Responses to ustekinumab in the anti‐TNF agent‐naïve vs. anti‐TNF agent‐exposed patients with psoriasis vulgaris

Background Approximately 20–30% of patients with psoriasis treated with anti‐tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) agents will discontinue treatment within 2 years due to loss of efficacy or side‐effects. Switching to another anti‐TNFα agent produces clinical responses inferior to previously untreated patients. Ustekinumab binds to the p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)‐12 and IL‐23 and provides a mechanism of action independent of TNFα. Objective To investigate the efficacy of ustekinumab in a clinical practice setting and to compare treatment responses to ustekinumab in patients previously treated with TNFα inhibitors and anti‐TNFα‐naïve patients. Methods Patients receiving either ustekinumab (n = 71) or the subcutaneous TNFα inhibitors adalimumab or etanercept (n = 108) were identified through the registry of psoriasis patients in our Institutions. Efficacy effect outcome was a 75% improvement in the psoriasis area severity index (PASI75). Kaplan–Meier statistics evaluated the adherence to the treatments expressed as drug survival rate. Results PASI75 was achieved in 80% of the ustekinumab‐treated patients after a median time of 112 days. There was no difference in efficacy in anti‐TNFα‐naïve patients compared with anti‐TNFα unresponsive patients. Patients treated with ustekinumab showed a superior adherence to treatment in comparison with adalimumab and etanercept. Limitations Patients were non‐randomly assigned to treatment, which potentially may lead to biases. Observation time was short (1 year). Conclusion In clinical practice, the short‐term efficacy and patient adherence to ustekinumab are excellent and comparable to the data obtained in clinical trials. Lack of response to previous anti‐TNF treatment does not impair clinical response to ustekinumab.     

Elevation of serum KL‐6 in patients with psoriasis treated with anti‐tumour necrosis factor‐α therapy

We report three patients with psoriasis whose serum level of Krebs Von Den Lungen (KL)‐6 increased during therapy with anti‐tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α. A diagnosis of early‐phase or subclinical interstitial pneumonia was made in two patients, and their KL‐6 level decreased after anti‐TNF‐α discontinuation. The rise in KL‐6 in the other patient was attributed to methotrexate. We propose that serum KL‐6 should be monitored routinely in patients treated with anti‐TNF agents.     

Impact of anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α agents on serum levels of KL‐6 and surfactant protein‐D in patients with psoriasis

We longitudinally examined the influence of anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α treatment on serum levels of KL‐6 and surfactant protein‐D (SP‐D). The study group comprised 22 patients with psoriasis treated with infliximab or adalimumab and with no history of interstitial lung disease (ILD). KL‐6 and SP‐D levels were measured in serum samples. Twelve of the 22 patients (55%) showed at least a 20% increase in KL‐6 levels compared with baseline. Of these 12 patients, none exhibited any signs of ILD on chest computed tomography and nine who showed an increase in KL‐6 levels (75%) showed at least a 20% increase in SP‐D levels. Some patients showed simultaneous increases in KL‐6 and SP‐D levels after treatment with anti‐TNF‐α agents. Although these patients may have undetectable or subtle alveolar damage, careful observation is needed.     

Asymmetric dimethylarginine but not osteoprotegerin correlates with disease severity in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis undergoing anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α therapy

Patients with psoriasis, in particular those with severe disease, have an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events compared with the general population. The aim of the present study is to determine whether correlation between asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and osteoprotegerin (OPG), two biomarkers associated with CV disease, and disease severity may exist in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. We also aimed to establish if baseline serum levels of these two biomarkers could correlate with the degree of change in the clinical parameters of disease severity following the use of anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α therapy in these patients. This was a prospective study on a series of consecutive non‐diabetic patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis who completed 6 months of therapy with anti‐TNF‐α‐adalimumab. Patients with kidney disease, hypertension or body mass index of 35 kg/m² or more were excluded. Metabolic and clinical evaluation was performed immediately prior to the onset of treatment and at month 6. Twenty‐nine patients were assessed. Unlike OPG, a significant positive correlation between ADMA and resistin serum levels was found at the onset of adalimumab and also after 6 months of biologic therapy. We also observed a positive correlation between the percent of body surface area affected (BSA) and ADMA levels obtained before the onset of adalimumab and a negative correlation between baseline ADMA levels and a 6‐month BSA change compared with baseline results. In patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis, ADMA levels correlate with clinical markers of disease severity.     

Oxidative stress and psoriasis: the effect of antitumour necrosis factor‐α inhibitor treatment

Background Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory skin condition associated with a high frequency of cardiovascular events. Modifications of plasma lipids, and an increase in the levels of biochemical markers of inflammation and lipid peroxidation have been reported in subjects with psoriasis, suggesting a relationship between psoriasis, inflammation and oxidative damage. Objectives To investigate whether modulation of inflammatory activity by tumour necrosis factor‐α inhibitors in patients with psoriasis is associated with modification of lipid profiles, oxidative stress and paraoxonase (PON)1 activity. Methods The levels of plasma lipids and lipoprotein(a), and the levels of the markers of inflammation and lipid peroxidation were evaluated in subjects with psoriasis (n = 23) before and after 24 weeks of treatment with etanercept. In the same subjects plasma total antioxidant capacity and the activity of PON1, an antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory enzyme associated with the high‐density lipoproteins (HDLs), were investigated. Results The results showed that clinical improvement in patients with psoriasis treated with etanercept is associated with a reduction in the levels of inflammatory markers [C‐reactive protein (CRP)] and lipid peroxidation, and also with increased antioxidant capacity in the serum of patients with psoriasis. These modifications are associated with a significant increase in the activity of PON1. A significant increase in the PON1/CRP ratio has also been observed in patients with psoriasis after treatment. The significant inverse correlation between CRP and PON1 activity suggests a relationship between PON1 activity and inflammation. Conclusions Treatment with etanercept is associated with a reduction in lipid peroxidation and an improvement in HDL antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory properties.     

Clinical applicability of T‐cell interferon‐α release assay for tumour necrosis factor‐α inhibitor therapy in severe psoriasis

Many studies have found that screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis (TB) before starting treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐α inhibitors reduces associated TB infections. The new T‐cell interferon‐α release assay (TIGRA), is more specific and sensitive for detection of latent TB compared with the tuberculin skin test (TST). We report results of TIGRA in our first 63 patients commencing TNF‐α inhibitors for severe psoriasis. Of the 63 patients, 5 (7.9%) had a positive TIGRA result and were started on treatment for latent TB. We found that the only risk factor for TB associated with a positive TIGRA was a history of travel to countries with high TB incidence. To our knowledge, this is the first study to identify the background risk (7.9%) of latent TB in an endemic UK population. This result emphasizes the importance of TIGRA testing to reduce the risk of TB in patients treated with TNF‐α inhibitor.     

Tropisetron via α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor suppresses tumor necrosis factor‐α‐mediated cell responses of human keratinocytes

Tropisetron is a serotonin receptor (5‐HT‐R)‐modulating agent and approved as an antiemetic for patients undergoing chemotherapy. In the gut, it acts via specific serotonin receptors, 5‐HT₃‐R, to elicit its beneficial effects against nausea. We investigated whether tropisetron can affect inflammatory cell responses of human primary epidermal keratinocytes (NHK) which are key cells in the regulation of skin homoeostasis. Tropisetron significantly and dose‐dependently suppressed tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α‐mediated mRNA expression and protein secretion of interleukin (IL)‐6 and IL‐8 in these cells. This effect of tropisetron was independent of p65/NF‐κB as shown by various NF‐κB signal transduction read‐outs. Importantly, the anti‐inflammatory tropisetron effect on NHK was neither mediated by 5‐HT₃‐R nor 5‐HT₄‐R since these receptors were absent in NHK. In contrast, NHK expressed α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (α7nAchR) which previously were found to bind tropisetron. The α7nAchR antagonist α‐bungarotoxin neutralized, whereas AR‐R17779, a specific α7nAchR agonist, mimicked the suppressive effect of tropisetron on TNF‐α‐mediated IL‐6 and IL‐8 expression in NHK. Our findings suggest that tropisetron and probably other α7nAchR‐activating agents could be useful for the future therapy of inflammatory skin diseases.     

Combination therapy of cyclosporine and anti‐tumor necrosis factor α in psoriasis: a case series of 10 patients

Combination therapy has become important in treating psoriasis, using synergism between different mechanisms to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity. Little has been published on the combination of cyclosporine and anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents. In this study, a retrospective chart review was made of the effects of this combination therapy in 10 patients with recalcitrant psoriasis. Treatment included a conditioning phase with cyclosporine, 3.14 ± 0.37 mg/kg for 4.6 ± 2 weeks, and a combination phase during which etanercept/adalimumab were initiated and cyclosporine was tapered over 10.2 ± 3.7 weeks. Treatment success, evaluated after each phase, was classified as complete recovery (CR, more than 75% improvement), partial response (PR, 25–75% improvement), and no response (NR, less than 25% improvement). All patients reached CR at the end of the combination therapy. Two were still on combination therapy after 12 and 20 weeks. Adverse event occurred in three cases, all in the conditioning phase. We conclude that combination therapy with cyclosporine and anti‐TNF α appears to offer an effective and safe approach to treatment of psoriasis.