Responses to ustekinumab in the anti‐TNF agent‐naïve vs. anti‐TNF agent‐exposed patients with psoriasis vulgaris

Background Approximately 20–30% of patients with psoriasis treated with anti‐tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) agents will discontinue treatment within 2 years due to loss of efficacy or side‐effects. Switching to another anti‐TNFα agent produces clinical responses inferior to previously untreated patients. Ustekinumab binds to the p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)‐12 and IL‐23 and provides a mechanism of action independent of TNFα. Objective To investigate the efficacy of ustekinumab in a clinical practice setting and to compare treatment responses to ustekinumab in patients previously treated with TNFα inhibitors and anti‐TNFα‐naïve patients. Methods Patients receiving either ustekinumab (n = 71) or the subcutaneous TNFα inhibitors adalimumab or etanercept (n = 108) were identified through the registry of psoriasis patients in our Institutions. Efficacy effect outcome was a 75% improvement in the psoriasis area severity index (PASI75). Kaplan–Meier statistics evaluated the adherence to the treatments expressed as drug survival rate. Results PASI75 was achieved in 80% of the ustekinumab‐treated patients after a median time of 112 days. There was no difference in efficacy in anti‐TNFα‐naïve patients compared with anti‐TNFα unresponsive patients. Patients treated with ustekinumab showed a superior adherence to treatment in comparison with adalimumab and etanercept. Limitations Patients were non‐randomly assigned to treatment, which potentially may lead to biases. Observation time was short (1 year). Conclusion In clinical practice, the short‐term efficacy and patient adherence to ustekinumab are excellent and comparable to the data obtained in clinical trials. Lack of response to previous anti‐TNF treatment does not impair clinical response to ustekinumab.     

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with psoriasis previously treated with anti‐tumour necrosis factor agents: subanalysis of BELIEVE

Background Few large clinical studies have evaluated whether switching tumour necrosis factor antagonists (anti‐TNFs) is likely to improve psoriasis in patients with prior anti‐TNF treatment. Objective The aim of this subanalysis of the BELIEVE study was to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab for psoriasis in patients with and without previous anti‐TNF treatment. Methods The BELIEVE study enrolled patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and prior failure, intolerance or contraindication to ≥2 systemic therapies. In this 16‐week, double‐blind, randomized, controlled trial, patients received adalimumab (80 mg, week 0; 40 mg every other week, weeks 1–15) with either topical vehicle or topical calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (C/B) applied once daily for 4 weeks, then as needed. The primary endpoint was ≥75% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) at week 16. This post hoc subanalysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of adalimumab, with and without topical therapy, in BELIEVE patients who had prior exposure to anti‐TNFs. Results Of 730 patients enrolled, 282 (38.6%) had prior anti‐TNFs and 448 (61.4%) were anti‐TNF‐naïve. Combining topical vehicle and topical C/B study populations, 61.7% of patients with prior anti‐TNFs achieved PASI 75 at week 16, compared with 71.7% of anti‐TNF‐naïve patients (P = 0.095). Adalimumab resulted in clinically meaningful improvement regardless of which prior anti‐TNF agent had been used, the number of prior anti‐TNFs tried, or reasons for discontinuation of prior anti‐TNF therapy. Adverse event incidences were similar between patients with and without prior anti‐TNF therapy. Conclusion Adalimumab was effective and well‐tolerated in patients with psoriasis previously treated with anti‐TNF therapy.     

Adalimumab in severe plaque psoriasis of childhood: A multi‐center,retrospective real‐life study up to 52 weeks observation

The objective of this study is to determine drug effectiveness and safety of the tumor necrosis factor‐alpha blocker monoclonal antibody adalimumab in a real‐life cohort of 54 children and/or adolescents with severe plaque psoriasis. Retrospective, multicenter analysis over a 52‐week period is discussed in this study. Efficacy was determined by the percentage of patients achieving Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI 75) and PASI 90 at weeks 16, 24, and 52 and the response in biologic‐naïve versus non‐naïve patients. Safety was assessed by the number of patients experiencing at least one adverse event. At week 16, 29.6% of patients achieved a 90% PASI score reduction (PASI 90), while 55.5% of patients achieved a 75% PASI score reduction (PASI 75). Effectiveness was sustained through week 24, since PASI 90 response increased to 55.5% and PASI 75 response increased to 74.0% of patients. The PASI response rates did not differ between biologic‐naïve and non‐naïve patients. The drug was well tolerated and no serious infections were observed. Adalimumab was effective and safe in this cohort of children with severe plaque psoriasis in a 52‐week observation. Effectiveness did not differ between biologic‐naïve and non‐naïve patients.     

Adalimumab therapy for psoriasis in real‐world practice: efficacy,safety and results in biologic‐naïve vs. non‐naïve patients

Background Patients and the course of treatment in daily practice are different from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Objectives Primary objective: to analyse the percentage of patients achieving PASI 75. Secondary objectives: PASI 50, PASI 90, PASI 100 responses, the percentage of patients experiencing at least one serious adverse event (SAE) and the response in biologic‐naïve vs. non‐naïve patients. Methods Prospectively collected efficacy and safety data of a cohort of psoriasis patients treated with adalimumab in daily practice between May 2007 and July 2011 were analyzed. Efficacy was determined using an intention‐to‐treat analysis and an as treated analysis, in comparison with the course baseline PASI before the start of adalimumab and the original baseline PASI before the start of any biologic therapy. Results Eighty‐five patients received adalimumab therapy with a mean treatment duration of 1.4 (range 0.02–3.1) years. Compared with the original baseline PASI, PASI 75 response rates at week 12 and 24 were 34% and 38% (ITT). PASI 75 responses were well maintained until week 132. Only the PASI 75 response rate at week 12 differed significantly between biologic‐naïve (56%) and non‐naïve patients (29%). Sixteen patients (19%) experienced 28 SAEs. Seven patients (8%) experienced SAEs considered possibly or probably related to adalimumab. Conclusions In this cohort, PASI75 responses were substantial but lower than in RCTs and other daily practice studies. Efficacy was well maintained during more than 2 years of follow‐up and differed only between biologic‐naïve and non‐naïve patients at week 12. The incidence of SAEs was low but seems higher than observed in RCTs.     

Effects of anti‐TNF‐α agents on circulating endothelial‐derived and platelet‐derived microparticles in psoriasis

Psoriasis involves TNF‐α secretion leading to release of microparticles into the bloodstream. We investigated the effect of TNF blockers on microparticles levels before and after treatment in patients (twenty treated by anti‐TNF‐α agents and 6 by methotrexate) with severe psoriasis. Plasmatic microparticles were labelled using fluorescent monoclonal antibodies and were analysed using cytometry. Three months later, 70% of patients treated with anti‐TNF‐α agents achieved a reduction in PASI score of at least 75%. The clinical improvement in patients treated with anti‐TNF‐α agents was associated with a significant reduction of the mean number of platelet microparticles (2837/μl vs 1849/μl, P = 0.02) and of endothelial microparticles (64/μl vs 22/μl, P = 0.001). Microparticles are significantly decreased in psoriatic patients successfully treated by anti‐TNF‐α. Microparticles levels as circulating endothelial cells represent signs of endothelial dysfunction and are elevated in psoriasis. Then, TNF blockade may be effective to reduce cardiovascular risk through the reduction of circulating microparticles.     

Asymmetric dimethylarginine but not osteoprotegerin correlates with disease severity in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis undergoing anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α therapy

Patients with psoriasis, in particular those with severe disease, have an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events compared with the general population. The aim of the present study is to determine whether correlation between asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and osteoprotegerin (OPG), two biomarkers associated with CV disease, and disease severity may exist in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. We also aimed to establish if baseline serum levels of these two biomarkers could correlate with the degree of change in the clinical parameters of disease severity following the use of anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α therapy in these patients. This was a prospective study on a series of consecutive non‐diabetic patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis who completed 6 months of therapy with anti‐TNF‐α‐adalimumab. Patients with kidney disease, hypertension or body mass index of 35 kg/m² or more were excluded. Metabolic and clinical evaluation was performed immediately prior to the onset of treatment and at month 6. Twenty‐nine patients were assessed. Unlike OPG, a significant positive correlation between ADMA and resistin serum levels was found at the onset of adalimumab and also after 6 months of biologic therapy. We also observed a positive correlation between the percent of body surface area affected (BSA) and ADMA levels obtained before the onset of adalimumab and a negative correlation between baseline ADMA levels and a 6‐month BSA change compared with baseline results. In patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis, ADMA levels correlate with clinical markers of disease severity.     

Relationship between the efficacy of biologics and clinical plaque psoriasis subtypes in Japanese patients: A single‐center pilot study

Although biologics for plaque psoriasis brought epoch‐making efficacy, not all patients achieve treatment success with all reagents. The aim of this study was to clarify the correlation between clinical plaque psoriasis subtypes, age at onset, and the efficacy of biologics. Clinical records for patients with plaque psoriasis at Fukuoka University Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. The efficacy of biologics was compared using the survival of the first biologics administered in treatment‐naïve patients. The survival of infliximab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab were followed until December 2016. The patients were clinically classified into three subtypes: small, large, or gigantic plaques using the size of the plaques on the back; early onset psoriasis (EOP, onset <40 years); or late‐onset psoriasis (LOP, ≥40 years). Eighty‐seven patients were enrolled. The survival of biologics was significantly better in large plaques compared with small or gigantic plaques (P = 0.0007). In patients treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, large plaques had significantly better survival than did the other types (P = 0.0122), while ustekinumab showed good survival in all three subtypes. The survival of biologics was numerically better in EOP than in LOP, but this was not significant. The efficacy of TNF inhibitors was different among clinical subtypes. Psoriatic patients with small plaques may be less responsive to TNF inhibitors. Further studies are needed.     

Anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐alpha therapy improves endothelial function and arterial stiffness in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: A 6‐month prospective study

The aim of the present study was to determine if the use of the anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α monoclonal antibody adalimumab could improve endothelial function and arterial stiffness in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. This was a prospective study on a series of consecutive patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who completed 6 months of therapy with adalimumab. Patients with history of cardiovascular events, diabetes mellitus, kidney disease, hypertension or body mass index of 35 kg/m² or more were excluded. Assessment of endothelial function by brachial artery reactivity measuring flow‐mediated endothelial dependent vasodilatation (FMD%), and carotid arterial stiffness by pulse wave velocity (PWV) was performed at the onset of treatment (time 0) and at month 6. Twenty‐nine patients were studied. Anti‐TNF‐α adalimumab therapy yielded a significant improvement of endothelial function. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) FMD% values increased from 6.19 ± 2.44% at the onset of adalimumab to 7.46 ± 2.43% after 6 months of treatment with this biologic agent (P = 0.008). Likewise, following the use of adalimumab, PWV levels decreased from 6.28 ± 1.04 m/s at the onset of adalimumab to 5.69 ± 1.31 m/s at 6 months (P = 0.03). In conclusion, patients with moderate to severe psoriasis exhibit improvement of endothelial function and arterial stiffness following anti‐TNF‐α therapy. These findings are of potential relevance due to increased risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with severe psoriasis.     

Ustekinumab in clinical practice: response depends on dose and previous treatment

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of ustekinumab in a series of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) label and to identify factors such as dose, baseline PASI or previous treatment potentially related to therapeutic outcome. Methods Retrospective review of the clinical records from 36 consecutive patients treated with ustekinumab during at least 36 weeks at a single referral center. Candidates for treatment had a PASI ≥ 10 or a BSA ≥ 10 and either failure to respond to, or a contraindication to, or intolerance to some systemic or another biologic treatment. The main outcome measures were PASI improvement with respect to baseline at weeks 12 and 24 (prior to the third injection of ustekinumab). Results Overall 75%, 69%, and 86% patients achieved PASI75 response rates at weeks 12, 24 and 36, respectively. Patients weighing ≤ 100 kg and treated with 45 mg doses had better PASI 50, PASI75 and PASI90 response rates than heavier patients (treated with 90 mg) at every point in time, and the differences were statistically significant at week 24. PASI75 response rates at week 24 were significantly better in patients with no prior exposure to TNFα blocking agents (85% vs. 50%, P = 0.0235). Conclusions In clinical practice, ustekinumab is effective both in biologic‐naÿve patients and as salvage therapy when other biological treatments have failed. The response rates prior to the third injection in our series were better in patients weighing ≤ 100 kg and in those without previous exposure to biologics.     

Safety of anti‐tumour necrosis factor‐α agents in psoriasis patients who were chronic hepatitis B carriers: a retrospective report of seven patients and brief review of the literature

Background Issues concerning the potential risks of reactivating chronic hepatitis B virus arise when the use of anti‐Tumour Necrosis Factor‐α (TNFα) agents is imperative in patients with concurrent psoriasis and hepatitis B virus infection. Objective The aim of this study was to report the experience regarding safety in the management of patients with coexisting psoriasis and chronic hepatitis B with the anti‐TNFα agents: infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab. Methods The psoriasis outpatient database of our dermatological department was searched for psoriasis and hepatitis B diagnoses and the medical records of these patients were reviewed for use of anti‐TNFα agents. Results Seven cases (four women and three men) were identified, with mean age of 51 years (34–65 years). Three patients received adalimumab, three patients were given etanercept and one infliximab. All patients received lamivudin, 100 mg/day, which started 2 weeks before the initiation of anti‐TNFα medication and went on during the whole treatment period. Follow‐up period extended from 6–24 months. All patients were inactive HbsAg (+) carriers. Liver function tests – at baseline and at the end of follow‐up period – were within the normal range. There was no considerable rise in the viral load in any case, from baseline until the last available measurement, although a patient receiving infliximab showed an increase that reached 600 IU/mL. Conclusion Successful treatment of psoriasis with anti‐TNFα agents in patients who are inactive HBsAg carriers is possible and could be safe under the conditions of concomitant lamivudin administration and intensive monitoring. Larger randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.     

Impact of anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α agents on serum levels of KL‐6 and surfactant protein‐D in patients with psoriasis

We longitudinally examined the influence of anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α treatment on serum levels of KL‐6 and surfactant protein‐D (SP‐D). The study group comprised 22 patients with psoriasis treated with infliximab or adalimumab and with no history of interstitial lung disease (ILD). KL‐6 and SP‐D levels were measured in serum samples. Twelve of the 22 patients (55%) showed at least a 20% increase in KL‐6 levels compared with baseline. Of these 12 patients, none exhibited any signs of ILD on chest computed tomography and nine who showed an increase in KL‐6 levels (75%) showed at least a 20% increase in SP‐D levels. Some patients showed simultaneous increases in KL‐6 and SP‐D levels after treatment with anti‐TNF‐α agents. Although these patients may have undetectable or subtle alveolar damage, careful observation is needed.     

Combination therapy of cyclosporine and anti‐tumor necrosis factor α in psoriasis: a case series of 10 patients

Combination therapy has become important in treating psoriasis, using synergism between different mechanisms to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity. Little has been published on the combination of cyclosporine and anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents. In this study, a retrospective chart review was made of the effects of this combination therapy in 10 patients with recalcitrant psoriasis. Treatment included a conditioning phase with cyclosporine, 3.14 ± 0.37 mg/kg for 4.6 ± 2 weeks, and a combination phase during which etanercept/adalimumab were initiated and cyclosporine was tapered over 10.2 ± 3.7 weeks. Treatment success, evaluated after each phase, was classified as complete recovery (CR, more than 75% improvement), partial response (PR, 25–75% improvement), and no response (NR, less than 25% improvement). All patients reached CR at the end of the combination therapy. Two were still on combination therapy after 12 and 20 weeks. Adverse event occurred in three cases, all in the conditioning phase. We conclude that combination therapy with cyclosporine and anti‐TNF α appears to offer an effective and safe approach to treatment of psoriasis.     

The single‐chain anti‐TNF‐α antibody DLX105 induces clinical and biomarker responses upon local administration in patients with chronic plaque‐type psoriasis

It is not clear whether TNF‐α antagonists used in the treatment of psoriasis need to act systemically, or whether local inhibition of skin‐produced TNF‐α would be sufficient to silence skin inflammation. To answer this question, we conducted two multicentre, double‐blinded, randomized, placebo‐controlled clinical trials with the novel single‐chain anti‐TNF‐α‐PENTRA^®‐antibody DLX105. Upon intra‐dermal injection, DLX105 induced a mean local PASI decrease of 33% over baseline after 2 weeks of treatment, while the placebo response was only 12% (P = 0.001). The clinical response was accompanied by changes in biomarkers such as reductions in K16, Ki67 and epidermal thickness as well as decreased mRNA levels of IL‐17, TNF‐α, IL‐23p19, IL‐12p40 and IFN‐γ. Next, we applied the drug topically twice daily in a 0.5% hydrogel formulation. While the local PASI did not change, topical DLX105 mediated significant reductions of mRNA levels of key proinflammatory cytokines when compared to placebo, and this effect was further enhanced after weekly tape stripping of plaques to increase drug penetration. These results suggest that longer treatment periods and/or increased local drug concentrations might result in better therapeutic efficacy of topically applied DLX105. In sum, we can show for the first time that local inhibition of TNF‐α is sufficient to mediate a biological response in psoriasis that translates into clinical efficacy.     

Clinical predictors of nonresponse to anti‐TNF‐α agents in psoriatic patients: A retrospective study

Although the heterogeneity of the therapeutic response to TNF‐α blockers seems to be mainly due to genetic factors, several studies showed that a range of factors may influence it. The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of patients' demographic and clinical characteristics on primary response to an anti‐TNF‐α therapy in psoriatic patients. We retrospectively examined the relationship between various clinical and demographic features and response to treatment with etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab, evaluated as PASI75 and average PASI improvement at weeks 12, 16, and 14, respectively. We analyzed data obtained from 199 patients. A better response to the treatment was significantly associated with male gender (OR = 2.59), coexistence of psoriatic arthritis (OR = 1.97), and PASI ≤15 at baseline (OR = 0.91). The present study supports that some clinical factors may be potential predictors of response to anti‐TNF‐α agents in psoriatic patients.     

Secukinumab efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis: Subanalysis from ERASURE,a randomized,placebo‐controlled,phase 3 study

Secukinumab, a fully human anti‐IL‐17A monoclonal antibody, neutralizes IL‐17A, a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Efficacy and safety of secukinumab was evaluated in Japanese patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis as part of a large Phase 3 global study (ERASURE). In this 52‐week, double‐blind study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01365455, JapicCTI‐111529), 87 patients from Japan (11.8% of 738 patients randomized in the overall study population) were equally randomized to receive secukinumab 300 mg or 150 mg, or placebo once weekly at baseline and at Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4, then every 4 weeks. Co‐primary endpoints (Week 12) were ≥75% improvement in psoriasis area‐and‐severity index (PASI 75) from baseline and a score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) on a 5‐point Investigator's Global Assessment scale (IGA mod 2011 0/1) versus placebo. PASI 75 and IGA mod 2011 0/1 responses at Week 12 were superior with secukinumab 300 mg (82.8% and 55.2%, respectively) or 150 mg (86.2% and 55.2%, respectively) versus placebo (6.9% and 3.4%, respectively; P < 0.0001 for all). Greater than 90% improvement in PASI (PASI 90) was also superior with secukinumab 300 mg (62.1%) or 150 mg (55.2%) versus placebo (0.0%) at Week 12 (P < 0.0001 for both). Clinical responses were sustained up to Week 52 in the majority of patients. During a 12‐week induction period, adverse event incidences were 48.3% with secukinumab 300 mg, 55.2% with 150 mg, and 41.4% with placebo. Secukinumab showed robust and sustainable efficacy in symptom reduction for moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis in the Japanese patients.     

Plasma trough levels of adalimumab and infliximab in terms of clinical efficacy during the treatment of psoriasis

We examined the relation between adalimumab and infliximab plasma trough levels, anti‐adalimumab and anti‐infliximab antibody formation. We analyzed plasma from 32 adalimumab‐treated and 20 infliximab‐treated psoriasis patients for evaluating trough levels of each drug. The presence of anti‐adalimumab and anti‐infliximab antibodies was analyzed and the severity of psoriasis was evaluated. At week 28, 25 out of 32 and at week 48, 21 out of 30 adalimumab‐treated patients maintained as more than PASI 75. At week 28, 12 out of 20 and at week 48, nine out of 18 infliximab‐treated patients were evaluated as more than PASI 75. In patients treated with 40 mg adalimumab every other week, the mean trough level was 7.62 μg/mL (range, 0.05–10.6) at week 48. In patients treated with 80 mg adalimumab every other week, the mean trough level was 8.61 μg/mL (range, 0.08–13.5) at week 48. Mean trough level of infliximab‐treated cases (4.1–5.2 mg/kg; mean, 4.6) was 4.64 μg/mL (range, 0.03–16.9) at week 48. Anti‐adalimumab antibody was detected in five out of 32 cases and anti‐infliximab antibody was detected in six out of 20 cases, respectively, at weeks 24 and 48. The optimal cut‐off values of adalimumab and infliximab concentration for more than PASI 75 were more than 7.84 μg/mL and more than 0.92 μg/mL, respectively. The trough levels of adalimumab and infliximab in psoriasis patients were positively associated with clinical response and were significantly lower in cases having anti‐adalimumab or anti‐infliximab antibodies.     

Long‐term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis treated for up to 5 years in the PHOENIX 1 study

Background Ongoing evaluation of biological agents in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis is needed to support their long‐term use. Objective To evaluate long‐term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab through 5 years in the PHOENIX 1 study. Methods Patients were randomized to placebo or ustekinumab (45 mg or 90 mg) at Weeks 0, 4 and every‐12‐weeks thereafter; placebo patients crossed‐over to ustekinumab at Week 12. Clinical response through Week 244 was evaluated using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in the Overall Population (i.e. patients receiving ≥1 dose of ustekinumab), Initial Responders (i.e. PASI 75 responders [Weeks 28/40] re‐randomized at Week 40 to continue every‐12‐week maintenance) and Partial Responders (i.e. <PASI 75 responders adjusted to every‐8‐week maintenance at Weeks 28 or 40). Safety endpoints were evaluated through Week 264 for the Overall Population. Results  Overall, 68.7% (517/753) of ustekinumab‐treated patients completed treatment through Week 244. Initial clinical responses were generally maintained through Week 244 (PASI 75: 63.4% and 72.0%; PASI 90: 39.7% and 49.0%; PASI 100: 21.6% and 26.4%) for patients receiving 45 mg and 90 mg, respectively. Similarly, PASI 75 responses were generally maintained among Initial Responders [79.1% (45 mg) and 80.8% (90 mg)] and Partial Responders [57.6% (45 mg) and 55.1% (90 mg)]. With 3104 patient‐years of follow‐up, rates of overall adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, serious infections, malignancies and major adverse cardiovascular events were generally consistent over time and comparable between doses. Conclusions Through 5 years of continuous treatment, ustekinumab demonstrated stable clinical response and a safety profile consistent with previous reports.     

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of secukinumab vs ixekizumab in moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis after 1 year of treatment: Real‐world practice

There are no studies which directly compare efficacy in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response of secukinumab and ixekizumab. The main aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of both drugs used to treat moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients over 52 weeks. Secondary objectives were to identify which factors related to prior biologic treatment influenced their efficacy and analyze data obtained at 12 weeks. A retrospective observational study was carried out, in which a group of the first 59 patients treated with secukinumab after its commercialization, was compared with another group of the first 29 patients treated with ixekizumab. The PASI 75, 90, and 100 response obtained at 52 weeks was 64.4%, 49.2%, and 41.4% for secukinumab and 75.9%, 62.1%, and 41.4% for ixekizumab, respectively, with no statistically significant differences. Regarding previous biological treatment, both treatments showed a decrease in efficacy as the number of prior biologics increases. No differences were found between secukinumab and ixekizumab in bio‐naïve or bio‐experienced patients, with the exception of a higher PASI 75 response at week 52 for ixekizumab in those patients with two or more previous biologics (P = .039) Secukinumab and ixekizumab have demonstrated high efficacy and safety, with no statistically significant differences.     

Drug survival rates in patients with psoriasis after treatment with biologics

Clinically, patients' adherence to biologic treatment is not only related to efficacy but also to adverse events, cost and other factors. To evaluate long‐term viability of biologic treatment, both the percentage of and reasons for discontinuation of treatment were investigated. In this study, patients treated with infliximab (n = 38), adalimumab (n = 59) and ustekinumab (n = 30) were included and observed for 12 months. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using a 75% reduction of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI‐75), and patients who discontinued treatment were considered as not having achieved PASI‐75. In addition, drug survival rate (DSR) was investigated. In patients treated with infliximab, PASI‐75 was 68.4% and DSR was 73.3% by the end of treatment. In patients treated with adalimumab, PASI‐75 was 50.8% and DSR was 79.7%. In patients treated with ustekinumab, PASI‐75 was 63.3% and DSR was 96.7%. Several patients discontinued treatment because of insufficient efficacy due to secondary failure in infliximab or primary failure in adalimumab. To increase treatment efficacy, it will be necessary for these patients to use an additional concomitant treatment. Higher efficacy is expected with biologics than with conventional treatments; however, the actual clinical efficacy over a long period of time may be insufficient if they are used without any concomitant treatments.