“桥”式修补术治疗阴道前壁膨出的疗效分析

目的 探讨阴道前壁“桥”式缝合术治疗阴道前壁脱垂的疗效.方法 回顾性分析自2007年7月至2013年5月,采用手术治疗阴道前壁脱垂58例患者的临床资料,其中阴道前壁“桥”式缝合术30例,传统的阴道前壁修补术28例;比较两种术式的近期疗效.结果 阴道前壁“桥”式缝合术的手术时间为(21.50±3.80) min,术中出血量为(30.00 ±3.20)ml,术后复发率为3.33％,与传统术式的手术时间(48.50±3.50) min、术中出血量(74.00±5.60) ml、术后复发率14.29％进行比较,其差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 与传统术式比较,“桥”式缝合术治疗阴道前壁脱垂的手术时间短,术中出血少,术后复发率低,近期疗效满意.     

Paravaginal defects: prevalence and accuracy of preoperative detection

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of paravaginal defects and to report the correlation between diagnosing a paravaginal defect preoperatively and observing the presence of one intraoperatively. This was a prospective study in which 77 patients with at least stage 2 prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall who desired surgical correction of their prolapse were assessed pre- and intraoperatively for the detection of a paravaginal defect. In order to differentiate a midline or central defect from a paravaginal defect, an index finger or ring forceps was placed vaginally toward each ischial spine separately. If the prolapse became reduced, the patient was clinically diagnosed with a paravaginal defect on that side. The intraoperative visualization or palpation of the pubocervical fascia detached from the arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis was used as the gold standard in diagnosing a paravaginal defect. The overall prevalence of a paravaginal defect in patients with at least stage 2 prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall was 37.7%. The sensitivities for detecting a left, right and bilateral paravaginal defect were 47.6, 40.0 and 23.5%, respectively, while the specificities for each side were 71.4, 67.3, and 80.0%, respectively. The overall prevalence of a paravaginal defect in patients with anterior vaginal wall prolapse is low. The standard clinical evaluation used to preoperatively detect a paravaginal defect in our hands is a poor predictor for the actual presence of a paravaginal defect.Editorial Comment: This paper adds to the growing debate regarding paravaginal defects. Currently there are many opinions regarding the prevalence and our clinical ability to diagnose paravaginal defects. The classic techniques used to detect these defects clinically is called into question with the findings of this study and this data needs to be verified by other investigators, but it appears that relying on physical findings will not allow for pre-operative planning. Several surgeons argue that it doesnt matter what you find in the clinic but that you should be prepared to correct what you find in the operating room. This is true for the skilled and experienced pelvic surgeon but for those doing the majority of the anterior repairs a vaginal paravaginal repair is beyond their level of surgical skills. If it becomes generally accepted that a paravaginal repair is significantly superior to a simple anterior colporraphy, then we will need to be able to recognize these defects pre-operatively and get these patients to a skilled pelvic surgeon.     

Laparoscopic paravaginal repair: a new technique using mesh and staples.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a new technique of paravaginal repair, utilizing Prolene mesh and a hernia stapler. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case series review of 12 patients who underwent laparoscopic bladder neck suspension, who were clinically diagnosed with cystocele caused by paravaginal defects. The patients had paravaginal repair performed utilizing mesh and staples. Prolene mesh was stapled to the vaginal margin and suspended from Cooper's ligament. The technique is described and demonstrated in a line drawing. RESULTS: All procedures were completed without incident. No additional blood loss or other morbidity has been identified. Results were evaluated by history and examination. Subjective improvement was noted in 10 of 11 patients. Objective improvement was found in 9 of 11. Adverse effects were not identified. One patient was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: This procedure is potentially an alternative method for performing the paravaginal repair by a minimally invasive route. We feel that this makes the procedure potentially safer, quicker, and more accessible to laparoscopic surgeons but with equal effectiveness. Larger series with more rigorous analysis are required before the procedure can be evaluated adequately and recommended for general use.     

SIS graft for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair—a case-controlled study

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect on quality of life and prolapse severity of traditional anterior repair compared to anterior repair with a small intestine submucosa (SIS) graft. This report was designed as a case-control study. The sample of this study consisted of 14 women who underwent traditional anterior repair and 14 women who underwent anterior repair with SIS graft (SG) at a London teaching hospital. All women were assessed preoperatively and at 6 and 24 months postoperatively using a validated prolapse quality of life questionnaire and pelvic organ quantification system (POP-Q). Quality-of-life outcomes included the following: (1) General health perception, (2) Prolapse impact, (3) Role limitations, (4) Physical limitations, (5) Social limitations, (6) Personal relationships, (7) Emotions, (8) Sleep/Energy, and (9) Severity measures. The pelvic organ quantification measurement measured nine specific points relating to the anterior and posterior wall of the vagina, vaginal apex, genital hiatus (GH) and perineal body (PB). At 6-month follow-up, the SG repair group showed significant improvement in all quality-of-life parameters measured. In comparison to traditional repair, it was significantly better in improving role limitations, physical limitations and emotions. Both operations significantly improved prolapse quality-of-life severity measures. SG repair improved all POP-Q measurements significantly, except total vaginal length (TVL), whereas traditional repair improved some measurements (AA, midline point of anterior vaginal wall 3 cm proximal to the external urethral meatus; BA, most distal dependant position of the anterior vaginal wall from the vaginal vault or anterior fornix to AA; C, most distal/dependant edge of cervix or vault; AP, point on midline posterior vaginal wall 3 cm proximal to hymenal ring; BP, most distal/dependant point on the posterior vaginal wall from vault or posterior fornix to AP) but not others (location of posterior fornix (D), TVL, GH and PB). At 2-year follow-up, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of quality-of-life outcomes or prolapse severity measurements. Surgery for vaginal prolapse results in marked improvement in quality of life and prolapse severity. The greater improvement seen initially in the SG anterior group was not seen at 2-year follow-up.     

Dyspareunia and chronic pelvic pain after polypropylene mesh augmentation for transvaginal repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse

Synthetic mesh augmentations for pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries are increasing in usage and popularity. Many studies are focusing on the anatomical success rates of transvaginal anterior compartment repairs with synthetic mesh, with minimal attention on its postoperative complications. We present a case report on a 59-year-old postmenopausal woman who underwent an anterior repair with 6×4-cm polypropylene mesh. Postoperatively, she developed severe dyspareunia and debilitating chronic pelvic pain. The patient failed conservative medical therapy and now requests complete removal of the synthetic mesh. No financial support or corporate sponsorship was obtained for this project.     

The risk of urinary stress incontinence after anterior repair

Several reports have dealt with urinary stress incontinence in women who also have genitourinary prolapse. The problem of stress incontinence as a complication after anterior repair in previously continent women, has received little attention. This paper is a review of the problem of urinary stress incontinence after treatment for genitourinary prolapse. Most studies based on objective criteria for continence show an occurrence of approximately 20% of stress incontinence following an otherwise successful anterior repair. Various theories for the mechanism responsible have been suggested. Most authors agree, however, that the lack of elevation of the bladder neck and/or a too tight repositioning of the bladder is responsible for the development of incontinence following anterior repair. A preoperative barrier test seems useful in selecting patients who require an additional bladder neck suspension.     

Adjuvant materials in anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications

The objective of this study is to assess the objective recurrence and complications of adjuvant materials in the treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. The inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using adjuvant materials versus standard surgery for anterior vaginal wall prolapse. The main outcome measures were objective recurrence and complications. Ten RCTs (1,087 patients) were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis showed a lower risk of objective recurrence after 1 year in the patients having an anterior repair with a biological adjuvant material (odds ratio 0.56; 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.92) and absorbable synthetic adjuvant material (odds ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.21–0.89). The evidence for the use of biological adjuvant materials in anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery shows trends towards reduction of objective recurrence at 12 months.     

Anterior compartment prolapse repair with a hybrid biosynthetic mesh implant technique

The aim of the present study is to assess the safety and feasibility of a new technique for cystocele repair using a hybrid biosynthetic graft fixed by the transobturator approach. This is a retrospective study of 13 women diagnosed with symptomatic anterior compartment prolapse that were in stages II and IV, using Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification score and treated between 2003 and 2006. The surgical procedure was carried out through a vaginal approach, exposing the arcus tendineus and the posterior surface of the obturator foramen from the ischial spine to the inferior pubic ramus bone. The patients were followed-up after 3, 6 and 12 months. The anatomical cure rate was 85% (stage 0), although two patients had a recurrence 8 months after surgery. All patients would repeat the procedure, if necessary. No de novo dyspareunia was observed in these small series. The results suggest that this technique is safe and feasible and is a comprehensive surgical approach for anterior compartment prolapse, without postoperative morbidity.     

Techniques of rectocele repair and their effects on bowel function

Gynecologists have traditionally evaluated rectocele repair by its effect on vaginal function; coloproctologists have traditionally evaluated its effect on bowel function. Hence different operative criteria and surgical techniques have arisen, but with very little prospective, objective evaluation. The purpose of this review is to describe the surgical techniques used to repair the rectocele and the most common investigations used during its evaluation. Anorectal investigations identify concomitant pathology, may explain pathophysiology, provide objective outcome criteria and attempt to predict the patients that will most benefit from surgery. However, because of the complex neuromuscular, physiological and mechanical interactions that contribute to impaired rectal emptying, their usefulness in improving functional outcome has been limited. Many patients experience improvement, but still are left with some symptoms of impaired defecation despite anatomic correction.     

Anatomical outcome and quality of life following posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair using collagen xenograft

The aim of this study was to evaluate quality of life, sexual function, and anatomical outcome after posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair using a collagen xenograft. Thirty-three patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months follow-up (FU). Quality of life and sexual function were assessed using a self-reported questionnaire. Prolapse staging was performed using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ). Preoperatively 3 patients had stage I, 26 patients stage II, and 4 patients stage III prolapse of the posterior vaginal wall. Prolapse of the posterior vaginal wall stage II was observed in 7 patients (21%) at the 6-month FU and in 13 patients (39%) at the 12-month FU. Mean point Bp was reduced from –1.1 preoperatively to –2.5 at 6 months FU (p<0.01) and –1.8 at 12 months FU (p<0.01). Previous abdominal surgery was associated with a less favorable anatomical outcome (odds ratio: 2.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.5–3.8). There were no significant changes in sexual function or dyspareunia during the 1-year FU. Preoperatively 76% of the patients reported a negative impact on quality of life as a result of genital prolapse. There was a significant improvement in several variables associated with quality of life at 6 and 12 months FU. Posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair using a collagen xenograft was associated with an unsatisfying anatomical outcome at 1-year FU although several quality of life-associated variables affecting psychosocial function were improved. Improvement was not restricted to postoperative restoration of vaginal topography, and previous surgery had a negative effect on anatomical outcome.     

Meniscus repair with simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Clinical outcomes,failure rates and subsequent processing

PurposeTo retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes of meniscus repair with simultaneous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and explore the causes of failure of meniscus repair.MethodsFrom May 2013 to July 2018, the clinical data of 165 patients who were treated with meniscus surgery and simultaneous ACL reconstruction, including 69 cases of meniscus repair (repair group) and 96 cases of partial meniscectomy (partial meniscectomy group) were retrospectively analyzed. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) ACL rupture associated with fracture, collateral ligament injury, or complex ligament injury; (2) a history of knee surgery; or (3) a significant degree of osteoarthritis. The 69 patients in the repair group were divided into the non-failure group (62 cases) and the failure group (7 cases) depending on the repair effect. Postoperative outcomes of the repair group and the partial meniscectomy group were compared. General conditions and postoperative outcomes of the failure group and the non-failure group were compared. During the median follow-up period of 28 months (range, 4 - 65 months) after the second arthroscopy, postoperative outcomes of seven patients in the failure group were summarized. SPSS 25.0 statistical software was used for statistical analysis. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsSeven patients in the failure group who underwent the second arthroscopy were followed up for (30 ± 17.4) months and their postoperative outcomes were summarized. Compared with the partial meniscectomy group, the International Knee Documentation Committee scores of patients in the repair group improved significantly (p = 0.031). Compared with the non-failure group, more patients in the failure group were younger than 24 years (p = 0.030). The median follow-up period was 39.5 months. All patients recovered well after subsequent partial meniscectomy and relieved clinical symptoms. Visual analog scale scores decreased significantly (p = 0.026), and the International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores improved significantly (p = 0.046 for both).ConclusionThe failure rate of meniscus repair in this study was 10.1% (7/69), all of which were medial meniscus tears. However, the surgical outcomes of ACL reconstruction were not affected, and there might be a role for graft protection. Therefore, meniscus retears can be successful treated by performing subsequent partial meniscectomy in patients with repair failure.     

Anatomic and Functional Outcome of Vaginal Paravaginal Repair in the Correction of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse

Over a 2-year period 45 patients with bilateral paravaginal support defects underwent vaginal paravaginal repair. Postoperative evaluations were conducted and anatomic outcome was determined by vaginal examination, with grading of vaginal wall support. Functional outcome was assessed by a standardized quality of life questionnaire, voiding dairy and standing stress test with a full bladder. Thirty-five patients had long-term follow-up with a mean of 1.6 years (range 1–85). The recurrence rates for displacement cystocele, enterocele and rectocele were 3% (1/35), 20% (7/35) and 14% (5/35), respectively. In no patients did vault prolapse develop or recur. Subjective or objective evidence of persistent stress urinary incontinence was found in 57% of patients (12/21). Vaginal paravaginal repair is a safe and effective technique for the surgical correction of anterior vaginal wall prolapse but has limited applicability in the surgical correction of genuine stress incontinence.     

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair: preliminary results and instrumented testing for anterior stability

The authors present their preliminary results of arthroscopic primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament tears performed on five patients, with a mean follow-up time of 9.2 months. All patients were re-evaluated by subjective questionnaire and clinical examination, and tested for anterior drawer at 20 degrees flexion using the KT-1000 Knee Ligament Arthrometer and the UCLA Instrumented Clinical Knee Testing Apparatus. Subjectively, four patients were rated as fair and one as good. The Lachman test was negative in two and trace or mildly positive in three patients. Pivot shift test was negative in all. Instrumented testing demonstrated three patients with increased anterior laxities outside the normal range, and two of these patients also showed reduced anterior stiffnesses which were beyond the normal range. Based on these results, the authors question the feasibility of arthroscopic repair of anterior cruciate ligament tears and suggest a more objective evaluation of this procedure.     

Long-term functional outcomes of all-inside arthroscopic repair of anterior talofibular ligament avulsion fracture

BackgroundThe main purpose of this study was to describe the all-inside arthroscopic technique for repairing anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) avulsion fractures at the attachment points of the fibula and talus, and to evaluate the functional outcomes during long-term follow-up.MethodsThe data of 78 patients with ATFL avulsion fracture treated in our hospital from August 2013 to November 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients underwent surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had undergone all-inside arthroscopic treatment or open treatment. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Karlsson Ankle Functional Score (KAFS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and a 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) were used to evaluate functional outcomes.ResultsThe postoperative follow-up period was 24–48 months. All patients reported subjective improvements to ankle stability without any nerve, blood vessel or tendon complications. At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference in the AOFAS, SF-36 or sport participation rate between the arthroscopic group and the open group; however, the KAFS and FAOS were significantly higher in the arthroscopic group than in the open group.ConclusionsFor ATFL avulsion fractures, the all-inside ankle arthroscopic procedure produced better outcomes than did the open procedure. The all-inside ankle arthroscopic procedure provides a minimally invasive technique with acceptable long-term functional outcomes.     

Do overactive bladder symptoms improve after repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse?

This study aims to evaluate the changes of overactive bladder symptoms to anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair. Ninety-three consecutive women with symptomatic anterior vaginal wall prolapse ≥ stage II and coexistent overactive bladder symptoms were prospectively studied using a urinalysis, urodynamics, King’s Health Questionnaire (KHQ), Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QOL) questionnaire and pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system before and 1 year after surgery. All women underwent a standard fascial anterior repair. Postoperatively, urinary frequency, urgency and urge incontinence disappeared in 60, 70 and 82% of women respectively (p value < 0.001). The vaginal examination findings as well as the quality of life of the women assessed using KHQ and P-QOL significantly improved after surgery (p value < 0.001). This study has demonstrated that anterior vaginal repair does produce significant improvement in overactive bladder symptoms. A larger longer-term study is required to assess if these changes persist over time.     

Comparison of outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for posterior, anterior and bileaflet prolapse

Objective: We sought to compare the outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve (MV) surgery for anterior (anterior mitral leaflet, AML), posterior (posterior mitral leaflet, PML) or bileaflet (BL) MV prolapse. Methods: Between August 1999 and December 2007, 1230 patients who presented with isolated AML (n = 156, 12.7%), isolated PML (n = 672, 54.6%) or BL (n = 402, 32.7%) MV prolapse underwent minimally invasive MV surgery. The preoperative mitral regurgitation (MR) grade was 3.3 ± 0.8, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 62 ± 12% and mean age was 58.9 ± 13.0 years; 836 patients (68.0%) were male. Mean follow-up time was 2.7 ± 2.1 years, and the follow-up was 100% complete. Results: Overall, the MV repair rate was 94.0% (1156 patients). Seventy-four patients (6.0%) received MV replacement. MV repair for PML prolapse was accomplished in 651 patients (96.9%), for AML in 142 patients (91%) and for BL in 363 patients (90.3%). Repair techniques consisted predominantly of leaflet resection and/or implantation of neochordae, combined with ring annuloplasty. Concomitant procedures were tricuspid valve surgery (n = 56), atrial fibrillation ablation (n = 286) and closure of an atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale (PFO) (n = 89). The overall duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was 127 ± 40 min and aortic cross-clamp time was 78 ± 33 min. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 11.6 ± 9.7 days for the overall group. Early echocardiographic follow-up revealed excellent valve function in the vast majority of patients, regardless of the repair technique, with a mean MR grade of 0.3 ± 0.5. For the overall group, 5-year survival rate was 87.3% (95% CI: 83.9–90.1) and 5-year freedom from cardiac reoperation rate was 95.6% (95% CI: 94.1–96.7). The log-rank test revealed no significant difference between the three groups regarding long-term survival or freedom from reoperation. Conclusions: Minimally invasive MV repair can be achieved with excellent results. Long-term outcomes and reoperation rates for AML prolapse are not significantly different from PML or BL prolapse.     

Anterior vaginal wall length and degree of anterior compartment prolapse seen on dynamic MRI

The objective of the study was to determine the relationship between midsagittal vaginal wall geometric parameters and the degree of anterior vaginal prolapse. We have previously presented data indicating that about half of anterior wall descent can be explained by the degree of apical descent present (Summers et al., Am J Obstet Gynecol, 194:1438–1443, 2006). This led us to examine whether other midsagittal vaginal geometric parameters are associated with anterior wall descent. Magnetic resonance (MR) scans of 145 women from the prior study were suitable for analysis after eight were excluded because of inadequate visibility of the anterior vaginal wall. Subjects had been selected from a study of pelvic organ prolapse that included women with and without prolapse. All patients underwent supine dynamic MR scans in the midsagittal plane. Anterior vaginal wall length, location of distal vaginal wall point, and the area under the midsagittal profile of the anterior vaginal wall were measured during maximal Valsalva. A linear regression model was used to examine how much of the variance in cystocele size could be explained by these vaginal parameters. When both apical descent and vaginal length were considered in the linear regression model, 77% (R ² = 0.77, p < 0.001) of the variation in anterior wall descent was explained. Distal vaginal point and a measure anterior wall shape, the area under the profile of the anterior vaginal wall, added little to the model. Increasing vaginal length was positively correlated with greater degrees of anterior vaginal prolapse during maximal Valsalva (R ² = 0.30, p < 0.01) determining 30% of the variation in anterior wall decent. Greater degrees of anterior vaginal prolapse are associated with a longer vaginal wall. Linear regression modeling suggests that 77% of anterior wall descent can be explained by apical descent and midsagittal anterior vaginal wall length.     

阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术对子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出患者术后疼痛及复发的影响

目的探讨阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术对子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出患者术后疼痛及复发的影响。 方法选取2017年1月到2019年1月,安徽省马鞍山市中心医院收治的90例子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出患者。采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组。对照组45例采用单纯阴道前后壁修补术进行治疗,观察组45例采用阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术进行治疗,2组术后随访1年。比较2组治疗后的临床疗效及手术前后视觉模拟评分（VAS）;统计2组围手术期手术相关指标及并发症发生率和随访1年的复发率。采用SPSS 21.0统计软件进行数据分析。 结果观察组总有效率为93.33%,显著高于对照组的71.11%,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。与手术前相比,术后3～7 d,2组VAS评分均呈逐渐降低趋势,且术后3、7 d观察组显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。与对照组相比,观察组术中出血量明显较少,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组的住院时间、肛门排气时间、手术时间等明显较短,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。观察组并发症发生率、随访1年复发率分别为6.67%、2.22%,显著低于对照组的26.67%、24.44%,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出,可显著改善患者围手术期相关指标的情况,减轻患者术后疼痛,并能降低患者并发症发生率及术后复发率,临床疗效显著。