Risk factors for treatment failures in patients receiving PCR-based preemptive therapy for CMV infection

PCR-based preemptive therapy with ganciclovir has been shown to reduce the incidence of CMV disease after BMT. Failures of this treatment strategy are CMV disease and secondary non-viral infections. Eighty-six consecutive patients at high risk for CMV disease who received PCR-based preemptive therapy with ganciclovir were assessed for treatment failures and possible risk factors. Ganciclovir was initiated in 57 of 86 patients (66%). Only 28 of 86 (32%) patients received 4 or more weeks of ganciclovir. Recurrence of CMV infection after successful treatment was more frequent among recipients of a BMT from an unrelated compared to a sibling donor (P = 0.004). Three (3.5%) patients developed non-fatal early onset CMV disease and seven of 68 (10.3 %) late onset CMV disease (>100 days post transplant). Risk factors for late onset CMV disease were cGVHD (P = 0.0017) and duration of prior antiviral therapy >4 weeks (P = 0. 0073). The incidence of secondary non-viral infections was 28% with the duration of antiviral treatment being a significant risk factor for secondary bacterial (P = 0.0045) and invasive fungal infections (P = 0.006). Thus, PCR-based preemptive treatment with ganciclovir reduces early onset CMV disease, but the duration of antiviral therapy prior to day +100 is a significant risk factor for late onset CMV disease as well as secondary non-viral infections.     

High incidence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infection among lung transplant recipients receiving preemptive therapy.

Preemptive antiviral therapy in transplant patients is thought to be less likely to lead to antiviral resistance than is routine prophylaxis. Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive lung transplant patients (R+) were assigned to receive pp65 antigen-guided ganciclovir therapy, and seronegative recipients of organs from seropositive donors (D+/R-) were assigned to receive initially preemptive and then routine ganciclovir prophylaxis. The incidence of infection with ganciclovir-resistant (ganR) CMV was assessed retrospectively. GanR CMV infection developed in 4 (9%) of 45 patients, at a median of 4.4 months (range, 3.1-6.6 months) after transplantation, and was more common among D+/R- patients than among R+ patients (3 of 11 vs. 1 of 34; P =.04). The incidence among patients who received preemptive therapy was similar to that among patients who received routine prophylaxis. All ganR isolates contained a UL97 mutation. GanR CMV infection occurs in nearly 10% of lung transplant recipients, despite preemptive antiviral therapy, and is more common among D+/R- patients.     

Evaluation of the Murex CMV DNA Hybrid Capture assay (version 2.0) for early diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection in recipients of an allogeneic stem cell transplant

Early diagnosis of CMV infection based on sensitive diagnostic assays has helped to reduce CMV-related mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). In this study, the commercialized Murex CMV DNA Hybrid Capture assay (version 2.0) (HCS) was prospectively compared to an in-house CMV-DNA PCR assay from whole blood in patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Overall, a high concordance between HCS and PCR was documented (kappa = 0.686; n = 385). The HCS assay was found to be as sensitive as the PCR indicating active CMV infection at a median of 35 and 34 days after transplantation, respectively. None of the HCS-negative patients developed CMV-related symptoms (negative predictive value 100%). Declining CMV DNA load in the blood was found to be an indicator for effective antiviral therapy, whereas persistence of a high viral load was associated with fatal CMV disease. In conclusion, the Hybrid Capture CMV DNA assay (v 2.0) allows early diagnosis of CMV infection after allogeneic SCT and assessment of the efficacy of antiviral therapy.     

Effect of a 14-day course of foscarnet on cytomegalovirus (CMV) blood markers in a randomized study of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with persistent CMV viremia. Agence National de Recherche du SIDA 023 Study Group.

A randomized open-label phase 2 trial compared the virological and clinical effects on cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of a 14-day course of intravenous foscarnet (100 mg/[kg x 12 h]) or no treatment in 42 HIV-infected patients with < 100 CD4 cells/mm3 and persistent asymptomatic CMV viremia. All CMV markers (blood culture, pp65 antigenemia, plasma and leukocyte DNA) either became negative or decreased significantly at day 14 in the foscarnet group. CMV blood culture results at day 14 were positive in 14% of those receiving foscarnet versus 60% of control patients (P = .004). However, after the end of treatment, all markers reappeared or the virus load rapidly increased. The probability of CMV disease at 6 months was 43% in both groups. Patients who had or who achieved a negative blood culture at any time had a reduced risk of CMV disease (RR = 2.64; 95% CI = 1.24-5.62; P = .02). This study suggests that sequential courses of intravenous foscarnet might not be a good strategy for preemptive therapy in this population and that in patients with a positive blood marker, treatment able to induce and maintain negative CMV blood cultures could constitute an effective intervention.     

Intensive strategy to prevent CMV disease in seropositive umbilical cord blood transplant recipients

Seropositive umbilical cord blood transplant (UCBT) recipients are at increased risk for CMV complications. To reduce CMV complications, we adopted an intensive strategy that consisted of ganciclovir administered before transplantation (5 mg/kg intravenously daily from day -8 to day -2), high-dose acyclovir (2 g, 3 times daily) after transplantation, and biweekly monitoring with a serum CMV PCR for preemptive therapy. Hazard rates and cumulative incidence of CMV complications along with days treated were compared in high-risk CMV-seropositive UCBT recipients who received the intensive strategy and a historical cohort who received a standard strategy. Of 72 seropositive patients, 29 (40%) received standard prophylaxis and 43 (60%) the new intensive approach. The hazard rate (HR) for CMV reactivation was lower for patients receiving the intensive strategy (HR 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.48; P < .001) and led to fewer cases of CMV disease by 1 year (HR 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.53; P = .006). In patients who reactivated, the intensive strategy also led to fewer days on CMV-specific antiviral therapy (median 42% [interquartile range 21-63] vs 70% [interquartile range 54-83], P < .001). Use of an intensive CMV prevention strategy in high-risk CMVseropositive UCBT recipients results in a significant decrease in CMV reactivation and disease.     

Cidofovir for cytomegalovirus infection and disease in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. The Infectious Diseases Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

A retrospective study was performed to collect information regarding efficacy and toxicity of cidofovir (CDV) in allogeneic stem cell transplant patients. Data were available on 82 patients. The indications for therapy were cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in 20 patients, primary preemptive therapy in 24 patients, and secondary preemptive therapy in 38 patients. Of the patients, 47 had received previous antiviral therapy with ganciclovir, foscarnet, or both drugs. The dosage of CDV was 1 to 5 mg/kg per week followed by maintenance every other week in some patients. The duration of therapy ranged from 1 to 134 days (median, 22 days). All patients received probenecid and prehydration. Ten of 20 (50%) patients who were treated for CMV disease (9 of 16 with pneumonia) responded to CDV therapy, as did 25 of 38 (66%) patients who had failed or relapsed after previous preemptive therapy and 15 of 24 (62%) patients in whom CDV was used as the primary preemptive therapy. Of the patients, 21 (25.6%) developed renal toxicity that remained after cessation of therapy in 12 patients. Fifteen patients developed other toxicities that were potentially due to CDV or the concomitantly given probenecid. No toxicity was seen in 45 (61.6%) patients. Cidofovir can be considered as second-line therapy in patients with CMV disease failing previous antiviral therapy. However, additional studies are needed before CDV can be recommended for preemptive therapy.     

Impact of unrelated donor status on the incidence and outcome of cytomegalovirus infections after non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Little is known about the impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections that occur after human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-matched unrelated donor (MUD) non-myleoablative haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). We analysed the incidence, onset and outcomes of CMV infections in 59 recipients of MUD and in 109 recipients of HLA-matched related donor (MRD) allogeneic HCT following non-myeloablative conditioning containing 2 Gy total body irradiation and fludarabine. In CMV seropositive recipients, antigenaemia occurred in 68% (MUD) and in 49% (MRD, P = 0.08); there were no differences in the maximum levels of CMV antigenaemia and the time to cessation with antiviral therapy. CMV viraemia by culture was more common in MUD compared with MRD HCT recipients in univariate analysis (26% vs. 6%, P = 0.01), however, this difference was not detectable after controlling for other factors. The rates of CMV disease in the first 100 d were similar in MUD (9%) and MRD (5%) HCT recipients. CMV disease tended to occur earlier in the MUD compared with the MRD recipients (median day 41 vs. day 80). Beyond day 100, rates of CMV disease remained similar in both cohorts (cumulative incidence: MUD 21% and MRD 14%). The 30-d and 1-year survivals after CMV disease diagnosis were not significantly different in both groups. Thus, there appeared to be a trend toward increased CMV reactivation in MUD compared with MRD non-myeloablative allogeneic HCT recipients; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance in this cohort and preemptive therapy was similarly effective in preventing CMV diseases.     

Influence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) sero-positivity on CMV infection, lymphocyte recovery and non-CMV infections following T-cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a comparison between two T-cell depletion regimens

We compared the incidence and outcome of preemptively treated cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, lymphocyte recovery and non-CMV infections between two different TCD modalities, one employing CD34+ selection and T-cell add-back (TCAB), preceded by Campath-1H in vivo (CD34+/TCAB group, n=29), and the other using grafts incubated with Campath-1H in vitro (Campath-1H in vitro group, n=32). The probabilities of CMV reactivation and recurrence were 67 and 83.6% in the CD34+/TCAB group and 42.9 and 20% in the Campath-1H group (P=0.07 and 0.02). Donor sero-positivity reduced CMV reactivation in the Campath-1H group, but not in the CD34+/TCAB group. The durations of positive PCR/antigenemia positivity and antiviral therapy were also significantly longer in the CD34+/TCAB group. However, only two patients developed CMV disease in each group. The mean absolute lymphocyte counts (x 10(9)/l) at 30 days (0.27 vs 0.4, P=0.03) and 100 days (0.77 vs 1.4, P=0.01) were significantly lower in the CD34+/TCAB group along with a higher incidence of non-CMV infections in CMV at-risk patients, but not in the CMV low-risk group. These findings suggest that the modality of TCD should be tailored according to the CMV risk status, and CMV sero-positive patients should receive a less extensively T-cell-depleted graft and a CMV sero-positive graft if possible.     

Oral valganciclovir as preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus infection post allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Antiviral compounds including ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir are routinely used in the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease; however, these agents have a poor oral bioavailability and have the inconvenience and expense of intravenous administration. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral valganciclovir (VGCV) for preemptive treatment of CMV reactivation in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 15 patients receiving allogeneic HSCT from related (n=9) or unrelated (n=6) donors. In all patients, either the donor, host, or both were CMV Ig G positive pretransplant. Indication for therapy was preemptive treatment of CMV infection defined as one or two consecutive positive tests of pp65 antigenemia assay or CMV-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). VGCV was administered orally in a dosage of 900 mg b.i.d. for 2 weeks, followed by 450 mg b.i.d. for 2 additional weeks. RESULTS: Patients developed a positive CMV-PCR after a median of 52 days (range 37-427) post HSCT and a positive pp65 antigenemia after a median time of 74 days (range 37-427) post HSCT. Preemptive treatment with VGCV was started a median time of 56 days (range 37-429) after transplant. In all, 11 patients (73%) completed the 28 days of therapy with VGCV. All patients showed a complete clearance of the virus. The median time to achieve a negative CMV-PCR was 6 days (range 4-18). A relapse of CMV infection after VGCV preemptive therapy occurred in 6 patients (40%). No patient developed early or late CMV disease. Six patients (40%) presented hematological toxicity including neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia that required drug discontinuation in 4 cases. CONCLUSION: VGCV administered as preemptive therapy for CMV infection in patients receiving an allogeneic HSCT showed promise for treating this frequent complication. Prospective randomized studies in this setting are mandatory to yield more definitive results.     

A randomised trial comparing cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay vs screening bronchoscopy for the early detection and prevention of disease in allogeneic bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell transplant recipients

Preemptive antiviral therapy is often employed for CMV prevention following allogeneic BMT. Two common strategies are a screening bronchoscopy for CMV post-BMT or regular CMV antigenemia testing with ganciclovir administration for a positive result. In a randomised trial, we prospectively compared the efficacy of these two preemptive strategies. Consecutive patients were randomised to either a bronchoscopy for CMV on day 35 post BMT or weekly CMV antigenemia testing. If the bronchoscopy was positive for CMV, patients received preemptive ganciclovir for 8-10 weeks. If the antigenemia was positive for CMV, patients received a minimum of 2 weeks of preemptive ganciclovir. The primary endpoint was the development of active CMV disease. One hundred and eighteen allogeneic BMT patients were enrolled (60 in the antigenemia arm and 58 in the bronchoscopy arm). The two groups were comparable with respect to baseline demographic data, underlying disease, conditioning regimen, and immunosuppression. Active CMV disease developed in 7/58 (12.1%) patients in the bronchoscopy arm vs 1/60 patients (1.7%) in the CMV antigenemia arm (P = 0.022). Based on the screening test, 13.8% of patients received preemptive ganciclovir in the bronchoscopy arm vs 48.3% of patients in the antigenemia arm (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the rate of graft-versus-host disease, bacteremia, invasive fungal infections or mortality between the two groups. Preemptive therapy based on regular CMV antigenemia monitoring is superior to screening bronchoscopy for the prevention of CMV disease after allogeneic BMT.     

CMV pneumonia in allogeneic BMT recipients undergoing early treatment of pre-emptive ganciclovir therapy

The incidence, treatment and outcome of CMV interstitial pneumonia (CMV-IP) were reviewed in 139 consecutive allogeneic BMT patients undergoing extended CMV antigenemia surveillance and two different ganciclovir (GCV) strategies to control CMV infection. Nineteen cases of CMV-IP were reviewed, 16 of 63 patients (25.4%) who received early GCV treatment (ET) and three of 76 patients (3.9%) who received preemptive (PE) GCV therapy. In the ET group, the median time for occurrence of CMV-IP was 55 (range 36 to 311) days. Two patients had three episodes of CMV-IP recurrences after day +100. CMV-IP-related death occurred in two patients (15.4%). In the PE group, 41 patients received pre-emptive GCV therapy prompted by the appearance of positive antigenemia > or =2 cells. The median time for the occurrence of CMV-IP was 92 (range 48 to 197) days. Response to therapy was observed when GCV was introduced within 6 days of antigenemia positivity. The use of IVIg in association with GCV did not play a major role in response to therapy. The median time for occurrence of CMV-IP was delayed during PE strategy and the cost-effectiveness of CMV surveillance after day +100 should be investigated in this population.     

Clinical significance of post‐prophylaxis cytomegalovirus infection in lung transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV ) disease has been associated with the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD ) after transplantation. However, the relevance of CMV replication occurring after the discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis on the development of CLAD has not been fully established. Patients who underwent lung transplantation during 2004‐2014 were included. All patients received antiviral prophylaxis for 3‐6 months, followed by monitoring of CMV replication during the first year post‐transplantation (preemptive therapy). Risk factors for the development of CLAD were assessed by Cox models. A linear regression model with an interaction coefficient between time and CMV infection was used to evaluate the influence of CMV infection on the evolution of FEV ₁. Overall, 69 patients were included, 30/69 (43%) patients developed at least 1 episode of significant CMV infection, and 8/69 (11.5%) patients developed CMV disease. After a median follow‐up of 3.67 years, 25/69 (36%) patients developed CLAD and 14/69 (20%) patients died. In the univariate Cox analysis, significant CMV infection (HR 1.177, P  = .698), CMV disease (HR 1.001, P  = .998), and duration of CMV replication (HR 1.004, P  = .758) were not associated with CLAD . Only bacterial pneumonia tended to be associated with CLAD in the multivariate model (HR 2.579, P  = .062). We did not observe a significant interaction between CMV replication and evolution FEV ₁ (interaction coefficient 0.006, CI 95% [?0.084 to 0.096], P  = .890). In this cohort of lung transplant recipients receiving antiviral prophylaxis and monitored by preemptive therapy post‐prophylaxis, CMV infection did not have impact on long‐term allograft lung function.     

Evaluation of the COBAS Amplicor HCMV Monitor for early detection and monitoring of human cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Early diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection and the introduction of preemptive antiviral therapy have reduced HCMV-related mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. A critical goal remains stratifying risk profiles and minimizing potential harm owing to antiviral overtreatment. We compared the commercially available standardized COBAS Amplicor CMV Monitor (CACM) to an in-house PCR assay, for the monitoring of HCMV infection. Seventy-two patients were surveyed by an in-house PCR of whole blood, quantitative viral load assessment by CACM and virus culture assays in a prospective and a retrospective study. A high concordance between CACM and PCR was documented. The viral load at onset correlated with the peak viral load (Spearman rank correlation R=0.634, P=0.0004). In patients developing HCMV disease, both viral loads were in trend higher (P=0.823, respectively P=0.053), and the viremic episodes longer (P=0.015), as compared to asymptomatically HCMV-infected patients. The serological pre-transplant status was the major risk factor for the development of HCMV disease, showing highest risk for seropositive patients receiving a seronegative graft, whereas donor type (related or unrelated) and graft type (bone marrow or peripheral blood mobilized stem cells) did not have an influence. HCMV infection proved to be a risk factor for the development of non-viral opportunistic infections (P=0.002).     

Pre‐transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus remains the most important determinant of CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of surveillance and preemptive therapy

B. George, N. Pati, N. Gilroy, M. Ratnamohan, G. Huang, I. Kerridge, M. Hertzberg, D. Gottlieb, K. Bradstock. Pre‐transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus remains the most important determinant of CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of surveillance and preemptive therapy.
Transpl Infect Dis 2010: 12: 322–329. All rights reserved Abstract: Between January 2001 and June 2008, 315 adult patients (median age 43 years, range 16–65) including 203 males and 112 females undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) had serial monitoring for cytomegalovirus (CMV) followed by initiation of preemptive therapy. The majority (62.1%) had a conventional myeloablative transplant with 116 (36.9%) having a reduced‐intensity conditioning (RIC) transplant, using either matched sibling/family (63.3%) or unrelated donors (36.7%). Graft source was peripheral blood stem cells in 257 (81.5%), bone marrow in 41 (13.1%), and cord blood in 16 (5.4%). T‐cell depletion with anti‐thymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab was used in 35%. Based upon CMV serostatus, patients were classified into low risk (donor [D]?/recipient [R]?), intermediate risk (D+/R?), or high risk (D?/R+ or D+/R+). Serial weekly monitoring for CMV viremia was performed using a qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and when positive, quantification was done using either pp65 antigen or a quantitative PCR. CMV reactivation was seen in 123 patients (39.1%) at a median of 50 days post HSCT (range 22–1978). CMV serostatus was the most important risk factor with incidence of 53% in the high‐risk group (53.3%) compared with 10.2% in the intermediate risk and 0% in the low‐risk group (P<0.0001). Other significant risk factors identified included use of alemtuzumab during conditioning (P=0.03), RIC transplants (P=0.06), and the presence of acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) (P<0.0001). On a multivariate analysis, CMV serostatus, RIC transplants, and acute GVHD remained independent predictors of CMV reactivation. All were treated with antiviral therapy with responses seen in 109 (88.6%). Sixteen patients (13%) developed CMV disease at a median of 59 days post HSCT (range 26 days–46 months), 8 of whom died. At a median follow up of 43 months (range 6–93), 166 patients (52.6%) are alive with a significantly higher survival among patients without CMV reactivation (57.2%) as compared with patients with CMV reactivation (45.5%; P=0.049). CMV reactivation and disease remains a major problem in high‐risk patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Novel prophylactic measures such as immunotherapy and drug prophylaxis need to be considered in this specific group of patients.     

Extended routine polymerase chain reaction surveillance and pre-emptive antiviral therapy for cytomegalovirus after allogeneic transplantation

Pre-emptive treatment strategies based on sensitive screening for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection up to day +100 after allogeneic transplantation have been shown to reduce the incidence of CMV disease during the period of surveillance. However, the use of ganciclovir has been associated with delays in immune reconstitution and an increased incidence of late CMV disease after day +100. In the present study, 81 patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation received polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-guided pre-emptive therapy based on detection of CMV DNA by PCR on 2 consecutive weeks up to day +180. Thirty-three of the 52 high-risk patients (CMV-seropositive donor or recipient) received a total of 45 treatment episodes up to day +100. Three of these patients (5.7%) developed CMV disease, with one fatality. Twelve of the surviving 44 high-risk patients (27%) required pre-emptive treatment between days +101 and +192, but none of these patients developed late CMV disease with a median follow-up of 402 d (range 117-952 d). Antiviral therapy was stopped after a single negative PCR result with no subsequent episodes of CMV disease while patients remained off antiviral treatment. As all initial episodes of CMV DNA detection occurred within 60 d of transplantation, it may be possible to discontinue monitoring beyond day +100 in patients who have remained CMV PCR negative before this. Thus, we have confirmed that PCR-guided pre-emptive therapy results in a low incidence of CMV disease before day +100 and that discontinuing treatment on the basis of viral clearance as determined by CMV PCR appears to be safe practice. In addition, we have observed no episodes of late CMV disease with an extension of surveillance to 26 weeks.     

Effects of tissue cytomegalovirus quantitative polymerase chain reaction in the management of ulcerative colitis flare-ups: Should we wave aside?

Background and Study AimsThe role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection for disease reactivation in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients remains controversial and diagnostic tests are yet to be standardized. We aimed to define the clinical relevance of CMV detection by mucosal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in UC patients by comparing the clinical course of UC in CMV-treated and CMV-untreated groups in tissue CMV-PCR positive cases.Patients and MethodsIn this retrospective study, 141 patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe UC admitted to our clinic with disease flare, colonic tissue CMV PCR was assessed.ResultsThe median age of the study population was 39 years, and 99 (70.2%) patients were male. Eighty-eight (62.4%) patients were CMV-PCR (+) and 53 (37.6%) were CMV PCR (-). The CMV-PCR (+) and CMV PCR (-) groups showed no significant difference concerning age, sex, disease duration, site of involvement and disease activity and administered treatments. The median tissue CMV-PCR was 41,098 IU/mL (IQR:2,344.25–136,192). Thirty-four of 88 CMV-PCR (+) patients received antiviral therapy. The tissue CMV-PCR level of patients who received antiviral therapy was 124,381 IU/mL (IQR: 19,309–412,335), and it was 6,292 IU/mL (IQR: 997–71,154) in patients who did not receive antiviral therapy; (p < 0.001). Sixteen (47.1%) of 34 patients who received antiviral therapy achieved remission. Two of the non-responders underwent colectomy (one because of dysplasia and one who did not respond subsequent biologic agent either). Remaing 16 achieved remission by escalating the immunsuppresive/biologic agent therapy.ConclusionCMV infection is responsible for only a minority of cases of UC flares and all are steroid-resistant cases. Most of the patients non-responsive to antiviral treatment respond to increased anti-inflammatory treatment. Hesitancy in the decision of escalating immunsuppresive treatment rather than CMV disease may be responsible for worsening disease course and increased colectomy rate in a significant number of the patients who are tissue CMV-PCR (+).     

Lymphocytopenia as an unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with cytomegalovirus infection after bone marrow transplantation

Sixty-three recipients of an allogeneic marrow transplant were screened for the occurrence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and clinical parameters possibly predicting the development of CMV disease in a retrospective study. Blood and urine samples obtained from these patients were screened weekly after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for the presence of CMV by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and virus culture technique. Forty-six of the 63 patients studied were found to be CMV-positive by PCR technique in blood and urine samples at a median of 29 days after BMT. In 33 of these 46 patients, CMV could be cultured from urine samples and 16 of the 46 had culture-positive viremia. Twenty-eight of these 46 PCR-positive patients developed CMV disease. Whereas PCR assays showed an optimal negative predictive value and sensitivity for the development of CMV disease, their positive predictive value was 61% and could not be remarkably increased when culture-proven viruria (64%) and viremia (69%) were considered. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade 2 to 4 (P < .05), but not underlying disease, conditioning therapy, or GVHD prophylaxis, was associated with CMV infection. On day +49, a remarkable decrease (P < .001) in the lymphocyte count, as well as in the absolute number of CD4+, CD8+, and CD56+ lymphocytes, occurred only among the patients who later developed CMV disease. The decrease of all of these cell counts, but predominantly the CD4+ T cells, to less than 100/microL on day +49 after BMT showed a very high positive predictive value (100%) for the development of CMV disease in patients with PCR-proven viremia. Persisting CD4 lymphopenia after antiviral therapy was only observed in patients who finally died of CMV disease. Thus, immunophenotyping of the patients after BMT in addition to a highly sensitive virus detection assay might help to identify patients at high risk to develop CMV disease and indicate the need for additional adoptive immunotherapy.     

Oral valganciclovir as pre-emptive therapy has similar efficacy on cytomegalovirus DNA load reduction as intravenous ganciclovir in allogeneic stem cell transplantation recipients

The efficacy and safety of oral valganciclovir was compared to ganciclovir i.v. in pre-emptive treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in T-cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) recipients. A therapeutic guideline was developed to allow the safe application of valganciclovir in allo-SCT recipients requiring CMV therapy. In total, 107 consecutive transplant recipients were evaluated. Cytomegalovirus DNA load in plasma was monitored longitudinally; details on antiviral therapy and treatment responses were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty-seven CMV treatment episodes were recorded in 34 patients: 20 with valganciclovir (900 mg twice-daily) and 37 with ganciclovir (5 mg/kg twice-daily). Median CMV DNA load reduction was 0.079 and 0.069 log10 copies/ml/day in the ganciclovir and valganciclovir group, respectively. Good response on CMV DNA load (reduction below 3.0 log10 copies/ml) was observed in 75.7% of ganciclovir and 80.0% of valganciclovir treatment episodes. Severe adverse effects were not observed and CMV-related disease did not occur. However, the percentage of patients receiving erythrocyte transfusion was higher in the group of patients receiving ganciclovir as compared to valganciclovir (41 versus 20%, P=0.116). In conclusion, pre-emptive treatment with valganciclovir and ganciclovir, led to similar reduction of CMV DNA load. Oral valganciclovir is an attractive and safe alternative for pre-emptive CMV treatment in T-cell-depleted allo-SCT recipients.     

Leukocyte depleted,unscreened blood products give a low risk for CMV infection and disease in CMV seronegative allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients with seronegative stem cell donors

Leukocyte depletion (LD) by blood product filtration has been shown to be similarly effective to the use of screened, CMV seronegative blood products to prevent CMV disease in CMV seronegative allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) patients with CMV seronegative donors. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the risk for development of CMV infection requiring preemptive therapy and for CMV disease if unscreened products treated by prestorage LD is used. Forty-nine consecutive patients transplanted after June 1995 were included. As a control group, 33 patients transplanted from January 1992 to June 1995 in whom a combination of CMV seronegative and LD blood products were given. All patients were monitored weekly by a leukocyte-based PCR for CMV DNA detection. Preemptive therapy was initiated after two consecutively positive tests. No patient developed CMV disease in either group. CMV DNA was detected in 6/49 (p = NS) in the study group and in 3/33 patients in the historical control group. Two patients in the study group were given preemptive therapy compared to one patient in the control group. This study suggests that the risk for CMV disease and the need for preemptive therapy against CMV is low in CMV seronegative allogeneic SCT patients receiving grafts from CMV seronegative stem cell donors receiving LD blood products. Thus, this strategy can be safely used together with PCR monitoring and preemptive therapy.     

抢先治疗异基因造血干细胞移植后巨细胞病毒感染的临床分析

目的 回顾性分析抢先治疗异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)后巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染的临床意义.方法 allo-HSCT治疗的患者103例,采用荧光定量PCR法监测CMV-DNA,并根据其结果抢先治疗CMV相关疾病,分析抢先治疗对于阻止CMV血症发展为CMV相关疾病的意义.结果 103例患者中检测出63例次(51例)CMV-DNA阳性,CMV血症发生率为49.5%,经抢先治疗19例发生CMV相关疾病,发生率为18.4%.60例次CMV血症经更昔洛韦和(或)膦甲酸治疗转阴,1例不可评价疗效,治疗的总有效率为96.8%(60/62).CMV相关疾病的治疗总有效率为89.5%(17/19),2例患者因CMV相关肺炎伴急性GVHD而死亡,CMV相关疾病的直接死亡率为1.9%(2/103).结论 在不进行预防性治疗的前提下,CMV血症和CMV相关疾病发生率未见升高.抢先治疗能有效阻止大部分CMV血症患者发病,并能有效控制CMV相关疾病的进展.