Cholecalciferol enhances the anticonvulsant effect of conventional antiepileptic drugs in the mouse model of maximal electroshock

The interactions between cholecalciferol, a precursor of the active form of Vitamin D(3), and conventional antiepileptic drugs (valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital) were studied in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Vitamin D(3) applied i.p. at doses of 37.5 and 75 mug/kg, but not at 18.75 mug/kg, significantly raised the electroconvulsive threshold. Furthermore, cholecalciferol (at its highest subthreshold dose of 18.75 mug) potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of phenytoin and valproate. The action of carbamazepine and phenobarbital was also enhanced by Vitamin D(3), but when it was given at the higher dose of 37.5 mug/kg. Cholecalciferol, antiepileptic drugs, and their combinations did not produce significant adverse effects evaluated in the chimney test (motor coordination) and passive-avoidance task (long-term memory). Cholecalciferol did not significantly increase the brain concentrations of conventional antiepileptics, indicating a pharmacodynamic nature of revealed interactions. Our findings show that cholecalciferol may play an anticonvulsant role in the brain and can influence the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs, at least in experimental conditions.     

INFLUENCE OF 3-PPP, A SIGMA RECEPTOR LIGAND, ON THE ANTICONVULSIVE ACTION OF CONVENTIONAL ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS

(+)-3-(3-Hydroxyphenyl)-N-(1-propyl)-piperidine (3-PPP; a sigma receptor ligand), administered at 30 mg kg-1, 30 min before the test, significantly decreased the electroconvulsive threshold in mice, being ineffective in lower doses. 3-PPP (20 mg kg-1) diminished the protective activity of diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital and valproate, but not that of carbamazepine against maximal electroshock. The effect of 3-PPP upon the electroconvulsive threshold and the 3-PPP-induced inhibition of the protective action of antiepileptics was reversed by haloperidol (0.5 mg kg-1). Moreover, 3-PPP did not alter the total and free plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs, so a pharmacokinetic interaction is not probable. The combined treatment of 3-PPP with antiepileptic drugs, providing a 50% protection against maximal electroshock, did not affect motor performance in mice, although resulted in significant long-term memory deficits. Our data indicate that sigma receptor-mediated events may play some role in seizure processes in the central nervous system and can modulate the protective activity of some conventional antiepileptic drugs.     

Influence of sexual hormone antagonists on the anticonvulsant action of conventional antiepileptic drugs against electrically- and pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures in mice.

The present results refer to the action of three gonadal steroid antihormones, tamoxifen (TXF, an estrogen antagonist), cyproterone acetate (CYP, an antiandrogen) and mifepristone (MIF, a progesterone antagonist) on seizure phenomena in mice. TXF and CYP at their lowest protective dose in the electroconvulsive threshold test, enhanced the antiseizure efficacy of some antiepileptic drugs. TXF (20 mg/kg) potentiated the protective activity of valproate, diphenylhydantoin and clonazepam, but not that of carbamazepine or phenobarbital, against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions in female mice. CYP (40 mg/kg) enhanced the anticonvulsant action of valproate, carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin and clonazepam, but not that of phenobarbital, against maximal electroshock in male animals. MIF failed to affect the electroconvulsive threshold or the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in maximal electroshock. The effect of TXF or CYP upon the electroconvulsive threshold and on the action of antiepileptics was not reversed by sex steroid hormones (estradiol, testosterone, progesterone). However, the TXF-induced elevation of the electroconvulsive threshold was abolished by bicuculline, N-methyl-D-aspartic acid and kainic acid, and partially reversed by aminophylline, strychnine being ineffective in this respect. The action of CYP on the threshold for electroconvulsions was partially reversed by bicuculline and aminophylline. Both glutamatergic agonists and strychnine remained ineffective in this respect. Moreover, the action of TXF or CYP on the activity of antiepileptics was not influenced by strychnine, and reversed to various extents by the remaining convulsants. In contrast to maximal electroshock, none of the three antihormones affected the protective action of antiepileptic drugs against pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures in mice. Neither TXF nor CYP altered the free plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs, so a pharmacokinetic interaction is not probable. The combined treatment of the two antihormones with antiepileptic drugs, providing 50% protection against maximal electroshock, did not affect motor performance in mice, and did not result in significant long-term memory deficits. Our data indicate that steroid receptor-mediated events may be indirectly associated with seizure phenomena in the central nervous system and can modulate the protective activity of some conventional antiepileptic drugs.     

Effect of acutely and chronically administered venlafaxine on the anticonvulsant action of classical antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock model

The influence of acute and chronic treatments with intraperitoneal venlafaxine, a selective serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, on the anticonvulsant activity of selected antiepileptic drugs was studied in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Venlafaxine (12.5 and 25 mg/kg), given either acutely or chronically, significantly increased the electroconvulsive threshold. Moreover, both acute and chronic venlafaxine, applied at the highest subprotective dose of 6.25 mg/kg, enhanced the anticonvulsant effect of valproate, without affecting the protective action of carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin. The antidepressant did not affect brain concentration of valproate, indicating that the interaction between the two drugs seems pharmacodynamic in nature. Despite the lack of effect on the antielectroshock action of the remaining antiepileptics, acute venlafaxine increased the brain concentration of phenobarbital, while chronic venlafaxine reduced the brain level of phenytoin. In terms of adverse effects, acute/chronic venlafaxine and antiepileptic drugs alone, as well as their combinations, did not produce significant motor or long-term memory deficits in mice. Summing up, it seems that venlafaxine may be considered as a safe drug for the clinical use in patients with epilepsy and depressive disorders.     

Isobolographic analysis of interactions among losigamone analog AO-620 and two conventional antiepileptic drugs

In the present study, we investigated pharmacodynamic interactions among AO-620, a losigamone analog, and two conventional antiepileptic drugs, valproate (VPA) and phenobarbital (PB). Experiments were conducted in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Isobolographic analysis of the obtained data revealed pure additive interactions between AO-620 and PB applied at three dose ratios of 1:1, 1:3 and 3:1. Antagonism was observed when AO-620 was co-administered with VPAat the ratio of 3:1, while additive interactions were seen in two remaining proportions (1:3 and 1:1). Surprisingly, the interaction pattern of AO-620 appeared quite different from that of losigamone.     

Influence of the antagonist of the glycine site of NMDA receptors, MRZ 2/576, on the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs in mice

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the glycine site antagonist of the NMDA receptor, MRZ 2/576 (8-chloro-4-hydroxy-1-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridazino[4,5-b]quinolin-5-oxide choline salt), on the anticonvulsive activity of carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital and valproate against maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizures and ethosuximide, valproate and clonazepam against pentetrazole (PTZ)-induced seizures in mice. MRZ 2/576 applied intraperitoneally 5 min before electroconvulsions, at the dose of 10 and 15 mg/kg, significantly raised the convulsive threshold (from 6.9 to 8.8 and 10.8 mA respectively). At lower doses, it did not affect the threshold. MRZ 2/576 applied at the dose of 5, 10 and 20 mg/kg did not influence the clonic phase of PTZ-induced seizures, but protected the animals against the tonic phase. The anticonvulsant effect of a given antiepileptic drug was expressed as its ED(50) value (in mg/kg), which represents the dose of the drug required to protect 50% of animals against MES or PTZ seizures. MRZ2/576 co-administered at a subprotective dose (5 mg/kg) with carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital or valproate, significantly reduced their ED(50) values in MES test. Also, at the dose of 2.5 mg/kg it enhanced the protective activity of carbamazepine and valproate. At the lowest tested dose (1.25 mg/kg), it still potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of valproate. However, MRZ 2/576 (5 mg/kg) applied with valproate, ethosuximide or clonazepam did not influence their protective effects in the PTZ test. The combinations of MRZ 2/576 with almost every studied antiepileptic drug (providing a 50% protection against maximal electroshock or PTZ-induced seizures) did not produce motor impairment in the chimney test nor long-term memory deficit measured in the passive avoidance task. Only valproate alone or combined with MRZ 2/576 impaired both of these measures. It may be concluded that MRZ 2/576 enhanced the anticonvulsive activity of antiepileptic drugs against MES without accompanying potentiation of adverse effects. However, there was no positive interaction in the PTZ test. Finally, pharmacokinetic interactions do not seem responsible for the obtained results because MRZ 2/576 (5 mg/kg) did not alter the free plasma levels of the antiepileptics tested in the present study.     

Influence of chronic treatment with H1 receptor antagonists on the anticonvulsant activity of antiepileptic drugs.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of chronic astemizole and ketotifen administration on the anticonvulsant activity of antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions in mice. Adverse effects were evaluated in the chimney test (motor performance) and passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Brain and plasma levels of antiepileptics were measured by immunofluorescence. Astemizole (2 mg/kg) and ketotifen (8 mg/kg) significantly diminished the electroconvulsive threshold, being without effect upon this parameter at lower doses. Astemizole significantly reduced the anticonvulsant action of phenobarbital and diphenylhydantoin, but it did not affect that of carbamazepine and valproate. Moreover, ketotifen (at the subprotective dose of 4 mg/kg) remained without effect upon the protective activity of valproate, diphenylhydantoin or phenobarbital, but significantly diminished the anticonvulsant effect of carbamazepine. Histamine receptor antagonists combined with antiepileptic drugs, did not alter their brain and free plasma levels. Also, they did not influence adverse potential of carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin and valproate while that of phenobarbital was significantly enhanced. Valproate, phenobarbital and diphenylhydantoin alone at their ED50s against maximal electroshock or combined with the histamine receptor antagonists disturbed long-term memory. The results of this study indicate that H1 receptor antagonists, should be used with caution in epileptic patients.     

Influence of some beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on the anticonvulsant potency of antiepileptic drugs against audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice

The two enantiomers of propranolol antagonize generalized tonic-clonic seizures in DBA/2 mice with the (-)-enantiomer being about 1.5 times more potent than the (+)-enantiomer. Metoprolol was less active and atenolol was unable to affect audiogenic seizures. In combination with conventional antiepileptic drugs, both propranolol enantiomers tested in doses not affecting the occurrence of audiogenic seizures increased the anticonvulsant activity of diazepam, phenobarbital, valproate and lamotrigine and tended to increase that of carbamazepine and phenytoin. The effect was more pronounced with the (-)-enantiomer. This increase was associated with an enhancement of motor impairment, however, the therapeutic index of combined treatment of the antiepileptic drugs with both propranolol enantiomers was more favourable than the combination with saline alone. Metoprolol was also able to decrease the ED(50) values of the antiepileptic drugs, whereas atenolol showed no effects. Since neither enantiomer of propranolol significantly influenced the total and free plasma levels of the antiepileptics, pharmacokinetic interactions are not likely. In addition, (+)- and (-)-propranolol did not significantly affect the hypothermic effects of the antiepileptics tested. In conclusion, both enantiomers of propranolol and metoprolol showed an additive anticonvulsant effect when co-administered with some conventional antiepileptic drugs, most notably diazepam, phenobarbital, lamotrigine and valproate, implicating a possible therapeutic relevance of such drug combinations.     

Perspectives of losigamone in epilepsy treatment

Patients with drug resistant epilepsy represent about 40% of the whole population of epileptic patients. These patients require more than one antiepileptic drug. In animal models of epilepsy, it is possible to determine which combinations produce supra-additive anticonvulsive effects with minimal or even no adverse reactions. The experimental data can be helpful for predicting effective drug combinations in patients with refractory epilepsy. Losigamone is a new antiepileptic drug with an unknown mechanism of action. The drug belongs to the group of beta-methoxy-butenolides, and exists as a racemic mixture of two enantiomers (AO-242 and AO-294). The drug is eliminated by oxidation. Cytochrome CYP2A6 appears to be the main isoenzyme responsible for the metabolism of losigamone. In vitro, losigamone exerts anticonvulsant activity in the picrotoxin model in CA1 and CA3 hippocampal areas, the low Ca(2+) model in CA1 area and the low Mg(2+) model in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus. In vivo, the drug exhibits significant efficacy against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in rodents and pentetrazole-induced clonic convulsions in mice. Potency of losigamone varies with the respective seizure test, animal species used in experiments and route of drug administration. Toxicity studies do not indicate any teratogenic risk of the drug, at least in animals. In clinical trial, losigamone proved to have satisfactory effectiveness and good tolerance in the treatment of partial and secondary generalized seizures. The enantiomer AO-242 seems to be more potent than AO-294 or racemate.     

Acute and chronic treatment with mianserin differentially affects the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock model

Rationale Epilepsy often coexists with depression. Therefore, the probability of simultaneous treatment with antiepileptics and antidepressants and the possibility of interactions between them are relatively high. Objective The effects of acute and chronic administration of mianserin on the protective activity of valproate (VPA), carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital were evaluated in the maximal electroshock in mice. Materials and methods Animals were subjected to electroconvulsions. Undesired effects were evaluated in the chimney test (motor impairment) and passive-avoidance task (memory deficit). Brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were assessed by immunofluorescence. Results When given acutely, mianserin (at doses greater than or equal to 20 mg/kg) significantly raised the electroconvulsive threshold. The antidepressant, at the subanticonvulsant doses, enhanced the anticonvulsant action of carbamazepine, phenytoin, and VPA. Mianserin administered chronically at 30 mg/kg significantly decreased the electroconvulsive threshold. In contrast to acute treatment, the antidepressant at subeffective doses diminished the anticonvulsant activity of VPA and phenytoin. Mianserin given either acutely or chronically did not affect the brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs, so a pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed interactions is not probable. Acute and chronic treatment with mianserin and its combinations with antiepileptic drugs did not impair either motor coordination or long-term memory. Conclusion Although acute application of mianserin may potentiate the anticonvulsant action of some antiepileptics, its chronic administration can lead to the opposite effect. Therefore, as far as the presented results can be transferred to clinical conditions, the antidepressant therapy with mianserin should be limited or even avoided in epileptic patients.     

Influence of D(-)CPP and (+/-)CPP upon the protective action of conventional antiepileptic drugs against electroconvulsions in mice

Competitive antagonists of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, D(-) CPP (up to 0.625 mg/kg) and (+/-)CPP (up to 0.625 mg/kg), did not influence the electroconvulsive threshold in mice. At a dose of 1.25 mg/kg, both drugs significantly elevated the threshold. D(-)CPP (0.625 mg/kg) and (+/-)CPP (0.625 mg/kg) potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of valproate, carbamazepine and phenobarbital. No potentiation was observed in the case of diphenylhydantoin. Moreover, these competitive NMDA antagonists did not influence the plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs, so a pharmacokinetic interaction, in terms of total and free plasma levels at least, is not probable. The combined treatment of both CPP agents with either carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin or phenobarbital (providing a 50% protection against maximal electroshock) was devoid of significant side effects (in the tests evaluating motor and long-term memory impairment). Valproate co-administered with CPP compounds caused a moderate motor impairment, but did not affect cognitive functions in mice. It is noteworthy that valproate and phenobarbital given alone at doses equal to their ED50s resulted in significant long-term memory deficit. The results indicate that combinations of antiepileptic drugs with some NMDA receptor antagonists, apart from enhanced anticonvulsant potential, may not necessarily result in the occurrence of considerable adverse reactions.     

Propranolol and metoprolol enhance the anticonvulsant action of valproate and diazepam against maximal electroshock.

The anticonvulsive potential of classical antiepileptics co-administered with beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists against generalized tonic-clonic seizures was evaluated in the model of maximal electroshock (MES)-induced convulsions. Propranolol, acebutolol, metoprolol and atenolol were tested in the doses not affecting the electroconvulsive threshold. Propranolol and metoprolol lowered the ED(50) of valproate and diazepam. Acebutolol reduced valproate's but not diazepam's ED(50) value. In contrast, hydrophilic atenolol, not penetrating via blood-brain barrier, affected neither the action of valproate nor diazepam. None of the studied drugs changed the protective activity of carbamazepine and phenytoin against MES. beta-blockers per se did not alter the motor performance of mice. Moreover, propranolol and metoprolol did not influence diazepam-evoked impairment of locomotor activity. The free plasma and brain levels of antiepileptic drugs were not affected by beta-blockers. In conclusion, the use of certain beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, such as propranolol and metoprolol, might improve the antiepileptic potential of valproate and diazepam.     

Influence of flunarizine, nicardipine and nimodipine on the anticonvulsant activity of different antiepileptic drugs in mice.

Only flunarizine (40 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly raised the threshold for electroconvulsions in mice (ear-clip electrodes, 0.2 sec stimulus duration, tonic hindlimb extension as an endpoint), whilst nicardipine and nimodipine (up to 80 mg/kg) was ineffective in this respect. Further, flunarizine (10 and 20 mg/kg) potentiated the efficacy of carbamazepine and valproate against maximum electroshock (50 mA)-induced seizures and, in the dose of 20 mg/kg, enhanced that of diphenylhydantoin. In addition, this calcium channel inhibitor was without influence upon the total levels of these antiepileptics in plasma. Nicardipine (5 and 10 mg/kg) and nimodipine (10 and 20 mg/kg) increased the protective potential of carbamazepine and nimodipine (20 mg/kg) also decreased the ED50 of diphenylhydantoin against maximum electroshock. However, nicardipine distinctly increased the level of carbamazepine in plasma, whilst nimodipine did not affect the level of both antiepileptics in plasma. The combined treatment of calcium channel inhibitors and antiepileptic drugs, providing a 50% protection against maximum electroshock, did not significantly change the motor performance of mice in the chimney test, when compared with antiepileptic drugs, given alone at their ED50s, against maximum electroshock-induced convulsions. The present results give further support to the idea of the combined use of some calcium channel inhibitors and antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of human epilepsy.     

Influence of antazoline and ketotifen on the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptics against maximal electroshock in mice.

Experimental studies have indicated that the central histaminergic system plays an important role in the inhibition of seizures through the stimulation of histamine H1 receptors. H1 receptor antagonists, including classical antiallergic drugs, occasionally may induce convulsions in healthy children and patients with epilepsy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of antazoline and ketotifen (two H1 receptor antagonists) on the anticonvulsant activity of antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock (MES)-induced convulsions in mice. The following antiepileptic drugs were used: valproate, carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin and phenobarbital. In addition, the effects of antiepileptic drugs alone or in combination with antazoline or ketotifen were studied on long-term memory (tested in the passive avoidance task) and motor performance (evaluated in the chimney test), acutely and after 7-day treatment with these H1 receptor antagonists. The influence of antazoline and ketotifen on the free plasma and brain levels of the antiepileptics was also evaluated. Antazoline (at 0.5 mg/kg), given acutely and after 7-day treatment, significantly diminished the electroconvulsive threshold. Similarly, ketotifen, after acute and chronic doses of 8 mg/kg markedly reduced the threshold for electroconvulsions. In both cases, antazoline and ketotifen were without effect upon this parameter at lower doses. Antazoline (0.25 mg/kg) significantly raised the ED50 value of carbamazepine against MES (both, acutely and after 7-day treatment). Furthermore antazoline (0.25 mg/kg) also reduced the anticonvulsant activity of diphenylhydantoin, but only after repeated administration, without modifying the brain and free plasma level of this drug. Moreover, valproate and phenobarbital did not change their protective activity when combined with antazoline. Ketotifen (4 mg/kg) possessed a biphasic action, acutely it enhanced the anticonvulsant action of carbamazepine and phenobarbital while, following 7-day treatment, reduced the antiseizure activity of carbamazepine. Ketotifen did not affect the free plasma or brain levels of antiepileptics tested. Only acute antazoline (0.25 mg/kg) applied with valproate impaired the performance of mice evaluated in the chimney test. Ketotifen (4 mg/kg) co-administered with conventional antiepileptic drugs impaired motor coordination in mice treated with valproate, phenobarbital or diphenylhydantoin. Acute and chronic antazoline (0.25 mg/kg) alone or in combination with antiepileptic drugs did not disturb long-term memory, tested in the passive avoidance task. Similarly, ketotifen (4 mg/kg) did not impair long-term memory, acutely and after 7-day treatment. However, valproate alone or in combination with chronic ketotifen (4 mg/kg) worsened long-term memory. The results of this study indicate that H1 receptor antagonists, crossing the blood brain barrier, should be used with caution in epileptic patients. This is because antazoline reduced the protective potential of diphenylhydantoin and carbamazepine. Also, ketotifen reduced the protection offered by carbamazepine and elevated the adverse activity of diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital and valproate.     

Chronically administered fluoxetine enhances the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock model

Interactions between chronically administered fluoxetine and valproate, carbamazepine, phenytoin, or phenobarbital were studied in the maximal electroshock test in mice. Fluoxetine administered for 14 days at doses up to 20 mg/kg failed to affect the electroconvulsive threshold. Nevertheless the drug (at 15 and 20 mg) enhanced the anticonvulsant activity of valproate, carbamazepine, and phenytoin. When applied at 20 mg/kg, it potentiated the protective action of phenobarbital. Fluoxetine, antiepileptic drugs, and their combinations did not produce significant adverse effects evaluated in the chimney test (motor coordination) and passive-avoidance task (long-term memory). Chronically applied fluoxetine significantly increased the brain concentrations of valproate, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin, indicating a pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed pharmacodynamic interactions. In conclusion, long-term treatment with fluoxetine exhibited some favorable effects on the anticonvulsant properties of conventional antiepileptic drugs, resulting, however, from pharmacokinetic interactions.     

Fluoxetine enhances the anticonvulsant effects of conventional antiepileptic drugs in maximal electroshock seizures in mice

The present study was designed to investigate the effects of fluoxetine (FXT), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, on the effect of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the maximal electroshock seizure (MES) model in mice. FXT at the doses of 25, 20 and 15 mg/kg significantly increased the electroconvulsive threshold. The antidepressant applied at the lower doses (10, 5 and 2.5 mg/kg) did not influence the threshold. Moreover, FXT (at the highest subprotective dose of 10 mg/kg) increased the anticonvulsive potential of carbamazepine (CBZ), diphenylhydantoin (DPH), valproate (VPA) and phenobarbital (PB), producing a dose-related decrease in their ED50 values against MES. Nevertheless, pharmacokinetic events may be involved in the interaction between FXT and PB or CBZ, since the antidepressant raised the total brain concentration of the two antiepileptics. FXT in combination with AEDs did not influence the motor performance in the chimney test and long-term memory. In conclusion, the data suggest that FXT modulates seizure processes in the brain and may be advantageous in the treatment of epilepsy in depressed patients, improving the seizure control in epilepsy.     

Imperatorin enhances the protective activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

The effects of imperatorin (8-isopentenyloxypsoralen; 9-(3-methylbut-2-enyloxy)-7H-furo[3,2-g]chromen-7-one) on the anticonvulsant activity of four conventional antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin and valproate) were studied in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model. Results indicate that imperatorin (30 and 40 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of carbamazepine against maximal electroshock-induced seizures by reducing its median effective dose (ED(50)) from 10.3 to 6.8 (by 34%; P<0.05) and 6.0 mg/kg (by 42%; P<0.01), respectively. Similarly, imperatorin (40 mg/kg, i.p.) markedly enhanced the antielectroshock action of phenobarbital and phenytoin, by lowering their ED(50) values from 19.6 to 12.2 mg/kg (by 38%; P<0.05-phenobarbital) and from 12.8 to 8.5 mg/kg (by 34%; P<0.05-phenytoin) in the maximal electroshock seizure test. In contrast, imperatorin (40 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect the protective action of valproate against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. Imperatorin at lower doses of 20 and 30 mg/kg had no significant effect on the anticonvulsant activities of conventional antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of interaction between imperatorin (30 mg/kg, i.p.) and carbamazepine (6.8 mg/kg, i.p.) revealed a significant increase in total brain carbamazepine concentration after imperatorin administration, indicating a pharmacokinetic nature of interaction between these drugs. In cases of phenobarbital and phenytoin, imperatorin (40 mg/kg, i.p.) did not alter significantly total brain concentrations of phenytoin and phenobarbital in mice, and thus, the observed interactions in the maximal electroshock seizure test between imperatorin and phenobarbital or phenytoin were pharmacodynamic in nature. The present study demonstrates that imperatorin enhanced the antiseizure effects of carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin in the mouse maximal electroshock seizure model. However, the combination of imperatorin with carbamazepine, despite its beneficial effects in terms of seizure suppression in mice, was complicated by a pharmacokinetic increase in total brain carbamazepine concentration in experimental animals. In contrast, the combinations of imperatorin with phenytoin and phenobarbital, due to their beneficial antiseizure effects and no pharmacokinetic interactions between drugs in the brain compartment of experimental animals, deserve more attention and are of pivotal importance for epileptic patients as advantageous combinations from a clinical viewpoint.     

2-Methyl-6-phenylethynyl-pyridine (MPEP), a non-competitive mGluR5 antagonist,differentially affects the anticonvulsant activity of four conventional antiepileptic drugs against amygdala-kindled seizures in rats

2-Methyl-6-phenylethynyl-pyridine (MPEP), a selective noncompetitive mGluR5 antagonist, influences the action of conventional antiepileptic drugs in amygdala-kindled seizures in rats. MPEP alone (up to 40 mg/kg) did not affect any seizure parameter. Moreover, the common treatment of MPEP with either carbamazepine or phenytoin (administered at subeffective doses) did not result in any anticonvulsant action in kindled rats. However, when combined with subprotective doses of valproate or phenobarbital, MPEP significantly shortened seizure and afterdischarge durations. Importantly, combinations of MPEP with the two antiepileptics did not have the adverse effects of impaired motor performance or long-term memory in rats. Our data indicate that MPEPmay positively interact with some conventional antiepileptic drugs in the amygdala-kindling model of complex partial seizures.     

Assessment of drug–drug interactions between moxonidine and antiepileptic drugs in the maximal electroshock seizure test in mice

Hypertension is a common comorbid condition with epilepsy, and drug interactions between antihypertensive and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are likely in patients. Experimental studies showed that centrally active imidazoline compounds belonging to antihypertensive drugs can affect seizure susceptibility. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of moxonidine, an I₁-imidazoline receptor agonist, on the anticonvulsant efficacy of numerous AEDs (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, valproate, phenytoin, oxcarbazepine, topiramate and lamotrigine) in the mouse model of maximal electroshock. Besides, the combinations of moxonidine and AEDs were investigated for adverse effects in the passive avoidance task and the chimney test. Drugs were administered intraperitoneally (ip). Moxonidine at doses of 1 and 2 mg/kg ip did not affect the convulsive threshold. Among tested AEDs, moxonidine (2 mg/kg) potentiated the protective effect of valproate against maximal electroshock. This interaction could be pharmacodynamic because the brain concentration of valproate was not significantly changed by moxonidine. The antihypertensive drug did not cause adverse effects when combined with AEDs. This study shows that moxonidine may have a neutral or positive effect on the anticonvulsant activity of AEDs in patients with epilepsy. The enhancement of the anticonvulsant action of valproate by moxonidine needs further investigations to elucidate potential mechanisms involved.     

Comparison of the effects of losigamone and its isomers on maximal electroshock induced convulsions in mice and on three different patterns of low magnesium induced epileptiform activity in slices of the rat temporal cortex

Summary Losigamone (AO-33) is a recemate of a tetronic acid derivative. The effects of losigamone and its three isomers (AO-242, AO-294 and AO-23) were compared on maximal electroshock (MES) induced convulsions in mice and on different patterns of extracellularly recorded, low Mg ²⁺ induced epileptiform activity in slices of the rat temporal cortex. Lowering Mg ²⁺ induced recurrent short discharges in areas CA3 and CA1 while ictaform events that lasted for many seconds were induced in the entorhinal cortex. In the hippocampus the activity stayed stable over a number of hours. In contrast, the ictaform events in the entorhinal cortex changed their characteristics after one to two hours to recurrent discharges of 0.8 to 10 s. Afterdischarges and interictal events were absent. 50 M AO-242 showed a similar efficacy to 50 M AO-33 in reducing and blocking epileptiform discharges in areas CA1 and CA3 while 50 M AO-294 and 50 M AO-23 had weaker effects than 50 M AO-33. Concentrations of 50 M and 100 M AO-242 showed a similar efficacy to AO-33 on ictaform events in the entorhinal cortex. Late recurrent discharges were also blocked by AO-33 and AO-242 although at higher concentrations (300 M). The in vitro observations are with respect to order of efficacy in accordance with the in vivo data obtained in the maximal electroshock test in mice. The order of potency in the MES test was AO-242>AO-33AO-294 AO-23. The results show that the erythro-isomer AO-23, although active, is much less potent than AO-33. Of the two optical isomers of losigamone the (+) isomer AO-242 is more active than the (–) form AO-294. Send offprint requests to C. L. Zhang at the above address