Physiological changes in membrane-expressed platelet factor 4: Implications in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Background

Many heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies cause platelet activation in the serotonin release assay (SRA) in the absence of heparin. This in vitro observation may help unravel the mechanism of delayed-onset HIT, where seropositive patients develop thrombocytopenia and associated thrombosis after cessation of heparin.

Objective

Studies were conducted to examine the relationship between platelet environment, surface PF4 expression, and the extent of heparin-independent platelet activation in the SRA.

Methods

Ex vivo platelets were washed and labeled for SRA, then used either before or after 45 minutes of recovery at 37 °C. HIT antibody-mediated serotonin release in the absence of heparin was compared to the extent of surface staining of the platelets with fluorescent anti-human PF4 antibodies.

Results

Handling of platelets for in vitro studies resulted in transient expression of surface PF4, and it was during this interval that platelets were most sensitive to activation by HIT antibodies in the absence of heparin. Heparin-independent platelet activation was attenuated when SRA-positive specimens were retested after platelets were incubated 45 minutes at 37 °C. Surface PF4 expression was diminished on the rested platelets, compared to the same platelets labeled immediately after handling. Thus compared to rested platelets, mildly activated platelets had elevated surface PF4 expression and a higher level of HIT antibody-mediated, heparin-independent platelet activation.

Conclusion

Surface expression of PF4 reflects HIT antigen presentation, and varies with the physiological state of platelets. Thus there can be differences in HIT antibody target availability among patients which may explain the variability in consequences of HIT antibody seropositivity.     

Validation of whole blood impedance aggregometry as a new diagnostic tool for HIT: results of a large Australian study

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains a challenge, with diagnosis confirmed only by functional assays. The gold standard 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA) is highly sensitive but technically challenging and unsuitable for routine use. We conducted a large study to validate whole blood impedance aggregometry (WBIA) as a suitable diagnostic tool for HIT. WBIA and SRA were used to test 181 samples positive for H-PF4 antibodies by PaGIA or ELISA. Using the same high responder donor, 77 samples were positive by WBIA (aggregation with low-dose but not high-dose heparin). Using the strict definition for SRA positivity, 72 samples were true HIT. In nine samples, serotonin release with high-dose heparin dropped by > 50% but was still >20%; these were retested after a one-half dilution and 8/9 became positive. Ten other samples were discrepant between the two assays: one strongly positive (89% release) and six weakly positive samples by SRA (average release 56%) were WBIA negative. When these samples were retested using a random donor, only two remained SRA positive. Three samples were strongly WBIA positive but SRA negative; two were retested by SRA with 0.5IU/ml heparin and one became positive. Under controlled conditions, using the same selected high-responder donor, WBIA and SRA performed similarly with slightly increased sensitivity of the WBIA when using the strict definition of SRA positivity. WBIA is easy to perform with rapid turn-around time and warrants a multi-laboratory trial to complete its validation as a confirmatory assay for platelet-activating HIT antibodies.     

Clinical evaluation of acute systemic reaction and detection of IgG antibodies against PF4/heparin complexes in hemodialysis patients

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a pathophysiological syndrome caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize PF4/heparin complexes. The abrupt onset of HIT following intravenous bolus heparin is known as an acute systemic reaction. Clinical features of this type of HIT may be similar to those of common complications during hemodialysis. The aim of the study was to identify whether the clinical features of the acute systemic reaction are caused by HIT or dialytic complications. Twenty-seven dialytic patients who had thrombocytopenia and clinical features of an acute systemic reaction were enrolled out of 202 HIT-suspected patients. Thirteen patients had HIT confirmed due to the presence of positive functional and immunoassays. Eight of the thirteen patients presented with acute systemic reactions due to HIT. The most common symptom of acute systemic reaction was dyspnea. The other nineteen patients, involving both HIT and non-HIT patients, had dialysis-complicated ASR. The major feature of the acute systemic reaction in hemodialysis was hypotension and its relevant symptoms. An immunoassay for the detection of IgG antibodies against PF4/heparin complexes (HIT-IgG) showed the wide-range linearity of the calibration curve by employing three concentrations of recombinant mouse monoclonal antibodies for PF4/heparin complexes. The results are expressed as micrograms of IgG in one milliliter. Significantly high levels in thirteen HIT patients were compared with levels in fourteen non-HIT patients. The highest median of 1,530 μg/ml (IQR: 3,267-813) was obtained in the presence of HIT associated with an acute systemic reaction. In HIT patients who did not show characteristics of an HIT-derived acute systemic reaction, the median was 339 μg/ml (1,178-834). Despite showing a positive ELISA, nine non-HIT patients without any platelet-activating antibodies showed a value of 97 μg/ml (166-56). The lowest median of 8.3 μg/ml (11-6) was in non-HIT patients with a negative ELISA. In conclusion, measurements of HIT-IgG -specific antibodies can facilitate an appropriate estimation in hemodialysis patients of whether the clinical features of an acute systemic reaction are caused by HIT or dialytic complications.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a stoichiometry-based model to explain the differing immunogenicities of unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and fondaparinux in different clinical settings

INTRODUCTION: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. The frequency of HIT is highly variable in different clinical settings, and is more frequent with unfractionated heparin (UFH) than with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), despite the in vitro observation that HIT antibodies activate platelets similarly well with LMWH as with UFH. An important difference between UFH, LMWH, and fondaparinux is their widely differing plasma concentrations. We aimed to provide a model that included anticoagulant concentrations and PF4 availability as risk factors influencing the anti-PF4/heparin immune response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By photon correlation spectroscopy we determined the concentrations at which UFH, LMWH, and fondaparinux form complexes optimally with PF4. Plasma concentrations of UFH and LMWH were calculated based on ex vivo pharmacokinetic data, with information on fondaparinux and PF4 concentrations taken from the literature. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The main features of our model are: optimal complex formation occurs at prophylactic-dose UFH and high PF4 levels, whereas therapeutic-dose LMWH concentrations are too high for optimal complex formation; in contrast, concentrations of fondaparinux are usually below the optimal stoichiometric range. Thus, immunization should occur more often in situations with major rather than minor platelet activation, and--for a given degree of platelet activation (PF4 availability)--as: prophylactic-dose UFH>therapeutic-dose UFH>prophylactic-dose LMWH, fondaparinux>therapeutic-dose LMWH. Our model provides a framework for explaining empirical observations that LMWH induces less anti-PF4/heparin antibodies than does UFH, and that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies are more often found in patients undergoing major surgery than in medical patients.     

Antiplatelet Factor 4—Heparin Antibodies in Patients with Antiphospholipid Antibodies

Antibodies directed against platelet factor 4-heparin are present in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Additionally, it has been suggested that heparin can be an antigenic target of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). We investigated the presence of heparin-platelet factor 4-induced antibodies (HPIA) in 33 patients with aPL. There were 30 patients with lupus anticoagulant, 25 with anticardiolipin antibodies, 21 with anti-β₂ glycoprotein I, and 18 with antiprothrombin antibodies. 20 patients had a history of thrombosis and 19 had received heparin during the last 60 months. We found 7 (21.2%) who had HPIA; 5 of them also had anti-β₂ glycoprotein I antibodies. Four patients had severe thrombocytopenia and suspicion of HIT. Among them, two presented high positive HPIA results, one of them with positive platelet aggregation test. The third patient showed grey zone HPIA and borderline aggregation test and the fourth one had negative results. Among patients without a history of HIT, 2 who had never received heparin presented high positive, one a moderate positive, and one a grey zone HPIA result; all of them with negative aggregation tests. Five positive sera samples were incubated with cardiolipin liposomes in the presence of β₂ glycoprotein I, and whereas an inhibition greater than 50% was achieved in anticardiolipin and anti-β₂ glycoprotein I activities, HPIA results did not change. We demonstrate that HPIA could be frequently found in patients with aPL. They are responsible for HIT in some cases but can also be found in patients who have not received heparin. Whether they predispose patients with aPL to HIT is not known; nevertheless, a close follow-up of heparin treatment in these patients seems to be mandatory.     

A clinical-laboratory approach contributing to a rapid and reliable diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Introduction

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains a very challenging diagnosis. The first objective of this study was to compare the performance of the ID-H/PF4 PaGIA^® with the Asserachrom^® HPIA ELISA. The main purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the combination of the H/PF4 PaGIA^® with the clinical “4T's” score as a screening strategy.

Materials and Methods

102 patients with clinical suspicion of HIT were classified into risk groups using the 4T's score. The presence of HIT antibodies was assessed by two immunoassays and confirmed by a functional flow cytometric assay.

Results

Comparison of the ID-H/PF4 PaGIA^® with the Asserachrom^® HPIA ELISA demonstrated a comparable technical performance, being an excellent screening test to rule out HIT (negative predictive value or NPV = 100%). According to the 4T's score, HIT was excluded in all low risk patients (NPV = 100%). ELISA optical density levels were significantly different between all risk groups (P-values < 0.01). In contrast, due to the low positive predictive value (22%) and weak positive likelihood ratio (2.6), a positive ID-H/PF4 PaGIA^® result did not considerably increase the probability of HIT.

Conclusion

Our study confirms the combination of the 4T's score with the ID-H/PF4 PaGIA^® as a reliable strategy to rule out HIT. Yet, confirming positive ID-H/PF4 PaGIA^® results by flow cytometry within 1-2 h after blood sampling remains necessary. This novel clinical-laboratory approach can contribute in a rapid and reliable way to the definite diagnosis of HIT.     

New insights in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia by the use of fluid-phase assays to detect specifically platelet factor 4/heparin complex antibodies and antibody-secreting cells

Introduction

The key feature of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the production of antibodies (Ab) against the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex. These Ab are directed against neoepitopes of the PF4 tetramer, which are induced by the complex formation with heparin. To study this humoral immune response in greater detail, either in a murine immunization model or in human blood samples, reliable and specific immune assays to detect specifically Ab against the PF4/heparin complexes, but not PF4 alone are required.

Materials and Methods

We established fluid-phase enzyme-immunoassays in which the soluble biotinylated antigen, PF4/heparin, is firstly captured by specific Ab, and secondly directly detected with enzyme-conjugated streptavidin.

Results

The use of this fluid-phase principle allowed a higher specificity than the traditional solid-phase enzyme-immunoassays in terms of Ab binding to murine PF4/heparin compared to murine PF4 alone. This fluid-phase approach applied to the detection of specific murine PF4/heparin Ab-secreting cells (ASC) identified the spleen as the main lymphatic organ that contributes to the PF4/heparin Ab response in mice. IgG ASC specific for PF4/heparin are very transiently detectable in mice, which might explain why anti-PF4/heparin IgG Ab typically disappear within 100 days in humans. Furthermore, this fluid-phase approach was successfully transferred to detect human PF4/heparin-specific Ab.

Conclusion

The fluid-phase principle for the specific detection of anti-PF4/heparin IgG and IgM Ab enables new and improved assays for HIT research in men and mice. At least in mice PF4/heparin antibodies are produced by transient B cells.     

Human anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies are capable of activating primate platelets: towards the development of a HIT model in primates

In the first step to establish an animal model of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) that is physiologically relevant to humans, studies were undertaken to determine the similarities or differences between human and non-human primate (Macaca mulatta) platelets in HIT assay systems. The collagen-, ADP-, and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation, and flow cytometric analysis of P-selectin expression and microparticle formation were similar for both species platelets (p>0.1, n=18 each). The classical HIT assays using platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as well as a flow cytometric assay revealed the activation/aggregation and serotonin release assay (SRA) profiles for both primate and human platelets were similar in response to human HIT positive sera. All assays were heparin concentration-dependent; heparin, at 0.1 U/mL, produced maximum and similar platelet activation/aggregation and SRA responses with both primate (76+/-7%, n=18) and human (68+/-11%, n=20; p>0.1) platelets. At concentrations > or =10 U/mL, heparin suppressed the platelet aggregation and SRA responses in both systems. Primate and human platelets displayed similar behavior to low molecular weight heparin and pentasaccahride in HIT assay systems. Immunoglobulins isolated from serum of patients with HIT caused activation/aggregation of human (65+/-18%, n=10 donors) and primate (79+/-12%, n=6 monkeys, p>0.08) platelets. Unlike human platelets, the primate platelets exhibited a more consistent aggregation/release response (15 out of 18 primate platelets reactive). In contrast, human donors showed wide variations in the activation/release response (4 out of 10 reactive). These observations suggest that primate platelets are activatable by anti-H-PF4 antibodies, and support the hypothesis that primates can be used to develop an animal model to study the pathogenesis of HIT.     

The prevalence of antibodies to the platelet factor 4 -heparin complex and association with access thrombosis in patients on chronic hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a serious complication that can lead to thrombocytopenia, venous and arterial thrombosis. Patients with this disorder develop antibodies to the platelet factor 4-heparin (PF4-H) complex. Hemodialysis patients are repeatedly exposed to heparin and are at risk for developing PF4-H antibodies. We sought to determine the prevalence of PF4-H antibodies in a large cohort of patients on chronic hemodialysis and to evaluate the relationship between PF4-H antibodies and hemodialysis vascular access thrombosis in a case-control study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pre-dialysis blood samples were drawn on 419 patients; 107 cases with access thrombosis and 312 controls that never had access thrombosis. All samples were screened for PF4-H antibodies using an ELISA assay (GTI PF4 Enhanced, GTI Diagnostics). All positive and indeterminate samples were then tested using an IgG-specific PF4-H ELISA assay and a platelet serotonin-release assay. RESULTS: Antibodies to PF4-H were positive in 54 (12.9%) patients using the screening ELISA assay. Nine (2.1%) patients had IgG-specific PF4-H antibodies. None of the patient's had a positive platelet serotonin-release assay. No relationship between hemodialysis access thrombosis and PF4-H antibodies was noted using the screening ELISA assay (unadjusted odds ratio 0.63; 95% CI 0.30-1.30; P = 0.21), the IgG-specific ELISA assay (unadjusted odds ratio 0.83; 95% CI 0.17-4.06; P = 0.82) or indeterminate platelet serotonin-release assay results (unadjusted odds ratio 0.97;95% CI 0.10-9.44;P = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis with repeated exposure to unfractionated heparin was associated with a moderately elevated prevalence of PF4-H antibodies. However, our results do not support a relationship between PF4-H antibodies and hemodialysis vascular access thrombosis.     

Development of a non-human primate sub-clinical model of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: platelet responses to human anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies

The purpose of this study was to characterize the responses of human and non-human primate (Macaca mulatta) platelets to anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 (AHPF4) antibodies. Due to the variations observed in the functionality and immunoglobulin isotypes in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), we used highly characterized human AHPF4 antibodies to study platelet activation responses. Using ELISA and 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA) systems, three patients' plasmapheresis fluid with similar responses to these assays were pooled. This pool was then used to study the platelet activation responses of human and primate platelets in the HIT platelet aggregation assay, a flow cytometry assay, and a variation of the aggregation assay in which glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were supplemented. In the plasmapheresis fluid from three patients, the most significant AHPF4 immunoglobulin isotype present (based on optical density readings) was IgG, with less IgM (p < 0.001) and IgA (p < 0.001). The SRA yielded equivalent platelet activation results in all three patients. Using this pool in the platelet aggregation assay, without any heparin present, there was less percent aggregation (p < 0.001) with human platelets (11.8 +/- 2.35, n = 5) compared to the primate platelets (54.3 +/- 10.2, n = 9). In presence of 0.4 U/ml heparin, both platelet types had similar percent aggregations (p > 0.05). Three glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors were used to evaluate the similarities in platelet activation. Eptifibatide was found to be a strong inhibitor of both species' platelet types at concentrations greater than 0.01 microg/ml. This was not the case with tirofiban which inhibited both human and monkey platelets at concentrations greater than 0.025 microg/ml. Abciximab inhibited aggregation at concentrations greater than 6.25 microg/ml. These data indicate that phylogenetic similarities in platelets of humans and primates may be used to further characterize the pathophysiology of HIT syndrome.     

Prevalence, isotype, and functionality of antiheparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies in patients treated with heparin and clinically suspected for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The pathogenic role of IgG

Antibodies to heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexes have been observed in patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) syndrome. These antibodies may be of various isotypes and differ with respect to their ability to activate platelets/endothelial cells. This study determined the isotypes and functionality of antiheparin-platelet factor 4 (AHPF4) antibodies in 111 patients treated with heparin and clinically suspected for HIT. In this patient population, 50% had detectable AHPF4 cumulative IgA, IgG, and IgM (determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, ELISA), but only 35% was positive when tested with the (14)C-serotonin release assay (SRA). Using antihuman Ig specific for different isotypes, we found that 50% of the 111 samples was positive for IgG, 45% for IgM, and 37% for IgA. In 50 normal human serum (NHS) samples, only two were positive for IgG, but 33 were positive for IgM, indicating a potential humoral response to the heparin-PF4 complex prior to heparin administration. Patients that were ELISA(+) for AHPF4 antibody titer were subdivided into SRA-positive (+) and SRA-negative (-) groups. The SRA(+) group had a mean ELISA optical density (OD) for AHPF4 IgA/IgG/IgM of 2.1, while the SRA(-) group had a mean OD of 0.8 (P<.001). The SRA(+) group had greater mean OD values for all three individual isotypes. Using flow cytometry, we determined the ability of different patient samples to activate platelets. Samples that contained IgG and were SRA(+) activated platelets (as measured by microparticle generation and P-selectin expression) in the presence of therapeutic concentrations of heparin. NHS and samples containing IgA and/or IgM that were SRA(-) were not able to produce microparticles nor were they able to increase expression of P-selectin. Together, these data indicate that IgG is the principal mediator of platelet activation in patients with HIT, with IgA and IgM playing a less significant role in the pathophysiology of this syndrome.     

Combined use of the high heparin step and optical density to optimize diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of an anti-PF4/heparin enzyme-immunoassay

Background

IgG-specific anti-PF4/heparin enzyme-immunoassays (EIAs) are sensitive but not specific for platelet-activating antibodies, the cause of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Two features of EIA reactivity predict for presence of HIT antibodies - the magnitude of a positive result (in optical density [OD] units) and the inhibition of reactivity at high heparin concentrations - but their combined utility remains uncertain.

Objective

To determine for an IgG-specific EIA how the OD values of a positive reaction and its inhibition by high heparin can be optimally combined.

Methods

We screened 1,000 consecutive patients with suspected HIT using an IgG-specific PF4/heparin in-house EIA with and without high heparin (100 IU/mL); and by the heparin-induced platelet activation test.

Results

Platelet-activating antibodies were rarely detected (< 0.2%) when the IgG-specific EIA was negative at the conventional cut-off (OD, 0.5). However, an OD cut-off of 1.0 resulted in an unacceptable loss of sensitivity (14/83 = 17%) for detecting platelet-activating antibodies. The high heparin step increased specificity for platelet-activating antibodies from 72% to 89% without loss of sensitivity when applied to weak-positive sera (OD ≤ 1.0). However, decreased sensitivity was observed with strong-positive sera (OD > 1.0): 11/69 such sera (16%) that did not show > 40% inhibition by high heparin nevertheless contained platelet-activating antibodies.

Conclusion

Specificity of an IgG-specific EIA for detecting platelet-activating antibodies can be optimized by applying the high heparin inhibition step to weak-positive reactions (0.5- ≤ 1.0 OD). However, applying the high heparin inhibition step to strong-positive reactions (> 1.0 OD) in our in-house assay risks falsely classifying a serum as negative for platelet-activating antibodies.     

Interleukin-10 promoter microsatellite polymorphisms influence the immune response to heparin and the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Introduction

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) results from an atypical immune response with synthesis of IgG antibodies (Abs) to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes (PF4/H), and probably involves both B and T cells. We investigated whether 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs1800896 (− 1082G/A), rs1800871 (− 819C/T) and rs1800872 (− 592C/A) and the polymorphic CA repeat microsatellites IL10R [5325CA(11_15)] and IL10G [8134CA(14_29)] are associated with the synthesis of Abs to PF4/heparin and HIT.

Materials and methods

Eighty-two patients with definite HIT and two control groups were studied. The first control group (Ab^neg) consisted of 85 patients without Abs to PF4/heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The second control group (Ab^pos) consisted of 84 patients who had developed significant levels of PF4-specific antibodies after CPB, but without HIT.

Results

Allele frequencies of the 3 SNPs were similar in HIT patients and controls. Fourteen alleles in IL10G (G16 to G29) and 3 alleles in IL10R (R13 to R15) were defined. The short G20 allele of IL10G was more frequent in Ab^neg patients (8.2%) than in Ab^pos (2.9%) and HIT patients (3%). It thereby appeared to protect against developing Abs to PF4/heparin (OR 0.29; 95% CI [0.12-0.70], p = 0.006). Combined haplotypes cH1/cH8 comprising the short G20 + R13 alleles were less frequent in HIT (OR 0.33; 95% CI [0.11-0.97], p = 0.036), and levels of Abs to PF4 in Ab^pos patients were lower in cH1/cH8 subjects (p = 0.019).

Conclusion

These results suggest that IL10 promoter microsatellite polymorphisms might influence the immune response against PF4/heparin and the risk of HIT.     

A new approach in the study of the molecular and cellular events implicated in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Formation of leukocyte-platelet aggregates.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a relatively common complication of heparin therapy, results of platelet activation, via the receptor for the Fc domain of IgG (FcgammaRIIa), by heparin-dependent-antibodies, commonly directed against the heparin-platelet factor 4 (H-PF4) antigenic complex. Our strategy was to use whole blood allowing the study of leukocyte-platelet interactions. Experiments were performed with blood from healthy donors incubated with HIT patients' plasma and different concentrations of heparin. We showed that 75% of the HIT patients' plasma induced the formation of leukocyte-platelet-aggregates in a heparin-dependent-manner. The formation of leukocyte-platelet-aggregates induced by HIT plasma in the presence of heparin was (i) independent of the healthy blood donor FcgammaRIIa polymorphism, (ii) correlated with the levels of anti H-PF4 IgG antibodies contained in the patients' plasma, and to a lesser extent to anti H-PF4 IgM antibodies, and (iii) was mediated by P-selectin. This report opens new prospects in the study of the molecular and cellular events implicated in HIT.     

Evaluation of a new nanoparticle-based lateral-flow immunoassay for the exclusion of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse complication of heparin caused by HIT antibodies (abs) that recognise platelet factor 4-heparin (PF4/hep) complexes. Several laboratory tests are available for the confirmation and/or refutation of HIT. A reliable and rapid single-sample test is still pending. It was the objective of this study to evaluate a new lateral-flow immunoassay based on nanoparticle technology. A cohort of 452 surgical and medical patients suspected of having HIT was evaluated. All samples were tested in two IgG-specific ELISAs, in a particle gel immunoassay (PaGIA) and in a newly developed lateral-flow immunoassay (LFI-HIT) as well as in a functional test (HIPA). Clinical pre-test probability was determined using 4T's score. Platelet-activating antibodies were present in 34/452 patients, all of whom had intermediate to high clinical probability. PF4/hep abs were detected in 79, 87, 86, and 63 sera using the four different immunoassays. The negative predictive values (NPV) were 100% for both ELISA tests and LFI-HIT but only 99.2% for PaGIA. There were less false positives (n=29) in the LFI-HIT compared to any other test. Additionally, significantly less time was required to perform LFI-HIT than to perform the other immunoassays. In conclusion, a newly developed lateral-flow assay, LFI-HIT, was capable of identifying all HIT patients in a cohort in a short period of time. Beside an NPV of 100%, the rate of false-positive signals is significantly lower with LFI-HIT than with other immunoassay(s). These performance characteristics suggest a high potency in reducing the risk and costs in patients suspected of having HIT.     

Platelets of patients with peripheral arterial disease are hypersensitive to heparin

We sought to verify earlier reports of increased platelet reactivity in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) during perioperative heparin administration, and to test the hypothesis of platelet hypersensitivity to heparin in these patients. Before and after incubation of platelet rich plasma with unfractionated (UH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and a low molecular weight heparinoid, real-time quantitative assessment of platelet function was performed by stagnation point flow adhesio-aggregometry (SPAA) in 21 patients with PAD and 14 healthy volunteers. With SPAA the occurrence of spontaneous aggregation is pathological. In the 15 patients requiring operation, platelet function and count were measured at regular intervals. To detect heparin dependent antibodies, the heparin induced platelet activation assay (HIPA) was performed preoperatively and after 10 days of heparin therapy. Mean baseline platelet adhesion in patients was double that observed in controls (p < 0.001). Spontaneous aggregation was seen in 9 (43%) patients and no controls (p < 0.001). In controls heparinoid reduced, whereas UH and LMWH slightly increased adhesion. Spontaneous aggregation was observed once with UH. Platelets from patients showed significantly enhanced adhesiveness and aggregability (p < 0.05) with UH and LMWH when compared to controls. Effects with the heparinoid were less pronounced and non-significant. In patients requiring operation, postoperative increases in platelet function and reductions in count were significant (p < 0.001). Ten (67%) experienced a fall in platelet count of > 50%. Preoperatively the HIPA assay showed no evidence of antibodies, whereas after heparin administration antibodies were verified in 4 (32%) patients and could not be ruled out in 6 (40%). Three developed postoperative thrombosis, in one case fatal. A hypersensitive in vitro and in vivo platelet response to heparin was verified in patients with PAD and a large number developed the immunological type of heparin-associated thrombocytopenia. Our findings suggest that a thrombin antagonist which does not interact with platelets may give the best perioperative protection in these patients.     

Performance characteristics of two commercially available IgG-specific immunoassays in the assessment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

Background

The in vitro demonstration of antibodies against platelet factor-4/heparin (PF4/hep) complexes is an important contribution to the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The use of PF4/hep IgG-specific immunoassays enhances the specificity of HIT-investigations without any impairment of the sensitivity. Several IgG-specific immunoassays with different origin and structure of the target antigen-complex are commercially available.

Methods

Using a retrospective cohort consisting of 459 patients suspected to have HIT, we compared the performance characteristics of two commercially available IgG-specific immunoassays, GTI- (Genetic Testing Institute) and HIA-IgG-ELISA (Hyphen Biomed Research).

Results

PF4/hep antibodies were detected in 85 and 81 sera using GTI- and HIA-IgG-ELISA, respectively. OD values and clinical likelihood of patients who tested positive in one assay only were significantly lower than in those who tested positive in both immunoassays. Both IgG-specific assays showed high negative predictive values (100%) and similar but unsatisfactory positive predictive values, determined by a minimum clinical score of 5 and a positive HIPA result (41% and 43%, respectively). The implementation of a confirmatory step using excessive heparin increased the PPV of both assays, but results in a reduction of NPV in HIA-IgG-ELISA.

Conclusions

The detection of IgG antibodies alone improves the clinical usefulness of immunoassays. However, functional assays remain indispensable to avoid the overdiagnosis of HIT caused by the detection of IgG non-platelet activating antibodies. The OD value in IgG immunoassays appears to correlate with the clinical relevance of the antibodies and might be used as a predictive parameter in the assessment of HIT.     

Low prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after cardiac surgery in Thai patients

Introduction

Heparin induced-thrombocytopenia (HIT) has been well recognized in Western countries. However, there are no data in the Thai population. We therefore investigated the prevalence of anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies, HIT, and its thrombotic complications in Thai patients undergoing cardiac surgery using unfractionated heparin.

Materials and methods

Seventy-three consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled in this study. Blood samples before operation and week 1, week 2, and week 3 after operation were collected from each patient for HIT antibody screening by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using IgG antibody specific to the PF4/heparin complex. Positive samples were further analyzed by ¹⁴C-serotonin release assay. Complete blood count was performed daily during the first week, then weekly for 3 weeks.

Results

No patient had detectable anti-PF4/heparin antibodies at baseline. Five patients sero-converted during the course of the study for anti-PF4/heparin IgG: 3 (4.1%) at week 1, 4 (5.5%) at week 2, and 5 (6.8%) at week 3 after surgery. However, none of these patients had anti-PF4/heparin antibodies that resulted in ¹⁴C-serotonin release to be considered clinically significant antibodies. Post-operative thrombocytopenia after the operation was found in 35 patients (47.9%), but was not considered to be caused by HIT. Thromboembolic events occurred in 3 patients (4.1%) during follow up; however, none of these patients had positive PF4/heparin antibody tests.

Conclusions

Our study represents the first study to examine Thai patients exposed to heparin in the context of cardiac surgery. We found a lower prevalence of positive anti-PF4/heparin antibodies and clinical HIT than previously published studies.     

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: diagnosis and management

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune reaction in response to platelet factor 4-heparin complexes, which results in increased platelet activation and thrombocytopenia beginning on the 4th-5th day after heparin exposure induced by IgG antibody production. Platelet activation can lead to arterial thrombosis, but more commonly platelet microparticle formation contributes to venous thrombosis. Accurate diagnosis of HIT is based on the presence of clinical features, including a 50% fall in platelet count, appropriate timing of thrombocytopenia, development of new thrombosis despite thrombocytopenia and heparin therapy, and the absence of a more likely cause of thrombocytopenia. Documentation of an anti-PF4-heparin antibody is necessary, but is not sufficient to make the diagnosis since antibody formation occurs in a variety of clinical settings without the development of thrombocytopenia or thrombosis. Once HIT is suspected or confirmed, all forms of heparin should be discontinued and an alternative form of anticoagulation should be administered until the platelet count recovers. Treatment options include intravenous administration of argatroban, lepirudin, and bivalirudin; subcutaneous administration of fondaparinux has also been described. Warfarin therapy, if indicated, should be avoided until platelet recovery. Re-exposure to heparin can be avoided by use of alternative anticoagulants for most circumstances. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) has been the focus of increasing attention over the past 15-20 years. As interventions for HIT are developed, there is a need to accurately diagnose the condition, which can be challenging especially in severely ill patients.     

Diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in neonates and children

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a well-known side effect of heparin therapy, occurs with an incidence of 1-2% in certain pediatric patient groups. In affected children, HIT markedly increases the risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. The use of alternative anticoagulation with danaparoid, lepirudin and argatroban in adults and children has demonstrated to be safe and could reduce morbidity and mortality also in affected pediatric patients. Thus, in children and neonates, an early diagnosis and accurate management is crucial to avoid the deleterious consequences of HIT. This review article will focus on the presentation of HIT in neonates and children. It reviews the pathophysiology of HIT and it summarizes epidemiological data. Finally important diagnostic and therapeutic issues are discussed.