Colonic low‐grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and orthotopic endometrial stromal tumor with limited infiltration sharing the JAZF1‐SUZ12 gene fusion

Endometrial stromal tumors (ESTs) are composed of cells resembling endometrial stroma, and are divided into benign and malignant types based on morphology. Endometrial stromal nodule (ESN) is a benign localized tumor, and endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is an infiltrative and potentially metastatic neoplasm. A series of genetic aberrations contribute to pathological diagnosis of ESTs. At present, subsets of ESN and ESS‐low grade (ESS‐LG) are characterized as JAZF1‐SUZ12/JJAZ1 gene fusion. The ESTs that show higher grade atypia but lack nuclear pleomorphism include YWHAE‐FAM22 ESS. Here we report an unusual case of ESTs. Sudden colonic perforation occurred to the patient, and emergency surgery was performed. Pathological findings suggested metastatic ESS. Thorough medical examination of the genital organs detected a 1 cm‐sized well‐demarcated uterine tumor. Microscopically, the tumor lacked infiltrative features, conforming to the definition of ESN. Both lesions demonstrated identical cytology and shared JAZF1‐SUZ12 gene fusion. Endometriosis was not found in any areas of the resected organs, strongly suggesting that the uterine orthotopic tumor metastasized. The current case uncovered the problems of differential diagnosis between ESN and ESS‐LG. We demonstrate detailed pathological features of the two lesions, and discuss the possibility of orthotopic EST with limited infiltration to develop into ESS‐LG.     

Endometrial stromal sarcoma – the new genetic paradigm

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a gynaecological sarcoma that is composed of cells that resemble those of proliferative‐phase endometrial stroma. The 2014 World Health Organization tumour classification system separates ESS into low‐grade and high‐grade types, which are histologically, genetically and clinically distinct from undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). Low‐grade ESSs frequently contain chromosomal rearrangements that result in JAZF1–SUZ12 fusion or equivalent genetic fusions. Although most low‐grade ESSs show classic histological features that closely resemble those of proliferative‐phase endometrial stroma, there are several histological variants that are associated with the same genetic fusions as seen in the classic type. High‐grade ESS is defined by the presence of YWHAE–NUTM2A/B (YWHAE–FAM22A/B) fusions. High‐grade ESSs are clinically more aggressive than low‐grade ESSs, but are associated with a lower mortality rate than UUSs. The histological and immunophenotypic features of these different types of ESS, and their diagnostic considerations, are the subjects of this review.     

Hepatic endometrial stromal sarcoma

Endometrial stromal sarcomas are rare tumors that may recur or metastasize many years after their initial presentation. Though most recurrences are within the pelvis, distant metastases can occur, and are most common to the lungs. Metastases to the liver are extremely rare. Herein we report two cases of endometrial stromal sarcoma with metastases to the liver without a prior history of endometriosis, accompanied by their histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis in the context of a relevant literature review.     

Prognostic indicators in WHO 2003 low‐grade endometrial stromal sarcoma

Aims: Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) has traditionally been divided into low and high grade, but the World Health Organization (WHO, 2003) has changed the definition. Since 2003, many studies have used the old criteria, and few have focused on WHO 2003‐defined ESS low grade (ESS‐LG). The aim of this study was to investigate prognosticators in ESS‐LG. Methods and results: We reviewed the WHO 2003 diagnostic criteria in 91 tumours (previously classified as ESS low and high grade). There were 68 cases of ESS‐LG and 23 of undifferentiated endometrial sarcoma (UES). In the ESS‐LG cases, the prognostic value of clinicopathological variables was studied. With a median follow‐up of 79 months (range: 20–474 months), the recurrence and death rates were 5/68 (7%) and 1/68 (1.5%) in the ESS‐LG cases. Ovarian preservation or no ovarian preservation (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 10.4) and mitotic activity index (MAI) (0–3 versus >3, P = 0.005, HR 8.6) had independent prognostic value. Other frequently used MAI thresholds – age, tumour diameter, and vessel invasion – were not prognostic. Among patients without ovarian preservation (n = 61), none of 53 with MAI 0–3 suffered recurrence, contrasting with two of eight (25%) of those with MAI >3 (P = 0.003); one of these two recurrence patients died (P = 0.02). Among patients with ovarian preservation (n = 7), three (43%) suffered recurrence but none died, and MAI had no additional prognostic value. Conclusions: In ESS‐LG, ovarian preservation and MAI >3 are associated with increased risk of recurrence.     

Expanding the molecular spectrum of gene fusions in endometrial stromal sarcoma: Novel subunits of the chromatin remodeling complexes PRC2 and NuA4/TIP60 as alternative fusion partners

Endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) are morphologically and molecularly heterogeneous. We report novel gene fusions (EPC1::EED, EPC1::EZH2, ING3::PHF1) identified by targeted RNA sequencing in five cases. The ING3::PHF1-fusion positive ESS presented in a 58-year-old female as extrauterine mesocolonic, ovarian masses, and displayed large, monomorphic ovoid-to-epithelioid cells arranged in solid sheets. The patient remained alive with disease 13 months after surgery. The three ESS with EPC1::EED occurred in the uterine corpus in patients with a median age of 58 years (range 27–62 years). One tumor showed a uniform epithelioid nested morphology, while the other two were composed of monomorphic spindle cells in fascicles with elevated mitotic figures, focal tumor cell necrosis, and lymphovascular invasion. At a median follow-up of 20 months, two patients developed local recurrence, including one with concomitant distant metastasis, while one patient remained free of disease. All three patients were alive at the last follow-up. The EPC1::EZH2-fusion positive ESS presented in a 52-year-old female in the uterus, and displayed uniform spindled cells arranged in short fascicles, with focally elevated mitotic activity but without necrosis. The patient remained free of disease 3 months after surgery. All cases were diffusely positive for CD10; four diffusely express estrogen and progesterone receptors. Our study expands the molecular spectrum of EPC1 and PHF1-related gene fusions in ESS to include additional novel subunits of the PRC2 and/or NuA4/TIP60 complexes. These cases displayed a monomorphic epithelioid or spindled phenotype, spanning low-grade and high-grade cytomorphology, all expressing CD10 and commonly ER and PR, and are prone to local and/or distant spread.     

High‐grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with smooth muscle and skeletal muscle differentiation: Report of a case with cytomorphologic and immunocytologic analysis

We report a case of high‐grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with cytological and immunocytochemical findings. Cytologically, major tumor cells showed round‐to‐short spindle shapes with round‐ to oval‐shaped nuclei and moderately abundant delicate cytoplasm. Tumor cells with tapered shapes and eccentric nuclei were also observed. A few spindle cells having enlarged cigar‐shaped nuclei with conspicuous nucleoli and delicate wispy cytoplasm, which resembled leiomyosarcoma, were intermingled. One rhabdomyoblast cell with both α‐sarcomeric muscle actin and myoglobin was also observed. Most of the tumor cells, including the leiomyosarcomatous spindle cells, were positive for CD10, and negative for desmin and h‐caldesmon. Accordingly, when relatively monotonous round‐to‐short spindle tumor cells and taper‐shaped tumor cells are observed in the female genital tract, high‐grade endometrial stromal sarcoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Immunocytochemistry contributed to the correct diagnosis. This case was high‐grade endometrial stromal sarcoma with smooth muscle and skeletal muscle differentiation. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Spectrum of mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients – a population‐based study from Slovakia

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of gastrointestinal tract and are characterized by presence of mutations in tyrosine kinases cKIT (KIT) and PDGFRα (PDGFRA). Mutations identified are highly heterogeneous, but some mutations are associated with specific clinical features of the tumor. Samples from 278 GIST patients collected during the period 2004–2011 were screened for mutations in exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 of KIT and 12, 14 and 18 of PDGFRA. Results of mutation screening were summarized and tested for possible association with clinical parameters of tumors. Mutations were identified in 83.81% of patients. Most frequent mutations were found in KIT exon 11 reaching frequency of 62.95%. Other exons contributed to the mutation pool with frequencies 8.27%, 7.55%, 2.52%, 1.44%, 1.08%, and 0.00%, in decreasing order KIT exon 9, PDGRFA exons 18 and 12, KIT exon 13, PDGFRA exon 14, and KIT exon 17. General linear model analysis showed no effect of any individual analyzed mutation on the phenotypic variables, but we confirmed association between mutations KIT exon 9 p. 503‐504_dup2, and PDGFRA exon 18 p. D842V and intestinal and gastric localization of tumors.     

‘I Can’t Keep Up!’: an update on advances in soft tissue pathology occurring after the publication of the 2020 World Health Organization classification of soft tissue and bone tumours

Progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis and diagnosis of soft tissue neoplasia is exceptionally rapid. Although the most recent World Health Organization classification of soft tissue tumours contains many new entities and refinements of older ones, even this comprehensive document is by now incomplete or in need of modification. This review will attempt to summarise the developments in soft tissue pathology that have occurred since 2020, emphasising lesions for which morphology and genetics intersect in a complementary fashion. Novel entities discussed include KMT2A-rearranged sarcoma, PRRX::NCOAx fibroblastic tumours, EWSR1::PATZ1 sarcomas, BRAF-altered infantile fibrosarcoma-like lesions, NUTM1-rearranged colorectal sarcomas, and a variety of interesting giant cell-rich and matrix-producing lesions. In addition, recently described mimics of atypical lipomatous tumour/well-differentiated liposarcoma are covered, as is a wholly new, morphologically defined and genetically confirmed entity, pseudoendocrine sarcoma. Finally, exciting new developments in the use of immunohistochemistry as a surrogate for molecular genetic techniques are discussed.