共查询到10条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Gong-Hong Lin Yi-Jing Huang Ya-Chen Lee Shih-Chieh Lee Chia-Yeh Chou Ching-Lin Hsieh 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2019,100(5):899-907
Objective
The authors aimed to develop and validate the Computerized Adaptive Testing System for Assessing 5 Functions in Patients with Stroke (CAT-5F) based on the Barthel Index (BI), Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke patients (PASS), and Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) to improve the efficiency of assessment. The purposes of the CAT-5F assessment are to describe patients’ levels of impairments or disabilities in the 5 functions and to serve as an outcome measure in patients with stroke.Design
This is a data-mining study based on data from a previous study using simulation analysis to develop and validate the CAT-5F.Setting
One rehabilitation unit in a medical center in Taiwan served as the setting for this study.Participants
Data were retrieved from totals of 540 (initial assessment) and 309 (discharge assessment) participants with stroke assessed in a previous study. The assessment data (N=540) were from the BI, PASS, and STREAM.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures
The outcome measures for this study were from BI, PASS, and STREAM.Results
The CAT-5F using the optimal stopping rule (limited reliability increased <0.010) had good Rasch reliability across the 5 functions (0.86-0.96) and needed 12.7 items, on average, for the whole administration. The concurrent validity (Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, r=0.91-0.96) and responsiveness (standardized response mean=0.33-0.91) of the CAT-5F were sufficient in the patients.Conclusion
The CAT-5F has sufficient administrative efficiency, reliability, concurrent validity, and responsiveness to simultaneously assess basic activities of daily living, postural control, upper extremity/lower extremity motor functions, and mobility in patients with stroke. 相似文献2.
Hsin-Yu Chiang Wen-Shian Lu Wan-Hui Yu I-Ping Hsueh Ching-Lin Hsieh 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(8):1499-1506
Objective
To examine the interrater and intrarater reliability of the Balance Computerized Adaptive Test (Balance CAT) in patients with chronic stroke having a wide range of balance functions.Design
Repeated assessments design (1wk apart).Setting
Seven teaching hospitals.Participants
A pooled sample (N=102) including 2 independent groups of outpatients (n=50 for the interrater reliability study; n=52 for the intrarater reliability study) with chronic stroke.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures
Balance CAT.Results
For the interrater reliability study, the values of intraclass correlation coefficient, minimal detectable change (MDC), and percentage of MDC (MDC%) for the Balance CAT were .84, 1.90, and 31.0%, respectively. For the intrarater reliability study, the values of intraclass correlation coefficient, MDC, and MDC% ranged from .89 to .91, from 1.14 to 1.26, and from 17.1% to 18.6%, respectively.Conclusions
The Balance CAT showed sufficient intrarater reliability in patients with chronic stroke having balance functions ranging from sitting with support to independent walking. Although the Balance CAT may have good interrater reliability, we found substantial random measurement error between different raters. Accordingly, if the Balance CAT is used as an outcome measure in clinical or research settings, same raters are suggested over different time points to ensure reliable assessments. 相似文献3.
Ya-Chen Lee Wan-Hui Yu Yu-Fen Lin I-Ping Hsueh Hung-Chia Wu Ching-Lin Hsieh 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2014
Objective
To examine the intrarater reliability, interrater reliability, and responsiveness of the Activities of Daily Living Computerized Adaptive Testing system (ADL CAT) in patients with stroke.Design
One repeated-measures design (at an interval of 7d) was used to examine the intrarater reliability and interrater reliability of the ADL CAT. For the responsiveness study, participants were assessed with the ADL CAT at admission to the rehabilitation ward and at discharge from the hospital.Setting
Eight rehabilitation units.Participants
Three different (nonoverlapping) groups of patients (N=157) were recruited. Fifty-five and 42 outpatients with chronic stroke participated in the intrarater and interrater reliability studies, respectively; 60 inpatients who had recently had a stroke participated in the responsiveness study.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measure
ADL CAT.Results
The intraclass correlation coefficient values were .94 and .80 for the ADL CAT in the intrarater reliability and interrater reliability studies, respectively. The classical test theory–based minimal detectable change values were 6.5 and 9.5 for the ADL CAT in the intrarater reliability and interrater reliability studies, respectively. The Kazis' effect size and standardized response mean of the ADL CAT were moderate (.62–.73).Conclusions
The ADL CAT has good intrarater reliability and interrater reliability in outpatients with chronic stroke, and sufficient responsiveness in inpatients with stroke undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Further investigations on the responsiveness of the ADL CAT in outpatients are needed to obtain more evidence on the utility of the ADL CAT. 相似文献4.
Shih-Chieh Lee Yi-Jing Huang Gong-Hong Lin Yeh-Tai Chou Chia-Yeh Chou Ching-Lin Hsieh 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(2):306-313
Objective
To develop a computerized adaptive test of social functioning (Social-CAT) for patients with stroke.Design
This study contained 2 phases. First, a unidimensional item bank was formed using social-related items with sufficient item fit (ie, infit and outfit mean square [MNSQ]). The social-related items were selected from 3 commonly used patient-reported quality-of-life measures. Items with differential item functioning (DIF) of sex were deleted. Second, we performed simulations to determine the best set of stopping rules with both high reliability and efficiency. The participants' responses to the items were extracted from a previous study.Setting
Rehabilitation wards and departments of rehabilitation/neurology of 5 general hospitals.Participants
Patients (N=263) with stroke (47.1% were inpatients).Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measure
Social-CAT.Results
The unidimensionality of the 24 selected items was supported (infit and outfit MNSQs =0.8–1.2). One item had DIF of sex and was deleted. The item bank was composed of the remaining 23 items. With the best set of stopping rules (person reliability ≥.90 or limited reliability increased ≤.001), the Social-CAT used on average 10 items to achieve sufficient reliability (average person reliability =.88; 81.0% of the patients with reliability ≥.90).Conclusions
The Social-CAT appears to be a unidimensional measure with acceptable reliability and efficiency, and it could be useful for both clinicians and patients in time-pressed clinical settings. 相似文献5.
Chia-Hsin Chen Shih-Feng Lin Wan-Hui Yu Jau-Hong Lin Hao-Ling Chen Ching-Lin Hsieh 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2014
Objective
To compare the test-retest reliabilities of the scores of the Balance Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) and the Biodex Balance System in patients with stroke.Design
A repeated-measures design (at a 1-wk interval) was used to examine the test-retest reliabilities of the scores of the Balance CAT and the Biodex Balance System.Setting
One rehabilitation unit in a local hospital.Participants
Patients (N=50) with stroke for more than 6 months and undergoing outpatient rehabilitation completed the Balance CAT and the eyes open (EO)/closed (EC) tests, but only 17 patients finished the Limit of Stability (LOS) test because they were unable to reach all the targets.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures
The Balance CAT and 2 computerized tests of the Biodex Balance System, namely the EO/EC test and the LOS, were used to evaluate balance function.Results
The test-retest reliabilities of the scores of the Balance CAT (Pearson r=.92, minimal detectable change [MDC] percent=12.8%) was excellent. Those of the EO/EC and LOS tests were poor to good (Pearson r=.56–.85, MDC%=50.8%–126.9%).Conclusions
The test-retest reliabilities of the scores of the Balance CAT were sufficient for assessing balance function in patients with stroke. Moreover, the test-retest reliabilities of the scores of the Balance CAT, one of the functional balance measures, were superior to those of the Biodex Balance System, 1 type of computerized posturography instrument. Therefore, the Balance CAT may be a more reliable measure for clinicians and researchers to use in assessing the balance function of patients with stroke for more than 6 months. 相似文献6.
Yi-Jing Huang Gong-Hong Lin Shih-Chieh Lee Yi-Miau Chen Sheau-Ling Huang Ching-Lin Hsieh 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(3):529-533
Objectives
To examine both group- and individual-level responsiveness of the 3-point Berg Balance Scale (BBS-3P) and 3-point Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS-3P) in patients with stroke, and to compare the responsiveness of both 3-point measures versus their original measures (Berg Balance Scale [BBS] and Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients [PASS]) and their short forms (short-form Berg Balance Scale [SFBBS] and short-form Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients [SFPASS]) and between the BBS-3P and PASS-3P.Design
Data were retrieved from a previous study wherein 212 patients were assessed at 14 and 30 days after stroke with the BBS and PASS.Setting
Medical center.Participants
Patients (N=212) with first onset of stroke within 14 days before hospitalization.Interventions
Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures
Group-level responsiveness was examined by the standardized response mean (SRM), and individual-level responsiveness was examined by the proportion of patients whose change scores exceeded the minimal detectable change of each measure. The responsiveness was compared using the bootstrap approach.Results
The BBS-3P and PASS-3P had good group-level (SRM, .60 and SRM, .56, respectively) and individual-level (48.1% and 44.8% of the patients with significant improvement, respectively) responsiveness. Bootstrap analyses showed that the BBS-3P generally had superior responsiveness to the BBS and SFBBS, and the PASS-3P had similar responsiveness to the PASS and SFPASS. The BBS-3P and PASS-3P were equally responsive to both group and individual change.Conclusions
The responsiveness of the BBS-3P and PASS-3P was comparable or superior to those of the original and short-form measures. We recommend the BBS-3P and PASS-3P as responsive outcome measures of balance for individuals with stroke. 相似文献7.
Jayme S. Knutson Amy S. Friedl Kristine M. Hansen Terri Z. Hisel Mary Y. Harley 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2019,100(1):140-143.e1
Objective
To evaluate the convergent validity and responsiveness of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) in comparison to the Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT), the Box and Blocks Test (BBT), and the upper limb Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA). The SULCS is a relatively new measure that was designed to be easier to score and less time consuming than some existing measures.Design
Prospective repeated-measures design.Setting
Clinical research laboratory of a large public hospital.Participants
Patients (N=61) <2 years poststroke with moderate to severe upper limb hemiparesis.Intervention
Participants received 12 weeks of therapy that included neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the paretic finger and thumb extensors. The SULCS, AMAT, BBT, and FMA were administered at weeks 0, 6, 12 (end of therapy), 20, 28, and 36 (6mo post-therapy).Main Outcome Measures
Convergent validity was evaluated with Spearman’s correlation coefficients between pairs of measures at each time point. Responsiveness from 0 to 12 weeks and 0 to 36 weeks was evaluated with the standardized response mean (SRM).Results
The SULCS demonstrated strong correlation with the AMAT (ρ=0.81-0.93), BBT (ρ=0.73-0.92), and FMA (ρ=0.78-0.92), at all 6 time points. All 4 measures had moderate to large SRMs (SULCS, 0.71-0.77; AMAT, 0.83-0.97; BBT, 0.73-0.82; FMA, 0.75-0.76). There was no significant difference in responsiveness among the 4 measures.Conclusions
The results support the use of the SULCS to measure upper limb capacity in patients who are less than 2 years poststroke with moderate to severe hemiplegia. 相似文献8.
Stephanie Hyeyoung Lee Ji-Yeong Lee Mi-Young Kim Yu-Jin Jeon Suyoung Kim Joon-Ho Shin 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2018,99(8):1447-1453.e1
Objective
To compare virtual reality (VR) combined with functional electrical stimulation (FES) with cyclic FES for improving upper extremity function and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic stroke.Design
A pilot, randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.Setting
Stroke rehabilitation inpatient unit.Participants
Participants (N=48) with hemiplegia secondary to a unilateral stroke for >3 months and with a hemiplegic wrist extensor Medical Research Council scale score ranging from 1 to 3.Interventions
FES was applied to the wrist extensors and finger extensors. A VR-based wearable rehabilitation device was used combined with FES and virtual activity–based training for the intervention group. The control group received cyclic FES only. Both groups completed 20 sessions over a 4-week period.Main Outcome Measures
Primary outcome measures were changes in Fugl-Meyer Assessment–Upper Extremity and Wolf Motor Function Test scores. Secondary outcome measures were changes in Box and Block Test, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, and Stroke Impact Scale scores. Assessments were performed at baseline (t0) and at 2 weeks (t1), 4 weeks (t4), and 8 weeks (t8). Between-group comparisons were evaluated using a repeated-measures analysis of variance.Results
Forty-one participants were included in the analysis. Compared with FES alone, VR-FES produced a substantial increase in Fugl-Meyer Assessment–distal score (P=.011) and marginal improvement in Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test–gross score (P=.057). VR-FES produced greater, although nonsignificant, improvements in all other outcome measures, except in the Stroke Impact Scale–activities of daily living/instrumental activities of daily living score.Conclusions
FES with VR-based rehabilitation may be more effective than cyclic FES in improving distal upper extremity gross motor performance poststroke. 相似文献9.
Mark Meterko Molly Marino Pengsheng Ni Elizabeth Marfeo Christine M. McDonough Alan Jette Kara Peterik Elizabeth Rasch Diane E. Brandt Leighton Chan 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2019,100(8):1442-1449
ObjectiveTo assess psychometric properties of the improved Work Disability Functional Assessment Battery (WD-FAB 2.0).DesignLongitudinal study.SettingCommunity.ParticipantsThree samples of working-age (21-66) adults (N=1006): (1) unable to work because of a physical condition (n=375); (2) unable to work because of a mental health condition (n=296); (3) general United States working age sample (n=335).InterventionNA.Main Outcome MeasuresAll samples completed the WD-FAB 2.0; the second administration came 5 days after the first. Construct validity was examined by convergent and divergent correlational analysis using legacy measures. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,1). Standard error of the mean (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC90) were calculated to measure scale precision and sensitivity.ResultsPhysical function ICCs ranged from 0.69 to 0.77 in the general sample, and 0.66 to 0.86 in the disability sample. Mental health function scales ICCs ranged from 0.62 to 0.73 in the general sample, and 0.74 to 0.76 in the disability sample. SEMs for all scales indicated good discrimination; those for the physical function scales were generally lower than those for the mental health scales. MDC90 values ranged from 3.41 to 10.55. Correlations between all WD-FAB 2.0 scales and legacy measures were in the expected direction.ConclusionsThe study provides substantial support for the reliability and construct validity of the WD-FAB 2.0 among 3 diverse samples. Although initially developed for use within the Social Security Administration (SSA), these results suggest that the WD-FAB 2.0 could be used for assessment and measurement of work-related physical and mental health function in other contexts as well. 相似文献
10.
Nasrin Salehi Dehno Fahimeh Kamali Abdolhamid Shariat Shapour Jaberzadeh 《Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation》2021,102(5):914-924
ObjectivesTo investigate whether unilateral strength training helps improve cortical excitability and clinical outcomes after stroke.DesignRandomized controlled trial.SettingRehabilitation sciences research center.ParticipantsPatients with subacute stroke (N=26) were randomly assigned to a control group (n=13) or the experimental group (n=13).InterventionsParticipants in both groups received conventional physiotherapy. The experimental group also received unilateral strength training of the less affected wrist extensors. Interventions were applied for 4 weeks (12 sessions, 3 d/wk).Main Outcome MeasuresCortical excitability in both the ipsilesional hemisphere (ipsiH) and contralesional hemisphere (contraH) was assessed by measuring resting motor threshold (RMT), active motor threshold (AMT), motor evoked potential (MEP), and cortical silent period (CSP) at baseline and after the 4-week intervention period. Clinical outcomes were obtained by evaluating wrist extension strength in both the more affected and less affected hands, upper extremity motor function, activities of daily living (ADL), and spasticity.ResultsThe experimental group showed greater MEP amplitude (P=.001) in the ipsiH and shorter CSP duration in both the ipsiH (P=.042) and contraH (P=.038) compared with the control group. However, the reductions in RMT and AMT in both hemispheres were not significantly different between groups. Improvements in wrist extension strength in the more affected (P=.029) and less affected (P=.001) hand, upper extremity motor function (P=.04), and spasticity (P=.014) were greater in the experimental group. No significant difference in ADLs was detected between groups.ConclusionsA combination of unilateral strength training and conventional physiotherapy appears to be a beneficial therapeutic modality for improving cortical excitability and some clinical outcomes in patients with stroke. 相似文献