Comparison of Office,Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Heart Transplant Recipients

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the relationship between office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in heart transplant recipients.Methods and ResultsThe study enrolled 30 adults ≥6 months after heart transplantation. Morning seated office BP was measured with the use of an automatic device at 3 outpatient visits. Seated home BP was measured in the morning and evening for 5 consecutive days. Ambulatory BP was measured over 24 hours with the use of a Spacelabs monitor. The strongest correlation was observed between home and 24-hour ambulatory BP (r = 0.79 systolic; r = 0.72 diastolic). Office and home systolic BPs were significantly lower than daytime ambulatory BP (office, −3.7 mm Hg, P = .009; home, −2.6 mm Hg, P = .05). Ambulatory monitoring identified more participants with BP above hypertensive limits than did office or home measurements (63%, 50%, and 13%, respectively; P = .003). Ambulatory monitoring also revealed high BP loads, abnormal nocturnal BP patterns (eg, 30% nondippers), and a high percentage of masked hypertension (37% home, 50% ambulatory).ConclusionsOffice and home BP monitoring are acceptable but may underestimate BP burden in heart transplant recipients. Additional studies are needed to determine which BP method is superior for the management of hypertension and associated outcomes after heart transplantation.     

Difference in 24‐hour urine sodium excretion between controlled and uncontrolled patients on antihypertensive drug treatment

The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between sodium intake and blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive patients taking antihypertensive medications by using 24‐hour urine collection and 24‐hour ambulatory BP. This is a cross‐sectional community‐based study and conducted in 2011 and 2012. A total of 1128 participants were recruited from five cities in Korea. Among them, 740 participants who had complete 24‐hour urine collection and valid 24‐hour ambulatory BP data were included in this study. Participants were divided into four groups: normotensives (NT, n = 441), untreated hypertensive patients (UTHT, n = 174), controlled hypertensive patients (CHT, n = 62), and uncontrolled hypertensive patients (UCHT, n = 63). UCHT and CHT groups showed higher mean age than NT and UTHT groups. UCHT and UTHT groups showed higher 24‐hour systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) than NT and CHT groups. UCHT group had the highest level of 24‐hour urine sodium. Multivariate analysis adjusted with age, gender, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and use of diuretics showed higher level of 24‐hour urine sodium in UCHT group than that in CHT group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed independent association of the amount of 24‐hour urine sodium with uncontrolled BP in hypertensive patients on antihypertensive drug treatment. Higher level of 24‐hour urine sodium excretion in uncontrolled hypertensive patients suggests that excessive sodium intake could be associated with blunted BP lowering efficacy of antihypertensive medications.     

Catheter-based renal denervation in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease and uncontrolled hypertension

Sympathetic activation contributes to the progression of hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Ablation of renal sympathetic nerves lowers blood pressure (BP) and preserves renal function in patients with CKD and uncontrolled hypertension by reducing sympathetic nerve activity. But whether this approach is safe and effective in Chinese patients with CKD is unknown. We performed an observational study of eight patients with CKD stages from 1 to 5, office BP ≥150/90 mmHg, while on at least three antihypertensive drug classes including a diuretic, and diagnosis confirmed by 24 h ambulatory systolic BP measurement ≥135 mmHg. All patients underwent catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) using a newly designed RDN System (Golden Leaf Medtech, Shanghai, China). For up to 6 months after RDN, BP was monitored and renal function was assessed. Mean baseline office BP was 165.0 ± 13.9/97.8 ± 5.5 mmHg, despite treatment with three antihypertensive drugs. Six months after RDN, office BP was reduced by 22.1 ± 12.0 (P = .002)/11.0 ± 8.8 mmHg (P = .012) and average 24 h ambulatory BP by 18 ± 13.7 (P = .01)/9.3 ± 7.7 mmHg (P = .016). After RDN, heart rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) had no significant change compared with before RDN. In Chinese patients with CKD, our observational pilot study found that treating hypertension with RDN lowers BP while not affecting renal function. Brief Abstract: We performed RDN in eight Chinese patients with hypertension and CKD. The results showed that RDN lowered blood pressure of these patients significantly and eGFR was stable. No obvious adverse event was observed.     

Does the antihypertensive response to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition predict the antihypertensive response to angiotensin receptor antagonism?

To test the hypothesis that the antihypertensive response to angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition can predict the response to angiotensin II type I receptor (AT₁R) antagonism, 33 hypertensive patients were randomized to receive lisinopril (20 mg) or losartan (50 mg) for 5 weeks. Patients were then crossed-over to the alternative treatment for a second 5-week period. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP (ABP) was measured before randomization and on the final day of each period. The agreement in ABP response between the two drugs was assessed using the following approaches: Subjects were classified as responders and nonresponders using as a threshold an arbitrary level of response (ABP fall ≥ 10 mm Hg systolic or ≥ 5 mm Hg diastolic) or the median ABP response achieved by each of the drugs. Disagreement between the two drugs in the responders-nonresponders classification was expressed as the proportion of subjects whose ABP responded to one of the drugs only. Lisinopril was more effective than losartan in reducing ABP (mean difference 4.7 ± 8.1/3.3 ± 5.7 mm Hg, systolic/diastolic, P < .05). Disagreement in the antihypertensive response between the two drugs was found in 39%/33% of subjects for systolic/diastolic ABP using the arbitrary response criterion (33%/39% using the median response criterion). Significant correlations were found between the responses to lisinopril and losartan (r = 0.47/0.59, systolic/diastolic, P < .01). We conclude that in more than one third of hypertensive subjects, the BP response to ACE inhibition fails to predict the response to AT₁ R antagonism and vice versa. These data suggest that there are differences between these two drug classes that are not only of theoretical but also of practical significance.     

Évaluation par l’automesure au domicile de l’efficacité de monothérapies antihypertensives chez des hypertendus traités en France

ObjectiveTo evaluate the blood pressure (BP) control and the efficacy of antihypertensive monotherapy using home BP self-measurement in a French population of treated hypertensive subjects in 2007 2009 and 2010.MethodsThe French League Against Hypertension Surveys (FLAHS) are conducted among a representative sample of individuals aged 35 years and older living in France. For the 2007, 2009 and 2010 surveys, a sample of 1467 subjects who owned a BP self-measurement device and performed three consecutive morning BP measurements were included. Among the 60% of subjects who reported taking at least one antihypertensive drug, we analyzed subjects treated with one of the following antihypertensive monotherapy, i.e., beta-blocker (BB), ACE inhibitors, calcium channel blocker (CCB) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB).ResultsAmong treated hypertensive subjects (n = 886), 66% (n = 586) had home BP below the 140/90 mmHg threshold and 50% (n = 449) below 135/85 mmHg. Three hundred two subjects were treated with a single antihypertensive drug, 33% had ARB, 25% BB, 19% CCB and 13% ACE inhibitors. Age (years) for each treatment group is different (P < 0.01) CCB (72.1 ± 9.3), BB (65.6 ± 9.8), ARB (68.6 ± 8.9) and ACEI (67.3 ± 10.2). The mean systolic/diastolic BP (mmHg) is not comparable between monotherapy 130.7/76.1 (ARB), 130.7/78.7 (BB), 134.0/75.2 (CCB) and 139.1/80.3 (ACEI) for ARB, BB, CCB and ACE inhibitors respectively. Compared to ACE inhibitors, BP was significantly lower with ARB (P < 0.01). The proportion of subjects with a BP below 140/90 mmHg was 73% for ARB, 52% for BB, 68% for CCB and 47% for ACE with a statistical significance (P = 0.03) for ARB vs. ACEI and CCB vs. ACEI.ConclusionAmong subjects treated for hypertension who owned a BP self-measurement device, 50 to 66% had a controlled BP (depending on the threshold used). It is observed differences between antihypertensive efficacy of monotherapy with a larger number of patients controlled with ARB or CCB.     

Additional Antihypertensive Effect of Drugs in Hypertensive Subjects Uncontrolled on Diltiazem Monotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Office and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring

The purpose of this study was to compare several diltiazem-based antihypertensive drug combinations and assess the usefulness of home blood pressure monitoring in the evaluation of the efficacy of combination pharmacotherapy. Sixteen general practitioners recruited hypertensive subjects uncontrolled on diltiazem monotherapy, who were randomized to receive eight weeks of add-on therapy with a diuretic (chlorthalidone), a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist (felodipine), an ACE inhibitor (lisinopril), or an angiotensin blocker (valsartan). Sitting office and home blood pressure was measured using electronic devices A&D 767. A total of 211 patients were randomized, and 185 completed the study. Of 52 subjects randomized to felodipine, 15 were withdrawn due to ankle edema. The additional antihypertensive effect of the second drug was smaller in 18 subjects with a white coat effect (p < 0.01). All combinations produced a significant decline in office (21.2 ± 14.8 / 7.7 ± 9.7 mmHg) and home (17.1 ± 11.9 / 6.0 ± 7.0) blood pressure (systolic / diastolic, p < 0.001). There were no differences in the efficacy of the four combinations assessed using office or home blood pressure monitoring. These data suggest that diuretics, dihydropyridines, ACE inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers provide significant additional antihypertensive effects in hypertensive patients uncontrolled on diltiazem monotherapy. The diltiazem-dihydropyridine combination is often intolerable because of ankle edema. Home blood pressure monitoring is useful in the assessment of the efficacy of combination pharmacotherapy and also allows for the detection of subjects who do not require treatment intensification.     

Daytime Systolic Ambulatory Blood Pressure With a Direct Switch Between Candesartan Monotherapy and the Fixed‐Dose Combination Olmesartan/Amlodipine in Patients With Uncontrolled Essential Hypertension (SEVICONTROL‐1)

A direct switch of candesartan to the fixed‐dose combination olmesartan/amlodipine in uncontrolled hypertension is a frequent clinical requirement but is not covered by current labeling. An open‐label, prospective, single‐arm phase IIIb study was performed in patients with 32 mg candesartan followed by olmesartan/amlodipine 40/10 mg. The primary endpoint was change in mean daytime systolic blood pressure (BP). Mean daytime systolic BP was reduced by 9.2±12.6 mm Hg (P<.0001) after substituting candesartan for olmesartan/amlodipine (baseline BP 140.2±9.7 mm Hg). The reduction in office BP was 9.4±18.4/4.0±9.6 mm Hg; P<.002). Overall, 61.3% of patients achieved a target BP <140/90 mm Hg using office BP and <135/85 mm Hg using ambulatory BP measurement. There were 8 adverse events with a possible relation to study drug and 1 unrelated serious adverse events. In conclusion, patients with uncontrolled moderate arterial hypertension being treated using candesartan monotherapy achieve a further reduction of BP when switched directly to a fixed‐dose combination of olmesartan 40 mg/amlodipine 10 mg.     

Treated hypertension and the white coat phenomenon: Office readings are inadequate measures of efficacy

To better define the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and to estimate the magnitude of white coat effect (WCE), before and after antihypertensive therapy, we gathered data from an open-label forced-titration study of a combination of antihypertensive drugs that was titrated sequentially, in the order amlodipine, olmesartan, and hydrochlorothiazide, over an 18-week period among 187 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. WCH was defined as daytime ambulatory blood pressure (BP) of 135/85 mm Hg or less, but clinic BP of 140/90 mm Hg or more. WCE was obtained as the mean difference between clinic and daytime ambulatory BP. At baseline, the prevalence of WCH was 12%; all but one subject had WCE of >10/5 mm Hg. After treatment, the prevalence of WCH had increased to 39% (P < .001). In the overall population, at baseline, the mean (±SD) WCE for systolic BP was 10.4 ± 10.9 mm Hg and 3.7 ± 8.6 mm Hg for diastolic BP. After treatment, the reduction in systolic WCE was 3.01 ± 0.93 (SE; P < .0001); no reduction was seen for diastolic WCE. Among patients treated with amlodipine-olmesartan combination, WCE at baseline was 11 mm Hg systolic and was attenuated to -0.9 mm Hg. Among patients treated with amlodipine-olmesartan-hydrochlorothiazide combination, systolic WCE was similar at baseline (10.1 mm Hg) and at end of therapy (8.1 mm Hg). Mean systolic difference between dual and triple therapy of 9.9 mm Hg, SE 2.98 was significant (P < .001). The drop in diastolic WCE from 6.4 with dual therapy to -1.2 with triple therapy was also significant (mean difference 7.6, SE 2.2; P < .001). In conclusion, the prevalence of WCH increases three-fold with treatment as a result of fewer patients having sustained hypertension. Thus, out-of-office BP monitoring especially among treated hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes is necessary to provide better assessment of overall BP and response to treatment.     

Registry of the Egyptian specialized hypertension clinics: Sex‐related differences in clinical characteristics and hypertension management among low socioeconomic hypertensive patients

Hypertension is a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) which is a leading cause of death in developing countries affecting both genders. Gender dissimilarity in clinical characteristics and hypertension (HTN) management among hypertensive patients has been reported in several reports before. The aim was to detect sex differences in clinical characteristics and HTN management among Egyptian hypertensive patients. Data from 4701 hypertensive patients attending 9 university located Specialized Hypertension clinic (SHC) were collected from October 2014 to September 2017. The collected data included demographics, cardiovascular risk profile, hypertension‐related history, anthropometric and blood pressure (BP) measurements, antihypertensive medications used, number of patients attending the follow‐up visits, and HTN control rate. Females represented 58.5% of the recruited patients, they were younger, with higher BMI, lower education level, and employment rate compared with males. Females had lower mean office systolic and diastolic BP than males (144.2 ± 22.6 vs. 146.5 ± 22.0 mmHg and 88.1 ± 13.0 vs. 89.9 ± 12.6 mmHg, respectively) and lower rate of uncontrolled BP (54.8% vs. 61.1% in males P < .001). Antihypertensive drugs were comparable among both sexes except for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors which were more prescribed in males. Compliance to antihypertensive medications was better in females (63.6% vs. 60.1% in males, P = .015). To conclude, Egyptian hypertensive females have different clinical characteristics as compared to their counterpart males with better BP control, adherence to antihypertensive medications, lower systolic and diastolic BP, and no major differences in the prescribed antihypertensive distribution.     

Self‐blood pressure monitoring is associated with improved awareness,adherence, and attainment of target blood pressure goals: Prospective observational study of 7751 patients

We investigated whether self‐blood pressure monitoring (SBPM) can improve the control rate of blood pressure (BP), adherence of antihypertensive medications, and the awareness of the importance of BP control in hypertensive patients. A total of 7751 patients who visited the outpatient clinics of private and university hospitals in Korea were given automatic electronic BP monitors and were recommended to measure their BP daily at home for 3 months. Changes in office BP, attainment of target BP, adherence to taking antihypertensive drugs, and awareness of BP were compared before and after SBPM. Patients and physicians were surveyed on their perception of BP and SBPM. Mean BP significantly decreased from 142/88 to 129/80 mm Hg (P < .001), and attainment of the target BP increased from 32% to 59% (P < .001) after SBPM. Drug non‐adherence, which was defined as patient's not taking medication days per week, decreased significantly from 0.86 days to 0.53 days (P < .001). The rate of awareness of the BP goal increased from 57% to 81% (P < .001). Patients estimated that their mean BP was 125/81 mm Hg, but their actual mean BP was 142/88 mm Hg. Awareness about the importance of SBPM increased from 90% to 98%. The rate of SBPM ≥ once per week further increased, from 34% to 96%. In conclusion, SBPM is associated with reduced BP, better BP control rate, greater drug adherence, and improved perception of BP by the patients.     

A Hypertensive Response to Exercise Is Prominent in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Hypertension: A Controlled Study

Blood pressure (BP) behavior during exercise is not clear in hypertensive patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The authors studied 57 men with newly diagnosed essential hypertension and untreated OSA (apnea‐hypopnea index [AHI] ≥5) but without daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score ≤10), and an equal number of hypertensive controls without OSA matched for age, body mass index, and office systolic BP. All patients underwent ambulatory BP measurements, transthoracic echocardiography, and exercise treadmill testing according to the Bruce protocol. A hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) was defined as peak systolic BP ≥210 mm Hg. Patients with OSA and control patients had similar ambulatory and resting BP, ejection fraction, and left ventricular mass. Peak systolic BP was significantly higher in patients with OSA (197.6±25.6 mm Hg vs 187.8±23.6 mm Hg; P=.03), while peak diastolic BP and heart rate did not differ between groups. Furthermore, an HRE was more prevalent in patients with OSA (44% vs 19%; P=.009). Multiple logistic regression revealed that an HRE is independently predicted by both the logAHI and minimum oxygen saturation during sleep (odds ratio, 3.94; confidence interval, 1.69–9.18; P=.001 and odds ratio, 0.94; confidence interval, 0.89–0.99; P=.02, respectively). Exaggerated BP response is more prevalent in nonsleepy hypertensives with OSA compared with their nonapneic counterparts. This finding may have distinct diagnostic and prognostic implications.     

Automated office blood pressure is in agreement with awake and mean 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure at the lower blood pressure range

Automated office blood pressure measurement eliminates the white coat effect and is associated with awake ambulatory blood pressure. This study examined whether automated office blood pressure values at lower limits were comparable to those of awake and mean 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure. A total of 552 patients were included in the study, involving 293 (53.1%) men and 259 (46.9%) women, with a mean age 55.0 ± 12.5, of whom 36% were treated for hypertension. Both systolic and diastolic automated office blood pressures exhibited lower values compared to awake ambulatory blood pressure among 254 individuals with systolic automated office blood pressure <130 mm Hg (119 ± 8 mm Hg vs 125 ± 11 mm Hg, P < .0001 and 75 ± 9 mm Hg vs 79 ± 9 mm Hg, P < .0001 for systolic and diastolic BPs, respectively). Furthermore, the comparison of systolic automated office blood pressure to the mean 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure levels also showed lower values (119 ± 8 vs 121 ± 10, P = .007), whereas the diastolic automated office blood pressure measurements were similar to 24‐hour ambulatory blood pressure values. Our findings show that when automated office blood pressure readings express values <130/80 mm Hg in repeated office visits, further investigation should be performed only when masked hypertension is suspected; otherwise, higher automated office blood pressure values could be used for the diagnosis of uncontrolled hypertension, especially in individuals with organ damage.     

Role of Aliskiren on Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Function in Patients With Primary Hypertension

Arterial stiffness and endothelial dysfunction are important determinants of cardiovascular events in patients with arterial hypertension. There are few data regarding the role of aliskiren on the central hemodynamics and endothelial function in patients with uncontrolled arterial hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess the addition of aliskiren to other antihypertensive drug treatment for arterial stiffness and endothelial function. Thirty uncontrolled hypertensive patients (mean age, 60.4±12.2 years), without any other cardiovascular risk factors, were enrolled. Augmentation index (AIx) and carotid‐femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) by applanation tonometry and reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH PAT) index using peripheral arterious tonometry at baseline and after 6 months of aliskiren titrated to 300 mg once a day was evaluated. The addition of aliskiren had no effect on values of central AIx (33.26±10.74% vs 28.86±10.74%; P=.36) but did significantly improve values of cfPWV (9.36±2.65 m/s vs 8.72±2.48 m/s; P=.04) and RH PAT index (1.64±0.57 vs 1.75±0.45; P=.05). In addition to improving systolic and diastolic blood pressure, the addition of aliskiren to concomitant antihypertensive drugs in uncontrolled hypertensive patients may be effective in improving aortic stiffness and endothelial function. These results encourage further studies to evaluate the use of aliskiren for cardiovascular prevention.     

Predictors of Uncontrolled Blood Pressure in Treated Hypertensive Individuals: First Population‐Based Study in Lebanon

Arterial hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke. This study aimed to assess the predictors of uncontrolled systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in Lebanon among treated hypertensive individuals. The authors included 562 participants 40 years and older. The potential predictors included sociodemographic characteristics, self‐reported health information, and medication adherence. Prevalence of uncontrolled systolic and diastolic BP reached 43.1% and 24.9%, respectively. Independent predictors of uncontrolled systolic BP were older age, male sex, and low and medium medication adherence level. Predictors of uncontrolled diastolic BP were younger age, obesity, and low medication adherence level. Married individuals and patients taking statins had better diastolic BP control. Uncontrolled BP is a major public health problem in Lebanon. The authors identified low adherence as a major modifiable risk factor for systolic and diastolic BP control and obesity as a major modifiable risk factor for diastolic BP control.     

Sex difference in sympathetic nervous system activity and blood pressure in hypertensive patients

Increased sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity leads to increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study investigated whether there were sex differences in SNS activity among Chinese patients with hypertension. Ethnic Chinese non‐diabetic hypertensive patients aged 20–50 years were enrolled in Taiwan. A total of 970 hypertensive patients (41.0 ± 7.2 years) completed the study, 664 men and 306 women. They received comprehensive evaluations including office blood pressure (BP) measurement, 24‐h ambulatory BP monitoring, and 24‐h urine sampling assayed for catecholamine excretion. Compared to women, men were younger, had higher body mass index (BMI), office systolic BP (SBP), office diastolic BP (DBP), 24‐h ambulatory BP, and 24‐h urine catecholamine excretion. In men, 24‐h urine total catecholamine levels were correlated with 24‐h SBP (r = 0.103, p = .008) and 24‐h DBP (r = 0.083, p = .033). In women, however, there was no correlation between 24‐h urine total catecholamine levels and 24‐h ambulatory BP. Multivariate linear regression indicated that being male (β = 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01–3.29, p = .048) and 24‐h urine total catecholamine (β = 5.03, 95% CI 0.62–9.44, p = .025) were both independently associated with 24‐h SBP; being male was independently associated with 24‐h DBP (β = 3.55, 95% CI 2.26–4.85, p < .001). In conclusion, Chinese men with hypertension had higher SNS activity than women, and SNS activity was independently associated with 24‐h ambulatory BP in men rather than in women. These findings suggest that different hypertensive treatment strategies should be considered according to patient sex.     

Effectiveness of the selective aldosterone blocker,eplerenone, in patients with resistant hypertension

Resistant hypertension is defined as uncontrolled hypertension despite intensive treatment with at least three antihypertensive agents, one of which ideally should be a diuretic. To determine the efficacy and safety of the selective aldosterone antagonist eplerenone in this population, we studied patients with resistant hypertension (clinic blood pressure [BP] >140 mm Hg systolic or >90 mm Hg diastolic on maximal doses of more than three antihypertensive agents, including a loop or thiazide diuretic). At baseline and after 12 weeks of eplerenone therapy (50 to 100 mg daily titrated to effect), patients underwent clinic and 24-hour BP measurements, serum potassium, plasma renin activity, and serum aldosterone measurements. Patients (n = 52) completing the trial averaged 62 ± 10 years of age, were overweight (mean body mass index, 32.1 ± 5.5 kg/m²), and had variable renal function (glomerular filtration rate, 106 ± 38 mL/minute); 70% were men and 74% were non-Black. The mean number of antihypertensive agents at baseline was 3.7 ± 0.8 (range, three to seven drugs) to achieve a clinic BP of 150.5/84.1 mm Hg. The mean serum aldosterone was 12.9 ± 7.6 ng/mL and plasma renin activity was 2.3 ± 2.7 ng/mL/hour. After eplerenone, the change from baseline in the clinic BP was −17.6/−7.9 mm Hg (P < .0001 for both systolic blood pressure [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) and in 24-hour BP was −12.2/−6.0 mm Hg (P < .0001 for both). The number of antihypertensive drugs decreased to 3.3 ± 0.9 (range, one to seven agents). Plasma potassium increased by 0.30 ± 0.45 mEq/L (P < .001), but there were only three instances in two patients of mild hyperkalemia (potassium >5.5 mEq/L, but <6.0 mEq/L), despite all patients being on a background therapy that included an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. Reductions in clinic and ambulatory BP were related to baseline clinic and ambulatory BP values (r² > 0.3 for both SBP and DBP, P < .0001), weakly related to baseline serum aldosterone (r = −0.30; P = .05), and unrelated to plasma renin activity, age, gender, or race. In conclusion, eplerenone demonstrated substantial efficacy in treatment-resistant hypertension and was well-tolerated with modest changes in plasma potassium. Serum aldosterone and plasma renin activity did not predict BP responses to eplerenone in this population.     

Influence of Nighttime Blood Pressure on Left Atrial Size in Uncomplicated Arterial Systemic Hypertension

The aim of the study was to determine the relations of 24-h blood pressure (BP) and its different phases with left atrial size. A total of 130 subjects (mean age 46 years) not taking cardiac drugs were studied by M-mode and Doppler echocardiography and ambulatory BP recording. Subjects (excluding those with coronary artery or valvular heart disease, heart failure, or diabetes) were classified into two groups: 25 normotensives and 105 hypertensives (history of antihypertensive treatment and office diastolic BP > 90 mm Hg). The two groups were comparable in terms of sex, age, and heart rate, whereas body mass index, (P < .01), office BP, average 24-h BP, and average daytime and nighttime BP (all P < .00001) were higher in hypertensives. Hypertensives also had increased left atrial dimension, left atrial dimension/aortic root ratio (both P < .001), and left ventricular mass (LV) indexed for height (P < .0001). Positive correlations of left atrial dimension were found with office BP, average 24-h, average daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic BP, LV mass index, and Doppler-derived E/A ratio. In a multivariate model that included potentially confounding factors, only body mass index (standardized β coefficient = 0.41, P < .00001), average nighttime diastolic BP (β = 0.33, P < .00001), and male sex (β = 0.18, P < .01) were independent predictors of left atrial size in the pooled population. In conclusion, left atrial size is more closely related to ambulatory, rather than office, BP measurements, and high average nighttime BP is a powerful marker of left atrial enlargement in arterial hypertension.     

Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients without and with blood pressure control: data from the PAMELA population. Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni

Previous studies have shown that in the population, only a minority of treated hypertensive patients achieve blood pressure (BP) control. Whether and to what extent this inadequate control has reflection on hypertension-related organ damage has never been systematically examined. In 2051 subjects belonging to the PAMELA (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni) Study population, we measured office, home, and 24-hour ambulatory BP values, together with echocardiographic left ventricular mass and wall thickness. Based on the fraction on antihypertensive treatment and on measurements of increased or normal office, home, or 24-hour ambulatory BP values, subjects were classified as normotensives, untreated hypertensives, treated hypertensives with inadequate BP control, and treated hypertensives with effective BP control. Compared with values in the normotensive group, left ventricular mass index, left ventricular wall thickness, and prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy were markedly increased not only in untreated hypertensive patients but also in treated hypertensives with inadequate BP control. Echocardiographic abnormalities were less in treated hypertensives with BP control than in patients with inadequate BP control, but values were still clearly greater than in normotensive subjects. This was the case regardless whether BP control was assessed by office, home, and/or ambulatory values. Our data provide evidence that in the hypertensive fraction of the population, cardiac structural alterations can be frequently found in both the presence and absence of antihypertensive treatment. They also imply that even effective treatment of hypertension does not allow complete reversal of the cardiac organ damage characterizing high BP states.     

Long-term Antihypertensive Efficacy of Losartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Combination Therapy on Home Blood Pressure Control

Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination therapy has been shown to produce a prompt reduction in clinic blood pressure (BP) without serious adverse effects; however, long-term antihypertensive efficacy on home BP has not been fully investigated. In this open-label multicenter observational study, a total of 151 hypertensive patients uncontrolled with antihypertensive regimens including standard dose of ARBs were switched to the fixed-dose combination of losartan (50 mg)/HCTZ (12.5 mg) (mean age 66.9 ± 9.5 years, 51% male, 19% with diabetes mellitus, and 57% with dyslipidemia). After 3 months, losartan/HCTZ treatment significantly reduced mean home systolic BP/diastolic BP from a baseline level of 153 ± 11/85 ± 9 mm Hg to 136 ± 12/77 ± 10 mm Hg (P < .001) and mean clinic BP from 158 ± 9/87 ± 9 to 136 ± 12/77 ± 10 (P < .001), which were maintained through the study period of 12 months (132 ± 11/75 ± 9 and 136 ± 12/77 ± 10; home and clinic BP at 12 months, respectively, P < .001). Furthermore, younger patients (<65 years) receiving ARB monotherapy at the start of the study showed a significantly greater reduction in home BP, but not in clinic BP, compared with elderly patients (≥65 years). In conclusion, losartan/HCTZ combination therapy exerted a 1-year long-term efficacy on home BP as well as clinic BP. In patients uncontrolled with ARB monotherapy, the antihypertensive efficacy on home BP is more pronounced in younger patients compared with that in elderly patients.     

Add‐On Use of Eplerenone Is Effective for Lowering Home and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Drug‐Resistant Hypertension

The authors aimed to investigate the blood pressure (BP)–lowering ability of eplerenone in drug‐resistant hypertensive patients. A total of 57 drug‐resistant hypertensive patients whose home BP was ≥135/85 mm Hg were investigated. The patients were randomized to either an eplerenone group or a control group and followed for 12 weeks. The efficacy was evaluated by clinic, home, and ambulatory BP monitoring. Urinary albumin, pulse wave velocity, and flow‐mediated vasodilation (FMD) were also evaluated. Home morning systolic BP (148±15 vs 140±15 mm Hg) and evening systolic BP (137±16 vs 130±16 mm Hg) were significantly lowered in the eplerenone group (n=35) compared with baseline (both P<.05), while unchanged in the control group (n=22). BP reductions in the eplerenone group were most pronounced for ambulatory awake systolic BP (P=.04), awake diastolic BP (P=.004), and 24‐hour diastolic BP (P=.02). FMD was significantly improved in the eplerenone group. In patients with drug‐resistant hypertension, add‐on use of eplerenone was effective in lowering BP, especially home and ambulatory awake BP.