The use of off-label medications in substance abuse treatment programs

Abstract

Background: Substance use disorder (SUD) treatment centers serve a population of clients who have diverse needs, and may desire or require access to varied treatments while seeking care for their SUDs. While pharmacotherapies have increased in popularity for the treatment of SUDs, adoption rates do remain quite low. But a wider array of pharmacotherapies has become available in recent years which may shift the trend. This article helps shed light on how variations in SUD treatment centers develop and persist with regard to the adoption and delivery of off-label medications. Methods: We use a nationally representative and longitudinal sample of SUD treatment centers in the US (N?=?196). We use a logistic regression to analyze the relationship between organizational characteristics and offering any medications, off-label. We also use a negative binomial regression to analyze the relationship between organizational characteristics and the number of medications that were used off-label. Results: Our findings reveal that older centers, accredited centers, and centers that offer mental health screenings are all positively associated with the provision of off-label medication in SUD treatment. We also find a positive relationship between private funding and offering a greater number of off-label medications. Conclusions: Our results suggest that SUD clients who seek treatment from centers that offer medications off-label, may have access to a greater number of medication-assisted treatment options.     

On-site provision of substance abuse treatment services at community health centers

We examined on-site and off-site referral-based provision of substance abuse (SA) treatment services among a sample of community health centers (CHCs). Analyses used survey data collected from CHCs in three states merged with administrative claims to both characterize CHC care delivery models and examine the association between models and care quality. Care quality was based on the Washington Circle measures of initiation and engagement. Approximately half the sample provided at least some SA treatment services on site. The provision of intensive outpatient treatment services on site was associated with significantly higher engagement rates. It was also associated with higher (but not significantly) initiation rates. At the same time, on-site provision of screening and counseling services was negatively associated with both initiation and engagement rates. Given limited resources, investing in more intensive services on site may yield better outcomes for CHC patients than lower level services, but further study is recommended.     

Social functioning outcomes among individuals with substance use disorders receiving internet-delivered community reinforcement approach

Background: The community reinforcement approach (CRA) is an evidence-based practice for the treatment of substance use disorders and achieving and maintaining abstinence, but few studies have systematically explored the effect of CRA on secondary, yet also important outcomes, such as social functioning. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine whether an internet-based version of the CRA plus contingency management is associated with improved social functioning of individuals seeking substance use disorder treatment in a multi-site clinical effectiveness trial. Methods: Social functioning was measured using the 54-item Social Adjustment Scale assessing role performance in six domains (work, social and leisure activities, extended family relationships, marital relationship, parenting, and immediate family). Generalized linear mixed models tested the effects of treatment, time, sex, baseline abstinence, baseline social functioning and baseline psychological distress on overall social functioning and across social functioning subscales at the end of the 12-week treatment phase and 3 and 6 months post treatment. Results: Results showed no significant association between treatment and total social functioning score or any subscale scores. Being male was significantly associated with better social functioning overall at the end of treatment (p = .024). Higher levels of psychological distress at baseline predicted significantly worse social functioning at the end of treatment overall (p = .037). Conclusions: The addition of an internet-based version of the CRA was not associated with greater improvements in social functioning compared to standard outpatient care after 12?weeks of treatment. Implications for internet-delivered CRA are discussed.     

Patients' perspectives on care management services for complex substance use disorders

Although care management approaches have potential to improve clinical outcomes and reduce high health care costs of patients with complex substance use disorders, characterized by high psychosocial, psychological, and/or medical needs and high acute health care utilization, little is known about patients' perspectives or experiences with these interventions. The objectives of this study were to identify barriers and facilitators to patient engagement in care management services for complex substance use disorders from patients' perspectives. This pilot study invited 22 men with complex substance use disorders and high health care utilization who were enrolled in a 1-year open trial of a Care Management Model to complete semi-structured interviews at 1- and 3-months post-baseline. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using template analysis. Five themes related to engagement were identified: barriers to conventional substance use disorder treatment, facilitators of care management services, patient–provider relationship, patient-related factors, and enhancements to a Care Management Model. Results highlighted the importance of the patient–provider relationship, individual visits with providers, flexible and personalized treatment, and a focus on recovery over abstinence in promoting patient engagement in care management services. Results also highlighted a need for increased outreach and assistance with housing and transit to treatment. Patients' perspectives support key elements of the care management services that are designed to facilitate patient engagement and suggest the need for additional outreach and assistance with obtaining shelter and transportation. Additional research is needed to evaluate if care management approaches enhance retention, improve outcomes, and reduce health care utilization of patients with complex and chronic substance use disorders.     

Utilizing Bloom's taxonomy to design a substance use disorders course for health professions students

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) are a public health problem affecting millions of Americans. Despite their prevalence, there are few health care resources allocated for SUDs treatment. Relatively few health care professionals are exposed to SUDs education in their respective programs, which may be one reason for this resource insufficiency. In hopes of rectifying this gap, the authors developed a SUDs course for health professions students combining classroom learning with practical application to patient care. Methods: The authors used Bloom's taxonomy of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning domains as an educational framework to create numerous opportunities for students to deepen their knowledge, assess their attitudes, and develop their motivational interviewing skills. The primary outcome of the study was a comparison of students' scores on the Substance Abuse Attitude Scale (SAAS) pre- and post-course completion. Secondary outcome was to compare students' self-assessment scores of their patient counseling with residents' assessments of them on the Liverpool Communication Skills Assessment Scale (LCSAS). Results: One hundred twelve students participated in the authors' SUDs course over a 9-month period. Ninety-five students completed both the pre- and post-course SAAS surveys. The total SAAS survey score and individual domain scores for nonmoralizing, treatment optimism, and treatment intervention demonstrated significant improvement post-course. Eighty-nine students completed a motivational interview with a patient. Eighty students had a LCSAS self-assessment paired with a residents' assessment. Mean scores for individual items on the LCSAS for both groups' assessment were approximately 3.5, indicating that students' communication was assessed as “acceptable” to “good.” Conclusions: This study demonstrates that Bloom's taxonomy was a useful educational framework to ensure a systematic development of the authors' SUDs course. Through participation in our course, students touched each of the 3 domains in Bloom's taxonomy. The authors believe their course design may serve as a framework for future SUDs courses.     

A clinical instrument to guide brief interventions for adolescents with substance use concerns

ABSTRACT

Background: Adolescent substance use is an important public health problem in New Mexico and the United States. The New Mexico Department of Health school-based health centers (SBHCs) universally administer a validated screen, the CRAFFT (Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble), for adolescent substance use concerns; however, quality assurance efforts revealed that SBHC providers needed more information at the point of screening to initiate brief interventions for students with positive CRAFFT screens. The CHISPA (Cocaine, Heroin, IV drugs, Synthetic pot, Pot, Alcohol) was developed to gather specific information on recent substance use experience to guide brief interventions. This paper describes the development and initial reliability and validity of data obtained using the CHISPA instrument. Methods: In 2015, 99 high school–aged SBHC users in Albuquerque, New Mexico, completed the CRAFFT and CHISPA twice over 2 weeks using standard test-retest methods. Using the CHISPA, students reported for the prior 3 months substances used, frequency of use, and signs of addiction or acute danger (adverse events). Results: Retest reliability for the CRAFFT score was 0.82. CHISPA retest reliabilities were 0.75 for alcohol use; 0.91 for having used any substances; 0.92 for number of substances used; 0.81 for frequency of substance use; and 0.79 for number of adverse events. CRAFFT scores correlated with CHISPA measures of number of substances used at 0.62; with frequency of substance use at 0.58; and with number of adverse events at 0.64. Conclusions: CHISPA measures show preliminary evidence of reliability and validity. SBHC providers and other providers in primary care settings who use the CRAFFT screen may benefit from using the CHISPA to define recent substance use experience to guide brief interventions for adolescents with substance use concerns. The CHISPA instrument is currently being tested in electronic form in selected SBHCs in the state of New Mexico.     

Working with controlled use as a goal in regular substance use outpatient treatment in Amsterdam

Controlled substance use as a goal of treatment is controversial. Acceptance seems to vary by country and by type of service but has been studied mostly in hypothetical cases. Observation of regular practice in outpatient treatment services of The Jellinek, Amsterdam, reveals how often controlled use is actually chosen, how this goal is communicated and how it relates to treatment outcome. Twenty-one counsellors were surveyed and files of 202 randomly selected clients investigated. Controlled use as a treatment goal is mostly the result of negotiation; temporary abstinence is more often proposed by the counsellor and abstinence more often by the client. Factors influencing choices are described. Controlled use is related to lower dropout than temporary abstinence but temporary abstinence is related to better treatment outcome. It is concluded that controlled use can enhance treatment retention but the results discourage too lenient an attitude towards acceptance.     

Comorbidity of generalized anxiety disorder and alcohol use disorders among individuals seeking outpatient substance abuse treatment

The present study sought to address a gap in the literature by providing preliminary evidence of the prevalence and clinical characteristics of comorbid generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and alcohol use disorders (AUD) in a front-line outpatient substance abuse clinic. Of 39 outpatients meeting criteria for an AUD, nearly half (46%) also met criteria for current GAD. The onset of GAD occurred prior to AUD in 67% of comorbid cases, with an average time lag of 12.5 years among individuals with primary GAD. Participants with comorbid GAD–AUD endorsed higher levels of worry severity and worry-reduction alcohol expectancies, and 55.6% of comorbid participants had a history of suicide attempts. Groups did not differ on anxiety sensitivity, social anxiety, or depression. Comorbid participants were more likely to indicate that worry interfered with their substance abuse treatment, and to indicate interest in concurrent treatment targeting their worry. Study findings provide initial evidence that GAD may be a prevalent and relevant factor among individuals with AUD seeking outpatient substance abuse treatment.     

Detection of substance use disorders in patients presenting with depression

Comorbidity between substance use disorders and major depression may complicate the treatment and adversely affect the outcome of either disorder. This study examines the frequency with which patients presenting with depression are evaluated for a substance use disorder in a university‐based family medicine residency program. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify 200 patients age 18 and older, seen between June 1, 1989, and June 1, 1999, who were diagnosed with depression (DSM IV code 300.4 or 311.0). The records were divided into two strata based on whether they were seen by resident or faculty physicians. The records were then reviewed for evidence of substance use screening. The overall percentage of patients with depression and evaluated for substance use disorders was calculated, and further stratified as to gender, age, previous psychiatric diagnosis, and previous substance use disorder diagnosis. Family physicians evaluated outpatients with a diagnosis of depression for substance use disorders only 24.5% of the time. Faculty evaluated depressed patients 18%, compared to residents doing so in 31 % of patients. Male patients were evaluated 34.7% as compared to 21.2 % of females. Patients over age 70 were screened at a rate of only 10.7%. Given the observed prevalence of substance use disorders in patients with a diagnosis of depression is between 40 and 50%, our finding that our depressed patients were evaluated for substance use disorders only 24.5% of the time, suggests that family physicians may be missing a significant number of patients with comorbid disease.     

A review of research on residential programs for people with severe mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders

Substance use disorder is the most common and clinically significant co-morbidity among clients with severe mental illnesses, associated with poor treatment response, homelessness and other adverse outcomes. Residential programs for clients with dual disorders integrate mental health treatment, substance abuse interventions, housing and other supports. Ten controlled studies suggest that greater levels of integration of substance abuse and mental health services are more effective than less integration. Because the research is limited by methodological problems, further research is needed to establish the effectiveness of residential programs, to characterize important program elements, to establish methods to improve engagement into and retention in residential programs and to clarify which clients benefit from this type of service. [Brunette MF, Mueser KT, Drake RE. A review of research on residential programs for people with severe mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Rev 2004;23:471-481]     

Racial/ethnic subgroup differences in outcomes and acceptability of an Internet-delivered intervention for substance use disorders

ABSTRACT

The Therapeutic Education System (TES), an Internet version of the Community Reinforcement Approach plus prize-based motivational incentives, is one of few empirically supported technology-based interventions. To date, however, there has not been a study exploring differences in substance use outcomes or acceptability of TES among racial/ethnic subgroups. This study uses data from a multisite (N?=?10) effectiveness study of TES to explore whether race/ethnicity subgroups (White [n?=?267], Black/African American [n?=?112], and Hispanic/Latino [n?=?55])moderate the effect of TES. Generalized linear mixed models were used to test whether abstinence, retention, social functioning, coping, craving, or acceptability differed by racial/ethnic subgroup. Findings demonstrated that race/ethnicity did not moderate the effect of TES versus TAU on abstinence, retention, social functioning, or craving. A three-way interaction (treatment, race/ethnicity, and abstinence status at study entry) showed that TES was associated with greater coping scores among nonabstinent White participants (p?=?.008) and among abstinent Black participants (p?<?.001). Acceptability of the TES intervention, although high overall, was significantly different by race/ethnicity subgroup with White participants reporting lower acceptability of TES compared to Black (p?=?.006) and Hispanic/Latino (p?=?.008) participants. TES appears to be a good candidate treatment among a diverse population of treatment-seeking individuals with substance use disorders.     

A cross-national study on Mexico-US migration, substance use and substance use disorders

Background

Epidemiologic research has consistently found lower prevalence of alcohol and drug use disorders among Hispanic immigrants to the US than among US-born Hispanics. Recent research has begun to examine how this change occurs in the process of assimilation in the US. We aimed to study immigration, US nativity, and return migration as risk factors for alcohol and drug use among people of Mexican origin in both the US and Mexico.

Methods

Data come from nationally representative surveys in the United States (2001-2003; n = 1208) and Mexico (2001-2002; n = 5782). We used discrete time event history models to account for time-varying and time-invariant characteristics.

Results

We found no evidence that current Mexican immigrants in the US have higher risk for alcohol or alcohol use disorders than Mexicans living in Mexico, but current immigrants were at higher risk for drug use and drug use disorders. Current Mexican immigrants were at lower risk for drug use and drug disorders than US-born Mexican-Americans. US nativity, regardless of parent nativity, is the main factor associated with increasing use of alcohol and drugs. Among families of migrants and among return migrants we found increased risk for alcohol use, drug use and alcohol and drug use disorders. Evidence of selective migration and return of immigrants with disorders was found regarding alcohol use disorders only.

Conclusions

Research efforts that combine populations from sending and receiving countries are needed. This effort will require much more complex research designs that will call for true international collaboration.     

Perceptions of behavioral health care among veterans with substance use disorders: Results from a national evaluation of mental health services in the Veterans Health Administration

Understanding patients' perceptions of care is essential for health care systems. We examined predictors of perceptions of behavioral health care (satisfaction with care, helpfulness of care, and perceived improvement) among veterans with substance use disorders (SUD; n = 1,581) who participated in a phone survey as part of a national evaluation of mental health services in the U.S. Veterans Health Administration. In multivariate analyses, SUD specialty care utilization and higher mental health functioning were associated positively with all perceptions of care, and comorbid schizophrenia, bipolar, and PTSD were associated positively with multiple perceptions of care. Perceived helpfulness of care was associated with receipt of SUD specialty care in the prior 12 months (adjusted OR = 1.77, p < .001). Controlling for patient characteristics, satisfaction with care exhibited strong associations with perceptions of staff as supportive and empathic, whereas perceived improvement was strongly linked to the perception that staff helped patients develop goals beyond symptom management. Survey responses that account for variation in SUD patients' perceptions of care could inform and guide quality improvement efforts with this population.     

Some new directions for research on psychological interventions for comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders

Issues. Comorbidity between anxiety and substance use disorders is common, yet it is poorly understood and poorly treated. Approach. Narrative literature review. PsycINFO and Medline databases were searched for clinical trials of anxiety and substance use disorders using clinical queries for 2005–2009. Key Findings. There are few well‐conducted treatment outcome trials for comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders. Some recent (2005–2009) outcome literature has focused on specific mechanisms (anxiety sensitivity and tension reduction alcohol expectancies) that may underlie comorbidity between anxiety and substance use disorders and may lead to more targeted intervention. Implications and Conclusion: The research base for understanding and treating comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders needs to be broadened. In particular research is needed with a focus on: (i) specifying particular comorbid relationships between anxiety and substance use disorders; (ii) the mechanisms that may underlie and maintain those relationships; and (iii) well‐conducted evaluations of treatments that target those mechanisms.[Baillie AJ, Stapinski L, Crome E, Morley K, Sannibale C, Haber P, Teesson M. Some new directions for research on psychological interventions for comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Rev 2010;29;518–524]