光固化型和化学固化型玻璃离子水门汀与牙釉质间的抗剪粘结强度

测定两种光固化型玻璃离子水门汀（ＬＧＩＣ）和两种化学固化型玻璃离子水门汀（ＧＩＣ）与新鲜离休牛前牙釉质问的抗剪粘结强度，结果显示：不论对釉质面酸蚀与否，ＬＧＩｃ与釉质面的粘结强度均比ＧＩＣ高，且相差极显著（Ｐ＜０．０１）；酸处理釉质面后，不论ＬＧＩＣ还是ＧＩＣ，其与酸蚀釉质面间的粘结强度都会提高，相差极显著（Ｐ＜０．０１）。     

Shear bond strengths of two resin-modified glass ionomer cements to porcelain.

Shear bond strength of a composite resin adhesive (Concise) and two resin-modified glass ionomer cements (Fuji Ortho LC and Geristore) bonded to porcelain surface was tested. Orthodontic brackets were bonded to 120 porcelain disks (Finesse) etched with 9% HF. Samples were divided into six groups: (1) Concise, (2) Concise/silane, (3) Geristore, (4) Geristore/silane, (5) Fuji, (6) Fuji/silane. No statistical difference in mean shear bond strength was found between silanated Concise (15.8 MPa), Geristore (19.4 MPa), and Fuji (18.5 MPa) groups, which were significantly higher than nonsilanated groups. Porcelain fracture was observed in all silanated groups and nonsilanated Geristore group. We conclude that (1) silane increases bond strength to porcelain significantly for composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer cement, (2) Concise, Geristore, and Fuji Ortho LC provide comparable shear bond strength to porcelain.     

不同剂型玻璃离子水门汀对牙本质粘结剪切强度的比较

目的:比较不同剂型玻璃离子水门汀对牙本质粘结剪切强度,为临床使用提供参考。方法:临床收集新鲜拔除的磨牙30个,用慢速精密齿科片切机切取颊面浅层牙本质薄片(片厚2 mm),自凝塑料包埋,仅暴露颊侧浅层面作为粘结面,流水冲洗4 s,无油气体吹干,于每个试件的粘结面上固定一直径4 mm,高2 mm成型管。然后将30个试件随机分为3组(每组10个),分别使用RelyXTM Luting Cement(粉液剂型)、GC Fuji PLUS(粉液剂型)和GC Fuji CEM(双糊剂型)3种玻璃离子水门汀进行充填,制作粘结试件后,试件置于盛有人工唾液的容器中37℃24 h,用万能测试机测定每个试件的粘结剪切强度。结果:3种玻璃离子水门汀的粘结剪切强度由底到高分别为:RelyXTM Luting Cement(粉液剂型)(6.163±1.177)MPa、GC Fuji PLUS(粉液剂型)(8.004±0.962)MPa、GC Fuji CEM(双糊剂型)(10.31±0.893)MPa,三者间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:双糊剂型玻璃离子水门汀抗粘结剪切强度明显高于两种粉液剂型玻璃离子水门汀,是临床修复治疗的良好选择。     

Effect of region and dentin perfusion on bond strengths of resin-modified glass ionomer cements

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that regional differences and pulpal pressure would significantly affect bond strengths of resin-modified glass ionomer cements to dentin. METHODS: Twenty-six extracted caries-free human third molars were ground to expose middle dentin and were randomly divided into two groups for bonding: no pulpal pressure and pulpal pressure of 15cm H(2)O. Fuji II LC, Vitremer, or Photac-Fil Quick were applied to the previously pre-treated surfaces and light-cured as recommended by the manufacturers. After immersion in water at 37 degrees C for 24h, the teeth were sectioned to 0.7mm thick slabs, divided into pulp horn, center, and peripheral regions according to visual criteria, and trimmed along the bonded interface for microtensile bond test to a cross-sectional area of 1mm(2). The slabs were subjected to tensile forces and the data analyzed using ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD at the 95% level of confidence. RESULTS: For Fuji II LC, bond strengths to the pulp horn regions were significantly lower than those to the other regions independent of pulpal pressure (p<0.05). On the other hand, regional bond strengths were not observed for Vitremer and Photac-fil Quick 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pulpal pressure had a stronger influence on bond strengths and failure modes of resin-modified glass ionomers than regional differences of the substrate.     

Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentine using four conditioners

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to measure the microtensile bond strengths of three glass ionomer cements to dentine (Photac-Fil Quick; Fuji II LC; Fuji IX GP) using four different conditioners (Ketac Conditioner; Dentin Conditioner; Cavity Conditioner; and an experimental conditioner, K-930). METHODS: Superficial occlusal dentine of extracted human third molars was exposed, finished with wet 600-grit silicon carbide paper, and each of the above glass ionomer cements bonded using the four conditioners according to the manufacturers' instructions. After 24h in tap water at 37 degrees C, the teeth were sectioned to obtain 3-4 bar-shaped specimens. Ten specimens were prepared for each group and shaped to an hour-glass form of (1.2+/-0.02)mm diameter. The specimens were mounted in a jig and stressed in tension at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min until failure. The mean bond strengths were calculated and compared using one-way ANOVA and LSD tests, and the fracture modes were examined by scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Mean microtensile bond strengths for Photac-Fil Quick were not significantly different from Fuji II LC for each of the conditioners used. However, the bond strengths for Photac-Fil Quick were significantly greater than Fuji II LC when no conditioner was applied. Mean microtensile bond strengths of conditioned specimens of Fuji II LC were significantly greater than non-conditioned specimens. Mean microtensile bond strengths of non-conditioned specimens of Fuji IX GP were not significantly different from conditioned specimens. The fracture mode of all specimens demonstrated mostly cohesive failure within the cement. SIGNIFICANCE: The use of surface conditioners resulted in improvement in bond strength of Fuji II LC, while Photac-Fil Quick and Fuji IX GP showed no difference.     

In vitro study of 24-hour and 30-day shear bond strengths of three resin–glass ionomer cements used to bond orthodontic brackets

Interest in using composite resin–glass ionomer hybrid cements as orthodontic bracket adhesives has grown because of their potential for fluoride release. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare shear bond strengths of three resin–glass ionomer cements (Advance, Fuji Duet, Fuji Ortho LC) used as bracket adhesives with a composite resin 24 hours and 30 days after bonding. The amount of adhesive remaining on the debonded enamel surface was scored for each adhesive. Mesh-backed stainless-steel brackets were bonded to 100 extracted human premolars, which were stored in artificial saliva at 37° C until being tested to failure in a testing machine. The hybrid cements, with one exception, had bond strengths similar to those of the composite resin at 24 hours and 30 days. Fuji Ortho LC had significantly lower bond strengths (ANOVA p ≤ 0.05) than the other adhesives at 24 hours and 30 days when it was bonded to unetched, water-moistened enamel. Adhesive-remnant scores were similar for all cements, except for cement Fuji Ortho LC when it was bonded to unetched enamel. The resin–glass ionomer cements we tested appear to have bond strengths suitable for routine use as orthodontic bracket–bonding adhesives. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:620-24.)     

Shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets cemented to bovine enamel with composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cements

PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the effects of short- and long-term storage on the shear bond strength of metal, polycarbonate, and ceramic orthodontic bracket bases using autopolymerizing resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIC). The glass ionomer cement was applied in both a wet and a dry environment. METHODS: With a method developed in the authors' laboratory, orthodontic brackets were cemented under constant pressure to embedded bovine incisor enamel. All cements were mixed and applied in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The specimens were stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, 7 days, or 180 days. After the lapse of each time interval, they were shear tested to failure. The shear bond strengths (SBSs) were converted to megapascals (MPa). An adhesive remnant index (ARI) was used to record the site of the residual cement. RESULTS: There were no precipitous increases or decreases in SBS over a lapsed time of 180 days, although some variations occurred between 24 hours and 7 days. Similar findings were recorded for ARI. CONCLUSIONS: The bracket base-cement combinations produce clinically sustainable SBSs over time. Selection of the cement may be important in patients who exhibit a high risk for caries.     

Tensile bond strength between glass ionomer cements and composite resins

Etching or roughening the surface of glass ionomer cement before use of composite resins and bond agents produces bond strengths comparable to the bond strength between glass ionomers and dentin. Bond failure at such surfaces occurs within the glass ionomer. Adequate washing with water after acid etching the glass ionomer is essential to obtain optimal bond strength. Apparently, some combinations of ionomer cements and resins are more effective than are others in providing a good bond in the "sandwich technique".     

树脂加强型玻璃离子粘固剂粘结强度的研究

目的 检测树脂加强型玻璃离子粘固剂的粘结强度,探讨影响粘结性能的相关因素.方法 30颗健康离体前磨牙分成两组,分别用京津釉质粘合剂和树脂加强型玻璃离子粘固剂初次、二次粘接托槽,测剪切强度及粘结剂残余指数.结果 树脂加强型玻璃离子粘固荆的粘结强度与临床普遍使用的京津釉质粘合剂的粘结强度相近,差异无显著性(P>O.05).结论 树脂加强型玻璃离子粘固剂可以替代复合树脂粘结剂.能够满足临床需要.     

Pulpal response to two semihydrous glass ionomer luting cements

This study compared the pulpal responses to two innovative semihydrous glass ionomer luting cements (STA and ZIN) with those previously obtained for a conventional anhydrous glass ionomer luting cement, Aquacem. ZIN contained zinc oxide in the formulation. The study was conducted according to the BSI (1989) recommendations for testing restorative materials in vivo. ZIN was associated with minimal pulpal changes and microbial microleakage, and differed little from the control material, Kalzinol. The pulpal response to STA was similar to that observed for Aquacem, but was associated with less microbial microleakage. The statistical model demonstrated a significant association between bacterial presence within the experimental cavity and pulpal inflammation. The closer that bacteria were to the pulp, the more severe was the ensuing inflammation.     

A comparative study of the bond strengths of amalgam and alloy–glass ionomer cores

The purpose of this study was to compare the bond strengths of dental amalgam cores and dental alloy-glass ionomer cores that were luted to cast gold crowns with glass ionomer cement. Seventy-two human extracted molars were sectioned horizontally and four regular thread mate system pins were inserted into a flat pulpal floor. The teeth were restored with amalgam or alloy-glass ionomer admixture and prepared for crown preparations. Castings were produced with type III gold and cemented to the cores with Fuji type I glass ionomer cement. Thirty-six of the specimens were subjected to thermal fatigue by cycling between 4 and 50 degrees C for periods of 1, 5 and 10 weeks. The remainder of the specimens were retained in deionized water at 37 degrees C. Bond strengths of the cores, in tension, were measured with a universal testing machine. The alloy-glass ionomer cores exhibited higher bond strengths than the amalgam cores for virtually all time periods, particularly the thermocycled samples. The alloy-glass ionomer cores exclusively displayed core fractures and pin/tooth insufficiencies while the amalgam cores failed because of a deterioration of the glass ionomer luting cement.     

Leaching from glass ionomer cements

This study compared the electrical conductivities, pH and leached ion (F⁻, Ca, Al, Si) concentrations in supernatant liquids obtained from four glassionomer cements, a buffered ionomer cement, a polycarboxylate cement and a zinc phosphate cement, at three different levels of settings. The result indicated that the measured parameters are highest for the unset condition of cements and decreases as the set condition is approached, except for pH, which shows the opposite trend. Two pulp sensitive glassionomer cements, Chem Bond and Ketac Cem showed high Ca : F ratios as well as high Ca and F concentrations. Further, it is suggested that the cytotoxicity of leached F⁻, Si, Al and Zn at high concentration and at low pH may induce sensitivity in tooth structure.     

An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of three glass ionomer cements

The purpose of this study was to determine the bond strength of three commercially available glass ionomer cements when used to bond mesh-backed medium twin (0.130 inch) brackets to enamel surface. Three different enamel surface conditions, which included use of pumice, pumice and polyacrylic acid, and pumice followed by acidulated phosphate fluoride, were also tested to determine their effect on the bond strength. In addition, bond strength of one composite resin was compared with those of glass ionomer cements. The teeth were bonded with all the materials according to manufacturers' instructions. Each specimen was embedded in Super-Die with the bonded facial surface exposed. A surveyor was used to align the teeth in the stone uniformly for all specimens. A special bracket holder was used to hold the brackets precisely under the wings during debonding. An Instron universal testing machine was used to measure the force required for bond failure. To stimulate oral conditions, the direction of pull was so designed that it included an element of torsional stress along with tensile force. The findings indicate that a large variation existed between the bond strengths of all materials tested. The bond strength of glass ionomer cements was significantly less than that composite resin. However, the bond strength of at least one glass ionomer cement appears to be adequate for clinical use. The different surface preparation before bonding did not significantly affect the bond strengths of glass ionomer cements. Further investigation is required to test the bond strengths of glass ionomer cements clinically.     

Powder-liquid ratio and properties of two restorative glass ionomer cements

Changes in the powder-liquid ratio of glass ionomer cements may affect some of its physical properties and acid erosion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical properties and acid erosion of two conventional restorative glass ionomer cements against ISO 9917-1:2007 standards after changing the powder-liquid ratio to an adequate consistency for luting indirect restorations. The methodology of ISO Specification 9917-1:2007 was applied to the powder-liquid ratio indicated by the manufacturer and to a modified ratio. Two restorative glass ionomer cements, ChemFil (Ch) (Dentsply) and lonofil Plus (IP) (Voco), were used to evaluate film thickness, compressive strength, net setting time and acid erosion. Thickness was measured three times with a digital micrometer (Digimatic Mitutoyo Corporation). Sample size was five for each cement or condition. Compressive strength (Instron 1011, crosshead speed of 1 mm/min) was evaluated after 24 h immersion in water at 37 degreesC. Sample size was five for each cement or condition. Setting time was evaluated for Ch and IP at 37 degreesC. Sample size was three for each cement or condition. Specimen moulds (30 x 30 x 5 mm) with a central perforation of 5 mm in diameter and 2 mm depth were usedfor acid erosion tests. Erosion depth was measured with a micrometer gauge with a precision of 0. 001 mm, before and after 24-hour immersion in a lactic acid-sodium lactate solution with pH 2.74 at 370C. Sample size wasfivefor each condition. Student's t test was performed with a level of significance ofp< O.05 for each material and condition tested. Arithmetic mean (Standard Deviation). Powder-liquid ratio according to manufacturers: film thickness (in pm): Ch 220 (40), IP: 382 (5); compressive strength (in MPa) at 24 hs: Ch 166.3 (16,6), IP: 100 (10); net setting time (in min.) at 370C: Ch 3.44 (0.3), IP: 5.26 (0.1) ; depth of acid erosion (in mm): Ch 0.15 (0.02), IP: 0.17 (0.02). Modified powder-liquid ratio: film thickness (in pm): Ch 23(1), IP:24(1); compressive strength at 24 hs (in MPa): Ch: 69.3 (14.6), IP: 46.5 (7.4); net setting time (in min.) at 370C: Ch 5.72 (0.1) and IP 9.38 (0.1); depth of acid erosion (in mm): Ch 0.22 (0.02). Data were not recorded for IP because the sample disintegrated in the solution. Student's t test was performed for both materials and conditions with a level of significance of p< 0.05. The difference between each condition tested was statistically significant (p<0.01). While changes in the powder-liquid ratio of a restorative glass ionomer cement can result in some of its properties having values that are not far from those required for luting cements according to ISO specifications, it did not meet the requirements for acid erosion.     

Microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer cements to artificially created carious dentin

In this laboratory study, the microtensile bond strengths of a conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) and a resin modified glass ionomer cement (CRMGIC) to artificially created carious dentin and sound dentin were compared, and the ultrastructural morphology of the fractured interface was examined with a low-vacuum scanning electron microscope (SEM). The specimens were divided into 4 groups: 1) a conventional GIC (Ketac-Fil Plus Aplicap) placed on sound dentin; 2) a conventional GIC placed on artificially created carious dentin; 3) an RMGIC (Photac-Fil Aplicap) placed on sound dentin and 4) an RMGIC placed on artificially created carious dentin. Artificial carious lesions were created using a chemical demineralizing solution of 0.1 M/L lactic acid and 0.2% carbopol. GIC buildups were made on the dentin surfaces according to the manufacturer's directions. After storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, the teeth were sectioned vertically into 1 x 1 x 8-mm beams for the microtensile bond strength test. The microtensile bond strength of each specimen was measured, and failure mode was determined using an optical microscope (40x). The fractured surfaces were further examined with SEM. Two-way analysis of variance showed that the mean microtensile bond strengths of a GIC and an RMGIC to carious dentin were significantly lower than those to sound dentin, and the mean microtensile bond strengths of Photac-Fil to both sound and carious dentin were significantly higher than those of Ketac-Fil Plus. Chi-square tests indicated that there was a significant difference in failure mode between the sound dentin and carious dentin groups. In sound dentin groups, cohesive failure in GIC was pre- dominant; whereas, mixed failure was predominant in carious dentin groups. SEM examination showed that the specimens determined to be cohesive failures under light microscopy in the Photac-Fil/Sound Dentin group were actually mixed failures under high magnification of SEM.     

Effect of water on shear strength of glass ionomer cements for luting

This study examined the effect of ambient water on the shear strength of glass ionomer cements for luting. Disk specimens were fabricated from four commercially available glass ionomer cements with different setting modes. At one hour after the start of mixing, the specimens were stored at 37 degrees C for 24 and 168 hours in dry condition or in deionized water. Shear strength was then determined using a punch tool. The shear strengths of both conventional cements were significantly greater for the specimens stored dry as compared to those kept in deionized water (p < 0.05). Conversely, resin-modified cement specimens stored dry had significantly lower strength compared to the specimens kept in deionized water (p < 0.05). This was because the ambient water surrounding the resin-modified glass ionomer cements helped increase the shear strength of the cements under the experimental conditions tested.     

A comparison of shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets

The study measures and compares shear bond strength data obtained from metal, ceramic, and ceramic-filled plastic brackets bonded to human incisor teeth with a heavily filled composite resin. The mean values for groups of different types of brackets were not statistically significant. The site of failure was commonly at the resin/bracket interface except for the ceramic-filled plastic brackets, which frequently showed failure of the bracket itself. One group of ceramic brackets that used no mechanical retention often showed failure to the extent that the bulk of resin remained on the bracket. The findings strongly suggest that ceramic brackets should offer a viable alternative to their metal counterparts because they combine esthetics with a bond strength that is comparable to and as reliable as their metal counterparts.     

Microleakage of capsulated glass ionomer cements

The purpose of this study was to compare marginal leakage in Class V preparations restored and finished within 20 minutes with two different capsulated and syringeable restorative glass ionomer cements. The materials were inserted and finished following manufacturer's specifications. Specimens were thermocycled 125x in fuchsin dye at 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C, mounted in acrylic and sectioned faciolingually. Microleakage was observed and rated on a scale of 0 to 3 at both enamel and cervical margins. The results of this study indicate that: 1) both materials exhibit marginal leakage at enamel and cervical margins, 2) no significant difference in microleakage was found between these materials, and 3) enamel margins leaked less than cementum/dentin margins with each material.