Early mobilization of LVAD recipients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation

Early mobilization and aggressive physical therapy are essential in patients who receive left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) due to long-term, end-stage heart failure. Some of these patients remain ventilator dependent for quite some time after device implantation. We report our regimen of mobilization with the aid of a portable ventilator, in patients with cardiac cachexia and LVAD implantation. Further, we describe the specific physical therapy interventions used in an LVAD patient who required prolonged mechanical ventilation after device implantation. The patient was critically ill for 5 weeks before the surgery and was ventilator dependent for 48 days postoperatively. There were significant functional gains during the period of prolonged mechanical ventilation. The patient was able to walk up to 600 feet by the time he was weaned from the ventilator and transferred out of the intensive care unit. He underwent successful heart transplantation 6 weeks after being weaned from the ventilator We believe that improving the mobility of LVAD patients who require mechanical ventilation has the potential both to facilitate ventilator weaning and to improve the outcomes of transplantation.     

Role of Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices: the Importance of Emerging Technologies

The role of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) in patients with end-stage heart failure is well known, both as a temporary treatment before transplantation and as destination therapy, in a scenario of a relative shortage of donors to satisfy the increasing requests for transplantation. The increased population of LVAD patients needs careful imaging assessment before, during, and after LVAD implantation; echocardiography is the best tool for their evaluation and is considered the diagnostic technique of choice for the assessment before, during, and after device implantation. Although the conventional echocardiographic assessment is quite effective in evaluating the main critical issues, the role of new technologies like three-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial deformation measurements is still not properly clarified. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the main elements that should be considered in the assessment of these patients, underlining the role that could be played by new techniques to improve the diagnostic and prognostic effectiveness of echocardiography in this setting.     

Left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure: patient selection and outcomes

Despite improvements in pharmacological therapy and pacing, prognosis in advanced heart failure (HF) remains poor, with a 1‐year mortality of 25–50%. While heart transplantation provides excellent survival and quality of life for eligible patients, only a few can be offered this treatment due to shortage of donor organs. Implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technology has improved considerably, and the currently used continuous flow devices may last >10 years in a patient. LVADs are being used increasingly both as bridge‐to‐transplantation and as destination therapy. Current studies report 1‐ and 2‐year survival after LVAD implantation of 80% and 70%, respectively. Outcome after LVAD implantation in stable patients is superior to that of ‘crash and burn’ patients or patients sliding on inotropes, favouring early referral and implantation. This review summarizes factors to consider when deciding on LVAD implantation such as age, co‐morbidity, and cardiac pathophysiology. Complications to LVAD therapy are reviewed. It is concluded that while complications with LVAD therapy are not uncommon, most are manageable, and current outcomes clearly justify use of LVADs in advanced HF.     

Dealing with surgical left ventricular assist device complications

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) will undoubtedly have an increasing role due to the aging population, anticipated concomitant increase in the prevalence of end-stage heart failure, and improvements in LVAD technology and outcomes. As with any surgical procedure, LVAD implantation is associated with an adverse event profile. Such complications of LVAD therapy include bleeding, infection, pump thrombosis, right heart failure, device malfunction, and stroke. Although each has a unique management, early recognition and diagnosis of these complications is uniformly paramount. In this review, we provide an overview of managing surgical complications of LVADs.     

Medical Management of Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: A Practical Guide for the Nonexpert Clinician

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide short- or long-term circulatory support to improve survival and reduce morbidity in selected patients with advanced heart failure. LVADs are being used increasingly and now have expanded indications. Health care providers across specialties will therefore not only encounter LVAD patients but play an integral role in their care. To accomplish that, they need to understand the elements of LVAD function, physiology and clinical use. This article provides a concise overview of the medical management of LVAD patients for nonexpert clinicians. Our presentation includes the basics of LVAD physiology, design, and operation, patient selection and assessment, medical management, adverse event identification and management, multidisciplinary care, and management of special circumstances, such as noncardiac surgery, cardiac arrest, and end-of-life care. The clinical examination of LVAD patients is unique in terms of blood pressure and heart rate assessment, LVAD “hum” auscultation, driveline and insertion site inspection, and device parameter recording. Important potential device-related adverse events include stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, hematologic disorders, device infection, LVAD dysfunction, arrhythmias, and heart failure. Special considerations include the approach to the unconscious or pulseless patient, noncardiac surgery, and palliative care. An understanding of the principles presented in this paper will enable the nonexpert clinician to be effective in collaborating with an LVAD center in the assessment, medical management, and follow-up of LVAD patients. Future opportunities and challenges include the improvement of device designs, greater application of minimally invasive surgical implantation techniques, and management of health economics in cost-constrained systems like those of Canada and many other jurisdictions.     

Difficult cases in heart failure: Left ventricular assist device implantation for the treatment of recurrent ventricular tachycardia in end stage heart failure

The authors describe the surgical implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and recurring episodes of ventricular tachycardia with associated sudden death, as a therapeutic intervention for the recurrent ventricular arrhythmias. The clinical inference of this report demonstrates that these devices are useful as a bridge to heart transplantation, not only improving the symptoms of heart failure but also suppressing malignant ventricular arrhythmias. (c) 1999 by CHF, Inc.     

The dilemma of a left ventricular assist device explantation: a decision analysis

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an important adjunct to the management of end-stage heart failure patients. Uncertainty remains regarding whether to remove an LVAD in a clinically stable, asymptomatic patient who displays signs of ventricular recovery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, from a patient's perspective, the quality-adjusted life expectancy of an LVAD explantation. METHODS: A Markov state transition model was used to assess the benefits of two strategies: remove an LVAD or continue the LVAD support. Effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life months. Utility and probability scores were derived from the literature and expert opinion. The base case focused on a 35-year-old man with dilated cardiomyopathy, an implantable LVAD and signs of ventricular recovery, with New York Heart Association class I heart failure symptoms. RESULTS: In the base case, continuing LVAD support was strongly preferred and improved quality-adjusted life expectancy by nine quality-adjusted life months. In sensitivity analyses for the utility post-transplant, removal of the device would have been preferred if the utility was less than 0.7. The model was also sensitive to the probability of late complications post-LVAD implantation. As the probability of complications increased (greater than 28%), the preferred strategy was to remove the LVAD. CONCLUSIONS: Continuing LVAD support in asymptomatic patients with signs of ventricular recovery appears to be the preferred strategy for conveying greater quality-adjusted life months compared with LVAD explantation. As the probability of complications after LVAD implantation increases, the preferred strategy is to remove the LVAD.     

The impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy in an end-stage heart failure patient with a left ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery. A case report

A 15-year-old male with acute decompensated heart failure was referred to our hospital for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as a bridge to recovery. Despite optimal medication, repetitive LVAD off-pump test findings suggested that his cardiac function had not improved enough to perform LVAD removal. However, his cardiac function significantly improved with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). He underwent LVAD explantation and was successfully discharged from the hospital. We describe the case of an end-stage heart failure patient who underwent successful LVAD removal with CRT. The effect of CRT was definitively evaluated with right heart catheterization during LVAD off-pump test.     

The future of left ventricular assist devices

The widespread acceptance of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in the treatment of heart failure has revolutionized the way end stage heart failure is treated. Advances in LVAD technology combined with a better understanding of patient selection has led to unparalleled survival as well as a reduction in the adverse event profile of these pumps. As our understanding of heart failure continues to grow, there is little doubt that LVADs will continue to play a pivotal role as a therapeutic option for those suffering from heart failure.     

Minimally invasive is the future of left ventricular assist device implantation

There have been many factors that have allowed for progressive improvement in outcomes and lower complication rates. These include the improvement in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) technologies, combined with better understanding of patient management, all these. Nowadays the numbers of LVAD implantations exceed the number of annual heart transplants worldwide. Minimally invasive procedures are shown to improve the surgical outcome in both LVAD insertion and replacement. These minimally invasive techniques can be grouped grossly into shifting from on-pump to off-pump implantation, alternative access for implantation other than sternotomy, and a combination of both, which should be the ultimate aim of minimally invasive LVAD implantation. Here we describe the alternative techniques and configurations of minimally invasive and sites of implantation.     

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in left ventricular assist device: A case report

Introduction:Mechanical circulatory support such as the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has become widely implemented in the treatment of end-stage heart failure, whether as bridge-to-transplant or as destination therapy. The hemodynamic effects of arrhythmia on LVADs and its management are significant in determining the long-term outcome of these patients. Both atrial arrhythmia and ventricular arrhythmia are commonly seen after implantation of the device. There are no strict guidelines, however, on the need for intensive management of arrhythmias in LVAD. In this case report, we present a patient with new onset atrial fibrillation after LVAD implantation which leads to acute decompensating heart failure. The patient was treated with catheter ablation. The intervention demonstrated positive outcomes for this patient.Patient concerns:The patient was a Korean male, who presented with dyspnea, fatigue and generalized edema after persistent atrial fibrillation precipitated by implantation of the left ventricular assist device.Diagnosis:The patient was diagnosed with acute decompensating heart failure that was aggravated by recurrent atrial arrhythmia.Intervention:We attempted to relieve symptoms of right ventricular dysfunction by method of strict rhythm control in this patient. The patient underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation.Outcome:The patient showed improved clinical symptoms, BNP levels, and echocardiogram parameters immediately after the procedure as well as during long term outpatient follow up.Conclusion:In this case report, we present the first successful case in Korea of atrial fibrillation in LVAD treated with catheter ablation. This case suggests setting catheter ablation as a routine first-line treatment for atrial arrhythmia in LVAD patients, especially when the arrhythmia predisposes the patient at risk for decompensating heart failure.     

Deep Y-Descent in Right Atrial Waveforms Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BackgroundCharacterization of right heart catheterization (RHC) waveforms provides diagnostic and clinical information in heart failure patients. We aimed to investigate the implication of RHC waveforms, specifically the y-descent, in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD).Methods and ResultsPatients underwent RHC and waveforms were quantified prior to and 6 months after LVAD implantation. The impact of a deep y-descent (>3 mmHg) on echocardiographic measures of right heart function and 1-year hemocompatibility-related adverse event rates were investigated. Eighty-nine patients (median 59 years old, 65 male) underwent RHC. RHC waveform showed unique changes following LVAD implantation, particularly an increase in the steepness of the y-descent. A post-LVAD deep y-descent was associated with reduced right ventricular function and enlarged right heart. Patients with post-LVAD deep y-descent had higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (0.866 vs 0.191 events/year) and stroke (0.199 vs 0 events/year) compared with those without (P< .05 for both).ConclusionRHC waveforms characterized by deep y-descent on RHC waveform during LVAD support was associated with impaired right ventricular function and worse clinical outcomes.     

Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation in a Patient with a Left Ventricular Assist Device Already in Place

A 56-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy, a biventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), and a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) developed a pocket hematoma and infection after an ICD generator change. The biventricular ICD was extracted, and the patient was given a full course of antibiotics. Because he had no indications for bradycardia pacing or biventricular pacing, he was implanted with a subcutaneous ICD under full anticoagulation. There was no interference in sensing or shock delivery from the ICD. The LVAD readings were unchanged during and after the procedure. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course, and both devices were functioning normally.To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of the implantation of a subcutaneous ICD in the presence of an LVAD. This report illustrates that both devices can be implanted successfully in the same patient. In addition, the subcutaneous ICD minimizes the risk of bloodstream infections, which can be fatal in patients who have life-supporting devices such as an LVAD.     

Apoptosis, Bcl-2, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen in the failing human heart: observations made after implantation of left ventricular assist device

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is characterized by progressive left ventricular remodeling, a complex process that results from cell growth and cell death. The quantitative contribution of apoptotic cells toward left ventricular remodeling has varied widely in tissue removed from cardiomyopathic hearts. Apoptosis has been responsive to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in experimental heart failure, but the dynamics and responsiveness to chronic left ventricular unloading have not been studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 8 patients with severe heart failure before and after chronic left ventricular unloading with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Tissue from the left ventricular apex removed at the time of LVAD implantation was examined for apoptosis using the technique of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick end-labeling (TUNEL) in 10 patients. These same hearts explanted at the time of cardiac transplantation were then examined for apoptosis after patients had been on the LVAD for 99 +/- 20 (SEM) days. An additional 10 patients with equally severe heart failure who underwent heart transplantation without the use of an LVAD served as controls. Eight hearts obtained at autopsy approximately 6 hours after death from patients who died of non-cardiovascular disease causes served as non-heart failure controls. Additionally, 6 hearts were examined by immunohistochemistry for the antiapoptotic protein, Bcl-2, and for the repair and/or proliferation marker, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), before and after LVAD. Apoptosis was not detected in the tissue sections from the hearts of 8 patients at the time of LVAD implantation. Only 1 of these patients had limited apoptosis (< 1 apoptotic cell/1,000 myocytes) after LVAD insertion. Three of 10 patients with severe heart failure who did not receive an LVAD but underwent transplantation showed limited apoptosis (< 1 apoptotic cell/1,000 myocytes). Likewise, none of the control hearts from patients who died of noncardiovascular disease manifested apoptosis. Six of 6 patients overexpressed Bcl-2 at the time of LVAD insertion. In all these patients, Bcl-2 returned to negligible levels after chronic unloading of the heart. Likewise, PCNA was abundantly expressed in 5 of 6 failing hearts at the time of LVAD implantation and was reduced in 4 of 5 hearts after chronic unloading by LVAD. CONCLUSION: Apoptosis is a rare or inconsistent finding in the failing human heart. Overexpression of such indicators of cellular stress and DNA replication and/or repair as Bcl-2 and PNCA in heart failure may be altered by optimizing left ventricular loading conditions by such mechanical devices as the LVAD.     

Trends and outcomes of device-related 30-day readmissions after left ventricular assist device implantation

BackgroundLeft ventricular assist devices (LVAD) improve morbidity and mortality in end-stage heart failure patients, but high rates of readmissions remain a problem after implantation. We aimed to assess the incidence, trends, outcomes, and predictors of device-related 30-day readmissions after LVAD implantation.MethodsThe National Readmission Database was used to identify patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2012 and 2017 and those with 30-day readmissions.ResultsThe analysis included a total of 16499 adults who survived the index hospitalization for LVAD implantation. Among those, 28.1% were readmitted at 30 days, and the readmission rate has been grossly stable during the study period. Most of the readmissions occurred in the first 15 days after discharge from the index admission. The most frequent cause of readmissions was gastrointestinal bleeding (14.9% of readmissions), followed by heart failure, arrhythmias, device infection, and device thrombosis. Among reasons for readmission, intracranial bleeding was associated with highest mortality (37.6%), followed by device thrombosis (13.1%), and ischemic stroke (7.6%). Intracranial bleeding and device thrombosis were associated with lengthier stay (20.4 and 15.5 days, respectively). Readmission rates for gastrointestinal bleeding decreased, whereas device infection increased. Multivariate logistic regression model revealed the length of stay, oxygen dependence, gastrointestinal bleeding at index admission, depression and ECMO, private insurance as independent predictors of 30-day readmission.ConclusionOver one-fourth of LVAD recipients have 30-day readmissions, with most of them occurring within 15 days. Most frequent cause of readmission was gastrointestinal bleeding, which was associated with the lowest in-hospital mortality among other complications.     

Phospholamban p.Arg14del Cardiomyopathy: A Japanese Case Series

Phospholamban p.Arg14del is reported to cause hereditary cardiomyopathy with malignant ventricular tachycardia (VT) and advanced heart failure. However, the clinical courses of Japanese cardiomyopathy patients with phospholamban p.Arg14del remain uncharacterized. We identified five patients with this variant. All patients were diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), developed end-stage heart failure and experienced VT requiring implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharge. Four patients survived after implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), while one patient who refused LVAD implantation died of heart failure. Based on the severe course of the disease, we propose genetic screening for phospholamban p.Arg14del in DCM patients.     

Heart Failure in Remission for More than 13 Years after Removal of a Left Ventricular Assist Device

Mechanical cardiac unloading with use of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is associated with substantial improvements in left ventricular function and enables subsequent LVAD explantation in some patients. We describe the case of a 35-year-old man with dilated nonischemic cardiomyopathy who was supported with an LVAD for 9 months. After the device was removed, he led a normal life for 13 years and 4 months. However, at 49 years of age, he presented with new signs and symptoms of heart failure, necessitating implantation of a 2nd LVAD. Afterwards, he has remained asymptomatic. This case is unique in that the patient lived a normal life for longer than a decade before renewed left ventricular decompensation necessitated repeat LVAD therapy. Histologic examination revealed few changes between the first device''s removal in 1999 and the 2nd device''s implantation in 2012.     

Comparison of the relation of the ESC 2021 and ESC 2013 definitions of left bundle branch block with clinical and echocardiographic outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Introduction

We aimed to investigate the impact of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline changes in left bundle branch block (LBBB) definition on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patient selection and outcomes.

Methods

The MUG (Maastricht, Utrecht, Groningen) registry, consisting of consecutive patients implanted with a CRT device between 2001 and 2015 was studied. For this study, patients with baseline sinus rhythm and QRS duration ≥ 130ms were eligible. Patients were classified according to ESC 2013 and 2021 guideline LBBB definitions and QRS duration. Endpoints were heart transplantation, LVAD implantation or mortality (HTx/LVAD/mortality) and echocardiographic response (LVESV reduction ≥15%).

Results

The analyses included 1.202, typical CRT patients. The ESC 2021 definition resulted in considerably less LBBB diagnoses compared to the 2013 definition (31.6% vs. 80.9%, respectively). Applying the 2013 definition resulted in significant separation of the Kaplan–Meier curves of HTx/LVAD/mortality (p < .0001). A significantly higher echocardiographic response rate was found in the LBBB compared to the non-LBBB group using the 2013 definition. These differences in HTx/LVAD/mortality and echocardiographic response were not found when applying the 2021 definition.

Conclusion

The ESC 2021 LBBB definition leads to a considerably lower percentage of patients with baseline LBBB then the ESC 2013 definition. This does not lead to better differentiation of CRT responders, nor does this lead to a stronger association with clinical outcomes after CRT. In fact, stratification according to the 2021 definition is not associated with a difference in clinical or echocardiographic outcome, implying that the guideline changes may negatively influence CRT implantation practice with a weakened recommendation in patients that will benefit from CRT.     

The Incremental Value of Right Ventricular Size and Strain in the Risk Assessment of Right Heart Failure Post - Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Background

Right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Existing risk scores include semiquantitative evaluation of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. This study aimed to determine whether quantitative evaluation of both RV size and function improve risk stratification for RHF after LVAD implantation beyond validated scores.

Ventricular Assist Devices (VAD) Therapy: New Technology,New Hope?

Ventricular assist devices are commonly utilized in the treatment of end-stage heart failure. Advances in continuous flow technology have improved efficiency, size, implantability, extended support, and overall patient outcomes. This has led to an expanded role of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) clinical use and applications. This review describes the advances and current state of LVAD devices and provides a future outlook for this technology.