Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.

PURPOSE: Patient response to hematopoietic progenitor-cell mobilizing regimens seems to vary considerably, making comparison between regimens difficult. To eliminate this inter-patient variability, we designed a cross-over trial and prospectively compared the number of progenitors mobilized into blood after granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) days 1 to 12 plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) days 7 to 12 (regimen G) with the number of progenitors after cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF days 3 to 14 (regimen C) in the same patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were randomized to receive either regimen G or C first (G1 and C1, respectively) and underwent two leukaphereses. After a washout period, patients were then crossed over to the alternate regimen (C2 and G2, respectively) and underwent two additional leukaphereses. The hematopoietic progenitor-cell content of each collection was determined. In addition, toxicity and charges were tracked. RESULTS: Regimen C (n = 50) resulted in mobilization of more CD34(+) cells (2.7-fold/kg/apheresis), erythroid burst-forming units (1.8-fold/kg/apheresis), and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (2.2-fold/kg/apheresis) compared with regimen G given to the same patients (n = 46; paired t test, P<.01 for all comparisons). Compared with regimen G, regimen C resulted in better mobilization, whether it was given first (P =.025) or second (P =.02). The ability to achieve a target collection of > or =2x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg using two leukaphereses was 50% after G1 and 90% after C1. Three of the seven patients in whom mobilization was poor after G1 had > or =2x10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg with two leukaphereses after C2. In contrast, when regimen G was given second (G2), seven out of 10 patients failed to achieve the target CD34(+) cell dose despite adequate collections after C1. Thirty percent of the patients (nine of 29) given regimen C were admitted to the hospital because of neutropenic fever for a median duration of 4 days (range, 2 to 10 days). The higher cost of regimen C was balanced by higher CD34(+) cell yield, resulting in equivalent charges based on cost per CD34(+) cell collected. CONCLUSION: We report the first clinical trial that used a cross-over design showing that high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF results in mobilization of more progenitors then GM-CSF plus G-CSF when tested in the same patient regardless of sequence of administration, although the regimen is associated with greater morbidity. Patients who fail to achieve adequate mobilization after regimen G can be treated with regimen C as an effective salvage regimen, whereas patients who fail regimen C are unlikely to benefit from subsequent treatment with regimen G. The cross-over design allowed detection of significant differences between regimens in a small cohort of patients and should be considered in design of future comparisons of mobilization regimens.     

Effects of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on myelosuppression induced by multiple cycles of high-dose chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer

In this study, 18 patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with multiple cycles of doxorubicin (75 or 90 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (750 or 1000 mg/m2) every 21 days. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (250 micrograms/m2 per day) was administered by continuous infusion during 10 days (days 2-12), starting in the first or second cycle of chemotherapy. Sixteen (89%) of 18 patients (95% confidence interval, 65%-99%) achieved an objective remission, five (28%) of which were complete. The median duration of response was 7 months. When GM-CSF was used for the first time, it had an effect on the kinetics of all blood cells, including neutrophils, lymphocytes, thrombocytes, and reticulocytes. However, in subsequent cycles of chemotherapy, the stimulatory effect of GM-CSF on hematopoiesis was substantially diminished. World Health Organization grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia necessitated dose reductions of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide from cycle 2 onward in all patients treated with the highest dose. Side effects of GM-CSF included fever, general weakness, and hypotension. These toxic effects mimicked sepsis, and hospital admission for treatment with intravenous antibiotics was required for 73 days in 61 cycles of chemotherapy that included GM-CSF. Dose-intensive chemotherapy produced a high response rate in patients with advanced breast cancer. However, GM-CSF administered from day 2 to day 12 at a dose of 250 micrograms/m2.     

Selective in vivo mobilization with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)/granulocyte-CSF as compared to G-CSF alone of dendritic cell progenitors from peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with advanced breast cancer undergoing autologous transplantation.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are potent antigen-presenting cells that are essential for the initiation of T cell-mediated immunity. DCs develop from myeloid progenitor populations under the influence of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and pass through an intermediate stage of maturation that is characterized by CD14 expression. Interest has focused on generating human-derived DCs for antigen-specific tumor vaccines to be used as adjuvant immunotherapy in minimal disease settings, such as after autologous transplantation. In the present study, mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) were obtained from 18 patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer preparing to undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. PBPCs mobilized in 10 patients with GM-CSF for 1 week, followed by the combination of GM-CSF and G-CSF, were compared with those obtained from patients receiving G-CSF alone with respect to the presence of DC progenitors and the capacity to generate functionally active mature DCs. PBPCs mobilized with GM-CSF/G-CSF were markedly enriched for CD14+ DC progenitor cells as compared with those mobilized with G-CSF alone. Consistent with an immature progenitor population, the CD14+ cells express Ki-67 antigen but not nonspecific esterase. CD14+ cells purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting from PBPCs mobilized with either regimen and cultured for 1 week in GM-CSF and interleukin-4 generated nearly pure populations of cells with characteristic DC phenotype and function. The addition of GM-CSF to the mobilization regimen resulted in greater yields of functionally active DCs for potential use in posttransplant immunotherapy.     

Phase II trial of high-dose liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in metastatic breast cancer. TLC D-99 Study Group.

PURPOSE: To estimate the toxicity and response rate of high-dose liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (TLC D-99, Evacet, The Liposome Company Inc, Princeton, NJ) in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two breast cancer patients with bidimensionally measurable metastatic disease and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease received a 135 mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) bolus of TLC D-99 with 5 microg/kg of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor via subcutaneous injection every 21 days. RESULTS: The median number of treatment cycles of TLC D-99 was three (range, one to 10 cycles), and the median total cumulative dose of TLC D-99 was 405 mg/m2 (range, 135 to 1,065 mg/m2). Grade IV neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and mucositis were experienced by 48 (92%), 46 (88%), and 10 (19%) patients, respectively. Twenty (38%) of patients experienced cardiac toxicity: four (8%) experienced a decrease of 20% or more in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to a final value > or = 50%, nine (17%) experienced a decrease of 10% or more in LVEF to a final value less than 50%, and seven (13%) developed symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF), including one patient who died of cardiomyopathy after receiving a total dose of 1,035 mg/m2. In a stepwise logistic regression model, the significant risk factors for the development of CHF were the cumulative dose of prior adjuvant doxorubicin (P = .007) and the total cumulative dose of TLC D-99 (P = .032). The overall response rate was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32% to 61%) on an intent-to-treat basis. The median duration of response was 7.4 months (95% CI, 6.1 to 19.6 months) and the median progression-free survival was 6.1 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 7.5 months). CONCLUSION: There was no added therapeutic benefit to the dose escalation of TLC D-99 in this study. A high rate of cardiotoxicity was also observed, especially among patients who had received prior adjuvant doxorubicin. This was probably attributable to the dose and schedule of TLC D-99 used in this trial, as well as the patient's lifetime cumulative doxorubicin dose. Administration of high-dose TLC D-99 at 135 mg/m2 every 3 weeks by i.v. bolus infusion does not warrant further investigation.     

Microsatellite instability predicts poor short-term survival in patients with advanced breast cancer after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: The purpose is to define molecular prognostic factors in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-nine patients with breast cancer and extensive lymph node (level III) and/or systemic metastases from a prospective single-center study of sequential HDCT/ASCT were studied. Microsatellite analysis was performed after laser microdissection using 15 markers selected for sensitive detection of microsatellite instability (MSI) in breast cancer. Exons 5-9 of the P53 gene were directly sequenced. Expression of P53, HER-2/neu, and the mismatch repair proteins hMSH2 and hMLH1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: MSI of at least three markers was detected in 13 of 39 patients (33%) and was predominantly found at tetranucleotide markers. All MSI-positive tumors showed normal expression of hMSH2 and hMLH1. Complete sequence analysis of exons 5-9 of the P53 gene was successful in 34 cases; 18% (n = 6) revealed a mutation. Overexpression of HER-2/neu and P53 was observed in 7 (22%) and 12 (46%) of 26 evaluated cases, respectively. The presence of MSI strongly correlated with shorter overall survival (OS; P = 0.0004) and progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.02). None of the other investigated clinical or molecular factors correlated with OS in univariate analyses, with the exception of menopausal status and previous adjuvant chemotherapy. Testing various multivariate Cox regression models, MSI remained a highly significant, independent, and adverse risk factor for OS. CONCLUSIONS: MSI is frequent in advanced breast cancer and could be an indicator of chemotherapy resistance and poor prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with HDCT/ASCT.     

A randomised phase II study of conventional versus accelerated infusional chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allows cycles of conventional bolus chemotherapy to be accelerated with reduction in treatment time and a boost in dose intensity. Theoretically, this approach could be hazardous with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy, since G-CSF-stimulated neutrophil proliferation would be occurring in the face of continuous S-phase active 5-FU. We performed this phase II randomised study to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of conventional 3-weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and continuous infusional 5-FU (infusional ECF) to an accelerated 2-weekly schedule with G-CSF support, in patients with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were randomised. with 14 in the accelerated arm. Patients received bolus epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (conventional arm) or every 2 weeks (accelerated arm) and 5-FU 200 mg/m2/day continuous infusion throughout. G-CSF 300 microg/day s.c. on days 10-12 was given each accelerated cycle. RESULTS: There were no treatment delays secondary to inadequate neutrophil or platelet recovery in either arm, with higher median day 1 neutrophil counts for each cycle in the accelerated arm compared with the conventional arm. Eighty-six per cent of the planned conventional chemotherapy cycles and 82% of the planned accelerated cycles were given. There were no major differences in toxicity between the arms, with the most common grade 3 toxicities being alopecia and stomatitis. Eight patients developed neutropenic sepsis (five in the accelerated arm and three in the conventional arm). Ten patients (77%) responded in the conventional arm and nine (64%) in the accelerated arm. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated infusional ECF with limited G-CSF support is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen with rapid haematological recovery. A 50% increase in relative dose intensity of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide is achieved, while overall treatment time is reduced by 33%.     

Defibrotide in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor significantly enhances the mobilization of primitive and committed peripheral blood progenitor cells in mice

Defibrotide is a polydeoxyribonucleotide, which significantly reduces the expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells. We investigated the activity of Defibrotide alone or in combination with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) in BALB/c mice. A 5-day treatment with Defibrotide alone (1-15 mg/mouse/day) had no effect on WBC counts, frequencies and absolute numbers of total circulating colony-forming cells (CFCs), i.e., granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units, erythroid burst-forming units, and multilineage colony-forming units. As compared with mock-injected mice, administration of rhG-CSF alone (5 micro g/mouse/day) for 5 days significantly (P < or = 0.0001) increased WBC counts, CFC frequencies, and CFC absolute numbers by 2-, 13-, and 27-fold, respectively. As compared with control mice, the combined administration of Defibrotide (15 mg/mouse/day) and rhG-CSF significantly (P < or = 0.0001) increased WBC counts, frequencies and absolute numbers of CFCs by 4-, 38-, and 119-fold, respectively. As compared with rhG-CSF alone, administration of Defibrotide plus rhG-CSF resulted in a significant increase (P < or = 0.001) of the frequency of circulating long-term culture-initiating cells. In addition, transplantation of 2 x 10(5) rhG-CSF- or Defibrotide/rhG-CSF-mobilized mononuclear cells rescued 43% and 71% of recipient mice, respectively. Experiments of CFC homing performed in lethally irradiated or nonirradiated recipients showed that marrow homing of transplanted PBPCs was reduced by 3-fold in Defibrotide-treated animals as compared with mock-injected mice (P < or = 0.001), suggesting that the mobilizing effect of Defibrotide might be because of an effect on PBPC trafficking. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that Defibrotide synergizes with rhG-CSF and significantly increases the mobilization of a broad spectrum of PBPCs, including primitive and committed progenitor cells. These data might have relevant implications for autologous and allogeneic anticancer therapy in humans.     

乳腺癌含紫杉类联合辅助化疗后常规骨髓支持治疗的随机对照研究

目的 评价国人采用含紫杉类药物的联合方案化疗加用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)骨髓支持后的临床效果.方法 72例Ⅱ、Ⅲ期原发性乳腺癌患者随机分为研究组33例和对照组39例,其中研究组TE/TEC(紫杉醇135 mg/m2 表柔比星60 mg/m2;多烯紫杉醇75 mg/m2 表柔比星60 mg/m2 环磷酰胺600 mg/m2)方案化疗后48小时加用G-CSF常规骨髓支持;对照组TE/TEC(同上)化疗后不加用G-CSF骨髓支持.化疗期间每周常规复查血常规及肝、肾功能,并详细观察记录化疗后的各种不良反应,对血常规、肝、肾功能等化疗髓内外毒副反应进行比较分析.结果 (1)研究组较对照组同时期骨髓造血功能恢复好,各化疗周期中第7、14及21天白细胞平均总数变化差异有显著性(P＜0.05).中性粒细胞绝对值平均总数变化与白细胞平均总数变化趋势一致.(2)各化疗周期中,研究组中粒细胞减少性发热出现率少于对照组,差异有显著性(P＜0.05).(3)倦怠、肌痛、腹泻等毒副反应出现率研究组少于对照组,两组比较差异有显著性(P＜0.05).结论 化疗后应用重组人粒细胞刺激因子G-CSF,可以缓解化疗药物,尤其是紫杉类药物对于骨髓的抑制作用,保护骨髓功能;并为经多种方案化疗后,病变进展的患者接受更有效的治疗方案提供了可能性.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells using regimen combining docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients

Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the mobilization of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells by combining docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(G-CSF) in breast cancer patients.Methods:A total of 57 breast cancer patients were treated with docetaxel 120 mg/m2.When the white blood cell(WBC) count decreased to 1.0×109/L,patients were given G-CSF 5-g/kg daily by subcutaneous injection until the end of apheresis.Peripheral blood mononuclear cells(MNC) were isolated by Cobe Spectra Apheresis System.The percentage of CD34+ cell was assayed by flow cytometry.Results:At a median 6 of days(range 3-8) after the administration of docetaxel,the median WBC count decreased to 1.08×109/L(range 0.20-2.31).The median duration of G-CSF mobilization was 3 days(range 2-7).The MNC collection was conducted 8-12 days(median 10 days) after docetaxel treatment.The median MNC was 5.35×108/kg(range 0.59-14.07),the median CD34+ cell count was 2.43×106/kg(range 0.16-16.69).The CD34+ cell count was higher than 1.00×106/kg in 47 of 57 cases(82.46%) and higher than 2.00×106/kg in 36 cases(63.16%).The CD34+ cell count was higher than 2.00×106/kg in 27 collections(23.68%).The MNC count and the CD34+ cell count were correlated with the bottom of WBC after docetaxel chemotherapy(r=0.364,0.502,P=0.005,0.000).The CD34+ cell count was correlated with the MNC count(r=0.597,P=0.000).The mobilization and apheresis were well tolerated in all patients.Mild perioral numbness and numbness of hand or feet were observed in 3 cases.No serious adverse events were reported.Conclusion:Mobilization of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell by combining docetaxel with G-CSF was effective and safety in breast cancer patients.     

重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子预防乳腺癌化疗后骨髓抑制的疗效分析

背景与目的：骨髓抑制是化疗最严重的不良反应,以中性粒细胞减少最常见。重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor,rhG-CSF)能诱导造血祖细胞向中性粒细胞分化,并调节中性粒细胞的功能活性,可用于肿瘤化疗后严重的中性粒细胞缺乏症,以保证原计划化疗方案的完成。本文旨在了解应用rhG-CSF治疗乳腺癌化疗后骨髓抑制的疗效以及预防性作用。方法：采用回顾性调查方法,筛选出在天津医科大学肿瘤医院进行多西紫杉醇(docetaxel)75 mg/m²、表柔比星(epirubicin) 65 mg/m²与环磷酰胺(cyclophosphamide)500 mg/m²(TEC)化疗方案的浸润性乳腺癌患者,在第1个周期末次给药后24~48 h内给予rhG-CSF为预防组,以24~48 h内未给予rhG-CSF为对照组,评估2组化疗后骨髓抑制的发生情况以及用药的安全性。结果：在预防组60例患者中,外周血白细胞(white blood cell,WBC)＜4.0×10⁹/L的发生率为25.0%,中性粒细胞绝对数(absolute neutrophil count,ANC)＜2.0×10⁹/L的发生率为23.3%;在对照组60例患者中,WBC＜4.0×10⁹/L的发生率为78.3%,ANC＜2.0×10⁹/L的发生率为73.3%,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。2组的化疗延迟率分别为5.0%和25.0%(P=0.002),化疗延迟时间分别为(2.33±0.58)d和(3.73±0.80)d(P=0.011),差异均有统计学意义。预防组发热性中性粒细胞减少症(febrile neutropenia,FN)的发生率为1.7%,对照组FN的发生率为20%,预防组明显低于对照组(P=0.001)。2组对血红蛋白(hemoglobin,Hb)与血小板(platelets,PLT)水平均无显著影响(P=0.547;P=0.285)。预防组rhG-CSF用药后不良反应的发生率为8.3%,而对照组为21.6%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.041)。结论：对于浸润性乳腺癌患者,在第一周期化疗后24~48 h内预防性给予rhG-CSF,能降低白细胞减少症的发生,减轻骨髓抑制的程度及持续时间,降低FN的发生风险,并且能减少rhG-CSF用药不良反应的发生。     

Ifosamide, epirubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a regimen for successful mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with multiple myeloma.

In general, the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients is poor and is achieved in most cases by combined cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. This study was performed to examine the efficacy of combined ifosfamide/epirubicine and G-CSF for PBPC mobilization and purging. Sixteen patients suffering from multiple myeloma in stage II/A and III/A according to Durie and Salmon underwent chemotherapy consisting of a total of three cycles of ifosfamide (3 g/m(2) on days 1 and 2 and epirubicine 80 mg/m(2) on day 1) and G-CSF (10 or 20 microg/kg body weight (BW) daily until harvesting). PBPC harvesting was performed after the first and third cycle of chemotherapy. The median number of PBPC after the first cycle of chemotherapy was 7.79 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg BW (ranging from 0.94-26.36 x 10(6)) and 6.38 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg BW (ranging from 0.79-29.31 x 10(6)) after the third cycle of chemotherapy. Clinical re-evaluation after three cycles of chemotherapy showed 13 (81 per cent) patients in partial remission (PR), two (12 per cent) in complete remission (CR) and one (6.25 per cent) in stable disease (SD). No major side-effects were observed, six patients developed hematological toxicity stage IV WHO for a median of 3.9 days but no serious infection episodes occurred. Combined ifosfamide/epirubicin and standard G-CSF is able to mobilize sufficient PBPC without serious side-effects for patients with MM and for purging procedures resulting in a high proportion of complete remissions after tandem high-dose melphalan chemotherapy.     

Treatment of advanced breast cancer with vinorelbine and docetaxel with or without human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

PURPOSE: A multicenter phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of docetaxel, vinorelbine with or without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1998 and March 1999, 57 patients participated in this trial. Forty-two patients received this combination as first-line and 15 patients as second-line chemotherapy, including 10 patients who had failed anthracyclines. Therapy consisted of vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 and docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Depending on the absolute neutrophil counts on the day of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration, a 5-day course of G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d was given. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 64.3% (95% confidence interval, 48.1% to 78.4%) in patients receiving docetaxel plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy, including eight complete (19%) and 19 partial remissions (45.3%); 11 patients (26.2%) had disease stabilization, and only four (9.5%) progressed. Second-line treatment with this regimen resulted in eight (53.3%) of 15 objective responses, four had stable disease, and three had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 12 months in the first-line and 9.8 months in the second-line setting, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 18 months, 38 patients (65%) were still alive with metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was commonly observed; World Health Organization grade 3 or 4 neutropenia both occurred in 18 patients (32%) and was complicated by septicemia in four cases; grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia was seen in two patients (4%), and grade 3 anemia was seen in only one patient (2%). Severe (grade 3) nonhematologic toxicity, except for alopecia, was rarely observed and included nausea/vomiting in two patients (4%), and stomatitis, peripheral neuropathy, and skin toxicity each in one patient. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that docetaxel and vinorelbine with or without G-CSF is an effective and fairly well tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. It might be particularly useful in patients previously exposed to adjuvant or palliative anthracyclines and/or alkylating agents.     

Effective treatment of advanced breast cancer with vinorelbine, mitomycin C plus human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

A phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine (VNB), mitomycin C (MMC), and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in advanced breast cancer. Between October 1992 and July 1994, 55 patients entered this trial. Nine patients had locally advanced disease and 46 had distant metastases, including 14 who had received previous palliative chemotherapy with (n = 9) or without anthracyclines (n = 5). Therapy consisted of VNB 40-50 mg m(-2) diluted in 250 ml saline infused over 30 min every 3 weeks, and MMC 15 mg m(-2) administered by intravenous bolus injection every 6 weeks. G-CSF was given at 5 microg kg(-1) day(-1) subcutaneously from days 2 to 7 following each cytotoxic drug administration. Treatment was continued in case of response or stable disease for a total of six courses. The overall response rate was 73% for all 55 patients (95% confidence interval, 59-84%), including 12 (22%) complete response (CR) and 28 (51%) partial response (PR); 13 patients (24%) had stable disease (SD), and only two (4%) progressed. All nine patients with locally advanced disease were rated responsive (two pCR, seven PR) and underwent surgery with curative intent. Eight out of nine remain disease free after a median observation period of 18 months (range, 13.5-28 months). Among the 32 previously untreated patients with metastatic disease, nine (28%) achieved CR, 15 PR (47%), seven SD (22%) and one PD (3%). Second-line chemotherapy with this regimen resulted in 7/14 (50%) objective remissions (one CR, six PR), six had SD and one PD. The median time to progression was 12 months (range, 2-24+ months) in previously untreated patients with disseminated disease, and 6.0 months (range, 2-22 months) in those who had failed prior chemotherapy. After a median follow-up time of 20 months, 24 patients with distant metastases are still alive with disease; median survival has not been reached yet. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression: six (11%) and ten patients (18%) had World Health Organization grade 3, and eight (14%) and nine patients (16%) had grade 4 leucopenia and granulocytopenia respectively. Severe (WHO grade 3) non-haematological toxicities included nausea/vomiting in 7%, constipation in 9%, peripheral neuropathy in 5%, infectious episodes in 7%, phlebitis due to drug extravasation in 5%, alopecia in 9%, and acute reversible pulmonary toxicity in 11%. Our data suggest that vinorelbine, mitomycin C plus G-CSF has an excellent anti-tumour activity in advanced breast cancer, probably superior to most other available combination chemotherapy regimens. This combination does not seem to present significant cross-resistance with previous CMF or anthracycline regimens. Apart from reversible, acute pulmonary toxicity, a rare adverse reaction that had previously been described for VNB, as well as the combination of natural vinca alkaloids with mitomycin C, and few episodes of grade 3 neurotoxicity (all of which occurred at the initial 50 mg m(-2) VNB dose level), the tolerance of this regimen seems acceptable and justifies further evaluation in front-line and salvage therapy of advanced breast cancer.     

Treatment of advanced breast cancer with docetaxel and gemcitabine with and without human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

PURPOSE: A multicenter Phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of combined docetaxel and gemcitabine +/- recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients participated in this trial, 51 of whom are evaluable for response. Thirty-eight patients received this combination as first-line chemotherapy, and 14 patients received this combination as second-line chemotherapy, including 10 patients who had failed anthracyclines. Therapy consisted of 1500 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 50 mg/m2 docetaxel, both administered on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. Depending on the absolute neutrophil counts on the day of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration, a 5-day course of 5 microg/kg G-CSF was given. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 60.5% (95% confidence interval, 43.4-75.9%) in patients receiving docetaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy, including 4 complete responses (10.5%) and 19 partial remissions (50%); 9 patients (24%) had disease stabilization, and only 5 (13%) progressed. Second-line treatment with this regimen resulted in 6 of 14 (43%) objective responses, 5 had stable disease, and 3 progressive disease. The median time to progression was 8.5 months in the first-line setting and 6.6 months in the second-line setting, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 15 months, 36 patients (69%) are still alive with metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was commonly observed; WHO grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, however, occurred in only 15 (29%) patients and was complicated by septicemia in 2 cases; grade 3 anemia was seen in 1 patient (2%). Severe (grade 3) nonhematological toxicity except for alopecia was rarely observed and included nausea/vomiting in 3 (6%), stomatitis in 2 (4%), anaphylaxis in 2, and peripheral neuropathy, skin toxicity, and increase of liver enzymes each in one patient. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that docetaxel and gemcitabine with and without G-CSF is an effective and fairly well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. It might be particularly useful in patients exposed previously to adjuvant or palliative anthracyclines and/or alkylating agents.     

Docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy: a multicenter phase II trial

Purpose: To investigate the activity of docetaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support (G-CSF) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with cisplatin. Patients and methods: A total of 60 patients with locoregional and metastatic NSCLC who had relapsed or progressed after first-line treatment with cisplatin-based regimens were enrolled into the trial. Docetaxel at 100 mg/m² was given as a 1-h infusion with G-CSF (rhG-CSF given s.c. at 150 μg/m²) support from day 2 to day 8 every 3 weeks; all patients received premedication with corticosteroids. Results: In all, 1 (1.6%) and 14 (23.3%) patients achieved a complete response (CR) and a partial response (PR), respectively, for an overall response rate of 25% (95% CI 14.0–35.9%); stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were documented in 18 (30%) and 27 (45%) patients, respectively. The median duration of response was 20 weeks and the median time to tumor progression was 28 weeks. The median overall survival was 32 weeks and the 1-year survival rate was 23%. A total of 263 courses were given at a median of 3 cycles/patient. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 11 (18%) and 14 (23%) patients, respectively, with 18 (30%) patients requiring hospitalization for neutropenic fever; 1 patient died of sepsis. Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 9 patients (15%) and grade 3 asthenia, in 4 (7%). Other toxicities were mild. Conclusions: Docetaxel has considerable single-agent activity in patients with NSCLC who have relapsed or progressed after first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin-based regimens. Received: 17 June 1998 / Accepted: 17 August 1998     

The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to increase the intensity of treatment with doxorubicin in patients with advanced breast and ovarian cancer

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given to 17 patients with advanced breast and ovarian cancer in order to increase the intensity and effectiveness of chemotherapy. Treatment with doxorubicin, at doses of 75 mg m-2 (n = 4 patients), 100 mg m-2 (n = 5), 125 mg m-2 (n = 6) and 150 mg m-2 (n = 2), was followed by infusion of G-CSF for 11 days. G-CSF administration resulted in a return of the absolute neutrophil count to normal or above normal levels within 12-14 days at all dose levels of doxorubicin used and allowed the administration of up to three cycles of high dose chemotherapy at 14 day intervals. An absolute neutrophil count greater than 2.5 x 10(9)l-1 was not reached until day 19-21 after 75 mg m-2 of doxorubicin given without G-CSF. At doses of doxorubicin of 125 mg m-2 and 150 mg m-2 all tumours regressed rapidly, although there was marked epithelial toxicity. The overall response rate in patients with advanced breast cancer was 80% with a median time to progression of 6 months. Two months after doxorubicin-G-CSF therapy there was a pronounced improvement of symptoms compared with before treatment. Thus the effectiveness of chemotherapy may be enhanced and treatment duration shortened by the use of G-CSF infusions. Further studies of this promising approach are warranted.     

Prognostic and predictive factors for patients with metastatic breast cancer undergoing aggressive induction therapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support.

PURPOSE: We performed a retrospective review to determine predictive and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic breast cancer who received induction therapy, and, if they responded to treatment, high-dose chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer received induction therapy with doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and methotrexate (AFM). Partial responders then received immediate high-dose chemotherapy, whereas those who achieved complete remission were randomized to immediate or delayed high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell support. We performed a retrospective review of data from these patients and used Cox proportional hazards regression models for analyses. RESULTS: The overall response rate for the 425 patients enrolled was 74% (95% confidence interval, 70% to 78%). Multivariate analysis of data from all 425 patients revealed that positive estrogen receptor status (P =.0041), smaller metastatic foci ( 2 cm) (P =. 0165), a longer disease-free interval from initial diagnosis to diagnosis of metastases ( 2 years) (P =.0051), and prior treatment with tamoxifen (P =.0152) were good prognostic signs for overall survival. Patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (P =.0001) and those who developed liver metastases (P =.0001) had decreased long-term survival. In the subgroup of responders to AFM induction, multivariate analysis showed that those with visceral metastases did less well (P =.0006), as did patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (P =.0023). However, those who had received tamoxifen therapy in the adjuvant setting did better (P =. 0143). CONCLUSION: The chance for long-term remission with induction therapy with AFM and high-dose chemotherapy is increased for hormone receptor positive-patients with nonvisceral metastases who have not received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and have long disease-free intervals.