首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 11 毫秒
1.
2.
Epidural steroid injection (ESI) is the most commonly performed intervention in pain clinics across the United States. This article provides an evidence-based review of ESI, including data on efficacy, patient selection, comparison of types, and complications. The data strongly suggest that ESI can provide short-term relief for radicular symptoms but are less compelling for long-term effects or relief of back pain. Although it has been asserted that transforaminal ESIs are more efficacious than interlaminar injections, the evidence supporting this is limited.  相似文献   

3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Chen CP, Wong AM, Hsu C-C, Tsai W-C, Chang C-N, Lin S-C, Huang Y-C, Chang C-H, Tang SF. Ultrasound as a screening tool for proceeding with caudal epidural injections.

Objective

To study the anatomical structure of the sacral hiatus using ultrasound. Based on the sonographic images of the sacral hiatus, the feasibility of caudal epidural injection can then be assessed.

Design

Case-controlled study.

Setting

Rehabilitation outpatient clinic in a tertiary medical center.

Participants

Patients (N=47; 20 women, 27 men) with low back pain and sciatica who were to receive caudal epidural injection treatments were recruited into this study.

Interventions

Sonographic images of the sacral hiatus were obtained from all the patients. An ultrasound machine capable of examining musculoskeletal tissues with real-time linear-array ultrasound transducer was used to measure the distance between the anterior wall and posterior wall of the sacral hiatus (diameter of the sacral hiatus) and the distance between bilateral cornua.

Main Outcome Measures

Diameter of the sacral canal and distance between bilateral cornua measured in millimeters.

Results

The mean diameter of the sacral canal was measured to be 5.3±2.0mm in our recruited patients. The mean distance between bilateral cornua was measured to be 9.7±1.9mm. Caudal epidural injections failed in 7 patients. In these 7 patients, 4 had very small diameter of the sacral canal (1.6, 1.2, 1.4, and 1.5mm). In 1 man, sonographic images revealed a closed sacral hiatus (no sacral canal diameter can be measured). Two patients revealed flow of fresh blood into the syringe while checking for the escape of cerebrospinal fluid after the needles were inserted into the sacral canal. For safety reasons, steroid injections were not performed in these 2 patients.

Conclusions

Ultrasound may be used as an effective screening tool for caudal epidural injections. Anatomic variations of the sacral hiatus can be clearly observed using ultrasound. Sonographic images indicating a closed sacral canal and sacral diameters ranging from 1.2 to 1.6mm may suggest a higher failure rate in caudal epidural injection.  相似文献   

12.
13.
14.
15.
Neurolytic celiac plexus blocks (NCPB) have been performed for many years for the treatment of cancer and some non-cancer pain conditions associated with the upper gastrointestinal tract. The block can provide adequate pain relief from the area of the distal esophagus to the transverse colon, and can be approached from a variety of ways. This is a review of the anatomy, patient selection, technique, medications used, possible complications, and efficacy of the treatment.  相似文献   

16.
17.

Objective

To present an evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of oral pain medication and corticosteroid injections to treat carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Data Sources

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database were searched for relevant systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Study Selection

Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria to select potential studies.

Data Extraction

Two reviewers independently extracted the data on pain (visual analog scale), function or recovery, and assessed the methodologic quality.

Data Synthesis

A best-evidence synthesis was performed to summarize the results of the included studies. Four reviews and 9 RCTs were included. For oral pain medication, strong and moderate evidence was found for the effectiveness of oral steroids versus placebo in the short term. Moderate evidence was found in favor of oral steroids versus splinting in the short term. No evidence was found for the effectiveness of oral steroids in the long term. For corticosteroid injections, strong evidence was found in favor of a corticosteroid injection versus a placebo injection and moderate evidence was found in favor of corticosteroid injection versus oral steroids in the short term. Also, in the short term, moderate evidence was found in favor of a local versus a systematic corticosteroid injection. Higher doses of corticosteroid injections seem to be more effective in the midterm; however, the benefits of corticosteroid injections were not maintained in the long term.

Conclusions

The reviewed evidence supports that oral steroids and corticosteroid injections benefit patient with CTS particularly in the short term. Although a higher dose of steroid injections seems to be more effective in the midterm, the benefits of oral pain medication and corticosteroid injections were not maintained in the long term.  相似文献   

18.
ObjectiveTo compare dual-target injection with standard ultrasound (US)-guided subacromial injection in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) and possible disorders of the biceps long-head tendons.DesignDouble-blind, randomized controlled trial.SettingRehabilitation outpatient clinic.ParticipantsPatients with SIS (N=60).Intervention(1) US-guided standard subacromial bursa; (2) dual-target (subacromial bursa plus proximal biceps long-head tendon) injection, with 40-mg triamcinolone acetonide administered to patients in each group.Main Outcome MeasuresClinical assessments were performed at baseline. The outcomes, including results from a self-administered questionnaire, the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and a self-pain report, the visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at rest, at night, and during overhead activities, were evaluated at baseline and at the first and third months postintervention.ResultsNo significant difference was observed in baseline evaluations between groups (n=30 in each treatment arm) prior to injections. Both groups exhibited significant SPADI and VAS-score improvements after the first month. The dual-target injection group had less rebounding pain at the 3-month follow-up. The standard injection group had more patients reporting worsening pain within 1 day postinjection.ConclusionUS-guided dual-target corticosteroid injection showed similar short-term efficacy to standard subacromial injections, but with an extended duration of symptom relief. Therefore, dual-target corticosteroid injections may be useful for shoulder pain treatment in patients with SIS.  相似文献   

19.
20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号