Antitumor activity of rituximab plus thalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

We evaluated a treatment strategy targeting both lymphoma cells (by rituximab) and the microenvironment (by thalidomide) in 16 patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Rituximab was administered at 375 mg/m(2) for 4 weekly doses concomitantly with thalidomide (200 mg daily, with a dose increment to 400 mg on day 15), which was continued as maintenance therapy until progression/relapse. Thirteen patients (81%) experienced an objective response, with 5 complete responders (31%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 20.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3-23.6 months), and estimated 3-year survival was 75%. In patients achieving a complete response, PFS after rituximab plus thalidomide was longer than PFS after the preceding chemotherapy. Severe adverse events included 2 thromboembolic events and 1 grade IV neutropenia associated with thalidomide. Our results suggest that rituximab plus thalidomide has marked antitumor activity in relapsed/refractory MCL and a low toxicity profile, which warrants further evaluation in MCL.     

Outcomes of bendamustine- or cyclophosphamide-based first-line chemotherapy in older patients with indolent B-cell lymphoma

Clinical trials comparing bendamustine/rituximab (BR) with cyclophosphamide-based regimens (RCHOP/RCVP) have pooled various histologies of indolent B-cell lymphomas. We examined real-life outcomes of older patients with follicular (FL), mantle cell (MCL), or marginal zone/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (MZL/LPL), treated with these first-line regimens. We identified Medicare beneficiaries with FL, MCL, or MZL/LPL, who received either first-line BR or RCHOP/RCVP in 2009-2016, and matched groups using a propensity score. Outcomes of claims-based event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, secondary cancers, and costs were compared in the aggregate cohort (N = 2736), and in separately matched histology-specific subcohorts. In the aggregate cohort, EFS was better with BR than with RCHOP/RCVP (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.87). Acute toxicity was lower with BR, including rates of hospitalizations (33% vs 45%), infections (21% vs 30%), cardiovascular events, and transfusions, yet OS did not differ (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.91-1.17) and Medicare spending was higher. There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of secondary cancers (subhazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.83-1.48). The EFS advantage of BR was pronounced in MCL (N = 690; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.76), but less so in FL (N = 1330; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98) and absent in MZL/LPL (N = 574; HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.73-1.17). Despite improved EFS and lower toxicity, the shift from RCHOP/RCVP to BR in clinical practice did not improve OS for older patients with indolent B-cell lymphomas. Frequent infections and hospitalizations underscore the need for safer treatment approaches in this population. Secondary cancers do not appear to be increased after BR compared with RCHOP/RCVP.     

Mantle cell lymphoma epidemiology: a population-based study in France

Only limited population-based data are available on mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), a relatively rare and aggressive mature B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) entity. We conducted an epidemiological study based on the three French registries devoted to haematological malignancies over the period 2002–2006. Main clinical features and management characteristics were collected. Incidence and survival rates were estimated, and independent prognostic factors were analysed. MCL was diagnosed in 135 patients between 2002 and 2006. Seventy-four percent of patients were men. Age-standardised incidence rate of MCL (per 100,000) was 1.1 in men and 0.26 in women. Median age at diagnosis was 72 years (range 30–92). Advanced-stage (III or IV) disease was diagnosed in 81.5 % of patients, and 55 % of them were identified as high risk according to MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI). Median net survival time was 41 months (95 % confidence interval (CI), 38–62). Main independent prognostic factors were age at diagnosis, performance status and use of rituximab in first-line treatment. Median overall survival was 36 months (95 % CI, 27–40) for high MIPI and 60 months (95 % CI, 35–74) for low/intermediate MIPI patients (p?=?0.02). This study confirms that MCL remains an aggressive NHL with a median overall survival less than 4 years and demonstrates that the use of rituximab has modified overall survival duration.     

Concomitant statin use does not impair the clinical outcome of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with rituximab-CHOP

Preclinical data indicated a detrimental effect of statins on the anti-lymphoma activity of rituximab. We evaluated the impact of concomitant statin medication on the response and survival of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving rituximab–cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) as first-line therapy. Medical histories of patients with DLBCL who were treated with R-CHOP as first-line therapy were assessed for concomitant statin use, response after completion of chemotherapy, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, 2-[¹⁸F]fluor-2-deoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT results after completion of first-line therapy were compared between the groups. Overall, 145 patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP from January 2001 to December 2009 were analyzed. Twenty-one (15%) patients received statins throughout therapy. Five-year EFS was 67.3% in patients without statins compared with 79% in patients receiving statins during R-CHOP (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.15–1.54, p?=?0.2). Five-year OS was 81.4% for patients without statins compared with 93.3% for patients taking statins (HR, 0.58; 95% CI 0.07–4.55, p?=?0.6). There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of complete remissions between the two groups (75% in the non-statin group versus 86% in the statin group, p?=?0.45). A trend toward a lower rate of complete metabolic responses in FDG-PET/CT after chemotherapy was seen in patients without statin medication compared with the patients taking statins (84% versus 92%, p?=?0.068). Concomitant statin use had no adverse impact on response to chemotherapy, EFS, and OS in patients treated with R-CHOP for DLBCL.     

Rituximab improves the treatment results of DHAP-VIM-DHAP and ASCT in relapsed/progressive aggressive CD20+ NHL: a prospective randomized HOVON trial

We evaluated the role of rituximab during remission induction chemotherapy in relapsed aggressive CD20+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Of 239 patients, 225 were evaluable for analysis. Randomized to DHAP (cisplatin-cytarabine-dexamethasone)-VIM (etoposide-ifosfamide-methotrexate)-DHAP (cisplatin-cytarabine-dexamethasone) chemotherapy with rituximab (R; R-DHAP arm) were 119 patients (113 evaluable) and to chemotherapy without rituximab (DHAP arm) 120 patients (112 evaluable). Patients in complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) after 2 chemotherapy courses were eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. After the second chemotherapy cycle, 75% of the patients in the R-DHAP arm had responsive disease (CR or PR) versus 54% in the DHAP arm (P=.01). With a median follow-up of 24 months, there was a significant difference in failure-free survival (FFS24; 50% vs 24% vs, P<.001), and progression free survival (PFS24; 52% vs 31% P<.002) in favor of the R-DHAP arm. Cox-regression analysis demonstrated a significant effect of rituximab treatment on FFS24 (HR 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.57 versus 0.51, 95% CI 0.37-0.70) and overall-survival (OS24: HR 0.60 [0.41-0.89] vs 0.76 [0.52-1.10]) when adjusted for time since upfront treatment, age, World Health Organization performance status, and secondary age-adjusted international prognostic index. These results demonstrate improved FFS and PFS for relapsed aggressive B-cell NHL if rituximab is added to the re-induction chemotherapy regimen.     

Rituximab combined with chemotherapy and interferon in follicular lymphoma patients: results of the GELA-GOELAMS FL2000 study

The FL2000 study was undertaken to evaluate the combination of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab with chemotherapy plus interferon in the first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma patients with a high tumor burden. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 12 courses of the chemotherapy regimen CHVP (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, etoposide, and prednisolone) plus interferon-alpha2a (CHVP+I arm) over 18 months or 6 courses of the same chemotherapy regimen combined with 6 infusions of 375 mg/m(2) rituximab and interferon for the same time period (R-CHVP+I arm). After a median follow-up of 5 years, event-free survival estimates were, respectively, 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29%-44%) and 53% (95% CI, 45%-60%) in the CHVP+I and R-CHVP+I arm (P = .001). Five-year overall survival estimates were not statistically different in the CHVP+I (79%; 95% CI, 72%-84%) and R-CHVP+I (84%; 95% CI, 78%-84%) arms. In a multivariate regression analysis, event-free survival was significantly influenced by both the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score (hazard ratio = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.6%-2.8%) and the treatment arm (hazard ratio = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44%-0.78%). With a 5-year follow-up, the combination of rituximab with CHVP+I provides superior disease control in follicular lymphoma patients despite a shorter duration of chemotherapy. This study's clinical trial was registered at the National Institutes of Health website as no. NCT00136552.     

R-hyper-CVAD versus R-CHOP/cytarabine with high-dose therapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell support in fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma: 20 years of single-center experience

Standard of care for untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is still debated. At the University Hospital Zurich, advanced MCL in physically fit patients is treated either with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone induction followed by consolidating high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell support (R-CHOP/HD-ASCT), or with rituximab plus fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone alternating with high-dose methotrexate-cytarabine (R-hyper-CVAD/MTX-AraC) without consolidating HD-ASCT upon physicians’ and patients’ choice. We retrospectively analysed the outcome and therapy tolerance in patients with MCL treated with R-CHOP/HD-ASCT or R-hyper-CVAD/MTX-AraC at the University Hospital Zurich between January 1996 and January 2016. Forty-three patients were included; 29 patients received R-CHOP/HD-ASCT and 14 patients R-hyper-CVAD/MTX-AraC. Mean age at diagnosis was 54.4 years (range 38–68 years). Thirty-five patients (81.4%) completed the entire first-line therapy (n?=?24 in the R-CHOP/HD-ASCT group, n?=?11 in the R-hyper-CVAD group). Of those, all patients responded and 97% achieved a complete remission (CR). With a mean follow-up of 5.7 years 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 32% and overall survival (OS) was 76%, with no difference between the two therapy groups. Complication-induced hospitalisation rate, haematological toxicity and economic burden were significantly higher in the R-hyper-CVAD therapy group. In contrast, quality of life and global health state were better in the R-hyper-CVAD therapy group. Both first-line therapies showed similar outcome with a median OS longer than 10 years. Due to significantly lower haematological toxicity and lower economic burden, we recommend R-CHOP/HD-ASCT as first-line therapy in fit adult patients with advanced MCL.     

Monoclonal antibody therapy for B-cell lymphoma: clinical trials of an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody for B-cell lymphoma in Japan

Twelve patients with relapsed CD20+ B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) were enrolled in a phase I study of rituximab; 4 received rituximab 250 mg/m2 and 8 received rituximab 375 mg/m2 once weekly for 4 weeks. Grade 1 or 2 infusion-related toxicity was observed. Of the 11 eligible patients, 2 achieved complete responses and 5 achieved partial responses. The elimination half-life (T1/2) of rituximab was 445 +/- 361 hours, and serum rituximab levels were detectable at 3 months. Thereafter, 90 relapse patients with indolent B-NHL or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) were enrolled in a phase II study and treated with rituximab at 375 mg/m2 per infusion in 4 weekly infusions. Sixteen patients were ineligible in protocol compatible analyses. The overall response rates (ORR) in indolent B-NHL and MCL were 61% (37 of 61 patients) and 46% (6 of 13 patients), respectively. Factors affecting response and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed for 77 patients whose histopathology was centrally confirmed as indolent B-NHL or MCL. The ORR in patients receiving 1 prior chemotherapy regimen was higher than the ORR in those receiving > or = 2 regimens (P < .05). The median PFS was shorter in MCL patients, in those with extranodal disease, and in those receiving > or = 2 prior chemotherapy regimens (P < .01). The PFS of patients with higher serum rituximab levels (> or = 70 microg/mL) immediately before the third infusion was longer than that of other patients (P < .01). Several pretreatment factors and serum rituximab levels are useful for predicting the efficacy of rituximab monotherapy. Rituximab re-treatment was well tolerated in 13 patients with no grade 3 or 4 nonhematological toxicities. A partial response was observed in 5 patients (38%), and the median PFS after re-treatment was 5.1 months. In conclusion, rituximab is a highly effective agent in relapsed indolent and aggressive B-NHL and MCL and has acceptable toxicities.     

Updated survival analysis of two sequential prospective trials of R‐MACLO‐IVAM followed by maintenance for newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma

A phase II trial of R‐MACLO‐IVAM followed by thalidomide maintenance for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) demonstrated promising progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. Thalidomide maintenance was associated with significant toxicity and was subsequently modified to rituximab maintenance. Herein, we present updated results and follow‐up. Two sequential phase II trials included chemotherapy‐naïve patients with MCL up to 75 years old. Four cycles of R‐MACLO‐IVAM chemotherapy were delivered as previously described. Patients who achieved complete responses (CR) were eligible for thalidomide or rituximab maintenance therapy. Among 36 patients enrolled, the MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) was low in 53%, intermediate in 36% and high in 11%. Thirty‐five patients completed at least 2 cycles of chemotherapy; 34 (94%) achieved a CR. After a median follow‐up of 74.4 months, the 5‐year PFS was 51% (95% CI 33–68%) and the 5‐year OS was 85% (95% CI 73–97%). Two deaths occurred during the chemotherapy phase due to disease progression and neutropenic sepsis, respectively. One patient developed secondary acute myeloid leukemia after 7 years. R‐MACLO‐IVAM chemotherapy is effective for patients with newly diagnosed MCL. Am. J. Hematol. 90:E111–E116, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Treatment of B cell lymphoma with chemotherapy plus rituximab: a survival benefit can be demonstrated in the routine data of a regional cancer registry

Combination of standard chemotherapy with rituximab led to improved disease control in patients with B cell lymphoma in clinical trials. We wanted to know if a similar benefit could be demonstrated in the routine data of a regional population-based cancer registry. We searched the registry of the Regensburg Tumor Center for B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas diagnosed between 1998 and 2006 and compared overall survival of patients receiving any first-line chemotherapy with or without rituximab. Comparing registry data to death certificates, an 86% coverage within the registry was estimated. In the aggressive lymphoma group, 133 patients received rituximab-containing chemotherapy resulting in a 5-year survival of 69.6%, whereas 205 patients received chemotherapy alone with a significantly inferior 5-year survival of 56.8%. First-line chemotherapy with rituximab in 81 patients with indolent lymphoma also led to improved 5-year survival compared to 134 patients without rituximab (69.7% vs. 51.8%), primarily observed among patients with follicular lymphoma (84.7% vs. 52.0%). These data confirm the standard use of rituximab as first-line therapy in diffuse large B cell lymphomas as well as in indolent lymphoma. Furthermore, they support the collection of treatment data including detailed information on systemic therapy in cancer registries to be used for outcomes research.     

Autologous stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma: a report from the SFGM-TC

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered as an attractive treatment option for young mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients. This retrospective SFGM-TC study analyzed the outcome of 500 MCL patients treated with ASCT and investigated parameters that may modify the outcome of patients who proceeded to ASCT upfront (n?=?396). For all patients, median age at ASCT was 56 years (range, 26–71). Median follow-up was 34 months. Three-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 63.5 % [95 % CI, 58.7–68.6 %] and 79.5 % [95 % CI, 75.3–83.4 %], respectively. Median time from ASCT to relapse was 22 months (range, 0–136 m). For patients transplanted upfront and in multivariate analysis, age (HR?=?2 [1.2–3.4], p?=?.01, and HR?=?2.3 [1.2–4.5], p?=?.01), disease status at time of ASCT (HR?=?1.7 [1.1–2.6], p?=?.01 and HR?=?1.8 [1.1–3.1], p?=?.03), and use of rituximab (HR?=?0.5 [0.3–0.8], p?=?.002 and HR?=?0.5 [0.3–0.9], p?=?.01) were statistically predictive for both PFS and OS. Also, first line treatment including anthracycline and high-dose cytarabine followed by ASCT conditioned with TAM improved PFS. To conclude, this study suggests that ASCT in MCL can provide a high response rate but may not be sufficient to cure MCL even when ASCT is performed upfront, highlighting the need for innovative approaches before ASCT, aiming to increase complete response rate, and after ASCT, to maintain response.     

Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: a Lymphoma Study Association retrospective study

Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma represents a distinct entity from classical Hodgkin lymphoma. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the management of patients with nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcome of adult patients with nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma were collected in Lymphoma Study Association centers. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed, and the competing risks formulation of a Cox regression model was used to control the effect of risk factors on relapse or death as competing events. Among 314 evaluable patients, 82.5% had early stage nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Initial management consisted in watchful waiting (36.3%), radiotherapy (20.1%), rituximab (8.9%), chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy (21.7%), combined modality treatment (12.7%), or radiotherapy plus rituximab (0.3%). With a median follow-up of 55.8 months, the 10-year PFS and OS estimates were 44.2% and 94.9%, respectively. The 4-year PFS estimates were 79.6% after radiotherapy, 77.0% after rituximab alone, 78.8% after chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy, and 93.9% after combined modality treatment. For the whole population, early treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, but not rituximab alone (Hazard ratio 0.695 [0.320–1.512], P=0.3593) significantly reduced the risk of progression compared to watchful waiting (HR 0.388 [0.234–0.643], P=0.0002). Early treatment appears more beneficial compared to watchful waiting in terms of progression-free survival, but has no impact on overall survival. Radiotherapy in selected early stage nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma, and combined modality treatment, chemotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy for other patients, are the main options to treat adult patients with a curative intent.     

Patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma in partial response or stable disease after first-line R-CHOP: the prognostic value of the absolute lymphocyte count and impact of autologous stem cell transplantation

Certain portions of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) do not achieve a complete remission after first-line rituximab combining chemotherapy. This retrospective study aimed to characterize the outcome of patients with DLBCL that achieved partial remission or had stable disease after first-line R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone). The effects of subsequent treatments and factors associated with event-free survival (EFS) after second-line treatments were analyzed. A total of 103 patients were enrolled and 81 (76.8?%) patients received intensive chemotherapy, whereas the others (23.2?%) received either palliative chemotherapy or supportive care post first-line treatment. Patients receiving intensive chemotherapy had significantly higher EFS (median 7.9?months) than the others; 28 (34.6?%) patients in this group received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), which may have further improved the EFS. An International Prognostic Index (IPI) >2 and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) at diagnosis <1,000/UL were significant prognostic factors associated with worse EFS. The survival advantage of ASCT remained significant after adjustment for these factors. The results suggest intensive chemotherapy plus ASCT may provide modest disease control in patients with DLBCL who achieve PR or SD to first-line R-CHOP, particularly in those with a higher IPI score and/or low ALC at diagnosis.     

Rituximab retherapy in patients with relapsed aggressive B cell and mantle cell lymphoma

Neither effective salvage regimens nor the outcome and response to retherapy with rituximab containing chemotherapy have been defined for rituximab pre-treated patients with relapsing aggressive lymphoma. We report here a single-centre retrospective outcome analysis of second-line immunochemotherapy with rituximab. In 28 patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphomas, first-line immunochemotherapy had induced objective responses in 18 patients. Nine of 28 patients responded to rituximab containing salvage therapy, leading to a median overall survival of 243 days after start of second immunochemotherapy. Long-term disease free survivors (1,260 and 949 days) were restricted to the group of twelve patients that had received allogeneic stem cell transplantation as consolidation therapy. In 21 patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphomas (MCL), 19 patients had reached remissions with first-line therapy. Of those, 16 patients experienced responses to salvage therapy with a median overall survival of 226 days. Noteworthy, none of patients with initial non-responding disease reached a remission with second immunochemotherapy. Seven patients with MCL stayed free from progression after high-dose therapy with autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation in two and five cases, respectively. In summary, responses to repeated immunotherapy with rituximab were observed in approximately one third and two thirds of initially responding patients with aggressive B cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma, respectively, but not in primarily refractory disease. Lasting remissions were achieved only by high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell transplantation.     

Current strategies in the treatment of advanced stage mantle cell lymphoma

Advanced stage mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) with a median survival of only three years and virtually no long-term survivors represents the lymphoma subtype with the poorest prognosis and remains incurable with conventional chemotherapy. Recently two randomized trials of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG) demonstrated the superiority of a combined immunochemotherapy with the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab in first-line therapy (R-CHOP) as well as in relapsed disease (R-FCM). In addition, in a trial of the European MCL Network, intensified-consolidation with high-dose radiochemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation significantly improved the progression-free survival in patients up to 65 years of age. However, the vast majority of patients with MCL will eventually relapse. Thus, new strategies such as allogenic transplantation after dose-reduced conditioning or novel molecular targeting agents (e. g. proteasome inhibitors or radiolabeled antibodies) are urgently warranted to further improve the long-term outcome of MCL.     

Rituximab: enhancing stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) responds poorly to standard chemotherapy regimens used in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. As a result, a combination of high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is being investigated in patients with MCL. So far, however, there is no evidence for long-term remission -- believed, in part, to be due to contamination of the transfusion product with residual cancer cells. Many ex-vivo purging methods have been developed to remove tumour cells, but these are complicated, time-consuming and expensive. This study describes an in vivo purging method using rituximab to produce a tumour-free stem cell product for re-infusion following HDT. The regimen is split into a purging phase and a myeloablative phase, which together consist of four-step high-dose sequential chemotherapy (sHDT) and six infusions of rituximab immunotherapy. The sHDT comprises cyclophosphamide, cytosine arabinoside, melphalan and mitoxantrone plus melphalan. There are two separate stem cell harvests and three reinfusions. In a pilot study 28 patients with untreated MCL received standard chemotherapy followed by sHDT with rituximab in vivo purging. Preliminary results indicate that in PCR analyses of leukaphereses from 20 assessable patients, 100% lymphoma-negative harvests were achieved following in vivo purging. PCR analyses of the bone marrow following the four-step high-dose regimen with purging and transplantation showed that all patients achieved molecular remission. After a median follow-up of 22 months (range 10-42 months), two patients had died while 26 were alive and disease free. This method allows efficient in vivo purging in the context of an effective chemotherapy regimen and may have a role as first-line therapy in MCL patients who respond poorly to standard treatment.     

Comparative outcomes of rituximab-based systemic therapy and splenectomy in splenic marginal zone lymphoma

Despite diagnostic and therapeutic advances, the majority of patients with splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) are still treated with splenectomy. We analyzed survival outcomes after surgery or rituximab-based systemic therapy in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database, using inverse probability of treatment weighting to minimize treatment selection bias. From the 657 recorded cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2007, with a median age of 77 years, we selected 227 eligible patients treated with splenectomy (68 %), rituximab alone (23 %), or in combination with chemotherapy (9 %) within 2 years from diagnosis. No significant difference between the groups was observed in the cumulative incidence of lymphoma-related death (LRD) at 3 years (19.6 % with systemic therapy and 17.3 % with splenectomy; hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.56–1.92; P?=?0.90) or in the overall survival (HR, 1.01; 95 % CI, 0.66–1.55; P?=?0.95). The 90-day mortality after splenectomy was 7.1 %. The rates of hospitalizations, infections, transfusions, and cardiovascular or thromboembolic events were higher after combination chemoimmunotherapy than after splenectomy. Conversely, there was no significant difference in most complications between groups treated with splenectomy or rituximab alone. The cumulative incidence of LRD after single-agent rituximab at 3 years was 18.7 % (95 % CI, 8.6–31.7). In conclusion, in SMZL patients over the age of 65 years, the risk of LRD and overall survival are similar with systemic therapy or splenectomy as initial therapy. Single-agent rituximab may offer the most favorable risk/benefit ratio in this population.     

A phase II clinical trial of intensive chemotherapy followed by consolidative stem cell transplant: long-term follow-up in newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is associated with high relapse rates and poor survival when treated with conventional chemotherapy, with or without rituximab. We report the long-term follow-up of a phase II clinical trial using a new intensive multiagent chemotherapeutic regimen [cyclophosphamide, teniposide, doxorubicin and prednisone (CTAP) alternating with vincristine and high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine (VMAC)] in newly diagnosed MCL. Following 4–6 cycles of CTAP/VMAC induction, patients aged ≤65 years proceeded to consolidative autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT), while patients ≤55 years who had a HLA-identical sibling received allogeneic-HSCT (busulfan/cyclophosphamide conditioning for both). Twenty-five untreated MCL patients enrolled on the protocol between 1997 and 2002. Among evaluable patients, overall response rate (ORR) was 74% following induction chemotherapy. Seventeen patients received HSCT (autologous-13/allogeneic-4). On intent-to-treat analysis, ORR for patients who received consolidative HSCT was 100% (complete remission 76%). Therapy was well-tolerated with 4% treatment-related mortality (including HSCT). The 5-year event-free-survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients was 35% and 50% respectively. Furthermore, at 66-months median follow-up, the 5-year EFS and OS for patients who received consolidative auto-HSCT was 54% and 75% respectively. Patients who received auto-HSCT had improved outcomes compared to no auto-HSCT (EFS P  = 0·001; OS P  = 0·0002). CTAP/VMAC induction followed by consolidative auto-HSCT for newly diagnosed MCL is associated with high ORR and durable survival.     

Targeting intratumoral B cells with rituximab in addition to CHOP in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. A clinicobiological study of the GELA

Background In angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, symptoms linked to B-lymphocyte activation are common, and variable numbers of CD20(+) large B-blasts, often infected by Epstein-Barr virus, are found in tumor tissues. We postulated that the disruption of putative B-T interactions and/or depletion of the Epstein-Barr virus reservoir by an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) could improve the clinical outcome produced by conventional chemotherapy. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-five newly diagnosed patients were treated, in a phase II study, with eight cycles of rituximab + chemotherapy (R-CHOP21). Tumor infiltration, B-blasts and Epstein-Barr virus status in tumor tissue and peripheral blood were fully characterized at diagnosis and were correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS: A complete response rate of 44% (95% CI, 24% to 65%) was observed. With a median follow-up of 24 months, the 2-year progression-free survival rate was 42% (95% CI, 22% to 61%) and overall survival rate was 62% (95% CI, 40% to 78%). The presence of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (14/21 patients) correlated with Epstein-Barr virus score in lymph nodes (P<0.004) and the detection of circulating tumor cells (P=0.0019). Despite peripheral Epstein-Barr virus clearance after treatment, the viral load at diagnosis (>100 copy/μg DNA) was associated with shorter progression-free survival (P=0.06). Conclusions We report here the results of the first clinical trial targeting both the neoplastic T cells and the microenvironment-associated CD20(+) B lymphocytes in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, showing no clear benefit of adding rituximab to conventional chemotherapy. A strong relationship, not previously described, between circulating Epstein-Barr virus and circulating tumor cells is highlighted.     

Mantle cell lymphoma: 2015 update on diagnosis,risk‐stratification,and clinical management

Disease Overview : Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a non‐Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by involvement of the lymph nodes, spleen, blood and bone marrow with a short remission duration to standard therapies and a median overall survival (OS) of 4‐5 years. Diagnosis : Diagnosis is based on lymph node, bone marrow, or tissue morphology of centrocytic lymphocytes, small cell type, or blastoid variant cells. A chromosomal translocation t (11:14) is the molecular hallmark of MCL, resulting in the overexpression of cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 is detected by immunohistochemistry in 98% of cases. The absence of SOX‐11 or a low Ki‐67 may correlate with a more indolent form of MCL. The differential diagnosis of MCL includes small lymphocytic lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma. Risk Stratification : The MCL International Prognostic Index (MIPI) is the prognostic model most often used and incorporates ECOG performance status, age, leukocyte count, and lactic dehydrogenase. A modification of the MIPI also adds the Ki‐67 proliferative index if available. The median OS for the low‐risk group was not reached (5‐year OS of 60%). The median OS for the intermediate risk group was 51 months and 29 months for the high risk group. Risk‐Adapted Therapy : For selected indolent, low MIPI MCL patients, initial observation may be appropriate therapy. For younger patients with intermediate or high risk MIPI MCL, aggressive therapy with a cytotoxic regimen ± autologous stem cell transplantation should be considered. For older MCL patients with intermediate or high risk MIPI, combination chemotherapy with R‐CHOP, R‐Bendamustine, or a clinical trial should be considered. In addition, rituximab maintenance therapy may prolong the progression‐free survival. At the time of relapse, agents directed at activated pathways in MCL cells such as bortezomib (NFkB inhibitor), lenalidamide (anti‐angiogenesis) and Ibruitinib (Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase [BTK] inhibitor) have demonstrated excellent clinical activity in MCL patients. Autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation can also be considered in young patients. Clinical trials with novel agents are always a consideration for MCL patients. Am. J. Hematol. 90:740–745, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.