Health-Related Quality of Life and Pouch Function in Continent Ileostomy Patients: A 30-Year Perspective

PURPOSE The principal aim of this study was to assess long-term pouch durability and health-related quality of life in an original series of patients operated on with a continent ileostomy.PATIENTS Data from 68 of 88 patients who had a continent ileostomy performed at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 1967 and 1974 were analyzed. Median age at follow-up was 60 (range, 40–89) years and median follow-up was 31 (range, 29–36) years.METHODS Patients were sent a questionnaire on pouch function along with the Short Form-36 Health Survey 2.0. A random age-matched and gender-matched sample was drawn from the Swedish national Short Form-36 Health Survey norm database to compare with the patient group.RESULTS The majority of the patients reported good physical condition and satisfactory pouch function. Patients evacuated the pouch a median of four times every 24 hours. Twelve patients (18 percent) had leakages. Forty-four patients (65 percent) had had at least one postoperative revision to restore continence. Generally minor peristomal skin irritation occurred in seven patients (10 percent). Patients with concurrent complaints (mostly age related) reported poorer health-related quality of life. Nevertheless, 78 percent of the patients rated their overall health as good, very good, or excellent. The patients Short Form-36 Health Survey scores were comparable to reference values.CONCLUSIONS Although revisional operations may be needed to restore continence, continent ileostomy has a good durability. Pouch function was satisfactory and patients satisfaction was high. Health-related quality of life levels were similar to those of the general population.Supported by Göteborg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Anna-Lisa o Bror Björnssons Foundation and FoU (Research and Education), Västra Götaland.     

Functional Outcome and Quality of Life After Repeat Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Complications of Ileoanal Surgery

PURPOSE: Disconnection of an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with repeat ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has been proposed for treatment of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis failure caused by septic or functional complications. We report our experience with repeat ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, and document functional outcome and quality of life. METHODS: Of 101 patients undergoing laparotomy, ileoanal disconnection, and repeat ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, 80 were referred from other institutions. Indications included: chronic anastomotic leak (n = 27), perineal or pouch-vaginal fistula (n = 47), anastomotic stricture (n = 22), dysfunction/long efferent limb of S-pouch (n = 36), and previous ileal pouch-anal anastomosis excision or exclusion (n = 6). In 64 cases a septic indication was observed. Pathologic features of Crohns disease were present in 4 patients preoperatively and 15 more after repeat ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Four patients had clinical features of Crohns disease. RESULTS: Three patients had no ileostomy, and 82 patients had temporary ileostomy closure. Of these, 82 percent have a functioning pouch, with a median follow-up of 32 functioning months. Two were rediverted and 13 had the pouch excised. Five-year pouch survival was 74 percent, higher for ulcerative colitis (79 percent) than Crohns disease (53 percent; P = 0.06). No differences were seen between those having repeat ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for septic or nonseptic indications, or whether using a new or repaired pouch. Patients defecated 6.3 ± 2.8 (mean ± standard deviation) times per day, and 2 ± 1.9 per night. Thirty-five percent of patients never described urgency. Fecal seepage occurred in 50 percent during the day and 69 percent at night. Using the Cleveland Global Quality of Life Score to assess the patients quality of life, health, level of energy, and happiness with surgery (each scored from 0–10), quality of life was 8.2 ± 1.6, and happiness with surgery was 9 ± 2. Ninety-seven percent would undergo repeat ileal pouch-anal anastomosis again, and 99 percent would recommend it to others. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a valid alternative for patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis failure. A controlled septic condition should not preclude salvage surgery. Although pouch failure occurs more frequently than after primary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, patient satisfaction and quality of life are high.     

Continence Alterations After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Do Not Diminish Quality of Life

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare continence after double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and to assess the impact on quality of life using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. METHODS: Fifty-five patients randomly selected from a prospective pelvic pouch database were matched with regard to age and gender with patients who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the same time interval by the same surgeon. Patients were mailed the two questionnaires, which were reviewed by an independent observer. Demographics, duration since surgery, and functional results were recorded. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scores were compared by the analysis of variance method. RESULTS: Fifty-one pelvic pouch and 50 laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients were able to be contacted and completed both of the measuring tools. For the pouch patients, the median number of bowel movements per day was six (range, 2–15), with two patients reporting more than occasional nighttime incontinence. Mean incontinence scores were higher for the pelvic pouch patients than for the laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients (17.8 vs. 10.7; P = 0.03). However, the quality-of-life scores were very similar: lifestyle (3.8 vs. 3.83; P = 0.88), depression/self-perception (3.81 vs. 3.83; P = 0.94), embarrassment (3.76 vs. 3.8; P = 0.84), and behavior/coping (3.57 vs. 3.71; P = 0.5). CONCLUSION: Although continence is clearly altered after pelvic pouch surgery, quality of life is extremely well preserved.     

Female Infertility After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis

PURPOSE: Although ulcerative colitis commonly affects young females, the impact of ulcerative colitis and its treatment on female fertility have not been well studied. The purpose of this survey was to examine the impact of ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on female reproductive ability.METHODS: Demographic, reproductive history, and disease history information were obtained via a questionnaire mailed to females who had pelvic pouch surgery or nonoperative management for ulcerative colitis. Based on age at diagnosis, age at surgery, and marital status, 153 females who had pelvic pouch surgery and 60 females who had nonoperative management for ulcerative colitis were identified for inclusion. Patients were asked if they attempted to become pregnant, when relative to their diagnosis or surgery, and if they were successful. Married or cohabiting females aged 18 to 44 years who failed to become pregnant during 12 months of unprotected intercourse were defined as infertile.RESULTS: The infertility rate was significantly higher in females who had pelvic pouch surgery compared with females managed nonoperatively (59/153 (38.1 percent) vs. 8/60 (13.3 percent), respectively; P < 0.001). There was no difference in female fertility after diagnosis with ulcerative colitis compared with before diagnosis (odds ratio, 0.68; P = 0.23). In contrast, there was a 98 percent reduction in fertility after pelvic pouch surgery compared with before surgery (odds ratio, 0.021; P < 0.0001). By logistic regression, increasing age was the only factor associated with failure to become pregnant after surgery (odds ratio, 1.136 per additional year of age; P = 0.027).CONCLUSIONS: Females with ulcerative colitis who are managed nonoperatively have normal fertility, which suggests that ulcerative colitis and medical therapy do not decrease female reproductive ability. After pelvic pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis, female fertility is significantly decreased and this problem should be discussed routinely with patients considering this procedure.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 21 to 26, 2003.Supported by a grant from the Maternal Research Unit, Sunnybrook and Womens College Health Sciences Centre. Dr. Johnson was supported by the Lew Dunn Scholarship. Dr. Richard was supported by a fellowship from the Crohns and Colitis Foundation of Canada.     

Increased Experience and Surgical Technique Lead to Improved Outcome After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Population-Based Study

Purpose This study was designed to determine whether changes in length of stay and 30-day readmission, reoperation, and excision rates for the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis occurred over time and with changes in surgical technique and hospital volume. Methods Using three population-based administrative databases, data on all ileal pouch-anal anastomoses performed in the province of Ontario between January 1992 and June 1998 were obtained. The effect of age, gender, stage of the procedure, year of surgery, and hospital volume were examined for their effect on length of stay and readmission, reoperation, and excision rates. Results There were 1,285 ileal pouch-anal anastomoses performed in 58 hospitals. There was a significant decrease in length of stay and reoperation and excision rates but a concommitant increase in readmission rate during the study period. Patients younger than aged 40 years had a significantly lower length of stay and excision rate. Patients who had a two-stage procedure had a shorter length of stay, readmission, and reoperative rate compared with those having a three-stage procedure. Hospital volume was a significant predictor of need for reoperation and excision with both low-volume and medium-volume hospitals having significantly higher rates than high-volume hospitals. Conclusions Outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has improved. It is significantly better in patients younger than aged 40 years, having a two-stage procedure, and where surgery is performed at high-volume hospitals. It is likely that both modifications in surgical technique and surgical experience have led to improvements in clinical outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dr. Kennedy was supported by fellowships from the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of Canada and the Medical Research Council of Canada. Presented at the Canadian Surgical Forum, Quebec City, September 6 to 9, 2001, and The Surgical Forum, The American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress, New Orleans, October 7 to 12, 2001. Reprints are not available.     

Laparoscopic-Assisted vs. Open Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: Functional Outcome in a Case-Matched Series

PURPOSE Functional outcomes in laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis have been incompletely studied. More than one-year follow-up has rarely been reported in these patients. This study was designed to assess operative, functional, and quality of life outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis a minimum of one year after. METHODS Thirty-three laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and 33 open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis patients, with a median of 13 months and minimum of 12 months follow-up, were identified from a prospective, laparoscopic database. Functional outcome was prospectively assessed by using a standardized survey. These cohorts were matched by individual patient for year of surgery, age, gender, body mass index, and indication. RESULTS Median age was 27 years (open) and 28 years (laparoscopic). There were 27 females and 6 males in each group. All operations occurred between 1999 and 2001. Median body mass index was 22.3 (open) and 21.7 (laparoscopic) groups. There were no significant differences in diagnosis, use of diversion, and anastomotic technique. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 6 percent of the laparoscopic cases and 12 percent of the open cases. Functional outcome after a minimum of one year revealed equivalent median day and median nocturnal number of stools of six to seven and one to two respectively. Consistency of stool, medication usage, and continence were no different between groups. Daytime and nocturnal incontinence was similar. Quality of life in regard to social, home life, family, travel, sports, recreation, and sex life were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS The function and quality of life outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis seem to be equivalent to our open experience. Laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch-anal anastomosis offers selected patients a safe, feasible, and durable alternative. Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Dallas, Texas, May 8 to 13, 2004.     

A Prospective Evaluation of Sexual Function and Quality of Life After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

Purpose  This study was designed to assess the effect of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on sexual function and quality of life in men and women. Methods  Sexual function of patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from February 2005 to June 2006 was prospectively evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function in men and Female Sexual Function Index in women. Quality of life was assessed using the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire. Preoperative scores were compared with scores at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results  Of 110 patients eligible for inclusion, 59 (53.6 percent) agreed to participate. Male sexual function and erectile function scores remained high 12 months after surgery (mean International Index of Erectile Function score 51.7 preoperative vs. 58.3 at 12 months postoperative; P = not significant (NS)). Abnormal sexual function decreased from 33.3 percent before surgery to 22.7 percent 12 months after surgery (P = NS). Female sexual function improved 12 months after surgery (mean Female Sexual Function Index score 19.2 preoperative vs. 27 at 12 months postoperative; P = 0.031). Abnormal sexual function decreased from 73.1 percent before surgery to 25 percent 12 months after surgery (P = 0.001). Quality of life significantly improved after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in both sexes. Conclusions  In men, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis does not have an adverse effect on sexual function, whereas sexual function in women seems to improve 12 months after surgery. Read at meeting of The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Glasgow, Scotland, July 2 to 5, 2007. Published in abstract form in Colorectal Disease 2007;9(Suppl 1):20.     

Pregnancy,Delivery, and Pouch Function After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the pregnancies, method of delivery, and functional results of females with chronic ulcerative colitis who have an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: A mailed questionnaire was sent to all females with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Information on the pregnancy, method of delivery, and outcome was collected. Those females who had a successful pregnancy and delivery were contacted by telephone to clarify results and determine pouch functional results. Other clinical information was obtained from the Mount Sinai Hospital Inflammatory Bowel Disease database. RESULTS: Thirty-eight subjects had 67 pregnancies. Of these, 29 subjects had 49 deliveries. There were 25 vaginal deliveries and 24 cesarean sections. There were two pouch-related complications during the pregnancies and four pouch-related complications postpartum. All were treated nonoperatively. Stool frequency and day and night incontinence were increased during pregnancy in most subjects, but after delivery, prepregnancy function was restored in 24 (83 percent) of them. Five subjects (17 percent) had some degree of permanent deterioration in pouch function. Of these, three had vaginal deliveries, and two had cesarean sections. Multiple births and birth weight were not found to adversely affect subsequent pouch function. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy is safe in females with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Functional results are altered almost exclusively during the third trimester, but pouch function promptly returns to prepregnancy status in most females. A small proportion of females have long-term disturbances in function, but these are not related to the method of delivery. Thus, the method of delivery should be dictated by obstetric considerations.     

Predictors of Pouchitis after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Retrospective Review

Purpose The primary end point of this study was to determine the risk factors that predict chronic pouchitis in those patients having ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Methods A total of 237 patients with ulcerative colitis and undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis by one surgeon at Oregon Health & Science University from 1993 to 2003 were evaluated. Data were gathered via retrospective chart reviews and by a questionnaire administered by telephone in 2004. Patients were excluded if there was less than one-year follow-up documented in the chart or they could not be contacted by telephone (n = 62), postoperative diagnosis of Crohn’s disease (n = 3), failed ileoanal procedure (n = 1), and one-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 3), leaving 167 patients for evaluation. Patients were defined as having chronic pouchitis (>3 episodes of pouchitis) or no pouchitis (≤ 3 episodes of pouchitis). Potential risk factors included number of operations used to perform ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, fulminant ulcerative colitis with two-stage operation, duration of diverting ileostomy after pouch formation, primary sclerosing cholangitis, other extraintestinal manifestations of ulcerative colitis, preoperative liver function tests, duration of ulcerative colitis, and the occurrence of postoperative complications. Initial univariate analysis was performed on all risk factors. Multivariate analysis was performed on all univariate risk factors with P values < 0.2. Results The prevalence of chronic pouchitis in our population was 46 percent. The following variables were identified during univariate analysis and entered into a multivariate model: preoperative serum albumin (P = 0.07), PSC (P = 0.126), duration of diverting ileostomy (P = 0.111), fulminant ulcerative colitis with two-stage operation, (P = 0.051), the presence of postoperative complications (P = 0.031), and the type of postoperative complications (anastomotic complications, P = 0.013). Patients who did not undergo diverting ileostomy at the time of their ileal pouch-anal anastomosis trended toward a lower likelihood of developing chronic pouchitis (P = 0.06). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with postoperative complications (53 percent, P = 0.042), specifically anastomotic complications, were more likely to develop chronic pouchitis (P = 0.005). Eight percent of patients had primary sclerosing cholangitis and 11 percent of patients had at least one extraintestinal manifestation of ulcerative colitis. Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis were not more likely to develop chronic pouchitis (P = 0.168). Patients with extraintestinal manifestations also were not more likely to develop chronic pouchitis (P = 0.273). Conclusions Chronic pouchitis is a frequent complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. In this study patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis or other extraintestinal manifestations of ulcerative colitis were not more likely to develop chronic pouchitis. Patients with postoperative complications, specifically anastomotic complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, were more likely to develop chronic pouchitis and may benefit from early strategies to prevent pouchitis. Poster presentation at the meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology, Honolulu, Hawaii, October 28 to November 2, 2005.     

Quality of Life After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis and Ileorectal Anastomosis in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

PURPOSE Differences in conventional outcomes such as functional results and the rate of complications have caused a controversy about whether the ileal pouch anal anastomosis or the ileorectal anastomosis is the preferred surgical treatment for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. We therefore sought to ascertain not only the surgical results but also the perceptions of patients about their outcomes. METHODS Between 1981 and 1998, 152 patients at our institution had an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and 32 patients had an ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis. Of these 184 patients, 173 were sent a study-specific quality-of-life questionnaire and the Short Form 36 health survey to determine their health-related quality of life. RESULTS Ninety-four ileal pouch patients and 21 ileorectal patients returned the surveys. No difference was found in early postoperative complications, 5-year probability for complications, or functional results after either procedure. On the Short Form 36 health survey, the ileorectal patients had a lower mental health summary score compared with that of the ileal pouch patients but a similar physical health summary score. The study-specific questionnaire found both groups to have a comparable quality of life. CONCLUSION Because ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has the advantage of removing as much at-risk tissue as possible with similar functional results and better mental health, it may be considered the preferred operation for most patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Presented at the 18th World Congress of Digestive Surgery, Hong Kong, China, December 8 to 11, 2002.     

Reconstructive Surgery for Failed Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

PURPOSE: Salvage procedures for failed ileal pouch-anal anastomoses frequently require total reconstruction with a combined abdominal and perineal approach. The aim of this study was to determine the indications for surgery and the outcomes in this group of patients. METHODS: All patients who underwent combined abdominal and perineal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reconstruction at the Mount Sinai Hospital between 1982 and 2000 were reviewed. Data were collected prospectively in the inflammatory bowel disease database. RESULTS: Sixty-three reconstructive procedures were performed in 57 patients, with a mean age of 33.9 (±10.4) years at the time of reconstruction. There were 14 males. The mean follow-up was 69.1 months. The initial indication for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was ulcerative colitis in 98 percent. The primary indication for reconstruction was pouch-vaginal fistula in 21 patients, long outlet in 14, pelvic sepsis in 14, ileoanal anastomotic stricture in 5, pouch-perineal fistula in 2, and chronic pouchitis in 1. The mean operative time was four hours (±1.1), the average blood loss was 500 mL (±400), and the average length of stay was 10.3 days (±4.6). All patients had a diverting ileostomy. Forty-two (73.6 percent) of the patients have a functioning pouch. Seven (12.3 percent) patients have had their pouch excised. The ileostomy has not yet been closed in 8 (14 percent) patients; 3 of these patients are awaiting closure, whereas the remaining 5 have a permanently defunctioning ileostomy. Eighty-nine percent have ten or fewer bowel movements per day. No patients are incontinent of stool during the day, whereas two patients are incontinent at night. Seventeen percent complain of frequent urgency. Despite this, more than 80 percent rate their physical and psychological health as good to excellent. CONCLUSION: Reconstructive pouch surgery has a high success rate in experienced hands. The functional results in those whose pouch is in use are good.     

Sphincter Defects Are Not Associated With Long-Term Incontinence Following Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

INTRODUCTION Frequent loose stools test the integrity of sphincter function in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The authors hypothesized that women with anal sphincter defects were more likely to experience incontinence episodes than women with intact sphincter muscles following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.METHODS From 1996 to 1998, 42 women with a mean age of 42 (range, 22–63) years were prospectively evaluated by anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound before pouch surgery. Forty women underwent a stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and two underwent a handsewn anastomosis. All patients considered themselves continent of stool before the procedure. A postoperative survey including the Cleveland Clinic Florida scale, Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale was sent to study participants.RESULTS Nineteen women with an obstetrical history had significant sphincter defects associated with significant lower mean resting pressure, mean squeeze pressure, and shorter anal canal length (3 vs. 3.7 cm, P = 0.0007). Thirty-five women (83 percent) responded resulting in a mean follow-up of 62 (range, 49-72) months. Fourteen responders (mean age, 46 years) had sphincter defects but no significant difference was found in Cleveland Clinic Florida scale, Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, or Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale scores when compared with those without defects.CONCLUSION Although almost all women reported episodes of seepage, marked sphincter defects associated with low anal pressures and shorter anal canal length did not affect anal function following pouch surgery. This study supports the findings that continent women with significant sphincter defects on ultrasound evaluation may be considered for restorative proctocolectomy.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 22 to 26, 2003.     

Quality-of-Life Assessment of Patients After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Slow-Transit Constipation With Rectal Inertia

PURPOSE: Severe idiopathic constipation with rectal inertia represents a challenging medical problem that, in extremis, might warrant surgery. We studied a group of patients who have undergone proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for this problem. The purpose was to assess the functional success of this procedure and its impact on the social function of the patients. METHODS: Patients with functional, intractable constipation have one motion or less per week and are laxative-dependent. The indication for surgery was based on failure of long-term medical therapy. The selection criteria were normal colonoscopy, normal anal manometry and pudendal nerve latency test, and abnormal transit study and abnormal videoproctography. The functional outcome after surgery was assessed by anal manometry and stool frequency. Quality of life was analyzed using the Rand health survey 1.0 consisting of a comprehensive questionnaire used preoperatively and postoperatively with emphasis on physical function, role limitation because of functional/emotional problems, social function, pain, and general health. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (14 females) underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis over a seven-year period (1993–1999). The mean age was 41 (range, 25–47) years. All had a temporary defunctioning loop ileostomy fashioned, and there were no anastomotic leaks. Two patients required pouch excision within 18 months because of intractable pelvic pain. The mean stool frequency was eight (range, 3–12) per day at the first follow-up. At the second follow-up, this had improved to five (range, 2–6) per day. The mean resting and squeeze anal pressures preoperatively were 82 cm H2O and 104 mmHg, respectively, and were unchanged after surgery. Significant improvement in lifestyle scores were recorded in the categories of physical function, social function, and pain at the first follow-up and in all categories at the second follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Restorative proctocolectomy is an option in selected patients and leads to progressive improvement in quality of life.     

Sexual Function, Body Image, and Quality of Life after Laparoscopic and Open Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

Purpose This study was designed to compare self-reported sexual function, body image, and quality of life outcomes among ulcerative colitis patients undergoing laparoscopic or open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Methods Between 1978 and 2004, 100 laparoscopic and 189 open operations were performed in patients who were identified from a previously published cohort. Patients were surveyed one year after operation to evaluate sexual function, body image, and quality of life. Results A total of 125 of 289 patients (43 percent) returned completed surveys. There were no significant differences in terms of demographics, complications, or long-term functional outcomes between those who completed the surveys and those who did not. There were no clinical differences in results between laparoscopic and open patients using the three survey instruments. Orgasmic function scores were lower in men who underwent laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (P < 0.05) compared with open ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Overall, sexual function scores were equal to or better than normal values for men but were lower in women. Finally, overall body image and quality of life scores were above the means published for the United States. Conclusions After ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, men and women reported excellent body image and high cosmetic and quality of life scores regardless of operative approach. Female sexual function was more adversely affected after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis than was male sexual function. Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 3 to 7, 2006. Supported by a grant from the Department of Surgery Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota.     

Mental Disorder and Psychologic Distress in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to determine if ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis is a psychologic burden for patients, the frequency of mental disorders, the amount of psychologic distress, and their possible disease-related determinants. These factors were studied in patients with ulcerative colitis after ileal pouch anal anastomosis and were compared with ulcerative colitis patients without ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and the general German population.METHODS A total of 37 patients with ulcerative colitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (age 46.8 ± 11.8 years; 35 percent female) and 62 patients with ulcerative colitis without ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (age 44.4 ± 13.9 years; 37 percent female) completed the following questionnaires: medical and sociodemographic questionnaire of the German Competence Network Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and the German version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Disease activity was measured in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis by the Pouch Disease Activity Index and in patients without ileal pouch-anal anastomosis by the German Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity Index. Psychologic distress was assessed by the subscale scores of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A probable mental disorder was identified if a patient scored 11 or higher in at least one subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.RESULTS The frequency of a probable psychiatric disorder in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (16 percent) and without ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (23 percent) did not differ from that in the general German population (17 percent). Ulcerative colitis patients with or without ileal pouch-anal anastomosis did not differ in the amount of psychologic distress. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis patients had higher levels of anxiety than the general population (P < 0.01). Regression models of disease-related factors predicting mental disorder and psychologic distress showed no significant results.CONCLUSIONS Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis neither increases nor decreases the frequency of mental disorders or the amount of psychologic distress in ulcerative colitis patients.This investigation is part of the Competence Network IBD, sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF D 20.00415).Presented in part at the 25th European Conference on Psychosomatic Research, June 23 to 26, 2004, Berlin, Germany.     

Modified Two-Stage Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: Equivalent Outcomes With Less Resource Utilization

PURPOSE A three-stage operative approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is usually undertaken in patients presenting with severe colitis. Increasingly, however, we have performed a two-stage modified ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (colectomy followed by ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without ileostomy). The present study sought to evaluate the safety, results, cost, and length of hospital stay using this modified approach compared to that of the traditional three-stage ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.METHODS Clinical and financial data were gathered by retrospective review of patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at our institution since 1995. Complications were defined as any event prolonging hospitalization or requiring readmission and were included in the analysis up to six months after final surgery. Functional performance was assessed as of the last clinic visit. Data were compared with Students t-test and chi-squared analysis. Multivariate analysis was also used to assess risk factors.RESULTS A total of 23 patients who underwent the two-stage modified procedure and 31 patients who had the three-stage procedure were identified. The two groups were found to be statistically comparable in terms of patient age, gender, duration of illness, and preoperative hematocrit. Follow-up was shorter in the modified group because of its more recent introduction (9.7 months vs. 30.5 months mean follow-up). Ninety-five percent of patients were on immunosuppressive medication before colectomy, but all were off it before the reconstruction. clinical outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were equivalent in terms of the number of bowel movements, prevalence of fecal incontinence, and the use of hypomotility medications. No patients with the two-stage modified procedure had anastomotic complications requiring stoma creation. One patient in the three-stage group required re-creation of a stoma after stoma closure for perianal complications suggesting Crohns disease. Total hospital cost was significantly less in the modified group: $27,270 vs. $38,184 (P = 0.0119). Length of stay was also shorter in the two-stage modified group although missing absolute statistical significance (21.0 days vs. 26.0 days, P = 0.0882).CONCLUSIONS Interval ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reconstruction without a stoma (two-stage modified procedure) after colectomy is functionally equivalent to the traditional three-stage protocol in terms of clinical outcome. However, it has the advantage of overall lower hospital costs and probably a shorter length of hospital stay.© The American Society of Colon and Rectal SurgeonsPublished online: 28 January 2005.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Dallas, Texas, May 8 to 13, 2004..     

A Technique of Extending Small-Bowel Mesentery for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: Report of a Case

One of the keys to success in proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is obtaining adequate mesenteric length to allow the pouch to reach the anorectum without tension. A multitude of techniques have been described in the literature to gain mesenteric length; however, in most cases these techniques only allow for the correction of a small deficit in the mesenteric length. We encountered a case in which the small-bowel mesentery was severely foreshortened because of a previous small-bowel volvulus just proximal to the loop ileostomy during recovery from the initial stage of his ileal pouch procedure. In this case, the deficit in length required an interposition vein graft to the superior mesenteric artery to facilitate adequate mesenteric length and allow completion of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. We report this technique to add another method of mesenteric lengthening to the armamentarium of surgeons performing ileal pouch-anal anastomoses. This technique should only be used as a last resort. Reprints are not available.     

Pouch-Vaginal Fistula After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: Treatment and Outcomes

PURPOSE Pouch-vaginal fistula is an uncommon but serious complication after ileal pouch anal anastomosis. The management of pouch-vaginal fistulas is challenging and a number of treatment options exist. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes after various procedures for pouch-vaginal fistula performed at our institution.METHODS Patients who were treated for pouch-vaginal fistula at Mount Sinai Hospital were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Demographic, disease history, treatment, and outcomes data were obtained. Treatment success was defined as no recurrence of the fistula with a functioning pouch and no ileostomy.RESULTS Since November 1982, 24 of 619 (3.9 percent) women who had primary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed at Mount Sinai Hospital developed a pouch-vaginal fistula. Five women had ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed at another institution and were referred for management of their pouch-vaginal fistula. Local and/or combined abdominoperineal repairs were performed in 22 of 29 patients. Combined abdominoperineal repairs were associated with a higher success rate than that of local perineal repairs (52.9 vs. 7.9 percent, respectively, at 10 years after repair; p = 0.035). Overall, 50 percent (11/22) of patients who underwent surgical repair of a pouch-vaginal fistula had a successful result with a functioning pouch and no recurrence of the fistula, and 21 percent (6/29) of patients required pouch excision.CONCLUSIONS The management of pouch-vaginal fistula after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is associated with a high recurrence rate. Combined abdominoperineal repair appears to offer better results than those of local procedures.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Dallas, Texas, May 8 to 13, 2004.     

Pregnancy and Delivery Before and After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Immediate and Long-Term Consequences and Outcomes

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate pregnancy, delivery, and functional outcome in females before and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis.METHODS: From a prospective database of 1,454 patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis between 1981 and 1995, a standardized questionnaire was sent to all female patients aged 40 years or younger at the time of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 544).RESULTS: The response rate was 83 percent (450/544) with a mean follow-up after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis of 13 years. A total of 141 females were pregnant after the chronic ulcerative colitis diagnosis, but before ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (236 pregnancies; mean, 1.7) and 87 percent delivered vaginally. A mean of five (range, 1–16) years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, 135 females were pregnant (232 pregnancies; mean, 1.7). Comparison of pregnancy and delivery before and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in the same females (n = 37) showed no difference in birth weight, duration of labor, pregnancy/delivery complications, vaginal delivery rates (59 percent before vs. 54 percent after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis), and unplanned cesarean section (19 vs.14 percent). Planned cesareans occurred only after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and were prompted by obstetrical concerns in only one of eight. Pouch function at first follow-up after delivery (mean, 7 months) was similar to pregravida function. After ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, daytime stool frequency was the same after delivery as pregravida (5.4 vs. 5.4, not significant) but was increased at the time of last follow-up (68 months after delivery; 5.4 vs. 6.4; P < 0.001). The rate of occasional fecal incontinence also was higher (20 percent after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and 21 percent pregravida vs. 36 percent at last follow-up; P = 0.01). No difference in functional outcome was noted compared with females who were never pregnant after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (n = 307). Age and becoming pregnant did not affect the probability of pouch-related complications, such as stricture, pouchitis, and obstruction.CONCLUSIONS: Successful pregnancy and vaginal delivery occur routinely in females with chronic ulcerative colitis before and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The method of delivery should be dictated by obstetrical considerations. Pouch function and the incidence of complications in females with pregnancies seem largely unaffected long-term.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 23 to 27, 2003.     

Sacral Osteomyelitis After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: Report of Four Cases

Purpose This study describes an institutional experience with sacral osteomyelitis after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Methods A total of 2,375 patients underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at the Mayo Clinic between January 1981 and January 2002. In addition, we have served as a tertiary referral base for patients with complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed at other institutions. Review of our ileal pouch-anal anastomosis prospective database and directed search of the central pathology, microbiology, radiology, and surgical records at the Mayo Clinic was performed using these keywords: osteomyelitis, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, inflammatory bowel disease, chronic ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease. Results Two of 2,375 patients (0.08 percent) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed at our institution have had sacral osteomyelitis. In addition, two patients have been referred for continuing care after construction of an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and diagnosis of sacral osteomyelitis at another institution. Two of the four patients maintained normal pouch function after sacral debridement and a period of fecal stream diversion. One patient remains diverted with resolved sacral osteomyelitis after debridement. The last patient died from squamous-cell cancer involving the sacrum. Conclusions Sacral osteomyelitis is a rare and heretofore unreported complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Conservative measures using antibiotics alone proved unsuccessful, and delaying definitive management may have contributed to the degeneration of a chronic sacral abscess into squamous-cell cancer. With more aggressive treatment comprising sacral debridement, long-term antibiotics, and fecal diversion, pouch function can potentially be preserved.