共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 13 毫秒
1.
Marsh Königs Eva A. Beurskens Lian Snoep Erik J. Scherder Jaap Oosterlaan 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(6):1149-1159.e1
Objective
To systematically review evidence on the effects of timing and intensity of neurorehabilitation on the functional recovery of patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and aggregate the available evidence using meta-analytic methods.Data Sources
PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Database.Study Selection
Electronic databases were searched for prospective controlled clinical trials assessing the effect of timing or intensity of multidisciplinary neurorehabilitation programs on functional outcome of patients with moderate or severe TBI. A total of 5961 unique records were screened for relevance, of which 58 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility by 2 independent authors. Eleven articles were included for systematic review and meta-analysis.Data Extraction
Two independent authors performed data extraction and risk of bias analysis using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Discrepancies between authors were resolved by consensus.Data Synthesis
Systematic review of a total of 6 randomized controlled trials, 1 quasi-randomized trial, and 4 controlled trials revealed consistent evidence for a beneficial effect of early onset neurorehabilitation in the trauma center and intensive neurorehabilitation in the rehabilitation facility on functional outcome compared with usual care. Meta-analytic quantification revealed a large-sized positive effect for early onset rehabilitation programs (d=1.02; P<.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56–1.47) and a medium-sized positive effect for intensive neurorehabilitation programs (d=.67; P<.001; 95% CI, .38–.97) compared with usual care. These effects were replicated based solely on studies with a low overall risk of bias.Conclusions
The available evidence indicates that early onset neurorehabilitation in the trauma center and more intensive neurorehabilitation in the rehabilitation facility promote functional recovery of patients with moderate to severe TBI compared with usual care. These findings support the integration of early onset and more intensive neurorehabilitation in the chain of care for patients with TBI. 相似文献2.
3.
Jennifer H. Marwitz Adam P. Sima Jeffrey S. Kreutzer Laura E. Dreer Thomas F. Bergquist Ross Zafonte Douglas Johnson-Greene Elizabeth R. Felix 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(2):264-271
Objectives
To evaluate (1) the trajectory of resilience during the first year after a moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI); (2) factors associated with resilience at 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury; and (3) changing relationships over time between resilience and other factors.Design
Longitudinal analysis of an observational cohort.Setting
Five inpatient rehabilitation centers.Participants
Patients with TBI (N=195) enrolled in the resilience module of the TBI Model Systems study with data collected at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measure
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale.Results
Initially, resilience levels appeared to be stable during the first year postinjury. Individual growth curve models were used to examine resilience over time in relation to demographic, psychosocial, and injury characteristics. After adjusting for these characteristics, resilience actually declined over time. Higher levels of resilience were related to nonminority status, absence of preinjury substance abuse, lower anxiety and disability level, and greater life satisfaction.Conclusions
Resilience is a construct that is relevant to understanding brain injury outcomes and has potential value in planning clinical interventions. 相似文献4.
Erik Grauwmeijer Majanka H. Heijenbrok-KalGerard M. Ribbers MD PhD 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2014
Objectives
To evaluate the time course of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to identify its predictors.Design
Prospective cohort study with follow-up measurements at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after TBI.Setting
Patients with moderate to severe TBI discharged from 3 level-1 trauma centers.Participants
Patients (N=97, 72% men) with a mean age ± SD of 32.8±13.0 years (range, 18–65y), hospitalized with moderate (23%) or severe (77%) TBI.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures
HRQoL was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), functional outcomes with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), Barthel Index, FIM, and Functional Assessment Measure, and mood with the Wimbledon Self-Report Scale.Results
The SF-36 domains showed significant improvement over time for Physical Functioning (P<.001), Role Physical (P<.001), Bodily Pain (P<.001), Social Functioning (P<.001), and Role Emotional (P=.024), but not for General Health (P=.263), Vitality (P=.530), and Mental Health (P=.138). Over time there was significant improvement in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) score, whereas the Mental Component Summary (MCS) score remained stable. At 3-year follow-up, HRQoL of patients with TBI was the same as that in the Dutch normative population. Time after TBI, hospital length of stay (LOS), FIM, and GOS were independent predictors of the PCS, whereas LOS and mood were predictors of the MCS.Conclusions
After TBI, the physical component of HRQoL showed significant improvement over time, whereas the mental component remained stable. Problems of disease awareness seem to play a role in self-reported mental HRQoL. After TBI, mood status is a better predictor of the mental component of HRQoL than functional outcome, implying that mood should be closely monitored during and after rehabilitation. 相似文献5.
Cynthia L. Harrison-Felix Gale G. Whiteneck Amitabh Jha Michael J. DeVivo Flora M. Hammond Denise M. Hart 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2009,90(9):1506-1513
Harrison-Felix CL, Whiteneck GG, Jha A, DeVivo MJ, Hammond FM, Hart DM. Mortality over four decades after traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a retrospective cohort study.
Objective
To investigate mortality, life expectancy, risk factors for death, and causes of death in persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI).Design
Retrospective cohort study.Setting
Used data from an inpatient rehabilitation facility, the Social Security Death Index, death certificates, and the U.S. population age-race-sex-specific and cause-specific mortality rates.Participants
Persons with TBI (N=1678) surviving to their first anniversary of injury admitted to rehabilitation from an acute care hospital within 1 year of injury between 1961 and 2002.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures
Vital status, standardized mortality ratio, life expectancy, cause of death.Results
Persons with TBI were 1.5 times more likely to die than persons in the general population of similar age, sex, and race, resulting in an estimated average life expectancy reduction of 4 years. Within the TBI population, the strongest independent risk factors for death after 1 year postinjury were being older, being male, having less education, having a longer hospitalization, having an earlier year of injury, and being in a vegetative state at rehabilitation discharge. After 1 year postinjury, persons with TBI were 49 times more likely to die of aspiration pneumonia, 22 times more likely to die of seizures, 4 times more likely to die of pneumonia, 3 times more likely to commit suicide, and 2.5 times more likely to die of digestive conditions than persons in the general population of similar age, sex, and race.Conclusions
This study demonstrated life expectancy after TBI rehabilitation is reduced and associated with specific risk factors and causes of death. 相似文献6.
Colin M. Bosma Nashwa Mansoor Chiara S. Haller 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(8):1576-1583
Objective
To investigate the relation between posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptom severity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).Design
Longitudinal prospective multicenter, cohort study on severe TBI in Switzerland (2007–2011).Setting
Hospital, rehabilitation unit, and/or patient’s living facility.Participants
Patients with severe TBI (N=109) were included in the analyses. Injury severity was determined using the Abbreviated Injury Score of the head region after clinical assessment and initial computed tomography scan.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures
HRQoL (Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Physical and Mental Component Summaries) and self-reported emotional, cognitive, and interpersonal functioning (Patient Competency Rating Scale for Neurorehabilitation).Results
Multilevel models for patients >50 and ≤50 years of age revealed significant negative associations between PTS symptom severity and interpersonal functioning (P<.001 and P=.002), respectively. Among patients ≤50 years of age, PTS symptom severity was significantly associated with total functioning (P=.001) and emotional functioning (P<.001). Among all patients, PTS symptom severity was significantly associated with cognitive functioning (P<.001) and mental HRQoL (P=.01).Conclusions
Findings indicate that PTS symptoms after severe TBI are negatively associated with HRQoL and emotional, cognitive, and interpersonal functioning. 相似文献7.
Anthony H. Lequerica Christian Lucca Nancy D. Chiaravalloti Irene Ward John D. Corrigan 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(9):1811-1817
Objective
To test the feasibility and validity of an online version of an established interview designed to determine a lifetime history of traumatic brain injury (TBI).Design
Cross-sectional.Setting
General community.Participants
A volunteer sample of individuals (N= 265) from the general population across the United States.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measure(s)
Online version of the Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification Method, Rivermead Postconcussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Cognitive Concerns Scale.Results
The measure was completed by 89.4% of the sample with most participants completing the measure in <8 minutes. After controlling for age, sex, psychiatric history, drug or alcohol history, and history of developmental disability, worst TBI severity was significantly associated with scores on the RPQ, F(2,230)=4.56, P=.011, and having a TBI within the past 2 years was associated with higher scores on the cognitive factor subscale of the RPQ, F(1,75)=7.7, P=.007.Conclusions
The online administration of the Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification Method appears to be feasible in the general population. Preliminary validity was demonstrated for the indices of worst TBI severity and time since most recent TBI. 相似文献8.
Aparna Vadlamani Justin A. Perry Maureen McCunn Deborah M. Stein Jennifer S. Albrecht 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2019,100(9):1622-1628
ObjectiveTo determine if there were racial differences in discharge location among older adults treated for traumatic brain injury (TBI) at a level 1 trauma center.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center.ParticipantsBlack and white adults aged ≥65 years treated for TBI between 1998 and 2012 and discharged to home without services or inpatient rehabilitation (N=2902).Main Outcome MeasuresWe assessed the association between race and discharge location via logistic regression. Covariates included age, sex, Abbreviated Injury Scale-Head score, insurance type, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and comorbidities.ResultsThere were 2487 (86%) whites and 415 blacks (14%) in the sample. A total of 1513 (52%) were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation and 1389 (48%) were discharged home without services. In adjusted logistic regression, blacks were more likely to be discharged to inpatient rehabilitation than to home without services compared to whites (odds ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.70).ConclusionsIn this group of Medicare-eligible older adults, blacks were more likely to be discharged to inpatient rehabilitation compared to whites. 相似文献
9.
Theresa Louise Bender Pape Bridget Smith Judith Babcock-Parziale Charlesnika T. Evans Amy A. Herrold Kelly Phipps Maieritsch Walter M. High 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(7):1370-1382
Objective
To comprehensively estimate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS).Design
Cross-sectional, prospective, observational study using the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy criteria.Setting
Three VA Polytrauma Network Sites.Participants
Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom veterans (N=433).Main Outcome Measures
TCRS, Comprehensive TBI Evaluation, Structured TBI Diagnostic Interview, Symptom Attribution and Classification Algorithm, and Clinician-Administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale.Results
Forty-five percent of veterans screened positive on the TCRS for TBI. For detecting occurrence of historical TBI, the TCRS had a sensitivity of .56 to .74, a specificity of .63 to .93, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 25% to 45%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91% to 94%, and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 4 to 13. For accuracy of attributing active symptoms to the TBI, the TCRS had a sensitivity of .64 to .87, a specificity of .59 to .89, a PPV of 26% to 32%, an NPV of 92% to 95%, and a DOR of 6 to 9. The sensitivity was higher for veterans with PTSD (.80–.86) relative to veterans without PTSD (.57–.82). The specificity, however, was higher among veterans without PTSD (.75–.81) relative to veterans with PTSD (.36–.49). All indices of diagnostic accuracy changed when participants with questionably valid (QV) test profiles were eliminated from analyses.Conclusions
The utility of the TCRS to screen for mild TBI (mTBI) depends on the stringency of the diagnostic reference standard to which it is being compared, the presence/absence of PTSD, and QV test profiles. Further development, validation, and use of reproducible diagnostic algorithms for symptom attribution after possible mTBI would improve diagnostic accuracy. 相似文献10.
11.
12.
Duncan Mortimer Jessica Trevena-Peters Adam McKay Jennie Ponsford 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2019,100(4):648-655
Objective
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of structured activities of daily living (ADL) retraining during posttraumatic amnesia (PTA) plus treatment as usual (TAU) vs TAU alone for inpatient rehabilitation following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).Design
Trial-based economic evaluation from a health-system perspective.Setting
Inpatient rehabilitation center.Participants
Participants (N=104) admitted to rehabilitation and in PTA for >7 days following severe TBI.Interventions
Structured ADL retraining during PTA plus TAU vs TAU alone. Structured ADL retraining was manualized to minimize the risk of agitation and maximize functional improvement, following principles of errorless and procedural learning and targeting individualized therapy goals. TAU included physiotherapy and/or speech therapy during PTA plus ADL retraining after PTA emergence.Main Outcome Measures
FIM total scores at baseline, PTA emergence, hospital discharge, or final follow-up (2mo postdischarge) where FIM total scores were calculated as the sum of 5 FIM motor self-care items and a FIM meal-preparation item.Results
Structured ADL retraining during PTA significantly increased functional independence at PTA emergence (mean difference: 4.90, SE: 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5, 8.3) and hospital discharge (mean difference: 5.22, SE: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.8, 8.7). Even in our most pessimistic scenario, structured ADL retraining was cost-saving as compared to TAU (mean: -$7762; 95% CI: -$8105, -$7419). Together, these results imply that structured ADL retraining dominates (less costly but no less effective) TAU when effectiveness is evaluated at PTA emergence and hospital discharge.Conclusions
Structured ADL retraining during PTA yields net cost-savings to the health system and offers a cost-effective means of increasing functional independence at PTA emergence and hospital discharge. 相似文献13.
O. Trent Hall Ryan P. McGrath Mark D. Peterson Edmund H. Chadd Michael J. DeVivo Allen W. Heinemann Claire Z. Kalpakjian 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2019,100(1):95-100
Objective
To quantify the burden of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) as defined by nonfatal health loss and premature mortality among a large sample of participants over a 44-year period, and estimate the national burden of SCI in the United States for the year 2010.Design
Longitudinal.Setting
National SCI Model Systems and Shriners Hospitals.Participants
Individuals (N=51,226) were categorized by neurologic level of injury as cervical (n=28,178) or thoracic and below (n=23,048).Main Outcome Measures
The burden of SCI was calculated in years lost due to premature mortality (YLL), years lived with disability (YLD), and disability-adjusted life years (DALY).Results
For those with cervical level injuries, the overall YLLs and YLDs were 253,745 and 445,709, respectively, for an estimated total of 699,454 DALYs. For those with thoracic and below level injuries, the overall YLLs and YLDs were 153,885 and 213,160, respectively, for an estimated total of 367,045 DALYs. Proportionally adjusted DALYs attributable to SCI in 2010 were 445,911.Conclusions
SCIs accounted for over 1 million years of healthy life lost in a national sample over a 44-year span. We estimated that 445,911 DALYs resulted from SCIs in the US in 2010 alone, placing the national burden of SCIs above other impactful conditions such as human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Future investigations may employ DALYs to monitor trends in SCI burden in response to innovations in SCI care and identify subgroups of persons with SCIs for whom tailored interventions might improve DALYs. 相似文献14.
James F. Malec Flora M. Hammond 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(3):603-606.e1
Objective
To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for a Rasch measure derived from the Irritability/Lability and Agitation/Aggression subscales of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)—the Rasch NPI Irritability and Aggression Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury (NPI-TBI-IA).Design
Distribution-based statistical methods were applied to retrospective data to determine candidates for the MCID. These candidates were evaluated by anchoring the NPI-TBI-IA to Global Impression of Change (GIC) ratings by participants, significant others, and a supervising physician.Setting
Postacute rehabilitation outpatient clinic.Participants
274 cases with observer ratings; 232 cases with self-ratings by participants with moderate-severe TBI at least 6 months postinjury.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measure
NPI-TBI-IA.Results
For observer ratings on the NPI-TBI-IA, anchored comparisons found an improvement of 0.5 SD was associated with at least minimal general improvement on GIC by a significant majority (69%–80%); 0.5 SD improvement on participant NPI-TBI-IA self-ratings was also associated with at least minimal improvement on the GIC by a substantial majority (77%–83%). The percentage indicating significant global improvement did not increase markedly on most ratings at higher levels of improvement on the NPI-TBI-IA.Conclusions
A 0.5 SD improvement on the NPI-TBI-IA indicates the MCID for both observer and participant ratings on this measure. 相似文献15.
Cynthia Harrison-Felix Jody K. Newman Lenore Hawley Clare Morey Jessica M. Ketchum William C. Walker Kathleen R. Bell Scott R. Millis Cynthia Braden James Malec Flora M. Hammond C.B. Eagye Laura Howe 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(11):2131-2142
Objective
To evaluate the effectiveness of a replicable group treatment program for improving social competence after traumatic brain injury (TBI).Design
Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing 2 methods of conducting a social competency skills program, an interactive group format versus a classroom lecture.Setting
Community and veteran rehabilitation centers.Participants
Civilian, military, and veteran adults with TBI and social competence difficulties (N=179), at least 6 months postinjury.Interventions
The experimental intervention consisted of 13 weekly group interactive sessions (1.5h) with structured and facilitated group interactions to improve social competence, and the control consisted of 13 traditional classroom sessions using the same curriculum with brief supplemental individual sessions but without structured group interaction.Main Outcome Measures
Profile of Pragmatic Impairment in Communication (PPIC), an objective behavioral rating of social communication impairments after TBI. LaTrobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ), Goal Attainment Scale (GAS), Satisfaction with Life Scale, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-C (PCL) civilian version, Brief Symptom Inventory 18 (BSI-18), Scale of Perceived Social Self-Efficacy (PSSE).Results
Social competence goals (GAS) were achieved and maintained for most participants regardless of treatment method. Significant improvements in the primary outcome (PPIC) and 2 of the secondary outcomes (LCQ and BSI) were seen immediately posttreatment and at 3 months posttreatment in the alternative treatment arm only; however, these improvements were not significantly different between the group interactive structured treatment and alternative treatment arms. Similar trends were observed for PSSE and PCL-C.Conclusions
Social competence skills improved for persons with TBI in both treatment conditions. The group interactive format was not found to be a superior method of treatment delivery in this study. 相似文献16.
Robin A. Hanks Lisa J. Rapport Brigid Waldron-Perrine Scott R. Millis 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2014
Objective
To examine the effects of character strengths on psychosocial outcomes after mild complicated to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).Design
Prospective study with consecutive enrollment.Setting
A Midwestern rehabilitation hospital.Participants
Persons with mild complicated to severe TBI (N=65).Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures
Community Integration Measure, Disability Rating Scale, Modified Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Satisfaction with Life Scale, Values in Action Inventory of Strengths, and Wechsler Test of Adult Reading.Results
Character virtues and strengths were moderately associated with subjective outcomes, such that there were fewer and less strong associations between character virtues/strengths and objective outcomes than subjective outcomes. Specifically, positive attributes were associated with greater life satisfaction and perceived community integration. Fewer and less strong associations were observed for objective well-being; however, character strengths and virtues showed unique value in predicting physical health and disability. Positive affectivity was not meaningfully related to objective outcomes, but it was significantly related to subjective outcomes. In contrast, negative affectivity was related to objective but not subjective outcomes.Conclusions
Given the strength of the associations between positive aspects of character or ways of perceiving the world and positive feelings about one's current life situation, treatments focused on facilitating these virtues and strengths in persons who have experienced TBI may result in better perceived outcomes and potentially subsequently lower comorbidities. 相似文献17.
Carly S. Rivers Nader Fallah Vanessa K. Noonan David G. Whitehurst Carolyn E. Schwartz Joel A. Finkelstein B. Catharine Craven Karen Ethans Colleen OConnell B. Catherine Truchon Chester Ho A. Gary Linassi Christine Short Eve Tsai Brian Drew Henry Ahn Marcel F. Dvorak Jér?me Paquet Luc Noreau 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(3):443-451
Objective
To analyze relations among injury, demographic, and environmental factors on function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and life satisfaction in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).Design
Prospective observational registry cohort study.Setting
Specialized acute and rehabilitation SCI centers.Participants
Participants (N=340) from the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) who were prospectively recruited from 2004 to 2014 were included. The model cohort participants were 79.1% men, with a mean age of 41.6±17.3 years. Of the participants, 34.7% were motor/sensory complete (ASIA Impairment Scale [AIS] grade A).Interventions
None.Main Outcome Measures
Path analysis was used to determine relations among SCI severity (AIS grade and anatomic level [cervical/thoracolumbar]), age at injury, education, number of health conditions, functional independence (FIM motor score), HRQoL (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [Version 2] Physical Component Score [PCS] and Mental Component Score [MCS]), and life satisfaction (Life Satisfaction-11 [LiSat-11]). Model fit was assessed using recommended published indices.Results
Goodness of fit of the model was supported by all indices, indicating the model results closely matched the RHSCIR data. Higher age, higher severity injuries, cervical injuries, and more health conditions negatively affected FIM motor score, whereas employment had a positive effect. Higher age, less education, more severe injuries (AIS grades A–C), and more health conditions negatively correlated with PCS (worse physical health). More health conditions were negatively correlated with a lower MCS (worse mental health), however were positively associated with reduced function. Being married and having higher function positively affected Lisat-11, but more health conditions had a negative effect.Conclusions
Complex interactions and enduring effects of health conditions after SCI have a negative effect on function, HRQoL, and life satisfaction. Modeling relations among these types of concepts will inform clinicians how to positively effect outcomes after SCI (eg, development of screening tools and protocols for managing individuals with traumatic SCI who have multiple health conditions). 相似文献18.
Joseph T. Giacino Douglas I. Katz Nicholas D. Schiff John Whyte Eric J. Ashman Stephen Ashwal Richard Barbano Flora M. Hammond Steven Laureys Geoffrey S.F. Ling Risa Nakase-Richardson Ronald T. Seel Stuart Yablon Thomas S.D. Getchius Gary S. Gronseth Melissa J. Armstrong 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(9):1699-1709
Objective
To update the 1995 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) practice parameter on persistent vegetative state and the 2002 case definition on minimally conscious state (MCS) and provide care recommendations for patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (DoC).Methods
Recommendations were based on systematic review evidence, related evidence, care principles, and inferences using a modified Delphi consensus process according to the AAN 2011 process manual, as amended.Recommendations
Clinicians should identify and treat confounding conditions, optimize arousal, and perform serial standardized assessments to improve diagnostic accuracy in adults and children with prolonged DoC (Level B). Clinicians should counsel families that for adults, MCS (vs vegetative state [VS]/ unresponsive wakefulness syndrome [UWS]) and traumatic (vs nontraumatic) etiology are associated with more favorable outcomes (Level B). When prognosis is poor, long-term care must be discussed (Level A), acknowledging that prognosis is not universally poor (Level B). Structural MRI, SPECT, and the Coma Recovery Scale–Revised can assist prognostication in adults (Level B); no tests are shown to improve prognostic accuracy in children. Pain always should be assessed and treated (Level B) and evidence supporting treatment approaches discussed (Level B). Clinicians should prescribe amantadine (100–200 mg bid) for adults with traumatic VS/UWS or MCS (4–16 weeks post injury) to hasten functional recovery and reduce disability early in recovery (Level B). Family counseling concerning children should acknowledge that natural history of recovery, prognosis, and treatment are not established (Level B). Recent evidence indicates that the term chronic VS/UWS should replace permanent VS, with duration specified (Level B). Additional recommendations are included. 相似文献19.
Misti Timpson Erinn M. Hade Cynthia Beaulieu Susan D. Horn Flora M. Hammond Juan Peng Erin Montgomery Clare Giuffrida Kamie Gilchrist Aubrey Lash Marcel Dijkers John D. Corrigan Jennifer Bogner 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2019,100(10):1818-1826
ObjectiveTo use causal inference methods to determine if receipt of a greater proportion of inpatient rehabilitation treatment focused on higher level functions, for example, executive functions, ambulating over uneven surfaces (advanced therapy [AdvTx]), results in better rehabilitation outcomes.DesignA cohort study using propensity score methods applied to the traumatic brain injury practice-based evidence (TBI-PBE) database, a database consisting of multisite, prospective, longitudinal observational data.SettingAcute inpatient rehabilitation facilities.ParticipantsPatients enrolled in the TBI-PBE study (N=1843), aged 14 years or older, who sustained a severe, moderate, or complicated mild TBI, receiving their first inpatient rehabilitation facility admission to 1 of 9 sites in the United States, and consented to follow-up 3 and 9 months postdischarge from inpatient rehabilitation.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresParticipation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective-17, FIM motor and cognitive scores, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9.ResultsControlling for measured potential confounders, increasing the percentage of AdvTx during inpatient TBI rehabilitation was found to be associated with better community participation, functional independence, life satisfaction, and decreased likelihood of depression during the year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Participants who began rehabilitation with greater disability experienced larger gains on some outcomes than those who began rehabilitation with more intact abilities.ConclusionsIncreasing the proportion of treatment targeting higher level functions appears to have no detrimental and a small, beneficial effect on outcome. Caution should be exercised when inferring causality given that a large number of potential confounders could not be completely controlled with propensity score methods. Further, the extent to which unmeasured confounders influenced the findings is not known and could be of particular concern due to the potential for the patient’s recovery trajectory to influence therapists’ decisions to provide a greater amount of AdvTx. 相似文献
20.
Laura C. Simko Liang Chen Dagmar Amtmann Nicole Gibran David Herndon Karen Kowalske A. Cate Miller Eileen Bulger Ryan Friedman Audrey Wolfe Kevin K. Chung Michael Mosier James Jeng Joseph Giacino Ross Zafonte Lewis E. Kazis Jeffrey C. Schneider Colleen M. Ryan 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2019,100(5):891-898