolation needs by >90% in low-endemic settings and by 20% in high-endemic settings. Surveillance of colonization and improved hand hygiene can markedly increase control efficacy. These findings strongly suggest that: (i) causality exists between S&D and low MRSA prevalence; (ii) isolating MRSA carriers identified by clinical cultures as a single measure is insufficient for control; (iii) a combined approach of isolation and screening confers efficacy; and (iv) MRSA-prevalence levels can be reduced to <1% in high-endemic settings by S&D or a stepwise approach to interventions. RDT can markedly enhance feasibility.     

Comprehensive strategy to prevent nosocomial spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a highly endemic setting

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and feasibility of a comprehensive strategy to reduce nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a highly endemic setting have not yet been proved. Limited benefits and the high cost of such programs are the main concerns. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the effect of an aggressive infection control program on transmission of MRSA in the University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases. All patients with MRSA carriage during 5 years (January 1, 1998, through December 31, 2002) were included and categorized into imported or hospital-acquired cases. RESULTS: Methicillin-resistant S aureus was recovered from 223 hospitalized patients; 142 cases were imported and 81 were acquired at our institution. After introduction of the comprehensive infection control program in 1999, the annual incidence of MRSA carriage per 1000 admissions increased from 4.5 in 1998 to 8.0 in 1999 (P = .02), and remained stable thereafter. In this period, the proportion of MRSA cases acquired in our institution decreased from 50.0% in 1999 to 6.1% in 2002 (P<.001), whereas the proportion of MRSA cases transferred from other hospitals (P<.001) and nursing homes (P = .03) increased. All 19 MRSA carriers with 3 sets of follow-up cultures were successfully decolonized. CONCLUSIONS: With a comprehensive infection control program, it was possible to reduce nosocomial transmission of MRSA in a highly endemic setting. With good hand hygiene using alcohol handrub, early detection, isolation, and a decolonization strategy, containment of MRSA was achievable, despite a high rate of transferred patients with MRSA.     

Usefulness of cooling and coronary catheterization to improve survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) continue to be poor. Recent evidence suggests that a more aggressive approach to postresuscitation care, in particular combining therapeutic hypothermia with early coronary intervention, can improve prognosis. We performed a single-center review of 125 patients who were resuscitated from OHCA in 2 distinct treatment periods, from 2002 to 2003 (control group) and from 2007 to 2009 (contemporary group). Patients in the contemporary group had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors but similar cardiac arrest duration and prehospital treatment (adrenaline administration and direct cardioversion). Rates of cardiogenic shock (48% vs 41%, p = 0.2) and decreased conscious state on arrival (77% vs 86%, p = 0.2) were similar in the 2 cohorts, as was the incidence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (33% vs 43%, p = 0.1). The contemporary cohort was more likely to receive therapeutic hypothermia (75% vs 0%, p <0.01), coronary angiography (77% vs 45%, p <0.01), and percutaneous coronary intervention (38% vs 23%, p = 0.03). This contemporary therapeutic strategy was associated with better survival to discharge (64% vs 39%, p <0.01) and improved neurologic recovery (57% vs 29%, p <0.01) and was the only independent predictor of survival (odds ratio 5.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 26.2, p = 0.03). Longer resuscitation time, presence of cardiogenic shock, and decreased conscious state were independent predictors of poor outcomes. In conclusion, modern management of OHCA, including therapeutic hypothermia and early coronary angiography is associated with significant improvement in survival to hospital discharge and neurologic recovery.     

Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in a geriatric rehabilitation hospital

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization, and the frequency of transmission is vital for the implementation of MRSA infection control measures in hospitals. We assessed risk factors for and rates of colonization of MRSA upon admission to a geriatric rehabilitation hospital, and studied the contribution of the colonization on hospital mortality. METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted over a 6-month period. All patients were screened at admission, using nasal and throat swabs. Whenever necessary, blood, sputum, urine, or wound cultures were obtained. Data collected on admission included age, sex, functional status, reasons for admission to the rehabilitation unit, previous hospitalizations, known carriage or infection with MRSA in previous hospitalizations, underlying diseases, prescribed antibiotics in previous hospitalization, serum albumin, creatinine clearance, and patient management data. Risk factors for MRSA carriage on admission were estimated by using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 337 patients admitted during the study period, 24 (7.1%) had a MRSA isolate, and 87.4% of these were detected through screening specimens only. Of the 24 positive admissions with MRSA, 23 (95.8%) were newly identified MRSA carriers. In the multivariate analysis, the following variables were highly associated with MRSA carriage: presence of tracheotomy (p =.0001), hospitalization for deconditioning (p =.007), renal failure (p =.039), and quinolone use prior to hospitalization (p =.037). The morbidity associated with MRSA was very low, and length of stay was not influenced by carriage. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MRSA carriage on admission to geriatric rehabilitation hospitals is high. Screening on admission is probably useful, as it detects almost all MRSA carriers. However, given the low morbidity associated with MRSA observed in this study, eradication of the MRSA carrier state is questionable. Further studies are needed to determine the usefulness and cost/benefit ratio of screening.     

Methicillin-resistant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Staphylococcus aureus</Emphasis>(MRSA) in rehabilitation and chronic-care-facilities: what is the best strategy?

Background

The risk associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been decreasing for several years in intensive care departments, but is now increasing in rehabilitation and chronic-care-facilities (R-CCF). The aim of this study was to use published data and our own experience to discuss the roles of screening for MRSA carriers, the type of isolation to be implemented and the efficiency of chemical decolonization.

Discussion

Screening identifies over 90% of patients colonised with MRSA upon admission to R-CCF versus only 50% for intensive care units. Only totally dependent patients acquire MRSA. Thus, strict geographical isolation, as opposed to "social reinsertion", is clearly of no value. However, this should not lead to the abandoning of isolation, which remains essential during the administration of care. The use of chemicals to decolonize the nose and healthy skin appeared to be of some value and the application of this procedure could make technical isolation unnecessary in a non-negligible proportion of cases.

Summary

Given the increase in morbidity associated with MRSA observed in numerous hospitals, the emergence of a community-acquired disease associated with these strains and the evolution of glycopeptide-resistant strains, the voluntary application of a strategy combining screening, technical isolation and chemical decolonization in R-CCF appears to be an urgent matter of priority.