Effectiveness and safety of a prevention‐of‐flare‐progression strategy with pimecrolimus cream 1% in the management of paediatric atopic dermatitis

Objective This study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of a prevention‐of‐flare‐progression strategy with pimecrolimus cream 1% in children and adolescents with atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods A 26‐week multi‐centre, randomized, double‐blind, vehicle‐controlled study was conducted in 521 patients aged 2–17 years, with a history of mild or moderate AD, who were clear/almost clear of disease before randomization to pimecrolimus cream 1% (n = 256) or vehicle cream (n = 265). Twice‐daily treatment with study medication was started at the first signs and/or symptoms of recurring AD. If, despite the application of study medication for at least 3 days, AD worsened (as confirmed by the investigator), treatment with a moderately potent topical corticosteroid (TCS) was allowed in both groups. The primary efficacy end point was the number of days on study without TCS use for a flare. Results The mean number of TCS‐free days was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in the pimecrolimus cream 1% group (160.2 days) than in the control group (137.7 days). On average, patients on pimecrolimus cream 1% experienced 50% fewer flares requiring TCSs (0.84) than patients on vehicle cream (1.68) (P < 0.0001). Patients on pimecrolimus cream 1% also had fewer unscheduled visits (87) than patients on vehicle cream (246). Conclusions In children and adolescents with a history of mild or moderate AD but free/almost free of signs or symptoms of the disease, early treatment of subsequent AD exacerbations with pimecrolimus cream 1% prevented progression to flares requiring TCS, leading to fewer unscheduled visits and reducing corticosteroid exposure.     

Pimecrolimus cream in the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in adults: a six-month study

BACKGROUND: Pimecrolimus cream (Elidel, SDZ ASM 981), a non-steroid inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines, is effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). We assessed whether early treatment of AD signs/symptoms reduces the need for topical corticosteroids. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in the long-term management of adult AD. METHODS: 192 adults with moderate to severe AD were randomised (1:1) for twice daily (b.i.d.) treatment of early signs or symptoms of AD with either pimecrolimus cream 1% or vehicle cream (control group) to prevent progression to flares. Treatment was given as needed for 24 weeks. In the event of flares, a moderately potent corticosteroid (prednicarbate 0.25% cream) was permitted as rescue medication in both groups. The percentage of days on which a topical corticosteroid was used to treat disease flares was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: Corticosteroid medication was used on 14.2% (95% confidence interval, CI: 8.3-21.1) of the days of the 24-week treatment period in the pimecrolimus group and on 37.2% (95% CI: 30.4-44.0) of the days in the control group (p < 0.001). In total, 44.8% (43/96) of patients in the pimecrolimus group did not experience a flare compared with 18.8% (18/96) of patients in the control group. The median time to first flare was 144 days in the pimecrolimus group and 26 days in the control group (p < 0.001). Pimecrolimus treatment was also associated with improvement in signs and symptoms of AD, pruritus, patients' self-assessment and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Pimecrolimus cream 1% b.i.d. is an effective, well-tolerated, long-term treatment for AD in adults, substantially reducing the number of flares compared to a conventional therapy and consequently reducing or eliminating the need for corticosteroid treatment.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in adults with moderate atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND: Pimecrolimus cream 1% is a non-steroid, selective inflammatory cytokine inhibitor indicated for atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1%-based treatment versus conventional therapy in adults with moderate AD. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive pimecrolimus cream 1% (n = 62) or vehicle (n = 68) at the first signs/symptoms of AD, for 24 weeks as required. A moderately potent topical corticosteroid (prednicarbate 0.25% cream) was allowed in both groups to treat flares. RESULTS: Corticosteroids were required on fewer days in the pimecrolimus group, compared with the vehicle group (9.7 vs. 37.8%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, 59.7% of pimecrolimus-treated patients experienced no flares during the study period, compared with 22.1% of vehicle-treated patients (p < 0.001). Pimecrolimus cream 1% was well tolerated throughout the study. CONCLUSION: For adults with moderate AD, pimecrolimus cream 1% is well tolerated, reduces the incidence of flares, reduces/eliminates corticosteroid use, improves long-term disease control and enhances the patients' quality of life.     

Effect of pimecrolimus cream 1% on the long-term course of pediatric atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND: This report investigates the effect of pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel, Novartis pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland), a nonsteroid, cell-selective, cytokine inhibitor on the course of atopic dermatitis (AD), as assessed by changes in body surface involvement and pattern of drug use over time. METHODS: Data from 961 patients in two 1-year double-blind, multicenter, pediatric studies of similar design were analyzed: 250 infants (aged 3-23 months) were randomized 4 : 1 and 711 children (aged 2-17 years) were randomized 2 : 1 to receive pimecrolimus cream 1% or vehicle, respectively. Emollients were used by all patients to alleviate dry skin and, at the first signs or symptoms of AD, pimecrolimus or vehicle was applied twice daily to prevent progression to flares. If flares occurred in either group, moderately potent topical corticosteroids were mandated. RESULTS: Pimecrolimus was applied for 68.4% (infants) and 53.8% (children) of study days, and frequency of use of pimecrolimus decreased over time, reflecting improvement in disease control. The mean total body surface area affected decreased continuously over time. Significantly more patients in the pimecrolimus than control groups were maintained without corticosteroid therapy (infants: 63.7% vs. 34.8%, P < 0.001; children: 57.4% vs. 31.6%, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The need for pimecrolimus therapy decreases over time as the patients' disease improves. Hence, once long-term management of AD with pimecrolimus is established, the burden of disease for both the patient and the caregiver decreases significantly and disease-free periods become more frequent.     

Long-term management of facial atopic eczema with pimecrolimus cream 1% in paediatric patients with mild to moderate disease

Background The aim of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate whether treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) with pimecrolimus cream 1% can decrease the development of flares necessitating the use of a topical corticosteroid on the face and thus reduce the need for use of topical corticosteroids in this sensitive skin area. Patients and methods In a controlled, double‐blind, multicentre study, 140 patients, aged 2 to 17 years, with facial involvement and mild to moderate disease after treatment of the initial flare with prednicarbate 0.25% cream were randomized to an intermittent treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% twice daily or vehicle for 24 weeks. If a flare occurred, defined as an exacerbation (unacceptable severity of itching/scratching or onset of oozing) not controlled by study medication, patients were treated with prednicarbate 0.25% cream instead. Results Patients in the vehicle group needed prednicarbate treatment on the face on 20.7% of the days vs. 11.7% of the study days in the pimecrolimus group (P = 0.0024). Fifty per cent of patients in the pimecrolimus group had no flare on the face during the treatment period compared with 37.5% of patients in the vehicle group (P = 0.012). The median time to first flare in pimecrolimus‐treated patients was twice as long as in patients receiving vehicle (138 vs. 68 days, P = 0.01). Three adverse events (one case of skin burning) suspected to be related to use of the study medication were reported for three patients (3.9%) in the pimecrolimus group. Conclusion Long‐term intermittent treatment of facial AD in children and adolescents with pimecrolimus cream 1% does significantly reduce the need for topical corticosteroids.     

The treatment of facial atopic dermatitis in children who are intolerant of, or dependent on, topical corticosteroids: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

Background  Atopic dermatitis (AD) is most prevalent in areas of reduced skin barrier reserve, like face and neck, especially in children. Treatment with topical corticosteroids (TCS) is limited due to heightened risk of treatment-associated side-effects, thus necessitating alternative AD therapies.
Objectives  The primary study objective was to determine the efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% in children with mild–moderate facial AD dependent on/intolerant of TCS. Secondary objectives included effects on overall Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), head/neck EASI, pruritus severity and time to clearance of facial AD.
Methods  A multicentre, double-blind (DB) study of ≤ 6 weeks, followed by a 6-week, open-label (OL) phase was conducted. Two hundred patients (aged 2–11 years) were randomized 1 : 1 to pimecrolimus cream 1% ( n  =   99) or vehicle ( n  =   101) twice daily until clearance of facial AD or for a maximum of 6 weeks (DB phase). Sixteen patients receiving vehicle were allowed to switch to the OL phase at day 22.
Results  Significantly more pimecrolimus-treated vs. vehicle-treated patients were cleared/almost cleared of facial AD (Investigators' Global Assessment 0/1): 74·5% vs. 51·0%, P  <   0·001 (day 43) [57·1% vs. 36·0%, P  =   0·004 (day 22)]. Median time to clearance was 22·0 vs. 43·0 days (pimecrolimus vs. vehicle, respectively). Statistically significant differences for pimecrolimus vs. vehicle were also seen on head/neck EASI, overall EASI, and head/neck pruritus scores. Adverse events were mainly mild–moderate, occurring with similar frequency in both treatment groups.
Conclusions  In children with facial dermatitis intolerant of/dependent on TCS, pimecrolimus cream 1% effectively controls eczema and pruritus and is well tolerated.     

Addition of topical pimecrolimus to once-daily mid-potent steroid confers no short-term therapeutic benefit in the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis; a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with pimecrolimus cream 1%, a topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCI), and fluticasone propionate cream 0.05% (FP), a mid-potency topical corticosteroid, may have a synergistic effect for treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) because their mechanism of action differs. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of concomitant pimecrolimus twice daily/FP once daily vs. vehicle twice daily/FP once daily in patients with severe AD. METHODS: An exploratory, 2-week, double-blind, randomized, within-patient study was conducted (n = 45). Two target areas of similar severity, size and location were assessed. Assessments included the modified Eczema Area and Severity Index (0-12 scale) (primary variable), localized investigator global assessment (0-4 scale) and Patients' Self-Assessment of Disease Severity (0-4 scale). RESULTS: Data for all variables were similar for the TCI/FP and vehicle/FP treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy observed for treatment of severe AD flares with this TCI/FP combination regimen was equivalent to that of vehicle/FP.     

A randomized controlled trial of pimecrolimus cream 1% in adolescents and adults with head and neck atopic dermatitis and intolerant of, or dependent on, topical corticosteroids

BACKGROUND: There is a need for alternative treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) of the face and neck as long-term use of topical corticosteroids (TCS) is associated with skin atrophy and telangiectasia and some patients develop allergy, intolerance or other side-effects. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in patients with AD of the face and neck who are either dependent on, or intolerant of, TCS. METHODS: A 12-week study comprising a 6-week, double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled phase was conducted, followed by a 6-week, open-label phase. Two hundred patients aged 12 years or over with mild to moderate head and neck AD, intolerant of, or dependent on, TCS were randomized to either pimecrolimus cream or vehicle cream. The primary efficacy criterion was the facial investigator's global assessment score at 6 weeks. Secondary efficacy criteria were head and neck Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), pruritus score and eyelid dermatitis. Facial skin atrophy and telangiectasia were assessed with dermatoscopy. RESULTS: A significantly higher percentage of patients treated with pimecrolimus was cleared or almost cleared of facial AD compared with vehicle (47% vs. 16%, respectively). A statistically significant difference was also seen on head and neck EASI and pruritus score. Significantly more pimecrolimus-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients achieved clearance of eyelid dermatitis (45% vs. 19%, respectively). Among the 77 patients with skin atrophy at baseline, treatment with pimecrolimus was associated with a reversal in skin thinning. Of the 112 patients with telangiectasia at baseline, no statistically significant difference was seen between treatment groups. Adverse events occurred with similar frequency in both groups. CONCLUSION: Pimecrolimus cream 1% is effective in patients with head and neck dermatitis intolerant of, or dependent on, TCS. Reversion of skin atrophy may occur during TCS-free intervals.     

Safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus (ASM 981) cream 1% in the treatment of mild and moderate atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND: The ascomycin derivative pimecrolimus (ASM 981) is a cell-selective cytokine inhibitor, specifically developed for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. OBJECTIVE: When applied topically, pimecrolimus cream 1% has shown promise as a treatment for inflammatory skin conditions, including atopic dermatitis (AD) in children and adults, allergic contact dermatitis, and chronic contact irritant hand dermatitis in adults. METHODS: In two independent 6-week, randomized, multicenter studies of identical design, the efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in children with predominantly moderate AD were compared with vehicle. Pooled data from a total of 403 patients were used in the analysis. The primary efficacy parameter was the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score. Secondary parameters included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and severity of pruritus scores. Subjects were also asked to assess their disease control as uncontrolled, limited, good, or complete. RESULTS: Significant therapeutic benefits relative to vehicle were observed in the pimecrolimus-treated group at the first efficacy assessment, 8 days after initial application of the study medication (eg, relief of pruritus). At each subsequent postbaseline visit, pimecrolimus-treated patients showed significant improvement relative to controls in all efficacy measures. The medication was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Pimecrolimus cream 1% appears to be a safe and effective alternative to currently used therapies for AD.     

Pimecrolimus cream 1%: A new development in nonsteroid topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of a family of inflammatory skin diseases (psoriasis, irritant contact dermatitis, and allergic contact dermatitis). Dermal inflammation and production of proinflammatory cytokines by activated T cells is a prominent and defining characteristic in all of these conditions. Corticosteroids, though effective and potent immunosuppressants, are associated with a number of systemic and local adverse effects. The ascomycin derivative pimecrolimus (formerly ASM 981) is a nonsteroid with topical anti-inflammatory activity. Pimecrolimus cream 1% is minimally absorbed into the circulation; thus, it has a low bioavailability-reducing the risk for systemic adverse effects. The efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% has been well shown in diverse patient populations with inflammatory skin diseases in several well-controlled trials. Significant and rapid amelioration of the signs and symptoms of AD was established in 3 studies lasting 6 weeks each, evaluating 589 pediatric patients. In a 1-year study, pimecrolimus was applied at the first signs and symptoms of eczema to prevent the progression of AD to flares. Flares were prevented in over 50% of patients who used pimecrolimus cream 1%, reducing or completely eliminating the need for topical corticosteroids during a 1-year treatment period. Results in pimecrolimus studies in chronic irritant hand dermatitis and chronic hand dermatitis of mixed causes indicate potential for use in these important diseases, and further study in these indications is warranted.     

Efficacy of pimecrolimus 1% cream in the long term management of atopic hand dermatitis. A double-blind RCT

Background: Efficacy and steroid sparing effects of pimecrolimus 1 % cream in atopic dermatitis have been shown recently, but there is no data on efficacy in long term management of atopic hand dermatitis. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of pimecrolimus 1 % cream as maintenance therapy in patients suffering from atopic hand dermatitis. Patients and Methods: A double‐blind vehicle controlled study in 40 adult patients with atopic hand dermatitis (IGA < 3) comparing the efficacy of twice daily application of pimecrolimus 1 % cream given as maintenance treatment versus vehicle over a 8 week period after clinical response (IGA < 2) to a 1–3 week pre‐treatment with mometasone fuorate 0.1 % was performed. Primary endpoint was the time to relapse (IGA > 3). Results: Thirty‐six out of 40 patients were randomised to receive either pimecrolimus 1 % (P) or vehicle cream (V). The number of patients with stable remission in patients randomised to pimecrolimus (53.8 %) and vehicle (43.8 %) did not achieve statistical significance between the groups (p = 0.41). Subgroup analysis of patients with initially moderate dermatitis (IGA = 3, n = 20) showed a trend towards a better outcome for the pimecrolimus group (stable remission P = 81.8 % versus V = 55.6 %) (p = 0.244). Conclusions: Pimecrolimus 1 % cream twice daily was not superior to vehicle in the sequential maintenance therapy of atopic hand dermatitis, but efficacy in moderate forms should be investigated in further studies.     

StabiEL: Stabilization of skin condition with Elidel – a patients’ satisfaction observational study addressing the treatment,with pimecrolimus cream,of atopic dermatitis pretreated with topical corticosteroid

Background The objective of this 4‐month multicentre observational study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of intermittent long‐term treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) with pimecrolimus cream 1% in the daily practice and to compare it with the preceding topical corticosteroid‐based therapy in retrospective. Patients and methods Overall severity of AD and individual symptoms were assessed in 3200 patients by the physician, whereas acceptance of treatment and satisfaction of patients was investigated using a patient questionnaire. Results The percentage of patients clear or almost clear of symptoms increased from 12% to 82%. Seventy‐four per cent of physician rated the treatment better than the preceding therapy, and 21% noted no difference. Seventy‐seven per cent of the patients asserted that long‐term intermittent treatment with pimecrolimus reduces the frequency of flares as opposed to less than 27% for topical corticosteroids. Patients also felt that pimecrolimus results in a higher improvement in quality of life; 84% stated that pimecrolimus stabilized the skin compared with 27% for topical steroids. Conclusion Intermittent treatment of AD patients with pimecrolimus cream 1% is effective and well tolerated, and results in higher patient satisfaction compared with topical corticosteroids in retrospective.     

Influence of pimecrolimus cream 1% on different morphological signs of eczema in infants with atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND: In the published studies on the efficacy of the topical immunomodulator pimecrolimus, different eczema scores were used, and the impact on morphological key signs of eczema was not analysed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of pimecrolimus cream 1% on different standard eczema scores in infants with atopic dermatitis and to analyse the impact of treatment on the individual morphological key signs of eczema. METHODS: Pimecrolimus cream 1% (n = 129) or double-blind vehicle control (n = 66) was administered for 4 weeks. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigators' Global Assessment (IGA) and Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Index (SCORAD) were determined and were correlated with each other. RESULTS: Following treatment with pimecrolimus, the EASI, IGA and SCORAD were significantly reduced on day 29 as compared with the vehicle group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.002, respectively). There was a close correlation between EASI, IGA and SCORAD. The single parameters of the EASI were already significantly decreased by day 4 in the pimecrolimus group as compared to vehicle (each p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Treatment with pimecrolimus 1% cream leads to a rapid improvement of all morphological signs of eczema. The close correlation of different scores was shown for the first time.     

Improvement in pruritus in children with atopic dermatitis using pimecrolimus cream 1%

The objective of this study was to assess time to onset of pruritus improvement in a pediatric population treated with pimecrolimus cream 1%. This 8-day, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled study randomized 174 children and adolescents (aged 2-17 years) with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) and moderate to severe pruritus to twice-daily applications of pimecrolimus cream 1% or vehicle. There were no significant between-group differences in demographics or baseline disease characteristics. Pruritus was assessed by subjects using a 4-point pruritus severity scale (0-3). The primary efficacy variable was time to a 1 point or more improvement in pruritus score from baseline. The 2 treatment groups were compared using log-rank testing of the time-to-event data. In the per-protocol (PP) population, median times to a 1 point or more improvement in pruritus score were 48 and 72 hours for pimecrolimus and vehicle groups, respectively (P = .038). From day 3 onward, significantly more subjects (P = .023) in the pimecrolimus group versus the vehicle group reported complete pruritus resolution. Pimecrolimus cream 1% improved pruritus within 48 hours in children and adolescents with mild to moderate AD and achieved complete resolution of pruritus in a significantly greater number of subjects in the pimecrolimus group versus the vehicle group by the end of the 7-day treatment period (P = .008).     

Twice-daily versus Once-daily Applications of Pimecrolimus Cream 1% for the Prevention of Disease Relapse in Pediatric Patients with Atopic Dermatitis

Abstract:  The aim of this study is to compare twice-daily and once-daily applications of pimecrolimus cream 1% for prevention of atopic dermatitis relapses in pediatric patients. This multicenter trial enrolled 300 outpatients aged 2 to 17 years, with mild-to-severe atopic dermatitis. The patients were initially treated with twice-daily topical pimecrolimus until complete clearance or for up to 6 weeks (open-label period). Those who achieved a decrease of at least 1 point in the Investigator's Global Assessment score were then randomized to double-blind treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% either twice daily or once daily for up to 16 weeks. Study medication was discontinued during periods of disease remission (Investigator's Global Assessment = 0). The primary efficacy end point of the double-blind phase was disease relapse (worsening requiring topical corticosteroids or additional/alternative therapy and confirmed by Investigator's Global Assessment score ≥ 3 and pruritus score ≥ 2). Of the 300 patients enrolled in the study, 268 were randomized to treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% either twice daily or once daily ( n  = 134 in each group). The relapse rate was lower in the twice-daily dose group (9.9%) than that in the once-daily dose group (14.7%), but analysis of the time to disease relapse, using a Cox proportional model to adjust for confounding variables, did not show a statistically significant difference between treatment arms (hazard ratio: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.31–1.30). Treatment of active atopic dermatitis lesions with pimecrolimus cream 1% twice daily, followed by the once-daily dosing regimen, was sufficient to prevent subsequent atopic dermatitis relapses over 16 weeks in pediatric patients.     

Cost Effectiveness of Management of Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis with 1% Pimecrolimus Cream in Children and Adolescents 2–17 Years of Age

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) has the potential to cause a long-term economic impact on patients, their families, and the healthcare system. Objective: To determine if 1% pimecrolimus cream is cost-effective in treating mild-to-moderate AD in patients 2–17 years of age. Methods: Data on the efficacy of AD management with 1% pimecrolimus cream (Elidel®, Novartis Pharma GmbH, Wehr, Germany) were obtained from a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, multinational, controlled clinical trial comparing pimecrolimus and conventional therapy. Markov modeling was used for the economic model, based on: (i) Investigators Global Assessment scores assessed at each visit during the clinical trial; (ii) estimated costs for medication and physician visits for each level of disease severity; and (iii) utility values for each level of disease severity. The perspective was that of a third-party payer. Results: In 2004 US dollars, the incremental cost-effectiveness of 1% pimecrolimus cream was $US38 231 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with conventional therapy. Sensitivity analyses showed a range of $US27 299 to $US63 457 per QALY gained. Conclusion: With an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of <$US50 000 per QALY gained, 1% pimecrolimus cream offers a cost-effective therapeutic option in the management of AD.     

Use of pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel) in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants and children: the effects of ethnic origin and baseline disease severity on treatment outcome

BACKGROUND: Pimecrolimus cream 1%, a cell-selective inhibitor of inflammatory cytokines, has been shown to be effective in treating atopic dermatitis (AD). This report examines the effect of ethnic origin and baseline disease severity on treatment outcomes in pediatric patients with AD treated with pimecrolimus cream 1%. METHODS: The analysis included 589 patients aged 3 months to 17 years from three 6-week, randomized, multicenter studies of similar design. Patients were treated with pimecrolimus cream 1% or vehicle twice daily. Efficacy, safety and tolerability in Caucasian and non-Caucasian groups were compared. In addition, the effect of baseline disease severity on treatment outcome was investigated. RESULTS: A total of 321 Caucasian and 268 non-Caucasian patients [Blacks, Asians and others (including Hispanics)] with mild, moderate or severe disease at baseline were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the pimecrolimus and vehicle control groups and between Caucasian and non-Caucasian groups. Significantly higher efficacy [measured by Investigators' Global Assessment and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores] was achieved in the pimecrolimus-treated group, compared with the vehicle group, irrespective of ethnic origin. Baseline disease severity had no effect on treatment outcome: patients with both mild and moderate AD responded well to pimecrolimus (absolute change from baseline in EASI score -2.60 and -5.48, respectively; both P < 0.001). Pimecrolimus cream 1% was safe and well tolerated in all ethnic groups and at all levels of disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic origin and baseline disease severity had no effect on treatment outcome with pimecrolimus cream 1% in patients with AD.     

Skin physiological parameters confirm the therapeutic efficacy of pimecrolimus cream 1% in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis

Abstract:  In this double-blind, within-patient vehicle-controlled study, patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) were treated for 3 weeks twice daily with pimecrolimus cream 1% on one forearm and with vehicle cream on the other forearm. Efficacy of treatment was assessed clinically using the Atopic Dermatitis Severity Index (ADSI), the Investigators Global Assessment (IGA) and the pruritus visual analogue scale. In parallel, blood microcirculation in the skin was measured as an objective parameter for skin inflammation. Skin hydration and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were monitored as parameter relevant for the barrier function. Treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% resulted in a quick and marked improvement of signs and symptoms of AD and a significant reduction of microcirculation from 33.90 to 15.55 AU ( P  < 0.0001). Skin hydration increased continually from 42.86 to 52.69 AU ( P  = 0.002) and TEWL decreased from 35.30 to 21.50 g/m²/h ( P  = 0.001), indicating restoration of skin barrier. At vehicle-treated sites changes of skin physiological parameters were less pronounced and observed only initially with later plateau or even reversal. At the end of the study, there were significant differences for all measured skin physiological parameters between pimecrolimus cream 1% and vehicle: microcirculation 12.15 AU ( P  = 0.004), skin hydration 7.12 AU ( P  = 0.002), TEWL 11.38 g/m²/h ( P  = 0.004). Non-invasive evaluation of microcirculation and barrier functionality thus represent a valuable tool for the objective assessment of treatment response to pimecrolimus cream 1%.     

Efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% in adult patients with vitiligo: Results of a randomized,double‐blind,vehicle‐controlled study

Background: Vitiligo is an acquired, pigmentary skin disorder which is disfiguring and difficult to treat. In an earlier open label study in adult patients with vitiligo, pimecrolimus cream 1% was reported to have similar efficacy as clobetasol propionate 0.05%. We performed a double‐blind, intrapatient comparison of pimecrolimus cream 1% with placebo cream. Patients and methods: Twenty adult Caucasians with symmetrical vitiligo (predominantly on extremities, none in the face) were treated b.i.d. for 6 months left/right with pimecrolimus/vehicle (N = 10) or vehicle/pimecrolimus (N = 10), respectively. Primary efficacy endpoint was the size of the target lesion at month 6 and secondary efficacy endpoint was re‐pigmentation. Results: Treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% or vehicle resulted in no significant change in mean target lesion size. Modest repigmentation (1–25%) was noted with pimecrolimus at month 2 in 12 of 17 patients (vehicle: 9 of 17 patients). Afterwards, the number of patients who experienced an improvement of pigmentation steadily decreased (3 of 14 patients with pimecrolimus and 2 of 14 with placebo at month 6).Treatment was well tolerated.There were no treatment‐related adverse events, no induction of skin atrophy nor any other application site side effects. Conclusion: In this group of adult patients with symmetrical vitiligo, treatment of body lesions (except face) with pimecrolimus cream 1% could not be shown to be effective.     

An open-label efficacy pilot study with pimecrolimus cream 1% in adults with facial seborrhoeic dermatitis infected with HIV

BACKGROUND: Seborrhoeic dermatitis (SD) is a common dermatosis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients, many of whom do not respond satisfactorily to conventional topical treatments such as corticosteroids and antifungals. OBJECTIVE: A pilot study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of pimecrolimus cream 1% in HIV-positive patients with facial SD. METHODS: In a single-centre study, 21 HIV-infected patients with mild to severe SD were treated twice daily with pimecrolimus cream 1% for 14 days. Thereafter, treatment was discontinued and patients followed up for 5 weeks. Skin involvement at baseline and on days 7, 14, 21, 35 and 49 was assessed using a four-point clinical score and digital photography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% treatment and incidence of relapse in the follow-up phase. Results Marked improvement was seen in clinical parameters at day 7, with >or= 90% patients clear of symptoms at day 14. Relapse was observed at day 35 but signs were milder than at baseline. All patients responded to therapy, despite their immunological status. Pimecrolimus did not alter CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell counts or viral load during the treatment period. CONCLUSION: Pimecrolimus cream represents a new, effective therapeutic option for facial SD in HIV patients.