Continuous versus intermittent intravenous administration of antibiotics: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Intermittent intravenous administration of antibiotics is the first-line approach in the management of severe infections worldwide. However, the potential benefits of alternate modes of administration of antibiotics, including continuous intravenous infusion, deserve further evaluation. We did a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing continuous intravenous infusion with intermittent intravenous administration of the same antibiotic regimen. Nine randomised controlled trials studying beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and vancomycin were included. Clinical failure was lower, although without statistical significance, in patients receiving continuous infusion of antibiotics (pooled OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.01); the difference was statistically significant in a subset of randomised controlled trials that used the same total daily antibiotic dose for both intervention arms (0.70, 0.50-0.98, fixed and random effects models). Regarding mortality and nephrotoxicity, no differences were found (mortality 0.89, 0.48-1.64; nephrotoxicity 0.91, 0.56-1.47). In conclusion, the data suggest that the administration of the same total antibiotic dose by continuous intravenous infusion may be more efficient, with regard to clinical effectiveness, compared with the intermittent mode. In an era of gradually increasing resistance among most pathogens, the potential advantages of continuous intravenous administration of antibiotics on several clinical outcomes should be further investigated.     

Compression versus hand-sewn and stapled anastomosis in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Anastomotic leaks are a feared complication of colorectal resections and novel techniques that have the potential to decrease them are still sought. This study aimed to compare the anastomotic leak rates in patients undergoing compression anastomoses versus hand-sewn or stapled anastomoses. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of compression versus conventional (hand-sewn and stapled) colorectal anastomosis were collected from MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The quality of the RCTs and the potential risk of bias were assessed. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated for categorical outcomes and weighted mean differences for continuous data. Ten RCTs were included, comprising 1969 patients (752 sutured, 225 stapled, and 992 compression anastomoses). Most used the biofragmentable anastomotic ring. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of anastomotic leak rates (OR 0.80, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.47, 1.37; p = 0.42), stricture (OR 0.54: 95 % CI 0.18, 1.64; p = 0.28) or mortality (OR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.39, 1.26; p = 0.24). Compression anastomosis was associated with an earlier return of bowel function: 1.02 (95 % CI 1.37, 0.66) days earlier (p < 0.001) and a shorter postoperative stay; 1.13 (95 % CI 1.52, 0.74) days shorter (p < 0.001), but significant heterogeneity among studies was observed. There was an increased risk of postoperative bowel obstruction in the compression group (OR 1.87; 95 % CI 1.07, 3.26; p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in wound-related and general complications, or length of surgery. Compression devices do not appear to provide an advantage over conventional techniques in fashioning colorectal anastomoses and are associated with an increased risk of bowel obstruction.     

The role of oral antibiotics prophylaxis in prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery

Background

Surgical site infection (SSI) continues to be a challenge in colorectal surgery. Over the years, various modalities have been used in an attempt to reduce SSI risk in elective colorectal surgery, which include mechanical bowel preparation before surgery, oral antibiotics and intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis at induction of surgery. Even though IV antibiotics have become standard practice, there has been a debate on the exact role of oral antibiotics.

Aim

The primary aim was to identify the role of oral antibiotics in reduction of SSI in elective colorectal surgery. The secondary aim was to explore any potential benefit in the use of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) in relation to SSI in elective colorectal surgery.

Methods

Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched. Any randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies after 1980, which investigated the effectiveness of oral antibiotic prophylaxis and/or MBP in preventing SSIs in elective colorectal surgery were included.

Results

Twenty-three RCTs and eight cohorts were included. The results indicate a statistically significant advantage in preventing SSIs with the combined usage of oral and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. Furthermore, our analysis of the cohort studies shows no benefits in the use of MBP in prevention of SSIs.

Conclusions

The addition of oral antibiotics to systemic antibiotics could potentially reduce the risk of SSIs in elective colorectal surgery. Additionally, MBP does not seem to provide a clear benefit with regard to SSI prevention.

     

Ursodeoxycholic acid for the prevention of gallstones and subsequent cholecystectomy after bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal of Gastroenterology - This meta-analysis aimed to compare the incidence of gallstone formation, subsequent biliary disease and the need for cholecystectomy in untreated patients and...     

A prospective randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous passive drainage for the prevention of superficial surgical site infections in open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Introduction

A number of studies have evaluated the effects of subcutaneous drainage during digestive surgery. All of the previous studies assessed the usefulness of active-suctioning drain, including two randomized controlled studies which found no benefit for the placement of active-suctioning drains in digestive surgery. The utility of passive drainage has not been evaluated previously. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous passive drainage system for preventing surgical site infections during major colorectal surgery.

Patients and methods

A total of 263 patients who underwent major colorectal surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous passive drainage or no drainage. The primary outcome measured was the incidence of superficial surgical site infections. The secondary outcomes measured were the development of hematomas, seromas, and wound dehiscence.

Results

Finally, a total of 246 patients (124 underwent passive drainage, and 122 underwent no drainage) were included in the analysis after randomization. There was a significant difference in the incidence of superficial surgical site infections between patients assigned to the passive drainage and no drainage groups (3.2 % vs 9.8 %, respectively, P?=?0.041). There were no cases that developed a hematoma, seroma, or wound dehiscence in either group. A subgroup analysis revealed that male gender, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status ≥2, blood loss ≥100 ml, and open access were factors that were associated with a beneficial effect of subcutaneous passive drainage.

Conclusions

Subcutaneous passive drainage provides benefits over no drainage in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery.     

A randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous closed-suction Blake drains for the prevention of incisional surgical site infection after colorectal surgery

Background

The effects of subcutaneous closed-suction Blake drain for preventing incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) after colorectal surgery have never been evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Thus, we performed a RCT to evaluate the clinical benefits of using a subcutaneous closed-suction Blake drain in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Method

Consecutive patients who underwent colorectal surgery were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to the subcutaneous closed-suction drainage arm or the control (no subcutaneous drainage) arm. The primary endpoint was incidence rate of incisional SSIs. And, we performed logistic regression analysis to detect predictive factors for incisional SSIs after colorectal surgery.

Results

From November 2012 to September 2014, a total of 240 patients were enrolled in this study. One-hundred-seventeen patients who were treated by the control arm and 112 patients by the subcutaneous drainage arm were judged to be eligible for analysis. The incidence of incisional SSIs rate was 8.7 % in the overall patients. The incidence of incisional SSIs rate was 12.8 % in the control arm and 4.5 % in the subcutaneous drainage arm. There was significantly reduction of the incidence in the subcutaneous drainage arm than in the control arm (p = 0.025). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that thickness of subcutaneous fat >3.0 cm, forced expiratory volume in 1 s as percent of forced vital capacity (FEV1.0 %) >70 %, and subcutaneous drain were independent predictors of postoperative incisional SSIs (p = 0.008, p = 0.004, and p = 0.017, respectively).

Conclusion

The results of our RCT suggest that a subcutaneous Blake drain is beneficial for preventing incisional SSIs in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

     

Calcium supplementation for the prevention of colorectal adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM: To determine the efficacy of calcium supplementation in reducing the recurrence of colorectal adenomas.METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. We searched Pub Med, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the Clinical Trials.gov website, through December 2015. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials assessing supplemental calcium intake for the prevention of recurrence of adenomas were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently selected studies based on predefined criteria, extracted data and outcomes(recurrence of colorectal adenomas, and advanced or "high-risk" adenomas), and rated each trial's riskof-bias. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed, and pooled risk ratio(RR) estimates with their 95% confidence intervals(95%CI) were calculated using fixed- and random-effects models. To express the treatment effect in clinical terms, we calculated the number needed to treat(NNT) to prevent one adenoma recurrence. We also assessed the quality of evidence using GRADE.RESULTS: Four randomized, placebo-controlled trials met the eligibility criteria and were included. Daily doses of elemental calcium ranged from 1200 to 2000 mg, while the duration of treatment and follow-up of participants ranged from 36 to 60 mo. Synthesis of intention-to-treat data, for participants who had undergone follow-up colonoscopies, indicated a modest protective effect of calcium in prevention of adenomas(fixed-effects, RR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.82-0.96; randomeffects, RR = 0.87, 95%CI: 0.77-0.98; high quality of evidence). The NNT was 20(95%CI: 12-61) to prevent one colorectal adenoma recurrence within a period of 3 to 5 years. On the other hand, the association between calcium treatment and advanced adenomas did not reach statistical significance(fixed-effects, RR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.75-1.13; random-effects, RR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.71-1.18; moderate quality of evidence). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a modest chemopreventive effect of calcium supplements against recurrent colorectal adenomas over a period of 36 to 60 mo. Further research is warranted.     

Magnesium prophylaxis for arrhythmias after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Magnesium supplementation may reduce the incidence of arrhythmias, which often occur after cardiac surgery; however, recent findings of the effectiveness of magnesium prophylaxis have yielded discrepant results. METHODS: We searched electronic databases for randomized controlled trials of magnesium for the prevention of arrhythmias after cardiac surgery. The primary outcomes comprised the incidence of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias, and the secondary outcomes comprised serum magnesium concentration, length of hospital stay, myocardial infarction, and mortality. Effect sizes were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Seventeen trials (n=2069 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled serum magnesium concentration at 24 hours after surgery in the treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group (weighted mean difference=0.45 mmol/L [1.1 mg/dL]; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30 to 0.59 mmol/L [0.7 to 1.4 mg/dL]; P <0.001). Magnesium supplementation reduced the risk of supraventricular arrhythmias (relative risk [RR]=0.77; 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.93; P=0.002) and ventricular arrhythmias (RR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.87; P <0.0001), but had no effect on the length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference=-0.28 days; 95% CI: -0.70 to 1.27 days; P=0.48), the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (RR=1.03; 95% CI: 0.52 to 2.05; P = 0.99), or mortality (RR=0.97; 95% CI: 0.43 to 2.20; P=0.94). CONCLUSION: Administration of prophylactic magnesium reduced the risk of supraventricular arrhythmias after cardiac surgery by 23% (atrial fibrillation by 29%) and of ventricular arrhythmias by 48%. Supplementation had no notable benefit with respect to length of hospitalization, incidence of myocardial infarction, or mortality.     

Comparison of repaglinide and metformin versus metformin alone for type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of repaglinide plus metformin with metformin alone on type 2 diabetes. Twenty-two studies were included in this meta-analysis. Results showed combination therapy was safe and could gain better outcomes in glycemic control. Well-designed studies are required to confirm this conclusion.     

Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background  

Ertapenem, a new carbapenem with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, has been approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal Infections (cIAIs), acute pelvic infections (APIs) and complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSSIs). The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ertapenem with piperacillin/tazobactam, which has been reported to possess good efficacy for the treatment of these complicated infections.     

Chronomodulated chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials

Purpose  

The purpose of this study was to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of chronomodulated chemotherapy with conventional chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.     

Is brace necessary after cervical surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background:Currently, there are increasing surgical treatments for neck pain. However, whether to use cervical brace after operation remains poorly defined. We aim to clear the clinical efficacy of the use of cervical brace after cervical surgery.Methods:We searched for relevant studies in 8 electronic databases up to March 2021. The mean difference and 95% confidence intervals were used for continuous data. Cochrane Collaboration’s tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The data were collected and input into the Review Manager 5.3 software (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).Results:Four randomized controlled trials were finally included in our study. For pain, the pooled analysis showed that postoperative neck brace compared with no brace can relieve neck pain at all follow-up periods except 6 months. For neck disability index, the result showed that postoperative neck brace compared with no brace can improve neck disability index during the 3 to 12 month follow-up period. However, no significant difference was identified between 2 groups within the follow-up of 6 weeks after surgery. In addition, the result tends to get the opposite at follow-up of 24 months. For 36-Short form health survey Physical Component Summary, there was no significant difference between 2 groups in the early 3 weeks after surgery, but the results were changed after 3 weeks. For 36-short form health survey Mental Component Summary, there appears to be no significant change between 2 groups at all time intervals.Conclusion:Wearing a cervical brace after cervical surgery is conducive to improving symptoms after cervical surgery at different stages. However, there is no relevant evidence indicating it can improve the mental health of postoperative patients. Higher quality, large prospective randomized studies are needed to verify the current conclusions.     

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with chemotherapy alone in metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose  Bevacizumab has demonstrated survival benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients when combined with chemotherapy. Several randomized clinical studies have evaluated bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy. Meta-analysis was performed to better assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab with chemotherapy for mCRC. Materials and methods  Five clinical trials randomizing a total of 3,103 mCRC patients to chemotherapy alone or to the combined treatment of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were identified. The efficacy data included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and overall response rate (ORR), and the safety data contained the 60-day all-cause mortality rate, adverse events (AEs), and specific toxicity such as hypertension, thrombosis, bleeding, proteinuria, gastrointestinal perforation, diarrhea, and leucopenia. Result  There was a significant PFS benefit (P = 0.00; hazards ratio [HR] = 0.66) and OS benefit (P = 0.00; HR = 0.77) in favor of the combined treatment. The ORR was significantly higher on the bevacizumab-containing arm (P = 0.021; relative risk [RR] = 1.5), while CR was comparable between the two arms (P = 0.09). A higher incidence of grade 3/4 AEs, grade 3/4 hypertension, grade 3/4 thromboembolic/thrombotic events, grade 3/4 bleeding, and gastrointestinal perforation was associated with the bevacizumab group. The two treatment groups were similar in terms of grade 3/4 proteinuria, grade 3/4 leukopenia, grade 3/4 diarrhea, and the 60-day all-cause mortality rate. Conclusion  The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy confers a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in OS, PFS, and ORR. Its side effects are predictable and manageable and do not compound the incidence or severity of toxicities from chemotherapy.     

Polyunsaturated fatty acids for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundSeveral clinical trials showed inconsistent results of the effect of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) on the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF). The aim of this meta-analysis is to investigate the effect of PUFA on the incidence of POAF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Methods and resultsPUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistic and Cochran's Q statistic. The effect of PUFA on the incidence of POAF was presented as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a fixed effect model or random effect model depending on statistical heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the baseline characteristics of patients, types of surgery, the ratio of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)/docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and the quality of the studies. Eight trials with 2687 patients were included in the analysis. Treatment with PUFA had no effect on the incidence of POAF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery compared to placebo [RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.71–1.04, p = 0.110]. Subgroup analyses showed the quality of the studies, the ratio of EPA/DHA, accompanied with diabetes might impact the effect of PUFA on POAF. No evidence of publication bias was detected.ConclusionsThe present analysis suggests that treatment with PUFA preoperatively has no effect on the incidence of POAF in patients undergoing open heart surgery. However, patients with diabetes might get benefits from the treatment with PUFA preoperatively.     

Ring drape do not protect against surgical site infections in colorectal surgery: a randomised controlled study

Introduction

Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a major problem in colorectal surgery.

Method

In this prospective, randomised study, we compared two kinds of wound protection, namely, “plastic ring drape” versus “standard cloth towels”. One hundred one patients were randomised to the control group (wet cloth towels) and 98 to the study cohort (ring drape). SSIs were classified according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations.

Discussion

In the control group, 30 patients had an SSI, whereas 20 did so in the study group. This difference was not significant (p?=?0.131).

Conclusion

Plastic ring drape for wound protection does not guard against SSIs in colorectal surgery.     

Antibiotic prophylaxis of bacterial infections in cirrhotic inpatients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis has been reported to decrease bacterial infections and fatality rates in inpatients with cirrhosis. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in inpatients with cirrhosis, regardless of the underlying risk factors that led to hospital admission. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search strategy was performed including the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, a manual search of bibliographic references, and contacting the authors of each included trial. We included any randomized clinical trial comparing different types of antibiotic prophylaxis with placebo or no intervention in inpatients with cirrhosis. Two reviewers independently applied the selection criteria to all identified references, appraised the methodological quality of each trial and extracted the relevant data. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using the fixed effect model. A test of heterogeneity and a funnel plot were performed and an intention-to-treat approach was used for the outcome measures. RESULTS: Nineteen randomized trials were identified, 13 of which were included in the review. A significant beneficial effect on mortality (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56, 0.89) and prevention of bacterial infections (RR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.32, 0.48) was observed, regardless of the underlying risk factors. Few adverse events were reported and there was no heterogeneity between studies. We identified a funnel plot asymmetry for the included trials. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis for inpatients with cirrhosis is efficacious in reducing the number of deaths and bacterial infections regardless of the underlying risk factors.     

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: an update of meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

This study aimed to produce a comprehensive, up-to-date meta-analysis exploring the safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery programs after colorectal resection.

Method

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane database searches were performed for relevant studies published between January 1966 and April 2012. All randomized controlled trials on fast track (FT) colorectal surgery were reviewed systematically. The main end points were short-term morbidity, length of primary postoperative hospital stay, length of total postoperative stay, readmission rate, and mortality.

Results

Seven randomized controlled trials with 852 patients were included. The total length of hospital stay [mean difference (95?% confidence interval), ?1.88 (?2.91, ?0.86), p?=?0.0003] and total complication rates [relative risk (95?% confidence interval), 0.69 (0.51, 0.93), p?=?0.01] were significantly reduced in the enhanced recovery group. There was no statistically significant difference in readmission (risk ratio (RR) 0.90; 95?% confidence interval (CI) 0.52 to 1.53, p?=?0.69) and mortality rates (RR 1.02; 95?% CI 0.40 to 2.57, p?=?0.97).

Conclusion

Results suggested that enhanced recovery after surgery pathways can be able to reduce the length of stay and complication rates after major colorectal surgery without compromising patient safety. Future studies have to define the active elements in order to improve future fast track protocols.     

Comparative randomized study of protected environment plus oral antibiotics versus oral antibiotics alone in neutropenic patients.

A series of 24 patients with severe neutropenia, most of whom had acute myeloblastic leukemia, were treated in an isolation unit with oral nonabsorbable antibiotics and were compared to 21 similar patients receiving oral antibiotics alone. The frequency of bacterial infections was lower in the patients receiving both isolation and oral antibiotics compared to the patients who received only oral antibiotics. The responses to chemotherapy in terms of remission rates were identical for the two groups.     

Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol on pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of non-randomized and randomized controlled trials

BackgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely applied in many surgical specialties. However, with respect to the impact of ERAS on pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), there still exist some controversies.MethodsLiterature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from January, 1990 to July, 2019. A meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effects or random-effects models.ResultsTwenty-two studies containing 4147 patients were identified. The entire pooled data showed that ERAS significantly reduced overall and minor morbidity (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72–0.88, p < 0.001; RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.69–0.88, p < 0.001, respectively), but didn't affect major morbidity (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.84–1.13, p = 0.72). ERAS markedly reduced the incidences of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.55–0.88, p = 0.002), incisional infection (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.60–0.94, p = 0.01) and intra-abdominal infection (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63–1.00, p = 0.05), but didn't influence clinically-relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.73–1.01, p = 0.07). Shorter length of stay (LOS) (WMD: −5.07, 95% CI: −6.71 to −3.43, p < 0.001) was noted in ERAS group, without increasing 30-day readmission (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.86–1.24, p = 0.71) and mortality (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.41–1.21, p = 0.20).ConclusionERAS significantly reduced overall and minor morbidity, incidences of DGE, incisional and intra-abdominal infections, and shortened LOS in PD, without increasing 30-day readmission and mortality. However, more large-scale randomized controlled trials are still needed to confirm the findings.