Sensitivity and specificity of pulsed Doppler echocardiography in detection of aortic and mitral regurgitation

In order to assess the value of pulsed Doppler echocardiographyin detection of valvular regurgitation, 63 patients were evaluatedfor aortic and/or mitral regurgitation using pulsed Dopplerechocardiography and selective cineangiography. The Dopplerstudy was considered as positive when a turbulent flow was detectedbelow the aortic valve for aortic insufficiency and behind themitral valve for mitral insufficiency on a graphic display (timeinterval histogram) when technically adequate andor on an audiosignal.These results were compared with standard angiographic evaluationof the regurgitation: pulsed Doppler echocardiography had 94%sensitivity and the specificity rate was very high (87.5%) evenfor mild regurgitation. Thus, Doppler technique is highly specificand sensitive in detection of aortic and mitral regurgitationwhen both audiosignal and time interval histogram are simultaneouslyperformed.     

Doppler techniques in the detection of valvular regurgitation: their value and limitations

To evaluate the clinical value of various Doppler techniques in detecting valvular regurgitation, we compared the sensitivity, timing and duration of regurgitation, and the peak velocity of regurgitant signals among conventional pulsed Doppler, color Doppler, continuous wave Doppler and HPRF Doppler echocardiography. 1. Sensitivity of Doppler techniques in detecting mitral regurgitation: Among fifty patients with mitral regurgitation confirmed by left ventriculography, mitral regurgitation was detected in 48 (96%) using color Doppler and pulsed Doppler echocardiography; in 41 (82%) by HPRF Doppler; and in 37 (74%) by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. In 103 consecutive normal volunteers, mitral regurgitant signals were detected in 46 (45%) by color Doppler, in 39 (38%) by pulsed Doppler, in 16 (16%) by HPRF Doppler, and in 8 (8%) by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. 2. Timing and duration of regurgitant signals: To assess the timing and duration of regurgitant signals, 43 patients with regurgitant signals of short duration during systole or diastole were studied using M-mode color Doppler echocardiography. Using the latter method, regurgitant signals throughout systole and the isovolumic relaxation period could be demonstrated in all but four patients who had regurgitant signals of short duration during systole, but suggesting mitral or tricuspid regurgitation. In all patients with regurgitant signals of short duration during diastole, aortic or pulmonary regurgitant signals throughout diastole could be demonstrated with M-mode color Doppler echocardiography. Thus, this technique is superior to conventional pulsed Doppler echocardiography for detecting accurate timing and duration of valvular regurgitation. 3. Peak velocity of regurgitant flow: To compare the peak velocity of regurgitant flow by continuous wave Doppler and by HPRF Doppler echocardiography, 20 patients with mitral regurgitation and 22 patients with tricuspid regurgitation were examined using the both methods. In patients with severe mitral regurgitation, the peak velocity detected by HPRF Doppler echocardiography correlated well (r = 0.96) with that detected by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. However, in patients with mild mitral regurgitation, the peak velocity detected by HPRF Doppler echocardiography was higher than that detected by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. In patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation, the peak velocity had a close correlation (r = 0.99) with the both techniques. In patients with mild tricuspid regurgitation, the peak velocity was higher by HPRF than by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. In conclusion, color or pulsed Doppler echocardiography should be used for detecting valvular regurgitation. M-mode color Doppler echocardiography is superior to conventional pulsed Doppler echocardiography for detecting timing and duration of valvular regurgitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Doppler echocardiography diagnosis and classification of the degree of aortic valve insufficiency in patients with aortic stenoses and mitral valve diseases

To test the capacity of pulsed Doppler echocardiography in the detection and quantification of aortic regurgitation, 64 consecutive patients with aortic and mitral valve disease were examined clinically and by echocardiography before cardiac catheterization. The severity of aortic regurgitation was determined angiographically (I-IV) and compared with the extent of the regurgitant jet in the left ventricle measured by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. In 15 of 64 patients neither angiography nor pulsed Doppler echocardiography showed aortic regurgitation (specificity 100%). Apart from 3 patients with poor echo quality pulsed Doppler echocardiography correctly detected aortic regurgitation in 46 of 49 patients (sensitivity 94%). Clinical examination (63%) and M-mode echocardiography (63%) were significantly less sensitive than Doppler echocardiography (p less than 0.001). The pulsed Doppler echocardiographic degree of aortic regurgitation correlated strongly with angiography (corrected contingency coefficient 0.91). In patients with severe aortic stenosis (systolic gradient greater than 50 mm Hg) aortic regurgitation I was slightly overestimated by pulsed Doppler echocardiography (p less than 0.003). Differentiation of aortic regurgitation III and IV was not possible. Mitral valve disease did not affect quantification of aortic regurgitation (n = 23).     

Detection of aortic insufficiency by standard echocardiography, pulsed Doppler echocardiography, and auscultation. A comparison of accuracies

To determine the relative sensitivity and specificity of noninvasive methods for detecting aortic insufficiency, we compared the accuracy of auscultation, echocardiography, and pulsed Doppler echocardiography in detecting aortic insufficiency in 106 patients in whom the presence or absence of the lesion was shown by supravalvular aortography. The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of aortic regurgitation was 96% and 96% for pulsed Doppler echocardiography, 73% and 92% for auscultation, 43% and 91% for two-dimensional echocardiography, 46% and 81% for anterior mitral leaflet flutter, and 9% and 96% for ventricular septal flutter, respectively. Auscultation was more sensitive than either M-mode or two-dimensional echocardiography in the diagnosis of aortic insufficiency (p less than 0.01). Pulsed Doppler echocardiography was significantly more sensitive than auscultation (p less than 0.0001) and was positive in 19 patients in whom no murmur was found. Thus, pulsed Doppler echocardiography is the optimal noninvasive marker for aortic insufficiency.     

Pulsed and continuous Doppler in qualitative and quantitative diagnosis of mitral insufficiency

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of pulsed and continuous wave Doppler in mitral regurgitation. One hundred and twenty-one patients (64 women and 57 men aged 13 to 76 years, average 54 years) investigated for mitral regurgitation or ischaemic heart disease underwent left ventricular angiography and continuous wave and pulsed Doppler echocardiography. In addition to clinical examination, they also underwent M mode, 2D echocardiography and phonocardiography. They were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of mitral regurgitation on angiography, chosen as the reference method. Group I comprised 51 patients with angiographic regurgitation, and Group II 70 patients without mitral regurgitation. The sensitivity of the Doppler examination was 98%. Of the 51 patients in Group I there was only one false negative in a patient with doubtful angiographic regurgitation in the context of an endocardial cushion defect. In comparison, the sensitivity of clinical examination and phonocardiography were 74.5% and 80% respectively; 13 cases of mitral regurgitation on angiography and Doppler echocardiography had no auscultatory signs. The specificity of the Doppler examination was 92.8%; 5 of the 70 patients in Group II had unquestionable systolic turbulence in the left atrium and 2D echocardiography showed the possible mechanism of these valvular leaks in 3 cases: 1 bivalvular prolapse, 1 rheumatic valvular thickening and 1 papillary muscle dysfunction. We interpret these 5 cases as being true mitral regurgitation but intermittent or too slight to be visible on angiography. The positive predictive value of systolic turbulence in the left was 90.9% and the negative predictive value was 98.4%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Aortic regurgitation: evaluation by pulsed Doppler echocardiography

Ninety-one consecutive patients with aortic regurgitation, either isolated (23 subjects) or associated with other valvular diseases (68 subjects), were studied with pulsed Doppler echocardiography and subsequent aortography, and the results were compared in order to assess the value of the noninvasive technique for a semiquantitative evaluation of the degree of the aortic regurgitation. Both the noninvasive and invasive estimations were graded on a four-point scale. In the long-axis parasternal view, the outflow tract of the left ventricle was divided in four areas going from the aortic valve to the apex. Echo-Doppler grading (from + 1 to +4) was obtained by assessing the area where the abnormal diastolic flow could still be recorded. In the group as a whole, concordant degrees of the aortic insufficiency were obtained in 73 of 91 patients (r = .93; p less than .001); the degree of the aortic regurgitation was overestimated in 8 cases (9%) and underestimated in 10 cases (11%). Most of the discrepancies between the Doppler and the aortographic evaluation were found in patients with intermediate degree (+2, +3) of aortic regurgitation; the degree of discordance was never more than +1 or -1. Correlation between Doppler and aortography was higher in the subjects with pure aortic regurgitation (r = .94, p less than .001) and lower in the subgroup of the subjects with associated mitral stenosis (r = .87, p less than .001). Two-dimensional pulsed Doppler echocardiography is a simple and little time consuming technique that in selected groups of patients can be relied upon for the semiquantitated evaluation of the degree of aortic regurgitation.     

Shu 508 A (Levovist)-enhanced Doppler echocardiography improves the assessment of valvular heart disease

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether intravenous injection of SHU 508 A improves the diagnostic accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of valvular pathologies. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients with valvular pathology (aortic stenosis, n = 48; aortic regurgitation, n = 20; mitral stenosis, n = 21; and mitral regurgitation, n = 36) and diagnostically insufficient Doppler signal were enrolled in this multicenter study. The severity of valvular pathology was graded on a four-point scale using unenhanced and contrast-enhanced Doppler echocardiography as well as cardiac catheterization. Agreement with cardiac catheterization findings increased from 63% using the unenhanced examination to 73% using the contrast-enhanced Doppler examination. Grading was possible in all patients using SHU 508 A, whereas the unenhanced Doppler examination remained inconclusive in six patients. The weighted kappa coefficient between contrast-enhanced Doppler and cardiac catheterization for all diagnoses was 0.76 as compared to 0.68 between unenhanced Doppler and cardiac catheterization. Agreement was especially improved in aortic stenosis (kappa 0.69 unenhanced vs 0.81 contrast-enhanced) and in aortic regurgitation (kappa 0.45 unenhanced vs 0.75 contrast-enhanced). Patients with mitral stenosis and mitral regurgitation experienced less improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In case of an inconclusive unenhanced Doppler echo study, the administration of a left heart contrast agent should be considered. SHU 508 A is especially useful in improving the severity grading of aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation, while grading of mitral stenosis and mitral regurgitation is less improved.     

Pulsed Doppler in the diagnosis of tricuspid insufficiency

Forty-eight patients underwent M-Mode, 2D and pulsed Doppler echocardiography with systematic apical and subcostal examination of the mitral and tricuspid orifices to determine the value of pulsed Doppler echo in the detection of tricuspid regurgitation. The fourty-eight patients, aged 12 to 69 years, were divided into 2 groups: Group I: 27 patients referred for cardiac catheterisation usually with a view to surgery. The majority of patients had rheumatic valvular, congenital heart disease or cardiomyopathies. All of these patients had phonocardiography, right and left heart catheterisation, right ventricular angiography and measurement od cardiac output. Group II: 21 control patients with no auscultatory, radiological or electrocardiographic changes. This group was studied to determine the specificity of pulsed Doppler examination of the tricuspid valve and the patients only underwent echocardiography. Selective right ventricular angiography was selected as the reference. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of pulsed Doppler echocardiography in the positive diagnosis of tricuspid regurgitation were determined. Its value in quantifying tricuspid regurgitation was also analysed. The sensitivity of pulsed Doppler was 93 p. 100 in this series: all but one case of angiographically proven tricuspid regurgitation were detected by the finding of unequivocal systolic turbulence in the right atrium. The specificity of pulsed Doppler was 91 p. 100. The positive predictive value of systolic turbulence in the right atrium was 81 p. 100. The only reliable criteria for quantifying the regurgitation were the intensity of the acoustic signal and the spatial extension of intraatrial turbulent flow: all patients with turbulent flow propagating as far as the superior wall of the right atrium or the inferior vena cava had angiographically severe tricuspid regurgitation. A comparison with other paraclinical methods of detecting tricuspid regurgitation showed that pulsed Doppler echocardiography is the most sensitive tool at the clinician's disposal for diagnosing this lesion: the sensitivity of auscultation and phonocardiography was 50 p. 100, jugular pulse tracings 54 p. 100, right heart catheterisation 50 p. 100, and pulsed Doppler echocardiography 93 p. 100. Pulsed Doppler echocardiography may even be superior to angiography which has, until now, been the method of reference for diagnosing tricuspid regurgitation.     

Doppler color flow mapping in the evaluation of prosthetic mitral and aortic valve function

Doppler color flow mapping and color-guided conventional Doppler studies were performed on 119 patients with 126 prosthetic valves (mitral alone in 60, aortic alone in 52 and both mitral and aortic in 7 patients) within 2 weeks of the catheterization study or surgery, or both. The mean pressure gradients derived by color-guided continuous wave Doppler ultrasound correlated well with those obtained at catheterization for both the tissue and mechanical mitral and aortic prostheses (r = 0.85 to 0.87). For the effective prosthetic orifice areas, better correlation with catheterization results were obtained with the tissue mitral (r = 0.94) and tissue aortic (r = 0.87) prostheses than with the mechanical mitral (r = 0.79) and mechanical aortic (r = 0.76) prostheses. The maximal width of the color flow signals at their origin from the tissue mitral prostheses also correlated well with the effective prosthetic orifice area at catheterization (r = 0.81). Doppler color flow mapping identified prosthetic valvular regurgitation with a sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 100%, respectively, for the mitral and 92% and 83% for the aortic prostheses. There was complete agreement between the Doppler color flow mapping and angiographic grading of the severity of prosthetic valvular regurgitation in 90% of mitral and 73.5% of the aortic regurgitant prostheses with under- or overestimation by greater than 1 grade in only two cases. Valvular and paravalvular regurgitation was correctly categorized by Doppler color flow mapping in relation to the surgical findings in 94% of the mitral and 80.5% of the aortic prostheses.     

Evaluation of systolic murmurs by Doppler ultrasonography.

Non-invasive continuous and pulsed wave Doppler ultrasonography was performed in 102 consecutive patients with clinically ill defined systolic murmurs to differentiate between flow murmurs, mitral regurgitation, aortic stenosis, and ventricular septal defect, as well as to assess the severity of aortic stenosis. Diagnoses with the Doppler method were based on velocity, direction, and duration of flow signals and were subsequently verified by cardiac catheterisation in all patients. Multiple evaluations were made in 31 patients. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 and 0.77 in mitral regurgitation, 0.9 and 1.0 in aortic stenosis, and 1.0 and 1.0 in ventricular septal defect. In 67 patients the estimation of severity of aortic stenosis using the Doppler technique to calculate aortic pressure gradients from maximum flow velocity was significantly correlated with that determined at catheterisation. It is concluded that Doppler ultrasonography is a highly useful technique for the non-invasive evaluation of clinically ill defined systolic murmurs.     

Evaluation of systolic murmurs by Doppler ultrasonography

Non-invasive continuous and pulsed wave Doppler ultrasonography was performed in 102 consecutive patients with clinically ill defined systolic murmurs to differentiate between flow murmurs, mitral regurgitation, aortic stenosis, and ventricular septal defect, as well as to assess the severity of aortic stenosis. Diagnoses with the Doppler method were based on velocity, direction, and duration of flow signals and were subsequently verified by cardiac catheterisation in all patients. Multiple evaluations were made in 31 patients. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 and 0.77 in mitral regurgitation, 0.9 and 1.0 in aortic stenosis, and 1.0 and 1.0 in ventricular septal defect. In 67 patients the estimation of severity of aortic stenosis using the Doppler technique to calculate aortic pressure gradients from maximum flow velocity was significantly correlated with that determined at catheterisation. It is concluded that Doppler ultrasonography is a highly useful technique for the non-invasive evaluation of clinically ill defined systolic murmurs.     

Intra- and paraprosthetic valve regurgitation. A color Doppler echocardiographic study

We prospectively followed a cohort of 64 patients bearing an aortic or mitral prosthetic valve (mean follow-up 5.2 +/- 3.2 months) in order to evaluate if color-coded two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography (CFD) could provide some major advantages with respect to pulsed (PW) and continuous wave (CW) Doppler in the diagnostic accuracy of detection of intra-, and paraprosthetic leaks. During follow-up 4 cases of pathologic prosthetic regurgitation ensued and were all correctly and easily identified by CFD while one of them was missed both by PW and CW Doppler. Based on our results we conclude that CFD is the best noninvasive tool actually available for the correct identification of prosthetic valvular regurgitation because it can provide useful accessory information difficult to obtain with other echocardiographic techniques.     

Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of valvular regurgitation in patients with mitral valve prolapse: comparison with normal subjects

Pulsed Doppler echocardiography was used to determine prospectively the prevalence of mitral, aortic, tricuspid and pulmonary regurgitation in 80 consecutive patients with mitral valve prolapse and 85 normal subjects with similar age and sex distribution. Mitral valve prolapse was defined by posterior systolic displacement of the mitral valve on M-mode echocardiography of 3 mm or more (40 patients), the presence of one or more mid- or late systolic clicks (61 patients), or both. Mitral regurgitation, detected by pulsed Doppler techniques in 53 patients with prolapse, was holosystolic in 24, early to mid-systolic in 6, late systolic in 15 and both holosystolic and late systolic behind different portions of the valve in 8. Definitive M-mode findings were present in only 27 of the 53 patients, and only 21 had mitral regurgitation audible on physical examination. Tricuspid regurgitation was evident by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in 15 patients (holosystolic in 9, early to mid-systolic in 1, late systolic in 4 and both holosystolic and late systolic in 1); 12 of these 15 patients, including all with an isolated late systolic pattern, had an echocardiographic pattern of tricuspid prolapse, but none had audible tricuspid regurgitation. A Doppler pattern compatible with aortic regurgitation was recorded in seven patients, all without echocardiographic aortic valve prolapse and only two with audible aortic insufficiency. A Doppler shift in the right ventricular outflow tract in diastole, suggestive of pulmonary regurgitation, was recorded in 16 of the 78 patients with an adequate Doppler examination: only 1 of the 16 had audible pulmonary insufficiency. Of the 85 normal subjects without audible regurgitation, pulsed Doppler examination detected mitral regurgitation in 3 subjects (holosystolic in 1 and early to mid-systolic in 2), aortic regurgitation in none, tricuspid regurgitation in 9 (holosystolic alone in 8 and both holosystolic and late systolic in 1) and right ventricular outflow tract turbulence compatible with pulmonary insufficiency in 15. The prevalence of valvular regurgitation, detected by pulsed Doppler echocardiography, is high in patients with mitral valve prolapse. Regurgitation may involve any of the four cardiac valves and is clinically silent in the majority of patients. The prevalence rates of mitral and aortic regurgitation are significantly higher in patients with mitral prolapse than in normal subjects, suggesting that alterations in underlying valve structure in the prolapse syndrome may indeed be responsible for this regurgitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

多普勒超声心动图对原因不明心脏收缩期杂音的诊断价值

目的　探讨多普勒超声心动图技术判定原因不明心脏收缩期杂音性质的价值。方法　选择门诊初诊的原因不明心脏杂音的患者 16 0例 ,年龄 14～ 86 (5 6± 2 4)岁 ,分析比较心内科医师进行临床心脏检查 (无临床病史、心电图及 X线资料参考 )和超声心动图检查判定心脏杂音性质的准确性。结果　超声心动诊断功能性杂音 38例 ,器质性杂音 12 2例 ,以主动脉和二尖瓣复合病变最常见 ;其中主动脉瓣狭窄 (AS) 38例 ,主动脉瓣反流 (AR) 32例 ,二尖瓣反流 (MR) 4 5例 ,三尖瓣反流 (TR) 2 8例 ,二尖瓣脱垂 (MVP) 15例 ,室间隔缺损 (VSD) 12例 ,另外有 19例患者可记录到收缩晚期室内峰值压差。临床心脏检查确定功能性杂音、AS、AR、MR、TR、MVP、VSD及室内峰值压差的敏感性依次为 6 6 %、73%、2 2 %、72 %、6 0 %、5 6 %、98%及 2 1% ,与孤立性瓣膜病变比较 ,复合瓣膜病变时临床诊断的敏感性最差 (P<0 .0 0 1)。有 16例临床及超声心动图心脏检查不符。结论　临床心脏检查确定杂音性质有局限性 ,特别是在一个以上部位瓣膜病变时 ,因此对原因不明的心脏收缩期杂音常规进行超声心动图检查则可明确诊断     

Non-invasive diagnosis and assessment of aortic valve disease and evaluation of aortic prosthesis function using echo pulsed Doppler velocimetry.

Non-invasive recording of aortic blood flow velocity patterns in the ascending aorta and in the arch of the aorta was performed in 12 normal subjects, 38 patients with confirmed aortic valve disease, and 13 patients with aortic prostheses using pulse echo Doppler velocity recordings. In normal subjects, the velocity recordings correlated well with those obtained by other authors using invasive procedures. In patients with aortic valve disease, specific abnormalities of the velocity curves were found to correlate well both with the type of lesion (stenosis or regurgitation) and its severity on a three-point scale. Both sensitivity and specificity were found to range between 80 and 94 per cent. A less accurate grading of severity was obtained from patients with aortic regurgitation by the detection of turbulence in the left ventricular outflow tract than from the appearance of the aortic velocity curves. In the studies of patients with aortic prostheses, anomalies of the velocity pattern could be found in the ascending aorta in 53 per cent but no abnormalities of timing was found. In spite of some technical limitations, pulse echo Doppler velocity recordings provide a new non-invasive, reliable, and reproducible approach in assessing the presence and severity of aortic lesions and demonstrating flow abnormalities produced by prostheses.     

Serial assessment of mitral regurgitation by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty

Mitral regurgitation was serially assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography in 144 patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty for symptomatic aortic stenosis. Regurgitant scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 were assigned to pulsed Doppler patterns corresponding to no, mild, moderate and severe mitral regurgitation, respectively. Before balloon aortic valvuloplasty, mitral regurgitant score correlated significantly (p less than 0.005) but weakly with aortic valve area (r = -0.24), left ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.34) and left ventricular systolic pressure (r = 0.23). There was no significant correlation between mitral regurgitation and either mean catheterization or mean Doppler aortic valve gradient. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty produced significant decreases in both catheterization and Doppler mean transvalvular aortic valve gradients (56 +/- 19 to 31 +/- 12 and 60 +/- 19 to 48 +/- 16 mm Hg, respectively; both p less than 0.0001) and a significant increase (p less than 0.0001) in aortic valve area assessed by catheterization (0.6 +/- 0.2 to 0.9 +/- 0.3 cm2). Left ventricular ejection fraction did not change, but cardiac output increased (p less than 0.001) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased (p less than 0.0001). Pulsed Doppler findings of mitral regurgitation were present in 102 of the 144 patients. Eighty-eight patients had a score compatible with mild or more severe degrees of mitral regurgitation, and 49 had a score indicative of moderate or severe valvular insufficiency. In the entire group of 144 patients, mitral regurgitant score decreased significantly from 1.1 +/- 1.0 to 1.0 +/- 1.0 (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Chronology of maximal surface area and peak velocities of left heart valve flow jets using Doppler imaging. Clinical implications

The aim of this study was to correlate the timing of the maximal surface area of the jet recorded by color flow Doppler and the peak velocities recorded by continuous mode Doppler with reference to the ECG R wave to determine whether standardisation of the chronologies of measurements was possible. A comparative paired study of these two parameters was undertaken in 44 subjects who had 55 left heart valvular lesions, all in sinus rhythm and, in cases of regurgitation, with pansystolic or pandiastolic regurgitant flow. The jets were examined in the inflow chambers of valvular insufficiency and at the origin of the jet in the short axis for stenotic lesions and aortic regurgitation, with planimetry of the cross sectional area in color Doppler. The correlation coefficient was 0.85 for aortic stenosis, 0.96 for mitral stenosis, 0.84 for aortic regurgitation but only 0.10 for mitral regurgitation. The mean values of the two chronologies were identical for stenotic lesions and did not differ significantly in regurgitation even at the mitral valve. However, the individual differences between the two chronologies exceeded 20 ms in 63% of aortic and 91% of mitral regurgitations. The maximal surface areas of the jets of 45% of aortic regurgitant and 91% of mitral regurgitant lesions were recorded between the onset of regurgitation and the peak jet velocity. The differences in chronology of the two parameters studied in cases of valvular regurgitation indicate the multifactorial nature of color flow jet imaging, probably associated with individual physiopathological variations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pulsed Doppler patterns of left atrial flow in mitral regurgitation

A prospective pulsed Doppler study of 55 patients was undertaken to detect and quantitate mitral regurgitation. Systolic left atrial flow dispersion indicated mitral regurgitation. Doppler study was feasible in nearly 95% of patients. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy were 89%, 84% and 88%, respectively. Three methods were used to quantitate mitral regurgitation: (1) maximal depth level of systolic left atrial flow, (2) left atrial flow patterns immediately behind the mitral valve closure line (I, protosystolic; II, gradual decrease in intensity of left atrial flow signal throughout systole; and III, broad flow dispersion occupying all systole); and (3) a score system that combined these 2 methods. Results showed that flow patterns behind the mitral valve closure line correlate with angiographic assessment of mitral regurgitation. This provided the simplest and most practical method of determining the severity of mitral regurgitation.     

Clinical evaluation versus Doppler echocardiography in the quantitative assessment of valvular heart disease

We tested the hypotheses that Doppler echocardiography has a higher accuracy than clinical evaluation in the detection of significant aortic and mitral valvular heart disease and that Doppler echocardiography is highly accurate as compared with cardiac catheterization for the assessment of valvular disease severity. Thus, cardiac catheterization for the assessment of valve lesion severity may be unnecessary in selected patients. We prospectively evaluated 75 consecutive patients, ages 20-74 years (mean, 52 years), with clinically suspected valvular heart disease. Specific clinical and Doppler echocardiographic criteria were used to categorize each valve lesion as absent, insignificant, or significant. Criteria for a significant lesion at cardiac catheterization was an aortic or mitral valve area less than 1.1 or 1.5 cm2, respectively, or equal to or greater than 3+ cm2 aortic or mitral regurgitation at angiography. In all valve lesions, Doppler echocardiography had a higher overall accuracy than clinical evaluation. Increases in accuracies of 28%, 19%, 15%, and 7% occurred for mitral stenosis, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and mitral regurgitation, respectively, resulting in overall accuracies of 97%, 100%, 95%, and 96%. Clinical evaluation alone made 28 errors (37% of patients and 19% of valve lesions assessed), and 17 of these errors (23% of patients and 12% of valve lesions) would have resulted in inappropriate management. In only four (24%) of these 17 patients, the attending cardiologist would not have proceeded to assess the valve at cardiac catheterization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prevalence and diagnostic value of precordial murmurs for valvular regurgitation in obese patients treated with dexfenfluramine

Echocardiography is recommended for the detection of valvular regurgitation in asymptomatic users of anorexigens with a heart murmur. To determine the prevalence and diagnostic value of heart murmurs for valvular regurgitation, 223 patients receiving dexfenfluramine therapy for 6.9 months and 189 matched controls underwent history and cardiac auscultation by experienced noncardiologists unaware of echocardiography. Color Doppler echocardiograms were interpreted by 3 observers unaware of patients' clinical data. The frequency of at least mild regurgitation of any valve and abnormal regurgitation (moderate mitral or tricuspid or mild aortic regurgitation) were determined. Heart murmurs heard in 31 dexfenfluramine users (14%) and in 20 controls (11%) were all systolic and of grade I to II/VI intensity. Mild or worse regurgitation of any valve showed a trend in patients (18% vs 11.6% in controls, odds ratio [OR] 1.66, confidence interval [CI] 0.95 to 2.9, p = 0.08), but abnormal regurgitation (includes Food and Drug Administration grade regurgitation) was more common in patients (9% vs 3% in controls, OR 3.0, CI 1.18 to 7.65, p = 0.02). In dexfenfluramine users, heart murmurs were associated with at least mild or abnormal regurgitation (OR 3.1 and 3.05, 95% CI 1.34 to 7.13 and 1.1 to 8.67; p = 0.008 and 0.036, respectively), had a specificity of 89% and 88%, negative predictive value of 85% and 93%, but sensitivity of 37% and 30%, and positive predictive value of 35% and 19%, respectively. Most valves missed by cardiac auscultation had normal morphology and mild regurgitation. Finally, heart murmurs had better diagnostic value for either type of valvular regurgitation than heart murmurs and clinical variables or clinical variables alone. In summary, in dexfenfluramine users the prevalence of heart murmurs was low and their absence predicted absence of mild or worse regurgitation of any valve or abnormal valvular regurgitation. Therefore, cardiac auscultation should be the screening method of choice for detecting valvular regurgitation in users of anorexigens.