Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In general, while this procedure is safe, patients require a spinal, epidural, or general anesthesia and often several days of hospital stay; the potential morbidity and mortality limits the use of TURP in high-risk patients. Pharmacotherapy has been recommended as a first-line therapy for all patients with mild to moderate symptoms. Patients are often times enthusiastic if they are offered a one-time method to treat lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH, provided that the method offers reduced risk and allows an efficacy equal to that of medical therapy. One such method is transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). TUMT involves the insertion of a specially designed urinary catheter with a microwave antenna, which heats the prostate and destroys hyperplastic prostate tissue. TUMT allows the avoidance of general or regional anesthesia, and results in minimal blood loss and fluid absorption. In this review, the authors discussed the current indications and outcome of TUMT, including the history of the procedure, the mechanism of action, the indications for TUMT, the pre-operative considerations, the patient selection, the results in terms of efficacy, by comparing TUMT vs. Sham, TUMT vs. Alpha-blocker and TUMT vs. TURP. Finally, the complications are presented, as well as other uses and future directions of the procedure. The authors concluded that TUMT is a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to treatment of symptomatic BPH.     

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy in benign prostatic hyperplasia

This article reviews the available literature and data on high-energy transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) causing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). TUMT is a safe, durable, (1-hour) procedure, without the need for anesthesia. Emphasis is made on the effect and mechanism of TUMT, the different devices available including different energy protocols, and accompanying clinical results.     

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Many urologists have a high regard for the usefulness of transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT) in treating patients with lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia. This therapy has been examined clinically in many centers throughout the world. The rationale for its effect on symptoms is unlike many of the other so-called minimally invasive treatment modalities. The improvement in symptoms and voiding function is greater with transurethral microwave thermotherapy than with drug therapy, and the associated morbidity is low. It also offers greater versatility than drug therapy, allowing patients with severe baseline symptoms and small prostates to be treated successfully. In addition, there has been an evolution in the technology of TUMT from low-energy to high-energy application indicating that this technique has a future in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms.     

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy in the armamentarium of therapeutic modalities for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) has gained a firm place in the spectrum of therapeutic modalities for management of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outflow obstruction. To achieve optimum results following TUMT, intense research focuses on appropriate patient selection, heat-tissue interactions, and modification of technical specifications. Results of TUMT are good to excellent for the majority of patients, but there is a non-negligible number of patients who respond poorly. The selection of favorable candidates for TUMT aims to improve the therapeutic results, and both clinical baseline parameters and intrinsic characteristics of the prostate (histologic composition and vasculature) may influence treatment outcome. TUMT achieves therapeutic response through coagulative necrosis of the hyperplastic tissue, but additional theories have been proposed recently, suggesting that TUMT may cause neural destruction and induce apoptosis. Individualization of the treatment is expected to offer the best results, and because the temperature achieved inside the prostate determines the actual parenchymal necrosis, thermal monitoring during treatment will permit application of microwave energy in a feedback mode. Various microwave devices differ in technical specifications (operating frequency, design of antenna, cooling system), and recently introduced software programs (high-energy protocols, heat-shock strategy, short-duration protocols) aim at better efficacy, providing a more patient-friendly procedure. TUMT has survived the "test of time" that other, initially promising, modalities have failed. What remains to be determined is the maximum benefit that patients and health systems can gain from such a technique.     

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: short-term experience with Prostcare

PURPOSE: To assess our short-term experience with transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 1993 through July 1994, in total 65 patients with symptomatic BPH were enrolled into this study. The patients' ages ranged from 56 to 95 years with a mean of 70 years. Under local anesthesia with intraurethral instillation of Xylocaine jelly only, all patients received one session of TUMT for up to 60 min with Prostcare equipment. Uroflowmetry was performed and international prostatic symptom score (IPSS) determined before 3 and 6 months after TUMT for assessment of efficacy. All adverse events were recorded and evaluated for clinical relevance. RESULTS: At 3 and 6 months following TUMT, the mean IPSS decreased from 19.7 +/- 6.8 (baseline) to 12.8 +/- 8.2 (-46%) and to 15.5 +/- 9.0 (-21%), respectively; the maximal urine flow rate at 3 and 6 months increased from 9.1 +/- 4.8 ml/s (baseline) to 11.0 +/- 4.9 ml/s (+21%) and to 10.9 +/- 5.6 ml/s (+19%), respectively. During TUMT, burning sensation was the most frequent complaint (38.5%), followed by urethral discomfort (29.2%) and urgency (9.2%). Two patients (3.1%) interrupted TUMT, because of intolerable pain. Following TUMT micturition pain (73.8%) and gross hematuria (45.9%) were the most adverse events. Most of these adverse events disappeared within 2 weeks. One patient suffered from skin erosion over the penoscrotal junction 1 week later. None had retrograde ejaculation; 1 patient complained of erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Although the efficacy of TUMT with Prostcare became less prominent 6 months after TUMT, TUMT was still a tolerable, safe alternative treatment of BPH, especially in patients who were not suitable for transurethral resection of the prostate or anesthesia.     

Transurethral hot water balloon thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

For many years the transurethral prostatectomy has been the standard therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In the past 10 to 15 years, a number of competing minimally invasive technologies (MIT) have been used to treat patients with symptomatic BPH. These heat-based treatments include transurethral microwave thermotherapy, interstitial devices (eg, interstitial laser coagulation and transurethral needle ablation), high-intensity focused ultrasound, and water-induced thermotherapy (WIT). This article reviews the evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of transurethral hot water balloon thermotherapy for BPH. Appropriate patient selection factors for WIT versus other MITs are reviewed. A novel combination therapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate also is proposed.     

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy of benign prostatic hypertrophy]

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy using Prostatron was performed in 31 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy, and the clinical effectiveness was evaluated by analyzing the subjective and objective responses following the treatment. The 22F balloon catheter to be placed in the prostatic urethra incorporates the microwave antenna, a cooling system and a fiberoptic thermosensor which allow an effective delivery of microwave energy to the center of the prostate, while preserving the mucosa and periurethral tissue. The maximum urethral temperature during the treatment ranged from 43.3 to 45.5 degrees C (44.7 +/- 0.96 degrees C: mean +/- S.D.) and the average power output was 27.4 Watt. The treatment was performed in a single session of an hour on the outpatient basis. In one patient who could not be relieved of the indwelling catheter underwent a transurethral resection, and the histological effect of thermotherapy on the resected specimen was examined. In the prostatic tissue, heat-induced necrotic change of the interstitial tissue as well as degenerative change of the acinar epithelium were remarkable, whereas the urethral mucosa was well preserved. In the remaining 30 patients, the clinical effects were evaluated 8 weeks after the treatment by a score scale for subjective symptoms, residual urine and maximum urinary flow rate, which was compared with the pretreatment score. Improvement of both subjective symptoms and objective findings was observed in 13 subjects (43.3%), that of subjective symptoms only in 14 cases, and that of objective findings only in 2 cases, resulting in a notable improvement in total 29 cases (97.7%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: long-term durability with Prostcare.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term durability of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) with Prostcare for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 1993 to July 1994, a total of 65 patients with symptomatic BPH who underwent TUMT using the Prostcare apparatus (Bruker Spectospin, Wissembourg, France) with low-energy protocol (maximal power 52 W) were enrolled into a short-term evaluation. Subsequent follow-up information was collected in July 1999. If patients had had any further therapy for BPH, the date of retreatment was considered as an endpoint of TUMT efficacy. If no further therapy for BPH had been needed, they were re-assessed for overall satisfaction. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 49 months. Twenty patients were excluded for various reasons, including 17 with loss of follow-up and 3 with new diseases that could affect the voiding status. Thirty-eight (84.4%) of 45 valuable patients had received further therapy for BPH, including medication (n = 21, 46.7%), and endoscopic surgery (n = 17, 37.7%). The times to pharmacologic or endoscopic retreatment after TUMT were 8.9+/-11.1 and 23.0+/-14.4 months, respectively (p = 0.0003, log rank test). Only 7 (15.5%) patients had no further treatment, with 3 having satisfactory improvements, but 4 feel dissatisfied yet not needing any further therapy. In addition, 2 patients complained of erectile dysfunction after TUMT and 1 was diagnosed with prostate cancer 50 months after TUMT. In addition, there was no significant difference for all baseline values among three groups with no retreatment or retreatment with medication or endoscopic surgery. CONCLUSION: At the 5-year follow-up, the long-term durability of low-energy TUMT with Prostcare is only exhibited in a few patients and the overall retreatment rate was 84.4%. Thus, patient should be informed of the high probability of supplementary treatment after TUMT.     

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia--experience with the Prostcare

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with the Prostcare¹ has been used in our department since April 1992. Our research has mainly been focused on strategies for development of the apparatus, accessories, and treatment performance to find an optimal means of treatment. The development to high-power thermotherapy has demonstrated a significant improvement in symptom and quality-of-life scores, maximal flow rate, and residual and voided urinary volume after 6 months. Pressure-flow data have additionally demonstrated a significant decrease in the minimal urethral opening pressure. The improvement in outcome after high-power thermotherapy is associated with an increased short-term morbidity as compared with low-power treatment. The outcome is dependent on several factors: power and intraprostatic temperatures, treatment performance technique, configuration of heat distribution of the antennae, and the localization of maximal heat in the prostatic urethra.     

Transurethral thermotherapy in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Transurethral radiofrequency thermotherapy for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia was performed in 50 selected patients, using the THERMEX II, device. High surgical risk patients were included, among them 13 previously catheterized ones, becaused of unresolved retention for more than 6 months. The treatment consisted of a three-hour single session at 47°C. Follow-up studies were carried out at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months using Madsen score, maximum flow rate, residual urine volume determinations and prostate bulk measurement by transcrectal ultrasound. Subjective and objective improvement (of more than two parameters) was noticed in 62% of the patients. Prostatic volume did not change. In the retention group 54% of the patients remained free of catheter. Postoperative histology in 8 cases that failed to respond, revealed focal haemorrhagic and necrotic changes in periurethral glandular tissue. This is a promising method for selected high risk patients that achieves reasonable but not comparable results to TURP and requires further investigation in larger patient groups with BPH.     

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Relation between clinical response and prostate histology

The effectiveness of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for BPH has been confirmed. To identify the characteristics of the ideal candidate, retrospective analysis and morphometric study of prostatic tissue were performed. Forty-two patients with symptomatic BPH were included in the study; these comprised 10 patients treated for more than 3 months with anti-androgen pre-TUMT (group A) and 32 fresh cases (group B). Subjective and objective responses were evaluated at 2 months post TUMT. In 12 fresh cases who underwent pre-TUMT biopsy of the prostate, the stromal-to-epithelial ratio was determined via quantitative image analysis on a computer-assisted morphometry system. No significant differences in baseline patient characteristics were found between the two groups: age, prostate volume, peak flow rate (PFR), or International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS). However, significant differences in treatment outcome were found between the two groups (group A vs. group B, respectively): total energy delivered to the prostate: 96 kJ vs. 125 kJ; I-PSS decrease from baseline: 5.9 vs. 11.6; PFR increase from baseline: 1.1 vs. 4.7 ml/sec. There was a positive correlation between the I-PSS change from baseline and the stromal-to-epithelial ratio of the prostatic tissue (r = 0.4857). The results suggest that microwave interacts poorly with the prostate due to the artificially created “lack” of glandular tissue. The morphometric study also supports the contention that the histological composition of the prostatic tissue plays an important role in terms of microwave thermal interactions and treatment outcome. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy vs transurethral resection for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in treating men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We searched Medline, the Cochrane Library and reference lists of retrieved studies to identify randomized trials of >/= 6 months duration with >/= 10 patients in each treatment arm. Data were extracted on study design, patient and treatment characteristics, urinary symptoms, urinary flow, adverse events and repeat treatment for BPH. RESULTS: Six studies were evaluated, involving 540 patients. The mean age (67.8 years), baseline symptom score (19.5), and peak urinary flow (PUF, 8.6 mL/s) did not differ by treatment group. The pooled mean urinary symptom score decreased by 65% with TUMT and 77% with TURP. The weighted mean (95% confidence interval) difference for the symptom score at the follow-up was -1.83 (-3.09 to -0.58) points, favouring TURP. The pooled mean PUF increased by 70% with TUMT and 119% with TURP. The weighted mean difference for the PUF at the follow-up was 5.37 (4.22-6.51) mL/s, favouring TURP. Retrograde ejaculation (57.6% vs 22.2%), transfusions (5.7% vs 0%) and re-treatment for strictures (relative hazard 9.76) were all significantly more common after TURP, but re-treatment for BPH was significantly more common after TUMT (relative hazard 10.0). CONCLUSIONS: TUMT techniques are effective and safe short-term alternatives to TURP for treating BPH. However, TURP provided greater symptom and urinary flow improvements and fewer subsequent BPH treatments than TUMT.     

Clinical results of microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy is a truly office procedure without the need for anesthesia for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia. Several devices have been developed. Continuous refinement of the procedure led to higher energy protocols and high-intensity dose protocols applying the heat-shock strategy. We report on the clinical results of these protocols. Symptom scores improve around 60%, whereas maximum urinary flow rate improve from an average 9 to 10 mL/sec at baseline to 14 to 15 mL/sec during follow-up. No significant differences have been shown between the outcomes with the different devices. Long-term data show satisfactory results after 4 years. Initial clinical results with the heat-shock strategy show results comparable to those of higher-energy protocols with decreased morbidity. Treatment morbidity of higher energy protocols is moderate and consists mainly of the need for catheterization and a higher percentage of retrograde ejaculation. To improve treatment efficacy, patient selection appears to be most important. Prostate size, bladder outlet obstruction, age, and prostate composition are of predictive value for treatment outcome. Further development of the treatment protocols and refinement of the urethral applicators might enhance outcome.     

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results obtained with the Prostalund device

The 6-month results of treatment with transurethral microwave thermotherapy (Prostalund) of 28 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign hyperplasia of the prostate are reported. The median International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) fell from 16.5 (range 9–33) to 10.5 (range 3–30; P < 0.00005). Quality-of-life assessment improved from a median value of 4 (range 2–6) to 2 (range 1–5; P = 0.0001). In the Danish Prostate Symptom Score (DAN-PSS) the median total score fell from 20 (range 5–55) to 5 (range 0–43; P = 0.001). The median peak urinary flow increased from 10.6 to 11.5 ml/s (P = 0.20). Pressure-flow studies revealed no decrease in the median detrusor pressure at peak uroflow (Pdet_Qmax) from 56 cmH₂O preoperatively to 56 cmH₂O after 6 months (P = 0.36). No change was found in postvoid residual urinary volume or in the calculated prostate volume. Complications included hematuria in most patients, urinary tract infections in 6 (21.4%) patients, and transient retention in 3 (10.7%) patients. In all, 20 (71.4%) patients responded to treatment with good symptomatic relief, but only minor changes were observed in urodynamic parameters.     

Long-term results of microwave thermotherapy for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE: To study the long-term outcomes of men with moderately severe symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who were treated with transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) with the Dornier Urowave machine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 220 patients (mean age 66.2 years) with clinical BPH, an American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Score of >or=13, and a peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) of 相似文献   

Aspects on transurethral microwave thermotherapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia

The underlying principle behind new minimal invasive procedures, such as microwave thermotherapy, is to coagulate the prostatic adenomatous tissue by means of heat. This article describes the action of heat on tissue and identifies areas of concern during treatment. The extent of the necrosis during treatment is governed by two physical variables: the intraprostatic temperature and the duration of the heat exposure. The prostatic blood flow is a key factor for the outcome of microwave treatment because it acts as a coolant and may effectively sink the temperature in the treatment area. Blood flow can vary substantially between patients and may change significantly during treatment. By measuring the intraprostatic temperature and varying the microwave power accordingly, it is possible to compensate for the large variations in prostatic blood flow and obtain consistent treatment.     

Water-induced thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Water-induced thermotherapy (WIT), administered by the Thermoflex System, represents a novel minimally invasive technique for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The Thermoflex System consists of an extracorporeal heat source and a proprietary closed-loop catheter system. Water, heated to 60 degrees C, is continuously circulated through the catheter to a treatment balloon, which conducts thermal energy to targeted prostatic tissue. The combination of heat and compression reduces the heat sink effect of the circulating blood, thus enhancing the thermal energy transfer to the compressed tissue. WIT treatment is performed using only topical urethral anesthetic, in a single 45-minute session. The 2-year follow-up data from a European multicenter study consisting of 125 patients showed an improvement in peak urine flow of 87.4% (from baseline 8.7 +/- 1.9 to 16.3 +/- 9.1 mL/s) and in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) of -54.2% (from baseline 24 +/- 5 to 11 +/- 5). Patient tolerance of WIT was rated as "excellent" or "good" in 91.8% of the procedures. WIT is efficacious, simple, and inexpensive, has few side effects, and does not need special probes to monitor prostate or rectum temperature; thus, it can be used in hospitals, outpatient clinics, and doctors' offices.     

Cell-kill modeling of microwave thermotherapy for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

PURPOSE: We investigated whether cell-kill modelling could be used as a mean for predicting the outcome of microwave thermotherapy for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: The two models--Henriques' damage integral and Jung's compartment model--were implemented in a computer program. Real treatment data for 22 patients with BPH who were in chronic retention were used as input, including measured intraprostatic temperatures and microwave power. To test if modelling gives results that are consistent with actual observations, comparison with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) measurements of the prostate volume before and after treatment was made. The sensitivity of the computer model for variations in the heat cytotoxicity and the temperature probe location in the adenoma was also tested. RESULTS: The average TRUS volume reduction 3 months after treatment was 26 cc, whereas the corresponding cell kill calculation was 27 cc. The computer model appears to be rather insensitive to minor uncertainties in heat sensitivity and location of the intraprostatic reference temperature sensors. CONCLUSION: Cell-kill modelling appears to give results that are consistent with actual observations. The coagulated tissue volume is calculated in real time during the treatment, thereby providing an immediate prediction of the treatment outcome. By using cell-kill modelling, the endpoint of a treatment can be set individually; e.g., when a certain volume reduction has been achieved.     

High-energy microwave thermotherapy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

INTRODUCTION: Transurethral microwave thermotherapy is an anesthesia-free, outpatient method of treating lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our results with the use of this technique in 25 patients are reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with BPH, 8 of whom with complete urinary retention, were treated with high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (HE-TUMT) (Prostatron system). Preoperative investigations included digital rectal examination, urinary free flow rate, PSA, urinalysis, urine culture, transrectal ultrasonography, urodynamic evaluation, International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL). Main selection criteria included: large prostate, high surgical risk, reluctance to undergo surgery. All patients were obstructed according to the Abrams-Griffith's nomogram. For the statistical analysis a repeated-measures, one-way ANOVA was performed on previously non-catheterized patients. RESULTS: Six of the 8 patients with catheter before treatment were able to urinate spontaneously with no significant post-voiding residual urine. In the 17 remaining patients, IPSS decreased from a mean of 18.5 at baseline to 7.30 and QoL from a mean of 3.9 to 1.2. Mean maximum flow rates during uroflowmetry increased from 8.5 to 16.9 ml/s. P(det) Q(max) decreased from a mean of 83.0 cm H(2)O at baseline to 50.7 cm H(2)O and Q(max) increased from a mean of 6.8 ml/s at baseline to 15.1 ml/s during the pressure-flow study. After TUMT, 13 patients were unobstructed and 4 equivocal according to the Abrams-Griffith's nomogram. CONCLUSION: Our study performed in a selected population of patients with BPH documents the efficiency and safety of HE-TUMT. This technique appears to be a valid therapeutic option, particularly in patients with high surgical risk.     

A single session of transurethral microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia]

A single session of transurethral microwave thermotherapy using Prostatron (Technomed International, France) was performed in 20 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, and the clinical efficacy of this modality was evaluated by analysing the subjective and objective responses following the treatment. 1,296 MHz microwaves are delivered to the prostate by an antenna placed in a 20 Fr urethral balloon catheter equipped with a cooling system for preservation of the urethral mucosa. The treatment was performed in a single session for an hour on an outpatient basis. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by a total score of subjective symptoms and objective findings including residual urine and average flow rate, 8 weeks after the treatment. Reduction of subjective symptom score was observed in 26 cases (86.7%), and that of objective findings in 21 (70%). When 25% or more decrease of the total score was defined as good, the overall good result including subjective and objective responses was seen in 24 cases (80%). During the treatment and follow-up period, no severe adverse effect was detected. In conclusion, a single session of thermotherapy by Prostatron is a safe and useful modality as a non-surgical treatment performed on an outpatient basis for benign prostatic hyperplasia.