Axillary dissection for breast carcinoma. The myth of skip metastasis

The question of what constitutes an adequate axillary dissection for breast cancer remains open for debate. Central to this controversy is whether axillary nodal metastasis occurs in a stepwise fashion or spreads sporadically, creating skip metastases. The therapeutic aim of axillary dissection also must be considered. To resolve this controversy, a prospective study involving 129 patients who underwent complete axillary dissection for breast carcinoma was performed. The tissue from the axillary dissections was divided intraoperatively and sent to the pathologist as two specimens. The first specimen contained all nodes lateral to the pectoralis minor muscle (Level I), whereas the second contained all nodes beneath and medial to the pectoralis minor (Levels II and III). The tissue was analyzed to determine the frequency of skip metastasis. Only two patients, 1.6 per cent of the total group or 3.2 per cent of the positive node group, were found to have a positive node in Level II-III with no metastasis in Level I. A thorough dissection of Level I alone is sufficient to detect more than 98 per cent of all axillary lymph node metastases from breast cancer. Thus, proper staging of the disease can be obtained. When Level I contained positive nodes, the probability of metastatic disease to higher levels was significant (45%), indicating further treatment is necessary in incomplete axillary dissections.     

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy more accurate than axillary dissection for staging nodal involvement in breast cancer patients?

Today evaluation of axillary involvement can be routinely performed with the technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). One of the greatest advantages of SLNB is the nearly total absence of local postoperative complications. It is important to understand whether SLNB is better than axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) for staging axillary nodal involvement. The aim of the study was to evaluate the axillary staging accuracy comparing three different methods: axillary dissection, sentinel node biopsy with the traditional 4-6 sections and sentinel node biopsy with complete analysis of the lymph node. 527 consecutive patients (525 females and 2 males) with invasive breast cancer < or = 3 cm and clinically negative axillary nodes were divided into 3 different groups: group A treated with axillary dissection, group B treated with sentinel nodal biopsy analysed with 4-6 sections, and group C treated with sentinel node biopsy with analysis of the entire node. All patients underwent a quadrantectomy to treat the tumor. Group differences and statistical significance were assessed by ANOVA. The percentages of N+ in group A and group B were 25.80% and 28% respectively, while in the third group it rose to 45%, or almost half the patients. The differences among the three groups were statistically significant (p = 0.02). From our analysis of the data it emerges that axillary dissection and sentinel node biopsy with analysis of 4-6 sections have the same accuracy in staging the nodal status of the axilla; analysis of the entire sentinel lymph node revealed an increased number of patients with axillary nodal involvement, proving more powerful in predicting nodal stage. SLNB with complete examination of the SLN removed can be considered the best method for axillary staging in breast cancer patients with clinical negative nodes. In our study, the percentage of metastases encountered after complete examination of SLN was 45% compared to the accuracy of axillary dissection that was only 25.8%. Moreover, this approach avoids the useless axillary cleaning in about 55-60% of cases, decreasing postoperative morbidity and mortality.     

Multicentre study of ultrasonographically guided axillary node biopsy in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection is still performed as a staging procedure since lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in patients with breast cancer. Sentinel node biopsy may replace routine axillary lymphadenectomy, especially in patients with small breast cancers. This study investigated whether ultrasonographically guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the axillary lymph nodes in clinically node-negative patients was an accurate staging procedure to select patients for sentinel node biopsy. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-five consecutive patients were included. All had axillary ultrasonography and detected nodes were categorized according to their dimensions and echo patterns. Ultrasonographically guided FNAC was carried out if technically possible. These results were compared with the results of the sentinel node biopsy and subsequent axillary dissection. RESULTS: In 116 patients no lymph nodes were detected by ultrasonographic imaging. Of 69 patients with visible nodes, 31 had malignant cells on FNAC. There were no false-positive results. Some 87 of 185 patients had axillary metastases on definitive histological examination. Ultrasonography was sensitive in patients with extensive nodal involvement. Failure of the examination was caused by problems learning the method, difficulty in puncturing small lymph nodes and sampling error. CONCLUSION: In patients without palpable axillary nodes, a sentinel node biopsy could be avoided in 17 per cent since ultrasonography combined with FNAC had already diagnosed axillary metastases. The method is particularly valuable in larger breast cancers.     

Lymphatic tumor burden negatively impacts the ability to detect the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the preferred method of nodal breast cancer staging. Techniques of SLN biopsy rely on transport of interstitial molecules through mammary lymphatics. Lymphatic flow may be disrupted by tumor emboli. Increased lymphatic tumor burden may be responsible for failure to identify the sentinel lymph node in patients with breast cancer. A prospective database of 110 patients who had SLN biopsy between January 2001 and December 2002 was analyzed. The number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes was used as a measure of lymphatic tumor burden. SLN was found in 94 per cent of cases. It was not found in seven patients; five of them had extensive axillary metastases (71%) compared to 23 per cent when SLN was found (P = 0.001). The average number of metastatic lymph nodes was larger when SLN was not found compared to when SLN was found (12.8 vs. 3.9, respectively, P = 0.002). Increasing numbers of metastatic nodes correlated with decreasing success in SLN biopsy (P = 0.075). The incidence of axillary metastases is higher in patients in whom the sentinel node is not found. High lymphatic tumor burden may have a causative role in SLN biopsy technical failure. Axillary dissection should be performed if SLN is not found, regardless of the tumor size or histology.     

Removal of two sentinel nodes accurately stages the axilla in breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Assessment of lymph node status in breast cancer is still necessary for staging. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) may provide accurate staging with less morbidity than axillary clearance. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the number of sentinel nodes removed on the false-negative rate. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from 395 women undergoing SNB for breast cancer, between June 1995 and December 2001. All nodes that were hot and/or blue were removed and analysed. RESULTS: During this interval 136 patients who had SNB were lymph node positive. The median number of sentinel nodes removed was two (range one to five). The overall false-negative rate of SNB in these women was 7.1 per cent. If only one sentinel node had been removed, the false-negative rate would have been 16.5 per cent. The removal of more than two nodes had no effect on axillary staging in all but two women. CONCLUSION: In early breast cancer, when there were multiple sentinel nodes, removal of two sentinel nodes significantly reduced the false-negative rate compared with removal of one node. Removing more than two sentinel nodes did not significantly reduce the false-negative rate further.     

Preceding Sentinel Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: Does it Affect the Number of Axillary Lymph Nodes ?

In the staging of early breast cancer a positive sentinel node biopsy is followed by axillary dissection in order to assess the number of metastasised lymph nodes. Immediate axillary dissection has been abandoned in our centre. If necessary, an axillary dissection takes place about two weeks later, but the post surgical inflammatory reaction might hinder dissection and decrease the number of removed lymph nodes. In a retrospective study, the total number of lymph nodes removed by sentinel node biopsy followed later by axillary dissection (n = 53) was compared with the total number of lymph nodes removed by axillary dissection without previous sentinel node biopsy in combination with breast conserving therapy (n = 113), or following breast conserving therapy (n = 15), or in combination with mastectomy (n = 65). A total number of 12 (median) lymph nodes were removed by sentinel node biopsy followed later by axillary dissection. Only in the mastectomy + axillary dissection group were less lymph nodes (median of 9) removed (P = 0.009). Multiple regression showed the total number of axillary lymph nodes to be correlated with age (R = -0.21; P = 0.002) and with the number of lymph nodes with metastasis (R = 0.31; P < 0.0001). Age distribution showed that the mastectomy + axillary dissection group had the oldest patient population. The number of removed axillary lymph nodes is not decreased by preceding sentinel node biopsy, but depends on other factors.     

Axillary staging during surgery for breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node status remains the single most important prognostic parameter in patients with breast cancer. In approximately half of operations sentinel lymph node biopsy cannot be employed and axillary dissection is indicated. Retrieval of ten nodes has hitherto been considered sufficient, but it remains questionable whether the removal of more lymph nodes might improve staging. METHODS: Data from 31 679 breast cancer operations in Denmark were analysed. RESULTS: The number of axillary lymph nodes retrieved was an independent and strong predictor of node positivity. The more lymph nodes retrieved, the better the staging of the disease; this was evident for all sizes of tumour. Dissection of 20 or more nodes rather than ten to 14 increased the probability of node positivity from 14.2 to 25.9 per cent for 1-5-mm tumours, from 38.6 to 47.9 per cent for 11-20-mm tumours, and from 80.6 to 90.0 per cent for tumours with diameter greater than 50 mm. CONCLUSION: The number of metastatic lymph nodes increased as more nodes were retrieved. These findings underline the need for high-quality specialist surgical and pathological services in breast cancer treatment.     

Axillary lymph node status of T1 primary breast cancer in a diverse population

The utility of level I and II axillary lymph node dissection in women with primary tumors less than 1 cm in diameter has recently received extensive evaluation. Numerous patients undergo axillary lymph node dissection ultimately to discover no pathological involvement. This study investigates the lymph node status in T1 primary breast adenocarcinoma in our diverse patient population. A retrospective evaluation of patients treated at the Medical Center of Louisiana at New Orleans and the Tulane University Medical Center with breast adenocarcinoma less than or equal to 2 cm was performed. Demographic data and pathological reports were reviewed to obtain breast lesion size and lymph node status. One hundred sixteen patients were found to have T1 lesions. Ethnic distribution was African American 66 per cent; Caucasians 30 per cent; Hispanic 2 per cent; and Asian 3 per cent. Whereas no patients with T1a lesions had positive lymph nodes, 11 per cent of patients with T1b lesions and 36 per cent of patients with T1c lesions had positive lymph nodes. However, in our patient population no patients with tumors less than 1.0 cm. in diameter had positive lymph nodes. Although this may be due to our relatively small sample size axillary lymph node dissection may be unnecessary in this select patient population. For patients with lesions 1.0 cm and greater an axillary lymph node dissection seems to add necessary information for correct treatment in a small percentage of patients. The use of lymphatic mapping with sentinel axillary lymph node biopsy may reduce the number of unnecessary axillary dissections in early breast cancer.     

Axillary recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely performed as an axillary staging procedure for breast cancer. Although the reported false-negative rate approaches 10 per cent, this does not always lead to axillary recurrence. We previously reported an axillary recurrence rate of 1 per cent at a median follow-up of 2 years. Our objective is to determine the rate of axillary recurrence with longer follow-up. A retrospective review of patients with invasive breast cancer and a negative SLNB treated between 2001 and 2005 was performed. Cases where neoadjuvant therapy was used or where isolated tumor cells (ITCs) were found were included, whereas those with fewer than 18 months of follow-up were excluded. One (0.7%) out of 139 patients had an axillary recurrence after a median follow-up of 52 months. No patient who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or with ITCs had axillary recurrence. Twelve (8.6%) patients have died, with death attributed to breast cancer in three. Our study demonstrates that axillary recurrence after SLNB remains a rare event after a median follow-up of 52 months, despite including potentially higher risk scenarios such as where neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used and ITCs are found. Therefore, axillary lymph node dissection can safely be avoided in patients where SLNB is negative.     

Non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel nodes

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been shown to be relatively accurate in axillary nodal staging in breast cancer. In more than half of the patients with metastatic sentinel lymph node (SLN), the SLN was the only lymph node involved in the axilla. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for those female Chinese breast cancer patients who underwent SLNB. All patients had axillary dissection after SLNB. Those patients with metastatic SLN were selected for analysis. Various tumour factors and SLN factors were analysed to study the association with residual lymph node metastasis. Results: A total of 139 SLNB was performed. The success rate of SLN localization, false negative rate and accuracy were 92%, 9% and 95%, respectively. Fifty-five patients had metastases in the SLN. In 38 patients (69%), SLN was the only lymph node involved in the axilla. Tumours <3 cm, a single metastatic SLN, presence of micro metastases and the absence of extracapsular spread in the SLN were associated with the absence of metastasis in the non-sentinel lymph nodes. Conclusion: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate in the nodal staging of Chinese breast cancer patients. Several factors such as tumour <3 cm, a single metastatic SLN, micro metastases and the absence of extracapsular spread in the sentinel node(s) are useful predictors for the absence of residual disease in the axilla. With further studies and verification, these factors may prove to be important in determining which patients with metastatic SLN will require further axillary treatment. Until such information is available, axillary dissection should be performed when positive sentinel nodes are found.     

The role of nodal staging in breast cancer. Past, present and future

The axillary nodal status is accepted as the most powerful prognostic tool available for early stage breast cancer. In the past radical removal of level I and level II lymph nodes at axillary node dissection (ALND) has been the most accurate method to assess nodal status, and it is the universal standard; however, it is associated with several adverse long-term sequelae. New diagnostic technologies have helped to individualize diagnostic evaluation and therapy of breast cancer thus improving efficacy and minimizing morbidity of treatment. Lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymph node biopsy has emerged as an effective and safe alternative to the ALND for detecting axillary metastases. Many issues such as indications or technique of performing sentinel node biopsy have been evaluated. Multiple studies now confirm that sentinel lymphadenectomy accurately stages the axilla and is associated with less morbidity than axillary dissection. Blue dye, radiocolloid, or both can be used to identify the sentinel node, and several injection techniques may be used successfully. Sentinel node biopsy is now minimally invasive, highly accurate method of axillary staging, and has replaced routine axillary lymph node dissection as the new standard of care in breast cancer. New technologies for axillary nodal staging include innovative imaging techniques such as single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) and modern histopathologic evaluation of sentinel nodes using molecular biologic approaches.     

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The authors report the feasibility and accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymphadenectomy in patients with breast cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer generally is accepted for its staging and prognostic value, but the extent of dissection remains controversial. Blind lymph node sampling or level I dissection may miss some nodal metastases, but ALND may result in lymphedema. In melanoma, intraoperative lymph node mapping with sentinel lymphadenectomy is an effective and minimally invasive alternative to ALND for identifying nodes containing metastases. METHODS: One hundred seventy-four mapping procedures were performed using a vital dye injected at the primary breast cancer site. Axillary lymphatics were identified and followed to the first ("sentinel") node, which was selectively excised before ALND. RESULTS: Sentinel nodes were identified in 114 of 174 (65.5%) procedures and accurately predicted axillary nodal status in 109 of 114 (95.6%) cases. There was a definite learning curve, and all false-negative sentinel nodes occurred in the first part of the study; sentinel nodes identified in the last 87 procedures were 100% predictive. In 16 of 42 (38.0%) clinically negative/pathologically positive axillae, the sentinel node was the only tumor-involved lymph node identified. The anatomic location of the sentinel node was examined in the 54 most recent procedures; ten cases had only level II nodal metastases that could have been missed by sampling or low (level I) axillary dissection. CONCLUSIONS: This experience indicates that intraoperative lymphatic mapping can accurately identify the sentinel node--i.e., the axillary lymph node most likely to contain breast cancer metastases--in some patients. The technique could enhance staging accuracy and, with further refinements and experience, might alter the role of ALND.     

Surgical axilla dissection. Technical standard or obsolete method?

Axillary lymph node status remains the single most important prognostic parameter and has crucial therapeutic implications in patients with breast carcinoma. Surgical dissection of the axilla is commonly regarded as the standard procedure of axillary staging, its sensitivity and specificity being 99% and 100%, respectively. Apart from giving reliable information on the individual prognosis axillary dissection also contributes to efficient local tumor control in the axilla, as it reduces the risk of local recurrence to less than 1.4% if more than 10 lymph nodes are removed. Alternative, less or non-invasive axillary staging methods have either not yet been sufficiently standardized (immunoscintigraphy, PET-scan, prediction of axillary lymph node status by means of individual risk factors) or are associated with a considerable risk of false-negative staging (up to 50% of patients with positive axillary lymph nodes are not detected by palpation alone, ultrasonography or CT-scan). The basic principles of axillary sampling and axilloscopic dissection are questionable because the number of lymph nodes removed during these procedures is commonly less than 10. With its sensitivity/specificity being comparable to that of standard axillary dissection sentinel lymph node biopsy represents a highly promising approach which will in the future potentially lead to significant optimization of the clinical management of patients with breast cancer, especially those diagnosed in early stages (T1 a, T1 b and T1 c).     

Clinicopathologic analysis of sentinel lymph node mapping in early breast cancer

Axillary nodal status is the most significant prognosticator for predicting survival and guiding adjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) represents a minimally invasive procedure with low morbidity for staging axillary nodal status. In this article we review and report our experiences in patients with early breast cancer who underwent SLNB at the Revlon/UCLA Breast Center. Between September 1998 and May 2000, a total 83 SLNBs were performed in 81 patients with proven breast cancer and negative axillary examination who elected to have SLNB as the first step of nodal staging. Two patients had bilateral breast cancer. SLNB was localized by using both 99Tc sulfur colloid (83 cases) and isosulfan blue dye (75 cases). Data of these patients were prospectively collected and analyzed. The clinical and pathologic characteristics of women with positive and negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were compared to identify features predictive of SLN metastasis. Of the 83 cases, the SLN was successfully localized in 82 (98.8%). Sixty-three percent of patients had SLNs found in level I only, 18.3% in both level I and II, and 4.9% in level II alone. The vast majority (84.3%) of these cases had T1 breast cancer with an average size of 1.55 cm for the entire series. Twenty-three patients (28%) had positive SLNs, with an average of 1.5 positive SLNs per patient. Fifteen had metastases detected by hematoxylin and eosin staining and 8 had micrometastases detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using anticytokeratin antibodies. Ten of the former group agreed to and 2 of the latter group opted for full axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). An average of 17.5 lymph nodes were removed from each ALND procedure. Additional metastases or micrometastases were found in seven patients (in a total of 28 lymph nodes). Three patients with completely negative SLNs experienced additional axillary lymph node removal due to their election of free flap reconstruction. None had metastases detected in these lymph nodes. The absence of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR) by IHC (p = 0.036) and the presence of lymphatic/vascular invasion (LVI) (p = 0.002) predicted positive SLNs in patients with early breast cancer in a univariate analysis; in a multivariate analysis only LVI was predictive (p = 0.0125). Histologic type, nuclear grade, tumor differentiation, HER-2/neu and p53 status, S-phase fraction, and DNA ploidy did not predict SLN status. Immediate postoperative complications were uncommon and delayed complications completely absent. Because of the high detection rate, accurate staging, and minimal morbidity, SLNB should be offered as a choice to women with small breast cancers and clinically negative nodes. Because positive LVI and negative ER/PR status are highly predictive of pathologically positive SLNs in small breast cancers, women whose cancers meet these criteria should be advised preoperatively about their risk of having a positive SLN and may benefit from intraoperative assessment (frozen section and/or touch preparation) of their SLNs.     

Radiation after mastectomy in high-risk patients: is it necessary?

A retrospective review of cases from 1988 through 1992 was performed examining high-risk breast cancer patients treated with modified radical mastectomy without postoperative radiation at a single institution. Locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, overall survival, and number of lymph nodes removed were examined. This was compared with recent Danish and Canadian studies. Thirty-three premenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients had a 9 per cent locoregional recurrence rate. In the Danish and Canadian studies the locoregional recurrence rates were 32 and 21 per cent. These were reduced to 9 per cent and 10 per cent respectively in the radiated arms. Our locoregional recurrence in nonradiated patients was similar to that in the radiated arms of the studies and improved when compared with recurrence in their non-radiated controls. The adequacy of the axillary lymph node dissection was examined. In the current study a median of 18 lymph nodes were recovered with only 3 per cent containing less than 12 nodes. In the Danish study a median of seven lymph nodes were removed. Similarly in the Canadian trial a median of 11 nodes were removed. With complete axillary dissection results equivalent to those of postoperative adjuvant radiation is achieved. Further randomized controlled studies with standard axillary dissections are needed before the recommendation of routine postoperative radiotherapy.     

Multiple sectioning and immunohistochemical staining of sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether focused analysis of sentinel nodes is more useful than routine haematoxylin and eosin examination of axillary lymph nodes obtained by axillary lymph node dissection. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-two patients with breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes underwent successful sentinel node biopsy using a combination of dye and radioisotope, followed immediately by standard level I and II axillary lymph node dissection. Multiple sectioning, with haematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical analysis of sentinel nodes using cytokeratin antibody, was compared with single section and haematoxylin and eosin analysis of sentinel and non-sentinel nodes (routine examination). RESULTS: A mean of 1.9 (range 1-12) sentinel nodes and 11.2 (range 4-24) non-sentinel nodes were excised per patient. Metastases were detected in 44 patients (29 per cent) by single section and haematoxylin and eosin analysis of sentinel and non-sentinel nodes. An additional five patients (3 per cent) with metastases were detected by multiple sectioning and haematoxylin and eosin analysis of sentinel nodes. A further 20 patients (13 per cent) with metastases were identified by multiple sectioning and immunohistochemical analysis of sentinel nodes. Both haematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical analysis of sentinel nodes missed one patient with node metastases, which led to a false-negative rate of 1 per cent. CONCLUSION: Multiple sectioning and immunohistochemical staining of sentinel nodes identified 16 per cent more patients with positive axillary lymph nodes than routine haematoxylin and eosin examination.     

Selective sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer in the United States

Lymph node status is the most reliable prognostic indicator for breast cancer patients. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are the first draining lymph nodes for metastatic breast cancer to spread from the primary site. Although the therapeutic role of selective sentinel lymphadenectomy (SSL) in breast cancer has not been determined, the practical significance is that it is being used as a staging procedure, so that a negative SLN can spare a patient more extensive axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with its associated morbidity. If the SLN is negative, the negative predictive value of the remaining nodal basin for breast cancer exceeds 95%. SSL selects out one or a few SLNs and permits more extensive study of the nodes by the pathologist. Such extensive examination would not be practical for the many nodes yielded by a standard ALND. SSL is rapidly evolving into a standard approach for staging primary breast cancer in the United States, without the maturation of results from clinical trials.     

Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the breast predicts axillary nodal status

We hypothesize that the diminishing role of axillary node dissection (ALND) in early stage breast cancer could be further reduced in patients with advanced disease depending on the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC). We reviewed records of patients managed with NC and recorded demographics, tumor characteristics, pre/postoperative axillary nodal status, and NC response. We define a response to NC as follows: T2 tumors at least a 50 per cent reduction in the product of the length and width of the tumor and in T3-4 tumors a reduction in tumor size to less than 2 cm. We defined a negative axillary nodal status as either a negative sentinel node biopsy before or after NC or a negative ALND. We defined a positive axillary nodal status as clinical persistence of nodal disease despite NC or involved nodes determined by ALND. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the association between response to NC and nodal status. Over the past 4 years, 35 patients have completed NC and surgical treatment including lymph node assessment. Sixteen cancers demonstrated a response to NC and two (12.5%) had positive lymph nodes. Nineteen cancers failed to respond to NC and 13 (68.4%) had involved lymph nodes. Fisher's exact test shows a strong association between NC response and nodal status (two-tailed P value 0.0016). Patients with advanced locoregional breast cancer that respond to NC are unlikely to benefit from ALND. If this study's findings are confirmed in larger trials, ALND could be limited to patients with advanced locoregional breast cancer unresponsive to NC.     

Cost/Accuracy Ratio Analysis in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology,Sentinel Node Biopsy,and Frozen Section of Node

We evaluated the effectiveness and the cost of axillary staging in breast cancer patients by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (US-FNAC), sentinel node biopsy (SNB), and frozen sections of the sentinel node to achieve the target of the highest number of immediate axillary dissections. From January 2003 through October 2005, a total of 404 consecutive eligible breast cancer patients underwent US-FNAC of suspicious axillary lymph nodes. If tumor cells were found, immediate axillary dissection was proposed (33% of node-positive cases). If US or cytology was negative, SNB was performed. Frozen sections of the sentinel node allowed immediate axillary dissection in 31% of node-positive cases. The remaining 36% underwent delayed axillary dissection. We compared our policy with clinical evaluation of the axilla, showing better specificity of US-FNAC, the cost balanced by a 12% reduction of SNBs, and a marked reduction of unnecessary axillary dissections resulting from false-positive clinical staging. Moreover, the comparison between our policy and permanent histology of the sentinel node showed an 8% cost saving, mainly associated with the immediate axillary dissections. US-FNAC of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients reliably predicts the presence of metastases and therefore refers a significant number of patients to the appropriate surgical treatment, avoiding an SNB. As cost saving to the health care system in our study is mainly related to one-step axillary surgery, US-FNAC of axillary lymph nodes and frozen section of the sentinel node generate significant cost saving for patients who have metastatic nodes.