Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer

The clinical management of breast cancer has improved tremendously in the last 2 decades. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) allows conservation of the axillary lymph nodes in most patients who have breast cancer. Furthermore, it allows identification of occult nodal disease after step sectioning and more detailed staging. Although large breast tumors, multicentric disease, recurrent cancers, and use of neoadjuvant therapy were previously considered contraindications to SNB, a large body of evidence is accumulating to support its use in these cases. The prognostic significance of micrometastases and isolated tumor cells needs clarification in prospective, randomized trials.     

染料法乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的临床应用

为了探讨影响染料法乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检（SLNB）成功率的因素及其可能机制,使用亚甲蓝染色法对89例乳腺癌进行SLNB,分析其可能的影响因素和机制.结果：78例成功检出前哨淋巴结（SLN）,检出率为87.6%.术前未触及肿大淋巴结者,SLN检出率明显高于可触及肿大淋巴结者（P＜0.05）,而假阴性率显著低于后者,P＜0.05;实验后期64例SLNB检出率高于实验早期25例的检出率,P＜0.05.初步研究结果提示,腋窝淋巴结肿大影响SLNB的检出率;SLNB技术学习曲线也可影响SLN的检出率.SLNB可用于指导乳腺癌的外科治疗.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with multifocal breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Multifocal or multicentric breast cancer has been suggested as a contraindication for sentinel node biopsy (SNB). However, recent studies have demonstrated that all quadrants of the breast drain through common afferent channels to a common axillary sentinel node. This should mean that the presence of multifocal tumour should not affect the lymphatic drainage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of SNB in patients with multifocal breast cancer using a peritumoural injection technique for sentinel lymph node (SN) mapping. METHODS: In the ALMANAC multicentre trial validation phase, we took SNB samples from 842 patients with node negative, invasive breast cancer with use of a blue dye and radiolabelled colloid mapping technique at the peritumoural injection site. All patients underwent standard axillary treatment after SNB. Seventy-five of the 842 patients had multifocal lesions on final histopathologic examination. The following analysis is focused on patients with multifocal lesions. RESULTS: A mean number of 2.4 SNs were identified in 71 of 75 patients (identification rate: 94.7%). Thirty-one patients had a positive SN, 40 a negative SN. Standard axillary treatment confirmed the SN to be negative in 37 of 40 patients, whereas three patients revealed positive non-sentinel lymph nodes (false-negative rate: 8.8%). Overall SN biopsy accurately predicted axillary lymph node status in 68 of 71 patients (95.8%). CONCLUSION: SNB accurately staged the axilla in multifocal breast cancer and may become an alternative to complete axillary lymph node dissection in node negative patients with multifocal breast cancer.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in male patients with early breast cancer

Mastectomy with axillary dissection is still the most commonly recommended procedure for male breast cancer. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate our experience in 32 male patients with early breast cancer who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary dissection only in cases of metastases in the sentinel lymph node (SLN). The median age was 58 years (range, 33-80). Lymphoscintigraphy was successful in all patients, with a mean number of visualized SLNs per patient of 1.3 (range, 1-2). At surgery, the identification rate of the SLN was 100%, with a mean number of removed SLNs per patient of 1.5 (range, 1-3). Twenty-six patients had negative SLNs, six patients had positive SLNs. Two patients with metastatic SLNs had additional positive nodes. After a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 1-63) no axillary reappearance of the disease occurred. As with women, we recommend SLNB in male patients with breast cancer and clinically negative axilla.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy using CT lymphography in breast cancer

Background  

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard surgical procedure for patients with early breast cancer. The combination of radioisotope (RI) and dye staining is the most accurate method for identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). However, institutions without RI centers perform SLNB by blue dye alone. The identification rate with the dye method alone is inferior to the RI combination method. In our institution, the identification rate of SLNBs by the dye method alone was 95%. So we started this study of SLNB using computed tomographic lymphography (CTLG).     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in male breast cancer patients.

The concept of sentinel node biopsy has been validated for female breast cancer patients whereas, ALND remains the standard of care for male breast cancer patients with similar tumours. We evaluated the results of SLN biopsy in male breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillae. This study included all male breast cancer patients who underwent SLN biopsy between February 1998 and October 2003. All patients had negative axillae on clinical examination. All patients underwent pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy. SLN biopsy was performed using a combination of Patent blue V and 99mTc-radiolabelled colloidal albumin injected peritumourally. Nine patients, 26-79 years of age, were included in the study. Pre-operative lymphoscinitgraphy identified SLNs in all patients. Intraoperatively, SLNs were successfully localised in all patients. The mean number of SLNs encountered was 2.4. Five patients had a positive SLN, four a negative SLN. Five patients (one with a negative SLN, four with a positive SLN) had been elected pre-operatively to undergo ALND regardless of findings on SLN biopsy. ALND confirmed the SLN to be negative in one patient (false-negative rate: 0%) and three of the four patients with positive SLN(s) had additional positive nodes in the axilla. SLN biopsy accurately predicted axillary lymph node status in these five patients. These findings compare favourably with findings reported in the literature regarding SLN biopsy in female breast cancer patients. SLN biopsy accurately staged the axilla in male breast cancer patients and should be considered for axillary staging in male breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillae.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients with previous breast augmentation surgery

The number of breast augmentation surgeries (BAS) has increased. Therefore, the number of breast cancer patients with history of BAS has also increased. In this paper, we present two cases of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with previous BAS who were diagnosed with breast cancer. The patients were augmented using different approach; the first case was augmented through transaxillary incision, whereas the second case was augmented through periareolar incision. Lymphoscintigraphy (LPG) was performed on the patients 1 day prior to operation, enabling confirmation of lymphatic flow and SLN in both patients. SLNB was successfully performed in both cases. In one patient, SLNB was performed using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence and the Photodynamic Eye (PDE) system. Regardless of history of BAS, ICG and PDE system showed lymphatic flow and SLN in real time. LPG and ICG fluorescence were useful methods for SLN detection in patients with previous BAS, being able to confirm lymph flow before operation. Biopsy methods using LPG and PDE system were considered useful for difficult confirmation of lymph flow after breast augmentation. This is the first report of SLNB using ICG and PDE system for patients with previous BAS.     

前哨淋巴结活检术在乳腺癌手术中的应用

目的探讨乳腺癌手术治疗中前哨淋巴结活检术的应用价值。方法选取2013年2月至2016年12月间海南省中医院收治的80例接受乳腺癌手术治疗的患者,采用随机数表法分为观察组(接受前哨淋巴结活检术)与对照组(未接受前哨淋巴结活检术),每组40例。比较两组患者治疗前后血清肿瘤标志物水平和不良反应情况。结果治疗后观察组患者血清肿瘤标志物癌脴抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原(CA153)和糖类抗原(CA125)分别为(2.36±0.56)ng/ml、(13.21±5.53)U/ml和(15.64±5.43)U/ml,对照组患者分别为(3.28±0.86)ng/ml、(14.86±4.53)U/ml和(16.98±6.69)U/ml,两组均较治疗前明显降低,且观察组患者较对照组降低更多,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。对照组患者皮下积液、上肢水肿和上肢活动受限等并发症发生率合计为40.0%,观察组患者为7.5%,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论前哨淋巴结活检辅助乳腺癌手术能够避免不必要的淋巴结清扫,减少机体损伤,降低不良反应发生率,且不会对手术效果造成影响,可在临床中推广。     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

The concept of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in breast cancer patients is simple, attractive and rapidly emerging as a new standard of care. Several aspects of the technique of lymphatic mapping, case selection, pathologic analysis and the finding of micrometastases, and the accuracy of the technique are important subjects of study and debate in the literature and will be discussed in this review. High identification rates can be attained by the use of both radioguided and blue dye lymphatic mapping. Intradermal injection of tracers has reported to be successful, suggesting that dermal and parenchymal lymphatics drain to the same SLN. Extra axillary drainage is only seen after peri- or intratumoural injection. SLN biopsy is most widely used for both palpable and non-palpable T1 and T2 tumours, and limited experience exists for other indications. Accuracy is high only in experienced hands. The impact of failure of the procedure on regional disease control and survival will be assessed in a trial of the NSABP (National Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project). The influence of a positive SLN biopsy with and without axillary dissection on survival and local control will be studied in trials of the BASO (British Association of Surgical Oncology), ACOSOG (American College of Surgeons Oncology Group) and EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer). These phase III trials and related studies on the importance of micrometastases in the SLN will give new insights in the safety of the SLN procedure and in the importance of treatment of regional lymph nodes in relation to local disease control and survival.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND:

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a widely used staging method for patients with early breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy modifies the anatomical conditions in the breast and axilla, and thus SLNB remains controversial in patients treated preoperatively. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the reliability and accuracy of this procedure in this particular group of patients.

METHODS:

The retrospective study analyzed medical records of patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer between the years 2005 and 2009. Of the patients treated by neoadjuvant therapy, 343 underwent lymphatic mapping to identify sentinel lymph nodes, and these were included in the analysis.

RESULTS:

The overall detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes was 80.8%. It was strongly influenced by clinical lymph node status (significantly higher success rate in lymph node‐negative patients); higher detection rates were also associated with age <50 years, estrogen receptor positivity, lower proliferation index, and absent lymphovascular space invasion. The false‐negative rate was 19.5% and was only marginally significantly dependent on lymphovascular space invasion. The overall accuracy of the method was 91.5%.

CONCLUSIONS:

By using the present technique, sentinel lymph node biopsy cannot be recommended as a reliable predictor of axillary lymph node status when performed at the authors' institution after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Infrequent use of blue dye for lymphatic mapping, low number of resected sentinel lymph nodes, and absence of any selection among patients included in the study could be the main factors responsible for the low detection rate and high false‐negative rate. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检30例分析

目反同位素为示踪剂探测乳腺癌前哨淋巴结（ｓｅｎｔｉｎｅｌ ｌｙｍｐｈ ｎｏｄｅ,ＳＬＮ）,并根据前哨淋巴结活检和腋淋巴结清扫的病理结果,评价前哨淋巴结预测腋窝淋巴结转移的准确性。方法：研究对象为自２０００年５月份起我院乳腺科收治的３０例Ｔ１－２Ｎ０的乳腺癌患者,使用＾９９ｍＴｃ－硫胶体（＾９９ｍＴｃ－ｓｕｌｐｈｕｒ ｃｏｌｌｏｉｄ）为示踪剂,用Ｇａｍｍａ探测仪进行前哨淋巴结探测活检,之后行腋窝清扫。结果：２７例患者中成功地发现了ＳＬＮ,发现率为９０％（２７／３０）,前哨淋巴结的数量为１－３个,平均每例１．５个,非前哨淋巴结（ｎｏｎｓｅｎｔｉｎｅｌ ｎｏｄｅ）５－２０个,平均数１３．３个,２７例ＳＮＢ成功的患者中１４（５２％）例有腋窝淋巴结转移,前哨淋巴结未发现转移而非前哨淋巴结有转移的有２例,假阴性率７．４％（     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an accurate method for axillary staging in patients with early breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and the feasibility of SLNB in breast cancer patients who had received preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with advanced breast cancer stage II or III who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in the study. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and biopsy was attempted and performed, and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed in the same surgical procedure after SLNB. The histopathologic examination of the SLNs and the dissected axillary lymph nodes was performed and nodal status was compared. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in the study. After peritumoural injection of technetium-99m labelled human albumin and subareolar subcutaneous injection of blue dye, the SLNs could be identified in 26/30 patients (identification rate 86.7%). In 4/30 patients (13.3%) SLNs could not be identified. In 25/26 patients (96.2%) SLNs accurately predicted the axillary status. Eleven patients had negative SLNs and negative nodes in ALND. Six patients had positive SLNs and positive nodes in ALND. In eight patients SLNs only were positive and nodes in ALND were negative. One patient had a false-negative SLNB, calculating a false-negative rate of 6.7% (1/15). CONCLUSIONS: SLNB is a well introduced technique for axillary staging in patients with early breast cancer. The accuracy of SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is similar to patients with primary surgery. SLNB could be an alternative to ALND in a subgroup of patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and therefore could reduce morbidity due to surgery in those patients. Due to small numbers of patients, further evaluation in this subset of patients is required.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with male breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is now a widely implemented technique for evaluating the axilla in women with early stage breast carcinoma. Men who develop breast carcinoma are at similar risk as their female counterparts of developing the morbidities related to axillary dissection. SLNB is aimed at preventing these morbidities. In this study, the authors evaluated the role of SLNB in the treatment of men with early stage breast carcinoma. METHODS: Among the 1692 patients who underwent SLNB at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 16 men with breast carcinoma were identified. The charts and records of these 16 patients were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 57.2 years. The mean tumor size was 1.3 cm. In 15 of 16 patients (93.75%) and in all patients with T1 tumors, one or more sentinel lymph nodes were successfully identified. SLNB failed in one patient, who had a T2 tumor (3 cm). Ten of the 15 patients had negative sentinel lymph nodes (66.7%). Four of these patients had no additional lymph nodes removed, whereas six patients had additional lymph nodes removed, all of which were negative. Two patients (13.3%) had positive sentinel lymph nodes on frozen-section analysis and underwent immediate completion axillary dissection: Both had additional positive lymph nodes. Three patients (20.0%) had positive sentinel lymph nodes on further sectioning or immunohistochemistry, and two patients underwent completion axillary dissection: Neither patient had additional positive lymph nodes. The third patient had one immunohistochemically positive lymph node and did not undergo completion axillary dissection. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB for patients with breast carcinoma was as successful in men as it has been shown to be in women and may be offered as a management option to men with early stage breast carcinoma by surgeons who are experienced with the technique.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy compared with axillary lymph node dissection in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been recommended as the standard performance for negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) patients without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in the surgical management of early breast cancer; however, the efficiency of SLNB for patients with positive SLNs is still unclear. We performed this meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness and safety of SLNB with ALND. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SLNB with ALND in early breast cancer were identified in Pubmed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), regional lymph node recurrence, postoperative morbidity, and quality of life (QOL) between the two groups were assessed by using the methods provided by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Eight well-designed RCTs (total 8,560 patients; 4,301 for SLNB and 4,259 for ALND) were included. Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in OS (HR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.90–1.27), DFS (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.88–1.14), and regional lymph node recurrence (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 0.77–3.56) between SLNB and ALND group, whether for SLN (+) subgroup or for SLN (−) subgroup. However, SLNB results in a significant reduction of postoperative morbidity and improved QOL. In conclusion, SLNB can be recommended as preferred care for SLN-negative patients and selected patients with SLN-micrometastasis. Despite this, ALND remains the standard management in breast cancer patients with SLN-macrometastasis.     

Sentinel node biopsy in patients with multiple breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Multicentric or multifocal breast cancer is considered a limitation for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Studies showing that all quadrants of the breast drain via common afferent lymphatic channels indicate that multiple tumors do not affect lymphatic drainage. We therefore assessed the accuracy of SLNB in patients with multiple breast tumors. METHODS: Of the 942 breast cancer patients who underwent SLNB using radioisotope at Asan Medical Center between January 2003 and December 2006, 803 had unifocal and 139 had multiple tumors. Axillary dissection after SLNB was performed on 884 patients, 757 with unifocal and 127 with multiple tumors. All patients underwent lymphatic scintigram for removal of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). The clinical characteristics and accuracy of SLNB was compared in patients with unifocal and multiple breast cancer. RESULTS: In the multiple tumor group, 2.68 +/- 0.84 SLNs were identified in 136 of 139 patients (identification rate, 97.84%); 81.5% of SLNs were identified by scintigram. The incidence of axillary metastases was 29.50% (41/139). SLNB accuracy was 97.63% (124/127), with a false negative (FN) rate of 7.89% (3/38). In the unifocal group, 2.67 +/- 0.96 SLNs were identified in 787 of 803 patients (identification rate, 98.00%); 84.8% of SLNs were identified by scintigram. The incidence of axillary metastasis was 22.04% (177/803). SLNB accuracy was 98.02% (742/757), with a FN rate of 8.62% (15/174). The accuracy and FN rate of SLNB did not differ significantly between unifocal and multiple breast cancer. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of SLNB in multiple breast cancer is comparable to its accuracy in unifocal cancer. These findings indicate that SLNB can be used an as alternative to complete axillary lymph node dissection in patients with multiple breast tumors.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in operations for recurrent breast cancer

Background

In a pilot prospective consecutive series on 50 patients with recurrent breast cancer, results of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are reported. The interval between primary operation and recurrence was 8 years (range 1–18 years). Only three patients had not undergone dissection of the axilla (ALND).

Results

In 51% of patients scintigraphy disclosed sentinel nodes (SN). At operation SN was identified in 45% of patients corresponding to 83% of the SN's visualized by the scintigraphy. SN contained metastases in seven cases (16%), and the treatment plan was changed as a consequence of the SN examination.

Conclusion

SLNB can identify SN at a high rate, and the findings may influence further planning of treatment. SLNB should be a future standard procedure in operations for recurrent breast cancer. Next step should be a randomized study.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of breast cancer

Sentinel node localization is the second most important development in this century after conservative lumpectomy for the treatment of early breast cancer. The sentinel node mapping is a new multidisciplinary approach for staging of axilla in an accurate and less morbid way as compared to axillary node dissection. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer has been adopted rapidly into clinical practice. The accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy is more than 95%, when performed meticulously (by an experienced multidisciplinary team) with proper patient selection. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is most widely used for both palpable and non-palpable T1 and T2 tumors. Recent studies show application of sentinel lymph node technique in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, sentinel lymph node biopsy technique has application in developing countries and other countries where screening for breast cancer is not common and most patients present relatively in advanced stage of the disease. Several aspects of the sentinel lymph node biopsy including technique, case selection, pathologic analysis and accuracy with supportive important studies published in the literature will be discussed in this review.     

Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer

The role of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer has increased over the last few years. Sentinel nodes can predict the status of all axillary lymph nodes precisely and select patients with negative nodes for whom axillary dissection is unnecessary. Many problems remain, such as the ideal injection technique, ideal agents, and ideal histological detection of sentinel node metastases, and must be addressed before sentinel node biopsy becomes the standard of care for patients with breast cancer.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy as an alternative to routine axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a useful way of assessing axillary nodal status and obviating axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with node-negative breast cancer. Because SLN technology is evolving rapidly, however, variation in technique is widespread, and no standardization has yet been accomplished. This review discusses the feasibility and accuracy of this procedure and suggests the optimal method for identifying the SLN and detecting micrometastases. Although the SLN can be successfully identified by either the dye-guided or gamma probe-guided method in experienced hands, identification is facilitated when the two techniques are used together. In the gamma probe-guided method, the use of a large-sized radiotracer (particle size, 200-1000 nm) may be preferred because only one or two SLNs are identified. To increase the chance of finding metastases in SLN, it is desirable to make step sections with hematoxylin and eosin staining on permanent and frozen sections. The addition of immunohistochemistry may improve the accuracy of SLN diagnosis. The intraoperative examination of imprint cytology may be useful in determining the status of the SLNs, but further studies are needed to establish whether it has additional value when combined with the frozen section. In practice, routine ALND can be avoided when there is documentation of extensive experience and a low false-negative rate with the technique in the hands of a particular surgeon and hospital team. Particularly, SLN biopsy is more successful and has a lower false-negative rate in patients with smaller tumors. However, investigation of long-term regional control and survival in a prospective randomized trial is necessary, before SLN biopsy can replace routine ALND as the preferred staging operation for women with breast cancer.