Phase I study of paclitaxel in combination with a multidrug resistance modulator, PSC 833 (Valspodar), in refractory malignancies.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel when given with PSC 833 (valspodar) to patients with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were initially treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) over 3 hours. Subsequently, 29 hours of treatment with CIVI PSC 833 was started 2 hours before paclitaxel treatment was initiated. In this combination, the starting dose of paclitaxel was 52.5 mg/m(2). Paclitaxel doses were escalated by 17.5 mg/m(2) increments for four subsequent cohorts. Each cohort consisted of three patients with the exception of the last cohort, which consisted of six patients. Data for the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel with and without concurrent PSC 833 administration were obtained. RESULTS: All 18 patients completed at least one course of concurrent treatment (median, two courses; range, one to six) and were evaluable for toxicity. The MTD for paclitaxel with PSC 833 was 122.5 mg/m(2). Neutropenia was the DLT. All patients had PSC 833 blood concentrations greater than 1, 000 ng/mL before, during, and 24 hours after the paclitaxel infusion. PSC 833 produced small increases in the paclitaxel peak plasma concentrations and areas under the concentration-time curve. However, PSC 833 greatly prolonged the terminal phase of paclitaxel, resulting in plasma paclitaxel concentrations of more than 0.05 micromol/L for much longer than expected. As a result, myelosuppression was comparable to that produced by full-dose paclitaxel given without PSC 833. Of the 16 patients who were assessable for response, one patient experienced a partial response and an additional nine patients experienced disease stabilization after paclitaxel treatment alone. CONCLUSION: Treatment with paclitaxel 122.5 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour CIVI concurrent with a 29-hour CIVI of PSC 833 results in acceptable toxicity. The addition of PSC 833 alters the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, which explains the enhanced neutropenia experienced by patients treated with this drug combination.     

A phase I and pharmacologic study of idarubicin, cytarabine, etoposide, and the multidrug resistance protein (MDR1/Pgp) inhibitor PSC-833 in patients with refractory leukemia

This study was conducted to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of idarubicin when administered with and without the P-glycoprotein inhibitor PSC-833 in combination with cytarabine, and etoposide. Fifteen patients with relapsed and refractory acute leukemia were enrolled and received cytarabine as a 7-day continuous infusion, with etoposide and idarubicin administered for any three consecutive days during the cytarabine infusion. Two hours prior to the second dose of idarubicin, PSC-833 administration was initiated. The pharmacokinetics of idarubicin alone and with PSC-833 was assessed at three idarubicin dose levels (6, 8 and 10 mg/m(2)). The MTD of idarubicin in this combination was 8 mg/(m(2) day) with a DLT of oral mucositis. The complete remission rate (on an intent-to-treat basis) for this regimen was 33%, with a median duration of 6 months. The clearance of idarubicin was 140 +/- 200 and 181 +/- 94.3 l/h for idarubicin alone and with PSC-833, respectively. The volume of distribution of the central compartment was 423 +/- 443 and 337 +/- 394 l for idarubicin alone and in combination with PSC-833, respectively. This combination including PSC-833 was well tolerated. Although a pharmacokinetic interaction might have been expected, PSC-833 did not significantly alter the disposition of idarubicin.     

A phase I trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and valspodar (PSC 833), a modulator of multidrug resistance.

PURPOSE: P-glycoprotein is an efflux pump for many drugs including doxorubicin and paclitaxel. This study evaluated the coadministration of these drugs with the P-glycoprotein inhibitor valspodar (PSC 833) with the aim of determining: (a) maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel (DP); (b) the MTD of DP combined with PSC 833 (DPV), without and with filgrastim (G-CSF); and (c) the pharmacokinetic interactions of PSC 833 with doxorubicin and paclitaxel. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: For the first cycle, patients received doxorubicin as a 15-min infusion followed by paclitaxel as a 1-h infusion. For the second cycle, patients received reduced doses of DP with PSC 833 at 5 mg/kg p.o., four times a day for 12 doses. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with various refractory malignancies were enrolled and assessable. The MTD of DP without PSC 833 was 35 mg/m(2) doxorubicin and 150 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. The MTD of DPV without G-CSF was 12.5 mg/m(2) doxorubicin and 70 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. The dose-limiting toxicity for both DP and DPV was neutropenia without thrombocytopenia. With G-CSF, the MTD for DPV was 20 mg/m(2) doxorubicin and 90 mg/m(2) paclitaxel. No grade 4 nonhematological toxicities were observed. Five partial and two minor tumor remissions were observed. Paired pharmacokinetics with and without PSC 833 revealed substantial drug interactions with both doxorubicin and paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: PSC 833 can be administered safely with doxorubicin and paclitaxel. The pharmacokinetic profiles of these drugs are significantly affected by PSC 833, requiring approximately 60% dose reductions for equivalent degrees of myelosuppression.     

Combined action of PSC 833 (Valspodar), a novel MDR reversing agent, with mitoxantrone, etoposide and cytarabine in poor-prognosis acute myeloid leukemia.

PSC 833 (Valspodar) can reverse multidrug resistance (MDR) in patients with hematologic malignancies, but alters the pharmacokinetics of concomitant anticancer agents. A phase I, dose-finding study was initiated to define a safe and effective regimen of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) when administered with PSC 833 to patients with early relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Poor-prognosis AML patients refractory to first-line induction therapy or relapsing within 9 months of attaining complete remission (CR) were treated with cytarabine (1.0 g/m2/day), etoposide (30 mg/m2/day), and mitoxantrone at a dose of either 3.0 mg/m2/day (cohort 1) or 4.5 mg/m2/day (cohorts 2 and 3) for 6 days plus continuous-infusion PSC 833 (10 mg/kg/24 h with a 2.0 mg/kg loading dose) for 6 or 7 days each 21-day cycle. Patients achieving CR were given a 4-day MEC plus PSC 833 consolidation cycle. Twenty-three patients were enrolled (eight with primary refractory AML and 15 in relapse). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in one of six patients in cohort 2 (grade 4 mucositis) and one of seven patients in cohort 3 (grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia). The maximum tolerated dose of mitoxantrone was defined as 4.5 mg/m2/day. Clinically significant grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia, possibly related to PSC 833, occurred in four patients. Hematologic toxicities were as expected in this patient population, but were not dose limiting. Mild to moderate cerebellar ataxia and paresthesia occurred in six (26%) and five (22%) patients, respectively, but were not dose limiting. Overall, six of 23 (26%) patients achieved CR, including five patients with demonstrated P-glycoprotein expression and/or function. The median overall survival was 4 months. All six patients with a CR were alive and four (17%) patients were disease free at 12 months. Blood levels of PSC 833 were well above the target level of 1000 ng/ml, a concentration that is known to reverse MDR in vitro. PSC 833 reduced the clearance of etoposide by approximately two-fold. No correlation was observed between the mitoxantrone or etoposide area under the curve and response. In conclusion, the MEC plus PSC 833 tested regimen was well tolerated and the 26% CR rate warrants further testing of this regimen in a randomized, phase III trial.     

A phase I study of induction chemotherapy for older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) using mitoxantrone, etoposide, and the MDR modulator PSC 833: a southwest oncology group study 9617

Older patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) have overexpression of P-glycoprotein (Pgp+), and this has been shown to correlate quantitatively with therapeutic outcome. Since Pgp-mediated efflux of cytotoxic drugs can be inhibited by the cyclosporine analogue, PSC 833, we investigated the use of this agent with a 5-day mitoxantrone/etoposide regimen in patients over age 55 with newly diagnosed AML. Previous studies suggested a 33% incidence of grade IV/V non-hematologic toxicity with the use of mitoxantrone 10 mg/M(2) and etoposide 100 mg/M(2), each for 5 days, in this patient population. Since PSC 833 alters the pharmacokinetic excretion of MDR-related cytotoxins, this phase I dose-finding study was performed to identify doses of mitoxantrone/etoposide associated with a similar 33% incidence of grade IV/V non-hematologic toxicity, when given with PSC 833. Mitoxantrone/etoposide (M/E) doses were escalated in fixed ratio from a starting dose of M: 4 mg/M(2) and E: 40 mg/M(2), to M: 7 mg/M(2) and E: 70 mg/M(2), in successive cohorts of eight patients each. PSC 833 was well tolerated and the MTD of this M/E regimen with PSC 833 in this population was M: 6 mg/M(2) and E: 60 mg/M(2). The complete response (CR) rate for all patients was 50% (15/30) and was considerably higher for de novo than for secondary AML. These data suggest that the addition of PSC 833 to an M/E regimen for older patients with untreated AML is well tolerated but requires a reduction in M/E dosing to avoid increased toxicity.     

Phase I/II study of the P-glycoprotein modulator PSC 833 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, pharmacokinetic interaction, and activity of PSC 833 compared with daunorubicin (DNR) and cytarabine in patients with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received ara-C 3 g/m(2)/d on 5 consecutive days, followed by an IV loading dose of PSC 833 (1.5 mg/kg) and an 84-hour continuous infusion escalating from 6, 9, or 10 mg/kg/d. Daunorubicin was administered as a 72-hour continuous infusion at 34 or 45 mg/m2/d [corrected]. Responding patients received consolidation chemotherapy with DNR pharmacokinetics performed without PSC-833 on day 1, and with PSC-833 on day 4. Response was correlated with expression of P-glycoprotein and lung resistance protein (LRP), and in vitro sensitization of leukemia progenitors to DNR cytotoxicity by PSC 833. RESULTS: All 43 patients are assessable for toxicity and response. Grade 3 or greater hyperbilirubinemia (70%) was the only dose-dependent toxicity. Four patients (9%) succumbed to treatment-related complications. Twenty-one patients (49%) achieved a complete remission or restored chronic phase, including 10 of 20 patients treated at the maximum-tolerated dose of 10 mg/kg/d of PSC-833 and 45 mg/m(2) of DNR. The 95% confidence interval for complete response was 33.9% to 63.7%. Administration of PSC 833 did not alter the mean area under the curve for DNR, although clearance decreased approximately two-fold (P =.04). Daunorubicinol clearance decreased 3.3-fold (P =.016). Remission rates were not effected by mdr-1 expression, but LRP overexpression was associated with chemotherapy resistance. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment with infused PSC 833 and DNR is well tolerated and has activity in patients with poor risk acute myeloid leukemia. Administration of PSC 833 delays elimination of daunorubicinol, but yields variable changes in DNR systemic exposure.     

A phase I dose escalation of combination chemotherapy with granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor in patients with neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND: Dose intensity is important in the response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced neuroblastoma. The aim of the current study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of a combination chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of patients with recurrent neuroblastoma and peripheral neuroepithelioma (primitive neuroectodermal tumor [PNET]) and whether the use of growth factor would allow increased dose intensity. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients diagnosed with recurrent neuroblastoma or PNET were treated with a combination chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin, 160 mg/m(2)/96 hours; doxorubicin, 40 mg/m(2)/96 hours; and escalated doses of etoposide and ifosfamide. Granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) was administered beginning 24 hours after the completion of the chemotherapy. Courses were repeated at 28-day intervals. Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined the interval between courses was shortened by administering the next course as soon as the patient's neutrophil and platelet counts had recovered to > 1500/microL and > 75,000/microL, respectively. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated at 3 dose levels. The MTD was defined as 10 g/m(2)/96 hours of ifosfamide and 800 mg/m(2)/96 hours of etoposide. Thirteen additional patients then were treated at 1 level below the MTD to try and decrease the interval between courses. A total of 12 of 29 patients developed a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) after the first course of therapy. The most common DLT was gastrointestinal toxicity followed by hematologic toxicity. Twenty-seven patients developed standard National Cancer Institute criteria Grade 3 or 4 toxicity after the first course of treatment and 7 patients achieved a complete or partial response to the first course. The use of GM-CSF did not allow further dose intensification. CONCLUSIONS: This chemotherapy combination achieved a 31% overall response rate. A further increase in the dose intensity of this regimen may require supportive measures other than GM-CSF to decrease toxicity.     

Phase I study of infusional paclitaxel in combination with the P-glycoprotein antagonist PSC 833.

PURPOSE: PSC 833 (valspodar) is a second-generation P-glycoprotein (Pgp) antagonist developed to reverse multidrug resistance. We conducted a phase I study of a 7-day oral administration of PSC 833 in combination with paclitaxel, administered as a 96-hour continuous infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with advanced cancer were enrolled onto the trial. PSC 833 was administered orally for 7 days, beginning 72 hours before the start of the paclitaxel infusion. Paclitaxel dose reductions were planned because of the pharmacokinetic interactions known to occur with PSC 833. RESULTS: In combination with PSC 833, maximum-tolerated doses were defined as paclitaxel 13.1 mg/m(2)/d continuous intravenous infusion (CIVI) for 4 days without filgrastim, and paclitaxel 17.5 mg/m(2)/d CIVI for 4 days with filgrastim support. Dose-limiting toxicity for the combination was neutropenia. Statistical analysis of cohorts revealed similar mean steady-state concentrations (C(pss)) and areas under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUCs) when patients received paclitaxel doses of 13.1 or 17.5 mg/m(2)/d for 4 days with PSC 833, as when they received a paclitaxel dose of 35 mg/m(2)/d for 4 days without PSC 833. However, the effect of PSC 833 on paclitaxel pharmacokinetics varied greatly among individual patients, although a surrogate assay using CD56+ cells suggested inhibition of Pgp was complete or nearly complete at low concentrations of PSC 833. Responses occurred in three of four patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, and clinical benefit occurred in five of 10 patients with ovarian carcinoma. CONCLUSION: PSC 833 in combination with paclitaxel can be administered safely to patients provided the paclitaxel dose is reduced to compensate for the pharmacokinetic interaction. Surrogate studies with CD56+ cells indicate that the maximum-tolerated dose for PSC 833 gives serum levels much higher than those required to block Pgp. The variability in paclitaxel pharmacokinetics, despite complete inhibition of Pgp in the surrogate assay, suggests that other mechanisms, most likely related to P450, contribute to the pharmacokinetic interaction. Future development of combinations such as this should include strategies to predict pharmacokinetics of the chemotherapeutic agent. This in turn will facilitate dosing to achieve comparable CPss and AUCs.     

食管癌同期放化疗中奈达铂剂量递增临床Ⅰ期试验

[目的]探讨在食管癌同期放化疗中多西紫杉醇固定周剂量时奈达铂（NDP）的周最大耐受剂量（MTD）,并观察其不良反应。[方法]共入选20例初治食管鳞癌患者,采用三维适形放疗方法,DT：60～64Gy/30～32f,42～44d,同步化疗方案固定多西紫杉醇剂量20mg/w,共6w,NDP采用周剂量递增方法,起始剂量12mg/m2,递增剂量为6 mg/m2。剂量限制性毒性（DLT）定义为≥3级不良反应,出现DLT的前一剂量即为MTD。[结果]NDP 24mg/m2剂量水平时共有2例患者发生3～4级的DLT;NDP 18mg/m2、多西紫杉醇20mg即为MTD。主要不良反应为放射性食管炎、放射性肺炎、乏力和骨髓抑制。[结论]食管癌同步放化疗中固定多西紫杉醇20mg每周剂量时奈达铂每周最大耐受剂量为 18mg/m2。     

Phase I study of arsenic trioxide and temozolomide in combination with radiation therapy in patients with malignant gliomas

To evaluate the toxicity and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT) in malignant gliomas. A 3?+?3 dose escalation study was performed in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), and anaplastic oligoastrocytoma (AOA). All patients received RT 59?C61?Gy in 28?C33 fractions, TMZ for 42?days, and ATO 1?C2?h prior to RT for 5?days during the first week, then twice weekly until completing RT. Dose levels (DL) were: (1) TMZ 60?mg/m²/ATO 0.2?mg/kg; (2) TMZ 75?mg/m²/ATO 0.2?mg/kg; (3) TMZ 75?mg/m²/ATO 0.25?mg/kg. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity or grade 4 toxicity of any type from enrollment until 3?weeks after finishing RT. 17 patients (13 glioblastoma, 4 AA/AOA) were accrued. Median age was 52 (range 25?C80). Median KPS was 90?%. DLT??s occurred at DL 2 (grade 4 transaminase elevation) and DL 3 (grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 QTc prolongation). The MTD of TMZ 75?mg/m²/ATO 0.2?mg/kg was safe and well tolerated. A phase II study evaluating the efficacy of this combination is underway.     

食管癌同期放化疗PF方案剂量递增试验

目的确定同期放化疗食管癌时顺铂（PDD）和氟尿嘧啶（5-Fu）方案的中国人最大耐受量（MTD）并观察其毒副反应.方法15例初治食管癌患者成为研究对象.全程常规分割照射,总剂量60Gy分30次.同期化疗采用改良Fibonacci法,从低剂量逐渐上升到高剂量,起始剂量为PDD37.5 mg/m^2第1天,5-Fu 500 mg/m^2第1～5天,28 d为1个周期,共4个周期.递增剂量为PDD7.5mg/m^2,5-Fu 100mg/m^2,每剂量组至少3例,如无剂量限制毒性（DLT）出现则进入下一剂量组,直至出现DLT,DLT的次一剂量即为MTD.结果DLT为3级放射性食管炎,发生于PDD 60mg/m^2,5-Fu700mg/m^2剂量水平;则其次一剂量PDD 52.5mg/m^2,5-Fu 700mg/m^2即为MTD.主要毒副反应为放射性食管炎、白细胞减少、恶心呕吐和厌食.结论同期放化疗食管癌PF方案的中国人最大耐受量为PDD 52.5 mg/m^2第1天,5-Fu 700 mg/m^2第1～5天,28 d为1个周期,共4个周期.     

A phase I study of intravenous liposomal daunorubicin (DaunoXome) in paediatric patients with relapsed or resistant solid tumours

Anthracyclines are widely used in paediatric oncology, but their use is limited by the risk of cumulative cardiac toxicity. Encapsulating anthracyclines in liposomes may reduce cardiac toxicity and possibly increase drug availability to tumours. A phase I study in paediatric patients was designed to establish the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) after a single course of liposomal daunorubicin, 'DaunoXome', as a 1 h infusion on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Patients were stratified into two groups according to prior treatment: Group A (conventional) and group B (heavily pretreated patients). Dose limiting toxicity was expected to be haematological, and a two-step escalation was planned, with and without G-CSF support. Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in parallel. In all, 48 patients aged from 1 to 18 years were treated. Dose limiting toxicity was neutropenia for both groups. Maximum tolerated dose was defined as 155 mg m(-2) for Group A and 100 mg m(-2) for Group B. The second phase with G-CSF was interrupted because of evidence of cumulative cardiac toxicity. Cardiac toxicity was reported in a total of 15 patients in this study. DaunoXome shares the early cardiotoxicity of conventional anthracyclines in paediatric oncology. This study has successfully defined a haematological MTD for DaunoXome, but the significance of this is limited given the concerns of delayed cardiac toxicity. The importance of longer-term follow-up in patients enrolled into phase I studies has been underestimated previously, and may lead to an under-recognition of important adverse events.     

Phase I study of weekly paclitaxel and liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced solid tumours

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of a weekly administration of paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx; Schering Plough Pharmaceutical) in patients with advanced solid tumours. 19 pretreated patients with solid tumours received escalated doses of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (6-12 mg/m(2)) as a 1-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion followed by a fixed dose of paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) weekly for 4 consecutive weeks in cycles of 6 weeks. DLT was defined as grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grades 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicity or treatment delay due to unresolved toxicity during cycle 1. The MTD was reached at the dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin of 10 mg/m(2)/week and paclitaxel of 80 mg/m(2)/week. The DLTs were treatment delay due to grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhoea. A total of 55 chemotherapy cycles were administered, and grades 3-4 neutropenia occurred in seven cycles (13%); the non-haematological toxicity was mild with grades 2/3 diarrhoea occurring in 4 (7%), grades 2-4 asthenia in 11 (20%) and grade 2 mucositis in 7 (13%) cycles. There was no case with more than a 10% LVEF decrease after a median of 3 (range 2-6) administered cycles/patients. One patient with breast cancer and 1 with ovarian cancer experienced a major partial response. The weekly administration of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin at the dose of 10 mg/m(2) in combination with paclitaxel at the dose of 80 mg/m(2) for 4 consecutive weeks, in cycles of 6 weeks which represent the recommended doses for further phase II studies, is a well tolerated regimen, which merits further evaluation in tumours known to be sensitive to taxanes and/or anthracyclines.     

Parallel phase I studies of daunorubicin given with cytarabine and etoposide with or without the multidrug resistance modulator PSC-833 in previously untreated patients 60 years of age or older with acute myeloid leukemia: results of cancer and leukemia group B study 9420.

PURPOSE: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B conducted parallel phase I trials of cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide (ADE) with or without PSC-833 (P), a modulator of p-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred ten newly diagnosed patients > or = 60 years of age with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were treated. All patients received cytarabine by continuous infusion for 7 days at 100 mg/m(2)/d. The starting dose of daunorubicin was 30 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days. Etoposide was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days, except in the last cohort administered ADEP, who received 60 mg/m(2). PSC-833 was given intravenously with a loading dose of 1.5 mg/kg over 2 hours and a simultaneous continuous infusion of 10 mg/kg/d continued until 24 hours after the last dose of daunorubicin or etoposide. RESULTS: There was no toxicity attributed to the PSC-833. Dose-limiting toxicity was primarily gastrointestinal (diarrhea, mucositis in the ADEP group). The estimated maximum-tolerated doses, calculated using a logistic regression model, were daunorubicin 40 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days with etoposide 60 mg/m(2) for 3 days in the ADEP group and daunorubicin 60 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days and etoposide 100 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days in the ADE group. Twenty-one (48%) of 44 patients achieved complete remission with ADE, compared with 29 (44%) of 66 patients treated with ADEP. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to decrease the doses of daunorubicin and etoposide when they are administered with PSC-833, presumably because of the effect of the modulator on the pharmacokinetics of these agents. A phase III trial comparing the regimens derived from this phase I trial has recently begun.     

Weekly 24 h infusion of aviscumine (rViscumin): a phase I study in patients with solid tumours

Aviscumine is a ribosome-inactivating protein with potent antitumour activity in vitro and in vivo and is an Escherichia coli-derived recombinant counterpart of natural mistletoe lectin-I. The current study was performed to determine the safety profile, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a prolonged infusion of aviscumine in cancer patients. Aviscumine was given once weekly as a 24 h central intravenous infusion in patients with advanced, refractory progressive solid malignant tumours. Fourteen fully eligible patients (11 male, 3 female) with a median age 58 yrs (range 41-77) were enrolled. They had histologically verified disease, were 18 yrs old, had an ECOG PS 2 and adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. DLT was defined as any non-haematological grade 3-4 toxicity (Common Toxicity Criteria [CTC] version 2.0), neutrophil count <500/ microl for 7 days, febrile neutropenia or thrombocytopenia grade 4. The MTD was defined as the dose level below the dose at which 2 patients per dose level experienced a DLT during the first treatment cycle. Colorectal cancer, soft tissue sarcoma and pancreatic cancer were the most common tumour types. Dose levels of aviscumine ranged from 4 to 6 microg/kg. The median number of cycles was 2.8 (range, 2-8). Common side effects in cycle 1 were fatigue, fever, nocturia, urticaria, erythema and pruritus. DLTs occurred in 2/3 patients on the 6 microg/kg dose level and consisted of increases in ASAT grade 3, ALAT grade 3, gammaGT grade 3/4, hypokalemia grade 3 and fatigue grade 3. No DLTs were observed on dose levels 4 and 5 microg/kg. The best response (RECIST) was stable disease in 4 pts, lasting for 4-8 cycles. Pharmacokinetics indicated that potentially active plasma levels of the compound were maintained during the entire infusion. We conclude that the recommended dose for weekly 24 h infusions of Aviscumine should be 5 microg/kg.     

First-in-man dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of CAP7.1, a novel prodrug of etoposide,in adults with refractory solid tumours

AimAn open-label, phase I dose-escalation trial was performed in adult patients with various solid cancers to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), to assess the safety, pharmacokinetic profile and anti-tumour activity of the new prodrug CAP7.1. The prodrug is converted to its active moiety etoposide via carboxylesterases in selective cells leading to a better tolerability and higher efficacy in therapeutic resistance cells and children with refractory neuroblastoma.Patients and methodsEligible adult patients with advanced, refractory, solid malignancies received CAP7.1 as intravenous infusion on 5 consecutive days. Doses were escalated in four cohorts consisting of three to six patients, with a starting dose of 45 mg/m²/day. Treatment cycles were repeated in 21-day intervals in the absence of disease progression and prohibitive toxicity. The safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy were evaluated, and the MTD and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) were determined.ResultsNineteen patients were assigned to four CAP7.1 dose cohorts (45, 90, 150 and 200 mg/m²/day). CAP7.1 was well tolerated. Haematotoxicity was observed at the two highest dose levels including three DLTs (two febrile neutropenia and one sepsis) only and were reversible with adequate therapy. No organ toxicity was observed. Non-haematological toxicities (mild-moderate) consist mainly of nausea, fatigue, vomiting, pyrexia and alopecia. One partial response and 11 stable diseases were observed as supporting signs of efficacy.ConclusionMTD of CAP7.1 was reached at the dose of 200 mg/m². A favourable safety profile and initial anti-tumour efficacy of CAP7.1 in therapeutic refractory tumours warrant further evaluation in clinical studies.     

Valproic acid (VPA) in patients with refractory advanced cancer: a dose escalating phase I clinical trial

Altered histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity has been identified in several types of cancer. This study was designed to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of valproic acid (VPA) as an HDAC inhibitor in cancer patients. Twenty-six pre-treated patients with progressing solid tumours were enrolled in dose-escalating three-patient cohorts, starting at a dose of VPA 30 mg kg(-1) day(-1). VPA was administered as an 1-h infusion daily for 5 consecutive days in a 21-day cycle. Neurocognitive impairment dominated the toxicity profile, with grade 3 or 4 neurological side effects occurring in 8 out of 26 patients. No grade 3 or 4 haematological toxicity was observed. The MTD of infusional VPA was 60 mg kg(-1) day(-1). Biomonitoring of peripheral blood lymphocytes demonstrated the induction of histone hyperacetylation in the majority of patients and downmodulation of HDAC2. Pharmacokinetic studies showed increased mean and maximum serum VPA concentrations >120 and >250 mg l(-1), respectively, in the 90 and 120 mg kg(-1) cohorts, correlating well with the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Neurotoxicity was the main DLT of infusional VPA, doses up to 60 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 5 consecutive days are well tolerated and show detectable biological activity. Further investigations are warranted to evaluate the effectivity of VPA alone and in combination with other cytotoxic drugs.     

A Phase I Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Aflibercept (VEGF Trap) in Children with Refractory Solid Tumors: A Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium Report

PURPOSE: Aflibercept is a novel decoy receptor that efficiently neutralizes circulating VEGF. A pediatric phase I trial was conducted to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of aflibercept. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Cohorts of three to six children with refractory solid tumors received aflibercept intravenously over 60 minutes every 14 days, at 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 mg/kg/dose. PK sampling and analysis of peripheral blood biomarkers were conducted with the initial dose. RESULTS: Twenty-one eligible patients were enrolled; 18 were fully evaluable for toxicity. One of six patients receiving 2.0 mg/kg/dose developed dose-limiting intratumoral hemorrhage and two of six receiving 3.0 mg/kg/dose developed either dose-limiting tumor pain or tissue necrosis. None of the six patients receiving 2.5 mg/kg/dose developed DLTs, defining this as the MTD. The most common non-DLTs were hypertension and fatigue. Three patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatoblastoma and clear cell sarcoma had stable disease for >13 weeks. At the MTD, the ratio of free-to-bound aflibercept serum concentration was 2.10 on day 8 but only 0.44 by day 15. A rapid decrease in VEGF (P < 0.05) and increase in placental growth factor (PlGF; P < 0.05) from baseline was observed in response to aflibercept by day 2. CONCLUSIONS: The aflibercept MTD in children of 2.5 mg/kg/dose every 14 days is lower than the adult recommended dose of 4.0 mg/kg. This dose achieves, but does not sustain, free aflibercept concentrations in excess of bound. Tumor pain and hemorrhage may be evidence of antitumor activity but were dose-limiting. Clin Cancer Res; 18(18); 5081-9. ?2012 AACR.     

Phase I and pharmacologic study of sequential topotecan-carboplatin-etoposide in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer

The inhibition of topoisomerase I by topotecan results in a compensatory increase in topoisomerase II associated with increased in vitro sensitivity of tumors to etoposide. Maximal synergy has been observed for the sequence of topotecan followed by etoposide. Carboplatin has clinical activity when combined with either of these two agents. These interactions were the pharmacologic rationale for topotecan p.o. days 1-5, carboplatin i.v. day 6, and etoposide p.o. days 6-10. Three successive dose levels were explored: (1) topotecan 2mg/day, carboplatin AUC 5, etoposide 150 mg/day; (2) topotecan 3mg/day, carboplatin AUC 5, etoposide 150 mg/day; and (3) topotecan 3mg/day, carboplatin AUC 5, etoposide 200mg/day. Filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day was injected s.c. days 11-18. Up to 6 cycles were administered every 21 days. Eligible patients had measurable or evaluable, extensive disease, small lung cell lung cancer, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG performance status 0-2, and adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. Follow-up was weekly for CBC. Tumor response was assessed after 2 and 6 cycles. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any of the following in cycle 1: grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity other than nausea and vomiting, grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 3 days, neutropenic fever or sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, or failure to recover neutrophils >or=1500/microl or platelets >or=100,000/microl by day 28. Ten patients were enrolled: median age 62 (range, 50-79); female/male 4/6; and performance status 0/1/2 in 2/7/1. Three patients each were treated on dose levels 1 and 2 without DLT. The first 2 patients entered on dose level 3 had no DLT. The third patient on dose level 3 developed grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 3 days, neutropenic fever, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia on day 15 of cycle 1. The fourth patient on dose level 3 developed grade 4 thrombocytopenia on day 18 of cycle 1. One patient received only 1 cycle and was not evaluable for response. Seven patients completed 6 cycles: 1 had a complete response and 6 achieved a partial response. The third patient on dose level 3 received 2 cycles and had stable disease, but had to be removed from protocol treatment because of grade 4 neutropenia despite dose reduction in cycle 2. The fourth patient on dose level 3 achieved a partial response, but had to be removed from protocol therapy after cycle 5 because of recurrent grade 4 thrombocytopenia. In conclusion, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is topotecan 3mg/day p.o. days 1-5, carboplatin AUC 5i.v. day 6, and etoposide 150 mg/day p.o. days 6-10 with filgrastim.     

Phase 1 study of an oxaliplatin and etoposide regimen in pediatric patients with recurrent solid tumors

BACKGROUND:

The combination of a platinating agent and etoposide has induced responses in various pediatric tumors. The study estimated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of an oxaliplatin and etoposide regimen in children with recurrent solid tumors.

METHODS:

Oxaliplatin was administered on Day 1 and etoposide on Days 1 to 3 of each 21‐day course. Cohorts of 3 to 6 patients were enrolled at 3 dose levels: 1) oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m² and etoposide at a dose of 75 mg/m², 2) oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m² and etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m², and 3) oxaliplatin at a dose of 145 mg/m² and etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m². Calcium and magnesium infusions were used at dose level 3 in an attempt to escalate the oxaliplatin dose past the single‐agent MTD.

RESULTS:

The 16 patients received a total of 63 courses. At dose level 1, dose‐limiting epistaxis, neuropathy, and neutropenia occurred in 1 of 6 patients. No dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred at dose level 2 (n = 6). At dose level 3, 2 of 4 patients experienced dose‐limiting neutropenia; none experienced grade 3 or 4 acute neuropathy. Six patients required prolongation of the oxaliplatin infusion because of acute sensory neuropathy. Responses were observed in patients with medulloblastoma (1 complete response) and pineoblastoma (1 partial response); 3 others with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor, ependymoma, and soft tissue sarcoma had prolonged disease stabilization.

CONCLUSIONS:

The MTD of this regimen was found to be oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m² given on Day 1 and etoposide at a dose of 100 mg/m²/d given on Days 1 to 3. Neutropenia was found to be the DLT. Calcium and magnesium infusions did not allow escalation of the oxaliplatin dose. The combination was well‐tolerated and demonstrated antitumor activity. Cancer 2009. © 2008 American Cancer Society.