Toxic epidermal necrolysis with combination lamotrigine and valproate in bipolar disorder

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is the most severe and potentially life-threatening cutaneous reaction associated with lamotrigine. The risk of developing TEN during lamotrigine therapy is low and previously reported cases most involved epileptic patients. However, the risk of TEN with combination lamotrigine and valproate is greater than with monotherapy. We present here the emergence of TEN in a 32-year-old bipolar woman who was concomitantly treated with lamotrigine and valproate. The patient developed high fever, pharyngitis, cervical lymphadenopathy, mucosal sloughing, generalized erythematous eruptions and more than 40% epidermal detachment of the total body surface area (TBSA) after we added lamotrigine to her medications of valproate and trazodone. The patient's illness course was protracted and accompanied with hepatitis, pneumonitis and hematologic abnormalities. In the beginning of her illness course, our patient did not respond to antihistamine treatment. However, she made a full recovery without any sequela after she had received systemic corticosteroid and intensive resuscitation. Our case suggests that early use of systemic corticosteroid might be beneficial in treating TEN patients, if there is not any clinical contraindication.     

Mood stabilizers during breastfeeding: a review

BACKGROUND: The postpartum period is an exceptionally high-risk time for recurrence of depression, mania, or psychosis for women with bipolar disorder. Puerperal prophylaxis with mood stabilizers decreases this risk. To allow patients and clinicians to make informed decisions about mood-stabilizer use during breastfeeding, there is a need for a critical review and analysis of the data. DATA SOURCES: A search of MEDLINE (1966-1998) and the Lithium Database, Madison Institute of Medicine, was conducted to obtain articles about lithium, valproate, carbamazepine, gabapentin, or lamotrigine use during lactation. Search terms used were pregnancy, teratogenesis, breastfeeding, lactation, breast milk levels and lithium, anticonvulsants, mood stabilizers. No other search restrictions were used. Unpublished data on gabapentin and lamotrigine were provided by the manufacturers. RESULTS: The search revealed 11 cases of lithium use during breastfeeding, 8 of which reported infant serum levels. Two cases reported symptoms consistent with lithium toxicity in the infants. Thirty-nine cases of valproate use during breastfeeding were found, 8 of which reported infant serum levels. There was 1 report of thrombocytopenia and anemia in an infant. Fifty cases of carbamazepine use during breastfeeding were found, 10 of which reported infant serum levels. Two infants experienced hepatic dysfunction. One unpublished study of gabapentin in breast milk was found. Three reports of lamotrigine use during breastfeeding were found. DISCUSSION: Available information remains limited to uncontrolled studies and case reports. Carbamazepine and valproate, but not lithium, have generally been considered compatible with breastfeeding. The overall paucity of data, data confounded by polypharmacy and infant age differences, and adverse reactions reported with all established mood stabilizers dictate a reassessment of these recommendations. We propose that a woman's historical response to medication and the clinical circumstances be the primary considerations when choosing a mood stabilizer during breastfeeding, rather than strict adherence to categorical assignments.     

The reproductive safety profile of mood stabilizers, atypical antipsychotics, and broad-spectrum psychotropics

There has been growing concern about the potential iatrogenic effects of several newer psychotropic drugs on reproductive health safety in women. Areas of particular concern in this regard include (1) controversies about a potential association between the use of valproate and development of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), (2) the safety of use of newer psychotropic medications during pregnancy, and (3) safety issues with these medications in women while breastfeeding. This review summarizes current information about each of these areas. In particular, existing data suggest that (1) PCOS very likely represents a complex neuroendocrine disorder with multiple determinants; (2) menstrual irregularities may be a frequently seen phenomenon in women with bipolar illness, at least partially independent of psychotropic drug therapy; (3) potential central nervous system teratogenicity remains substantial during first-trimester exposure to valproate or carbamazepine; (4) with newer agents used for bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, safety data during pregnancy, while not definitive, are most abundant with olanzapine and with lamotrigine; relatively less is known about systematic pregnancy outcomes with other atypical antipsychotics or newer anticonvulsants; and (5) risks for neonatal safety during lactation continue to appear substantial with lithium, are of potential concern with lamotrigine and clozapine, are quite likely minimal with valproate or carbamazepine, and are indeterminate with most other new anticonvulsants or atypical antipsychotics. Recommendations are presented for clinical management in each of these instances.     

拉莫三嗪与丙戊酸钠治疗双相抑郁的对照研究

目的评价拉莫三嗪治疗双相障碍抑郁发作的效果和安全性。方法对107例双相障碍抑郁发作患者采用随机、平行分组、对照的方法分别以拉莫三嗪和丙戊酸钠治疗,疗程8周,以汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、临床疗效总评量表(CGI)在治疗前和治疗后第1、2、4、6、8周末评价疗效,同时采用治疗时出现的症状量表(TESS)进行安全性评估,在第1、2、4、6、8周末及需要时用Bech-Rafaelsen躁狂量表(BRMS)评定躁狂症状。结果拉莫三嗪组和丙戊酸钠组比较,两组有效率分别为75.5%和51.9%,治疗第6周和第8周末HAMD总分和减分率差异有统计学意义。治疗组不良反应明显较对照组发生率低。结论拉莫三嗪治疗双相障碍抑郁发作疗效优于丙戊酸钠,且前者不良反应较少,安全性高。     

Treatment-resistant bipolar disorder

Despite the remarkable increase in medications validated as effective in bipolar disorder, treatment is still plagued by inadequate response in acute manic or depressive episodes or in long-term preventive maintenance treatment. Established first-line treatments include lithium, valproate and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) in acute mania, and lithium and valproate as maintenance treatments. Recently validated treatments include extended release carbamazapine for acute mania and lamotrigine, olanzapine and aripiprazole as maintenance treatments. For treatment-resistant mania and as maintenance treatments, a number of newer anticonvulsants, and one older one, phenytoin, have shown some promise as effective. However, not all anticonvulsants are effective and each agent needs to be evaluated individually. Combining multiple agents is the most commonly used clinical strategy for treatment resistant bipolar patients despite a relative lack of data supporting its use, except for acute mania (for which lithium or valproate plus an SGA is optimal treatment). Other approaches that may be effective for treatment-resistant patients include high-dose thyroid augmentation, clozapine, calcium channel blockers and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Adjunctive psychotherapies show convincing efficacy using a variety of different techniques, most of which include substantial attention to education and enhancing coping strategies. Only recently, bipolar depression has become a topic of serious inquiry with the dominant controversy focusing on the place of antidepressants in the treatment of bipolar depression. Other than mood stabilizers alone or the combination of mood stabilizers and antidepressants, most of the approaches for treatment-resistant bipolar depression are relatively similar to those used in unipolar depression, with the possible exception of a more prominent place for SGAs, prescribed either alone or in combination with antidepressants. Future work in the area needs to explore the treatments commonly used by clinicians with inadequate research support, such as combination therapy and the use of antidepressants as both acute and adjunctive maintenance treatments for bipolar disorder.     

Lithium and anticonvulsants in bipolar depression

For decades, lithium and anticonvulsants have been widely used in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Their efficacy in the treatment of mania is recognized. These drugs have been initially evaluated in old and methodologically heterogeneous studies. Their efficacy in bipolar depression has not always been confirmed in more recent and methodologically more reliable studies. Thus, lithium's efficacy as monotherapy was challenged by the study of Young (2008) that showed a lack of efficacy compared with placebo in the treatment of bipolar depression. In two recent meta-analyses, valproate has shown a modest efficacy in the treatment of bipolar depression. As for lithium, valproate appeared to have a larger antimanic effect for acute phase and prophylaxis of bipolar disorder. In contrast, lamotrigine is more effective on the depressive pole of bipolar disorder with better evidence for the prevention of depressive recurrences. The guidelines include these recent studies and recommend lamotrigine as a first-line treatment of bipolar depression and for maintenance treatment. Because of more discordant data concerning lithium and valproate, these two drugs are placed either as first or as second line treatment of bipolar depression. The different safety/efficacy ratios of mood stabilizers underlie the complementarity and the importance of combination between them, or with some second-generation antipsychotics, in the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder.     

Is Anticonvulsant Treatment of Mania a Class Effect? Data from Randomized Clinical Trials

Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of anticonvulsant agents for the treatment of acute bipolar mania and ascertain if their effects on mania are a “class” effect. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with placebo or active comparator, in acute bipolar mania in order to summarize available data on anticonvulsant treatment of mania/mixed episodes. We searched (PubMed/MEDLINE) with the combination of the words “acute mania” and “clinical trials” with each one of the following words: “anticonvulsants/antiepileptics,”“valproic/valproate/divalproex,”“carbamazepine,”“oxcarbazepine,”“lamotrigine,”“gabapentin,”“topiramate,”“phenytoin,”“zonisamide,”“retigabine,”“pregabalin,”“tiagabine,”“levetiracetam,”“licarbazepine,”“felbamate,” and “vigabatrin.” Original articles were found until November 1, 2008. Data from 35 randomized clinical trials suggested that not all anticonvulsants are efficacious for the treatment of acute mania. Valproate showed greater efficacy in reducing manic symptoms, with response rates around 50% compared to a placebo effect of 20–30%. It appears to have a more robust antimanic effect than lithium in rapid cycling and mixed episodes. As valproate, the antimanic effects of carbamazepine have been demonstrated. Evidences did not support the efficacy of the gabapentin, topiramate as well as lamotrigine as monotherapy in acute mania and mixed episodes. Oxcarbazepine data are inconclusive and data regarding other anticonvulsants are not available. Anticonvulsants are not a class when treating mania. While valproate and carbamazepine are significantly more effective than placebo, gabapentin, topiramate, and lamotrigine are not. However, some anticonvulsants may be efficacious in treating some psychiatric comorbidities that are commonly associated to bipolar illness.     

Syndrome d’hypersensibilité aux antiépileptiques. Cas particulier de la lamotrigine

Anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS) is defined by the association of high fever, cutaneous rash and multiorgan-system abnormalities (incidence, one in 1000 to one in 10,000 exposures). Fatal complications are described in 10%. This reaction usually develops 1 to 12 weeks after initiation of an aromatic anticonvulsant. Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) can be discussed as differential diagnosis. Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain the pathogenesis of AHS. These include accumulation of toxic metabolites, antibody production and viral infection. The one based on toxic metabolites has found the greatest acceptance due to the fact that it can be proven by an in vitro test, the lymphocyte toxicity assay. In vivo, skin biopsies show characteristic findings of erythema multiform or typical leucocytoclastic angitis. The patch-test is positive in 80% of the cases. Lamotrigine-associated anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome (LASH) is rare and was described in 1998. We report two new cases demonstrating the two particular configurations of apparition of LASH found in the 14 cases from the review of literature (Pubmed: anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome - lamotrigine): high doses of lamotrigine (or lamotrigine in very young or old patients), and lamotrigine associated with another anti-epileptic (phenobarbital or sodium valproate). We discuss the links between DRESS after lamotrigine and LASH as illustrated in a new case.     

Unlike lithium, anticonvulsants and antidepressants do not alter rat brain myo-inositol

Lithium is the first-line in bipolar disorder treatment. Lithium's clinical efficacy might be due to its inhibition of myo-inositol turnover in the phosphatidylinositol second messenger system. This study aimed to determine whether this action can extend to antidepressants and anticonvulsants also used to treat bipolar symptoms. Male rats were treated for 2 weeks with an intraperitoneal injection of phenelzine, fluoxetine, desipramine, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, sodium valproate or vehicle. Brains were dissected and myo-inositol concentrations were analyzed using high-field nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 18.8 T and quantified using Chenomx Profiler software. Brain regions assessed included the prefrontal, temporal and occipital cortical areas as well as the hippocampus. The main finding is that contrary to lithium, the anticonvulsants and antidepressants do not alter brain myo-inositol concentration. This suggests that these agents might work via a mechanism that is not centered on changes in myo-inositol concentration.     

Valproate is associated with new-onset oligoamenorrhea with hyperandrogenism in women with bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary evidence suggests that valproate is associated with isolated features of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), while contradictory data support an association between epilepsy and PCOS. The development of PCOS features after initiation of valproate was therefore examined in women with bipolar disorder using a standardized definition of PCOS. METHODS: Three hundred women 18 to 45 years old with bipolar disorder were evaluated for PCOS at 16 Systematic Treatment Enhancement for Bipolar Disorder sites. A comparison was made between the incidence of hyperandrogenism (hirsutism, acne, male-pattern alopecia, elevated androgens) with oligoamenorrhea that developed while taking valproate versus other anticonvulsants (lamotrigine, topiramate, gabapentin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine) and lithium. Medication and menstrual cycle histories were obtained, and hyperandrogenism was assessed. RESULTS: Among 230 women who could be evaluated, oligoamenorrhea with hyperandrogenism developed in 9 (10.5%) of 86 women on valproate and in 2 (1.4%) of 144 women on a nonvalproate anticonvulsant or lithium (relative risk 7.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-34.1, p = .002). Oligoamenorrhea always began within 12 months of valproate use. CONCLUSIONS: Valproate is associated with new-onset oligoamenorrhea with hyperandrogenism. Monitoring for reproductive-endocrine abnormalities is important when starting and using valproate in reproductive-aged women. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate risk factors for development of PCOS on valproate.     

Lamotrigine and antiepileptic drugs as mood stabilizers in bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical trials literature on the use of antiepileptic drugs (AED) as mood stabilizers and to suggest an evidence-based approach when utilizing these agents in bipolar disorder. METHOD: The literature is reviewed and subdivided into the following sections: carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, valproate, lamotrigine, gabapentin and other AED, and discussion. RESULTS: Data exist to support the use of carbamazepine and valproate - and to a lesser extent, oxcarbazepine - in the management of acute manic episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. Lamotrigine, gabapentin, and other AED have not demonstrated consistent anti-manic effects. Clinical trials data favor lamotrigine over all other AED in the treatment of acute bipolar I depression and in rapid cycling bipolar disorder (particularly type II), although the absence of an active comparator in these lamotrigine trials must be noted. Lamotrigine, carbamazepine, and valproate all have evidence supporting their roles as potential long-term mood stabilizers to prevent bipolar relapse, with lamotrigine having a stronger effect in the prevention of depression. CONCLUSION: The AED are a heterogeneous group of medications with differential spectrum of efficacy in the treatment of bipolar disorder.     

Lamotrigine Monotherapy Improves Depressive Symptoms in Epilepsy: A Double-Blind Comparison with Valproate

Depressive symptoms are highly prevalent in patients with epilepsy. The antiepileptic drug lamotrigine has been shown to be an effective treatment for the depressive phase of bipolar disorder and to enhance mood and well-being in epilepsy patients. The effects of lamotrigine monotherapy on depressive symptoms in epilepsy have not been evaluated to date in a controlled clinical trial. A recently completed double-blind epilepsy trial comparing the effects of lamotrigine monotherapy and valproate monotherapy on weight change incorporated a battery of standard mood assessments. Mean screening Beck Depression Inventory scores showed that both lamotrigine and valproate groups suffered from mild depression at baseline. Lamotrigine monotherapy was reliably associated with earlier and larger improvements than valproate in mood assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory, the Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale, and the Profile of Mood States. Considered in the context of other data showing lamotrigine's antidepressant efficacy in bipolar depression, these results suggest that lamotrigine improves mood in mildly depressed patients with epilepsy. Lamotrigine may be particularly useful in treating epilepsy patients with comorbid depression, the most common psychiatric illness in epilepsy.     

Anticonvulsants and antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar disorder

Bipolar disorder is a complex medical condition, and up to the date there is no single treatment with proven efficacy in the control of all aspects of the illness. The available literature on the use of anticonvulsants (valproate, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, clonazepam) and atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole) for acute and prophylactic treatment of bipolar disorder was reviewed. There is a large amount of evidence that lithium is efficacious in the prophylaxis of episodes and better for acute mania than for depressive episodes. Other data show that carbamazepine and valproate are effective in acute manic episodes. Lamotrigine has been shown to reduce cycling and effective in depressive episodes. Based on the available data, olanzapine was found to be the most appropriate atypical antipsychotic agent for the treatment of manic bipolar patients, although there are also studies suggesting the efficacy of risperidone, aripiprazole and clozapine. The preliminary data evaluating the efficacy of quetiapine and ziprasidone in bipolar disorder are still very limited. There is no consistent information supporting the prophylactic use of newer antipsychotics.     

Newer prophylactic agents for bipolar disorder and their influence on suicidality.

Different from lithium, there is little known so far on the effect of (newer) anticonvulsants on suicidality in bipolar patients. We evaluated data of 128 patients with bipolar disorders for suicidal ideation. These patients were treated with various mood-stabilizing medications for at least 3 months. No suicide attempt or completed suicide occurred in this cohort during prospective follow up for an average of 13.3 +/- 12.1 years. Compared to lithium, the relative risk of suicidal ideation was numerically slightly higher for valproate, carbamazepine and a small group treated with either levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine or topiramate, but lower in patients treated with lamotrigine, without reaching statistical significance. Confounding variables in more intensive care of these patients participating in a naturalistic study may blur small differences and contribute to a generally favorable outcome.     

Combined use of lamotrigine and electroconvulsive therapy in bipolar depression: a case series

OBJECTIVE: Lamotrigine and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) are both safe and effective treatments for bipolar depression. Concerns exist that anticonvulsants may interfere with seizure expression during ECT or may exacerbate cognitive side effects, potentially affecting clinical response. This report examines the clinical use of concurrent ECT and lamotrigine for acute bipolar depression and the transition to maintenance therapy. METHODS: Nine patients with acute bipolar depression were simultaneously treated with a course of ECT while titrating lamotrigine for maintenance therapy. We compared mean stimulus intensity, mean seizure duration, and mean time to orientation after treatment for each patient during treatment with their highest and lowest lamotrigine dose. RESULTS: All 9 patients were treated to remission. From the lowest daily dose to the highest daily dose, mean increase in lamotrigine was 102.8 mg. Clinically adequate seizures were obtained in each patient. Lamotrigine had minimal effect on each measured ECT parameter. The interval between ECT treatments was spaced to a mean of 15.2 days. The treatment combination was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events, no rashes, and no worsening of cognitive side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent use of lamotrigine with ECT in bipolar depression seems safe, did not interfere with routine ECT practice, and allowed for transition to maintenance pharmacotherapy.     

Rash in multicenter trials of lamotrigine in mood disorders: clinical relevance and management

BACKGROUND: The rate of lamotrigine-associated rash in patients with mood disorders has not been well characterized. The objective of this report was to determine rash rates in clinical trials of lamotrigine in DSM-IV unipolar depression or bipolar disorder. METHOD: A retrospective analysis was conducted of rates of lamotrigine-related rash in 12 multicenter studies, including 1 open study, 7 randomized controlled acute trials, and 4 randomized controlled maintenance trials from 1996 to 2001. RESULTS: A total of 1955 patients were treated with lamotrigine in open-label settings (open-label phases preceding or following randomization and 1 stand-alone open-label study); 1198 patients received lamotrigine in controlled settings, and 1056 patients received placebo. In controlled settings, rates of benign rash were 8.3% and 6.4% in lamotrigine- and placebo-treated patients, respectively. Rates of serious rash were 0% with lamotrigine, 0.1% (N = 1) with placebo, and 0% with comparators. In the open-label setting, the overall rate of rash for lamotrigine was 13.1% (N = 257) and of serious rash, 0.1% (N = 2). One mild case of Stevens-Johnson syndrome not requiring hospitalization occurred in a patient treated with lamotrigine. There were no cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis in any setting. CONCLUSION: Serious drug eruptions associated with lamotrigine were rare. Although rash is a potentially life-threatening reaction, the risk of serious rash due to lamotrigine should be weighed against more common risks associated with untreated or undertreated bipolar depression.     

Newer Prophylactic Agents for Bipolar Disorder and Their Influence on Suicidality

ABSTRACT

Different from lithium, there is little known so far on the effect of (newer) anticonvulsants on suicidality in bipolar patients. We evaluated data of 128 patients with bipolar disorders for suicidal ideation. These patients were treated with various mood-stabilizing medications for at least 3 months. No suicide attempt or completed suicide occurred in this cohort during prospective follow up for an average of 13.3 ± 12.1 years. Compared to lithium, the relative risk of suicidal ideation was numerically slightly higher for valproate, carbamazepine and a small group treated with either levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine or topiramate, but lower in patients treated with lamotrigine, without reaching statistical significance. Confounding variables in more intensive care of these patients participating in a naturalistic study may blur small differences and contribute to a generally favorable outcome.     

Therapie von Epilepsien im Kindes- und Jugendalter

Therapeutic strategies for treating epilepsy in childhood and adolescence markedly depend on the underlying electroclinical syndromes. In self-limiting epilepsies with focal seizures of genetic or unknown etiology, e.g. benign infantile seizures, rolandic epilepsy and Panayiotopoulos syndrome, a considerable number of patients may not require any pharmacological therapy but if they do, sulthiame, levetiracetam or oxcarbazepine should easily control seizures. Early application of corticosteroids should be considered in atypical forms, such as pseudo-Lennox syndrome, syndrome of continuous spike waves in sleep (CSWS) and Landau-Kleffner syndrome. Lamotrigine, slow release oxcarbazepine and levetiracetam are drugs of first choice for treating focal seizures in epilepsy of structural/metabolic or unknown causes. Various antiepileptic drugs are available in case of difficulties in controlling seizures; however, the possibility of epilepsy surgery should be evaluated early in these cases. Ethosuximide is the first line drug in childhood absence while valproate is the most effective drug in juvenile absence epilepsy and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Because of the lower teratogenic risk an initial trial with lamotrigine, possibly combined with levetiracetam is justified in girls. Valproate, lamotrigine and ethosuximide are the most important options in myoclonic atonic epilepsy. In addition, a ketogenic diet is a promising option. While corticosteroids and vigabatrin should be administered for infantile spasms, valproate is the basis for different combinations in the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Efficacy of lamotrigine, topiramate, rufinamide, clobazam and felbamate has been shown in placebo-controlled randomized trials. Vagus nerve stimulation and ketogenic diets are further options. In cases of Dravet syndrome early treatment with either bromide or valproate in combination with clobazam and stiripentol should be established. Combinations of valproate, topiramate and bromide and ketogenic can be effective. In general, the increasing number of available anticonvulsants allows an individually optimized therapeutic strategy in many cases, considering gender, age, body weight, behavior and cognition. Maintaining the best possible development should always be a major issue in the treatment of childhood epilepsy.