Alemtuzumab induction and triple maintenance immunotherapy in kidney transplantation from donors after cardiac death.

We have used alemtuzumab in combination with triple maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplantation from donors after cardiac death between 2002 and 2006. We compared outcomes of induction therapy with alemtuzumab with interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor antagonists (RA) and anti-lymphocyte antibodies. We used a retrospective sequential study design to examine 170 recipients of kidneys from donor after cardiac death (DCD) for survival, graft survival, time to first rejection, glomerular filtration and complications. Patients were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the following criteria: panel of reactive antibodies >20%, retransplants, Afro-American race. Induction with alemtuzumab was compared with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) in the high-risk and with IL-2RA in the low-risk group. Patients received triple immunosuppression with steroids, mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitors. Patient survival, graft survival, rejection rate and glomerular filtration rate did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab versus IL-2RAs or ATG. There was a trend towards reduced graft- and patient survival in the alemtuzumab group. There was an increased incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in the alemtuzumab-induced group and a trend towards increased BK virus and bacterial infections. Induction of DCD kidney transplants with alemtuzumab compared to IL-2RA and ATG has no significant impact on acute rejection. It appears however that CMV infections are increased in patients induced with alemtuzumab. We therefore conclude that induction with alemtuzumab does not confer any advantage over traditional induction agents.     

阿来佐单抗行肾移植免疫诱导治疗的有效性和安全性

目的 评价阿来佐单抗行肾移植免疫诱导治疗的有效性和安全性.方法 将89例肾移植受者随机分为试验组(43例)和对照组(46例).试验组于肾移植术前和术后24 h内分别静脉滴注阿来佐单抗15 mg,对照组不接受免疫诱导治疗.受者术后常规应用环孢素A(或他克莫司)+吗替麦考酚酯+泼尼松预防排斥反应.统计两组术后12月内的移植肾功能、急性排斥反应发生率、感染发生率、移植肾功能延迟恢复发生率、移植肾存活率及淋巴细胞计数,并用ImmuKnowTM免疫细胞功能测定法检测受者CD4+T淋巴细胞的三磷酸腺苷(ATP)值.结果 术后12个月内试验组7.0%(3/43)的受者发生病理证实的急性排斥反应,明显低于对照组的23.9%(11/46,P＜0.05).试验组和对照组总体的感染发生率为别为39.5%(17/43)和30.4%(14/46,P＞0.05),两组机会性感染的发生率分另为23.2%(10/43)和17.4%(8/46,P＞0.05).术后3个月内,试验组淋巴细胞计数低于对照组;术后6个月内,试验组CD4+T淋巴细胞ATP值低于对照组.结论 阿来佐单抗行肾移植免疫诱导治疗可维持受者的免疫抑制状态,未见严重不良反应.     

Daclizumab and Alemtuzumab as Induction Agents in Adult Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: Rejection and Infection Rates in 40 Recipients During the Early Postoperative Period

Background

Allograft rejection in intestinal transplantation occurs frequently, and bacterial, fungal, and viral infections related to strong immunosuppression regimens remain an important complication posttransplantation. Induction therapy has enabled improvement in graft and patient survival rates.

Objectives

In analyze the effects of daclizumab and alemtuzumab as induction therapies on inflections complications and incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) during the early posttransplantation period.

Patients and Methods

Between December 2000 and August 2009, we performed 43 intestinal transplantation procedures in 42 adult recipients (median [SD] age, 34.8 [9.5] years; male-female ratio, 22:20; isolated or multivisceral graft, 32/11), and compared findings during the first 30 days posttransplantation in 40 recipients. Patients were divided into 2 groups: 12 treated with daclizumab (Zenapax; Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland): 8 isolated intestinal grafts and 4 multivisceral grafts) and 28 treated with alemtuzumab (Campath-1H: 22 isolated intestinal grafts and 6 multivisceral grafts). Maintenance immunosuppression was based on tacrolimus and steroids in the first group and low-dose tacrolimus in the second group.

Results

During the first month posttransplantation, 8 daclizumab recipients (66.6%) experienced 9 episodes of mild ACR, which were successfully treated with steroid therapy, and 8 patients (66.6%) developed a bacterial infection requiring treatment. Fourteen episodes of ACR occurred in 12 alemtuzumab recipients (42.8%): 11 mild, 1 mild to moderate, and 2 moderate; 16 patients (57.1%) required treatment for infections. Five-year patient cumulative survival was 66% in daclizumab recipients and 43% in alemtuzumab recipients. Five-year graft survivals was 66% in daclizumab recipients and 41% in alemtuzumab recipients. In both groups, P was not statistically significative.

Conclusions

The infection rate is considerably high with both protocols. Alemtuzumab seems to offer better immunosuppression against ACRs during the first month posttransplantation.     

Steroid-Withdrawal at 3 Days After Renal Transplantation with Anti-IL-2 Receptor α Therapy: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study

Steroids have been included in most immunosuppressive regimens after renal transplantation, but are feared for their side-effects. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to investigate whether it is feasible to withdraw steroids early after transplantation with the use of anti-IL-2Ralpha induction, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). A total of 364 patients were randomized to receive either two doses of daclizumab (1 mg/kg) and, for the first 3 days, 100 mg of prednisolone (daclizumab group n = 186), or steroids (tapered to 0 mg at week 16; controls n = 178). All patients received tacrolimus and MMF. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months was not different between the daclizumab group (15%) and the controls (14%) (95% confidence interval of difference: -6 to + 8%, NS). Graft survival at 12 months was comparable in the two groups (daclizumab group: 91%; controls: 90%). Mean arterial blood pressure, serum lipids, and incidence of patients with hyperglycemia were temporary lower in the daclizumab group compared with controls. The immunosuppressive regimen of the daclizumab group was associated with increased costs. In conclusion, with the use of anti-IL-2Ra induction and daily therapy with tacrolimus and MMF it is feasible to withdraw steroids at 3 days after renal transplantation.     

Alemtuzumab Induction and Prednisone-Free Maintenance Immunotherapy in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation Comparison With Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction – Long-Term Results

This study compared the effects of using two T-cell depleting antibodies, alemtuzumab (anti-CD 52, Campath-1H) and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin), as induction immunosuppression for recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation given a prednisone-free maintenance regimen. We used a single-center, nonrandomised, retrospective, sequential study design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab (n = 50) or antithymocyte globulin (n = 38) induction in combination with a prednisone-free, tacrolimus/sirolimus-based immunosuppression protocol. Kaplan-Meier analyses of long-term patient and graft survivals and rejection rates were determined according to induction agent. Secondary endpoints included the quality of renal allograft function, incidence of infectious and malignant complications, and cost considerations. Overall long-term patient and graft survival rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab and antithymocyte globulin. Rejection rates were also nearly equivalent at 1 and 2 years. Viral infectious complications were statistically significantly lower in the alemtuzumab group. The cost of alemtuzumab induction was lower than antithymocyte globulin. Alemtuzumab induction followed by steroid-free maintenance therapy with a tacrolimus/sirolimus-based immunosuppression regimen provided an effective, safe and cost-conscious approach to SPK transplantation.     

Long-term results of mycophenolate mofetil as part of immunosuppressive induction therapy after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to the induction protocol resulted in a lower incidence of rejection episodes. However, the question whether MMF should be administered in combination with tacrolimus or cyclosporine has not been answered yet. In our study, we report on the long-term results of triple induction therapy after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), consisting of MMF and low-dose corticosteroids, in combination with either tacrolimus or cyclosporine. METHODS: Between March 1996 and April 1997, 120 consecutive patients, who underwent OLT at our institution, were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 80 received triple induction therapy consisting of cyclosporine and MMF (40) or tacrolimus and MMF (40), in combination with low-dose corticosteroids, whereas the remaining 40 patients served as 'MMF-free' control group receiving dual induction therapy with tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Besides the eight-yr follow-up of patient and graft survival, clinical data were also reviewed for episodes of rejection and infection. Additionally, the early post-operative pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA, immunological active metabolite of MMF) were evaluated. RESULTS: Long-term results provided higher patient and graft survival after tacrolimus/MMF-based induction therapy than after cyclosporine/MMF-based induction therapy. However, the tacrolimus-based control protocol yielded similar results and, therefore, no significantly superior effect was observed when MMF was added. The same observation was made for incidence of rejection and infection episodes. AUC and C(max) of MPA increased in combination with tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine. CONCLUSIONS: Although pharmacological synergy between tacrolimus and MMF was observed, MMF showed no significant beneficial effects in the immunosuppressive induction protocol, neither in combination with tacrolimus nor with cyclosporine.     

Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression with tacrolimus following induction with daclizumab: a large randomized clinical study.

This open, randomized (1 : 1), multicenter, 3-month study compared a dual tacrolimus plus steroids (Tac / steroids) regimen with a steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen of tacrolimus following daclizumab induction therapy (Tac / Dac) in adult liver transplant recipients. The full analysis set comprised 347 patients in the Tac / steroids group and 351 in the Tac / Dac group. Mean tacrolimus dose during month 3 was 0.11 mg/kg/day in both groups; mean whole-blood trough levels during month 3 were 10.9 ng/mL (Tac / steroids) and 10.6 ng/mL (Tac / Dac). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection that required treatment was similar in both groups: 26.5% in the Tac / steroids group and 25.4% in the Tac / Dac group (P = .727). However, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection was higher in the Tac / steroids group than in the Tac / Dac group (6.3 vs. 2.8%; P = .027). Kaplan-Meier estimates of graft survival (92.2 vs. 90.5%) and patient survival (94.5 vs. 93.7%) were similar in both groups. While also the overall adverse event profiles were similar, the incidences of diabetes mellitus (15.3 vs. 5.7%, respectively; P < .001) and cytomegalovirus infection (11.5 vs. 5.1%, respectively; P = .002) were higher in the Tac / steroids group compared with the Tac / Dac group. Mean cholesterol levels increased by 16% in the Tac / steroids group, but were unchanged in the Tac / Dac group during the study. In conclusion, tacrolimus monotherapy following daclizumab induction is an effective and safe regimen, with an advantage over concomitant steroid-maintenance therapy in terms of a lower incidence of diabetes and viral infection, and a lower incidence of steroid-resistant acute rejection.     

The safety and efficacy of a two-dose daclizumab (zenapax) induction therapy in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Induction therapy with daclizumab has been shown to be efficacious in the prevention of acute rejection in kidney transplant patients. The routine use of antibody induction therapy in liver transplantation has not gained widespread acceptance, except in the cases of renal insufficiency. The recent approval of daclizumab prompted us to initiate this pilot study using induction therapy in those patients at risk for developing posttransplant renal insufficiency. METHODS: This nonrandomized study examined the use of daclizumab in 39 of the last 97 liver transplants performed at the University of Alabama in Birmingham. The daclizumab group received 2 mg/kg intravenously before organ engraftment, and 38 of the 39 received 1 mg/kg intravenously on postoperative day 5. The control group consisted of the remaining 58 contemporary patients. Additional immunosuppression consisted of steroids, tacrolimus, or microemulsion cyclosporine in all patients and mycophenolate mofetil in selected patients. RESULTS: Pretransplant demographics were not significantly different between the groups. In the induction group there were significantly fewer males, 14 (36%) vs. 34 (59%) (P=0.03). They had greater renal insufficiency at the time of transplant, serum creatine 1.9+/-0.37 mg/dl vs. 0.8+/-0.5; P=0.0009, and more patients were at higher acuity (status 1 and 2A): 12 (31%) vs. 3 (5%) P=0.0006 than in the noninduction group. By postoperative day 7, renal function improved in the induction group such that it was not significantly different from the noninduction group and remained similar throughout the rest of the follow-up. The induction group also experienced significantly less acute rejection, 7 (18%) vs. 23 (40%) (P=0.02) than in the noninduction group in the first 6 months. The 1-, 3-, and 6-month patient survival rates were similar in the induction group, 97.4%, 97.4%, and 97.4%, vs. non-induction 94.8%, 93.0%, and 93% (P=NS). The incidence of cytomegalovirus, in the first 6 months, in the induction group was four (10%) vs. five (9%) (P=NS) in the noninduction group. CONCLUSION: In the pilot study, induction therapy with daclizumab was safe, facilitated improvement in renal function, and appeared to reduce the incidence of acute rejection. Combination therapy with daclizumab may be an important adjunct in immunosuppressive strategies for liver transplant recipients.     

Alemtuzumab Induction and Prednisone-Free Maintenance Immunotherapy in Kidney Transplantation: Comparison with Basiliximab Induction—Long-Term Results

This study examined alemtuzumab (anti-CD 52, Campath-1H) and basiliximab (anti-CD 25, Simulect) as induction immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. We used a single-center, nonrandomized, retrospective, sequential study design to evaluate outcomes in kidney transplant recipients given either alemtuzumab (n = 123) or basiliximab (n = 155) induction in combination with a prednisone-free maintenance protocol using tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Kaplan-Meier analyses of long-term patient and graft survivals and rejection rates were determined according to induction agent, donor source and recipient ethnicity. Secondary endpoints included the quality of renal allograft function and the etiology of infectious complications. Overall long-term patient and graft survival rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab and basiliximab. A lower rate of early (<3 months) rejection was observed in the alemtuzumab (4.1%) versus the basiliximab (11.6%) group, but the rates for both groups were equivalent at 1 year. Patient and kidney survival and rejection rates were nearly identical between Caucasians and African Americans that received alemtuzumab. Quality of renal function and incidence of infectious complications were similar in the two groups. Alemtuzumab induction therapy was similar in efficacy to basiliximab in a prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol for an ethnically diverse population of kidney transplant recipients.     

Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) and Tacrolimus Monotherapy After Renal Transplantation: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial

The lymphocyte-depleting antibody alemtuzumab was evaluated in a prospective randomized multicenter trial in deceased donor kidney transplantation.
The 65 patients in the study group received induction with alemtuzumab followed by delayed tacrolimus monotherapy, while the 66 patients in the control group were started on tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Tacrolimus levels of 8–12 ng/mL for the first 6 months and 5–8 ng/mL thereafter were aimed for in both groups.
At 12 months the biopsy-proven rejection rate was 20% in the study group and 32% in the control group (p = 0.09). Patient survival at 1 year was 98% for both groups. Graft survival was 96% for the study group versus 90% for the control group (p = 0.18).
Graft function was identical in both groups. Adverse events were similar in both groups apart for more CMV infections in the study group. At the end of the first year 82% of the patients in the study group were steroid-free and 71% continued on tacrolimus monotherapy.
These results suggest that alemtuzumab induction together with tacrolimus monotherapy is at least as efficient in renal transplantation as is a tacrolimus-based triple-drug regimen with a similar safety profile but more CMV infections.     

Daclizumab induction/tacrolimus sparing: a randomized prospective trial in renal transplantation

Abstract: Tacrolimus inhibits lymphocyte responses by blocking calcium-dependent signalling pathways important in IL-2 generation. Daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, binds with high affinity to the Tac subunit of the IL-2 receptor complex. We reasoned therefore that the absence of IL-2R should permit lower doses of tacrolimus and thereby less toxicity. Twenty-eight patients were randomized and followed for 6 months: Group 1, high dose (HD) tacrolimus (trough 12–17 ng/mL; n  = 13); Group 2, low dose (LD) tacrolimus (trough 5–10 ng/mL; n  = 15). All patients received daclizumab induction (2 mg/kg) on days 0 and 14, mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/d except for one patient who received 1 g) and rapid prednisone taper. Serious infections were minimal in both groups. Hospitalizations, for various reasons, were HD ( n  = 12) and LD ( n  = 6). All patients and grafts survived for the 6-month study period. There was one rejection episode in a non-compliant patient at 101 d. LD tacrolimus appears equally effective as HD tacrolimus in preventing rejection episodes and may be associated with fewer adverse events.     

Daclizumab induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as an immunosuppression regimen for primary kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have demonstrated the efficacy of interleukin-2-receptor blockers in lowering the incidence of early acute rejection in cyclosporine-treated kidney recipients when compared to patients not induced with an antibody product. The addition of daclizumab to a tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppressive protocol was tested to evaluate whether there might be an additional reduction of the risk of rejection after renal transplantation. METHODS: Since March 1998, we studied the effect of daclizumab in a nonrandomized, prospective study of 233 sequential recipients of first renal transplant. They were retrospective compared with a control group of 225 renal transplant recipients receiving a 10-day course of OKT3 induction, and tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone maintenance. The study group received the same immunosuppressive regimen with the addition of daclizumab at 1 mg/kg for five doses over 10 weeks in the place of OKT3 therapy. There was at least 1HLA DR antigen compatibility match present between all donors and recipients. Patients were followed for 1 year after renal transplantation for the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, patient and graft survival, and adverse events. RESULTS: At 12 months, patient and graft survival for the daclizumab was 98 and 96 vs. 96 and 94% for the OKT3 group, respectively, and were not statistically different. Acute rejection rates (<6 months) were lower in the daclizumab group as compared with the OKT3 group, i.e., 5 (2.1%) vs. 16 (7.1%) (P=0.011) respectively. The incidence of infection requiring hospitalization appeared to be lower with daclizumab (7.3 vs. 16%, P<0.0036) with a similar trend with cyclomegalovirus infection, i.e., 1.6 vs. 4%, respectively (P=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of daclizumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids is safe and effective for kidney transplant recipients in lowering the incidence of early acute rejection and without any increase in morbidity when compared to our previous protocol, which may have an eventual impact in long-term graft survival.     

Pediatric liver transplantation with daclizumab induction

BACKGROUND: A new class of monoclonal antibodies (non-T-cell depleting) has gained favor for induction therapy after transplantation. This study evaluated the non-T-cell depleting antibody to the CD25 cell, daclizumab, as a single-dose induction agent immediately after pediatric liver transplantation to spare the use of the calcineurin inhibitor, tacrolimus, for 7 days in respect to both efficacy and renal function. METHODS: From January 1998 to November 2001, 81 pediatric orthotopic liver transplant recipients receiving 89 liver grafts were evaluated. The treatment arm (n=61) received daclizumab 1 mg/kg immediately after liver transplantation along with mycophenolate, steroids, and, on postoperative day 7, tacrolimus. The control group did not receive induction therapy, whereas tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroids were started immediately after surgery. RESULTS: The induction group had fewer patients with rejection within the first 30 days after liver transplantation (9 [14.8%] vs. 10 [50%]; P=0.003). The mean time to first rejection was similar between groups (12.1 [+/-7.8] days vs. 18.5 [+/-8.1] days; P=not significant). There was a 3.39 increase in relative risk to develop rejection within the first 30 days after orthotopic liver transplantation if the patient did not receive induction therapy (relative risk=3.39; 95% confidence interval [1.61, 7.14]). Two-year actuarial survival for the induction group was 93.2% compared with 85% in the control; graft survival was also similar between groups (87.8% vs. 72.7%) at 2 years. CONCLUSION: Daclizumab 1 mg/kg given immediately after pediatric liver transplantation and withholding tacrolimus, is safe, efficacious, and reduces rejections within the first 30 days after surgery.     

Dissociation of Depletional Induction and Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disease in Kidney Recipients Treated With Alemtuzumab

Transplant patients are at the risk for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), a virally-driven malignancy. Induction with the depleting antibody preparations Thymoglobulin and OKT3 is associated with PTLD suggesting that the T-cell depletion increases PTLD risk. We therefore studied 59 560 kidney recipients from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) database for a relationship between induction agent use and PTLD. Two agents with comparable T-cell depletional effects, alemtuzumab and Thymoglobulin, were compared to nondepletional induction agents or no induction. The overall incidence of PTLD was 0.46% and differed significantly by induction strategy (p < 0.01): without induction (0.43%), basiliximab (0.38%), daclizumab (0.33%), Thymoglobulin (0.67%) and alemtuzumab (0.37%). Thymoglobulin was associated with significantly increased PTLD risk (p = 0.0025), but alemtuzumab (p = 0.74), basiliximab (p = 0.33) and daclizumab, which trended toward a protective effect (p = 0.06), were not. Alemtuzumab and Thymoglobulin treated patients did not differ in any established parameter affecting PTLD risk although alemtuzumab is known to have a more pronounced B-cell depleting effect. Interestingly, maintenance therapy with an mTOR inhibitor was strongly associated with PTLD (0.71%, p < 0.0001). Thus, depletional induction is not an independent risk factor for PTLD. Rather, maintenance drug selection or perhaps the balance between B- and T-cell depletion may be more relevant determinants of PTLD risk.     

Pilot study of rapid steroid elimination with alemtuzumab induction therapy in kidney and pancreas transplantation

This study evaluates our initial experience using alemtuzumab induction with rapid corticosteroid elimination in kidney (KTX) and pancreas transplant (PTX) patients. Data were collected retrospectively for all patients who received single-dose alemtuzumab (30 mg IV intraoperatively) with steroid pretreatment and a control group who received alternate day rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction with a steroid-based regimen. Patients in both groups received tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). There were 16 patients in each group, including 9 deceased donor KTXs, 5 living donor KTXs, 1 simultaneous K-PTX, and 1 sequential PTX after KTX. Demographic, immunologic, and transplant characteristics were similar between groups. Nine patients (56%) in the alemtuzumab group compared to five (25%) in the control group developed neutropenia requiring MMF or valganciclovir dose reduction (or both). Absolute lymphocyte counts at 3 months were 340 +/- 200/mm3 and 890 +/- 544/ mm3 in the alemtuzumab and control groups, respectively (P = .001). There were two biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes (12.5%) in each group, and no difference in the incidence of infection. Creatinine clearance at 6 months was 58 mL/min in each group. Patient and kidney graft survival rates were both 94% in the alemtuzumab group (one death from cardiac arrest), compared with 100% patient and kidney graft survival rates in the control group (P = NS), with a mean follow-up of 9 and 11 months, respectively. The results of this pilot study suggest that similar short-term outcomes can be achieved using a rapid steroid elimination protocol with alemtuzumab induction therapy compared to rATG with steroids in patients receiving TAC and MMF maintenance therapy.     

Comparison of alemtuzumab vs. antithymocyte globulin induction therapy in primary non‐sensitized renal transplant patients treated with rapid steroid withdrawal

Alemtuzumab and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) are commonly used for induction therapy in renal transplantation. This retrospective, single‐center, cohort study evaluated cumulative incidence of one‐yr biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) among 200 consecutive primary non‐sensitized kidney transplant recipients who received either alemtuzumab (n = 100) or rATG (n = 100) induction followed by rapid steroid taper, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Protocol biopsies, plasma and urine BK virus PCR, serum creatinine and iothalamate glomerular filtration rate (iGFR), were obtained at 1, 4, and 12 months from transplantation. The one‐yr BPAR rates were similar between the alemtuzumab and rATG groups; however, rejection Banff IA and higher was more common in the alemtuzumab arm (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.047). After adjusting for confounding variables, alemtuzumab was still associated with Banff IA and higher rejection (adjusted OR: 3.7, CI: 1.2–10.5, p = 0.02). Despite similar rates of BK viremia, more patients in the alemtuzumab arm developed BK nephropathy (16% vs. 3%, p = 0.046). One‐year iGFR (53.4 ± 20.2 vs. 71.9 ± 27.2 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.002) and three‐yr graft survival (89.5% vs. 95%, p = 0.05) were lower in the alemtuzumab group. In low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients on steroid‐free immunosuppression, alemtuzumab was associated with more severe rejection and BK nephropathy compared to rATG.     

肝移植中应用巴利昔单抗诱导治疗的免疫抑制方案的疗效

目的 探讨肝移植中应用巴利昔单抗诱导治疗的免疫抑制方案的疗效。方法 2007年8月至2009年7月间139例成人肝移植受者接受含巴利昔单抗诱导的免疫抑制方案（诱导组）。以2006年1月至2006年12月间接受常规免疫抑制方案的106肝移植受者为对照组。术后随访12个月,记录两组受者排斥反应、代谢并发症的发生情况,以及患者的存活情况。结果 诱导组术后1个月内急性排斥反应、糖尿病、高血压及感染的发生率分别为7.9％、33.8％、21.6％和22.3％,对照组分别为15.1％、72.6％、40.6％和43.4％,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。术后12个月内,诱导组急性排斥反应、移植后新发糖尿病、高血压以及高脂血症的发生率分别为10.8％、5.0％、4.3％和7.9％,而对照组分别为19.8％、9.4％、8.5％和14.2％,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。诱导组和对照组术后1年的存活率分别为92.1％和88.7％(P＞0.05)。结论 免疫抑制方案中应用巴利昔单抗诱导治疗可以早期撤除皮质激素,并可降低急性排斥反应的发生率及减少使用皮质激素引起的不良反应。     

Herpes zoster infection after liver transplantation in patients receiving induction therapy with alemtuzumab

Abstract: Background: The incidence of herpes zoster (HZ) infection in liver transplant recipients prior to the use of induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies has been reported as being 1.2–18%. We studied the occurrence of HZ in liver transplant recipients that received induction therapy with alemtuzumab (Campath 1H^®). Material and methods: This was a retrospective review of primary liver transplant recipients who received alemtuzumab as induction therapy at our center. HZ infection was diagnosed clinically as the presence of a characteristic vesicular rash in a dermatomal distribution without any further virological confirmation. Results: A total of 118 liver transplant recipients were treated with alemtuzumab between August 2002 and August 2005. Twelve patients developed HZ infection, and the cumulative probability of a patient developing HZ infection by 36 months post‐transplant ±1 SE was estimated as 16.5 ± 5.0%. The median time for onset of the infection was 10.2 months (range 4.7–30.7) after the transplant. All patients had only one dermatomal distribution, and none developed systemic infection or complications such as postherpetic neuropathy. All patients except one were treated with systemic intravenous acyclovir. One patient received famciclovir. All of the patients had received ganciclovir during the post‐transplant period but were not receiving any other antiviral medication at the time of the infection. Conclusion: Herpes zoster infection has previously been reported as a frequent complication of liver transplantation. Our study suggests that it occurs in approximately 16% of patients receiving induction therapy with alemtuzumab. Although alemtuzumab is a powerful immunosuppressive agent and there is still little information regarding its long‐term safety when used in liver transplantation, our data do not suggest any increase in the occurrence and complications of HZ.     

Daclizumab induction therapy associated with tacrolimus-MMF has better outcome compared with tacrolimus-MMF alone in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

AIMS: Immunosuppression therapy for the control of immunologic rejection is a key aspect in liver transplantation. The objective of this study was to evaluate induction therapy with daclizumab (DAC) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in children. METHODS: We compared 2 different immunosuppression protocols in 30 children undergoing LDLT. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 12 patients received tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil (TAC-MMF), and 18 patients received tacrolimus with MMF and DAC induction therapy at days 0 and 14 after LDLT (DAC-TAC-MMF). Both groups were similar with regard to age, sex, weight, and indication for liver transplantation. The incidence of biopsy-proved rejection episodes, posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and renal dysfunction were evaluated. Tacrolimus levels at posttransplantation day 14 and at 2 months after transplantation were compared in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Acute rejection episodes were observed in 8 patients in the TAC-MMF group (66%), and none in the DAC-TAC-MMF group (0%; P < .05). Neither PTLD nor renal dysfunction was seen in any patient. Mean Tacrolimus level on posttransplantation day 14 was 10.67 +/- 5.4 ng/mL in the TAC-MMF group and 5.65 +/- 3.6 ng/mL in the DAC-TAC-MMF group (P < .05). After the second month the mean tacrolimus levels were 7.2 +/- 2.9 ng/mL and 6.8 +/- 3.5 ng/mL in the TAC-MMF and DAC-TAC-MMF groups, respectively. (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Induction therapy with DAC is safe and associated with a lower incidence of rejection episodes among children undergoing LDLT.     

Can daclizumab reduce acute rejection and improve long‐term renal function in tacrolimus‐based primary renal transplant recipients?

SUMMARY: Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a tacrolimus‐based immunosuppressive regimen with and without induction therapy using daclizumab in first cadaveric renal transplant recipients. Methods: Since January 2001, we studied the effect of daclizumab in a non‐randomized and prospective study of 36 sequential first cadaveric renal transplant recipients. They were compared with a historical control group of 21 sequential first cadaveric renal transplant recipients without induction therapy. All patients received tacrolimus, azathioprine and corticosteroids as concomitant immunosuppressive therapy. Daclizumab was given at 1 mg/kg infusion 2 h before transplantation and then every 14 days for four more doses. Outcomes measured included incidence of acute rejection, patient survival, graft survival, annualized change in creatinine clearance (CrCl), cardiovascular risk profile, infection and malignancy. Results: Fewer biopsy proven acute rejections were observed in the induction treatment group: 11.1% (4/36) versus 19% (4/21) but the rejection free survival was similar (P = 0.37). The patient survival and graft survival were comparable. The renal function was similar in both groups. There were also no significant difference in infection, malignancy and cardiovascular risk profile in both groups. Conclusion: Adding daclizumab to a tacrolimus‐based therapy is safe but cannot further improve clinical efficacy.