Prospective randomized comparison of wavefront-guided and conventional photorefractive keratectomy for myopia with the meditec MEL 70 laser

PURPOSE: To study refractive results and aberrometric changes in myopic patients treated with wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in comparison with standard PRK. METHODS: Sixty eyes of 60 patients with myopic astigmatism were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 included 30 eyes (mean spherical equivalent refraction -4.39 +/- 1.31 D; range -2.50 to -6.50 D) treated with wavefront-guided PRK using the WASCA workstation and the Asclepion Meditec flying spot MEL 70 excimer laser. Group 2 had 30 eyes (mean spherical equivalent refraction -4.33 +/- 1.22 D; range -2.50 to -6.50 D) that underwent conventional PRK using the same laser, and served as the control group. Wavefront analysis of high order aberrations was performed before and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Postoperatively, wavefront error increased in both groups (5.0-mm wavefront aperture diameter). Six months after surgery, the eyes that received the WASCA ablation had a smaller increase in root-mean-square (RMS; 70% of increment) compared to the conventional PRK group (139% of increment) (P<.001). In the standard PRK group, all aberrations notably increased; in the wavefront-guided PRK group there was a smaller increase of trefoil and spherical aberrations (P<.001) and a decrease of coma aberrations (P<.001). The smaller increase of wavefront error in the wavefront-guided PRK group compared to the standard PRK group was more evident when preoperative RMS values were higher than 0.4 microm (P<.01). The visual parameters (spherical equivalent refraction, uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity) did not show significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Wavefront-guided PRK induced a smaller increase of postoperative wavefront-error compared to conventional PRK, particularly in patients with higher preoperative higher order aberrations.     

Wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of wavefront-supported customized ablation (WASCA) in eyes treated with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) to correct spherical myopia and myopic astigmatism. METHODS: One-hundred fifty eyes of 104 patients (mean age 33.4 +/- 4.4 years) were included in the study. An Asclepion Shack-Hartmann wavefront aberrometer was used to assess lower and higher order refractive aberrations of eyes, and customized PRK treatments were carried out using the Asclepion-Meditec MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser. Follow-up time was 6 months. RESULTS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -4.02 +/- -1.04 D, and mean uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.06 +/- 0.02. Postoperatively, mean UCVA was 1.04 (better than 20/20), mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 1.22 (20/16), and average spherical equivalent refraction was -0.12 D; 98.6% (148 of 150 eyes) were within +/-0.50 D of intended refraction, and 100% were within +/-1.00 D. Concerning safety, in 71.1% of eyes (107 of 150) BSCVA was the same as preoperatively, and in 8.2% (11 of 150) it increased by two or more Snellen lines. None of the eyes lost two or more lines of BSCVA. The root mean square value for higher order aberrations increased 1.4 times following PRK. CONCLUSIONS: WASCA-guided PRK was efficacious, safe and predictable; BSCVA may be improved by the WASCA method compared to results achievable with a traditional PRK technique, in spite of an increase in the root mean square value for higher-order aberrations.     

Wavefront customized ablations with the WASCA Asclepion workstation

PURPOSE: WASCA (Wavefront Aberration Supported Cornea Ablation) is a method for wavefront-guided ablation. This new method records all existing eye aberrations with the Asclepion Wavefront Aberrometer and calculates the customized pattern for laser correction. We measured the low and high order aberrations of eyes before and after PRK and LASIK, as well as before and after flap creation. METHODS: The Asclepion Shack-Hartmann aberrometer was used to measure wavefront aberrations. Preoperative and postoperative measurements were made following both PRK and LASIK performed with conventional software, modified Aberration-free Profile (AFA) software, and specially designed WASCA software. Surgery was performed with the Meditec MEL-70 G-scan excimer laser. Additionally, measurements were made before and after flap creation only (10 eyes). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between preoperative and 1-month postoperative high order aberrations, with notable increases following conventional PRK and LASIK and less increase following modified AFA PRK and LASIK. Flap creation only changed the higher order aberrations slightly, and caused a shift toward hyperopia. In the eyes that received WASCA correction with PRK or LASIK, at 3 months postoperative the high order aberrations averaged an increase of 1.3 times for PRK and 1.8 times for LASIK. Both the AFA and WASCA treatments demonstrated improved outcomes in comparison to conventional PRK and LASIK. CONCLUSION: Wavefront mapping of the eye and wavefront-guided ablation with the Asclepion Aberrometer can be used for optimizing the results and fine-tuning visual performance after laser vision correction. WASCA PRK appeared to result in better outcomes than WASCA LASIK.     

Zyoptix wavefront-guided versus standard photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in low and moderate myopia: randomized controlled 6-month study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive and aberrometric outcome of wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) compared to standard PRK in myopic patients. METHODS: Fifty-six eyes of 56 patients were included in the study and were randomly divided into two groups. The study group consisted of 28 eyes with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -2.25+/-0.76 diopters (D) (range: -1.5 to -3.5 D) treated with wavefront-guided PRK using the Zywave ablation profile and the Bausch & Lomb Technolas 217z excimer laser (Zyoptix system) and the control group included 28 eyes with a SE of -2.35+/-1.01 D (range: -1.5 to -3.5 D) treated with standard PRK (PlanoScan ablation) using the same laser. A Zywave aberrometer was used to analyze and calculate the root-mean-square (RMS) of total high order aberrations (HOA) and Zernike coefficients of third and fourth order before and after (over a 6-month follow-up period) surgery in both groups. Preoperative and postoperative SE, un-corrected visual acuity (UCVA), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were evaluated in all cases. RESULTS: There was a high correlation between achieved and intended correction. The differences between the two treatment groups were not statistically significant for UCVA, BCVA, or SE cycloplegic refraction . Postoperatively the RMS value of high order aberrations was raised in both groups. At 6-month control, on average it increased by a factor of 1.17 in the Zyoptix PRK group and 1.54 in the PlanoScan PRK group (p=0.22). In the Zyoptix group there was a decrease of coma aberration, while in the PlanoScan group this third order aberration increased. The difference between postoperative and preoperative values between the two groups was statistically significant for coma aberration (p=0.013). No statistically significant difference was observed for spherical-like aberration between the two groups. In the study group eyes with a low amount of preoperative aberrations (HOA RMS lower than the median value; <0.28 microm) showed an increase of HOA RMS while eyes with RMS higher than 0.28 microm showed a decrease (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Zyoptix wavefront-guided PRK is as safe and efficacious for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism as PlanoScan PRK. Moreover this technique induces a smaller increase of third order coma aberration compared to standard PRK. The use of Zyoptix wavefront-guided PRK is particularly indicated in eyes with higher preoperative RMS values.     

Wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the ALLEGRETTO WAVE: three-month results of a prospective FDA trial

PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes using the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO WAVE to administer either wavefront-optimized (standard LASIK) or wavefront-guided (custom LASIK) treatments in myopic eyes. METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, multicenter study conducted in the United States, 374 eyes were randomized by alternating enrollment to receive either wavefront-optimized or wavefront-guided LASIK treatments with this laser platform. Bilateral treatments were administered, with both eyes of each patient receiving the same treatment. Corneal flaps were created using the IntraLase femtosecond laser. RESULTS: In this FDA clinical trial, results at 3 months postoperatively revealed that 93% of eyes in both cohorts receiving either wavefront-optimized or wavefront-guided treatments attained an uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better. Seventy-six percent of eyes with the wavefront-optimized treatment and 64% of eyes with the wavefront-guided treatment achieved UCVA of 20/16 or better. None of the eyes that received either treatment lost two lines or more of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA). In addition, 58% of eyes with wavefront-optimized treatment and 62% of eyes with wavefront-guided treatment gained one line or more of BSCVA. None of the eyes in either treatment group underwent retreatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of eyes, no statistically significant differences were found between either treatment group in regard to visual acuity and refractive outcomes. Wavefront-guided treatments are not required in most cases with this laser, but may be considered if the magnitude of preoperative root-mean-square (RMS) higher order aberrations is >0.35 microm. In this study population, 83% of eyes had preoperative RMS higher order aberrations of <0.3 microm.     

Conventional vs wavefront-guided LASIK using the LADARVision4000 excimer laser

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes after LASIK surgery using the conventional LADARVision4000 laser and the wavefront-guided LADARWave CustomCornea wavefront system. METHODS: A prospective study was performed involving 140 myopic eyes receiving conventional or CustomCornea LASIK between May and October 2003. The preoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction was limited to myopia < or = -7.00 diopters (D). The preoperative manifest cylinder was limited to < or = -2.50 D of astigmatism. Patients were evaluated for 3 months following surgery. Results evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, dilated wavefront measurements, contrast sensitivity, and patient responses to subjective questionnaires. RESULTS: For the CustomCornea eyes at 3 months, 80% (70/87) had UCVA > or = 20/20 and 95% (83/87) had UCVA > or = 20/25. For the conventional eyes at 3 months, 45% (9/20) had UCVA > or = 20/20 and 80% (16/20) had UCVA > or = 20/25. At the 3-month postoperative visit, 85% (74/87) of the CustomCornea eyes and 55% (11/20) of the conventional eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of their intended correction. At 1 and 3 months, the CustomCornea treated eyes had a statistically significant lower mean increase in higher order aberrations than conventionally treated eyes (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: CustomCornea wavefront-guided LASIK surgery appears safe and effective and provides clinical benefits that appear to exceed those of conventional LADARVision surgery.     

Photorefractive keratectomy for residual myopia after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correcting residual myopia and myopic astigmatism after cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. SETTING: Refractive Surgery and Cornea Unit, Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. METHODS: Thirty consecutive eyes (30 patients) had PRK for residual myopia after cataract surgery. Surface PRK with a VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser was used in all patients. Follow-up was 1 year. RESULTS: Before PRK, no eye had an uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better. Twelve months after PRK, 16 eyes (53.33%) had a UCVA of 20/40 or better. After PRK, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved 1 line or more in 14 eyes (46.66%) over the preoperative values, and 15 eyes (50.00%) had the same BCVA as before PRK. Mean pre-PRK refraction of -5.00 diopters (D) +/- 2.50 (SD) decreased significantly to -0.25 +/- 0.50 D at 12 months (P < .001). At 12 months, the spherical equivalent was within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia in 27 eyes (90.00%). No vision-threatening complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Photorefractive keratectomy was an effective, predictable, and safe procedure for correcting residual myopia and myopic astigmatism after cataract surgery.     

Photorefractive keratectomy with aspheric profile of ablation versus conventional photorefractive keratectomy for myopia correction: six-month controlled clinical trial

PURPOSE: To analyze ocular wavefront error and corneal asphericity (Q) in patients treated with aspheric profile photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) compared with patients having conventional PRK to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism and to evaluate the effect of postoperative corneal shape on visual performance. SETTING: Eye Clinic, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy. METHODS: Fifty eyes were treated with aspheric profile PRK using the MEL 80 flying-spot excimer laser, and 24 eyes were treated with standard PRK using the MEL 70 flying-spot excimer laser. RESULTS: Postoperative wavefront error increased in both groups. Six months after surgery, there was a smaller increase in root mean square (RMS) of total higher-order aberrations and spherical aberration (59% and 106%, respectively) in the aspheric profile PRK group than in the conventional PRK group (94% and 136%, respectively) (P<.01).The aspheric profile PRK group showed more prolate corneal asphericities (mean Q of 0.15 +/- 0.26) than the conventional group (mean Q of 0.45 +/- 0.26) (P<.001), with increasing oblateness for higher attempted corrections. A higher percentage of patients with better low-contrast uncorrected visual acuity and best corrected visual acuity was observed in the aspheric PRK group than in the conventional PRK group (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Aspheric profile and conventional PRK were safe and efficient for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Moreover, aspheric profile PRK induced a smaller increment of total wavefront error, was related to a smaller increase in spherical aberration, and better maintained the physiology of the corneal surface than conventional treatment.     

First results with wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia

PURPOSE: To compare the results of traditional laser photoablation and wavefront-supported customized ablation (WASCA) in hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (H-PRK). METHODS: This was a prospective study, comparing two treatment groups, each comprising 40 eyes of 20 patients. Wavefront aberrations were examined using a Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Preoperative refraction was similar in the two groups; in the traditional H-PRK group (Group 1) it was +3.10 +/- 0.85 D, and in the WASCA-guided group (Group 2) it was +2.90 +/- 0.80 D. H-PRK was performed with the Asclepion-Meditec MEL 70 flying-spot excimer laser. The follow-up time was 6 months. RESULTS: In Group 1, mean postoperative refraction was +0.14 +/- 0.24 D, and in Group 2, -0.10 +/- 0.25 D; mean uncorrected visual acuity was 0.92 +/- 0.16 in Group 1 and 0.95 +/- 0.18 in Group 2. Mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 0.96 +/- 0.04 in Group 1 and 1.06 +/- 0.13 in Group 2. In Group 1, 67.5% (27 of 40 eyes), and in Group 2, 85% (34 of 40 eyes) were within +/-0.50 D of target refraction. Regarding change of spectacle-corrected visual acuity in Group 1, 5% (2 of 40 eyes), and in Group 2, 20% (8 of 40 eyes) gained one Snellen line compared to the preoperative; in Group 1, 10% (4 of 40 eyes), and in Group 2, 12.5% (5 of 40 eyes) lost two Snellen lines. In Group 2, the root mean square value for the higher order aberration increased from the initial 0.134 to 0.257 microm at 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: WASCA-guided hyperopic-PRK treatment was found to be safe and predictable. The results were better than those achieved with traditional PRK performed using the same flying-spot type excimer laser.     

Photorefractive keratectomy for myopia with the Meditec MEL 70G-Scan flying spot laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, stability, and safety of the Meditec MEL 70G-Scan flying spot excimer laser. METHODS: One hundred thirty myopic eyes were treated with the Aesculap Meditec Mel 70G-Scan ArF flying spot excimer laser with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Patient groups: low myopia (Group 1) from -1.50 to -6.00 D (90 eyes), medium myopia (Group 2) from -6.10 to -9.00 D (31 eyes), high myopia (Group 3) from -9.10 to -14.00 D (9 eyes). RESULTS: At 12 months in the low myopia group, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better was achieved in 95.5% (86 eyes), 20/20 or better in 77.7% (70 eyes); 2.2% (two eyes) lost two or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA); 73.3% (66 eyes) were within +/-0.50 D of the target correction and 98.8% (89 eyes) were within +/-1.00 D. In the medium myopia group, UCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 74.2% (23 eyes), 20/20 or better in 25.8% (eight eyes); 3.2% (one eye) lost two lines, 61% (19 eyes) were within +/-0.50 D of desired correction and 83.8% (26 eyes) were within +/-1.00 D. In the high myopia group, UCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 22.2% (two eyes); 20/25 or better in 11.1% (one eye); none of the eyes achieved 20/20 UCVA; 22.2% (two eyes) lost two lines of BSCVA; 44.4% (four eyes) were within +/-0.50 D and 66.6% (six eyes) were within +/-1.00 D of the target correction. Refractive stability was achieved between 3 and 6 months. Increased intraocular pressure was detected overall in 7.69%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of predictability, safety, and efficacy in low and medium myopia with the Meditec MEL 70G-Scan flying spot excimer laser were good, but poorer predictability, regression, and a significant loss of BSCVA were observed in the high myopia group.     

Photorefractive keratectomy for astigmatism with the Meditec MEL 60 laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in eyes treated with astigmatic refractive errors. METHODS: Nine hundred forty eyes were treated with the Aesculap Meditec MEL 60 ArF excimer laser. Treatment groups were: Group 1 (n=746) eyes with compound myopic astigmatism, Group 2 (n=104) eyes with compound hyperopic astigmatism, Group 3 (n=75) eyes treated for mixed astigmatism, and Group 4 (n=15) eyes with simple myopic astigmatism (negative cylinder). RESULTS: In Group 1, the preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of -6.10 D with an average of -1.50 D cylinder decreased to -0.95 D with -0.13 D cylinder; uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better was achieved in 86% (642/746 eyes); 20/20 or better in 58% (433/746 eyes); 0.8% (6/746 eyes) lost two lines of spectacle-corrected visual acuity (SCVA); 74% (552/746 eyes) were within +/-0.50 D and 93% (694/746 eyes) were within +/-1.00 D of target refraction. In Group 2, preoperative mean +4.57 D spherical equivalent refraction with an average of +1.57 D cylinder decreased to +1.13 D with +0.38 D cylinder; UCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 84% (87/104 eyes); 20/20 or better in 46% (48/104 eyes); 14,4% (15/104 eyes) lost two or more lines of SCVA; 52% (54/104 eyes) were within +/-0.50 D and 82% (85/104 eyes) were within +/-1.00 D of target refraction. In Group 3, mean preoperative -4.20 D cylinder and +3.00 D spherical equivalent refraction decreased to -0.50 D cylinder and -0.50 D spherical equivalent refraction; UCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 83% (62/75 eyes); 20/20 or better in 32% (24/75 eyes); 13.3% (10/75 eyes) lost two or more lines of SCVA. In Group 4, mean preoperative -3.98 D cylinder decreased to -0.62 D cylinder; UCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 60% (9/15 eyes); none of the eyes achieved 20/20 or better; SCVA remained stable in 6.6% (1/15 eyes) and decreased two or more lines in 20.0% (3/15 eyes); 20% (3/15 eyes) were within +/-0.50 D and 53.3% (8/15 eyes) were within +/-1.00 D of target refraction. CONCLUSION: PRK with the Meditec MEL 60 laser produced the best results in eyes with compound myopic astigmatism (Group 1). In all other groups, results were less predictable.     

波前像差引导与角膜地形图引导的LASIK术后视觉质量的比较

目的 比较波前像差引导的个性化飞秒激光辅助的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(FS-LASIK)与角膜地形图引导的个性化FS-LASIK矫正近视术后的视觉质量.设计回顾性比较性病例系列.研究对象北京同仁医院连续接受FS-LASIK的近视眼患者130例(130眼).方法 波前像差引导的FS-LASIK的近视眼患者68例(68眼)...     

Predictability and outcomes of photoastigmatic keratectomy using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of astigmatic correction on the accuracy of the myopic and astigmatic correction in patients having photorefractive astigmatic keratectomy (PARK) and in those having photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Specialist excimer laser refractive clinic. METHODS: This prospective consecutive case series comprised 6097 eyes with a preoperative mean spherical equivalent (MSE) of -4.63 diopters (D) +/- 1.95 (SD) (range -0.75 to -13.00 D) and a mean cylinder of -1.13 +/- 0.73 D (range -0.50 to -6.00 D) having PARK with a Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Visual and refractive outcomes were assessed 12 months postoperatively and compared with those in 3004 eyes that had spherical PRK. RESULTS: At 12 months, the MSE was -0.02 +/- 0.79 D and the mean cylinder was -0.49 +/- 0.47 D in the PARK group; the MSE was -0.07 +/- 0.66 D in the PRK group. An MSE within +/-0.05 D of emmetropia was achieved by 69.8% and within +/-1.00 D, by 87.9%. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/20 or better in 42.6% and 20/40 or better in 91.2%. Statistical significance (P <.001, analysis of variance) was achieved for MSE, sphere, cylinder, haze, and visual acuity (best corrected [BCVA] and UCVA) based on the preoperative cylinder. The loss of BCVA varied from 1.1% to 5.8% depending on the degree of astigmatism treated. Accuracy varied with the attempted myopic correction and the attempted astigmatic correction. CONCLUSIONS: Excimer laser PARK was an effective treatment for compound myopic astigmatism, but predictability decreased and complications increased as the attempted astigmatic correction increased.     

Prospective study of photorefractive keratectomy for myopia using the VISX StarS2 excimer laser system

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and predictability of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for compound myopic astigmatism using the VISX StarS2 excimer laser system with international version 3.1 software. METHODS: We report a prospective consecutive study of myopic excimer laser PRK, performed in a multi-surgeon environment with 200 eyes of 117 patients, to correct naturally occurring compound myopic astigmatism of between -0.50 to -5.90 D manifest refractive sphere and up to -3.50 D manifest refractive astigmatism. Patients were assessed prior to surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-eight of 200 treatments (99%) were reviewed 1 year after surgery; 193 of 198 eyes (97%) achieved 20/40 or better uncorrected visual acuity and 163 of 198 eyes (82%) achieved 20/20 or better. One eye lost two lines of Snellen visual acuity assessed at 12 months but recovered acuity when assessed at 18 months. Mean spherical equivalent corneal plane power was reduced from -3.50 to +0.90 D 1 month after treatment and 0 D at 12 months (SD 0.67 D). Three eyes of three patients underwent further treatment, two with LASIK and one with PRK for residual refractive error. Refractive astigmatism of >1.00 D was reduced from a mean -1.70 to -0.70 D at 1 year after treatment. Vector magnitude was 79% of that intended and mean vector axis error (absolute) was 8.5 degrees. No eye had a severe haze response. Pelli-Robson contrast acuity was significantly reduced after treatment from a mean 1.72 D preoperatively to 1.63 D at 12 months (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: PRK for myopia using the VISX StarS2 excimer laser system was effective in the treatment of low myopic astigmatism, although there was a significant reduction in Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity.     

Enhancement outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis using topographically guided excimer laser photoablation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topographically guided excimer laser photoablation to retreat unsuccessful myopic and hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Eye Clinic, San Salvatore Hospital, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy. METHODS: At least 3 months after primary PRK (Group A) or primary LASIK (Group B), 48 eyes of 42 patients were submitted to PRK or LASIK enhancements. The eyes were treated with an excimer laser linked to a computerized videokeratography unit with a topographically supported customized ablation workstation. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 27.8 months +/- 8.2 (SD). In Group A, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) changed from 0.5 +/- 0.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (range 20/600 to 20/200) to 0.1 +/- 0.7 logMAR (range 20/60 to 20/20); the mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) changed from 0.1 +/- 0.7 logMAR (range 20/50 to 20/20) to 0 +/- 0.7 logMAR (range 20/50 to 20/20) after the enhancement. In Group B, the UCVA changed from 0.7 +/- 0.8 logMAR (range 20/600 to 20/40) to 0.1 +/- 0.7 logMAR (range 20/40 to 20/20); the mean BSCVA improved from 0.2 +/- 0.8 logMAR (range 20/30 to 20/20) to 0 +/- 1.3 logMAR (range 20/25 to 20/20) after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The enhancements using topographically guided excimer laser photoablation with a topographically supported customized ablation method resulted in satisfactory and stable visual outcome with good safety and efficacy after unsuccessful PRK and LASIK.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of hyperopia. Results of a 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low to moderate hyperopia with a 2-year follow-up. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: This prospective comparative single-surgeon study included 216 eyes of 108 patients with hyperopia who received PRK in 1 eye and LASEK in the contralateral eye. The mean patient age was 38.3 years (range 25 to 58 years). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) cycloplegic refraction was +3.67 diopters (D) +/- 1.15 (SD) (range +2.00 to +5.00 D), and astigmatism was less than 1.00 D. In each patient, PRK was performed in 1 eye (Group A) and LASEK was performed in the other eye (Group B) using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, manifest and cycloplegic refractions, refractive stability and predictability, postoperative pain, and corneal haze were examined and statistically analyzed. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: At 1 week, the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 58% of PRK eyes and 85% of LASEK eyes (P =.037); at 2 years, it was 20/40 or better in 81% and 91%, respectively (P =.076). At 2 years, the UCVA for near was N8 or better in 73% of PRK eyes and 89% of LASEK eyes (P =.064). No patient lost 2 or more lines of Snellen visual acuity. The safety index was 1.03 in PRK eyes and 1.08 in LASEK eyes. Refractive stability was achieved at 6 months in LASEK eyes and at 12 months in PRK eyes. The mean SE cycloplegic refraction decreased from +3.58 D (PRK eyes) and +3.76 D (LASEK eyes) at baseline to +0.74 D and +0.32 D, respectively, at 2 years; in 57% and 78% of eyes, respectively, the refraction was within +/-0.50 D of the targeted refraction. Peripheral corneal haze scores at 3 to 9 months and pain scores at 1 to 3 days were significantly lower in the LASEK group than in the PRK group. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for hyperopia up to +5.00 D provided good visual and refractive results. It significantly reduced postoperative pain, grade of peripheral ring-shaped corneal haze, and regression of hyperopia. Hyperopic LASEK provided quicker visual recovery and achieved better efficacy, predictability, and refractive stability than hyperopic PRK.     

Topical thiotepa treatment for recurrent corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To describe the use of topical thiotepa in the treatment of recurrent haze after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: Gimbel Eye Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. METHODS: Five patients with recurrent haze after myopic PRK were retreated with phototherapeutic keratectomy and topical thiotepa. Before retreatment, the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 20/40 to 20/200. Follow-up ranged from 3 to to15 months. RESULTS:Haze, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and BCVA improved in all patients. Three eyes had a UCVA of 20/20(-2) or better and a BCVA of 20/20(-1) or better. The other 2 eyes experienced regression of the myopia and astigmatism and had a BCVA of 20/25(-1) or better. CONCLUSION: Topical thiotepa appeared to be an effective treatment for recurrent corneal haze following myopic PRK.     

First clinical experience with the Alcon LADAR 6000 excimer laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability and ergonomics and to assess the first clinical results provided by the new LADAR 6000 excimer laser used to correct myopia and astigmatism, both by conventional and wavefront-guided ablation. METHODS: Seventy-four consecutive eyes from 37 patients underwent LASIK as the first field evaluation protocol of the Alcon LADAR 6000 excimer laser. Forty-six eyes were treated by wavefront-guided ablation to correct a manifest spheroequivalent refractive error (MSRE) of -0.50 to -9.75 diopters (D) (mean: -4.19 D, cylinder range: 0.0 to -3.50 D). Twenty-eight eyes were treated by conventional ablation to correct MSRE of -1.00 to -7.00 D (mean: -3.11 D, cylinder range: 0.0 to -1.75 D). Uncorrected (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), MSRE, and wavefront measurements were assessed. Follow-up was 3 months for all eyes. RESULTS: Three months after surgery, all eyes were within +/- 1.00 D of intended correction. Forty-three (93.5%) eyes treated with wavefront-guided ablation and 25 (89.3%) eyes treated with conventional ablation were within +/- 0.50 D. All eyes reached > or = 20/25 UCVA. UCVA > or = 20/20 was reached in 45 (97.8%) wavefront-guided eyes and 26 (92.9%) conventional eyes; 37 (80.4%) wavefront-guided eyes and 17 (60.7%) conventional eyes had 20/16 UCVA. None of the eyes treated lost > or = 2 lines of BSCVA. CONCLUSIONS: The LADAR 6000 excimer laser results proved to be at least as accurate, predictable, and safe as the results currently achieved with the LADARVision4000 excimer laser. The improved microscope illumination enhances visibility for better consistency and ease of use. The better ergonomics and software design of this platform improved patient flow.     

Photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia in 800 eyes with the Meditec MEL 60 laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive results of 800 hyperopic eyes undergoing PRK treatment. METHODS: Eight hundred hyperopic eyes were treated with PRK. An Aesculap-Meditec MEL 60 scanning ArF excimer laser used. Treatment Group 1 consisted of eyes with a preoperative refractive error of +3.50 D or less (n = 482) and Group 2, of +3.75 D or more (n = 318). RESULTS: Preoperatively, Group 1 required an average correction of +2.88+/-1.34 D and Group 2 required +5.64+/-2.96 D. One year after PRK, average residual correction was +1.26+/-1.24 D in Group 1, and in Group 2, +2.46+/-1.84 D. In Group 1, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/40 or better in 88.4% (426/482); 20/20 or better in 75.7% (365); 2.1% (10/482) of eyes lost 2 lines, 2.1% (10/482) gained 2 lines; 3.1% (15/482) gained 2 or more lines of BSCVA; 74.4% (359/482) of eyes were within +/-0.50 D of target correction and 84.8% (408/482) were within +/-1.00 D. In Group 2, 47.5% (151/318) had UCVA of 20/40 or better; 34.2% (109/318) saw 20/20 or better uncorrected; 19.1% (61/318) lost 2 lines; 11.6% (37/318) lost 3 lines; none of the eyes gained 2 or more lines of BSCVA; 22.3% (71/318) were within +/-0.50 D and 46.8% (149/318) were within +/-1.00 D of target correction. Refractive stability was achieved after 6 months; a slight regression after 6 months was still observed. In Group 1, 10.5% (42/482) and in Group 2, 21.6% (69/318) complained of problems with daytime vision (glare and ghost image); during night-driving in Group 1, 17.6% (85/482) and in Group 2, 40.5% (129/318) had problems. CONCLUSION: PRK with the Aesculap-Meditec MEL 60 scanning ArF excimer laser offered the best long-term results with +3.50 D or less preoperative refractive error. With higher corrections, regression, decrease in BSCVA, and daytime visual problems were encountered.     

One-year results of PRK in low and moderate myopia: fewer than 0.5% of eyes lose two or more lines of vision

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the results of myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for different levels of intended correction, including analysis of loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. METHODS: Four hundred seventy-five consecutive eyes with 1 year of follow-up that had PRK for the correction of 1-7 diopters (D) of myopia by using the Summit SVS Apex excimer laser. Three hundred forty-eight eyes were examined at 1 year. This study was confined to the 236 eyes with 1 year of follow-up that had PRK without astigmatic keratotomy. Eyes also were analyzed according to the range of attempted correction (0-3 D, low; 3.1-6D, moderate; and > or =6.1 D, high moderate). Manifest refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), surface regularity index (SRI), and surface asymmetry index (SAI) were evaluated for each group. RESULTS: One year after PRK, 91% of all eyes were within 1 diopter and 73% of eyes were within 0.5 diopter of emmetropia. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/25 or better in 79% and 20/40 or better in 96% of eyes. Two lines of BSCVA were lost in only 0.4% of eyes (one of 236). No eye lost >2 lines of BSCVA, and 30% gained one line. Mean SRI and SAI were increased as compared with preoperative values, but were within the normal range for our patient population (ranges, 0.2-1.0 and 0.1-0.7, respectively). UCVA, BSCVA, and predictability decreased, whereas SAI and SRI increased, with increasing attempted correction. CONCLUSION: PRK effectively reduced myopia in all eyes with 12 months' follow-up. Predictability tended to decrease with increasing attempted correction, even for low to moderate myopia. PRK may induce mild surface asymmetry and irregularity, and these alterations tend to increase with higher attempted correction. Fewer than 0.5% of eyes lost > or =2 lines of best-corrected visual acuity.