Coronary artery calcium score and CT angiography in asymptomatic elderly patients with high pretest probability for coronary artery disease

Purpose

To evaluate the role of coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) and/or coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in asymptomatic elderly patients with high pretest probability for coronary artery disease (CAD).

Materials and methods

Forty-eight consecutive asymptomatic elderly (>65 years) subjects who had a high pretest probability and underwent CACS/CCTA were included. Each CCTA was evaluated for adequacy for assessment of coronary stenosis. Significant stenosis (>50 % diameter narrowing) was assessed on evaluable CT images and by invasive catheter angiography (ICA).

Results

All subjects were men with mean CACS of 880 ± 1779. Among those with low (0–99), intermediate (100–399), and high (400–999) CACS, ICA-verified significant stenosis was present in 8 % (1/13), 23 % (2/13), and 67 % (8/12), respectively. Among those with very high CACS (≥1000) (n = 10), 90 % of CCTAs were not evaluable for stenosis.

Conclusion

In asymptomatic elderly subjects with high pretest probability, CACS followed by CCTA may be considered for those with intermediate to high CACS.

     

Coronary calcium score and computed tomography coronary angiography in high-risk asymptomatic subjects: assessment of diagnostic accuracy and prevalence of non-obstructive coronary artery disease

Objectives

The aim of the study was to compare the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for the assessment of non-obstructive/obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in high-risk asymptomatic subjects.

Methods

Two hundred and thirteen consecutive asymptomatic subjects (113 male; mean age 53.6?±?12.4 years) with more than one risk factor and an inconclusive or unfeasible non-invasive stress test result underwent CACS and CTCA in an outpatient setting. All patients underwent conventional coronary angiography (CAG). Data from CACS (threshold for positive image: Agatston score 1/100/1,000) and CTCA were compared with CAG regarding the degree of CAD (non-obstructive/obstructive; </≥50% lumen reduction).

Results

The mean calcium score was 151?±?403 and the prevalence of obstructive CAD was 17% (8% one-vessel and 10% two-vessel disease). Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CACS were: 97%, 75%, 45%, and 100%, respectively (Agatston?≥1); 73%, 90%, 60%, and 94%, respectively (Agatston?≥100); 30%, 98%, 79%, and 87%, respectively (Agatston?≥1,000). Per-patient values for CTCA were 100%, 98%, 97%, and 100%, respectively (p?<?0.05). CTCA detected 65% prevalence of all CAD (48% non-obstructive), while CACS detected 37% prevalence of all CAD (21% non-obstructive) (p?<?0.05).

Conclusion

CACS proved inadequate for the detection of obstructive and non-obstructive CAD compared with CTCA. CTCA has a high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of non-obstructive and obstructive CAD in high-risk asymptomatic patients with inconclusive or unfeasible stress test results.     

Calcium begets calcium: progression of coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic subjects

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that the rate of coronary artery calcium progression is sex specific, namely, that it is greater in men than in women, and that it is age related, particularly in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of the progression of coronary artery calcium in 217 consecutive asymptomatic subjects who underwent at least two electron-beam computed tomographic studies of the heart. Calcium in the distribution of the epicardial arteries was quantified by using both the conventional coronary artery calcium score (CCS) and the calcium volume score (CVS). Linear regression models were used to judge the joint influence of various risk factors, including sex and age, on rates of coronary artery calcium progression. RESULTS: This study included 103 women and 114 men. The mean interval between the subjects' first and last studies was 25 months +/- 11 (SD). Regression analyses clearly demonstrated that the amount of coronary artery calcium present at the initial study was the most important determinant of calcium progression. This was true when coronary artery calcium was quantified by using the conventional CCS (P <.001) or CVS (P <.001). Neither sex nor age was a significant predictor of coronary artery calcium progression. Among traditional risk factors, only hypertension (P =.02) and diabetes (P =.01) were significant independent factors for calcium progression. CONCLUSION: In asymptomatic subjects, the initial CCS and CVS were the most important factors that affected rate of coronary artery calcium progression. Neither age nor sex was as important as these factors in determination of coronary artery calcium progression.     

Coronary artery calcium scoring vs. coronary CT angiography for the assessment of occupationally significant coronary artery disease

BackgroundExisting pathways for investigating coronary artery disease (CAD) in individuals undertaking high-hazard employment are currently guided by coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) or coronary CT angiography (CTA). The optimal pathway has not been established.AimTo compare the diagnostic outcome and occupational recommendations from two differing investigative pathways for the investigation of CAD in a cohort of high-hazard employees.MethodsWe collected CACS and coronary CTA data from three clinics across two Hospitals on 200 consecutive individuals employed in high-hazard occupations to confirm/exclude occupationally significant CAD. High-hazard occupations were grouped into civil/military pilots and aircraft controllers (n ?= ?106); non-pilot aircrew (NPA) (n ?= ?26); and ground-based (military) personnel (GBP) (n ?= ?52). Demographics, referral indications and recommended occupational outcomes between pathways were compared between groups.ResultsThe CACS pathway led to more than double the number of individuals being returned to partial or full employment, compared with the coronary CTA pathway (OR 2.10, [95%CI 1.54–2.85], P ?< ?0.001). This effect was seen in all sub-groups.Of the 177 subjects that would have been returned to full employment using CACS, 21 (11.9%) would have been occupationally restricted on the basis of significant non-calcified plaque disease using coronary CTA (11.4% pilots/controllers; 19.2% non-pilot aircrew, and 7.7% ground-based personnel).ConclusionUsing CACS to determine the presence of occupational CAD risks returning individuals to roles with occupationally significant CAD that may lead to an unacceptably high likelihood of an incapacitating/distracting acute coronary event. Coronary CTA appears to be a more reliable, non-invasive imaging modality for confirming or excluding occupationally significant CAD in high-hazard employees.     

Coronary artery calcium scoring in low risk patients with family history of coronary heart disease: Validation of the SCCT guideline approach in the coronary artery calcium consortium

BackgroundThe Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) recommends consideration of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring among individuals with a family history (FH) of coronary heart disease (CHD) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk <5%. No dedicated study has examined the prognostic significance of CAC scoring among this population.MethodsThe CAC Consortium is a multi-center observational cohort study from four clinical centers linked to long-term follow-up for cause-specific mortality. All CAC scans were physician referred and performed in patients without a history of CHD. Our analysis includes 14,169 patients with ASCVD scores <5% and self-reported FH of CHD.ResultsThis cohort had a mean age of 48.1 (SD 7.4), was 91.3% white, 47.4% female, had an average ASCVD score of 2.3% (SD 1.3), and 59.4% had a CAC = 0. The event rate for all-cause mortality was 1.2 per 1000 person-years, 0.3 per 1000 person-years for CVD-specific mortality, and 0.2 per 1000 person-years for CHD-specific mortality. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, those with CAC>100 had a 2.2 (95% CI 1.5–3.3) higher risk of all-cause mortality, 4.3 (95% CI 1.9–9.5) times higher risk of CVD-specific mortality, and a 10.4 (95% CI 3.2–33.7) times higher risk of CHD-specific mortality compared to individuals with CAC = 0. The NNS to detect CAC >100 in this sample was 9.ConclusionIn otherwise low risk patients with FH of CHD, CAC>100 were associated with increased risk of all-cause and CHD mortality with event rates in a range that may benefit with preventive pharmacotherapy. These data strongly support new SCCT recommendations regarding testing of patients with a family history of CHD.     

Interscan variation in coronary artery calcium quantification in a large asymptomatic patient population

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated interscan variation in coronary artery calcium scores in a large screening population as determined by electron beam CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One thousand patients (average age, 53 years; age range, 18-85 years) who were asymptomatic for coronary artery disease underwent two consecutive scans of the heart on an electron beam CT scanner. Scans were performed with ECG gating, breath-hold, 3-mm collimation, and 100-msec exposure. Two contiguous pixels with density values greater than 130 H were used as the minimum criterion for a calcific lesion. The calcium score was determined on a vessel-by-vessel basis for both scans of each patient. Interscan variation in calcium and vessels involved with calcification was evaluated on the basis of age, sex, and average calcium score. RESULTS: The percentage of difference between calcium scores in scans was 28.4% and 43.0% for women and men, respectively. For the individual epicardial arteries (left main, left anterior descending, circumflex, and right coronary), the percentage of difference for calcium scores was 20.2-24.2% for women and 30.5-44.9% for men. A difference between the two scans in at least one vessel of the total coronary arteries identified with calcium was noted in 31% of patients. CONCLUSION: Interscan variability in calcium scores may be important in the determination of risk stratification. Subjects with a nonzero calcium score may benefit from undergoing two scans at the time of initial imaging.     

Increased intrathoracic and hepatic visceral adipose tissue independently correlates with coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic patients

Background

Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is associated with cardiac events, but it is not clear which, if any of the various measures of VAT independently correlate with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

We studied 400 patients undergoing computed tomography to determine coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. VAT was measured in the form of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume and thickness, intrathoracic adipose tissue volume (ITAV), and hepatic steatosis.

Results

Of the 400 subjects, the average CAC score was 112.2 ± 389.3. When each measure of VAT (EAT volume and thickness, ITAV, hepatic steatosis) was added to the traditional model (they were independently associated with greater risk of CAC score ≥100 AU as measured by IDI/NRI (P < .05). On univariable logistic regression analysis, each of the 4 measures of VAT showed association with greater risk of a CAC score of ≥100 AU (OR > 1).

Conclusions

Each measure of VAT is a strong correlate of CAC score ≥100 AU in asymptomatic subjects—these VAT assessments correlate more significantly than do traditional CAD risk factors. This incremental power in the predictive models is likely the result of measurement of a fundamental expression of the metabolic syndrome and consequent proatherogenic derangements.     

MRI detects increased coronary wall thickness in asymptomatic individuals: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA)

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of coronary wall MRI as a measure of atherosclerotic disease burden in an asymptomatic population free of clinical cardiovascular disease. Coronary wall magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive method for evaluation of arterial wall remodeling associated with atherosclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Asymptomatic participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) study were studied using black blood MRI. MRI-assessed coronary wall thickness was compared with computed tomography calcium score, carotid intimal-medial thickness, and risk factors for coronary artery disease. RESULTS: Eighty-eight arterial segments were evaluated in 38 MESA participants (mean age, 61.3+/-8.7 years). The maximum coronary wall thickness was greater for participants with two or more cardiovascular risk factors than for those with one or no risk factors (2.59+/-0.33 mm vs. 2.36+/-0.30 mm, respectively, P=0.05.) For participants with zero calcium score, the mean and maximum coronary wall thickness for subjects with two or more risk factors for coronary artery disease were greater than the wall thickness for subjects with one or no risk factors (mean thickness: 1.95+/-0.17 mm vs. 1.7+/-0.19 mm; maximum thickness: 2.67+/-0.24 mm vs. 2.32+/-0.27 mm, respectively, P<0.05). Subjects with increased carotid intimal-medial thickness also had increased coronary artery wall thickness (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Coronary artery wall MRI detects increased coronary wall thickness in asymptomatic individuals with subclinical markers of atherosclerotic disease and in individuals with zero calcium score.     

Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD): Coronary bypass surgery versus coronary angioplasty

With jeopardized viable myocardium in the distributions of the left anterior descending and right coronary arteries, it was decided to perform bypass surgery. Saphenous venous bypass grafts were placed to the left anterior descending, right and obtuse marginal coronary arteries. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged. The case shows how nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging can be a useful adjunct in the clinical decision-making process when coronary anatomy reveals occlusion of one or more arteries associated with severe regional wall motion abnormalities suggesting scar. In this case, if only the angiographic and echocardiographic data had been evaluated, the inferior wall would have been assessed as nonviable and might not have been revascularized. The perfusion imaging, however, clearly defined persistent jeopardized viable myocardium involving the inferior wall as well as in the left anterior descending artery territory. This allowed the patient to have complete revascularization.     

Prevalence of coronary artery disease across the Framingham risk categories: coronary artery calcium scoring and MSCT coronary angiography

Background  Non-invasive assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis by means of coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) and multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography could improve patients’ risk stratification. However, data relating observations on CACS and MSCT coronary angiography to traditional risk assessment are scarce. Methods and Results  In 314 consecutive outpatients (54 ± 13 years, 56% males) without known CAD, CACS and 64-slice MSCT coronary angiography were performed. According to the Framingham risk score (FRS), 51% of patients were at low, 24% at intermediate and 25% at high risk, respectively. MSCT angiograms showing atherosclerosis were classified as showing obstructive (≥50% luminal narrowing) CAD or not. Both CACS and MSCT coronary angiography showed a high prevalence of normal coronary arteries in low FRS patients (70% and 61%, respectively). An increase in the prevalence of CACS >400 (4% low vs 19% intermediate vs 36% high), CAD (39% low vs 79% intermediate vs 91% high), and obstructive CAD (15% low vs 43% intermediate vs 58% high) was observed across the FRS categories (P < .0001 for all comparisons). Conclusions  A strong positive relationship exists between FRS and the prevalence and extent of atherosclerosis. Especially in intermediate FRS patients, CACS and MSCT coronary angiography provide useful information on the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis.